Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 for desktop PCs is a graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1650 integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. The performance should be slightly faster than the old GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Although, the mobile variant of the GTX1650 uses the same name, it is a bit slower due to lower clock rates.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Compared to the bigger Turing chips (like the TU116 of the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX lineup), the TU117 does not include the new NVENC encoder but an older one similar to the one used in Pascal and Volta.

The power consumption of the 1650 is specified at 75 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) by Nvidia. The TU117 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) compare 1536 @ 1500 - 1770 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compare 1536 @ 1455 - 1590 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1530 - 1785 MHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compare 1536 @ 1140 - 1335 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) compare 1024 @ 1530 - 1725 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compare 1024 @ 1350 MHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile compare 1024 @ 1395 - 1560 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) 896 @ 1485 - 1665 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1035 - 1200 MHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1020 - 1245 MHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
ArchitectureTuring
Pipelines896 - unified
Core Speed1485 - 1665 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12_1, Shader 6.4
technology12 nm
Date of Announcement23.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/gra...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
34 pt (35%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 200932     avg: 224353     median: 224352 (30%)     max: 247773 Points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 12
Solidworks (sw-03) 1900x1060 +
Siemens NX (snx-02) 1900x1060 +
Showcase (showcase-01) 1900x1060 +
Medical (medical-01) 1900x1060 +
Maya (maya-04) 1900x1060 +
Energy (energy-01) 1900x1060 +
Creo (creo-01) 1900x1060 +
Catia (catia-04) 1900x1060 +
3ds Max (3dsmax-05) 1900x1060 +
SPECviewperf 13 Solidworks (sw-04) +
Siemens NX (snx-03) +
Showcase (showcase-02) +
Medical (medical-02) +
Maya (maya-05) +
Energy (energy-02) +
Creo (creo-02) +
Catia (catia-05) +
3ds Max (3dsmax-06) +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
min: 7011     avg: 7085     median: 7085 (25%)     max: 7159 Points
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
min: 183     avg: 195     median: 200.4 (46%)     max: 202.5 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption (external Monitor) ultra 1920x1080 *
min: 178.87     avg: 195     median: 202.9 (43%)     max: 203.9 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn

2020
low 1280x720
99  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Death Stranding

Death Stranding

2020
low 1280x720
98.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
219  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
88.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
60.3  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
42.9  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

2020
low 1280x720
252.9 259.1 ~ 256 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.7 95.8 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56 62.2 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.4 40.1 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26 27.8 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14.4 15 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
116 163 ~ 140 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80.4 90.2 ~ 85 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.4 77.2 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
69.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
138 153 ~ 146 fps    + Compare