Notebookcheck Logo

Once Human tech review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks

Open-World meets free-to-play.

Once Human combines elements from various genres, much like many other games released this year. In this article, you will find out the hard requirements you can expect from the game.
Once Human

Test systems

XMG Neo 16 E23 (RTX 4090)
XMG Neo 16 E23 (RTX 4090)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 (RTX 4080)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 (RTX 4080)
XMG Pro 15 E23 (RTX 4070)
XMG Pro 15 E23 (RTX 4070)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 (RTX 4060 & Radeon 780M)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 (RTX 4060 & Radeon 780M)
Medion Erazer Scout E20 (RTX 4050)
Medion Erazer Scout E20 (RTX 4050)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 (Arc 8)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 (Arc 8)
Philips Evnia 4K Gaming Monitor 329M1RV
Philips Evnia 4K Gaming Monitor 329M1RV
be quiet! Silent Base 802 (RTX 4080 & RX 7900 XT)
be quiet! Silent Base 802 (RTX 4080 & RX 7900 XT)

We currently carry out our gaming benchmarks with these devices. Clicking on the photos will take you to the respective manufacturer's website. More details on their specifications are listed at the end of the article.

Tech

Similar to The First Descendant, which we recently reviewed, Once Human is available for free on Steam and remains highly popular even one month after its release, according to the charts. However, our initial experience with the game has been rather mixed.

Once Human
Once Human
Once Human
Once Human
Once Human
Once Human

Once Human requires an approximately 40 GB download and occupies about 50 GB of storage space. When launching it for the first time, you’ll first need to download a nearly 10 GB patch and then restart the game – à la Call of Duty. This is followed by a loading process and shader compilation, which unfortunately has become a thing with a lot of current games. But it is quite rare that changing certain settings triggers this process again (e.g. in Atomic Heart).

Once Human
Once Human
Once Human
Once Human
Once Human
Once Human

That said, the experience is fairly positive once you make it onto a server at some point. The thrilling intro and mysterious scenario reminded us of a cross between Control and Ghostwire Tokyo. Later, the feel and gameplay shift more towards looting, crafting and survival, similar to what we’ve seen over the past months with games like Enshrouded.

Once Human
Once Human
Once Human
Once Human
Once Human
Once Human

Once Human leaves a relatively positive impression on the technical front. Although objects and enhanced textures do pop in occasionally and things can sometimes appear slightly blurry at a distance, the game’s visuals are definitely quite impressive. The engine also seems to run stably; we didn’t counter any crash at all during our testing. Performance is the one aspect that the developers could still do some tweaking. Despite having reasonable graphics requirements, the game is still prone to annoying stutters even when running on more powerful systems (i.e. low minimum fps).

Once Human
Once Human
Once Human

There is not much to complain about the options menu of this multiplayer title. Whilst the Basic tab is very straightforward, the Performance section offers five presets and roughly ten quality settings. It’s unfortunate that some setting changes require a restart and that FSR is the only upscaling method supported (no DLSS or XeSS available).

Benchmark

For our benchmarks, we used a roughly 30-second run across the open world (see video) where the player reaches after the introductory sequence. The area features water surfaces, wide views and abundant vegetation. Since Once Human is a third-person game, a frame rate of 40 fps or more is likely sufficient to provide a good gameplay experience.

FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

As previously mentioned, the game’s system requirements are quite moderate. Integrated GPUs in the same league as the AMD Radeon 780M or Intel Arc 8 should allow you to play the game at no lower than 1080p and low preset. Devices with a mid-range dedicated GPU should have no problem handling much higher settings at this resolution (see table).

Note: From the article onwards, a popular gaming handheld in the form of the ROG Ally will join our lineup of standard test devices.

Once Human
    1920x1080 Very High Preset     1920x1080 High Preset     1920x1080 Medium Preset     1920x1080 Low Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
237 (48.5min, 115.2P0.1, 160.7P1) fps ∼100%
238 (9.7min, 73.8P0.1, 160.5P1) fps ∼100%
239 (27.9min, 101.3P0.1, 165.9P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
194.3 (6.06min, 121.2P0.1, 152.3P1) fps ∼82%
223 (28.5min, 130.5P0.1, 173.3P1) fps ∼94%
232 (6.04min, 84.9P0.1, 171.7P1) fps ∼97%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 16 E23
170.6 (28.7min, 42.4P0.1, 100P1) fps ∼72%
196.9 (12min, 29.8P0.1, 109.2P1) fps ∼83%
230 (31.7min, 44.4P0.1, 128.2P1) fps ∼96%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
129.8 (17.8min, 39.7P0.1, 66.5P1) fps ∼55%
147.3 (18.7min, 38.5P0.1, 76.5P1) fps ∼62%
171.8 (8.78min, 35P0.1, 85P1) fps ∼72%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
107.4 (13.2min, 42.7P0.1, 64.4P1) fps ∼45%
119.7 (15.8min, 42.1P0.1, 72.4P1) fps ∼50%
151.6 (30.7min, 54.8P0.1, 87.4P1) fps ∼63%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
88.7 (27.7min, 31.8P0.1, 46.3P1) fps ∼37%
99.7 (22.8min, 35.3P0.1, 50.2P1) fps ∼42%
120.6 (7.93min, 40.1P0.1, 62.5P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
78.5 (40.4min, 51.5P0.1, 59.9P1) fps ∼33%
87.8 (12.1min, 19.6P0.1, 62.7P1) fps ∼37%
105.4 (5.82min, 23.9P0.1, 74.2P1) fps ∼44%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Ultra 7 155H
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14
24.2 (3.07min, 4.66P0.1, 6.22P1) fps ∼10%
28.2 (9.48min, 9.78P0.1, 17P1) fps ∼12%
29.9 (6.13min, 7.11P0.1, 19.7P1) fps ∼13%
44.4 (25.7min, 34.2P0.1, 37.6P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
19.1 (8.88min, 10.2P0.1, 14.4P1) fps ∼8%
21.6 (3.96min, 7.35P0.1, 15.5P1) fps ∼9%
26.2 (2.83min, 4.06P0.1, 12.2P1) fps ∼11%
39.3 (25.4min, 28.1P0.1, 31.7P1) fps ∼89%
AMD Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
18.6 (10.1min, 10.5P0.1, 14.7P1) fps ∼8%
19.7 (1.818min, 2.38P0.1, 10.3P1) fps ∼8%
26.6 (2.28min, 3.76P0.1, 14P1) fps ∼11%
39.3 (4.77min, 12.8P0.1, 29.7P1) fps ∼89%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

You likewise don’t need a high-end GPU for a combination of 1440p and Very High preset. A GeForce RTX 4050 is powerful enough to offer solid performance at these settings. 

Once Human
    2560x1440 Very High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
171.2 (84.2min, 106.3P0.1, 123.9P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
146.7 (62.6min, 111.1P0.1, 122.5P1) fps ∼86%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 16 E23
123 (26.1min, 40.4P0.1, 74.9P1) fps ∼72%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
86.3 (29.3min, 34.4P0.1, 51.9P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
71.8 (27.8min, 31.9P0.1, 47.7P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
59.1 (25.4min, 26.9P0.1, 37.3P1) fps ∼35%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
48.7 (25.4min, 32.3P0.1, 39.2P1) fps ∼28%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

As is often the case, Once Human becomes highly demanding once it reaches 4K resolution. The game requires at least a laptop with an RTX 4080 to run well at 4K and max settings.

Once Human
    3840x2160 Very High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
88.9 (48.2min, 62.3P0.1, 72.5P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
74 (55.1min, 57.9P0.1, 61.9P1) fps ∼83%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 16 E23
67.3 (17.5min, 22.6P0.1, 35.6P1) fps ∼76%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
45.1 (19.8min, 23.8P0.1, 31.5P1) fps ∼51%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
35.7 (16.5min, 22.7P0.1, 28.8P1) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
28.7 (11.7min, 11.9P0.1, 20.3P1) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
23.8 (8.01min, 11.7P0.1, 19.1P1) fps ∼27%

Note

Because gaming tests are highly time-consuming and often constrained by installation or activation limits, we are only able to deliver part of the benchmark results at the time of publishing this article. More graphics cards will be added subsequently.

Overview

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >Once Human
 Once Human (2024)
low
1920x1080
Low Preset
med.
1920x1080
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
ultra
1920x1080
Very High Preset
QHD FSR
2560x1440
Very High Preset + Quality FSR
QHD
2560x1440
Very High Preset
4K FSR
3840x2160
Very High Preset + Quality FSR
4K
3840x2160
Very High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
240
240
240
240
226
121.4
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
412
340
296
276
191.9
122.6
99.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
239
238
237
171.2
88.9
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
232
223
194.3
146.7
93.5
74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
230
196.9
170.6
123
67.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
240
239
207
183.6
124.8
66.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
171.8
147.3
129.8
86.3
45.1
NVIDIA Titan RTX
240
178.4
152.7
137.1
93.2
49
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
240
205
166
152.3
101.3
53.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
186.95n2
147n3
119.7n3
107.4n3
71.8n3
35.7n3
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
205
128.1
106.7
94.7
58.7
36.3
26.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
186.1n2
134.3n2
113.35n2
101.8n2
67.2n2
35.25n2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
239
166
137.2
120.9
79.6
40.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
164.8
126.75n2
104n2
91.45n2
76.5
60.7n2
28.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
184.4
126.1
108.6
99
68.2
35.6
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
181.8
121.6
99.1
88.9
70.5
55.7
35
25.3
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
185.1
129.2
104.9
91.4
60.7
31.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)
199.6
134.4
107.3
98.6
63.8
32.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)
171.7
119.5
98.6
86.6
55.9
28
PosModel< PrevNext >Once Human
low med. high ultra QHD FSR QHD 4K FSR 4K
AMD Radeon RX 6600
120.2
72.9
60.2
54.1
43.2
32.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)
123.7
85.7
71.2
61.3
38.8
19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
105.4
87.8
78.5
48.7
23.8
Intel Arc A730M
95.5
63.4
56.7
52.5
34.2
14.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)
111
73.7
53.7
34.3
58.4
16.2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)
97.5
67.4
50.7
45.3
28.9
10
AMD Radeon 890M
57.9n2
39.45n2
32.15n2
27.8n2
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
40n2
27.05n2
25.4n2
22.35n2
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
49.5
29.8
27.1
26.1
AMD Radeon 880M
36.1
25.3
22.8
20.6
AMD Radeon 780M
39.3n3
26.6n3
21.6n3
19.1n3
AMD Radeon 760M
27.1
19.9
14.9
14.2
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
18
AMD Radeon 740M
24.7
17.9
13.4
12.4
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Details of the test systems

Notebook Graphics card Processor Memory
XMG Neo 16 E23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13900HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13950HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i9-13900HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) & Radeon 780M AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-13700H 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 Intel Arc 8 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Tower PC Graphics card Processor Memory
Asus ROG Strix Z790-F Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-13900K 2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill
4K monitor Operating system Nvidia driver AMD driver Intel driver
Philips Evnia 329M1RV Windows 11 560.70 24.7.1 101.5768
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Once Human tech review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks
Florian Glaser, 2024-08- 7 (Update: 2024-08-15)