Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

The AMD Radeon RX 5300M is a dedicated mobile mid-range graphics card for laptops. It uses the new Navi 14 chip (RDNA architecture) which is produced in 7nm. Is supports fast and expensive GDDR6 VRAM and when using it, it should be faster than a GeForce GTX 1650 (according to leaked benchmarks from AMD).

The Navi 14 chip uses the new RDNA (Radeon DNA) microarchitecture which is a successor the the GCN instruction set. It features a new processor design, a multi-level cache hierarchy and an improved rendering pipeline with support for GDDR6 memory.

The performance should be around the GeForce GTX 1650 according to AMD. Therefore, it is most suited for medium to high detail settings in full HD for demanding games in 2019.

The RX5300M uses the same amount of compute cores as the faster 5500M but at a lower clock rate that leads to a lower TDP of the chip of 65 Watt (versus 85W of the 5500M).

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon RX 5000M Series
Radeon RX 5700M compare 2304 @ 1720 MHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Radeon RX 5600M compare 2304 @ 1265 MHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Radeon RX 5500M compare 1408 @ 1327 - 1645 MHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Radeon RX 5300M 1408 @ 1036 - 1445 MHz96 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameNavi 14 / E19M-E65
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA
Pipelines1408 - unified
Core Speed1036 - 1445 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width96 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory3072 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12, Shader 6.4
technology7 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.4 w/DFSC, HDMI 2.0b, Radeon Media Engine (H.264 4K150 decode, 4K90 encode / H.265 4K90 decode, 4K60 encode / VP9 4K90 decode)
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement29.09.2019

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 8782     avg: 9120     median: 9093 (30%)     max: 9510 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 11869     avg: 12889     median: 12818.5 (33%)     max: 14048 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Gears Tactics

Gears Tactics

2020
low 1280x720
231  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
137  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
95.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
71.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
78.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
127  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
164  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
82  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
190  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
172  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
160  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
153  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
97.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.5 36 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
132  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare