Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

AMD Radeon RX 5300M

The AMD Radeon RX 5300M is a dedicated mobile mid-range graphics card for laptops. It uses the new Navi 14 chip (RDNA architecture) which is produced in 7nm. Is supports fast and expensive GDDR6 VRAM and when using it, it should be faster than a GeForce GTX 1650 (according to leaked benchmarks from AMD).

The Navi 14 chip uses the new RDNA (Radeon DNA) microarchitecture which is a successor the the GCN instruction set. It features a new processor design, a multi-level cache hierarchy and an improved rendering pipeline with support for GDDR6 memory.

The performance should be around the GeForce GTX 1650 according to AMD. Therefore, it is most suited for medium to high detail settings in full HD for demanding games in 2019.

The RX5300M uses the same amount of compute cores as the faster 5500M but at a lower clock rate that leads to a lower TDP of the chip of 65 Watt (versus 85W of the 5500M).

Radeon RX 5000M Series

Radeon RX 5700M compare 2304 @ 1.47 - 1.72 GHz256 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Radeon RX 5600M compare 2304 @ 1.27 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
Radeon RX 5500M compare 1408 @ 1.33 - 1.65 GHz128 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Radeon RX 5300M 1408 @ 1.04 - 1.45 GHz96 Bit @ 14000 MHz
CodenameNavi 14 / E19M-E65
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA
Pipelines1408 - unified
Core Speed1036 - 1445 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed14000 MHz
Memory Bus Width96 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory3 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, Shader 6.4, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption65 Watt
technology7 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.4 w/DFSC, HDMI 2.0b, Radeon Media Engine (H.264 4K150 decode, 4K90 encode / H.265 4K90 decode, 4K60 encode / VP9 4K90 decode)
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement29.09.2019

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 11869     avg: 12889     median: 12818.5 (18%)     max: 14048 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
231  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
100  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
66.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!)  fps    + Compare
low 1280x720
137  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
53  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
43.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
80.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
56.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
95.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
med. 1920x1080
71.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
53.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
78.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
58.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
127  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
164  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
54.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
82  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
190  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
172  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
160  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
153  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
97.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.5 36 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
132  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
41.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
176  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
94  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
83.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
120  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
190  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
110  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
89.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
88  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
105  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
143  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
87.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
108  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
52.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
155  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
76.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
62.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
140  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
70.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
74.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
72  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34 36 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
80.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
60.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
51.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
118  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
98.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
51.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
29.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
131  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
81.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
58.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
113  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
108  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
94.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
178  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
122  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
163  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
86.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
145
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
153
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Gears Tactics23110066.447.5
Doom Eternal
Hunt Showdown1375343.2
Escape from Tarkov12180.570.156.7
Red Dead Redemption 295.441.232.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order71.261.153.1
Need for Speed Heat78.667.958.652.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201912772.257.947
GRID 201916476.854.825.5
Ghost Recon Breakpoint82514122
FIFA 20190172160153
Borderlands 397.363.640.933
Control13241.829.4
F1 20191761069481
Rage 212154.830.429.8
Anno 180083.460.339.720.6
The Division 2120756342
Dirt Rally 2.019011089.949.5
Far Cry New Dawn88696458
Metro Exodus10551.236.128.6
Apex Legends14387.268.667.6
Just Cause 410879.15652.5
Darksiders III15576.862.254.9
Battlefield V14091.879.470.8
Hitman 274.565.755.848.8
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey72594225
Shadow of the Tomb Raider114604835
Monster Hunter World80.660.152.242.6
X-Plane 11.1151.539.534.9
Kingdom Come: Deliverance11870.460.838.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark98.451.629.3
Fortnite13111481.858.2
Dota 2 Reborn11310897.994.7
The Witcher 31781226038.3
GTA V16386.142.6
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
15
17

9
22
2
2
16
15
1
6
18
4
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 08:50:40

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.084s ... 0.085s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.085s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.085s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9945 +0.016s ... 0.101s

#7 got single benchmarks 9945 +0.015s ... 0.116s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.116s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.636s ... 0.752s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.752s

#11 Got 135 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.768s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.768s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.027s ... 0.795s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.44s ... 2.235s

#15 return log +0.048s ... 2.284s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon RX 5300M graphics card

MSI Bravo 15

MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Laptop Review: For bargain hunters

Longstanding market leaders in terms of performance, Intel and Nvidia are increasingly experiencing pricing pressure. This is the "fault" of devices such as the...
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H | AMD Radeon RX 5300M | 15.60" | 2 kg

MSI Alpha 15 A3DC-250XES: AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, 15.60"
  External Review » MSI Alpha 15 A3DC-250XES

MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR, Ryzen 5 4600H, RX5300M: AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR, Ryzen 5 4600H, RX5300M

MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR: AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, 15.60", 2 kg
   » MSI Bravo 15: Raising the AMD flag

Navi 14 GPUs CUs Shader Boost Core Clock Memory Memory Bus Memory Speed Gbps TGP
AMD Radeon RX 5500 Desktop 22 1408 1845 GDDR6 128 14 150 W (Board)
AMD Radeon RX 5500M Mobile 22 1408 1645 GDDR6 128 14 85
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M Apple 24 1536 1300 GDDR6 128 12 50
AMD Radeon RX 5300 (XT?) Desktop 20 1280 1500 GDDR5? 96? 12
AMD Radeon RX 5300M Mobile 22 1408 1250 GDDR6 96 14 65
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M Apple 22 1408 1250 GDDR6 128 12 50
Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter