Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4(Ice Lake with 48 EUs) is an integrated graphics card in the Ice Lake SoCs (10th generation core 10xxG4) for laptops. It offers no dedicated graphics memory (no eDRAM cache like the Intel Iris Graphics 655 predecessor of the Coffee Lake SoCs). It offers 48 of the 64 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Blocks) of the Ice Lake chip and the clock rate depends on the processor model. At launch it looks like all models have a 300 MHz base clock and only differ in the boost clock (1050 - 1100 MHz). Another difference is the TDP as it can be configured from 12 - 25 Watt in the 15 Watt U-models and maybe even higher in the 25 Watt models that will come later.

The performance was not yet communicated, but due to the 25% less cores and similar clock speeds the performance should be clearly lower than the full Iris Plus G7 models. Although, the Ice Lake G4 graphics does not feature any dedicated graphics memory it should perform better than the old Iris Plus 655 with 128 MB eDRAM. Compared to AMDs offering, we suspect the performance should be similar to an AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 GPU. Therefore, the gaming performance should be only sufficient for low demanding games like Rocket League or Overwatch.

A special new feature of the Gen11 graphics card is the new Variable Rate Shading (VRS) support. With it game designers can decide where to spend shading time and e.g. shade object in the background or behind fog with less resolution (up to using only one source for a 4x4 block). With this technique early results show up to 1.3x performance in Unreal Engine POC and 1.2x speedup in Civ 6. Up to now VRS is only supported by the new Nvidia Turing architecture (GTX 1650 and up).

Another improved hardware piece is the integrated video de- and encoder that was improved significantly according to Intel. They did not specify any more details, but the previous generation was able to decode VP9 and H.265/HEVC in Main10 profile with 10 bit color depth using the dedicated hardware.

The Iris Plus G4 supports three display pipes that can each output 5K60 signals (via DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 or HDMI 2.0b). Combining two pipes, the chip is capable to output 8k content.

The Ice Lake SoCs and therefore the integrated GPU are manufactured in the modern 10nm+ process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process of TSMC.

Gen. 11 Series

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compare 64 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) compare 48 @ 0.2 - 0.5 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.35 - 0.9 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) compare 32 @ 0.4 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 16 EU) compare 16 @ 0.25 - 0.85 GHz
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compare 24 @ 0.35 - 0.8 GHz
CodenameIce Lake G4 Gen. 11
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake
Pipelines48 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1100 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeDDR4
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
Power Consumption12-25 Watt
technology10 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement28.05.2019
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i5-1035G44 x 1100 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i5-1030G44 x 700 MHz, 9 W300 MHz1050 MHz
Intel Core i3-1000NG42 x 1100 MHz, 9 W300 MHz900 MHz
Intel Core i3-1000G42 x 1100 MHz, 9 W300 MHz900 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz900 - 1050 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1 pt (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 50243     avg: 82914     median: 82913.5 (9%)     max: 115584 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 839     avg: 1793     median: 1988 (4%)     max: 2071 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 922     avg: 1934     median: 2124 (2%)     max: 2230 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1941     avg: 2965     median: 3225 (3%)     max: 3334 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 6413     avg: 10836     median: 13031 (17%)     max: 13065 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.1     median: 97.8 (98%)     max: 99.3 %
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
26.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
36.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
20.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
36.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
69.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
43.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
25.3 25.5 ~ 25 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8.3 10.5 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.1 7.3 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
22.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
50  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
43.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
22.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
31.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
66  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
41.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
9 18 22 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
18 20 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
202.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
17.8 26.3 26.3 26.5 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.3 14.2 14.2 14.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
17.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
39.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
92.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
84.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
57.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
45.9 53.2 84.7 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.7 29.8 45.8 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.3 32.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
37.4
63.6
low 1280x720
15.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
39.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
66.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
8 54.6 60.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.8 44.1 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.7 20.7 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.7 18 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
38.2
low 1024x768
10.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
62.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1366x768
88.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
51.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
25.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
48.2 56 69.3 69.3 81.2 108 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.4 33.2 34 41.6 41.6 43.6 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.4 14.7 20.5 23.2 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8 14.1 19.6 19.6 19.6 20.9 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
9.1 35.7 37.2 39.4 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.2 23.4 24.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.4 12.6 12.9 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.7 7.4 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
44.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
32.7
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
34.8
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
166.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
34 86.1 87.3 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.6 50.8 55.2 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20.3 42.9 47.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1 15.2 17.2 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
247.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
136.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
78.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
134.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
96.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
68.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
118.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
89  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
78.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
64.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.6  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
30.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
248.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
59.1  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
38.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Hunt Showdown26.511.5
Escape from Tarkov36.11915.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order108.9
Need for Speed Heat20.310
GRID 201936.717.115.29.1
Ghost Recon Breakpoint109
FIFA 2069.743.839.830.2
Borderlands 325963.5
Control22.67.6
F1 201950221914
Total War: Three Kingdoms43.713.87.8
Rage 222.411.7
Anno 180031.411.5
The Division 22110
Dirt Rally 2.06621.517.59.1
Apex Legends41.218.61414
Battlefield V29.114.112.611.6
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey1711
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1610
Far Cry 51911109
World of Tanks enCore202.931.215
X-Plane 11.11241312
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark17.39.5
Fortnite39.512.311.67
Team Fortress 292.584.357.930.1
Rocket League613326
Ghost Recon Wildlands15.29.7
For Honor39.315.314.511.9
Civilization VI66.830.211.6
Overwatch41391915
Rise of the Tomb Raider10.2
Rainbow Six Siege62.342.725.320.3
World of Warships88.151.925.419.1
Dota 2 Reborn72361818
The Witcher 33023137
GTA V44.539.313.45.1
Sims 4166.760.335.225.2
BioShock Infinite69433714
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm247.229.929.816.5
Tomb Raider136.978.146.824.5
Counter-Strike: GO134.496.668.937.1
Diablo III118.38978.344
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim64.642.630.816.6
StarCraft 2248.459.138.721.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
15
11
11
6
26
12
5
22
7
2
22
4







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 17. 08:56:16

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.052s ... 0.053s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.053s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9869 +0.032s ... 0.085s

#7 got single benchmarks 9869 +0.033s ... 0.118s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.893s ... 1.011s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.011s

#11 Got 202 rows for game benchmarks. +0.022s ... 1.034s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.034s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.037s ... 1.071s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.669s ... 2.74s

#15 return log +0.059s ... 2.798s

Notebook reviews with Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) graphics card

The Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-56S5 convertible in review. (Image source: Acer)

Acer Spin 3 SP314: Stylish convertible convinces in review

The Acer Spin 3 convertible is half laptop, half tablet. Is the device a lazy compromise in both categories, or is the compact 14-inch device a cheap deal with ...
Intel Core i5-1035G4 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 13.3 review

Galaxy Book Flex 13.3 in review: Samsung convertible with bright display

The Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 13.3 features a fancy aluminum case and a bright touchscreen. But the Windows convertible has to prove in our test that its inner c...
Intel Core i5-1035G4 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 13.30" | 1.2 kg
Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS

Acer Swift 3 SF313 laptop review: Also a good subnotebook with i5

After the Acer Swift 3 SF313 was able to make a good impression in its full configuration, the Intel Core i5 model now has to show if it can deliver a similarly...
Intel Core i5-1035G4 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 13.50" | 1.2 kg
Apple MacBook Air 2020 Review: Is the Core i3 the better choice?

Apple MacBook Air 2020 Review: Is the Core i3 the better choice?

Apple equips the entry-level SKU of the MacBook Air with a dual-core processor, but is the performance still sufficient in 2020? Or should you get a configurati...
Intel Core i3-1000NG4 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 13.30" | 1.3 kg
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5 Review: More Like a Surface Pro 6.5

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5 Review: More Like a Surface Pro 6.5

The Surface Pro 7 doesn't bring enough to the table to warrant a whole digit upgrade over the Surface Pro 6. Unless if you really value the integrated USB Type-...
Intel Core i5-1035G4 | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) | 12.30" | 1.1 kg

Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA-I58512G0R: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA-I58512G0R

Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363JA-EM189T: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363JA-EM189T

LG Gram 14Z90N-V.AR51B: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 14Z90N-V.AR51B

Lenovo ThinkBook 15-IIL-20SM001VMH: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 15-IIL-20SM001VMH

Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 13.3 NP930QCG-K01IT: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 13.3 NP930QCG-K01IT

Acer Swift 3 Air 2 SF313-52-72PM: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.50"
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 Air 2 SF313-52-72PM

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IIL05, i5-1035G4: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14IIL05, i5-1035G4

Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS

Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-58Q7: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-58Q7

Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-55UT: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-55UT

Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-58JN: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-58JN

Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15 NP950QCG-K01DE: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 15 NP950QCG-K01DE

Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IIL-20SL0022CK: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IIL-20SL0022CK

Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 13.3: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 13.3

Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-55T8: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-55T8

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0015ng: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0015ng

HP Spectre x360 13-aw0001nl: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » HP Spectre x360 13-aw0001nl

Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3: Intel Core i3-1000NG4, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3

Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-53GH: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Spin 3 SP314-54N-53GH

Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.50", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS

Lenovo Yoga S740-14IIL-81RS001DGE: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga S740-14IIL-81RS001DGE

Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL-81Q90020GE: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL-81Q90020GE

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 12.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4

Microsoft Surface Pro 7, i5-1035G4: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 12.30", 0.8 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro 7, i5-1035G4

Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 13.3: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.30", 1.2 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Book Flex 13.3: Minor improvements to be desired

Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS: Intel Core i5-1035G4, 13.50", 1.2 kg
   » Acer Swift 3 SF313-52-52AS: Should buyers rather choose the Core i5?

Apple MacBook Air 2020 i3: Intel Core i3-1000NG4, 13.30", 1.3 kg
   » The entry-level Apple MacBook Air is the better choice for many users

   » The Apple MacBook Air 2020 is 30% brighter when you use Windows

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Laptop GPU
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2019-06-13)