Notebookcheck

Counter-Strike Global Offensive Benchmarked

Florian Glaser (translated by Peter Krastev), 08/31/2012

CS reloaded. Over 10 years after the original, Global Offensive is a reboot of the successful multiplayer tactical shooter. Despite its age, the basic game idea is still very popular. The dusty Source Engine is both a curse and a blessing.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Currently wanted: 
News Editor - Details here

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (Artwork: Valve)

The Counter-Strike series spin-off will surely be discussed in great detail by its fan base. Is the visual update and the addition of a ton of features and game modes make Global Offensive the next step in evolution or is it just Valve trying to line their pockets? Certainly looks like we are talking about a rip-off as CS: GO costs 14 Euro (~$17) on Steam. This article focuses primarily on the technology and performance of different notebook graphics cards.

Description

Counter-Strike has conquered the hearts of so many gamers, not only because of its low hardware requirements, but also because of its team aspect and the tactical components. Thousands of players battle on the servers every day and some LAN parties are unthinkable without CS. Since the last part (CS: Source) has been out for a while, Valve saw that the time was right for a successor. Global Offensive is largely based on the same gaming principles and expands the multiplayer with a couple of new feature like the game modes ’Arms Race’ and ’Demolition’ (you automatically get a better weapon after a kill).

Many textures look blurred up close.
Many textures look blurred up close.
The weapons course is advisable for beginners.
The weapons course is advisable for beginners.
Counter-Strike was never popular among youth advocacy.
Counter-Strike was never popular among the youth.

In order not to fall easily in the heated online battles, beginners should first complete the ’Training camp’. The weapons handling, grenade use, and bomb placement are explained here. The ‘Single Player’ mode is right for those who want to try what they've learned. Global Offensive offers playing against bots whose level of difficulty can be adjusted in several steps. Those who feel ready to face a human player after the dry runs can enter a ’real’ server through the intuitive menus.

Planting a bomb still is one the key elements of the game.
Planting a bomb is still one the key elements of the game.
Global Offensive offers a lot of guns.
Global Offensive offers a lot of guns.
We are already familiar with a similar time course in Call of Duty.
We are already familiar with a similar time course in Call of Duty.

Benchmark

Benchmark route
The route for the benchmark

We had numerous reasons against an online benchmark. Since the threat of virtual death hangs on every second, the choice of an appropriate sequence would be quite hard and we did not want to ruin the round for other players. Due to the typical multi-player problems (lag influences the subjective game quality), we therefore preferred an offline skirmish with bots. At ’Harmless’ level, the AI hardy fights back.

The old mas shine in a new light.
The old maps shine in a new light.
There are many cover possibilities.
There are many possibilities for finding cover.
Money is the reward for success.
Money is the reward for success.

We tested one of the most played maps ’Dust II’. We begin the round as terrorists and more or less circle once around bomb sites A and B (see the screenshot and the video). The entire sequence takes about a minute and is recorded with the help of Fraps. During the run we wanted to ensure high comparability. Because of the less demanding technology, some fluctuations are inevitable.

Settings

Graphics options
Graphics options

The graphics options are typical for a PC game. In the video options one finds basic parameters such as resolution, aspect ratio, brightness and the size of the HUD (Head Up Display). The real thing is under the tab ’Advanced’. Not every title out there offers more than 10 different settings. Some options can ’only’ be turned on or off (Multicore-Rendering, FXAA, VSync & Motion Blur), while others can be adjusted at steps Very Low, Low, Medium, High and Very High. Among these are the shadow quality, the model, texture, effects and shader details as well as the ominous ’Paged Pool Memory’. The MSAA anti-aliasing reaches 8x and the anisotropic filtering about 16x which is something exemplary.

Ultra
Ultra
High
High
Medium
Medium
Low
Low

From a technical point of view, Global Offensive is unfortunately not outstanding. Despite the various improvements, the Source Engine seems rather outdated. In terms of polygon count and texture sharpness, the tactical shooter cannot compete with other FPSs like Max Payne 3Battlefield 3 and Crysis 2. Upon closer inspection, most wallpaper objects seem vague.

Ultra
Ultra
High
High
Medium
Medium
Low
Low

In comparison to CS: Source, this version is certainly an evident progress. Especially when it comes to atmosphere, Global Offensive takes a step forward. Thanks to the rich decorative objects, the levels now seem less dull. The successful lights and shadows help the ’Look and Feel’. Typical of Valve, there is attention for consistency of the look of the game. For next year though, we wish for a modern engine.

Ultra
Ultra
High
High
Medium
Medium
Low
Low

Quality journalism is made possible by advertising. We show the least amount of ads whenever possible. We intentionally show more ads when an adblocker is used. Please, switch off ad blockers.

Results

The moderate hardware requirement is one of the strong points of CS: GO. Even with Intel's older HD Graphics 3000, multiplayer mode is possible depending on the resolution at lower or normal settings. Midrange GPUs such as the GeForce GT 630M manage higher details and 2x anti-aliasing without problems. For 1920x1080 pixels, 4x anti-aliasing and maximum details (incl. FXAA), you do not need a high-end GPU at all. These settings are possible with the GeForce GT 640M. For the latest enthusiast-level GPUs like the Radeon HD 7970M  and the GeForce GTX 680M, Counter Strike does not seem to pose a challenge.

Counter Strike: Global Offensive Benchmark

Verdict

Valve seems to have optimized the technical framework perfectly. Global Offensive may not be visually exciting, but it scores points with its surprisingly low hardware requirements which come in handy mainly for weaker systems. The low price of 14 Euro is extremely fair and deserves some praise. 

Some maps are really idyllic.
Some maps are in idyllic settings.
The game has a great atmosphere.
The game has a great atmosphere.
Some level objects can be destroyed.
Some level objects can be destroyed.

Test Systems

Most of the devices come from Schenker Notebooks (mysn.de):

  • XMG P502 (Core i7-3610QM, GeForce GTX 660M, GTX 670M, GTX 675M, GTX 680M & Radeon HD 7970M, 8 GB RAM)
  • XMG A502 (Core i5-3360M, GeForce GT 650M & HD Graphics 4000, 8 GB RAM)
  • Xesia M501 (Core i7-2630QM, GeForce GT 630M & HD Graphics 3000, 8 GB RAM) 

The drivers used were versions: 304.79 Beta (Nvidia), 8.951.6.0 (AMD) and 8.15.10.2761 (Intel).

The Guild Wars 2 benchmark is planned for the end of August.

From left to right: Schenker XMG A502, Xesia M501 & XMG P502
From left to right: Schenker XMG A502, Xesia M501 & XMG P502

Overview

The chart below contains all previous benchmarks and will be expanded in the future.

Show Restrictions
Pos      Model                                     Counter-Strike: GO
 Counter-Strike: GO (2012)
low
1024x768
(Very) Low
med.
1366x768
Medium
high
1366x768
High
4xAF 2x MSAA
ultra
1920x1080
(Very) High, FXAA
8xAF 4x MSAA
 6NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
272
 22AMD Radeon R9 Fury
268
 32AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)
285
 51AMD Radeon R9 290X
280
 58NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
230
 64NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
124
 70NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
228
224
 71AMD Radeon HD 7970
251.1
233.8
212.6
212.2
 78NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
250
 90NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
246.3
220.8
198.9
191.6
 92NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
261.2
243.4
227
190.72
 102AMD Radeon HD 8970M
261.3
238.3
219.7
148.12
 108NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
230.8
194.7
169.3
128
 112AMD Radeon HD 7970M
228.8
200.1
178
121.452
 124AMD Radeon Pro 455
145
 126NVIDIA GeForce MX150
94
 132NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
261.8
244.2
224.5
150.9
 141NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
220.6
193.3
131
 147NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
98.9
Pos      Model                                     Counter-Strike: GO
lowmed.highultra
 154AMD Radeon HD 6870
189
 157NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
267.2
243.852
182.52
106.93
 166NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
208.3
167.9
153.8
102
 172AMD Radeon HD 7770
249.9
230.4
199
128.2
 173NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M SLI
246.9
218.7
199.7
138.7
 182AMD Radeon R9 M370X
265
218
159.3
103.4
 183NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
244.4
222.9
164.4
95.7
 185NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
230
171
98
 187NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
225.4
180.3
140.2
90.5
 193AMD Radeon HD 8870M
183.2
138.4
116.3
87.2
 206NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
226.5
189.7
142.2
88.5
 208AMD Radeon HD 8850M
101.9
78.1
 213AMD Radeon HD 8790M
149
116
73
 220NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
237.3
140.62
92.152
56.72
 224NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
182
156.8
107.2
57.9
 226*AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
120.7
95.8
67.3
41.9
 227NVIDIA GeForce 940M
168.1
141.1
112.6
68.1
 235NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
161.3
136.8
111.9
72.3
 238NVIDIA GeForce 840M
79.6
45.5
 240NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
176.4
124.9
59.8
Pos      Model                                     Counter-Strike: GO
lowmed.highultra
 245Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
240.4
181.3
88.4
51.9
 247NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
89.23
76.73
70.23
54.13
 250*Intel Iris Graphics 550
205.4
172.5
112.9
64.5
 260NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
109
86
 262NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
149.7
113.252
77.252
32
 276NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
157
128
92
52
 277NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
204.7
158.3
103.8
58.2
 280AMD Radeon HD 8750M
135
100.6
82.3
53.5
 287NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
129
99
84
49
 288AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
57.1
42.9
38
23.6
 294AMD Radeon R7 M360
88.9
87.3
65.8
43.8
 318Intel UHD Graphics 620
90
62.1
37.1
 319Intel HD Graphics 620
166.3
112.8
70.5
42.7
 320AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
74.7
64
50.2
31.3
 334AMD Radeon HD 8730M
142.4
105.2
83.4
48.8
 336NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
166.9
117.2
81.6
35.9
 359AMD Radeon HD 7660D
54
 377AMD Radeon HD 8650G
46.8
42.2
36
42
 381AMD Radeon HD 7670M
139.652
96.92
752
45.752
 382NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
139.23
97.93
65.63
35.43
Pos      Model                                     Counter-Strike: GO
lowmed.highultra
 383AMD Radeon HD 7560D
79
45
 385AMD Radeon R5 M335
108.7
68.1
48.3
26.4
 386AMD Radeon R5 M330
125
73.3
50.3
 390NVIDIA GeForce 910M
39.1
36.3
34.2
29.7
 391NVIDIA GeForce 820M
135
105.8
78.7
 393Intel HD Graphics 520
115.13
76.93
56.43
29.93
 394Intel Iris Graphics 6100
112.5
81.2
63
32.8
 395NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
107.2
88.2
56.8
 396AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
39.2
28.5
25
 409AMD Radeon HD 8550M
38.7
33.6
29.4
 410Intel Iris Graphics 5100
144.9
80.1
51.7
30.8
 415Intel HD Graphics 4600
186.9
99.2
52.252
27.152
 417Intel HD Graphics 5500
713
51.33
36.23
19.73
 424*Intel HD Graphics 615
99.9
57.3
39.5
21.9
 430AMD Radeon HD 7660G
58
39
 446ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
101.6
87
70.1
39.1
 449AMD Radeon HD 8550G
39
 456AMD Radeon HD 7610M
176
99
70
38
 465Intel HD Graphics 515
76.7
57.3
35.1
20.2
 466Intel HD Graphics 4400
903
563
413
Pos      Model                                     Counter-Strike: GO
lowmed.highultra
 467*Intel HD Graphics 610
94.2
70.4
42.8
 471AMD Radeon HD 7550M
133.3
75
56.9
 479AMD Radeon HD 7600G
48
31.8
24.8
 497Intel HD Graphics 5300
623
49.73
25.13
19.83
 499*Intel HD Graphics 505
35.852
30.952
21.2
 507AMD Radeon HD 7480D
82
73
50
27.1
 508Intel HD Graphics 4000
78.156
46.86
26.76
20.93
 512AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
29.7
21.9
17.8
 513*AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
27.9
19.8
16.7
13.2
 514*Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell)
43.7
31.5
23.9
 516AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)
35.4
35.3
27.6
 517AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
48.3
42.2
30.6
21.5
 518AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
52.8
40.8
28.5
 519AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
26.9
21.7
20
 520Intel HD Graphics 4200
70.7
35.5
18.9
12.5
 522AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
134.3
81.2
54.1
29.4
 529AMD Radeon HD 8450G
45
33.5
26.4
33
 533AMD Radeon HD 8400
60
47
33.7
19.3
 536NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
75
68
38
 537AMD Radeon HD 7520G
61.4
44.4
37.1
Pos      Model                                     Counter-Strike: GO
lowmed.highultra
 547AMD Radeon HD 8330
43.252
35.252
26.8
 549Intel HD Graphics 500
14
 569Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
42.6
32
20.4
 570Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
12.2
11.5
10.4
 575AMD Radeon HD 7420G
52
39
31
 580Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
46.2
34.7
22.5
 600*AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
43.6
34.5
 601Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
21.63
18.63
20.3
11.4
 611AMD Radeon HD 8240
21.1
19.2
 613AMD Radeon HD 8250
17.4
14.3
11.9
 619Intel HD Graphics 3000
60.62
37.42
16.652
10.6
 622NVIDIA GeForce G210M
63
43
29
14
 637AMD Radeon HD 8210
19.3
 640Intel HD Graphics 2500
79.52
37.52
19.32
11.7
 641Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
37
20
11
 675*Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
60
30.3
18.8
9.7
 682Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
36.352
21.952
 736Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
16.2
9
6.8
* Smaller values are better. / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
123Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.
Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > Counter-Strike Global Offensive Benchmarked
Florian Glaser, 2012-08-31 (Update: 2013-06- 6)