Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M is a relatively fast middle-class graphics card for laptops. Currently, it can be based on three different chips with different specifications and performance values. The GF108 version (a renamed GT 540M) features 96 shaders while the GF106/GF116 version (a renamed GT 550M) features 144 shaders. Furthermore, the newer 28nm Fermi-based GF117 variant will be available as well with significantly reduced power consumption. All models feature a 128 Bit memory interface for DDR3 graphics memory. As part of the Fermi architecture, the cards support DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.0. 

Architecture

More details on the GF108 and GF106/116 architecture can be found on the dedicated pages of the GeForce GT 435M and GeForce GT 555M. Details on the GF117 can be found on the GeForce GT 620M page.

Performance

The performance of the 96 shader version should be exactly like the GeForce GT 540M and the 144 shader version like the GeForce GT 555M (see both gaming benchmark pages). Demanding games of 2010 should therefore run fluently in medium to high details. However, certain 2011 games like Anno 2070 or Skyrim may need reduced detail settings for fluent framerates. The GF117 version can be clocked up to 800 MHz and therefore performs similar to the average GT 555M. However, exact clock rates differ between laptop models and manufacturers; the overall performance is somewhere between a GT 540M and GT 555M.

Features

A novelty of the GF104, GF106 and GF108 chips is the support for Bitstream HD Audio (Blu-Ray) via HDMI. Similar to the Radeon HD 5730, the GT 630M can transfer Dolby True HD and DTS-HD bitstream without quality loss to a HiFi receiver.

The GT 630M offers PureVideo HD technology for video decoding using the GPU. The integrated Video Processor 4 (VP4) supports feature set C and is able to fully decode MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 Part 2 (MPEG-4 ASP - e.g., DivX or Xvid), VC-1/WMV9, and H.264 (VLD, IDCT, Motion Compensation, and Deblocking). Furthermore, the GPU is able to decode two 1080p streams simultaneously (e.g., for Blu-Ray Picture-in-Picture).

Through CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectCompute 2.1 support, the GeForce GT 630M can assist in general calculations. For example, the stream processor can encode videos considerably faster than can a modern CPU. Furthermore, physics calculations can be done by the GPU using PhysX (supported in Mafia 2 and Metro 2033). However, the GPU is not powerful enough to support both PhysX and high detail game settings at reasonable frame rates.

Following the current 3D trend, the 630M supports 3D Vision. This enables the laptop to send 3D content (3D games, 3D Web Streaming, 3D photos, 3D Blu-Rays) to a built-in 3D enabled screen or an external 3D TV if supported by the laptop manufacturer. This feature is disabled if the notebook includes Optimus.

The power consumption of the GeForce GT 630M should be similar to the GeForce GT 435M or Radeon HD 5730 and is therefore suited for 15" or larger laptops. If idle or not under load, the chip is clocked at approximately 50/101/137 MHz (chip/shader/memory, respectively) in 2D mode and at 202/405/324 MHz in 3D mode to save power. Furthermore, the 600M series supports Optimus to automatically switch between the integrated Intel graphics card and the Nvidia GPU. The implementation of Optimus, however, is dependent on the laptop manufacturer.

GeForce GT 600M Series

GeForce GT 650M SLI compare 768 @ 0.79 - 0.84 GHz2x 128 Bit @ 4000 MHz
GeForce GT 650M compare 384 @ 0.74 - 0.9 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 - 4000 MHz
GeForce GT 645M compare 384 @ 0.71 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 640M compare 384 @ 0.63 - 0.65 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 - 4000 MHz
GeForce GT 640M LE compare 384 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 - 4000 MHz
GeForce GT 635M compare 144 @ 0.66 - 0.75 GHz128/192 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 630M 96 @ 0.67 GHz128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 625M compare 96 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce GT 620M compare 96 @ 0.63 - 0.72 GHz64 / 128 Bit @ 1800 MHz
CodenameN13P-GL/GL2
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines96 - unified
Core Speed672 MHz
Shader Speed1344 MHz
Memory Speed1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.0
Power Consumption35 Watt
technology28 nm
FeaturesOptimus Support, PureVideo HD VP4, 3D Vision, 3DTV Play, Bitstream HD Audio, CUDA, DirectCompute, OpenCL, OpenGL 4.0, DirectX 11
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement06.12.2011

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.3 pt (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 3985     avg: 4824     median: 4641 (5%)     max: 6030 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 5344     avg: 5614     median: 5577 (1%)     max: 5959 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 670     avg: 719     median: 674 (1%)     max: 812 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 706     avg: 757     median: 719 (1%)     max: 847 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 45106     avg: 54203     median: 54087 (6%)     max: 63530 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 959     avg: 1173     median: 1168 (2%)     max: 1336 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 851     avg: 1039     median: 1035 (1%)     max: 1218 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 3914     avg: 4895     median: 4868.5 (1%)     max: 5567 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 3112     avg: 4005     median: 3985 (2%)     max: 4479 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 12336     avg: 14217     median: 14216.5 (15%)     max: 16097 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 18789     avg: 21703     median: 22237 (12%)     max: 23674 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 11854     avg: 16128     median: 16081 (18%)     max: 18286 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 5476     avg: 8532     median: 8610 (11%)     max: 9832 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 14.3     avg: 16.6     median: 16.3 (3%)     max: 24.1 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 2.09     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (2%)     max: 3 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 0.83     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (1%)     max: 0.99 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 7.16     avg: 8.4     median: 8.2 (6%)     max: 9.92 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 1.08     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.16 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 9.62     avg: 10.2     median: 10.1 (8%)     max: 10.82 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 12.81     avg: 13.9     median: 13.7 (15%)     max: 15.38 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 11.07     avg: 11.8     median: 11.4 (5%)     max: 13.08 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 3.97     avg: 4.3     median: 4.2 (2%)     max: 4.65 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 4.6     avg: 6.5     median: 6.7 (85%)     max: 6.7 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 3.4     avg: 5.9     median: 6.4 (81%)     max: 6.7 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4567     avg: 5690     median: 5865 (4%)     max: 6333 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 12.2     avg: 25     median: 25 (9%)     max: 31.4 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
33.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
61.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
40.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
21.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
39.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium (Render Scale 100 %) 2xAF FXAA 1920x1080
16.8
low 1280x720
12.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
14.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
30  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
18.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
73  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1366x768
46  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
59.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
20.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
116  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
73  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
110  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
52.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
16.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
29.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
22.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
11.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
31.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
83  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
17.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
14.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
4.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1366x768
26.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
15  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
low 1280x720
59  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
42  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
47  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
141  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
32.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
68  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
23.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
46.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
24.4 27.7 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.4 21.8 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
41.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
32 33 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
54  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2013

F1 2013

2013
low 1024x768
96 102 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60 62 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46 48 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17 17 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Fifa 14

Fifa 14

2013
low 1024x768
274.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
164.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
122 127.3 ~ 125 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
70.6 71.4 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
52 53.3 ~ 53 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.7 39 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29.5 31 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.2 7.5 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
41 42.9 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.3 34.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14 15.7 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.5 9.4 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
48.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
47.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
low 1024x768
77.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38 40.8 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.9 17.7 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
16.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
7.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
93.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
32.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
25.3 31.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.2 23 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11 11.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.6 5.9 ~ 6 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
56.7 65 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.2 36 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27.3 31.8 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.4 9.8 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
204.6 255 ~ 230 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60.4 69 ~ 65 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
34.4 38.3 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.8 13.4 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
SimCity

SimCity

2013
low 1024x768
27.3 31.2 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.7 19.4 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13.8 16 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.7 9 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
62 74.1 76.4 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.1 36.7 38.1 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20.3 20.8 23.4 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.2 7.3 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
30.6 35.2 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.2 19.3 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.6 12.8 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.1 4.8 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
115.1 127 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.6 59 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36.1 42.8 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.6 23.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Far Cry 3

Far Cry 3

2012
low 1024x768
48.9 61.1 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.3 35.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.7 17.8 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.6 5.5 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
med. 1366x768
33.4 34 36 41 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24 28 30 34.6 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4 8.8 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
35.5 40.9 48.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.2 27 30.7 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
11.6 13.5 15.5 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.8 5.4 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
48.5 63.9 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.7 49.4 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
23.2 28.3 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.5 17.8 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
47.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
37.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
19.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
66.2 79 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
54.5 65 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
49.5 58 ~ 54 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.2 32.8 ~ 31 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
47.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
141 243.2 245 249 318 ~ 239 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
115 135.9 144 147 189 ~ 146 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
105 115 116.9 121 145 ~ 121 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
66.2 70 85 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2012

F1 2012

2012
low 1024x768
71 83 98 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
59 68 76 ~ 68 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
43 49 61 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18 21 22 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
57.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Torchlight 2

Torchlight 2

2012
low 1024x768
79  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
67.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
46 64 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.3 22.3 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7 8 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
125 139.2 153 ~ 139 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
96.5 97.9 118 ~ 104 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
64.5 65.6 83 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.9 35.4 45 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
med. 1366x768
38.4 44 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.2 24 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
60.4 64.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
43.7 44.4 47.7 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.5 16.5 17.8 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 5.1 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
35  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
32.3 34.8 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12 18 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35.2 37 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.3 37 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
10.1 12.6 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.9 9.7 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
43 56.5 76.6 87.8 91 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
20.2 36.9 46.7 51.6 56.5 59 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14.3 28.6 29.5 31.6 35 35.3 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10 12 12.4 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
79.8 90 91.6 92 92 92 92 93 94 95 104.3 105 108.9 113 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.4 46.6 50 52 64 65 65.5 65.5 67 67 67 67 68 68.3 72 72.8 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
28.6 32 33 42 43.9 46 46 46 46 47 51.1 52.5 54 56 57.2 60 64 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.3 23 23 23 23 23 23 30.9 30.9 31.9 33 49 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
31.7 37 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.7 23 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.2 18 ~ 18 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1 9 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
52.7 53 59 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
38.6 39.6 42.1 42.6 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.9 22.1 25.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
26.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Star Wars: The Old Republic

Star Wars: The Old Republic

2011
low 1024x768
62.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
60.2 75.9 76 79 79 80 81.9 82 84 84 84 84 93.1 95.5 95.7 105 ~ 84 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
26.3 28 29.7 30 31 32 32 32 32 32 32.2 32.9 34 35.9 36 36 36.6 40.9 42 43.7 52.1 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
17.5 18 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20.5 20.5 22.9 23 23.9 24 24.3 25.4 26.1 27.3 38.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
10 10 11 11.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
29 39.2 40.9 42.1 43 43 43 43 46.1 46.8 52.3 53.4 ~ 43 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
27.9 28 29.3 29.9 31 31 31 31 31 32.9 33.8 36.3 36.9 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
19.1 19.8 20.1 22 22.4 23 23 23 23 23.9 25 25.3 26.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.2 12.7 13.5 13.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
148.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
60.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
34.3 35.7 37.2 41.6 42.4 44.3 ~ 39 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
20 21.7 22.6 23.8 23.8 26.8 28.3 ~ 24 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
15 15.2 16.4 17.4 17.8 19.8 21.6 ~ 18 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
77  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.8 60 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
17.1 23 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
59.9 251.3 301 335.6 375.2 ~ 265 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
59.6 113.2 154 161.8 165.7 196.2 217.8 ~ 153 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
57.3 87.1 103.8 104.9 110.4 110.8 122.4 141 ~ 105 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
63.3 80.1 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
90 91 110 ~ 97 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
60 60 73 ~ 64 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
37 39 44 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14 15 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
60 60.2 100.9 104.8 115.2 120.2 ~ 94 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36 37 37 40.9 46.7 46.8 47.6 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.4 16.6 16.6 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
122.8 149.3 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
62.7 75 ~ 69 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
39.4 48.2 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
29  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
56.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
37.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
27.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 800x600
90.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
62.6  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
51.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
43.4 56 60.8 61.8 71.4 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
29.7 45.1 45.1 45.2 48.2 55.2 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
24 33 37 39 41.5 47.1 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24.9  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
91 111 124 135 192 196.3 198.7 252.6 254.8 ~ 173 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
42 43.5 45 47.5 49 54.2 55.5 57.7 58 63 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
26 28.4 29 31 35.1 35.6 36.2 36.8 41 41 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19 19.5 20.2 23 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 800x600
46.6 49.2 50.8 51.1 100.7 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
25.8 29.1 29.7 31.2 50.3 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
16.1 22.7 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
118  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
64.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
47.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
62.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
47.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
103.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
35.7 40.8 42.4 43.5 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.4 26.5 27.6 29.5 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
ultra 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
79.2 81.6 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
34.5 35 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
med. 1024x768
68  fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
35  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
153 158 ~ 156 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
64.7 68.3 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17.9 17.9 21.6 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
198 198 198 198 202 202 ~ 199 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
148 155 155 155 155 163 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
48 48 48 48 51 58 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Team Fortress 278
Dirt 433.9
Rocket League61.929.118.5
Farming Simulator 1740.318
Mirror's Edge Catalyst21.2
Overwatch39.628
Need for Speed 201612.7
Hitman 201612.1
Far Cry Primal15
Rise of the Tomb Raider14.2
Rainbow Six Siege3018.89.96.9
Assassin's Creed Syndicate8.1
Fallout 418.3
FIFA 16733523
World of Warships4630.415.311.1
Metal Gear Solid V59.239.414.7
Mad Max20.2
Dota 2 Reborn1167323.321.5
The Witcher 312.1
Dirt Rally11029.214.5
GTA V52.335.98.4
Battlefield Hardline2918.58.95.5
Evolve16.2126.3
The Crew29.920.7
Dragon Age: Inquisition2617
Far Cry 422.216.3
Assassin's Creed Unity11.6
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare31.316.8
Civilization: Beyond Earth35.6137.76.7
F1 201483543015
The Evil Within17.611.96.9
Ryse: Son of Rome14.19.64.6
Alien: Isolation26.313.89.8
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor2615
Fifa 15594228.7
Risen 3: Titan Lords4726.49.57.9
GRID: Autosport1414719.412.5
Watch Dogs2816.8
Wolfenstein: The New Order35.832.112.2
The Elder Scrolls Online6837.526.213.7
Assassin´s Creed IV: Black Flag23.818.110.65.2
X-Plane 10.2546.615.56.94.5
Need for Speed: Rivals2621
Call of Duty: Ghosts41.826.814.96.4
Battlefield 43321.114.86.3
Batman: Arkham Origins54372010
F1 201399614717
Fifa 14274.1164.412571
Total War: Rome II5339306
Saints Row IV4233159
The Bureau: XCOM Declassified48.725.711.36.6
Splinter Cell: Blacklist47.532.513.8
Dota 277.73917
Company of Heroes 216.113.27.23
GRID 293.447.432.212.5
Metro: Last Light2821116
BioShock Infinite6134309
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm230653613
SimCity2918158
Tomb Raider7136227
Crysis 33318124
Dead Space 3121553922
Far Cry 35532175
Assassin´s Creed III36298
Hitman: Absolution4228145
Call of Duty: Black Ops 256442616
Need for Speed: Most Wanted47.927.716.69.4
Medal of Honor: Warfighter37.124.719.47.9
Dishonored73605431
World of Tanks v847.622.717.99.7
Fifa 1323914612174
F1 201284685120
Borderlands 257.140.327.715.5
Torchlight 27967.648.1
Guild Wars 255208
Counter-Strike: GO1391047138
Darksiders II4123
Sleeping Dogs6245175
The Secret World3525.317.35.8
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier34158.2
Max Payne 33633119
Dirt Showdown71452911
Diablo III96634728
Risen 2: Dark Waters3422189
Mass Effect 3554123
Alan Wake26.919.28.1
Star Wars: The Old Republic62.427.118.4
Anno 207084352211
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim43322313
CoD: Modern Warfare 3148.960.136.421.7
Battlefield 33924188.3
Batman: Arkham City775920
Fifa 1226515310572
F1 201197644015
Deus Ex Human Revolution944217
Dirt 3136694414.94
The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings2918
Crysis 256.737.427.1
Call of Duty: Black Ops90.862.651.2
Mafia 259453724.9
StarCraft 2173523420
Metro 2033603319
Dawn of War II - Chaos Rising11864.447.421.42
Battlefield: Bad Company 262.547.433.4
Risen103.34127
Resident Evil 531.2
Colin McRae: DIRT 21218035
Sims 36835
Trackmania Nations Forever1566719
World of Warcraft19915550
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
25
37
28
13
38
34
15
4
53
25
3
2
63
4
3






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 03:12:33

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.045s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2804 +0.026s ... 0.071s

#7 got single benchmarks 2804 +0.098s ... 0.169s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.169s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.619s ... 0.787s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.787s

#11 Got 788 rows for game benchmarks. +0.039s ... 0.826s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.826s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.06s ... 0.886s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +2.815s ... 3.701s

#15 return log +0.04s ... 3.742s

League of Legends (LoL)

Recording the fps during a 5 vs 5 game in League of Legends 5.3 with the settings 1920x1080, maximum details and anti-aliasing we achieved an average of 30-50fps. The game was well playable but the frame drops down to 5 fps were sometimes noticable. However, the Asus N56VM was equipped with a rather slow HDD and this could played a part in the stuttering.

League of Legends 5.3 in 1080p, maximum settings with anti-aliasing. Tested with a Asus N56VM with i7-3720QM and a HDD.
League of Legends 5.3 in 1080p, maximum settings with anti-aliasing. Tested with a Asus N56VM with i7-3720QM and a HDD.

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M graphics card

 

Review HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15-b004sg Ultrabook

All-round ultrabook. Hewlett Packard now has a slim, 15.6 inch ultrabook that even allows playing up-to-date 3D games in its product line. Storage is not an iss...
Intel Core i5-3317U | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | 15.60" | 2.1 kg
 

Review Packard Bell EasyNote LV44HC Notebook

All in white and ready to entertain. A pretty design, a bit of gaming, and a bargain price - that's a quick summary of the Packard Bell Easynote LV44HC-137GE. H...
Intel Core i5-3210M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | 17.30" | 3.3 kg
 

Review Dell Inspiron 15z (5523) Ultrabook

Inspiring. Ultrabooks have found their way into Dell's Inspiron family. The all-rounders of the past now benefit from lower weight and longer battery life, in a...
Intel Core i5-3317U | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | 15.60" | 2.2 kg
 

Review HP Envy dv7-7202eg Notebook

Conquering the desktop. The premium HP Envy dv7-7200 makes a bid at being the go-to entertainment center. This 1200 Euro (~$1600) device is put through its pace...
Intel Core i7-3630QM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | 17.30" | 3.3 kg
 

Review HP Envy dv6-7202eg Notebook

Display Surprise. Full HD display, Blu-ray burner, 1 TB HDD, 16 GB RAM, quad-core CPU - HP packs the top model of the new Envy dv6 series to the limit. So does ...
Intel Core i7-3630QM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M | 15.60" | 2.5 kg

Lenovo IdeaPad G780 (M843MGE): Intel Core i5-3210M, 17.30", 3 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo G780 Notebook

Samsung Serie 7 700Z3C-S01: Intel Core i5-3210M, 14.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Review Update Samsung Series 7 700Z3C-S01 Notebook

HP Pavilion dv7-7000sg: Intel Core i5-2450M, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  Review » Review HP Pavilion dv7-7000sg Notebook

Lenovo IdeaPad Z580-M81EAGE: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo IdeaPad Z580 Notebook

Dell Vostro 3460: Intel Core i5-3210M, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  Review » Review Dell Vostro 3460 Notebook

Toshiba Satellite P875-30E: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 17.30", 3 kg
  Review » Review Toshiba Satellite P875-30E (P870-30E) Notebook

Dell XPS 14-L421X: Intel Core i7-3517U, 14.00", 2.1 kg
  Review » Review Dell XPS 14 Ultrabook

Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530, Sandy Bridge: Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530 (NZQBQGE) Notebook

Samsung 550P5C-T02DE: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  Review » Review Samsung Series 5 550P5C-T02 Notebook

Asus K55VM-SX064V: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  Review » Review Asus K55VM-SX064V Notebook

Asus N56VM: Intel Core i7-3720QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  Review » Update review Asus N56VM Notebook with GT 630M

Asus N76VM-V2G-T1078V: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  Review » Review Asus N76VM-V2G-T1078V Notebook

Asus A95VM-YZ030V: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 18.40", 4.1 kg
  Review » Review Asus A95VM-YZ030V (K95V) Notebook

Asus K93SM-YZ085V: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 18.40", 4.1 kg
  Review » Review Asus K93SM-YZ085V Notebook

Packard Bell EasyNote TS13HR-197GE: Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Packard Bell EasyNote TS13HR-197GE Notebook

Acer TravelMate 5760G-2454G50Mnsk: Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  Review » Review Acer TravelMate 5760G-2454G50Mnsk Notebook

Acer Aspire 5755G-2678G1TMtks: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  Review » Review Acer Aspire 5755G Notebook

Toshiba Satellite P845t-10Q: Intel Core i5-3337U, 14.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P845t-10Q

Dell Vostro 5460: Intel Core i5-3337U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 5460

Lenovo IdeaPad P580-59370041: Intel Core i5-3230M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad P580-59370041

Dell Vostro 3460: Intel Core i5-3210M, 14.00", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 3460

HP Pavilion TouchSmart 14-b169tx: Intel Core i5-3337U, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion TouchSmart 14-b169tx

HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15-b050sw: Intel Core i5-3317U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15-b050sw

Toshiba Satellite U940-103: Intel Core i5-3317U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite U940-103

Acer TravelMate P453-MG-33114G50Mikk: Intel Core i3-3110M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate P453-MG-33114G50Mikk

Toshiba Satellite P845t-10C: Intel Core i5-3337U, 14.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P845t-10C

HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15-b020sw: Intel Core i3-3217U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15-b020sw

Acer Aspire V3-771G-53214G75: Intel Core i5-3210M, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-771G-53214G75

Samsung 700Z3C-S05DE: Intel Core i5-3210M, 14.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Samsung 700Z3C-S05DE

HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15-b004sg Ultrabook: Intel Core i5-3317U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15-b004sg Ultrabook

HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15-b003sm: Intel Core i5-3317U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15-b003sm

Lenovo IdeaPad G780-M842QGE: Intel Pentium B960, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad G780-M842QGE

Toshiba Satellite P845T-10N: Intel Core i5-3337U, 14.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P845T-10N

HP Envy dv6-7206tx: Intel Core i7-3630QM, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Envy dv6-7206tx

HP Envy dv7-7210em: Intel Core i7-3630QM, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy dv7-7210em

Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530-N4F27GE: Intel Core i3-3110M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530-N4F27GE

HP Envy dv7-7230sw: Intel Core i7-3630QM, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy dv7-7230sw

Dell Inspiron 15z Premium: Intel Core i5-3317U, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15z Premium

Acer Aspire V3-771G-9809: Intel Core i7-3630QM, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-771G-9809

Lenovo IdeaPad G780 (M843MGE): Intel Core i5-3210M, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad G780 (M843MGE)

Lenovo IdeaPad G580AH-4984: Intel Core i3-3110M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad G580AH-4984

Samsung 550P5C-T01US: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung 550P5C-T01US

Asus U32V: Intel Core i5-3210M, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus U32V

Samsung 550P5C-T01RS: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung 550P5C-T01RS

Dell Inspiron 17R-5720: Intel Core i5-3210M, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 17R-5720

Dell XPS 15-9375sLV: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 15-9375sLV

Dell XPS 14-9092sLV: Intel Core i5-3317U, 14.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 14-9092sLV

Toshiba Satellite P855-30F: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P855-30F

Toshiba Satellite P855-32G: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P855-32G

HP Envy dv7-7200sg: Intel Core i5-3210M, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » HP Envy dv7-7200sg

Dell Inspiron 15z-5523: Intel Core i5-3317U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15z-5523

Packard Bell EasyNote LV44HC-140GE: Intel Core i5-3210M, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote LV44HC-140GE

Dell Inspiron 17R (5720): Intel Core i5-3210M, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 17R (5720)

Dell XPS 15-n00x1507: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 15-n00x1507

Asus K45VM: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 14.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus K45VM

Toshiba Satellite P875-300: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P875-300

HP Pavilion dv7-7099el: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-7099el

Asus N56VM-S3113V: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus N56VM-S3113V

Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530, Sandy Bridge: Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530, Sandy Bridge

Acer Aspire M3-581TG-72634G52Mnkk: Intel Core i7-2637M, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire M3-581TG-72634G52Mnkk

Acer Aspire V3-571G-6641: Intel Core i3-2370M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-571G-6641

Acer Aspire V3-571G-6602: Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-571G-6602

Lenovo IdeaPad Z580-59-332437: Intel Core i3-2350M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Z580-59-332437

Acer Aspire V3-571G-53218G50Makk: Intel Core i5-3210M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-571G-53218G50Makk

Asus X53SM-SO184V: Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus X53SM-SO184V

Medion Akoya P6635-MD98068: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya P6635-MD98068

Lenovo IdeaPad Z580-M81DFUK: Intel Core i7-3612QM, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Z580-M81DFUK

HP Pavilion dv6-7030tx: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv6-7030tx

HP Pavilion dv7-6c55sa: Intel Core i5-2450M, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-6c55sa

Asus N76VM-V2G-T1078V: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Asus N76VM-V2G-T1078V

Lenovo V480-5933-5448: Intel Core i7-3612QM, 14.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo V480-5933-5448

Asus U32VD: Intel Core i5-3210M, 13.30", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus U32VD

Toshiba Satellite P850-138: Intel Core i3-2350M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P850-138

HP Pavilion g6-2008tx: Intel Core i3-2350M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion g6-2008tx

HP Pavilion dv7-7099ef: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-7099ef

Asus A95VM-YZ030V: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 18.40", 4.1 kg
  External Review » Asus A95VM-YZ030V

Dell XPS 14-L421X: Intel Core i7-3517U, 14.00", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 14-L421X

Acer Aspire V3-571G-53214G75Makk: Intel Core i3-2310M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire V3-571G-53214G75Makk

Asus K55VM-SX064V: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus K55VM-SX064V

Toshiba Satellite P875-102: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P875-102

Asus A45V: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 14.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus A45V

Asus K75: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Asus K75

Asus K55: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Asus K55

HP Pavilion dv7-7071sf: Intel Core i5-2450M, 17.30", 3 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv7-7071sf

Asus N56VM-S4032V: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N56VM-S4032V

HP Pavilion dv6-7090sf: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » HP Pavilion dv6-7090sf

Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530, Ivy Bridge: Intel Core i7-3612QM, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530, Ivy Bridge

Asus N76: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  External Review » Asus N76

Asus N46VM: Intel Core i5-3210M, 14.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Asus N46VM

Asus K75VM: Intel Core i7-3610QM, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Asus K75VM

Medion Akoya P6634 (MD98930): Intel Core i3-2350M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya P6634 (MD98930)

Asus N56VM: Intel Core i7-3720QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N56VM

Medion Akoya P6633 (MD97958): Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya P6633 (MD97958)

Asus K93SM-YZ085V: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 18.40", 4.1 kg
  External Review » Asus K93SM-YZ085V

Asus N53SM-DS71: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Asus N53SM-DS71

Medion Akoya P7624-MD98920: Intel Core i3-2350M, 17.10", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya P7624-MD98920

Acer Aspire 5755G-2454G50Mtbs: Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5755G-2454G50Mtbs

Packard Bell EasyNote TS44-HR-151GE: Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote TS44-HR-151GE

Asus N53SM: Intel Core i5-2520M, 15.60", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Asus N53SM

Acer TravelMate 5760G-2454G50Mnsk: Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Acer TravelMate 5760G-2454G50Mnsk

Acer Aspire 5755G-2678G1TMtks: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 5755G-2678G1TMtks

Packard Bell EasyNote TS13HR-197GE: Intel Core i5-2450M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Packard Bell EasyNote TS13HR-197GE

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter