Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M is a fast middle class graphics card for laptops. Depending on the version, it is based on the GF108, GF116 or GF106 architecture with different shader counts, clock speeds and memory configurations. It stems from the Fermi generation and supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.0.

Versions (From highest to lowest performance):

  1. 144 cores 709MHz (GF106), 128Bit GDDR5, e.g. MSI GX780
  2. 144 cores 590MHz (GF106), 192Bit DDR3, e.g. Dell XPS 17Alienware M14x
  3. 144 cores 590MHz (GF106), 128Bit DDR3, e.g. Schenker XMG A501 / A701 (Clevo W150HRM / W170HN)
  4. 96 cores 753MHz (GF108), 128Bit GDDR5, e.g. Lenovo Y570p / Y560p
  5. 144 cores 525 MHz (GF116), 128 Bit DDR3, e.g. Medion Akoya P6812

GF106 architecture

The GF106 core of the GTX 555M is related to the GF100 core of the GeFore GTX 480M and offers 192 shaders and a 192 Bit memory bus for GDDR5. The GT 555M offers only 144 shaders and in some variants and a smaller memory bus with DDR3. Except for the memory controllers, the GF106 can basically be considered a halved GF104. Therefore, the architecture is not comparable to the old GT215 (e.g., GeForce GTS 350M) or GT216 (e.g., GeForce GT 330M) cores.

Unlike the GF100, the smaller GF104, GF106, and GF108 cores have been both shortened and considerably modified. In contrast to the GF100, which was designed for professional applications, these latter chips target the consumer market. They feature more shaders (3x16 instead of 2x16) and more texture units (8 instead of 4) and SFUs per streaming multi-processor (SM). Since there are still only 2 warp schedulers (versus 3 shader groups), Nvidia now uses superscalar execution to use the higher amount of shaders per SM more efficiently. In theory, the shaders can be utilized more efficiently and the performance per core can be improved.

However, it's worth noting that the performance of the GF106 can also be worse than the GF100 (and its predecessors) in worst case scenarios. The ECC memory protection, which is important for professional applications, was completely omitted and the FP64 hardware was shortened (only 1/3 of the shader are FP64-capable and thereby only 1/12 of the FP32’s performance). Because of these cutbacks, the size of the SM  grew only by 25% despite the higher number of shaders and larger warp schedulers with superscalar dispatch capabilities. Due to the different shader architectures and the higher clock rate of the shader domain, the core count of the Nvidia chip cannot be directly compared to AMD cores of the Radeon 5000 series (e.g. HD 5830).

Detailed information on the GF104 architecture (and by extension also the GF106 and GF108) can be found in the desktop GTX 460 article by Anandtech.

The GF114 and GF116 chips are slightly reworked chips that were introduced in 2011. Due to a changed transistor design, the clock rates were raised while maintaining more or less the same power consumption levels.

Performance

The performance of the GT 555M is highly dependent on the version of the card (see above). The 3DMark 06 performance, for example, ranges from 8857 points (Lenovo Ideapad Y570) to 13000 points (MSI GX780R). For all intents and purposes, the GT 555M in the Lenovo is therefore essentially a fast GeForce 550M. The average GT 555M (with 144 shaders) is positioned in the lower high end class and enables users to play demanding games in high settings at 1366x768. Only Metro 2033 had to be played in lower settings during our benchmark tests (see below).

Features

A feature of the GF104/106/108 chips is the support for Bitstream HD Audio (Blu-Ray) output via HDMI. Similar to the Radeon HD 5730, the GT 555M can transfer Dolby True HD and DTS-HD bitstream-wise without quality loss to a HiFi receiver.

The GT 555M offers PureVideo HD technology for video decoding. The included Video Processor 4 (VP4) supports feature set C and allows the GPU to fully decode MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 Part 2 (MPEG-4 ASP - e.g., DivX or Xvid), VC-1/WMV9, and H.264 (VLD, IDCT, Motion Compensation, and Deblocking). 

Furthermore, the GPU is able to decode two 1080p streams simultaneously (e.g., for Blu-Ray Picture-in-Picture).

Through CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectCompute 2.1 support, the GeForce GT 555M can be of help in general calculations. For example, the stream processor can encode videos considerably faster than can a modern CPU. Furthermore, physics calculations can be done by the GPU using PhysX if supported, such as in Mafia 2 or Metro 2033.

According to Nvidia, the GT 555M supports 3D Vision. It enables the laptop to send 3D content (3D games, 3D Web Streaming, 3D photos, 3D Blu-Rays) to a built-in 3D-enabled screen or an external 3D TV if supported by the laptop manufacturer and when not in conjunction with Optimus.

The relatively high power consumption of the GeForce GT 555M suits it for larger laptops from 14-17". To save power, the card supports Optimus for automatic switching between the integrated graphics card from Intel and the Nvidia GPU. Even though the video card natively supports this feature, its implementation is fully dependent on the notebook manufacturer.

GeForce GT 500M Series

GeForce GT 555M 144 @ 0.53 - 0.75 GHz128, 192 Bit @ 785-900 MHz
GeForce GT 550M compare 96 @ 0.74 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 540M compare 96 @ 0.67 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 525M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 520MX compare 48 @ 0.9 GHz64 Bit @ 900 MHz
GeForce GT 520M compare 48 @ 0.74 GHz64 / 128 Bit @ 800 / 900 MHz
CodenameN12E-GE-B
ArchitectureFermi
Pipelines144 - unified
Core Speed525 - 753 (Boost) MHz
Shader Speed1180-1505 MHz
Memory Speed785-900 MHz
Memory Bus Width128, 192 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3,GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory3 GB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement06.01.2011

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1162     avg: 1322     median: 1299 (2%)     max: 1673 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1010     avg: 1179     median: 1146 (1%)     max: 1467 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 4752     avg: 5797     median: 5884 (2%)     max: 6462 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 4128     avg: 4847     median: 4997 (3%)     max: 5381 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 23096     avg: 26418     median: 26329 (14%)     max: 28937 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13882     avg: 18199     median: 18607 (20%)     max: 19357 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
min: 8857     avg: 11156     median: 11579 (15%)     max: 13033 points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 8836     avg: 10453     median: 10568 (14%)     max: 11525 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 1.86     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (1%)     max: 3.1 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 0.69     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (0%)     max: 0.92 fps
specvp11 sw-02 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 4.92     avg: 7.2     median: 6.8 (5%)     max: 10.19 fps
specvp11 proe-05 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (1%)     max: 1.1 fps
specvp11 maya-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 6.85     avg: 8.2     median: 7.6 (6%)     max: 10.53 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 8.74     avg: 10.2     median: 10 (11%)     max: 12.27 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 11.12     avg: 12     median: 11.8 (6%)     max: 13.52 fps
specvp11 catia-03 +
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 3.49     avg: 4.1     median: 4.2 (2%)     max: 4.61 fps
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 6.7     avg: 6.8     median: 6.9 (87%)     max: 6.9 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 5.3     avg: 6.5     median: 6.9 (87%)     max: 6.9 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4316     avg: 5321     median: 5436 (4%)     max: 5950 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 26.61     avg: 32.2     median: 33.4 (12%)     max: 35.21 fps
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
43.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
21.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
34.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
45.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.9  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
66.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
119.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
61.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
39.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
41.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
59  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
48  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Alan Wake

Alan Wake

2012
low 1024x768
36.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
10.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Star Wars: The Old Republic

Star Wars: The Old Republic

2011
low 1024x768
71.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
35.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
97.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
43 46 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34 37 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25 26 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
171.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
49.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.3  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
101  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
76  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
279.1 350.6 ~ 315 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
183.1 223.5 ~ 203 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
144.5 158.4 ~ 151 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2011

F1 2011

2011
low 800x600
med. 1024x768
high 1366x768
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
high 1366x768
ultra 1920x1080
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
109 109 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
75 77 79 ~ 77 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
48.3 50 51 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
12.7 13 13 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
71.9 81 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
47.3 47.4 55.4 ~ 50 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
34.7 35 40.8 41.6 ~ 38 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.7 12.3 12.9 13.3 ~ 13 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
72.7 81 111.7 ~ 88 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
64.7 66 83.5 ~ 71 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
54.7 56 67.6 69.8 ~ 62 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35.6 42.9 43.2 47 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
323.2 406 434.8 459.3 ~ 406 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
199.1 210.2 219 247.1 ~ 219 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
59 129 133.5 151.5 171 ~ 129 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
90.8 96 101.8 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
67 71.1 73 80.4 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
55 55 56 56.9 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
43.4 45 45 45.9 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.1 27 27.1 28 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
190 198.4 234.2 ~ 208 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
55.8 57 57.5 62.6 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1360x768
38 38.6 42.4 46.2 46.4 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
22.3 22.6 23.9 24 ~ 23 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
34 62.5 66.7 94.6 107.7 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1360x768
23 34.7 39.2 47.6 58.6 ~ 41 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1600x900
17.9 20.4 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
6.3 7.5 ~ 7 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
70.2 74 75.2 ~ 73 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
48 52.7 57.2 ~ 53 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
38.5 40 41 41.3 ~ 40 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.6 20 22.2 22.4 ~ 21 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 800x600
137.6 157.9 ~ 148 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
55.6 65.8 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45.2 54.1 ~ 50 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
29.7 34.6 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
79.8 92.9 100.7 109.9 112 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1024x768
37 45.3 48 48.2 52 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
24.5 28.9 33.5 34.4 38 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.9 22.7 ~ 22 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
93.3 144.9 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
56.8 67.3 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
58.8 65.1 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
37.2 44.1 45 80.3 91 ~ 60 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1366x768
30.1 34.7 49.2 55.3 59 ~ 46 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
30.2 33.2 ~ 32 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
82.8 92.7 102.5 125 126.3 ~ 106 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
69.6 77 89.1 90.5 102 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
40.8 41.4 51 54.5 58.1 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20 31.8 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
119.4 164 ~ 142 fps    + Compare
ultra 1280x1024
34.8 36.7 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
162 180.4 ~ 171 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
97.5 104.2 ~ 101 fps    + Compare
high 1280x1024
63.1 69.9 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
31.6 34.8 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
207.2 233.3 ~ 220 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
94 144.1 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
41.3 44.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
The Secret World43.834.121.18.1
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier34.816.27.8
Max Payne 345.341.912.69.9
Dirt Showdown66.661.437.112.9
Diablo III119.461.239.127.7
Risen 2: Dark Waters41.628.122.610.6
Mass Effect 3594827.2
Alan Wake36.224.610.6
Star Wars: The Old Republic71.835.221.1
Anno 207097.741.525.712.1
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim45362613.4
CoD: Modern Warfare 3171.377.146.527.1
Battlefield 349.232.324.59.8
Batman: Arkham City101763313
Fifa 1231520315196.8
F1 2011108855320
Deus Ex Human Revolution129.15119.8
Dirt 3109775013
Crysis 276503813
Call of Duty: Black Ops88716242
Fifa 1140621912996
Mafia 273564527
StarCraft 2208584223
Metro 20337341197
Battlefield: Bad Company 273534021
CoD Modern Warfare 2148615032
Risen99463222
Resident Evil 51196233.4
Need for Speed Shift62604632
Colin McRae: DIRT 2106864926
Anno 140414236
F.E.A.R. 21711016733
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare220119
Call of Juarez Benchmark43
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

8
16
9
3
11
12
2
7
18
3
2
24
6
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 11:59:00

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2055 +0.013s ... 0.062s

#7 got single benchmarks 2055 +0.059s ... 0.121s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.121s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.42s ... 0.541s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.541s

#11 Got 262 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.56s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.56s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.024s ... 0.584s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.999s ... 1.583s

#15 return log +0.038s ... 1.621s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M graphics card

 

Review Renice X5 mSATA SSD (60 GB)

Super small. The Renice X5 promises write speeds and read speeds of up to 160MB/s and 240MB/s, respectively, all in a package about half the size of a business ...
Intel Core i5-2410M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | 0.00"
 

Lenovo IdeaPad Y570-086225U Laptop Review

Multimedia Nexus. Desktop replacement notebooks are a dime a dozen, and Lenovo has tossed its hat into the ring with its introduction of the IdeaPad Y570, a str...
Intel Core i5-2410M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | 15.60" | 2.2 kg
 

Review Acer Aspire Ethos 5951G-2631675Wnkk Notebook

Multimedia center. With the Acer Aspire Ethos 5951G, Acer presents a multimedia machine with gaming qualities. Quad core processor, good graphics, 16 GB of RAM ...
Intel Core i7-2630QM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | 15.60" | 3.3 kg
 

Review Asus N55SF-S1124V Notebook

Beatbox. Asus and a matt screen? Not always but ever more often is the motto. Asus also shows what is within the realms of possibility with an external subwoofe...
Intel Core i7-2630QM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | 15.60" | 2.7 kg
 

Review Asus N75SF Notebook

Sound sensation. Average all-round laptops frequently suffer from poor picture and sound quality. Asus masterly breaks out of routined patterns and presents a f...
Intel Core i7-2630QM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M | 17.30" | 3.7 kg

Medion Erazer X6815: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review Medion Erazer X6815 Notebook

Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G-2631687Wnkk: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 18.40", 3.9 kg
  Review » Review Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G Notebook

Alienware M14x: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 14.10", 2.9 kg
  Review » Review Alienware M14x Notebook

SCHENKER XMG A501 (W150HRM): Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  Review » Review Schenker XMG A501 Notebook (Clevo W150HRM)

Dell XPS 17-L702X: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  Review » Review Dell XPS 17 Notebook (i7-2630QM & GT 555M)

MSI GE620DX-T-34: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI GE620DX-T-34

Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G-9630: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 18.40", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G-9630

Asus N55SF-S2276V: Intel Core i5-2430M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus N55SF-S2276V

Lenovo IdeaPad Y570-M62GZUK: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Y570-M62GZUK

LG A530: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » LG A530

Alienware M14x, i7-2670QM : Intel Core i7-2670QM, 14.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Alienware M14x, i7-2670QM

Asus N55SF-S302: Intel Core i5-2430M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N55SF-S302

Lenovo IdeaPad Y570-08626JU: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Y570-08626JU

Lenovo IdeaPad Y570-086268U: Intel Core i5-2430M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Y570-086268U

Ibuypower Battalion 101 W170HR: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Ibuypower Battalion 101 W170HR

Asus N55SF-S2086VSF: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N55SF-S2086VSF

Cyberpower Xplorer X7-7500: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 17.30", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Cyberpower Xplorer X7-7500

Asus N55SF-SX160: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N55SF-SX160

Medion Akoya P7812-MD98770: Intel Core i5-2430M, 17.30", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya P7812-MD98770

MSI GE620DX-i548W7H: Intel Core i5-2430M, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » MSI GE620DX-i548W7H

Asus N55SF-S1232V: Intel Core i7-2670QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N55SF-S1232V

Novatech Nspire 2760: Intel Core i7-2760QM, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Novatech Nspire 2760

Medion Akoya P7812-MD97938: Intel Core i5-2430M, 17.30", 3.5 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya P7812-MD97938

Asus N75SF-V2G-TZ106V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N75SF-V2G-TZ106V

Asus N45S: Intel Core i5-2410M, 14.00", 3 kg
  External Review » Asus N45S

Asus N55SF-1060V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N55SF-1060V

Medion Akoya P6812-MD98761: Intel Core i5-2430M, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya P6812-MD98761

Asus N75SF-V2G-TZ117V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N75SF-V2G-TZ117V

Medion Akoya P6812 MD98760: Intel Core i3-2330M, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya P6812 MD98760

Asus N55SF-A1: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Asus N55SF-A1

Asus N55SF-S1124V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N55SF-S1124V

Medion Erazer X6815-MD97862: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer X6815-MD97862

Acer Aspire Ethos 5951G-9694: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Ethos 5951G-9694

Asus N55S: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 14.00", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N55S

Asus N45SF: Intel Core i5-2410M, 14.00", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Asus N45SF

Asus N55SF-S1050V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N55SF-S1050V

Asus N75SF-V2G-TZ065V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N75SF-V2G-TZ065V

Lenovo IdeaPad Y570S-SSD: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Y570S-SSD

Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 18.40", 4.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G

Razer Blade: Intel Core i7-2640M, 17.30", 3.2 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade

Asus N55SF-S1093V: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus N55SF-S1093V

Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G-9600: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 18.40", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G-9600

Medion Erazer X6815: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer X6815

Acer Aspire Ethos 5951G-2631675Wnkk: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Ethos 5951G-2631675Wnkk

Acer Aspire Ethos 5951G-268G75BNkk: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 3.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Ethos 5951G-268G75BNkk

Medion Erazor X6816-MD97888: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.8 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazor X6816-MD97888

Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G-2631687Wnkk: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 18.40", 3.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G-2631687Wnkk

Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G-2634G1TBnkk: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 18.40", 4 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Ethos 8951G-2634G1TBnkk

Acer Aspire Ethos 5951: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 15.60", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire Ethos 5951

MSI GX780R-024CS: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.8 kg
  External Review » MSI GX780R-024CS

Lenovo IdeaPad Y570-086225U: Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Y570-086225U

Chiligreen Mobilitas OG: Intel Core i7-2620M, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Chiligreen Mobilitas OG

SCHENKER XMG A501 (W150HRM): Intel Core i5-2410M, 15.60", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Schenker XMG A501 (W150HRM)

Alienware M14x: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 14.10", 2.9 kg
  External Review » Alienware M14x

Dell XPS 17-L702X: Intel Core i7-2630QM, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 17-L702X

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter