Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon HD 6755G2

AMD Radeon HD 6755G2

The AMD Radeon HD 6755G2 is the combination of an integrated AMD Radeon HD 6620G or 6520G APU processor graphics card and a dedicated entry level AMD Radeon HD 6750M graphics card in CrossFire combination. This setup,  called AMD Dual Graphics or asymmetric CrossFire, uses AFR (Alternate Frame Rendering) to render alternating frames between the two graphics cores. As a result, the combination also suffers from the phenomenon known as micro stuttering.

The performance of the Radeon HD 6755G2 depends greatly on the driver support in games. In some games, the performance may even degrade by 10-15% compared to using only the APU graphics card. As of June 2011, only DirectX 10 and 11 graphics modes are supported and therefore lower settings and older games are not accelerated. Due to the micro stuttering and performance issues, AMD Dual Graphics may impose more problems than performance gains.

Supported Features like PureVideo HD (UVD3) and OpenCL have similar performance to a discrete Radeon HD 6750M.

As both graphics cards are rendering frames, the power consumption is clearly greater than if only one GPU was active.

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon HD 6000G2 Series
Radeon HD 6775G2 880
Radeon HD 6755G2 880
Radeon HD 6760G2 880
Radeon HD 6740G2 880
Radeon HD 6720G2 880
Radeon HD 6690G2 880
Radeon HD 6680G2 800
Radeon HD 6645G2 560
Radeon HD 6640G2 560
Radeon HD 6545G2 480
Radeon HD 6540G2 480
Radeon HD 6515G2 400
Radeon HD 6510G2 400
ArchitectureTerascale 2
Pipelines880 - unified
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement14.06.2011
* The specified clock rates are only guidelines for the manufacturer and can be altered by them.

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
0%
100%
min: 1528     avg: 1529 (3%)     median: 1529 (3%)     max: 1530 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
0%
100%
min: 1511     avg: 1513 (5%)     median: 1513 (5%)     max: 1515 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
P Result 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
0%
100%
min: 8810     avg: 8810 (19%)     median: 8810 (19%)     max: 8810 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
0%
100%
min: 12732     avg: 12732 (7%)     median: 12732 (7%)     max: 12732 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
0%
100%
min: 18.8     avg: 18.8 (8%)     median: 18.8 (8%)     max: 18.8 fps
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark Vantage - Gaming Score 1024x768
0%
100%
min: 4560     avg: 4560 (15%)     median: 4560 (15%)     max: 4560 Points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 +
Tcvis 1920x1080 +
SolidWorks 1920x1080 +
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 +
Maya 1920x1080 +
Lightwave 1920x1080 +
Ensight 1920x1080 +
Catia 1920x1080 +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
0%
100%
min: 6.4     avg: 6.4 (81%)     median: 6.4 (81%)     max: 6.4 points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
0%
100%
min: 6.4     avg: 6.4 (81%)     median: 6.4 (81%)     max: 6.4 points
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailled information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
67.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
124.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
67.9  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
47.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
51.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
35.2  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
31.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
46.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
31.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
24  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Call of Duty: Black Ops
med. 1024x768
29.1  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
25.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
45  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
37.6  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
30.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
StarCraft 2
low 1024x768
74.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
28.6  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
20.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Metro 2033
low 800x600
49.1 78.1 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
29.9 45.8 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
high 1600x900
19.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Battlefield: Bad Company 2
low 1024x768
63.6  fps    + Compare