Notebookcheck

NVIDIA GeForce 930M

NVIDIA GeForce 930M

The NVIDIA GeForce 930M (sometimes also called Nvidia GeForce GT 930M) is a (lower) mid-range, DirectX 11-compatible graphics card for laptops unveiled in March 2015. It is based on the last years GeForce 840M. In addition to the "normal" 25 Watt 930M, there is also a low power variant with a TDP of 12 Watt and support for DDR3 and GDDR5. The DDR3 variant should be approximately 10% slower than the 25 Watt version. The performance of the GDDR5 version is still unknown. The shader count for these low power 930M are also unknown. As the LP version is clocked only at 457 MHz + Boost it may feature more shaders (or a high Boost).

Update: The N16S-LP variant (5-12 Watt TDP, Low Power version?) will be available with GDDR5 starting in the first quarter of 2016. Later in 2016, the successor named GeForce 930MX was released that was available with GDDR5.

Architecture

Compared to Kepler, Maxwell has been optimized in several details to increase power efficiency. Smaller Streaming Multiprocessors (SMM) with only 128 ALUs (Kepler: 192) and an optimized scheduler should lead to better utilization of the shaders. Nvidia promises that a Maxwell SMM with 128 ALUs can offer 90 percent of the performance of a Kepler SMX with 192 ALUs. The 930M should feature the full GM108 with 3 SMMs (384 shader cores, 24 TMUs, and 8 ROPs due to the 64-bit interface). 

Another optimization is the massively enlarged L2 cache. The larger size can process some of the memory traffic to allow for a relatively narrow memory interface without significantly reducing performance.

Similar to GM107, the GM108 supports DirectX 12 with Feature Level 11_0 only.

Performance

The performance should be a bit below an average GeForce 840M due to the slower core clock. This means that demanding games like Evolve are only playable in lowest settings. Less demanding games like F1 2014 or Fifa 15 on the other hand should run in highest settings. See gaming benchmarks below for more details.

Features

GM108 integrates the sixth generation of the PureVideo HD video engine (VP6), offering a better decoding performance for H.264 and MPEG-2 videos. Of course, VP6 supports all features of previous generations (4K support, PIP, video encoding via NVENC API). Unfortunately, HDMI 2.0 is still not supported.

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the GeForce 930M should be about 33 Watts or less. Therefore, the 930M is best suited for laptops 13 inches in size or larger. The 900M series also supports Optimus to automatically switch between an integrated graphics card and the Nvidia GPU.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GeForce 900M Series
GeForce 945M compare 512 @ 0.93 - 1.05 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5) compare 384 @ 0.95 - 0.99 GHz64 Bit @ 5012 MHz
GeForce 940MX compare 384 @ 1.12 - 1.24 GHz64 Bit @ 4000 MHz
GeForce 940M compare 384 @ 1.07 - 1.18 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
GeForce 930MX compare 384 @ 0.95 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
GeForce 930M 384 @ 0.93 - 0.94 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 920MX compare 256 @ 0.97 - 0.99 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 920M compare 384 @ 0.95 GHz64 Bit @ 1800 MHz
GeForce 910M compare 384 @ 0.64 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
CodenameN16S-GM-B/S, N16S-LP
ArchitectureMaxwell
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed928 - 941 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed1800 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
technology28 nm
FeaturesGPU Boost 2.0, Optimus, PhysX, CUDA, GeForce Experience, GameWorks
Date of Announcement12.03.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.geforce.com/hardware/notebook...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
6.3 pt (7%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 +
specvp11 tcvis-02 +
specvp11 sw-02 +
specvp11 proe-05 +
specvp11 maya-03 +
specvp11 lightwave-01 +
specvp11 ensight-04 +
specvp11 catia-03 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

World of Tanks enCore

World of Tanks enCore

2018
low 1366x768
203.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
94.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1366x768
78.3
low 1280x720
24.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset (100 % Resolution Scale) 1366x768
10.5
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
39  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF 1366x768
26
low 1280x720
34.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 1366x768
21.6
low 1280x720
76.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
70  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
51.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF FXAA 1366x768
34.3
low 1280x720
37  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / On (100 % Gameplay Resolution) MediumAA 1366x768
20.7
low 1280x720
27.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset (Resolution Scale Mode off) FXAA 1366x768
19.1
low 1280x720
24  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset FXAA 1366x768
14.3
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
39.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF TAA 1366x768
22.8
low 1280x720
54  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off FXAA 1366x768
22.6
low 1280x720
121.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
31.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
low 1280x720
103  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
75  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
68.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
48.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
3.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
25  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
34.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
46.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
21.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
32.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
46.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
40.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
99.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
57.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
36.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1366x768
102.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
75.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
34.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
40.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
34.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13 26 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11 21 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5 10 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5 5 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26 (!) 27 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
137.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.2 53.5 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.4 27.5 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
57.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
50.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
56.2 61.3 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39.7 46.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.9 16.9 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Evolve

Evolve

2015
low 1024x768
32.2 33.4 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.3 23.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Crew

The Crew

2014
low 1280x720
34.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
43.5 (!) 46.5 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.4 35.3 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4

2014
low 1024x768
38.6 41.8 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.7 29.2 ~ 28 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
50.1 64.6 ~ 57 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30.1 30.6 ~ 30 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
57.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.2 76 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.5  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
90 (!)  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
66 (!) 81 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45 59 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30 34 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
40.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
45.7 63.5 66.7 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.8 41.8 42.4 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.9 21.2 21.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
37 39.3 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
23.8 24.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fifa 15

Fifa 15

2014
high 1366x768
66.6 66.9 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.8 47 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
184.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
90.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
40.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
33.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
48.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
98.4 187.2 ~ 143 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.3 75.8 80.4 ~ 72 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
27.6 36.6 36.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15 16.6 17.2 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
40.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
40.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1280x720
33.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
35.2 39.9 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.6 25.9 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.3 19.8 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
53.3 62 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
38.2 40.7 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.1 27.1 ~ 27 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Dota 2

Dota 2

2013
med. 1366x768
59.3 63.1 ~ 61 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
26.3 32.1 ~ 29 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
40.8 45.8 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.7 35.5 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
20.1 21.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
73.4 79.2 83.2 92.3 ~ 82 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
45.4 47 47.7 49.6 50.6 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
36.5 38.4 38.8 40 41 ~ 39 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.6 13.2 13.4 13.6 13.7 ~ 13 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
118.2 121.4 122 123.2 128 ~ 123 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58 58.4 58.7 60 60.9 61.6 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
31.9 32.5 33 33.2 33.4 33.5 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.6 15.6 15.7 16 16.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
36.4 37.7 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.7 22 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
138.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
93.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
73.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
med. 1366x768
63  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
37.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce 930M graphics card

Asus Asuspro Essential P751JF-T2007G: Intel Core i5-4210M, 17.30", 3 kg
  Review » Asus AsusPro Essential P751JF Notebook Review

HP Envy 15-w000ng x360: Intel Core i5-5200U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » HP Envy 15-w000ng x360 Notebook Review

HP Envy 15-w103ng x360: Intel Core i5-6200U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  Review » HP Envy 15 x360 Convertible (Core i5-6200U) Review

Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT: Intel Core i5-6200U, 17.30", 3.6 kg
  Review » Toshiba Satellite C70-C-1FT Notebook Review

Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275: Intel Core i5-6200U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  Review » Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275 Notebook Review

Toshiba Satellite P50-C-10G: Intel Core i7-5500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  Review » Toshiba Satellite P50-C-10G Notebook Review

Asus A555LF: Intel Core i5-5200U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus A555LF

Asus K555LF-XO017D: Intel Core i7-5500U, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus K555LF-XO017D

Dell Vostro 5459: Intel Core i5-6200U, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 5459

Medion Akoya P7641-MD99855: Intel Core i5-6200U, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Medion Akoya P7641-MD99855

Toshiba Satellite L50-C-111: Intel Core i5-5200U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L50-C-111

Toshiba Satellite L50-C-15C: Intel Core i7-5500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L50-C-15C

Toshiba Satellite L50-C-18U: Intel Core i5-5200U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L50-C-18U

Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275: Intel Core i5-6200U, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite L50-C-275

Toshiba Satellite P50-C-10e: Intel Core i7-5500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50-C-10e

Toshiba Satellite P50-C-10G: Intel Core i7-5500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50-C-10G

Toshiba Satellite P50-C-129: Intel Core i7-5500U, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50-C-129

Toshiba Satellite P50-C186: Intel Core i7-6500U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite P50-C186

Toshiba Satellite Pro A50-C-1MT: Intel Core i5-6200U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Satellite Pro A50-C-1MT

Toshiba Tecra Z40-C-103: Intel Core i7-6600U, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Tecra Z40-C-103

Toshiba Tecra Z50-C1550: Intel Core i7-6600U, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Tecra Z50-C1550

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

newitem

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Comparison of Laptop Graphics Cards > NVIDIA GeForce 930M
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2016-01-26)