Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 

AMD Radeon R7 M360

AMD Radeon R7 M360

The AMD Radeon R7 M360 is a dedicated lower-mid-range graphics card for laptops that was announced in mid 2015. It is based on a new derivative of the Tonga chip and therefore supports DirectX 12, Vulkan and FreeSync. The core is clocked at relatively high 1015 MHz, however, the bottleneck may be the use of slow 64-bit DDR3 graphics memory.

Performance

The performance of the R7-M360 is slightly above the slower clocked Radeon R7 M260 (64-bit model) and silimar to a GeForce 920M. Therefore, very demanding modern games like Dragon Age: Inquisition or Evolve are only playable at the lowest graphics settings.

The 384 shaders can be used with OpenCL 1.2 for general-purpose calculations (as 10 compute units).

Features

Features of the R7-M360 include video decoding for MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, and Flash directly by the AMD GPU. Multi-View Codec (MVC) and MPEG-4 part 2 (DivX, xVid) HD videos are compatible as well.

The R7 series also supports automatic graphics switching between the integrated GPU and discrete GPU. Called Enduro, the technology supersedes AMD's Dynamic Switchable Graphics and is similar to Nvidia's Optimus. Furthermore, the M375 can directly support multiple monitors using the Eyefinity Technology if Enduro is disabled.

Other features include ZeroCore for a reduced power consumption when the display is turned off and Power Gating to power down areas of the chip that are not used. 

The integrated HD audio processor is able to transmit HD Audio (TrueHD or DTS Master Audio) over HDMI and DisplayPort (e.g., for Blu-Ray videos). Additionally, it allows audio output simultaneously and in parallel to multiple devices with the new Discrete Digital Multipoint Audio (DDMA) feature.

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon R7 M300 Series
Radeon R7 M380 compare 640 @ 0.92 GHz128 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Radeon R7 M370 compare 384 @ 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 3600 MHz
Radeon R7 M360 384 @ 1.13 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
Radeon R7 M340 compare 320 @ 1.02 GHz64 Bit @ 2000 MHz
ArchitectureGCN 2.0
Pipelines384 - unified
Core Speed1125 MHz
Memory Speed2000 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB
Shared Memoryno
DirectXDirectX 12
technology28 nm
FeaturesDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL 4.3, OpenCL 1.2, Vulkan
Date of Announcement06.05.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphi...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5.6 pt (6%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180 -76%
...
NVIDIA GeForce 920M -4%
NVIDIA Quadro M520 -3%
AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) -3%
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics -3%
AMD Radeon 520 -2%
AMD Radeon R6 M255DX -1%
NVIDIA GeForce 710M -1%
AMD Radeon R7 M445 0%
AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo) 0%
AMD Radeon R7 M360
NVIDIA GeForce 830M 0%
AMD Radeon HD 8850M 1%
AMD Radeon HD 8750M 1%
Intel HD Graphics 530 2%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics 2%
AMD Radeon HD 8550G 2%
Intel HD Graphics 6000 4%
NVIDIA GeForce 820M 4%
Intel HD Graphics 620 5%
...
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 1575%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
463 Points (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
410 Points (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 72946     avg: 82837     median: 82837 (13%)     max: 92728 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 41105     avg: 42271     median: 42270.5 (6%)     max: 43436 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 4097     avg: 4596     median: 4583 (6%)     max: 5001 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 5117     avg: 5607     median: 5746 (3%)     max: 5983 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1003     avg: 1020     median: 1024 (3%)     max: 1031 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 1109     avg: 1140     median: 1146 (2%)     max: 1163 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 29601     avg: 45169     median: 52264 (7%)     max: 60310 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1720     avg: 2088     median: 2156 (5%)     max: 2301 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1721     avg: 2014     median: 2029 (3%)     max: 2222 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
5544 Points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
5162 Points (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 8179     avg: 8275     median: 8273.5 (15%)     max: 8374 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
15.4 fps (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
12.4 fps (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4908     avg: 6506     median: 7326 (35%)     max: 7952 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 23.51     avg: 24.7     median: 24.9 (11%)     max: 25.4 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 31.26     avg: 33.9     median: 34.3 (10%)     max: 35.64 fps
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
111 fps (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
59.7 fps (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
30.2 fps (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
29.2 fps (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
173 Samples/s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
313 Samples/s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1523 points (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dishonored 2

Dishonored 2

2016
low 1280x720
10.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Titanfall 2

Titanfall 2

2016
low 1280x720
41.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Farming Simulator 17

Farming Simulator 17

2016
low 1280x720
71.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
58.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
14.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 17

FIFA 17

2016
low 1280x720
90.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
71.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Deus Ex Mankind Divided

Deus Ex Mankind Divided

2016
low 1280x720
13.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
No Man's Sky

No Man's Sky

2016
low 1280x720
18.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Mirror's Edge Catalyst

Mirror's Edge Catalyst

2016
low 1280x720
25.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
21.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Ashes of the Singularity

Ashes of the Singularity

2016
low 1280x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Need for Speed 2016

Need for Speed 2016

2016
low 1280x720
28.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hitman 2016

Hitman 2016

2016
low 1280x720
14.1 19.2 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11 17.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Division

The Division

2016
low 1280x720
14.5 29.6 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
0 (!) 17.1 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
0 (!) 7.1 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
5.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry Primal

Far Cry Primal

2016
low 1280x720
18 22 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7 8 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
18.3 21.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.3 7.5 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5 5.1 ~ 5 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

2016
low 1024x768
19.6 25.5 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.3 12.3 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.9 7.3 ~ 7 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Rainbow Six Siege

Rainbow Six Siege

2015
low 1024x768
46.8 49.4 ~ 48 fps    + Compare