Notebookcheck

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

The AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) is an integrated graphics adapter of the weaker mobile dual-core Stoney Ridge APUs. At its launch, it is being used in the AMD A9-9410 and has 3 active Compute Cores (384 shaders). Depending on the model, the maximum clock is 800 MHz. The performance can vary heavily depending on the configured TDP and the system memory. Compared to the Radeon R5 from the Bristol Ridge series, it only has 3 instead of 6 GCN cores (and is the full configuration of the Stoney Ridge chip).

Architecture and Features

The Radeon R5 is equipped with three cores from the third GCN generation (often called GCN 1.2 or 2.0 by the press). This means it is very similar to the Tonga desktop chip and supports DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), but the graphics cores can also be accessed via Mantle, OpenGL, and OpenCL. The GPU supports the HSA 1.0 standard as well and can therefore use the connection with the CPU cores very efficiently. The technical specifications are identical to the Carrizo predecessor. 

The video unit includes the UVD 6 (Unified Video Decoder), which can decode HEVC/H.265 and 4K with support from the hardware. More details are available in our dedicated Stoney Ridge article

Power Consumption

Depending on the model and configured TDP (cTDP), the 28 nm chip is specified with 10 up to 25 Watts. This means it can also be used for thin and light notebooks.

ManufacturerAMD
Radeon R (Stoney / Bristol Ridge) Series
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) (compare) 512 @ 900 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) (compare) 384 @ 800 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) 192 @ 800 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) (compare) 192 @ 600 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) (compare) 128 @ 600 (Boost) MHz64 Bit
CodenameStoney Ridge
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_0)
technology28 nm
FeaturesUVD 6, VCE
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.06.2016
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD A9-94252 x 3100 MHz, 10-25 W? MHz800 MHz
AMD A9-9420e2 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
AMD A9-94202 x 3000 MHz, 10-25 W? MHz800 MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? - ? MHz720 - 800 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
5.4 pt (6%)
3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 46978     avg: 50907     median: 51382 (244%)     max: 54361 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 32172     avg: 33057.5     median: 33057.5 (363%)     max: 33943 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 2673     avg: 2892.7     median: 2995 (1683%)     max: 3010 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 3661     avg: 4439.3     median: 4755 (3279%)     max: 4902 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 49964     avg: 51392     median: 51392 (381%)     max: 52820 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
...
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
...
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 +
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 +
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - DX 11, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - OpenGL, Normal Tessellation, High Shaders 1920x1080
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit +
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit +
Ref. Match 64Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 +
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
21.8 fps (115%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
32.6 fps (163%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
15.6 fps (248%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
27.7 fps (351%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
30.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
15.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
39  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
7.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
28  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
32.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
41.4 47.8 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.9 25.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
21.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
19.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF TAA 1366x768
11.9
low 1280x720
28.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off FXAA 1366x768
17.1
low 1280x720
53.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
29.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
30.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x768
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
14 16.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8 10.4 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
37.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
34.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
33.1 35.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.2 23.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
fps  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
59.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
19.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
39  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
16 22.3 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
11 13.8 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
111.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
20.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
65.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
31.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
44  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
52.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
38 43.4 43.5 47.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
0 (!) 22 26.9 28 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
0 (!) 18 22.2 23 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 7.5 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
51.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
63.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
39.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
59.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
32.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
62.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
81.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
24.3  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
18.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.11

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) graphics card

Asus VivoBook X751BP-TY048T: AMD A9-9420, 17.3", 2.6 kg
  Review » Asus VivoBook X751BP (AMD A9-9420, HD+) Laptop Review

HP 15-bw077ax: AMD A9-9420, 15.6", 1.9 kg
  Review » HP 15-BW077AX (A9-9420, Radeon R5) Notebook Review

Lenovo V145-15AST: AMD A9-9425, 15.6", 2.1 kg
  Review » Lenovo V145-15AST (A9-9425, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST: AMD A9-9410, 14", 1.8 kg
  Review » Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST (A9-9410, HD) Convertible Review

Dell Inspiron 11 3195 2-in-1: AMD A9-9420e, 11.6", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 11 3195 2-in-1

Dell Inspiron 15 3565-7923: AMD A9-9410, 15.6", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 3565-7923

HP 14-cm0002ns: AMD A9-9425, 14", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14-cm0002ns

HP 14-dk0013ns: AMD A9-9425, 14", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14-dk0013ns

HP 15-ba110ur: AMD A9-9410, 15.6", 2 kg
  External Review » HP 15-ba110ur

HP 15-bw077ax: AMD A9-9420, 15.6", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP 15-bw077ax

HP 15-DB0109N: AMD A9-9425, 15.6", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15-DB0109N

HP Envy x360 15-ar002na: AMD A9-9410, 15.6", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15-ar002na

Lenovo 14w (no touch): AMD A6-9220C, 14", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo 14w (no touch)

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V2SP: AMD A9-9420, 15.6", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V2SP

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V3SP: AMD A9-9420, 15.6", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V3SP

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V4SP: AMD A9-9420, 15.6", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V4SP

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV0100SP: AMD A9-9420, 15.6", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV0100SP

Lenovo Ideapad S145-14AST-81ST002BMH: AMD A9-9425, 14", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S145-14AST-81ST002BMH

Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST: AMD A9-9410, 14", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST