Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

The AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) is an integrated graphics adapter of the weaker mobile dual-core Stoney Ridge APUs. At its launch, it is being used in the AMD A9-9410 and has 3 active Compute Cores (384 shaders). Depending on the model, the maximum clock is 800 MHz. The performance can vary heavily depending on the configured TDP and the system memory. Compared to the Radeon R5 from the Bristol Ridge series, it only has 3 instead of 6 GCN cores (and is the full configuration of the Stoney Ridge chip).

Architecture and Features

The Radeon R5 is equipped with three cores from the third GCN generation (often called GCN 1.2 or 2.0 by the press). This means it is very similar to the Tonga desktop chip and supports DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), but the graphics cores can also be accessed via Mantle, OpenGL, and OpenCL. The GPU supports the HSA 1.0 standard as well and can therefore use the connection with the CPU cores very efficiently. The technical specifications are identical to the Carrizo predecessor. 

The video unit includes the UVD 6 (Unified Video Decoder), which can decode HEVC/H.265 and 4K with support from the hardware. More details are available in our dedicated Stoney Ridge article

Power Consumption

Depending on the model and configured TDP (cTDP), the 28 nm chip is specified with 10 up to 25 Watts. This means it can also be used for thin and light notebooks.

Radeon R (Stoney / Bristol Ridge) Series

Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) compare 512 @ 0.9 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) compare 384 @ 0.8 GHz64/128 Bit
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) 192 @ 0.8 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) compare 192 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) compare 128 @ 0.6 GHz64 Bit
CodenameStoney Ridge
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12 (FL 12_0), OpenGL 4.4
Power Consumption12-45 Watt
technology28 nm
FeaturesUVD 6, VCE
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.06.2016
CPU in Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD A9-94252 x 3100 MHz, 15 W? MHz900 MHz
AMD A9-9420e2 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
AMD A9-94202 x 3000 MHz, 10-25 W? MHz800 MHz
min. - max.? MHz720 - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
0.4 pt (1%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
30.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
7.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2018

F1 2018

2018
low 1280x720
12  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
13.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
7.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
4.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Destiny 2

Destiny 2

2017
low 1280x720
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 18

FIFA 18

2017
low 1280x720
42.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
15  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
35.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
32.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
41.4 47.8 ~ 45 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.9 25.6 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
21.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
10.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
19.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium Preset 4xAF TAA 1366x768
11.9
low 1280x720
28.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium / Off FXAA 1366x768
17.1
low 1280x720
53.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
36.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
29.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
30.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x768
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
11.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
14 16.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
8 10.4 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
26.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
21.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1366x768
37.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
34.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
24.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
33.1 35.2 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
19.2 23.2 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
59.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
19.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
12  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
39  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
30  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
16 22.3 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
11 13.8 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
111.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
20.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
65.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
31.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
9.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
44  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
52.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
13  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
38 43.4 43.5 47.3 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
0 (!) 22 26.9 28 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
0 (!) 18 22.2 23 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
0 (!) 7.5 ~ 4 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
51.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
18.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
63.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
31  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
26.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
39.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
28.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
59.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
41.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
32.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.2  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
15.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
35  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
13  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
62.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
29  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
26  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
21  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
17  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
81.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1360x768
24.3  fps    + Compare
high 1360x768
18.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
82.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
43.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dirt Rally 2.030.99.9
Far Cry New Dawn62
Metro Exodus8.44.3
Apex Legends15.47
Just Cause 412.37
Darksiders III22.511.8
Farming Simulator 193914
Hitman 27.43.5
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey104
Forza Horizon 4135
Shadow of the Tomb Raider134
F1 20181212
Monster Hunter World41
Far Cry 541
X-Plane 11.1113.79.4
Kingdom Come: Deliverance7.53
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark8.14.3
Fortnite287
Destiny 210
ELEX6
The Evil Within 26
Middle-earth: Shadow of War8
FIFA 1842.619.4
Ark Survival Evolved156.2
F1 2017181310
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)12.1
Team Fortress 235.232.8
Dirt 432.8
Rocket League452316.3
Prey21.5
Mass Effect Andromeda12.2
Ghost Recon Wildlands10.95.2
For Honor19.97.3
Resident Evil 728.613.2
Farming Simulator 1753.436.1
Civilization VI29.412.1
Overwatch30.424.6
Ashes of the Singularity7
Hitman 201642
The Division18.211.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider159
Rainbow Six Siege26.921.6
World of Warships37.728.8
Metal Gear Solid V34.124.9
Dota 2 Reborn3421
Batman: Arkham Knight85
The Witcher 39
Dirt Rally59.722
Dragon Age: Inquisition19.314.8
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare12
F1 20143930
Alien: Isolation2717
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor1912
Sims 4111.934.3
Risen 3: Titan Lords20.912.9
GRID: Autosport65.129.7
X-Plane 10.2531.717.79.6
Batman: Arkham Origins442614
Company of Heroes 213105
GRID 252.931.82612.5
Metro: Last Light13106
BioShock Infinite4319164
Tomb Raider51.925.718.2
Dead Space 363.93126.6
Counter-Strike: GO39.228.525
Diablo III59.641.833.6
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim32.722.215.4
Batman: Arkham City352713
Deus Ex Human Revolution62.429
Mafia 2262117
StarCraft 281.424.318.612.4
World of Warcraft82.643.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
44
22
6
52
8

16
1

3








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 16:50:22

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Mar 2024 05:38:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.037s ... 0.039s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.039s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.039s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 7447 +0.029s ... 0.068s

#7 got single benchmarks 7447 +0.023s ... 0.091s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.091s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.529s ... 0.62s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.62s

#11 Got 170 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.632s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.632s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.045s ... 0.677s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +1.277s ... 1.954s

#15 return log +0.039s ... 1.993s

Notebook reviews with AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) graphics card

Lenovo V145-15AST (A9-9425, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

Lenovo V145-15AST (A9-9425, SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

Lenovo's 15.6-inch laptop has a Stoney Ridge APU, an SSD and 8 GB of RAM on board. About 430 Euros (~$485) has to be spent on the computer. The screen and the b...
AMD A9-9425 | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | 15.60" | 2.1 kg
Asus VivoBook X751BP (AMD A9-9420, HD+) Laptop Review

Asus VivoBook X751BP (AMD A9-9420, HD+) Laptop Review

Room for improvement! The Asus VivoBook X751BP is an affordable entry-level office notebook with subpar performance. Our review will reveal whether or not it mi...
AMD A9-9420 | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | 17.30" | 2.6 kg
HP 15-BW077AX (A9-9420, Radeon R5) Notebook Review

HP 15-BW077AX (A9-9420, Radeon R5) Notebook Review

Slow and Steady. The HP 15-BW077AX is an entry-level laptop from HP with AMD's newest A9 APU. Despite its young age, the CPU feels years behind the competition ...
AMD A9-9420 | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | 15.60" | 1.9 kg
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST (A9-9410, HD) Convertible Review

Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST (A9-9410, HD) Convertible Review

Disappointing screen. Lenovo's 14-inch convertible carries a price tag of around 500 Euros (~$533). The buyer gets a Stoney Ridge APU with a solid-state drive, ...
AMD A9-9410 | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | 14.00" | 1.8 kg

Lenovo Chromebook 3 11, A6-9220C: AMD A6-9220C, 11.60", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Chromebook 3 11, A6-9220C

HP 14-BW017AU : AMD A9-9420, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP 14-BW017AU

Asus K543BA-GQ749: AMD A9-9425, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus K543BA-GQ749

HP 14-dk0013ns: AMD A9-9425, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14-dk0013ns

Lenovo Ideapad S145-14AST-81ST002BMH: AMD A9-9425, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad S145-14AST-81ST002BMH

HP 15-DB0109N: AMD A9-9425, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » HP 15-DB0109N

Dell Inspiron 11 3195 2-in-1: AMD A9-9420e, 11.60", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 11 3195 2-in-1

HP 14-cm0002ns: AMD A9-9425, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » HP 14-cm0002ns

Lenovo 14w (no touch): AMD A6-9220C, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo 14w (no touch)

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V2SP: AMD A9-9420, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V2SP

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V4SP: AMD A9-9420, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V4SP

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV0100SP: AMD A9-9420, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV0100SP

Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V3SP: AMD A9-9420, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Ideapad 320-15AST-80XV00V3SP

Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST: AMD A9-9410, 14.00", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST

HP 15-bw077ax: AMD A9-9420, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP 15-bw077ax

Dell Inspiron 15 3565-7923: AMD A9-9410, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 3565-7923

HP 15-ba110ur: AMD A9-9410, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP 15-ba110ur

HP Envy x360 15-ar002na: AMD A9-9410, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15-ar002na

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 0

Arc A380

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter