Battlefield 1 Notebook and Desktop Benchmarks

Great visuals. Battlefield once again shows how nice a video game can look nowadays. We will find out what that means for the system requirements for notebooks as well as desktop systems.

Florian Glaser, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Andreas Osthoff), Published 10/31/2016 🇩🇪 🇹🇷 ...

For the original German article, see here.

Graphics

That the new title from the extremely popular shooter-series will be a success was already a sure thing after the Beta version. The final product can almost meet the high expectations completely, both in terms of gameplay as well as graphics.

Developer DICE further optimized the Frostbite 3 Engine, which is used for numerous games from EA (like FIFA 17, Mirror's Edge Catalyst, Need for Speed 2016 & Dragon Age Inquisition). Together with the CryEngine 4, id Tech 6, and Unreal Engine 3, it is among the best graphics engines on the market right now. Even the great-looking Star Wars Battlefront from last year is beaten in terms of visual quality.

One of the biggest advantages of the Frostbite 3 engine is the enormous amount of details. You will not find similarly crisp textures in many titles, and the same applies for the level design. There are a lot of decoration objects like stones and bushes all the way up to debris on the extremely good-looking and diverse battlefields from World War I. The result is a great atmosphere supported by first-class effects. It does not matter if you have smoke, rain or mud: Battlefield 1 is always up to date and can even set new benchmarks.

Other highlights are the lush drawing distance and the physics simulation. Contrary to the majority of action titles, trees, fences and walls are not insurmountable obstacles. Houses can be destroyed as well, which does create some tactical possibilities. The spectacle is accompanied by a brilliant sound. Besides the music tracks, the effects (shooting sound, explosions, etc.) are impeccable.

The single-player mode will probably create diverge opinions. The idea with the War Stories is quite interesting and promising, especially since every mission is introduced by creative videos, but the final result still feels pretty "casual". In the end – as per usual for this genre – you basically shoot your way through pretty dumb hordes of enemies, and the staging of Battlefield 1 usually falls a bit short of Call of Duty. However, the missions are a perfect preparation for the multiplayer. Players not only get used to the rudimentary sneaking system, but they also learn to control vehicles and planes.

We were not completely disappointed by the campaign. The great visual and sound quality can compensate for several gameplay and story drawbacks pretty well. Contrary to Call of Duty, we also like the slightly darker setting, which takes the war scenario a bit more seriously than some rivals and tries to avoid the glorification of violence or its minimization, respectively (you can decide whether this is a success). Subjectively, however, Battlefield 1 is not as much of a shooting gallery.

You can hardly criticize the developers from a technological point of view. The Video menu, which is also accessible when you are playing, offers a lot of settings for experienced users. DICE divided the options into two tabs to make it easier. It starts with the Basic menu, where you can adjust the picture mode, resolution, brightness, V-Sync, drawing distance, Motion Blur and the Blur effects. Color-blind users get settings here as well.

Most settings are available in the Advanced menu, which also takes care of the DirectX mode (more on that later), the size of the HUD and the general graphics quality. If you do not like to tinker around, there are also four presets (Low, Medium, High & Ultra). Available anti-aliasing modes are FXAA and TAA. While the former does not fully eliminate aliasing and does create a certain blurriness, the latter works very well. Great: Changes are usually applied without a restart.

Although the visual quality of Battlefield 1 suffers significantly at the lowest settings and there will be pop-ups as well as flickering objects, the game is not ugly by any means. We would call the visual quality good with the Medium preset, and very good with the High preset. There are no noteworthy differences in terms of quality or performance between High and Ultra settings. The frame rate is always capped at 200 frames per second by the way, independent of the V-Sync setting.

But back to the graphics menu: The point GPU Memory Restriction, which has a look at the VRAM load and automatically reduces details if necessary, was deactivated for our benchmarks. Resolution Scale on the other hand, which allows down- or up-sampling, respectively, was at 100%.

We did not have any problems with crashes, bugs or severe graphics errors during the tests, but we did notice some minor issues during the benchmarks:

Battlefield 1 often launched in a window instead of full-screen mode at the first start
the loading times are not very short even with SSDs
returning to the desktop often takes quite some time when you exit the game
there can be stutters during the videos on some systems

All things considered, the engine leaves a very clean and sophisticated impression. Some other games from 2015 and 2016 can only dream of this (like Mafia 3, Hitman, Just Cause 3 & Batman Arkham Knight).

Benchmark

In order to get steady numbers, we use a sequence from the single-player mode for our benchmarks. The player drives a British Mark V tank through France, which is shocked by trench warfare, in the first part of the campaign mission "Through Mud and Blood".

Thanks to the identical run and the representative performance, the beginning is perfect for performance evaluations. The tank follows the path automatically for the first 30 seconds until it stops at a provisional wood bridge. Your system should be capable of at least 40 frames per second since this is a first-person action title.

Results

Despite the modern engine, the hardware requirements are pretty moderate. You will be well prepared for World War I unless your system only uses a weak low-end chip like the GeForce GT 720M or an HD Graphics model from the Intel processors. A mainstream GPU like the GeForce 940M has no problems with Very Low details and 1280x720 pixels.

1920x1080 pixels and the Medium preset runs smoothly with at least a GeForce GTX 860M or GTX 950M, while High settings require a GeForce GTX 870M. We recommend a GeForce GTX 880M, GTX 965M or better for a combination of FHD and the preset Ultra. Users of 4K monitors can enjoy Battlefield 1 with a high-end GPU like the GeForce GTX 980 or GTX 1060, respectively. Switching to Ultra details does not really affect the performance; our GTX 1080 desktop GPU only drops from 71 to 67 FPS. Similar to the majority of titles, the CPU is not very important and the frame rate in our tests was limited by the GPU most of the time.

Battlefield 1
3840x2160 High Preset AA:T 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:FX 1366x768 Medium Preset AA:FX 1280x720 Low Preset
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition	70.6 (64^min) fps ∼57% 147 (132^min) fps ∼73% 162 (152^min) fps ∼81% 193 (179^min) fps ∼96% 200 (197^min) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 1070 OC Bios Desktop PC	57.1 (49^min) fps ∼46% 122 (106^min) fps ∼61% 139 (129^min) fps ∼69% 195 (184^min) fps ∼97% 200 (197^min) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 4790K Asus Strix GTX 980 Ti Desktop PC	55.1 (51^min) fps ∼45% 115 (104^min) fps ∼57%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK Asus G752VS	50.9 (43^min) fps ∼41% 118 (102^min) fps ∼59% 128 (115^min) fps ∼64% 162 (140^min) fps ∼81% 167 (157^min) fps ∼83% 186 (177^min) fps ∼93%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury, 4790K XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro	46.6 (41^min) fps ∼38% 102 (79^min) fps ∼51%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, 6700K Desktop PC	39.2 (33^min) fps ∼32% 96.9 (86^min) fps ∼48% 105 (95^min) fps ∼52% 145 (137^min) fps ∼72% 194 (180^min) fps ∼97% 199 (192^min) fps ∼99%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K Desktop PC	39.2 (34^min) fps ∼32% 94.6 (82^min) fps ∼47% 104 (95^min) fps ∼52% 143 (134^min) fps ∼71% 196 (183^min) fps ∼98% 199 (196^min) fps ∼99%
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference	38.1 (33^min) fps ∼31% 89.4 (76^min) fps ∼44% 88.5 (72^min) fps ∼44% 99 (86^min) fps ∼49%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970, 4790K MSI Gaming Z GeForce GTX 970 Desktop PC	37.5 (33^min) fps ∼30% 87 (78^min) fps ∼43%
AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop), 4790K MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB	35.2 (29^min) fps ∼29% 83 (73^min) fps ∼41% 92 (83^min) fps ∼46%
AMD Radeon R9 290X, 4790K Sapphire Radeon R9 290X Tri-X OC	96 (85^min) fps ∼48% 39.7 (35^min) fps ∼20%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	29.1 (24^min) fps ∼24% 69.8 (59^min) fps ∼35% 77.4 (69^min) fps ∼39% 102 (92^min) fps ∼51% 124 (112^min) fps ∼62% 138 (116^min) fps ∼69%
AMD Radeon R9 280X, 4790K Asus Z97 Deluxe Desktop i7-4790K, R9 280X	17 (3^min) fps ∼14% 60.2 (52^min) fps ∼30% 66.7 (60^min) fps ∼33%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	22.7 (19^min) fps ∼18% 55.4 (47^min) fps ∼28% 58.3 (53^min) fps ∼29% 84.8 (77^min) fps ∼42% 122 (115^min) fps ∼61% 142 (121^min) fps ∼71%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ MSI GE72 965M Ti	17 (14^min) fps ∼14% 42.5 (36^min) fps ∼21% 51.4 (46^min) fps ∼26% 67.3 (61^min) fps ∼33% 104 (96^min) fps ∼52% 130 (116^min) fps ∼65%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	15 (12^min) fps ∼12% 44 (38^min) fps ∼22% 45.5 (41^min) fps ∼23% 65 (57^min) fps ∼32% 93.8 (87^min) fps ∼47% 140 (131^min) fps ∼70%
AMD Radeon R7 370, 4790K MSI Gaming R7 370 2GB	3.3 (2^min) fps ∼3% 40.1 (34^min) fps ∼20% 42.6 (36^min) fps ∼21% 82 (76^min) fps ∼41%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB	18.8 (16^min) fps ∼15% 46.6 (38^min) fps ∼23% 51 (44^min) fps ∼25% 107 (93^min) fps ∼53% 161 (141^min) fps ∼80%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	14.4 (11^min) fps ∼12% 37 (30^min) fps ∼18% 41.2 (34^min) fps ∼20% 57.8 (51^min) fps ∼29% 88.4 (79^min) fps ∼44% 129 (116^min) fps ∼64%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ Schenker XMG A505	12.8 (11^min) fps ∼10% 33.9 (28^min) fps ∼17% 37.4 (33^min) fps ∼19% 52.9 (48^min) fps ∼26% 84.4 (78^min) fps ∼42% 129 (118^min) fps ∼64%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ MSI PE60 2QD	11.9 (10^min) fps ∼10% 30.2 (26^min) fps ∼15% 34.3 (31^min) fps ∼17% 46.4 (43^min) fps ∼23% 75 (69^min) fps ∼37% 97 (92^min) fps ∼48%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, 4700MQ Schenker W504	10.4 (8^min) fps ∼8% 26.5 (22^min) fps ∼13% 30 (27^min) fps ∼15% 41.5 (36^min) fps ∼21% 66.7 (57^min) fps ∼33% 104 (96^min) fps ∼52%
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6700HQ MSI CX72 6QD	15.6 (14^min) fps ∼8% 31.7 (30^min) fps ∼16% 50.6 (48^min) fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, 5700HQ MSI GP62 2QD	14.7 (12^min) fps ∼7% 18.7 (17^min) fps ∼9% 31.5 (29^min) fps ∼16% 50.2 (48^min) fps ∼25%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P Asus N551ZU-CN007H	22.3 (18^min) fps ∼11% 24.7 (22^min) fps ∼12% 30.1 (22^min) fps ∼15% 37.8 (35^min) fps ∼19%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M, 2970M MSI CX61 2QC 2970M MS-16GD	23.9 (21^min) fps ∼12% 30.1 (21^min) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M, 4200M MSI CX61-i572M	7.3 fps ∼4% 15.8 fps ∼8% 24.8 fps ∼12%
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4700MQ Schenker W504	8.9 (8^min) fps ∼4% 15 (13^min) fps ∼7% 24.2 (23^min) fps ∼12%

DirectX 12 vs. DirectX 11

The DirectX 12 mode leaves mixed impressions. While AMD models often work well with the new Microsoft API, Nvidia chips struggle. GeForce users should also avoid DX 12 in Battlefield 1. Both the GTX 1060 as well as the GTX 960M delivered worse (repeatable) results compared to DX 11 (sometimes more than 10%). AMD's RX 480 on the other hand was slightly faster in DirectX 12 compared to DirectX 11 (benchmark sequence: +1 FPS @Ultra).

DirectX Performance	GeForce GTX 1060 & Core i7-6700K	GeForce GTX 960M & Core i7-4720HQ
FHD / High @DX 11	104 fps (min: 95)	37.4 fps (min: 33)
FHD / High @DX 12	92,3 fps (min: 79)	35.2 fps (min: 29)
FHD / Medium @DX 11	143 fps (min: 134)	52.9 fps (min: 48)
FHD / Medium @DX 12	123 fps (min: 112)	47.4 fps (min: 43)

Multiplayer vs. Singleplayer

There are no concerns for the multiplayer performance. We played three different multiplayer maps to check whether the benchmark sequence is representative. The tool Fraps recorded about 10 minutes of gameplay with the GeForce GTX 1060 in each case (1920x1080 pixels, maximum settings). The results were very similar to the single-player campaign.

Multiplayer Performance	Notebookcheck Benchmark Sequence	Argonne Forest	Sinai Desert	Quentin Scar
FHD / Ultra @GeForce GTX 1060	~95 fps	~90 fps	~107 fps	~88 fps

Overview

Test Systems

Desktop-PCs	Custom Nvidia	Custom AMD
Mainboard	Asus Z170-A	Asus Z97-Deluxe
Processor	Intel Core i7-6700K (Skylake)	Intel Core i7-4790K (Haswell)
GPU	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5) Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (4 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X) Asus GeForce GTX 980 Ti (6 GB GDDR5) XFX Radeon R9 Fury (4 GB HBM) Sapphire Radeon R9 290X (4 GB GDDR5) Sapphire Radeon R9 280X (3 GB GDDR5) MSI Radeon R7 370 (2 GB GDDR5)
Memory	2 x 8 GB DDR4-2133	2 x 4 GB DDR3-1600
Storage	Crucial MX100 SSD (256 GB) Crucial M500 SSD (480 GB) OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB) OCZ Trion 150 SSD (960 GB)	Intel SSD 530 (240 GB) OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)
OS	Windows 10 Pro 64-bit	Windows 10 Home 64-bit

Schenker Notebooks	Schenker W504	Schenker XMG A505	Schenker S413
Mainboard	Intel HM87	Intel HM87	Intel HM87
Processor	Intel Core i7-4700MQ (Haswell)	Intel Core i7-4720HQ (Haswell)	Intel Core i7-4750HQ (Haswell)
GPU	Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M (8 GB GDDR5) GTX 970M (6 GB GDDR5) GTX 880M (8 GB GDDR5) GTX 870M (6 GB GDDR5) GTX 860M Kepler (4 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Memory	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600	2x 4 GB DDR3-1600	2x 8 GB DDR3-1600
Storage	Samsung SSD 840 EVO (250 GB)	Micron M600 SSD (128 GB) HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HDD (1000 GB)	Intel SSD
OS	Windows 10 Pro 64-bit	Windows 10 Home 64-bit	Windows 10 Home 64-bit

MSI Notebooks	MSI GE72	MSI PE60	MSI GP62	MSI CX61	MSI CX61
Mainboard	Intel HM170	Intel HM170	Intel HM86	Intel HM86	Intel HM86
Processor	Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Skylake)	Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Skylake)	Intel Core i7-5700HQ (Broadwell)	Intel Celeron 2970M (Haswell)	Intel Core i5-4200M (Haswell)
GPU	Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M 2016 (2 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M (2 GB GDDR5)	Nvidia GeForce 940M (2 GB DDR3)	Nvidia GeForce 920M (2 GB DDR3)	Nvidia GeForce GT 720M (2 GB DDR3)
Memory	1 x 8 GB DDR4-2133	2 x 4 GB DDR4-2133	1 x 8 GB DDR3-1600	1 x 8 GB DDR3-1600	1 x 8 GB DDR3-1600
Storage	Toshiba THNSNJ128G8NU SSD (128 GB) WDC WD10JPVX HDD (1000 GB) OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)			Toshiba MQ01ABF050 HDD (500 GB)	WDC Scorpio Blue HDD (1000 GB)
OS	Windows 10 Home 64-bit	Windows 10	Windows 10	Windows 10	Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

Asus Notebooks	Asus G752VS	Asus N551ZU
Mainboard	Intel CM236	AMD K15.1
Processor	Intel Core i7-6820HK (Skylake)	AMD FX-7600P (Kaveri)
GPU	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5)	AMD Radeon R9 M280X (4 GB GDDR5)
Memory	4 x 16 GB DDR4-2400	2 x 4 GB DDR3-1600
Storage	Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 SSD (512 GB)	Samsung SSD 830 (256 GB)
OS	Windows 10 Pro 64-bit	Windows 10 64-bit

4K Monitor	Nvidia driver	AMD driver	Intel driver
2 x Asus PB287Q	ForceWare 375.57	Crimson 16.10.2	15.40.28.4501

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser - Managing Editor Gaming Laptops - 581 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009

I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly being on high-performance gaming laptops.

Translator: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1535 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

I grew up with modern consumer electronics and my first computer was a Commodore C64, which encouraged my interest in building my own systems. I started working as a review editor for Notebookcheck during my dual studies at Siemens. Currently, I am mainly responsible for dealing with business laptops and mobile workstations. It’s a great experience to be able to review the latest devices and technologies and then compare them with each other.

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Battlefield 1 Notebook and Desktop Benchmarks

Florian Glaser, 2016-10-31 (Update: 2022-01-21)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Battlefield 1 (2016)
Pos	Model	low 1280x720 Low Preset	med. 1366x768 Medium Preset FXAA	high 1920x1080 High Preset TAA	ultra 1920x1080 Ultra Preset TAA	4K 3840x2160 High Preset TAA
28	NVIDIA Titan RTX	193.7	179.9	166.2	154.2	111.8
36	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)	200ⁿ²	198ⁿ²	192ⁿ²	185ⁿ²	115ⁿ²
49	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop)	193	178	165	152	93
54	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)	193.15ⁿ²	178.75ⁿ²	162.8ⁿ²	150.55ⁿ²	89ⁿ²
69	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)	200	196	169	158	76.7
70	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	175.9	156.8	138.2	124.9	104
74	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	194	180	166	154	82
76	AMD Radeon VII	187	169	153	138	82
78	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)	179.4ⁿ³	156.9ⁿ³	150ⁿ³	141.3ⁿ³	75.8ⁿ³
84	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)	200	193	162	147.5ⁿ²	70.65ⁿ²
88	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	193	175	157	143	68
97	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	165.4	141.5	120.6	113.3
99	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q			140ⁿ²	131.5ⁿ²	65
100	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	179	162	143	133	59.8
102	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	196.9ⁿ¹²	182.2ⁿ¹²	157.25ⁿ¹²	141.4ⁿ¹²	62.9ⁿ¹²
103	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile			153.5ⁿ⁴	136.5ⁿ⁴	58.7ⁿ³
114	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	195	182	150	136	62
121	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)	192.1ⁿ²	179.6ⁿ²	136.75ⁿ²	122.05ⁿ²	52.4ⁿ²
124	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q			130	113	49
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Battlefield 1
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
126	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	177.75ⁿ⁶	159.6ⁿ⁶	122.3ⁿ¹⁰	111.3ⁿ¹⁰	50.9ⁿ³
129	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)	194	183	130	117	51.4
144	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti				115	55.1
146	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	123.2	105.5	106ⁿ³	96.4ⁿ³	39ⁿ²
151	AMD Radeon R9 Fury				102	46.6
153	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	199	194	105	96.9	39.2
161	AMD Radeon RX 590 (Desktop)	192.4	151.6	112.2	98.6	43.2
162	AMD Radeon RX 580 (Desktop)	173.6	155	101.8	88.5	40.2
167	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop)	174.1ⁿ²	167ⁿ²	97.95ⁿ²	88.6ⁿ²	36.45ⁿ²
168	AMD Radeon RX 570 (Desktop)	192	183	100	89	39.2
171	AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop)			99	88.95ⁿ²	38.1
172	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	126.4ⁿ⁴	100.75ⁿ⁶	77.6ⁿ⁹	73.6ⁿ⁹	30.9ⁿ²
180	AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)	125	112	87.4	75.9	32.7
187	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)	193	158	78	71	28.8
188	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile			74.5	71.1
192	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970				87	37.5
193	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q		154	76	67.8	25.3
199	AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)			88.8ⁿ³	79.9ⁿ³	35.2
212	AMD Radeon R9 290X			39.7	96
219	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M	138	124	77.4	69.8	29.1
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Battlefield 1
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
223	AMD Radeon R9 280X			66.7	60.2	17
227	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	114.7ⁿ³	98.15ⁿ⁴	56.7ⁿ⁵	50.8ⁿ⁵	19.8
228	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	199	144	69	62.4	25.2
234	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	142	122	58.3	55.4	22.7
242*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q	122.15ⁿ²	102.6ⁿ²	54.9ⁿ²	51.45ⁿ²	20.9ⁿ²
250	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)	104	92ⁿ²	40.55ⁿ²	37.1ⁿ²	13.9
251	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	121.4ⁿ³	101.7ⁿ³	49.9ⁿ³	44.4ⁿ³
254	AMD Radeon R7 370		82	42.6	40.1	3.3
256	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M	140	93.8	45.5	44	15
257*	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	144.7	89.2	45	41.3	15.9
265	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M		82	39	34.5
268	AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)	161	107	51	46.6	18.8
270	AMD Radeon HD 7870			52	44.7
271	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M	130	104	51.4	42.5	17
273	AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)	79	63.2	36.7	29.3
275	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M	129	88.4	41.2	37	14.4
277	AMD Radeon HD 8970M	149.3	99.9	53.4	50.1
290	AMD Radeon Pro 560X	134		39.2	35.6	15.2
292	AMD Radeon Pro 460	132.6		40.9	35.4
296	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M	129	84.4	37.4	33.9	12.8
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Battlefield 1
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
303	AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)	69.1	52.2	23.8
308	AMD Radeon Pro 555	113		30.2	25.9
309	AMD Radeon Pro 455	109		28.9	25.3
310	NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)	104.8	64.3	26.5	24.6	7.8
314	NVIDIA GeForce MX150	86.95ⁿ²	55.85ⁿ²	26.5ⁿ²	22.9ⁿ²
323*	AMD Radeon RX 540	54.2	30.8	12.2	10.7
325	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M	104	66.7	30	26.5	10.4
333	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	97	75	34.3	30.2	11.9
334	AMD Radeon Pro 450	101		24.2	21.7
344	AMD Radeon R9 M280X	37.8	30.1	24.7	22.3
430	NVIDIA GeForce MX130	57.2ⁿ²	36.25ⁿ²	18.2ⁿ²	16.4ⁿ²
431	NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	49.4ⁿ⁴	30.3ⁿ⁴	14.85ⁿ⁴	12.8ⁿ³
434	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	46.5ⁿ²	28.3ⁿ²	13.65ⁿ²	12.35ⁿ²
435	NVIDIA GeForce 940M	50.2	31.5	14.7
437	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	45.5	29.7	13.4	12
450	AMD Radeon R7 M445	40	28	13	12
476	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650	46.1	29.5
477	NVIDIA GeForce 930M	40.5	26.1
478	Intel Iris Graphics 550	49.6	29.8	15.1
479	AMD Radeon 530	28.5	19.1
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Battlefield 1
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
485*	NVIDIA GeForce MX110	46.5	27.8	13.3	12.1
486	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640	29.2ⁿ³	21.9ⁿ²	10.15ⁿ²
487	NVIDIA GeForce 920MX	49.2	29.1	13.8	12.5
488	Intel Iris Graphics 540	43.4	25.3	12.6
524*	AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)	23.3	16.7	8.3
527	AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri)	13.9
529*	AMD Radeon R7 M460	30	20.6	10.1
534	NVIDIA GeForce 920M	30.1	23.9
539	AMD Radeon R7 M440	31.8	22.7	9.6	9.6
555	Intel UHD Graphics 630	39.3	23.5
558	Intel HD Graphics 630	33.8	19.6
561	Intel HD Graphics 530	29.7	18.3	7.5
564	AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)	16.5	12.1
565	Intel UHD Graphics 620	29.7ⁿ³	18.8ⁿ³	8.8	7.9
566	Intel HD Graphics 620	30.2ⁿ³	17.2	8.2
601	Intel HD Graphics 5600	29.8	19.3	8.8	7.6
627	AMD Radeon HD 8650G	22.9	13.4
637	AMD Radeon R5 M430	23.7	16.1
638	AMD Radeon R5 M255	27.4	20.1	9.3
639*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	25.5	15.7	7.1
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Battlefield 1
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	4K
643	Intel HD Graphics 520	30.1	15.7	7.3	6.5
646	NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M	24.8	15.8	7.3
667	Intel HD Graphics 4600	21.1ⁿ²	13.4ⁿ²	5.2
669	Intel HD Graphics 5500	20.7	13.3
695	Intel HD Graphics 615	13	9.1
739	Intel HD Graphics 610	16.1	8.9
740	Intel HD Graphics 4400	14.1	9
788	AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)	8.2
790	AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L)	13.2	9.3
865	Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)	14.1

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.