Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

The Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTX is a graphics adapter for laptops based on the G92 core. In general, the GPU is similar to that of the 8800M GTX but with 112 unified shader cores instead of 96. The chip is manufactured in a 65nm process and because of the high shader count, the power consumption (75 Watt of the MXM board) can be quite high. As a result, the 9800M GTX is only found in larger laptops with relatively powerful cooling solutions.

The performance of the chip is noticeably better than both the 9800M GT and GTS because of the additional shader units (see benchmarks below). Therefore, DirectX 10 games of 2008 should all be playable in high details.

As with all cards with DirectX 10 capabilities, the GeForce 9800M GTX renders 3D images using "Unified Shaders". Dedicated pixel- and vertex shaders have been dropped in favor of stream processors, which have now taken up much of the rendering burden. Furthermore, the shader units are higher clocked than the core chip itself at 1250 MHz.

A feature found in the GeForce 9000 series is the integrated PureVideo HD video processor. The GPU is able to assist the CPU in the decoding of H.264-, VC-1-, MPEG2- and WMV9 video material.

In conjunction with the Nvidia 9100M G integrated graphics, the 9800M GTX supports Hybrid-SLI known as HybridPower. HybridPower is a technique available only in Windows Vista that allows users to choose between the integrated or dedicated graphics core for power-saving purposes. Eventually, graphics switching was seamlessly accomplished through drivers by Nvidia, a technology now known as Optimus. GeForceBoost is not supported with the 9800M GTX as there would be no performance gain when paired the integrated GPU.

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the 9800M GTX should be a bit slower than the GeForce 8800 GT, which has a higher memory clock rate.

The 9800M GTX was eventually succeeded by the GTX 260M. The latter is based off of the G92b core architecture and is produced in a 55nm fabrication process, leading to lower energy demands and heat dissipation.

GeForce 9800M Series

GeForce 9800M GT SLI compare 192 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI compare 128 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GTX 112 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GT compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GTS compare 64 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GS compare 64 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Pipelines112 - unified
Core Speed500 MHz
Shader Speed1250 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption75 Watt
Transistor Count754 Million
technology65 nm
FeaturesHybridPower, PureVideo HD, CUDA, PhysX ready
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement15.07.2008
InformationMXM 3
Link to Manufacturer


3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 4545     avg: 4743     median: 4825 (1%)     max: 4860 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 4110     avg: 4123     median: 4123 (2%)     max: 4136 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 32624     avg: 37419     median: 35460 (37%)     max: 44174 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 30864     avg: 31959     median: 31601 (17%)     max: 33411 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13912     avg: 16638     median: 16720.5 (18%)     max: 19197 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 9952     avg: 10292     median: 10138 (13%)     max: 10833 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead

low 800x600
77  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

high 1024x768
36  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

low 1024x768
85.6 91 114.5 143 ~ 109 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
55 58.2 64.2 92 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
35.9 38.1 40.2 49.6 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very High 1024x768
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

low 1024x768
111.5 119 125.6 ~ 119 fps    + Compare
med. 1024x768
56.6 58.4 62.8 ~ 59 fps    + Compare
high 1024x768
35.8 37.4 37.6 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

high 1024x768
24 28 ~ 26 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

high 1280x800
77  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

high 1024x768
210  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Doom 3

Doom 3

low 640x480
244.1  fps    + Compare
med. 640x480
240.6  fps    + Compare
high 800x600
249.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1024x768
224.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Crysis Warhead7715
Supreme Commander - FA Bench36
Crysis - GPU Benchmark1096741
Crysis - CPU Benchmark1195937
Call of Juarez Benchmark26
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion77
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark210
Doom 3244.1240.6249.4224.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps




For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
log 12. 15:01:49

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 May 2024 05:38:50 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.043s ... 0.044s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#5 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.044s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 772 +0.014s ... 0.058s

#7 got single benchmarks 772 +0.019s ... 0.077s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.16s ... 0.237s

#10 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.237s

#11 Got 32 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.24s

#12 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.24s

#13 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.244s

#14 benchmarks composed for output. +0.156s ... 0.4s

#15 return log +0.076s ... 0.476s

Gaming Performance

These benchmarks were conducted with high end notebooks (quad-core desktop CPU). Therefore, the performance with slower laptops may decrease.

Crysis: 1280x1024, very high: 22 fps -> not playable (in high playable)
Enemy Territory: Quake Wars: 1600x1200: 80 fps -> fluently playable
Half Life 2 - Episode 2: 1600x1200: 68 fps -> fluently playable 
Supreme Commander: 1600x1200: 55 fps -> fluently playable
World in Conflict: 1280x1024: 31 fps -> playable

GeForce 9M Series in comparison (Data from Nvidia with Desktop Q6600 CPU)
GeForce 9M Series in comparison (Data from Nvidia with Desktop Q6600 CPU)

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX graphics card


Review mySN XMG7 (Clevo M570TU) Notebook

A New Old Acquaintance Barely any other barebone is offered under so many different predicates as the M570 from Clevo. It's not very surprising, as it is a chic...
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX | 17.00" | 4.2 kg

AVADirect D901C: Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550, 17.00", 5.6 kg
  External Review » AVADirect D901C

Sager NP9262: Intel Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q9550, 17.00", 5.2 kg
  External Review » Sager NP9262

SCHENKER XMG7 : Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100, 17.10", 4.2 kg
  External Review » Schenker mySN XMG7

Rock Xtreme 780: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300, 17.00", 3.8 kg
  External Review » Rock Xtreme 780

Zepto Hydra A17: Intel Core 2 Duo P8600, 17.00", 4.1 kg
  External Review » Zepto Hydra A17

Toshiba Qosmio X305-Q725: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000, 17.00", 4.1 kg
  External Review » Toshiba Qosmio X305-Q725

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

Class 2

Radeon PRO W6600M *

Class 3

UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics 750

Class 4

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter