NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX

The Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTX is a graphics adapter for laptops based on the G92 core. In general, the GPU is similar to that of the 8800M GTX but with 112 unified shader cores instead of 96. The chip is manufactured in a 65nm process and because of the high shader count, the power consumption (75 Watt of the MXM board) can be quite high. As a result, the 9800M GTX is only found in larger laptops with relatively powerful cooling solutions.

The performance of the chip is noticeably better than both the 9800M GT and GTS because of the additional shader units (see benchmarks below). Therefore, DirectX 10 games of 2008 should all be playable in high details.

As with all cards with DirectX 10 capabilities, the GeForce 9800M GTX renders 3D images using "Unified Shaders". Dedicated pixel- and vertex shaders have been dropped in favor of stream processors, which have now taken up much of the rendering burden. Furthermore, the shader units are higher clocked than the core chip itself at 1250 MHz.

A feature found in the GeForce 9000 series is the integrated PureVideo HD video processor. The GPU is able to assist the CPU in the decoding of H.264-, VC-1-, MPEG2- and WMV9 video material.

In conjunction with the Nvidia 9100M G integrated graphics, the 9800M GTX supports Hybrid-SLI known as HybridPower. HybridPower is a technique available only in Windows Vista that allows users to choose between the integrated or dedicated graphics core for power-saving purposes. Eventually, graphics switching was seamlessly accomplished through drivers by Nvidia, a technology now known as Optimus. GeForceBoost is not supported with the 9800M GTX as there would be no performance gain when paired the integrated GPU.

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the 9800M GTX should be a bit slower than the GeForce 8800 GT, which has a higher memory clock rate.

The 9800M GTX was eventually succeeded by the GTX 260M. The latter is based off of the G92b core architecture and is produced in a 55nm fabrication process, leading to lower energy demands and heat dissipation.

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia GeForce 9800M GS is a graphics adapter for laptops and based on the G94 core with 64 shader processors. The chip is produced in 55nm (as the 1024 MB versions of the 9800M GTS and the GTS 160M). Because of the max. 512 MB GDDR3 the TDP is lower (60 Watt) than the 9800M GTS (512 and 1024 MB version: 75W).

Because of the additional shaders but lower clock speed than the GTS, the 9800M GS is between the 9700M GTS and 9800M GTS. Therefore, DirectX 10 games of 2008 should all be playable in medium to high details.

As all cards with DirectX 10 capabilities, the GeForce 9800M GS renders the 3D images using "Unified Shaders". There don't exist any more dedicated pixel- and vertex shaders but 64 so called stream processors make the graphic work (which has been done by pixel and vertex shaders in former days). Furthermore, the shader units are higher clocked than the chip.

An advantage of the GeForce 9000 series is the integrated PureVideo HD video processor. It is able to help with the decoding of H.264-, VC-1-, MPEG2- and WMV9 video material in HD quality and eases the CPU.

In conjunction with the Nvidia 9100M G integrated graphics, the 9800M GS supports Hybrid-SLI (only HybridPower). HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. This works only in Windows Vista. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later Nvidia wants to switch automatically in the drivers. GeForceBoost is not supported with this card, as there would be no performance gain to combine the integrated GPU with the 9800M GS.

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the 9800M GS should be a bit slower than the GeForce 9600M GT.

NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTXNVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
GeForce 9800M Series
GeForce 9800M GT SLI compare 192 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI compare 128 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GTX 112 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GT compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GTS compare 64 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GS 64 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GT SLI compare 192 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI compare 128 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GTX 112 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GT compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GTS compare 64 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9800M GS 64 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
CodenameNB9E-GTXNB9E-GS1
ArchitectureG9xG9x
Pipelines112 - unified64 - unified
Core Speed500 MHz530 MHz
Shader Speed1250 MHz1325 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Transistors754 Million504 Million
technology65 nm55 nm
FeaturesHybridPower, PureVideo HD, CUDA, PhysX ready
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement15.07.2008 01.11.2008
InformationMXM 3MXM 3
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_980...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 32624     avg: 37419     median: 35460 (37%)     max: 44174 Points
min: 27477     avg: 28741     median: 28740.5 (30%)     max: 30004 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 30864     avg: 31959     median: 31601 (17%)     max: 33411 Points
min: 25967     avg: 26271     median: 26270.5 (14%)     max: 26574 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13912     avg: 16638     median: 16720.5 (24%)     max: 19197 Points
min: 13245     avg: 13587     median: 13586.5 (20%)     max: 13928 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 + NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS → 79% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
GeForce 9800M GS:
41.4 50 ~ 46 fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
high 1024x768
GeForce 9800M GS:
49  fps
Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead

2008
low 800x600
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
77  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
15  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
GeForce 9800M GS:
187.5 215.2 ~ 201 fps
med. 1024x768
GeForce 9800M GS:
83.9 84.9 ~ 84 fps
high 1280x1024
GeForce 9800M GS:
46 47.7 ~ 47 fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
36  fps
100%
GeForce 9800M GS:
36.1  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
85.6 91 114.5 143 ~ 109 fps
73%
GeForce 9800M GS:
48.7 88.2 103.5 ~ 80 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
55 58.2 64.2 92 ~ 67 fps
67%
GeForce 9800M GS:
32.4 47.5 50 50.1 ~ 45 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
35.9 38.1 40.2 49.6 ~ 41 fps
68%
GeForce 9800M GS:
22.6 30 30.1 ~ 28 fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
111.5 119 125.6 ~ 119 fps
73%
GeForce 9800M GS:
50.8 101.8 107.7 ~ 87 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
56.6 58.4 62.8 ~ 59 fps
75%
GeForce 9800M GS:
29.8 44.2 50 50.3 ~ 44 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
35.8 37.4 37.6 ~ 37 fps
70%
GeForce 9800M GS:
20.8 28.7 28.8 ~ 26 fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
GeForce 9800M GS:
56 57 66 ~ 60 fps
high 1024x768
GeForce 9800M GS:
32 34 37 ~ 34 fps
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
24 28 ~ 26 fps
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

2006
high 1280x800
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
77  fps
78%
GeForce 9800M GS:
60  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
210  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
GeForce 9800M GS:
102  fps
med. 800x600
GeForce 9800M GS:
55  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce 9800M GS:
48  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
244.1  fps
53%
GeForce 9800M GS:
120 138.2 ~ 129 fps
med. 640x480
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
240.6  fps
54%
GeForce 9800M GS:
117.7 140.9 ~ 129 fps
high 800x600
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
249.4  fps
51%
GeForce 9800M GS:
120.8 135.8 ~ 128 fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9800M GTX:
224.2  fps
56%
GeForce 9800M GS:
117.8 134 ~ 126 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
GeForce 9800M GS:
1122  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS → 68%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 80%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)