Schenker XMG7
Specifications
Average of 6 scores (from 7 reviews)
Reviews for the Schenker XMG7
Source: PC Games Hardware - 8/09
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 94% price: 70%
Source: Tom's Hardware
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2009
Rating: performance: 90% features: 80% emissions: 40%
Source: Gamestar
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 98% features: 90% display: 90%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/20/2009
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 70% performance: 70% features: 50% display: 60% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/08/2008
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 60% performance: 70% features: 50% display: 50% mobility: 50% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 60% emissions: 60%
Source: PC Welt
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/07/2008
Rating: Total score: 29% performance: 87% features: 48% mobility: 3% ergonomy: 28%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/12/2008
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 99% display: 75% mobility: 56% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 86% emissions: 75%
Comment
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX:Similar to the 8800M GTX, the 9800M GTX is based on the G92 chip but includes more unified shaders. The 9800M GTX was later succeeded by the 55nm GTX 260M.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.Intel Core 2 Extreme: The fastest Core 2 Duo variants of Intel are called Core 2 Extreme. Technically, these processors are based on a Merom/Penryn (X9000) core like all other Core 2 Duo processors, too.
X9100:
The X9100 is the fastest dual-core of the Core 2 series and thanks to a free multiplicator can be overclocked easily. Later the expensive X9100 was substituted by the cheaper and more power saving T9900 (with a fixed multiplicator).
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.17.1":
This large display size is used for laptops which are mainly intended for an use on a desk.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.4.2 kg:
This weight is representative for typical laptops with a 14-16 inch display-diagonal.
79.67%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.