New World Performance Analysis

Waiting at Login Screen Simulator 2021. Even if New World is a good game, its launch has been one of the biggest disasters in the gaming world this year. Nonetheless, we took great pains to conduct our usual performance analysis.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Stanislav Kokhanyuk), Published 10/05/2021 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

Technology

It is quite annoying, to say the least, that Amazon’s servers got overwhelmed when it released its AAA title. Despite Amazon’s massive server infrastructure, some gamers had to wait for hours to log into servers with just 100 to 1000 players. An additional aggravating factor is that there is no way to transfer your character from one server to another.

We were forced to create new characters and delete the old ones to conduct these benchmarks because the game only allows players to have two characters in any given region. Each time we created a new character, we skipped the tutorial and hoped that our character would end up in the right place. This is why the scope of our performance analysis has been reduced considerably.

Once you get into the actual game, though, things improve significantly. The game runs very well. We did not encounter any performance drops or lag spikes.

The game leaves a very good impression. The animations appear smooth, controls are not clunky, the menu is laid out very well. Moreover, the levels and character design and combat system are quite impressive. The story is also very good, compared to other titles in this genre. All in all, New World creatively blends colonisation with monsters (as in the pirate games, for example).

New World is a very visually striking title. It looks better than most other MMOs. Textures, lighting and effects all impress. The beautiful day-night cycle makes the game feels very atmospheric.

The graphics menu is very comprehensive. The Visuals tab contains more than 20 settings. In the first section, the field of view, resolution, brightness and contrast can be changed. There are more than 10 settings in the second section. In the last section, users can enable vertical synchronisation and dynamic resolution scaling. The frame rate can also be capped, and the number of nameplates that can appear at the same time can be adjusted.

We conducted our benchmarks with all options disabled (except for V-Sync). Fortunately, the graphics changes do not require a restart. If that were not the case, then fine-tuning graphics settings would have been quite challenging, given all of the server-side issues.

Benchmark

As can be seen from the video below, our benchmark tales place in the starting location, which is known as First Light. We run from the gate to the well and back. The entire run takes about 45 seconds. We capture frame rate data with CapFrameX.

Because a lot of players are present at starting locations on popular servers, these benchmarks should generally be viewed as the worst-case scenario. New World is a very CPU-demanding game, which means that high-end GPUs can get bottlenecked by the CPU. Lowering graphics settings can also lead to CPU bottlenecks.

Results

The benchmarks were conducted mainly using the laptops which our partners MSI and XMG (Schenker Technologies) lent us.

FHD (1920x1080)

Despite the size of the game, MMO flare and impressive visuals, New World has rather modest system requirements. Sure, it cannot run on low-end GPUs with 2 GB of VRAM such as the GeForce MX450. However, lower mid-range graphics cards with 4 GB of VRAM (GeForce GTX 1650; 1650 Ti) can handle the game at medium, or even higher, settings. Of course, such GPUs cannot provide a rock-solid 60 FPS experience. To achieve decent frame rates at the highest settings, gamers will need a Radeon RX 5600M or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti/GeForce RTX 3050 Ti.

New World
1920x1080 Low Video Quality 1920x1080 Medium Video Quality 1920x1080 High Video Quality 1920x1080 Very High Video Quality
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	99.8 (42.6^min, 46.6^P0.1, 56.3^P1) fps ∼17% 84.6 (36.9^min, 39.5^P0.1, 47.3^P1) fps ∼18% 81.7 (34.7^min, 35.8^P0.1, 44.8^P1) fps ∼19% 79.4 (31.8^min, 37.5^P0.1, 46.8^P1) fps ∼19%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	90.2 (37.5^min, 41.7^P0.1, 51.3^P1) fps ∼15% 83.3 (33.6^min, 37.5^P0.1, 47^P1) fps ∼18% 80.8 (23^min, 35.3^P0.1, 42.7^P1) fps ∼19% 74.9 (26.1^min, 33.4^P0.1, 40.3^P1) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	87.6 (33^min, 37.8^P0.1, 47.6^P1) fps ∼15% 74.8 (31.7^min, 33.1^P0.1, 38.5^P1) fps ∼16% 70.8 (29.8^min, 31.9^P0.1, 37.7^P1) fps ∼16% 70.6 (26.2^min, 31.2^P0.1, 37.2^P1) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	86.6 (37.7^min, 41.3^P0.1, 51.5^P1) fps ∼15% 78.2 (35.5^min, 39^P0.1, 47.3^P1) fps ∼17% 73.4 (27.4^min, 34.3^P0.1, 41.5^P1) fps ∼17% 68.6 (30.1^min, 33.3^P0.1, 39.5^P1) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	86.1 (28.6^min, 35.6^P0.1, 48.6^P1) fps ∼15% 71 (25.3^min, 31.2^P0.1, 37^P1) fps ∼15% 66.1 (21.5^min, 30^P0.1, 36.2^P1) fps ∼15% 62.3 (23.3^min, 27.6^P0.1, 32.3^P1) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	85.8 (33.3^min, 38.3^P0.1, 48.5^P1) fps ∼15% 74.5 (28.5^min, 31.4^P0.1, 38.2^P1) fps ∼16% 72.4 (31.3^min, 33.2^P0.1, 38.3^P1) fps ∼17% 70.1 (28.4^min, 31.1^P0.1, 38^P1) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	72.8 (33.5^min, 36.9^P0.1, 43.9^P1) fps ∼12% 62.8 (33.7^min, 34.9^P0.1, 39.2^P1) fps ∼14% 59.4 (27^min, 31.8^P0.1, 39.4^P1) fps ∼14% 47.6 (23.5^min, 25.9^P0.1, 31.5^P1) fps ∼11%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	69.4 (21.3^min, 31^P0.1, 42.7^P1) fps ∼12% 55.7 (32.3^min, 33.2^P0.1, 36.6^P1) fps ∼12% 50.7 (25.8^min, 28.2^P0.1, 31.7^P1) fps ∼12% 44.7 (18.1^min, 21.2^P0.1, 26.6^P1) fps ∼11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	66.8 (26.8^min, 29.3^P0.1, 35.1^P1) fps ∼11% 57.9 (19.5^min, 23^P0.1, 29.2^P1) fps ∼13% 55.9 (16.5^min, 24^P0.1, 30.5^P1) fps ∼13% 50 (18.6^min, 19.9^P0.1, 24.8^P1) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	62.3 (29.5^min, 31.7^P0.1, 37.9^P1) fps ∼11% 53.7 (27.3^min, 29.8^P0.1, 35.2^P1) fps ∼12% 48.6 (23.4^min, 28.4^P0.1, 31.3^P1) fps ∼11% 36.4 (15.9^min, 19.1^P0.1, 22.2^P1) fps ∼9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	54.3 (18.6^min, 23.7^P0.1, 29.4^P1) fps ∼9% 44.4 (14.8^min, 20.6^P0.1, 23.6^P1) fps ∼10% 41.9 (15.6^min, 16.3^P0.1, 22.2^P1) fps ∼10% 30.6 (9.86^min, 12.8^P0.1, 19.9^P1) fps ∼7%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15	33.7 (2.84^min, 7.84^P0.1, 15.9^P1) fps ∼6% 25.9 (12.4^min, 13.3^P0.1, 16^P1) fps ∼6% 21.8 (12.9^min, 13.7^P0.1, 15.5^P1) fps ∼5% 9.54 (6.81^min, 6.82^P0.1, 6.96^P1) fps ∼2%

QHD (2560x1440)

The GeForce RTX 3060 will allow gamers to enjoy New World at high settings at 1440p.

New World
2560x1440 Very High Video Quality
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	70 (25.2^min, 34.3^P0.1, 39.4^P1) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	69.7 (27.4^min, 32.3^P0.1, 37.9^P1) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	67.2 (29.5^min, 31.2^P0.1, 37^P1) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	66.4 (33.6^min, 34.9^P0.1, 41.5^P1) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	66.2 (19.1^min, 31^P0.1, 40^P1) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	52.9 (6.59^min, 27^P0.1, 32.1^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	38 (18.7^min, 20.3^P0.1, 23.7^P1) fps ∼9%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	32.6 (11.7^min, 12^P0.1, 18.7^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	32.4 (9.77^min, 13.3^P0.1, 19.9^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	25.3 (12.7^min, 15.6^P0.1, 18.4^P1) fps ∼6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	18.1 (5.5^min, 9.59^P0.1, 12.9^P1) fps ∼5%

UHD (3840x2160)

At 4K, the title becomes really demanding. Even the GeForce RTX 3070 (Mobile) and RTX 3080 (Mobile) struggle to achieves decent frame rates at 4K at the highest settings.

New World
3840x2160 Very High Video Quality
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	69.1 (25.9^min, 28.7^P0.1, 36.1^P1) fps ∼20%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	68.1 (27.1^min, 29.9^P0.1, 35.7^P1) fps ∼20%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	52.6 (25.5^min, 30.7^P0.1, 35.8^P1) fps ∼15%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	42.9 (20.5^min, 20.9^P0.1, 27.3^P1) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	40 (19.4^min, 23.6^P0.1, 27.4^P1) fps ∼11%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	29.7 (17.8^min, 18^P0.1, 20^P1) fps ∼9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	17.8 (5.09^min, 8.67^P0.1, 12.3^P1) fps ∼5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	17.7 (6.86^min, 10.5^P0.1, 13.3^P1) fps ∼5%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	17.2 (5.26^min, 6.07^P0.1, 10.2^P1) fps ∼5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	12.2 (8.39^min, 8.65^P0.1, 9.22^P1) fps ∼3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	10.4 (7.09^min, 7.24^P0.1, 7.93^P1) fps ∼3%

Note

Because benchmarking video games is very time consuming and is often constrained by installation/activation limits, at the time of publishing, we were able to provide only a part of our performance analysis of New World. Other graphics cards will be added in the coming days and weeks.

Overview

Test Systems

Device	GPU	CPU	RAM	OS
XMG Neo 15	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 @165 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Neo 17	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Core 15	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 @130 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Focus 17	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti @75 W TGP (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP65	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-9750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GP75	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI GL75	Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15	Nvidia GeForce MX450 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-11370H	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Dell G5 15 SE	AMD Radeon RX 5600M (6 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
MSI Prestige 14 Evo	Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs)	Intel Core i7-1185G7	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop PC I	MSI GeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6X) MSI GeForce RTX 3080 (10 GB GDDR6X) MSI GeForce RTX 3070 (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-9900K	4 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
Desktop PC II	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6) PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5) AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	2 x 32 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit

4K monitors	Nvidia drivers	AMD drivers
Asus PB287Q, Philips Brilliance 329P9H, Acer Predator XB321HK	ForceWare 472.12	Adrenalin 21.9.2

Read all 3 comments / answer

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Sebastian Jentsch - Managing Editor Consumer Laptops - 1813 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2010

Computers always had an important place in my life, starting with an Intel 80286 microprocessor in the early 1990s. I became interested in the productive side of technology, especially in campus radio, while studying at TU Chemnitz and during a trainee program in Belfast. Hardware interests led me to manage Notebookjournal.de, which is now a division of Notebooksbilliger, for a few years. I became self-employed in 2010 and took the next logical step in my career by starting to write for Notebookcheck.

contact me via: Xing

Translator: Stanislav Kokhanyuk - Translator - 78 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2021

I am a big fan of technology, which is why I try to keep up with it. Among my other passions are literature and writing, and so it should not be surprising to anyone at all that I have a four-year bachelor's degree in philology. However, my interests are not limited just to the world of technology, or, for that matter, the world of literature. I am also interested in people and the stories they have to tell. And more recently, I took an interest in artificial intelligence.

Please share our article, every link counts!

.170

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > New World Performance Analysis

Florian Glaser, 2021-10- 5 (Update: 2021-10- 5)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > New World (2021)
Pos	Model	low 1280x720 Low Video Quality	med. 1920x1080 Medium Video Quality	high 1920x1080 High Video Quality	ultra 1920x1080 Very High Video Quality	QHD 2560x1440 Very High Video Quality	4K 3840x2160 Very High Video Quality
1	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	215	188	183.5	175.3	174.8	149.3
2	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX	210	185.1	168.1	158.8	156.5	103.3
5	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT	213	177.8	164.1	156.9	147	84.4
6	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	229	191.7	174.9	164.9	153.7	81.4
7	AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT	146.9	109.7	98.1	98.1	98.6	76.4
9	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	199	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ³	0ⁿ²	69.1
10	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti	194	165	153	142	133	79.2
15	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB	173.1	129.2	116.1	113.5	103.9	67.6
16	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080		74.8	70.8	70.6	69.7	68.1
21	AMD Radeon RX 6800	138	101	89.3	83.3	79	49.5
22	NVIDIA Titan RTX	180	139	131	123	101	54.5
24	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	126.4	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
26	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070	166.9	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
27	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	131.3	108.7	98.8	98.3	86.6	42.6
29	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	130	105	102	95.8	78.4	39.6
30	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	0ⁿ³	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
31	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	176.2	131.2	117.8	109.5	76.9	40.3
33	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	32.2
39	AMD Radeon RX 6800M	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²		34.1
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >New World
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
40	AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT	156.4	118	108.1	97.8	64	32.6
41	AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT	149	107	97.4	86.7	57.8	31.4
44	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
46	AMD Radeon RX 6800S		96.3	85.2	75.8	55.7	28.2
48	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060	161	112	105	95.9	65.3	33.7
56	AMD Radeon RX 6700M		82.2	78.5	73
58	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	206	128	116	103	70.7	37.3
62	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	179	122	116	106	72.7	37.8
64*	Intel Arc A770M	101.9	84.2	77.6	74.8		35.2
66	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	143	103	96.6	85.5	58.5
71	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ³	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ³	0ⁿ²
77	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	173	110	102	89.8	60.1	31.4
78	AMD Radeon RX 6600	138	93.5	88.3	79.5	51.1	31.4
81	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	147	94	85.1	74.8	49	29.3
83	AMD Radeon RX 6600M	113.7	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	52.4	31.3
109	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050	161	79.1	68.5	61.6	40.9	28.1
111	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	147	88.5	79	68.5	43.8	28.2
119	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	157	82.6	75.1	0ⁿ²	41.8
120	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	145	62.1	55.3	43.4	29.8	16.8
121	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	124	59.2	52.5	45.3	32.5	21.3
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >New World
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
125	AMD Radeon RX 5600M		55.7	50.7	44.7	32.6	17.2
127	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		57.9	55.9	50	38	17.8
128	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	0ⁿ³	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ⁴	0ⁿ²	17.7
132	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	143	71.1	65	55.4	36.8	25.2
135	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	136	66.6	60.8	47.2	33.7	21.2
141	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU	95	65.2	60.2	49.2
145	AMD Radeon RX 6500M	70.3	53	46.2	40.4
159	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	88.6	53.6		40.4
160	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile		53.7	48.6	36.4	25.3	12.2
173	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)	106	50.7	45.9	35.7	28.8	16.1
174	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		44.4	41.9	30.6	18.1	10.4
216	AMD Radeon 680M	70.4	29.7	28.3	22.9
222*	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	41.6	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	8.7
237	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	63.2	0ⁿ²	28.4	22.5
258	AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	56	27	24.2	19
280	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	17.1
296	NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)	35	22.2	17.6	9.91
298	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	33.3	14.3	12.4
301	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	29.4	13
302	NVIDIA GeForce GT 710	9.76	5.01
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >New World
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
322*	AMD Radeon 540X	26.1	10.7	9.24
345*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	18.1	7.96
381*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	19.7
391*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²	0ⁿ²
399	AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	30.8	13	11.8	10.1
416	NVIDIA GeForce MX130	12.5
420	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	17.6
423	NVIDIA GeForce 930MX	17.8
464	Intel Iris Graphics 550	14
538*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)	10.2
539*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 5	19.6
551	Intel UHD Graphics 620	9.22
624	AMD Radeon R5 M255	12.2
625*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	9.36	4.82
632	NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M	8.08
653	Intel HD Graphics 4600	6.56
673*	Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)	17
725	Intel HD Graphics 610	5.73

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.