Notebookcheck Logo

Counter-Strike 2 in review: laptop and desktop benchmarks

Quite traditional. Counter-Strike, one of the most famous and successful multiplayer shooters in PC history, gets a successor, the Counter-Strike 2. In this article, we review the system requirements for the 2023 version to see how demanding or lax they are.
Counter-Strike 2

Test systems

XMG Neo 17 E23 (RTX 4090)
XMG Neo 17 E23 (RTX 4090)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 (RTX 4080)
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 (RTX 4080)
XMG Pro 15 E23 (RTX 4070)
XMG Pro 15 E23 (RTX 4070)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 (RTX 4060)
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 (RTX 4060)
Medion Erazer Scout E20 (RTX 4050)
Medion Erazer Scout E20 (RTX 4050)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (RTX 3080 Ti)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (RTX 3080 Ti)
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 (RX 7600S & 780M)
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 (RX 7600S & 780M)
be quiet! Silent Base 802 (RTX 4080 & RX 7900 XT)
be quiet! Silent Base 802 (RTX 4080 & RX 7900 XT)

These devices are used for our gaming benchmarks. You may visit each company's website by clicking on the images. Additional details on the specifications can be found at the end of the article.

Technical review

Until now, Counter-Strike 2 has only partially benefited Valve. Recent Steam reviews have been mixed, which does not bode well for the game. Players express concerns about bugs and quality issues with various game aspects, alongside accusations that Valve replaced CS: GO unnecessarily. It comes as no surprise that a new patch is published virtually every day to address both small and large issues.

Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2

We encountered one or two issues during testing. For instance, the time demo function of the console, typically favored for benchmarks, consistently crashed (as of 09.11.23). As a result, we had to resort to manual measurements for this article. Fortunately, there were virtually no other technical difficulties. Counter-Strike 2 presents a commendable overall appearance concerning graphics demands, a topic we will delve into shortly. Beyond the stylish and detailed characters, the visual effects are noteworthy. Particularly, the visual impact of the smoke grenade fog is first-class and can make the gameplay that bit more exciting. The interplay of light and shadow is also commendable.

Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2

Reviews of the graphical options have been divided. While only the brightness, aspect ratio, resolution, picture mode, and frame rate can be changed in the video tab, the advanced menu offers almost 10 detailed settings that can be adjusted in one go using presets and do not require a restart. CS 2 only provides CMAA and MSAA for edge smoothing, which is somewhat disappointing and out of date.

Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2

With the exception of FSR and Nvidia Reflex Low Latency, the game generally lacks modern features. Notably, gamers have to forego DLSS. However, there are positive aspects, such as the practical preview image in the graphics menu, which even includes a zoom function. It currently occupies just over 30 GB on the hard disk, a relatively moderate amount.

Benchmark

As the benchmark functions of the in-game console were non-functional during the testing period, we opted for the CapFrameX tool to manually capture a sequence that replicated conditions as closely as possible. The Ancient map (practice match with bots) is shown in the video below since it has proven to be the most demanding in terms of visuals and performance, featuring elements like water and dense vegetation. The measurement entails an almost 15-second run on the terrorist side, interrupted by the throw of a smoke grenade. The frame rate in CS 2 can vary significantly depending on the map, the number of characters, and the weapon usage.

Results


FHD (1920 x 1080)

Compared to other shooters, CS 2 is relatively undemanding in terms of hardware, particularly at moderate resolutions and settings. For instance, on a Radeon 780M, users may play at 1920 x 1080 pixels with medium details and achieve over 60 FPS. With a reasonably up-to-date mid-range GPU, Full HD performance is generally smooth.

Counter-Strike 2
    1920x1080 Low Preset     1920x1080 Medium Preset     1920x1080 High Preset     1920x1080 Very High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
320 (89.7min, 129.2P0.1, 143.3P1) fps ∼100%
318 (53.9min, 120.6P0.1, 137.2P1) fps ∼100%
315 (56.7min, 104.2P0.1, 131.9P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
288 (96.3min, 108P0.1, 119.4P1) fps ∼90%
270 (93min, 111.8P0.1, 120.1P1) fps ∼85%
266 (87.6min, 105.2P0.1, 122P1) fps ∼84%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 17 E23
240 (45.7min, 53.7P0.1, 107.3P1) fps ∼75%
219 (12.3min, 52.6P0.1, 94.4P1) fps ∼69%
213 (20.6min, 50.1P0.1, 77.4P1) fps ∼68%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
215 (28.6min, 48.5P0.1, 96.1P1) fps ∼67%
207 (33.2min, 50.2P0.1, 95.4P1) fps ∼65%
184.6 (19.1min, 38.3P0.1, 85.1P1) fps ∼59%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
220 (36.3min, 58P0.1, 96.9P1) fps ∼69%
194.4 (31.4min, 48.8P0.1, 94.4P1) fps ∼61%
164 (28.1min, 41.7P0.1, 81.3P1) fps ∼52%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
182.9 (32.4min, 55P0.1, 83.9P1) fps ∼57%
170.7 (28.7min, 45.2P0.1, 81.2P1) fps ∼54%
141 (15min, 21P0.1, 48.6P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
194.6 (50min, 75.5P0.1, 85.7P1) fps ∼61%
162.3 (31.9min, 54.3P0.1, 81.2P1) fps ∼51%
139.1 (20.5min, 37.6P0.1, 66.1P1) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
204 (47.9min, 67.7P0.1, 91.5P1) fps ∼64%
142.6 (57.7min, 64.1P0.1, 73.7P1) fps ∼45%
110.2 (16.5min, 37.1P0.1, 60.8P1) fps ∼35%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
190.5 (76.2min, 87.4P0.1, 94.7P1) fps ∼60%
149.9 (72.1min, 82.3P0.1, 88P1) fps ∼47%
103.7 (66.4min, 70.7P0.1, 73.8P1) fps ∼33%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
102.4 (58.4min, 63P0.1, 66.8P1) fps ∼100%
67.4 (47.2min, 48.1P0.1, 51.1P1) fps ∼21%
34.7 (22min, 22.4P0.1, 24.7P1) fps ∼11%
21.9 (11.6min, 12P0.1, 15.3P1) fps ∼7%

QHD (2560 x 1440)

CS 2 is not extremely CPU-intensive even at the resolution of 2560 x 1440 and the Very High preset. A Radeon RX 7600S, for example, has the power to maintain 60 frames per second.

Counter-Strike 2
    2560x1440 Very High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
259 (63.6min, 101.7P0.1, 123.8P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
206 (85.1min, 98.5P0.1, 130.4P1) fps ∼80%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 17 E23
188.7 (33.3min, 37.2P0.1, 66.3P1) fps ∼73%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
148.5 (26.4min, 28.1P0.1, 51.5P1) fps ∼57%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
120.2 (31.7min, 37.4P0.1, 54.6P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
100.6 (17.1min, 18.5P0.1, 36.1P1) fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
98 (40.8min, 46.1P0.1, 54.3P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
79 (29.2min, 32P0.1, 38.8P1) fps ∼31%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
64.4 (45.9min, 45.9P0.1, 46.4P1) fps ∼25%

UHD (3840 x 2160)

CS 2 only demands a high-end GPU for 4K displays if maximum settings are desired. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, for instance, surpasses the 60 FPS mark in this scenario.

Counter-Strike 2
    3840x2160 Very High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
133 (52.4min, 69P0.1, 75P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Neo 17 E23
113.5 (28min, 30.6P0.1, 45.9P1) fps ∼85%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
100.7 (34.2min, 66.6P0.1, 71.6P1) fps ∼76%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23
89.7 (15.3min, 29.8P0.1, 37.9P1) fps ∼67%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX
66.7 (24min, 24P0.1, 32.2P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
XMG Pro 15 E23
55.4 (19.8min, 22.5P0.1, 26.9P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23
53.2 (22.8min, 27P0.1, 32P1) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H
Medion Erazer Scout E20
40.6 (17min, 18.2P0.1, 25.6P1) fps ∼31%
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16
34.7 (24.5min, 24.6P0.1, 25.4P1) fps ∼26%

Overview

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >Counter-Strike 2
 Counter-Strike 2 (2023)
low
1920x1080
Low Preset
med.
1920x1080
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
ultra
1920x1080
Very High Preset
QHD
2560x1440
Very High Preset
4K
3840x2160
Very High Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
351
340
339
340
312
202
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
355
348
341
337
267
133.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
351
344
341
336
274
152.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
320
318
315
259
133
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
288
270
266
206
100.7
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
351
339
337
299
236
116.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
240
226.5n2
201.35n2
172.65n2
113.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
342
342
328
268
218
110.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
215
207
184.6
148.5
89.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
331
322
283
202
110.1
AMD Radeon RX 6800
350
349
280
238
174.6
93
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
351
344
283
202
127.2
62
NVIDIA Titan RTX
353
342
289
251
157.1
89.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
350
337
292
240
159.5
94.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
220
194.4
164
120.2
66.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
171.55n2
161.1n2
131.25n2
94.25n2
55.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
330
288
225
166.9
86.2
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
353
346
257
183.8
125.8
65.2
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
349
347
250
162
126.4
64.8
PosModel< PrevNext >Counter-Strike 2
low med. high ultra QHD 4K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
225
213
186.5
127.6
105.6
60.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
344
330
267
180.7
145.5
72.8
Intel Arc A770
317
270
168.1
117
89.6
46.7
AMD Radeon RX 7600
348
336
219
138
89.6
44.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
194.6
162.3
139.1
98
53.2
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
346
342
208
154.3
108.3
54.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
241
230
193.8
149.5
105.9
63.3
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
348
316
192.8
132.2
84.3
39.3
Intel Arc A750
336
270
169.5
117.9
89
40.3
NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
337
291
228
181
110.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)
341
316
218
169.3
124.4
55.2
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)
347
308
205
149.3
105.2
55
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
190.5
149.9
103.7
64.4
34.7
Intel Arc A580
331
263
144.1
113.5
79.5
38.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)
320
285
202
148.8
99.2
46.2
AMD Radeon RX 6600
345
303
168.2
123.1
84.9
39.6
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)
344
307
171.2
136.5
86.6
49.2
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)
320
257
153.1
117.5
80.2
38.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)
285
243
136.1
102.5
67.2
32.8
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
281
194
94.5
69.2
35
13.9
PosModel< PrevNext >Counter-Strike 2
low med. high ultra QHD 4K
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)
254
195.5
108.6
87.5
55
26.6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
165.5n2
127.5n2
95.55n2
79
40.6
Intel Arc A730M
169
154.9
113.9
81.7
52.8
14.2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
146.7
132.6
104.4
98.2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)
271
223
132.5
81.2
62.3
31.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)
248
201
117.2
74.3
51.8
19.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
170.1
125.3n2
71.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
136.6
110
84.7
60.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
123.4
94.9
75.4
62
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
74
67.1
46.3
32.7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
130.6
113.2
79.5
55.4
Intel Arc A380
182.5
122.3
68
46.2
Intel Arc A310
153.5
106.3
37.5
27.7
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
111.1
84.5
52.1
31.8
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
90.2
57.9
37.6
24.7
AMD Radeon 780M
118.6n2
81.8n2
48.2n2
30n2
27
11.5
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
65.6
50
30.5
16.5
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
75.1
41
24.3
17.2
AMD Radeon 540X
17.1
16.8
9.58
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
32.1
27.7
12.8
PosModel< PrevNext >Counter-Strike 2
low med. high ultra QHD 4K
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
46.3
29
13.6
Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
11.3
6.38
5.29
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
52.5
34.3
17.7
11.5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
62.8
43.4
21.9
15.9
NVIDIA GeForce MX130
27.2
20.2
14.1
10.8
Intel Iris Graphics 550
15.6
13.4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
51.6
34.4
16.7
11.6
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
25.7
18.7
10.3
Intel UHD Graphics 630
27.3
19.3
8.56
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
23.4
16.7
9
Intel UHD Graphics 620
16.5
16.5
5.72
AMD Radeon R5 M255
26.3
13.8
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
29.3
22.4
10.5
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Test systems

Notebook Graphics card Processor Memory
XMG Neo 17 E23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13900HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X) Intel Core i9-13950HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i9-13900HX 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Medion Erazer Scout E20 Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-13700H 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i9-12900H 2 x 16 GB DDR5
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 AMD Radeon RX 7600S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 780M AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2 x 8 GB DDR5
Tower-PC Graphics card Processor Memory
Asus ROG Strix Z790-F Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-13900K 2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill
Operating system Nvidia driver AMD driver
Windows 11 ForceWare 546.01 Adrenalin 23.11.1
Read all 3 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Counter-Strike 2 in review: laptop and desktop benchmarks
Florian Glaser, 2023-11-11 (Update: 2023-11-14)