Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarNo RTX? No Problem — Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Base Model Laptop Review
When Razer refreshed its Blade 15 series earlier this year, fans had the option between RTX 2060, RTX 2070 Max-Q, or RTX 2080 Max-Q graphics. It wasn't until a few months later that Nvidia launched the less expensive mobile GTX 1660 Ti for gamers who wanted the benefits of Turing without the fancy RT or DLSS features.
The latest Blade 15 configuration comes equipped with the GTX 1660 Ti to lower the barrier of entry for users on tighter budgets. Whereas the least expensive SKU used to be the RTX 2060 configuration for $2000, the new GTX 1660 Ti configuration is $400 less while sporting the exact same ports, RAM, and CPU as its pricier RTX siblings. Its display, however, will use a slower 60 Hz panel with an option to upgrade to 144 Hz.
As explained here, Blade 15 laptops come in slightly different thicknesses depending on the SKU. The GTX 1660 Ti chassis is the "Base Model" instead of the "Advanced Model" meaning that it is the thicker version with a different set of features as we will detail below.
The 15.6-inch Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti competes directly against other mid-range to high-end ultrathin gaming laptops like the MSI GS65, Aorus 15, Asus Zephyrus S GX531, Lenovo Legion Y740-15, Alienware m15 R2, and the HP Omen X 2S 15. The Dell XPS 15 and Gigabyte Aero 15 can also be seen as alternatives since Razer wants to target content creators and professionals as well. We recommend checking out our existing review on the Blade 15 GTX 1060 Max-Q to learn more about the physical features of the Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti since they share the same chassis.
Related news: Razer Blade Pro 17 has the fastest GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q GPU
More Razer Blade reviews:
Case
All Blade 15 laptops thus far share the same footprint but with different thicknesses depending on the configuration. This particular SKU shares the same Base Model chassis as the Blade 15 RTX 2060 or Blade 15 GTX 1060 Max-Q instead of the thinner Advanced Model chassis of the Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q or Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q. The Base Model and Advanced Model designs are nearly identical save for some notable differences as listed here:
- Base Model includes single-zone RGB lighting only instead of per-key RGB
- Base Model is slightly thicker by 2.1 mm (17.8 mm vs. 19.9 mm)
- Base Model integrates gigabit RJ-45 and a 2.5-inch SATA III bay
- Base Model comes with a 200 W AC adapter instead of 230 W
- Battery capacity is smaller on the Base Model (65 Wh vs. 80 Wh)
- No IR camera for Base Model
- No vapor chamber cooler for Base Model
- 144 Hz IPS is optional for Base Model
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1.000 USD/Euros
Best Displays, for University Students
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤5-inch, Camera SmartphonesThe Best Smartphones for Less Than 160 Euros
Connectivity
The images below compare the thicker Base Model Blade 15 GTX 1060 Max-Q (bottom) to the thinner Advanced Model Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q (top). The Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti is exactly the same as the Blade 15 GTX 1060 Max-Q except that its AC adapter port has changed to match the one on the Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q. In other words, the Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti AC adapter is compatible across all Blade 15 Turing laptops while being incompatible with last generation Blade 15 Pascal laptops.
Communication
The Intel 9560 comes standard for theoretical transfer rates of up to 1.73 Gbps. Users can swap and upgrade to the Intel AX200 Wi-Fi 6 much like on our Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
Maintenance
Warranty
The standard one-year limited warranty applies with the option to extend to three years for an additional $250. This is pricier than what Dell, HP, or Lenovo offer for their gaming laptops likely because they benefit from larger economies of scale than Razer.
Display
We had anticipated the 144 Hz panel on our Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti to be the same 144 Hz LG Philips panel as found on our Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q, but this is not the case. Instead, the Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti shares the same BOE NV156FHM-N4K IPS panel as found on the Acer Predator Triton 500. Characteristics like contrast ratio, color coverage, brightness, and response times are therefore slightly different between the Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti and Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q. They're thankfully marginal and so most users won't even notice that Razer has swapped panel providers, but this is noteworthy nonetheless.
An interesting find is that a pulse-width modulation of 200 Hz is now present on all brightness levels up to 99 percent whereas this phenomenon is almost completely absent on the Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q and 2080 Max-Q SKUs. Users sensitive to onscreen flickering may want to avoid this GTX 1660 Ti SKU as a result.
Uneven backlight bleeding is present and just barely noticeable on our test unit. It's not enough to be distracting during regular use or video playback.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 312.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1158:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.57 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 2.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
91.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Samsung 156WR04, SDCA029, OLED, 15.60, 3840x2160 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 3936% | -20% | 3932% | 30% | 3889% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.6 (7.2, 6.4) | 12.8 (6.8, 6) 6% | 16.8 (9.2, 7.6) -24% | 16.4 (7.6, 6.8) -21% | 2.3 (1.1, 1.2) 83% | 15.2 (7.6, 7.6) -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10 (6, 4) | 10.4 (6, 4.4) -4% | 11.6 (7.2, 4.4) -16% | 8.8 (4.4, 4.4) 12% | 2.4 (1.1, 1.3) 76% | 11.2 (6.8, 4.4) -12% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 (99) | 23810 (10) 11805% | 23810 (24) 11805% | 59.52 (100) -70% | 23580 (24) 11690% | |
| Screen | 17% | 7% | -17% | 6% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 312.7 | 293 -6% | 314.7 1% | 324.2 4% | 421.2 35% | 266 -15% |
| Brightness | 305 | 270 -11% | 312 2% | 304 0% | 417 37% | 248 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 90 0% | 90 0% | 94 4% | 89 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.29 -7% | 0.38 -41% | 0.38 -41% | 0.31 -15% | |
| Contrast | 1158 | 1010 -13% | 828 -28% | 853 -26% | 858 -26% | |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.57 | 1.69 63% | 2.56 44% | 5.01 -10% | 6.06 -33% | 2.78 39% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 6.81 | 3.37 51% | 4.89 28% | 12.7 -86% | 11.89 -75% | 5.96 12% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 2.91 | 1.24 57% | 1.71 41% | 1.64 44% | 0.91 69% | |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.3 | 2.3 47% | 3.4 21% | 7.9 -84% | 2.8 35% | 3.58 17% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.3 96% | 2.3 96% | 2.35 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 7098 92% | 6758 96% | 6435 101% | 8455 77% | 6235 104% | 7186 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.4 | 63 6% | 60.7 2% | 60.8 2% | 81 36% | 62 4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.3 | 98.5 8% | 94.6 4% | 95.5 5% | 99.6 9% | 96 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1977% /
857% | -7% /
3% | 1958% /
829% | 18% /
12% | 1948% /
838% |
* ... smaller is better
Color space is actually slightly narrower than on both the Sharp and LG Philips panels of the Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q and Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q, respectively, at 91 percent sRGB. This has no major implications on the actual gaming experience of the laptop.
The panel is not as well calibrated as the displays of the pricier RTX options. Most notably, color temperature is slightly cooler than it should be at almost 7100K and so the average DeltaE values for grayscale and colors are impacted. Our calibration attempt addresses these shortcomings as shown by the Calman results below.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9676 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured. | |||
Outdoor visibility and viewing angles are similar to other Blade 15 IPS SKUs since maximum brightness and contrast ratios are not all that different between them. You'll want to stay under shade whenever possible or colors will become washed out.
Performance
Unlike Asus or MSI who tend to offer a very wide range of CPU options for the same chassis, Razer's approach is more streamlined. All current Blade 15 SKUs ship with the same Core i7-9750H CPU with no Core i5 or Core i9 alternatives. A Core i9 option could have potentially made it easier to reach very high frame rate targets, but the Core i7 is a more balanced option given the GTX 1660 Ti GPU.
Nvidia Optimus comes standard across all SKUs and so G-Sync has been omitted. LatencyMon shows no DPC latency issues even with wireless enabled.
Processor
We always say that just because two laptops share the same CPU, their performances may not be the same. In this case, the Core i7-9750H in the Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q is about 15 percent faster than the Core i7-9750H in our Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti according to CineBench R15 Multi-Thread. The pricier RTX 2080 Max-Q SKU is able to maintain its CPU lead over our GTX 1660 Ti SKU even after extended periods of stress.
Perhaps the more disappointing aspect is that the CPU in our test unit is 18 percent slower than the average Core i7-9750H in our database taken from 43 other laptops. While raw performance is still faster than the Core i5-8300H, i5-9300H or older i7-7700HQ, we know that the i7-9750H in the Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti is capable of much more based on what we've experienced on other laptops with this same processor.
Our scores below were recorded with Razer's Creator Mode active. Running on Gaming Mode results in even slower CPU performance as shown by these CineBench screenshots.
See our dedicated page on the Core i7-9750H for more technical information and benchmarks.
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82) | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Schenker Key 16 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85) | |
| Schenker Key 16 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (1.96 - 2.19, n=10) | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (11.3 - 14.1, n=10) | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13) | |
| Schenker Key 16 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13) | |
| Schenker Key 16 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG GA502DU | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
PCMark benchmarks are consistently below average when compared to other laptops equipped with the same i7-9750H CPU and GTX 1660 Ti GPU. We suspect that the poor CineBench results above have attributed to the lower PCMark numbers.
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4074 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5480 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5301 points | |
Help | ||
Storage Devices
All Blade 15 and Blade Pro 17 configurations thus far ship with Samsung SSDs in contrast to most other OEMs where it can be difficult to know what drive you're going to get. The Dell Alienware series, for example, ships with drives from Lite-On, Toshiba, SK Hynix, and Samsung.
As mentioned earlier, the Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti includes a secondary 2.5-inch SATA III bay that's missing on the thinner Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q and RTX 2080 Max-Q SKUs. This is especially useful for cost-conscious users because investing in a 2 TB HDD is far cheaper than a 2 TB M.2 SSD. The 1 TB Seagate HDD in our unit returns an average transfer rate of 101 MB/s which is excellent for a 5400 drive.
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 23% | 13% | 28% | 6% | -17% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1149.77 | 976.6 -15% | 1426.35 24% | 1823.85 59% | 1140.57 -1% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 513.29 | 496.53 -3% | 576.02 12% | 983.98 92% | 454.24 -12% | |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1539.06 | 2082.66 35% | 2073.16 35% | 3182.39 107% | 2085.95 36% | |
| Score Total | 3177 | 4221 33% | 3633 14% | 3638 15% | 2870 -10% | 2039 -36% |
| Score Write | 1450 | 2102 45% | 1481 2% | 1693 17% | 1141 -21% | 802 -45% |
| Score Read | 1152 | 1394 21% | 1407 22% | 1294 12% | 1186 3% | 815 -29% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.104 | 0.034 67% | 0.108 -4% | 0.039 62% | 0.065 37% | 0.045 57% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.063 | 0.05 21% | 0.065 -3% | 0.05 21% | 0.042 33% | 0.071 -13% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1212.2 | 1807.21 49% | 1135.27 -6% | 1456.13 20% | 921.88 -24% | 570.49 -53% |
| 4K-64 Read | 917.46 | 1159.06 26% | 1177.33 28% | 1077.98 17% | 875.61 -5% | 610.88 -33% |
| 4K Write | 105.96 | 108.34 2% | 108.86 3% | 98.3 -7% | 126.51 19% | 83.83 -21% |
| 4K Read | 51.32 | 52.08 1% | 37.2 -28% | 43.25 -16% | 59.11 15% | 43.09 -16% |
| Seq Write | 1315.15 | 1864.07 42% | 2371.22 80% | 1386.27 5% | 923.81 -30% | 1474.76 12% |
| Seq Read | 1828.99 | 1832.18 0% | 1924.95 5% | 1723.09 -6% | 2516.94 38% | 1612.2 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
GPU Performance
Unlike the under-performing CPU, the GTX 1660 Ti GPU is performing where we expect it to be at within 5 percent of the average mobile GTX 1660 Ti in our database. Users can expect 40 to 50 percent faster performance than the last generation Blade 14 GTX 1060 and 50 to 60 percent faster performance than the mobile GTX 1650. The desktop GTX 1660 Ti is still about 10 to 15 percent faster than our mobile variant.
Keep in mind that the mobile RTX 2060 is only about 10 percent faster than our GTX 1660 Ti. If you're not interested in any RTX specific features, then the Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti can offer higher performance-per-dollar than the Blade 15 RTX 2060. All current titles will run smoothly at 1080p60 with most settings on Medium or Medium-High.
Idling on Witcher 3 for one hour shows no recurring frame dips to suggest no interrupting background activity when gaming. There was a small dip to 38 FPS near the beginning of the test as shown by our graph below, but this never occurred a second time.
See our dedicated page on the mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 16594 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31563 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12926 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5406 points | |
Help | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (62 - 73, n=8) | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| HP Envy 13-ah0003ng | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB | |
| Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Coffee Lake Refresh | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (51.6 - 65.1, n=21) | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| HP Envy 13-ah0003ng | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 291.2 | 259.6 | 241.3 | 132.5 | fps |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 247.6 | 169.7 | 97.5 | 51.6 | fps |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 115 | 83 | 75 | 67 | fps |
Emissions
System Noise
The cooling solution consists of twin 40 to 45 mm fans and three large copper heat pipes. Fan noise is generally louder than on the RTX 2070 Max-Q or 2080 Max-Q SKUs due in part to the spinning HDD adding another layer of noise on top of the fans. When gaming on Creator mode, expect fan noise to settle in the 48 to 51 dB(A) range compared to "only" 45 dB(A) on the Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q.
Fan noise when gaming changes depending on the performance setting. When in Balanced mode, for example, fan noise will settle at 44 dB(A) for longer.
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth Thin 8RE-051US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | -11% | 3% | -11% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.5 | 28.3 1% | 28.3 1% | 28.2 1% | 30 -5% | 28.4 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.3 | 28.8 5% | 28.5 6% | 28.2 7% | 31 -2% | 28.4 6% |
| Idle Average * | 30.5 | 28.8 6% | 28.5 7% | 28.2 8% | 34 -11% | 28.4 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 29 5% | 49 -61% | 30.4 -0% | 39 -28% | 29.6 3% |
| Load Average * | 41 | 33.5 18% | 49 -20% | 43.8 -7% | 46 -12% | 43.5 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 45 6% | 49 -2% | 47.2 2% | 53 -10% | 45.7 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 51.9 | 45.2 13% | 55 -6% | 47.2 9% | 55 -6% | 45.7 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 30.3 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 41 / 51.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) | ||
Temperature
Put powerful components inside a thin metal chassis and high surface temperatures become inevitable. The palm rests and keyboard center could have been cooler as they can reach almost 40 C even without much onscreen activity.
When gaming, surface temperatures will be just as warm as on the pricier Blade 15 RTX laptops even though performance is slower. We're able to measure hot spots of 51 C to 53 C on the top and bottom sides of the laptop compared to 49 C on the Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q. The competing MSI GS65 9SG runs a bit cooler on average towards the center of the keyboard.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 39.9 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.6 °C / 103.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-10.8 °C / -19.5 F).
Stress Test
Core temperatures are generally warmer than on the Blae 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q as shown by our screenshots and table below. Interestingly, overall performance and clock rates for both the CPU and GPU are faster when on Creator mode than Gaming mode.
CPU clock rate stabilizes at just 2.8 GHz when running Prime95 compared to 3.1 GHz on the Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q. These results line up with our CineBench loop test observations above where the Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti performs slower despite having the same Core i7 processor.
Running on batteries will impact performance. A Fire Strike run on batteries returns Physics and Graphics scores of 10394 and 3561 points, respectively, compared to 14800 and 14753 points when on mains.
| CPU Clock (GHz) | GPU Clock (MHz) | Average CPU Temperature (°C) | Average GPU Temperature (°C) | |
| System Idle | -- | -- | 52 | 50 |
| Prime95 Stress (Gaming mode) | 2.3 | -- | 65 | -- |
| Prime95 Stress (Creator mode) | 2.8 | -- | 70 | -- |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress (Creator mode) | 3.2 - 3.3 | 1410 | 89 | 83 |
| Witcher 3 Stress (Gaming mode) | 4.0 | 1650 | 76 | 79 |
| Witcher 3 Stress (Creator mode) | 4.0 | 1710 | 82 | 80 |
Speakers
