Notebookcheck Logo

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 review - Compact gaming laptop with fast display

An even sharper razor. The new Razer Blade 15 comes with brand new 12th generation Intel processors and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti/3080 Ti. Together with a lightning-fast 360 Hz panel, this promises an incredibly smooth display. Find out how the small chassis copes with powerful hardware in the following review.

Packed with the latest Intel and Nvidia chips, the Razer Blade 15 2022 spring model promises iterative improvements for the popular 15-inch gaming laptop range. The main difference between the model reviewed here and the previously reviewed Blade 15 2022 is the 1080p 360 Hz panel, so readers can stick to this review for details on the largely identical physical specs. The Blade 15's direct competitors include other high-performance 15.6-inch gaming laptops such as the Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22, the Asus ROG Strix Scar 15, the MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS and the MSI Vector GP66 12UGS.

Further Razer reviews:

Blade 15 Profimodell Frühjahr 2022 (Blade 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12800H 14 x 1.8 - 4.8 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16384 MB, Core: 1125 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 511,69, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, Quad-channel DDR5-4800
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, glossy: no, 360 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset, Card Reader: SD card reader
Networking
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235 ( = 0.67 x 13.98 x 9.25 in)
Battery
80 Wh, 5209 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p webcam
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: IR camera
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Razer Synapse, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.09 kg ( = 73.72 oz / 4.61 pounds), Power Supply: 646 g ( = 22.79 oz / 1.42 pounds)
Price
4099 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.3 %
05/2022
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
89.1 %
03/2022
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440
03/2022
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg26.6 mm15.60"2560x1440
86.3 %
07/2021
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"2560x1440
84.5 %
02/2022
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg19.8 mm15.60"2560x1440
86.9 %
03/2022
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23.4 mm15.60"1920x1080

Case - Compact and suitable for travel

For the case, we again see the familiar, slick metal construction with which the Blade series originally made a name for itself. Stability, workmanship and torsion resistance thus remain excellent. The flipside is the high susceptibility to fingerprints.

The Razer Blade 15 is a very compact 15.6-inch laptop and is both smaller and thinner than most of its competitors. In particular, the ROG Strix Scar 15 and the XMG Neo 15 E22 are significantly thicker and around 100—200 g heavier than our 2.1 kg review device.

Size Comparison

360.2 mm / 14.2 inch 243.5 mm / 9.59 inch 26.6 mm / 1.047 inch 2.2 kg4.91 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 267 mm / 10.5 inch 23.4 mm / 0.921 inch 2.3 kg5.1 lbs354 mm / 13.9 inch 259 mm / 10.2 inch 27.2 mm / 1.071 inch 2.3 kg5.1 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 248 mm / 9.76 inch 19.8 mm / 0.78 inch 2.2 kg4.85 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 16.99 mm / 0.669 inch 2.1 kg4.61 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 16.99 mm / 0.669 inch 2.1 kg4.64 lbs

Hardware - Blade 15 with modern connectivity

There are no big surprises in terms of connectivity. Worth mentioning are the full-fledged SD card reader and the HDMI port, which supports version 2.1. Unlike many competitors such as the XMG Neo 15 E22, there is no dedicated LAN port here. But this can be rectified via a Thunderbolt dock if needed. 

Left: Power connector, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm audio connector
Left: Power connector, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm audio connector
Right: SD card reader, Thunderbolt, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.1, lock port
Right: SD card reader, Thunderbolt, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.1, lock port

SD Card Reader

The performance of the SD card reader is on a high level. In the sequential AS-SSD read test with our microSD AV PRO 128GB V60 card, an error occurred on our review device.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=95, last 2 years)
116.1 MB/s ∼70% -25%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
68.3 (65.41min - 69.52max) MB/s ∼41% -56%

Communication

The integrated Killer Wi-Fi 6E 1690i module offered very fast transfer rates when connected to our Asus GT-AXE11000 test router. Bluetooth 5.2 support is also provided.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1621 (1412min - 1672max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (851 - 1695, n=17, last 2 years)
1445 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1727 (866min - 1759max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (787 - 1748, n=21, last 2 years)
1584 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1569 (622min - 1690max) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (866-1759)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1412-1672)

Webcam


ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
16 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022: 12.53 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 18.39 ∆E

Maintenance

After removing six Torx screws (T5), one has access to both RAM modules, the battery, the WLAN module and (after removing an additional cover) the M.2 SSD.

Razer Blade 15 2022 - inner workings

Input devices - Large clickpad and tidy keyboard

Keyboard

The keyboard features RGB key lighting with 16 brightness levels (including "off") and half-height arrow up and arrow down keys, which allows Razer to place the entire keyboard in a rectangular area centered between the speaker openings. The keys offer a flat key travel and quiet, muffled typing sounds. Key resistance is moderate and the center of the keyboard hardly yields when typing.

Razer Blade 15 2022 - Input devices
Razer Blade 15 2022 - Backlighting

Touchpad

The touchpad comprises an area of around 13x8 cm and allows for excellent finger gliding. The clicks are characterized by a short key travel and clear haptic feedback.

Display - Fast panel with limited color spectrum

Subpixel
Subpixel

A matte, full HD IPS panel with a native resolution of 1920x1080 pixels and a refresh rate of 360 Hz is installed in our review device. Alternatively, a QHD 240 Hz and a 4K 144 Hz display are available, each of which should cover the DCI-P3 color space. The QHD model also supports Nvidia G-Sync and Advanced Optimus.

The brightness of 315 cd/m² on average is more than sufficient for most application scenarios and, together with a decent black value of 0.24, results in an above-average contrast of 1,375:1 in class comparison. The gray-to-gray response times are particularly short and we could not detect any PWM.

311
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
TL156VDXP02-0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 330 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 314.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 330 cd/m²
Contrast: 1375:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 0.63
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
67.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.282
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
BOE0A67 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.60
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
BOE NE156FHM-NZ3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
33%
31%
31%
10%
Display P3 Coverage
65.3
99.1
52%
97.6
49%
96.4
48%
70.1
7%
sRGB Coverage
85.1
99.9
17%
99.9
17%
99.7
17%
99.5
17%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.4
86.8
29%
85.3
27%
85.6
27%
72.1
7%
Response Times
-123%
-119%
-122%
-10%
-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9)
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-235%
14.4 ?(6.6, 7.8)
-235%
14 ?(7.2, 6.8)
-226%
6 ?(3.2, 2.8)
-40%
5.8 ?(3.4, 2.4)
-35%
Response Time Black / White *
10.5 ?(5.7, 4.8)
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-10%
10.8 ?(5.4, 5.4)
-3%
12.4 ?(7.2, 5.2)
-18%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
20%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
9%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-54%
-38%
-77%
-87%
-45%
Brightness middle
330
286
-13%
295
-11%
304.3
-8%
272
-18%
353.1
7%
Brightness
315
271
-14%
277
-12%
286
-9%
253
-20%
325
3%
Brightness Distribution
89
89
0%
62
-30%
76
-15%
87
-2%
85
-4%
Black Level *
0.24
0.25
-4%
0.28
-17%
0.33
-38%
0.25
-4%
0.38
-58%
Contrast
1375
1144
-17%
1054
-23%
922
-33%
1088
-21%
929
-32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.47
2.74
-86%
2.36
-61%
2.76
-88%
3.73
-154%
2.24
-52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.73
5.21
-91%
4.24
-55%
5.57
-104%
9.43
-245%
5
-83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.63
2.52
-300%
2.38
-278%
0.98
-56%
1.02
-62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
1.1
39%
3.43
-91%
4
-122%
6.5
-261%
4
-122%
Gamma
2.282 96%
2.2 100%
2.44 90%
2.14 103%
2.172 101%
2.24 98%
CCT
6499 100%
6408 101%
6266 104%
6844 95%
6485 100%
6864 95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-48% / -45%
-79% / -54%
-56% / -60%
-22% / -51%
-16% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

In our configuration, the Razer Blade 15 only covers 85% of the sRGB color space. Considering the manufacturer's claim of "up to 100%", we expected more here.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

Upon delivery, the DeltaE color space deviations of the grayscales and colors are already in the ideal range (less than 3) and can be improved to a solid 0.63 and 0.8 respectively by subsequent calibration.

Razer Blade 15 vs sRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs sRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs AdobeRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs AdobeRGB
Razer Blade 15 vs P3
Razer Blade 15 vs P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.7 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 1.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21751 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Thanks to a brightness of over 300 cd/m², the display is also equipped for outdoor use as long as you stay in the shade.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Viewing angles are superb. Even at steep angles, the colors and contrasts of the IPS display are hardly distorted.

Performance - Razer gaming laptop with top hardware

Our Razer Blade 15 is equipped with an Intel Core i7-12800H and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. There is also 32 GB of DDR5 RAM in quad-channel mode and a 1 TB PCIe 4.0 SSD. In combination with the 4K panel, the laptop is alternatively available with the Core i9-12900H.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z - Mainboard
CPU-Z - Memory
CPU-Z - SPD
GPU-Z - Intel
GPU-Z - Nvidia
HWiNFO
 

Test Conditions

In order to gain new insights during testing, we performed all measurements with the Synapse "Balanced" profile. This makes the GPU work with a maximum TGP of around 95 W and also limits the CPU. You can find the maximum achievable scores in our other review.

Processor

The Intel Core i7-12800H is a brand new 12th generation Intel processor with DDR5 RAM support. DDR5 functionality allows the two RAM modules to operate in quad-channel mode.

The Razer Blade 15 is less able to keep up with competitors in terms of CPU performance in "Balanced" mode than without performance limitations. Even the nominally weaker Core i7-12700H in the XMG Neo 15 E22 beats our review device in both scenarios in the Cinebench R15 multi-loop test. The fact that some single-thread benchmarks turn out better is probably due to the fact that the temperature limits are reached before the TDP limits. The turbo boost only remains active for a short time.

The Cinebench R15 multi-thread test delivers the same score in battery mode under the profile we selected.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2766 (2740.48-2824.46)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2175 (2157.5-2197.2)
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2624 (2577.65-2843.74)
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2372 (2349.62-2449.33)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
82.5 pt ∼83%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
80.9 pt ∼81%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
80.9 pt ∼81%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
72.4 pt ∼72%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
 
71 pt ∼71%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS -2!
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
62.8 pt ∼63%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61.5 pt ∼62%
Average of class Gaming
 
57.4 pt ∼57%
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
18452 Points ∼100% +89%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
17940 Points ∼97% +83%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
16812 (15129.6min - 16812.1max) Points ∼91% +72%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points ∼81% +52%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (9777 - 15386, n=4)
13835 Points ∼75% +42%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13519 (13222.6min - 13519.5max) Points ∼73% +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 23364, n=176, last 2 years)
12475 Points ∼68% +28%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9777 Points ∼53%
Single Core
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1887 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1796 - 1839, n=4)
1816 Points ∼96% +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1803 Points ∼96% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1799 Points ∼95%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points ∼95% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1920, n=175, last 2 years)
1496 Points ∼79% -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1469 Points ∼78% -18%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
6988 Points ∼100% +87%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
6651 Points ∼95% +78%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
6594 Points ∼94% +76%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points ∼82% +53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5214 Points ∼75% +39%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (3741 - 5928, n=4)
5196 Points ∼74% +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 8857, n=231, last 2 years)
4465 Points ∼64% +19%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
3741 Points ∼54%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
730 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (690 - 708, n=4)
700 Points ∼96% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points ∼95% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
695 Points ∼95%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
693 Points ∼95% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points ∼95% -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
574 Points ∼79% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 742, n=231, last 2 years)
556 Points ∼76% -20%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
2844 (2577.65min - 2843.74max) Points ∼100% +82%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2824 (2740.48min - 2824.46max) Points ∼99% +80%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
2449 (2349.62min - 2449.33max) Points ∼86% +56%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2197 (2157.5min - 2197.2max) Points ∼77% +40%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points ∼77% +39%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1566 - 2697, n=4)
2166 Points ∼76% +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3562, n=240, last 2 years)
1880 Points ∼66% +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1566 (1448.91min - 1565.5max) Points ∼55%
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
273 Points ∼100% +13%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points ∼96% +8%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
260 Points ∼95% +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points ∼95% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (242 - 266, n=4)
258 Points ∼95% +7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
242 Points ∼89%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
234 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 280, n=230, last 2 years)
222 Points ∼81% -8%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
306 Seconds * ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (146.4 - 1259, n=231, last 2 years)
293 Seconds * ∼96% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (220 - 306, n=4)
244 Seconds * ∼80% +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Seconds * ∼78% +22%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * ∼74% +26%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
197 Seconds * ∼64% +36%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
187 Seconds * ∼61% +39%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
177 Seconds * ∼58% +42%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
73067 MIPS ∼100% +64%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
69454 MIPS ∼95% +56%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
66678 MIPS ∼91% +50%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS ∼85% +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
61422 MIPS ∼84% +38%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (44553 - 62231, n=4)
57705 MIPS ∼79% +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 88128, n=230, last 2 years)
50313 MIPS ∼69% +13%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
44553 MIPS ∼61%
7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
6071 MIPS ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5892 MIPS ∼97%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
5804 MIPS ∼96% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (5726 - 5892, n=4)
5800 MIPS ∼96% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5775 MIPS ∼95% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS ∼94% -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=230, last 2 years)
5422 MIPS ∼89% -8%
Geekbench 5.4
Multi-Core
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
13745 Points ∼100% +43%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
13033 Points ∼95% +36%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points ∼90% +29%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
12382 Points ∼90% +29%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (9607 - 12797, n=4)
11712 Points ∼85% +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9607 Points ∼70%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 16925, n=223, last 2 years)
8535 Points ∼62% -11%
Single-Core
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1883 Points ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1842 Points ∼98%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1784 Points ∼95% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (1739 - 1842, n=4)
1778 Points ∼94% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points ∼93% -5%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1718 Points ∼91% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1949, n=223, last 2 years)
1456 Points ∼77% -21%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.9 fps ∼100% +79%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.8 fps ∼95% +69%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
19.6 fps ∼94% +68%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps ∼82% +47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.6 fps ∼75% +33%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (11.7 - 17.2, n=4)
15.5 fps ∼74% +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 26.6, n=232, last 2 years)
14 fps ∼67% +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
11.7 fps ∼56%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 332, n=227, last 2 years)
53.1 s * ∼100% -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.3 s * ∼98% -22%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * ∼97% -20%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (41.3 - 51.5, n=4)
45.5 s * ∼86% -6%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.9 s * ∼81% -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
42.9 s * ∼81%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
40.3 s * ∼76% +6%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
40.3 s * ∼76% +6%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=228, last 2 years)
0.563 sec * ∼100% -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4908 sec * ∼87% -9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * ∼84% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (0.4522 - 0.4715, n=4)
0.4593 sec * ∼82% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4553 sec * ∼81% -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4522 sec * ∼80%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.448 sec * ∼80% +1%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4218 sec * ∼75% +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1566 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
198 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
242 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93.1 pt ∼93%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
73.6 pt ∼74%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
73.5 pt ∼74%
Average of class Gaming
 
69.7 pt ∼70%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
69.2 pt ∼69%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63.6 pt ∼64%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
 
60.9 pt ∼61%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53.5 pt ∼54%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
15150 KRay/s ∼100% +159%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 21809, n=185, last 2 years)
11413 KRay/s ∼75% +95%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9537 KRay/s ∼63% +63%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9023 KRay/s ∼60% +55%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8506 KRay/s ∼56% +46%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s ∼51% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (5839 - 7694, n=4)
7165 KRay/s ∼47% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5839 KRay/s ∼39%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
100744 Points ∼100% +262%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=185, last 2 years)
61807 Points ∼61% +122%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41732 Points ∼41% +50%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
41116 Points ∼41% +48%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
38603 Points ∼38% +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points ∼36% +32%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (27801 - 37471, n=4)
34542 Points ∼34% +24%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
27801 Points ∼28%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3412 MB/s ∼100% +69%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3343 MB/s ∼98% +66%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3192 MB/s ∼94% +59%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3031 MB/s ∼89% +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 5123, n=185, last 2 years)
2875 MB/s ∼84% +43%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s ∼79% +33%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (2013 - 2693, n=4)
2515 MB/s ∼74% +25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2013 MB/s ∼59%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106194 Points ∼100% +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
102329 Points ∼96% +19%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97910 Points ∼92% +14%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
97871 Points ∼92% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (85965 - 101957, n=4)
93912 Points ∼88% +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points ∼88% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 132615, n=185, last 2 years)
89494 Points ∼84% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85965 Points ∼81%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
12610 Points ∼100% +79%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9928 Points ∼79% +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=185, last 2 years)
9925 Points ∼79% +41%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9899 Points ∼79% +41%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9756 Points ∼77% +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points ∼73% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (7027 - 9271, n=4)
8635 Points ∼68% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7027 Points ∼56%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
55702 Points ∼100% +253%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=185, last 2 years)
33641 Points ∼60% +113%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
26824 Points ∼48% +70%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
24769 Points ∼44% +57%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
23055 Points ∼41% +46%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points ∼38% +35%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (15765 - 21600, n=4)
20022 Points ∼36% +27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
15765 Points ∼28%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
132655 MB/s ∼100% +101%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99638 MB/s ∼75% +51%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96687 MB/s ∼73% +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 183146, n=185, last 2 years)
78670 MB/s ∼59% +19%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67282 MB/s ∼51% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65871 MB/s ∼50%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (55371 - 65871, n=4)
58347 MB/s ∼44% -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s ∼42% -15%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1156 MB/s ∼100% +65%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1081 MB/s ∼94% +54%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1069 MB/s ∼92% +52%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s ∼80% +32%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (701 - 1034, n=4)
896 MB/s ∼78% +28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
841 MB/s ∼73% +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
701 MB/s ∼61%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1393, n=206, last 2 years)
701 MB/s ∼61% 0%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
8644 KRay/s ∼100% +165%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 11862, n=185, last 2 years)
6194 KRay/s ∼72% +90%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5597 KRay/s ∼65% +72%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
5237 KRay/s ∼61% +61%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4883 KRay/s ∼56% +50%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s ∼48% +28%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (3257 - 4287, n=4)
3991 KRay/s ∼46% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3257 KRay/s ∼38%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40524 MPixel/s ∼99% +2%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39921 MPixel/s ∼97% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39666 MPixel/s ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (31329 - 40992, n=4)
38220 MPixel/s ∼93% -4%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
27416 MPixel/s ∼67% -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
25533 MPixel/s ∼62% -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 47710, n=185, last 2 years)
24955 MPixel/s ∼61% -37%

System Performance

System performance is solid, according to the PCMark 10 tests. In everyday use, operating speed is smooth and there are no noticeable delays, which is why you can use "Balanced" mode free of worry.

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
8004 Points ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points ∼96% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7313 - 7744, n=3)
7588 Points ∼95% +4%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7582 Points ∼95% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7313 Points ∼91%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
7240 Points ∼90% -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
7201 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8186, n=190, last 2 years)
6562 Points ∼82% -10%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
10943 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10847 Points ∼99% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10597 - 10814, n=3)
10706 Points ∼98% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10597 Points ∼97%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10218 Points ∼93% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
10070 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=189, last 2 years)
9863 Points ∼90% -7%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
10141 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10066 Points ∼99% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9675 Points ∼95%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9470 - 9675, n=3)
9575 Points ∼94% -1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9495 Points ∼94% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
8944 Points ∼88% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10638, n=189, last 2 years)
8761 Points ∼86% -9%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
12541 Points ∼100% +21%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points ∼97% +17%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10351 - 12306, n=3)
11587 Points ∼92% +12%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
11488 Points ∼92% +11%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
11434 Points ∼91% +10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10351 Points ∼83%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
9852 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13098, n=189, last 2 years)
8994 Points ∼72% -13%
CrossMark / Overall
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1768 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1768 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2169, n=34, last 2 years)
1761 Points ∼100% 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1719 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1719 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=34, last 2 years)
1708 Points ∼99% -1%
CrossMark / Creativity
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1868 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1868 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2328, n=34, last 2 years)
1846 Points ∼99% -1%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=34, last 2 years)
1691 Points ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1633 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
1633 Points ∼97% 0%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
6657 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
7009 points
PCMark 10 Score
7313 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65103 MB/s ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s ∼96% +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61994 MB/s ∼95% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61946 MB/s ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (48643 - 62522, n=4)
58859 MB/s ∼90% -5%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
45395 MB/s ∼70% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=185, last 2 years)
43642 MB/s ∼67% -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
43318 MB/s ∼67% -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66265 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s ∼99% +1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65341 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65277 MB/s ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (56629 - 66199, n=4)
63510 MB/s ∼96% -3%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49035 MB/s ∼74% -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=185, last 2 years)
47383 MB/s ∼72% -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
45841 MB/s ∼69% -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66256 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65772 MB/s ∼99%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65495 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (50923 - 66074, n=4)
62190 MB/s ∼94% -5%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
46932 MB/s ∼71% -29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46062 MB/s ∼70% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 68782, n=185, last 2 years)
45475 MB/s ∼69% -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95.2 ns * ∼100%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 ns * ∼99% +1%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.6 ns * ∼95% +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
85.3 ns * ∼90% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (83.9 - 122, n=208, last 2 years)
60.8 ns * ∼64% +36%
Average Intel Core i7-12800H
  (95.2 - 95.2, n=4)
23.8 (95.2min - 95.2max) ns * ∼25% +75%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies

According to LatencyMon, DPC latencies may be too high for real-time audio and video editing in the configuration we tested.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4836 μs * ∼100%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
3882 μs * ∼80% +20%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2156 μs * ∼45% +55%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1380 μs * ∼29% +71%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * ∼28% +72%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
808 μs * ∼17% +83%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

A 1TB Samsung PM9A1 M.2 SDD with PCIe 4.0 is installed in our review device, which results in very high data transfer rates. Since the PCIe 4.0 SSD "CA6-8D1024" from SSSTC was installed in our first Blade 15 review device, the drive models and transfer rates may differ.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7096.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5251.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 863.75 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 631.75 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4212.51 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3980.96 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 92.87 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 242.96 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
87.1 pt ∼87%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS -8!
WDC PC SN810 1TB
87.1 pt ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
84.6 pt ∼85%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
83.6 pt ∼84%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
72 pt ∼72%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
68.1 pt ∼68%
Average of class Gaming
 
56.2 pt ∼56%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
24.8 pt ∼25%
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s ∼100% +4%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2514 - 5544, n=25)
3964 MB/s ∼96% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3946 (3883.92min - 3946.42max) MB/s ∼96%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
3225 (3206.01min - 3225.21max) MB/s ∼78% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (170 - 5544, n=186, last 2 years)
2398 MB/s ∼58% -39%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2119 (2058.22min - 2119.13max) MB/s ∼51% -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1160 (560.08min - 1160.14max) MB/s ∼28% -71%
seq write
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s ∼100% +7%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2436 - 7667, n=25)
3919 MB/s ∼94% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3899 (3880.57min - 3898.61max) MB/s ∼94%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3405 (3386.69min - 3404.63max) MB/s ∼82% -13%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2661 (2641.11min - 2661max) MB/s ∼64% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (174 - 7889, n=185, last 2 years)
2605 MB/s ∼63% -33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1156 (590.64min - 1155.74max) MB/s ∼28% -70%
seq q8 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6666 (5850.89min - 6666.43max) MB/s ∼96%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 12143, n=25)
6588 MB/s ∼95% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
4536 (4257.18min - 4536.14max) MB/s ∼66% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 13195, n=186, last 2 years)
3965 MB/s ∼57% -41%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3563 (3099.47min - 3563.48max) MB/s ∼51% -47%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1741 (791.56min - 1740.72max) MB/s ∼25% -74%
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2877 - 10203, n=25)
5012 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4939 (4931.24min - 4938.77max) MB/s ∼99%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s ∼95% -4%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3448 (3378.51min - 3448.14max) MB/s ∼69% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 10203, n=186, last 2 years)
3144 MB/s ∼63% -36%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2665 (2644.09min - 2664.64max) MB/s ∼53% -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1185 (657.19min - 1184.83max) MB/s ∼24% -76%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
90.6 (86.51min - 90.63max) MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
89.7 (89.47min - 89.72max) MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (55.7 - 97.4, n=25)
81.5 MB/s ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s ∼88% -12%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
69.5 (66.71min - 69.49max) MB/s ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.53 - 97.4, n=186, last 2 years)
56.7 MB/s ∼63% -37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
23.3 (23.23min - 23.32max) MB/s ∼26% -74%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
408 (406.25min - 408.46max) MB/s ∼100% +62%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s ∼63% +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
252 (240.11min - 252.24max) MB/s ∼62%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
223 (222.49min - 223.25max) MB/s ∼55% -12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (149.4 - 275, n=25)
215 MB/s ∼53% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.79 - 421, n=185, last 2 years)
172.7 MB/s ∼42% -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
138 (137.2min - 137.78max) MB/s ∼34% -45%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3493 (3465.14min - 3493.06max) MB/s ∼100%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (920 - 4185, n=25)
3296 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3184 (3180.75min - 3183.86max) MB/s ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2272 (2266.88min - 2271.97max) MB/s ∼65% -35%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
1844 (1840.41min - 1844.18max) MB/s ∼53% -47%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.1 - 4198, n=185, last 2 years)
1813 MB/s ∼52% -48%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439 (211.56min - 439max) MB/s ∼13% -87%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
3354 (3320.28min - 3353.86max) MB/s ∼100% +27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2645 (2612.9min - 2645.36max) MB/s ∼79%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2613 (2594.87min - 2613.35max) MB/s ∼78% -1%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (373 - 3559, n=25)
2527 MB/s ∼75% -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2141 (2137.08min - 2141.26max) MB/s ∼64% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.15 - 4249, n=185, last 2 years)
1786 MB/s ∼53% -32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
618 (524.5min - 618max) MB/s ∼18% -77%
AS SSD
Score Total
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
8556 Points ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8103 Points ∼95%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (4873 - 9147, n=24)
7736 Points ∼90% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7659 Points ∼90% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
6267 Points ∼73% -23%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
6130 Points ∼72% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (910 - 9279, n=177, last 2 years)
5288 Points ∼62% -35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1814 Points ∼21% -78%
Score Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3482 Points ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3431 Points ∼99% +12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3054 Points ∼88%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1688 - 3469, n=24)
2904 Points ∼83% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2462 Points ∼71% -19%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
 
2008 Points ∼58% -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (389 - 3587, n=177, last 2 years)
1971 Points ∼57% -35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
637 Points ∼18% -79%
Score Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR