Notebookcheck

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 Laptop Review: How does it Compare to the RTX 2080 Max-Q?

Razor-sharp looks. The Blade Pro 17 has the fastest GeForce RTX 2060 we've tested thus far to be just 25 percent slower than the RTX 2080 Max-Q. Perhaps not coincidentally, it also costs about 25 percent less than the Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q SKU.

Razer refreshed its 17.3-inch Blade Pro series earlier this year to succeed the previous generation Blade Pro 2017. The 2019 Blade Pro 17 is a complete inside-out makeover as detailed in our existing review for the Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q. For this review, we'll be taking a look at a second configuration of the Blade Pro 17 with RTX 2060 graphics instead to see how it compares to the RTX 2080 Max-Q SKU in terms of performance, battery life, power consumption, noise, and temperature.

We recommend checking out the Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q to learn more about the chassis, ports, keyboard, display, and other physical properties since the Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 is identical in hardware.

Razer offers the Blade Pro 17 with RTX 2060, RTX 2070 Max-Q, and RTX 2080 Max-Q graphics with a fixed Core i7-9750H CPU and 1080p144 display. The series competes directly with other ultra-thin 17.3-inch gaming notebooks including the Lenovo Legion Y740, Asus Zephyrus S GX701, MSI GS75, Acer Predator Triton, and even the new Gigabyte Aero 17 to a degree.

More Razer reviews:

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 (Blade Pro Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 1060 MHz, Memory: 1850 MHz, GDDR6, 431.6, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Display
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, AUO409D, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
Soundcard
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
5 USB 2.0, 5 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 5 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD reader (UHS-III)
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 395 x 260 ( = 0.78 x 15.55 x 10.24 in)
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Razer stickers, Razer Synapse, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.75 kg ( = 97 oz / 6.06 pounds), Power Supply: 790 g ( = 27.87 oz / 1.74 pounds)
Price
2500 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case

428 mm / 16.9 inch 298 mm / 11.7 inch 38.7 mm / 1.524 inch 4 kg8.82 lbs424 mm / 16.7 inch 281 mm / 11.1 inch 22.5 mm / 0.886 inch 3.6 kg7.94 lbs399 mm / 15.7 inch 292 mm / 11.5 inch 26.2 mm / 1.031 inch 2.9 kg6.3 lbs399 mm / 15.7 inch 272 mm / 10.7 inch 19 mm / 0.748 inch 2.6 kg5.81 lbs395 mm / 15.6 inch 260 mm / 10.2 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.8 kg6.06 lbs396 mm / 15.6 inch 259 mm / 10.2 inch 18.9 mm / 0.744 inch 2.3 kg5.03 lbs
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader UHS-III, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.0b, Kensington Lock
Right: SD reader UHS-III, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.0b, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm combo audio

SD Card Reader

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
187.2 MB/s ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
50 MB/s ∼27% -73%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
206.7 MB/s ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
52 MB/s ∼25% -75%

Communication

Removable M.2 WLAN module sits adjacent to the M.2 SSD slot
Removable M.2 WLAN module sits adjacent to the M.2 SSD slot
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
682 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
678 MBit/s ∼99%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
578 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
668 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s ∼97% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
646 MBit/s ∼97%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
620 MBit/s ∼93% -4%

Maintenance

One of the only laptops with vapor chamber cooling for the GeForce RTX 2060. It's overkill at its best
One of the only laptops with vapor chamber cooling for the GeForce RTX 2060. It's overkill at its best

Input Devices

No more volume wheel, dedicated macro keys, or gimmicks of older Black Pro designs
No more volume wheel, dedicated macro keys, or gimmicks of older Black Pro designs
Large clickpad is great for cursor control, but subpar for clicking
Large clickpad is great for cursor control, but subpar for clicking
Keys are shallower and softer than we would like for a gaming laptop
Keys are shallower and softer than we would like for a gaming laptop
Full-size Arrow keys with no integrated NumPad
Full-size Arrow keys with no integrated NumPad

Display

All current SKUs of the Blade Pro 17 come with the same 1080p 144 Hz AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 IPS panel for the same visual experience between even the lowest-end and highest-end configurations. Our measurements for contrast, colors, brightness, and response times show similar results to our Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q as we expected.

Interestingly, grayscale and color accuracy are slightly better this time around, but the differences are still minor in the grand scheme of things. Razer calibrates the display of each unit at factory much like on the Gigabyte Aero 15 series and so our attempts to calibrate the display even further result in no real gains.

Note that this very same AUO panel can also be found on a number of other high-end 17.3-inch gaming laptops like the Asus Zephyrus S GX701.

Matte display with no edge-to-edge glass option
Matte display with no edge-to-edge glass option
Bezel "chin" is much narrower than on the Alienware m17 or Asus Strix G GL731
Bezel "chin" is much narrower than on the Alienware m17 or Asus Strix G GL731
Minor uneven backlight bleeding along the corners
Minor uneven backlight bleeding along the corners
Subpixel array is ever-so-slightly grainy
Subpixel array is ever-so-slightly grainy
293.6
cd/m²
293.4
cd/m²
289.8
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
300.4
cd/m²
288.1
cd/m²
286.4
cd/m²
284.2
cd/m²
285.5
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 300.4 cd/m² Average: 289 cd/m² Minimum: 14.49 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 300.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 939:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.32 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 2.95
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
AU Optronics AUO409D, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3, 3840x2160
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
B173ZAN01.0, IPS LED, 17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
-8%
-10%
-19%
-565%
-303%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6.8 (3.6, 3.2)
7.2 (3.6, 3.6)
-6%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
-6%
7.2 (3.6, 3.6)
-6%
60.8 (28.8, 32)
-794%
36 (18, 18)
-429%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
-9%
10 (5.2, 4.8)
-14%
11.6 (6.4, 5.2)
-32%
38.4 (22, 16.4)
-336%
24.4 (14, 10.4)
-177%
PWM Frequency
25510 (17)
204.9 (20)
Screen
7%
17%
-34%
-45%
-15%
Brightness middle
300.4
288
-4%
366
22%
297.4
-1%
230
-23%
366
22%
Brightness
289
287
-1%
343
19%
306
6%
207
-28%
349
21%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
91
-2%
80
-14%
83
-11%
86
-8%
Black Level *
0.32
0.2
37%
0.29
9%
0.31
3%
0.2
37%
0.46
-44%
Contrast
939
1440
53%
1262
34%
959
2%
1150
22%
796
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.32
2.33
-0%
1.51
35%
4.08
-76%
5.62
-142%
2.9
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.81
5.34
-40%
3.22
15%
6.88
-81%
10.24
-169%
5.4
-42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.95
2.47
16%
0.71
76%
4
-36%
3.1
-5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.19
21%
1.93
-29%
4
-167%
4.54
-203%
3.5
-133%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.41 91%
2.38 92%
2.259 97%
2.36 93%
2.37 93%
CCT
6764 96%
6710 97%
6881 94%
7205 90%
6625 98%
6616 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57.4
57
-1%
60
5%
56
-2%
88
53%
88.1
53%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
88
-1%
94
6%
86
-3%
100
12%
100
12%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / 5%
4% / 13%
-27% / -31%
-305% / -132%
-159% / -59%

* ... smaller is better

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 3.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9370 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Outdoors on a cloudy day
Wide IPS viewing angles
Wide IPS viewing angles

Performance

LatencyMon
LatencyMon

Razer doesn't like to offer "mid-range" gaming laptops as shown by the configuration options available for the Blade Pro 17. All Blade Pro 17 SKUs come with Core i7 CPUs and RTX graphics with a baseline 144 Hz panel as standard. The model utilizes Max-Q graphics where available as opposed to the full-power "Max-P" RTX 2070 or RTX 2080. This is definitely the right move since the last generation Blade Pro 2017 model had to underclock the full-power GTX 1080.

Nvidia Optimus comes standard meaning G-Sync is unavailable. LatencyMon shows no DPC issues with real-time audio recording even when wireless is enabled.

 

Processor

The Core i7-9750H CPU is a common find on gaming laptops and so we're already quite familiar with its performance. CineBench Multi-Thread benchmarks reveal it to be about 50 percent faster than the unlocked Core i7-7820HK on the last generation Blade Pro 2017. Results are essentially identical to the Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q even in terms of throttling behavior. CPU performance drops by about 10 percent when running CineBench R15 in a loop as maximum Turbo Boost is unsustainable as shown by our graph below.

See our dedicated page on the Core i7-9750H for more technical details and benchmark comparisons.

CineBench R15
CineBench R15
CineBench R20
CineBench R20
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190Tooltip
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1066 (1058.57-1172.68)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1076 (1067.18-1187.86)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points ∼93% +12%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼87% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=49)
183 Points ∼84% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H
181 Points ∼83%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points ∼83% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼78% -6%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points ∼77% -7%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
158 Points ∼72% -13%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
142 Points ∼65% -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼39% +48%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points ∼33% +26%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
1192 Points ∼27% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (964 - 1306, n=51)
1187 Points ∼27% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1180 Points ∼27% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H
1159 Points ∼26%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
850 Points ∼19% -27%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
771 Points ∼18% -33%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
710 Points ∼16% -39%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points ∼86% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=6)
2.07 Points ∼85% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H
2.02 Points ∼83%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points ∼74% -10%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.61 Points ∼66% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points ∼43% +49%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=6)
13.1 Points ∼30% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H
12.74 Points ∼29%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.39 Points ∼19% -34%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.13 Points ∼16% -44%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
7682 Points ∼71%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (6659 - 7214, n=9)
6919 Points ∼64%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
6421 Points ∼59%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5426 Points ∼50%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
42677 Points ∼65%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points ∼65%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (29665 - 36304, n=9)
34247 Points ∼52%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
25656 Points ∼39%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
19801 Points ∼30%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
247 s * ∼3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.733 s * ∼1%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (0.3 - 11365, n=38)
2393 Seconds * ∼11%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
638.9 Seconds * ∼3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
476.493 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.02 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.74 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
75.76 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
181 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1159 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
107.65 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help

System Performance

PCMark results are nearly identical to the Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q since both of our tested SKUs share the same Samsung SSD, RAM, and processor.

We experienced a strange CPU performance hiccup on our particular test unit. When waking from sleep, CPU Turbo Boost performance would sometimes be limited and not perform as fast as it should be even when set to High performance mode. Secondly, the Synapse software would have trouble loading at times when waking from sleep. A soft reboot fixes both issues.

PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10982 Points ∼92% +60%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7219 Points ∼60% +5%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7219 Points ∼60% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (6641 - 8069, n=9)
7119 Points ∼59% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6860 Points ∼57%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
4765 Points ∼40% -31%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3975 Points ∼33% -42%
Productivity
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
8256 Points ∼85% +9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7987 Points ∼82% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (7140 - 8106, n=9)
7600 Points ∼78% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7585 Points ∼78%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7482 Points ∼77% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
5828 Points ∼60% -23%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
5259 Points ∼54% -31%
Essentials
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10487 Points ∼95% +12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9473 Points ∼86% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
9366 Points ∼85% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9364 Points ∼85%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
9350 Points ∼85% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (8852 - 9540, n=9)
9330 Points ∼85% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
8255 Points ∼75% -12%
Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7050 Points ∼91% +25%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5834 Points ∼75% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points ∼74% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (5368 - 5997, n=9)
5706 Points ∼73% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5641 Points ∼73%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
4576 Points ∼59% -19%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3991 Points ∼51% -29%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5764 Points ∼88% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5676 Points ∼87%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5672 Points ∼87% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (5287 - 5931, n=9)
5629 Points ∼86% -1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5079 Points ∼78% -11%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
2486 Points ∼38% -56%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK, Liteon CA1-8D512
4882 Points ∼80% +11%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Turing
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4692 Points ∼77% +7%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
4531 Points ∼74% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (4136 - 5185, n=9)
4487 Points ∼74% +2%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4460 Points ∼73% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4412 Points ∼72% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4401 Points ∼72%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4401 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5676 points
Help

Storage Devices

Razer ships high-end Samsung SSDs for all of its Blade 15 and Blade Pro 17 SKUs while some Blade Stealth SKUs may come with slower Lite-On drives instead. The Samsung PM981 is an upgrade over the Samsung PM951 on the last generation Blade Pro 2017 especially in terms of write rates. A second M.2 2280 PCIe slot is available for additional storage.

See our table of HDDs and SSDs for more benchmark comparisons.

CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
AS SSD
AS SSD
Empty secondary M.2 2280 PCIe slot for expansion or RAID configuration
Empty secondary M.2 2280 PCIe slot for expansion or RAID configuration
Primary SSD adjacent to the two RAM modules
Primary SSD adjacent to the two RAM modules
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Razer Blade Pro 2017
2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
AS SSD
5%
6%
-34%
-19%
Copy Game MB/s
835.38
1152.18
38%
892.89
7%
Copy Program MB/s
588.06
426.44
-27%
513.66
-13%
Copy ISO MB/s
1983.99
2226.35
12%
1489.44
-25%
Score Total
4135
4771
15%
4259
3%
2134
-48%
2715
-34%
Score Write
2033
2091
3%
1589
-22%
978
-52%
676
-67%
Score Read
1385
1721
24%
1776
28%
756
-45%
1414
2%
Access Time Write *
0.035
0.031
11%
0.038
-9%
0.071
-103%
0.036
-3%
Access Time Read *
0.057
0.08
-40%
0.054
5%
0.054
5%
0.051
11%
4K-64 Write
1747.69
1733.9
-1%
1224.16
-30%
732.46
-58%
512.87
-71%
4K-64 Read
1155.86
1576.8
36%
1459.72
26%
587.9
-49%
1116.21
-3%
4K Write
106.01
122.46
16%
96.3
-9%
84.24
-21%
104.44
-1%
4K Read
48.43
53.01
9%
30.31
-37%
25.63
-47%
37.57
-22%
Seq Write
1796.5
2347.01
31%
2686.95
50%
1610.08
-10%
587.97
-67%
Seq Read
1809.65
910.97
-50%
2855
58%
1427.45
-21%
2599.35
44%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3209 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1892 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 595.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 514.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1272 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1292 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.75 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 124.1 MB/s

GPU Performance

Of the seven different laptops we've tested with GeForce RTX 2060 graphics thus far, the Blade Pro 17 tops each of them in 3DMark tests to be one of the fastest laptops you can find with RTX 2060 graphics. Fire Strike and Time Spy results are about 6 percent and 9 percent above the average RTX 2060 in our database, respectively. Note that jumping from the RTX 2060 to the RTX 2070 Max-Q will bring only a minor boost in GPU performance by about 5 to 10 percent. Users considering the RTX 2080 Max-Q SKU over the RTX 2060 will see a much greater performance boost of about 35 percent.

A standard GeForce RTX 2060 desktop GPU will still outperform our mobile RTX 2060 by about 16 percent. GPU performance is surprisingly neck-to-neck with the less efficient Blade Pro 17 GTX 1080 when running DX12 titles.

Be sure to enable Turbo mode through Synapse or else you will not be getting the maximum performance of the GPU.

A "proper" desktop RTX 2060 is still faster than our mobile RTX 2060 by about 15 percent.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Port Royal
Port Royal
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Time Spy
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
5538 Points ∼65% +54%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
5148 Points ∼60% +43%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
4545 Points ∼53% +26%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K
4155 Points ∼49% +16%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
3896 Points ∼46% +8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
3597 Points ∼42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (3020 - 3597, n=10)
3251 Points ∼38% -10%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H
1448 Points ∼17% -60%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
9754 Points ∼68% +48%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
8844 Points ∼62% +34%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
7923 Points ∼56% +20%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K
7815 Points ∼55% +19%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
7732 Points ∼54% +17%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
7105 Points ∼50% +8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
6586 Points ∼46%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
6380 Points ∼45% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (5735 - 6586, n=13)
6049 Points ∼42% -8%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
5689 Points ∼40% -14%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H
5590 Points ∼39% -15%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
3749 Points ∼26% -43%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
3470 Points ∼24% -47%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
24623 Points ∼61% +48%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
23032 Points ∼57% +38%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K
20759 Points ∼51% +25%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
20119 Points ∼50% +21%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
19338 Points ∼48% +16%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
18879 Points ∼46% +13%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
18443 Points ∼45% +11%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
17792 Points ∼44% +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
16647 Points ∼41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (14768 - 17119, n=14)
15821 Points ∼39% -5%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H
14186 Points ∼35% -15%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
12038 Points ∼30% -28%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
9350 Points ∼23% -44%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
136304 Points ∼74% +21%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K
134326 Points ∼73% +19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
124764 Points ∼68% +11%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
124677 Points ∼68% +11%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
115714 Points ∼63% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
112676 Points ∼61%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
107110 Points ∼58% -5%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
107083 Points ∼58% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (77569 - 112768, n=14)
99864 Points ∼54% -11%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H
85805 Points ∼46% -24%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
82913 Points ∼45% -26%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
59375 Points ∼32% -47%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
39014 Points ∼21% -65%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
16523 Points ∼73% +36%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K
15617 Points ∼69% +28%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
13742 Points ∼61% +13%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
12785 Points ∼57% +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
12176 Points ∼54%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
12170 Points ∼54% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (9099 - 14726, n=15)
12077 Points ∼53% -1%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
11904 Points ∼53% -2%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
11573 Points ∼51% -5%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
11288 Points ∼50% -7%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H
10356 Points ∼46% -15%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
10129 Points ∼45% -17%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
7358 Points ∼33% -40%
1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE75 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9880H
34050 Points ∼67% +53%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
30910 Points ∼61% +39%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
27204 Points ∼53% +22%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9700K
26975 Points ∼53% +21%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
26413 Points ∼52% +18%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
24868 Points ∼49% +12%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
23819 Points ∼47% +7%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
23414 Points ∼46% +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
22299 Points ∼44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (19537 - 22299, n=15)
20706 Points ∼41% -7%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9300H
19733 Points ∼39% -12%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
15145 Points ∼30% -32%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9750H
13143 Points ∼26% -41%
3DMark 11 Performance
18741 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37458 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15132 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6608 points
Help

Gaming Performance

The RTX 2060 is powerful enough to run the most demanding titles at 1080p on maximum or near maximum settings. In this case, the Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060 will perform slightly faster than other laptops with the same GPU as predicted by 3DMark. Reaching a stable 144 FPS will still be difficult on most titles outside of undemanding multiplayer ones like Rocket League, Overwatch, Fortnite, or LoL. If >60 FPS will be your goal, then consider the RTX 2080 Max-Q SKU instead.

G-Sync would have paired well with the RTX 2060, but it is not available here. Idling on Witcher 3 shows no recurring frame drops to suggest no interrupting background activity or major throttling behavior when gaming.

See our dedicated page on the mobile GeForce RTX 2060 for more gaming benchmarks and comparisons.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
109 fps ∼100% +35%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
90 fps ∼83% +11%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
85 fps ∼78% +5%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
84 fps ∼77% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
81 fps ∼74%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
78 (min: 42) fps ∼72% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (54 - 81, n=11)
72.1 fps ∼66% -11%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
70 fps ∼64% -14%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
45 fps ∼41% -44%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
95.3 fps ∼100% +47%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
87.4 fps ∼92% +34%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
81.7 (min: 68) fps ∼86% +26%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
76.9 fps ∼81% +18%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
73 (min: 60) fps ∼77% +12%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
72.7 (min: 61, max: 82) fps ∼76% +12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2060
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
65 fps ∼68%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
64.9 fps ∼68% 0%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.4 fps ∼68% -1%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
64 fps ∼67% -2%
Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
63 fps ∼66% -3%
Alienware 17 R5
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
60.8 fps ∼64% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (55.1 - 65, n=14)
59.1 fps ∼62% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
55.1 fps ∼58% -15%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
53.7 fps ∼56% -17%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
39 fps ∼41% -40%
MSI GF75 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
37.7 fps ∼40% -42%
010203040506070