EA Sports FC 24 tech review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks

New name, old problems.

Even though EA has been found guilty of violating gambling laws in several countries, the football simulation game FC (formerly FIFA) still enjoys a certain level of popularity. In this review, we'll take a look at the graphical requirements of the 2024 edition.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Zhiwei Zhuang), Published 10/16/2023 🇩🇪 🇸🇪 ...

Notebooks used in this review

Right now, our gaming benchmarks are performed using these laptops. Click on the images to visit the respective product page. All other test systems (tower PCs, mini-PCs, etc.) are listed at the end of this article.

Technical aspects

For this year’s performance analysis, we were able to simply reuse most of what we wrote about the previous instalment of FIFA. The latest edition of EA’s football videogame inherits the usual strengths and weaknesses of the series. Whilst close-up shots, replays and so on look quite good and realistic (but also cost more performance), the Frostbite engine is still running significantly below its potential in the default perspective during a match, resulting in mediocre visuals. There is probably still a lot of room for improvement here. Though this helps keep hardware requirements fairly low.

The game’s controls could likewise use some improvement. Mouse and keyboard implementation is still rather meh – especially in the menus, which are once again very convoluted and require an unnecessary amount of clicking to navigate. Moreover, even if you choose the Steam version, the mandatory EA app and EA anticheat program are still going to cause issues. For instance, it takes what feels like forever to launch the game, and you’ll also get inexplicable error messages every now and then. Furthermore, during our testing, we noticed frequent stuttering caused by loading in the per se highly atmospheric and well-produced videos – and this happened regardless of the hardware and settings used.

Moving on to the graphics menu: it is fully accessible in-game, just like the one in FIFA 23. Those who are expecting a plethora of options are sadly going to be disappointed. Apart from rendering quality, the only other quality options you can customise are for cutscenes, grass and crowd. There are also options to let you enable or disable frame rate cap, VSync and dynamic resolution. Of course, you can adjust the resolution and display mode in the graphics menu as well. The developers decided not to include modern features such as DLSS or any sort of useful presets. Comparison images for the individual settings are likewise nowhere to be found, but at least written explanations are provided. It is also less than ideal that you need to restart the game after changing some of the settings.

Benchmark

As in previous years, we used a kick-off match between FC Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund for our benchmark (match settings: summer, 4 pm, clear weather). With one half set to 6 real minutes, we used CapFrameX to record the game’s performance for at least 4 game minutes (equivalent to roughly 40 real seconds). Replays were avoided or skipped due to their low FPS count. Because the football simulation game is as before not taxing on the GPU, more powerful graphics cards may be bottlenecked by the CPU at moderate resolutions and settings.

▶ load Youtube video

Results

FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

Whilst iGPUs have trouble running many games even at 720p and the lowest settings, they are often good enough to handle FC 24 at Full HD. For example, a Radeon 680M only falls slightly below the 60 FPS mark at this resolution when details are set to medium or better (which we generally recommend for this game). However, we regularly encountered odd stutters during gameplay, and image rendering didn't look very clean.

EA Sports FC 24
1920x1080 Low Preset 1920x1080 Medium Preset 1920x1080 High Preset 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	312 (152.9^min, 225^P0.1, 244^P1) fps ∼100% 263 (107.2^min, 130.2^P0.1, 201^P1) fps ∼100% 262 (113.1^min, 132.3^P0.1, 202^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	254 (87.2^min, 144.4^P0.1, 181^P1) fps ∼81% 220 (30.2^min, 87^P0.1, 153.6^P1) fps ∼84% 211 (68.3^min, 89.1^P0.1, 151.3^P1) fps ∼81%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	219 (60.4^min, 152.9^P0.1, 169.7^P1) fps ∼70% 179.3 (44.9^min, 81^P0.1, 138.5^P1) fps ∼68% 171.3 (71.2^min, 82^P0.1, 130.7^P1) fps ∼65%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	216 (111.9^min, 128^P0.1, 164.4^P1) fps ∼69% 177.9 (36.1^min, 72.6^P0.1, 126.7^P1) fps ∼68% 167.2 (2.72^min, 75.9^P0.1, 120.3^P1) fps ∼64%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	231 (83.4^min, 161.2^P0.1, 184.1^P1) fps ∼74% 194.3 (4.14^min, 62.3^P0.1, 143^P1) fps ∼74% 182.8 (49.6^min, 86.9^P0.1, 138.9^P1) fps ∼70%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-55	154 (79.4^min, 100.8^P0.1, 115.6^P1) fps ∼49% 134.2 (45.1^min, 60.7^P0.1, 89.4^P1) fps ∼51% 129.7 (33.3^min, 56.2^P0.1, 96.1^P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	192.7 (107.7^min, 138.6^P0.1, 148.9^P1) fps ∼62% 162.3 (33.8^min, 68.1^P0.1, 118.6^P1) fps ∼62% 150.1 (27.4^min, 69.5^P0.1, 105^P1) fps ∼57%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	179.2 (26.5^min, 92.9^P0.1, 121.9^P1) fps ∼57% 149.4 (37^min, 51.6^P0.1, 98.7^P1) fps ∼57% 137.8 (22.4^min, 46.8^P0.1, 72.6^P1) fps ∼53%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	163.8 (86.8^min, 119.7^P0.1, 139.3^P1) fps ∼53% 144 (50.2^min, 63.5^P0.1, 111.7^P1) fps ∼55% 132.5 (42^min, 54.9^P0.1, 76^P1) fps ∼51%
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14	181.5 (93.1^min, 122.2^P0.1, 139.6^P1) fps ∼100% 162.4 (58.9^min, 100.6^P0.1, 125.6^P1) fps ∼52% 138.4 (46.8^min, 56.5^P0.1, 104.1^P1) fps ∼53% 126.2 (24.5^min, 51.7^P0.1, 96.5^P1) fps ∼48%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	107.8 (71.7^min, 84.4^P0.1, 92.4^P1) fps ∼59% 98.4 (25^min, 65.2^P0.1, 79.9^P1) fps ∼32% 78.2 (42.4^min, 43.5^P0.1, 52.3^P1) fps ∼30% 71.9 (23.6^min, 41.4^P0.1, 60.2^P1) fps ∼27%
AMD Radeon 680M, R9 6900HS Asus ROG Zephyrus G14	80.3 (25.7^min, 27.8^P0.1, 36.1^P1) fps ∼44% 57.9 (13.7^min, 19^P0.1, 23.3^P1) fps ∼19% 42 (12.4^min, 12.5^P0.1, 17.1^P1) fps ∼16% 39.5 (5.97^min, 7.1^P0.1, 12.6^P1) fps ∼15%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

A mid-range card is all you need to enjoy the game at QHD. For instance, a GeForce RTX 4050 is already capable enough to churn out around 100 FPS at 1440p and max settings.

EA Sports FC 24
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	261 (97.7^min, 124^P0.1, 196.5^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	203 (76.4^min, 82.8^P0.1, 132^P1) fps ∼78%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	167.6 (37.4^min, 72.7^P0.1, 126.7^P1) fps ∼64%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	163.4 (4.3^min, 21.5^P0.1, 98.5^P1) fps ∼63%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	151.7 (27.1^min, 65.9^P0.1, 112.1^P1) fps ∼58%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	138.4 (38.6^min, 58.7^P0.1, 107.5^P1) fps ∼53%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-55	129.2 (32.6^min, 60.2^P0.1, 80.5^P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	121 (30.1^min, 42.9^P0.1, 71.6^P1) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	100.9 (29.4^min, 42.3^P0.1, 58.9^P1) fps ∼39%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	51.7 (32.4^min, 33.8^P0.1, 42.6^P1) fps ∼20%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

You don’t necessarily need a high-end GPU to run the game at 4K. Even the previously mentioned RTX 4050 has enough power to come close to the 60 FPS mark at 4K and Ultra settings.

EA Sports FC 24
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	188 (90.5^min, 107.3^P0.1, 145.7^P1) fps ∼100%
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F	166.9 (60.3^min, 75.4^P0.1, 121.8^P1) fps ∼89%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Neo 17 E23	153.2 (35.2^min, 49.8^P0.1, 106.2^P1) fps ∼81%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	125.2 (25.7^min, 57.6^P0.1, 94.7^P1) fps ∼67%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733ZX	97.8 (43.7^min, 47.3^P0.1, 77^P1) fps ∼52%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	82.4 (31.6^min, 34.9^P0.1, 61.7^P1) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-55	81.8 (32.4^min, 36.7^P0.1, 62.2^P1) fps ∼44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Pro 15 E23	70.7 (39.3^min, 42.6^P0.1, 58.2^P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX XMG Focus 15 E23	56.8 (21^min, 27.3^P0.1, 39.9^P1) fps ∼30%
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS Minisforum Venus Series UM790 Pro	26.8 (15.4^min, 15.5^P0.1, 17.1^P1) fps ∼14%

Note

Because gaming tests are very time-consuming and are often constrained by installation or activation limits, we are only able to provide you with part of the benchmark results at the time of publishing this article. We will be adding more graphics cards over the coming days and weeks.

Overview

All test systems

Notebook	Graphics card	Processor	Memory
XMG Neo 17 E23	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @175 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Schenker Key 17 Pro E23	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Pro 15 E23	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
XMG Focus 15 E23	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 @140 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-12900H	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Acer Predator Helios 300	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti @150 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-12700H	2 x 8 GB DDR5
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14	AMD Radeon RX 6800S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 680M	AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2 x 16 GB DDR5

Tower PC	Graphics card	Processor	Memory
Custom I / Asus ROG Strix Z790-F / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB	Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-13900K	2 x 24 GB DDR5
Custom II	Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC (24 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X) MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Suprim X (8 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (8 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6) Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6) PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5) KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 7600 (8 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (16 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6800 (16 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT (12 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6600 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 7950X	2 x 16 GB DDR5

Mini-PC	Graphics card	Processor	Memory
Minisforum NUCXi7	Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 @125 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 8 GB DDR4
Minisforum HX99G	AMD Radeon RX 6600M @100 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2 x 16 GB DDR5
Minisforum Neptune Series HN2673	Intel Arc A730M	Intel Core i7-12650H	2 x 8 GB DDR4
Minisforum UM790 Pro	AMD Radeon 780M	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2 x 32 GB DDR5

4K monitors	Operating system	Nvidia driver	AMD driver
Gigabyte M32U	Windows 11	ForceWare 537.58	Adrenalin 23.10.1

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser - Managing Editor Gaming Laptops - 638 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009

I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood, growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 1990s. I was especially fascinated with computer games, even from an early age. From Monkey Island through Lands of Lore to Doom, I tried every game I could get my hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with my focus mostly being on high-performance gaming laptops.

Translator: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

After graduating with a bachelor’s degree in environmental engineering, I moved from Singapore to Cologne in 2014 and began pursuing a career as a freelance translator. Much of my translation work focuses on science, engineering and technology. My fascination with computers and mobile electronics began when I was young. And I have fond memories reading countless tech and gaming magazines. Working with Notebookcheck gives me the opportunity to incorporate my personal interests into my professional work.

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > EA Sports FC 24 tech review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks

Florian Glaser, 2023-10-16 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > EA Sports FC 24 (2023)
Pos	Model	low 1920x1080 Low Preset	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset	high 1920x1080 High Preset	ultra 1920x1080 Ultra Preset	QHD 2560x1440 Ultra Preset	4K 3840x2160 Ultra Preset
3	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090	391ⁿ²	328.5ⁿ²	274.5ⁿ²	272ⁿ²	271ⁿ²	252ⁿ²
9	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080		312	263	262	261	188
14	AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT		254	220	211	203	166.9
18	AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT	412	299	360	254	220	143.9
20	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU		219	179.3	171.3	167.6	153.2
22	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090	374	318	264	264	248	157.7
30	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU		216	177.9	167.2	163.4	125.2
41	AMD Radeon RX 6800	366	322	263	225	193.8	124
42	AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT	395	345	274	246	199.1	127.2
43	NVIDIA Titan RTX	338	292	247	228	178.7	109.5
45	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti	358	318	262	246	190	116.6
48	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU		231	194.3	174.55ⁿ²	151.7	97.8
50	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU		192.7	162.3	150.1	138.4	82.4
54	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	323	287	243	207	170.9	98.9
56	AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT	315	284	235	198.3	166.7	97.8
57	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	194.2	174.2	148.6	148.35ⁿ²	129.85ⁿ²	79.95ⁿ²
58	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	310	280	230	193.6	148.2	90.6
60	Intel Arc A770	221	201	161.3	152.5	123	77
62	AMD Radeon RX 7600	304	274	215	180.4	144.7	87.8
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >EA Sports FC 24
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
64	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU		154	134.2	129.7	129.2	81.8
67	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	198.3	179.2ⁿ³	149.4ⁿ³	137.8ⁿ³	119.25ⁿ²	70.7
72	AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT	280	253	198	165.8	128.8	75.1
76	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	249	199.3	161.7	151.4	129	79.5
78	AMD Radeon RX 6800S	181.5	162.4	138.4	126.2
80*	AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT	202	172.2	142.7	128.3	105.3	68.7
81	Intel Arc A750	191.8	176.2	136.5	127.2	105.7	67.7
91	NVIDIA Titan X Pascal	205	184.1	153.4	136.2	105.5	66.6
96	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop)	254	230	185.1	170.8	131.3	76.5
100	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)	285	250	195.7	173	139.7	88.1
106	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU				125.6	101	58.2
108	AMD Radeon RX 7600S		183	153.3	131.3	103.7	64.6
115	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)	217	199.1	167.7	146.9	111.5	67.4
116*	Intel Arc A770M					116.9
117	AMD Radeon RX 6600	249	222	173.9	147.4	112.6	67
121	AMD Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop)	247	218	183.4	157.1	120.4	75.6
154	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (Desktop)	239	210	168.7	146.3	113.8	71.8
162	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop)	180.8	164	141.7	120.8	89.2	18.8
164	AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT	161.4	145.7	101.3	55.7	44.2	28.8
165	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (Desktop)	170.7	151.7	124.8	101.3	77.8	46.4
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >EA Sports FC 24
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
166	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU		163.8	144	132.5	100.9	56.8
169*	Intel Arc A730M				121.8
175	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile				93.9
181	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop)	166.9	156.7	130	107.2	77.9	23.8
185	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop)	157.3	144	114.6	103.5	65.8	7.5
194	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU				73.2
215	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile				66.8
217	AMD Radeon RX 5500M		82.7	65.9	62.3
227	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile				43.2
231	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile				58
232	NVIDIA GeForce MX570		62.8	42.6	12.1
276*	AMD Radeon 780M	104.5ⁿ²	94ⁿ²	75.6ⁿ²	56.25ⁿ²	51.7	26.8
284	AMD Radeon 680M	80.3	57.9	42	39.5
290*	NVIDIA GeForce MX450	58	57.3	56.4	55.9
317*	AMD Radeon 760M				47.9
353	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	43.6
354	NVIDIA GeForce MX350	32.4
371	NVIDIA GeForce MX250	22.9
375	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	34.6
423*	Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	23.9
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >EA Sports FC 24
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
424*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 10	30.3	26.9	20.3
463*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	24.1
473*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	34
558*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	32.1
632	Intel UHD Graphics 630	13.1
634*	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)	10.7
716*	AMD Radeon RX Vega 3	13.8

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.