Notebookcheck Logo

PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC Graphics Card Review: A small GPU for compact PCs

A good 1080p alternative. The GeForce GTX 1660 closes the gap between the GTX 1650 and the GTX 1660 Ti, although NVIDIA has now released SUPER flavours of the GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 too. The GTX 1660 comes with 6 GB of GDDR5 VRAM, while the PNY XLR8 Gaming OC has a relatively economical TDP of 120 W. Read on to find out how well this compact desktop GPU gets on in our tests and how it compares against other cards.
GPU-Z
GPU-Z

NVIDIA pitches the GeForce GTX 1660 between the GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti not only on price but also performance. As its name suggests, the GPU has no ray-tracing cores, which NVIDIA reserves for the RTX series.

NVIDIA has included an 8-pin power connector on the GTX 1660 as it requires a little more power under load than its Turing entry-level sibling, the GTX 1650. However, the GTX 1660 has fewer shaders and texture units than the GTX 1660 Ti, along with GDDR5 rather than GDDR6 VRAM. Correspondingly, the GTX 1660 has a lower memory bandwidth than the GTX 1660 Ti too, although both operate on the same memory bus. The GTX 1660 has the edge over the GTX 1660 Ti on clock speeds. Both have 6 GB of VRAM too.

The PNY XLR8 Gaming OC has an HDMI 2.0b port, along with DVI and DisplayPort connections.

PNY includes 36 months' warranty as standard too, which is a nice touch. Please see our Guarantees, Return Policies & Warranties FAQ for country-specific information.

PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC

An overview of NVIDIA Turing GPUs

Specifications GTX 1650 GTX 1660 GTX 1660 Ti RTX 2060 RTX 2070 RTX 2080 RTX 2080 Ti
GPU TU117 TU116 TU116 TU106 TU106 TU104 TU102
Process 12 nm 12 nm 12 nm 12 nm 12 nm 12 nm 12 nm
Shader units 896 1,408 1,536 1,920 2,304 2,944 4,352
Texture units 56 88 96 120 144 184 272
Tensor Cores - - - 240 288 368 544
RT Cores - - - 30 36 46 68
GPU base clock 1,485 MHz 1,530 MHz 1,500 MHz 1,365 MHz 1,410 MHz 1,515 MHz 1,350 MHz
GPU boost clock 1,665 MHz 1,785 MHz 1,770 MHz 1,680 MHz 1,620 MHz 1,710 MHz 1,545 MHz
Memory bus 128 Bit 192 Bit 192 Bit 192 Bit 256 Bit 256 Bit 352 Bit
Memory bandwidth 128 GB/s 192.1 GB/s 288 GB/s 336 GB/s 448 GB/s 448 GB/s 616 GB/s
VRAM 4 GB GDDR5 6 GB GDDR5 6 GB GDDR6 6 GB GDDR6 8 GB GDDR6 8 GB GDDR6 11 GB GDDR6
TDP 75 W 120 W 120 W 160 W 175 W 215 W 250 W

The Test System - AMD Ryzen 9 3900X as a base

We paired the XLR8 Gaming OC with an MSI MEG X570 Godlike motherboard and an AMD Ryzen 9 3900X processor for our tests. The Ryzen 9 3900X offers excellent performance as we discovered in our review earlier this year, and we used a Be Quiet Silent Loop 280 mm AIO to keep it cool. We also used 16 GB of G-Skill Trident Z Royal Gold RAM that we left clocked at 3,600 MHz on CL16-16-16-36. Finally, we ran all our benchmarks and tests on an Acer Predator XB321HK, a 4K monitor that we have used in many of our gaming reviews.

A big thank you to AMD for kindly providing us with this test platform.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
MSI MEG X570 Godlike
G-Skill Trident Z Royal Gold DDR4-3600

We used the following hardware for our tests and benchmarks:

Case Corsair Carbide Air 540 ATX Cube
CPU AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GPU PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC
CPU cooler Be Quiet Silent Loop 280 mm
RAM G-Skill Trident Z Royal Gold DDR4-3600 2 x 8 GB (DDR4-3600 CL16-16-16-36)
Motherboard MSI MEG X570 Godlike (BIOS 1.20, Default Settings, XMP 1 for DDR4-3600 CL16)
Monitor Acer Predator XB321HK 4K
Power supply Corsair RM 1000X
SSD Corsair MP600 2 TB M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSD
SDD Western Digital SN720 512 GB - for games
SSD Crucial MX500 2 TB - for games
OS Microsoft Windows 10 Professional 64-Bit (Version 1903)
Drivers NVIDIA 441.12

Clock speeds - A higher boost clock than NVIDIA reference speeds

The XLR8 Gaming OC remains close to NVIDIA reference clock speeds. The card can hit 1,830 MHz though, which is 45 MHz higher than the 1,785 MHz reference boost clock. Its 1,530 MHz base clock is unchanged though, as is its 2,000 MHz VRAM clock speed. Correspondingly, the XLR8 Gaming OC has the same 192.1 GB/s memory bandwidth as other GTX 1660 cards.

GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z

Synthetic Benchmarks - Keeping pace with the Radeon RX 570

The XLR8 Gaming OC performed as expected in synthetic benchmarks, namely between the GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti. Nonetheless, the gap between our review unit and the GTX 1660 Ti is between 10 and 30%. However, our review unit scores up to 60% more than the GTX 1650, with the largest gaps occurring at higher resolutions because of the additional 2 GB of VRAM that the GTX 1660 has.

Compared to AMD, the XLR8 Gamin OC roughly performs on par with the AMD Radeon RX 570. While the former matches the latter in most instances, the RX 570 occasionally has an edge because of its higher volume of VRAM.

Performance Rating - Percent
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT -1!
95.2 pt
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super -31!
88.3 pt
AMD Radeon RX 5700 -1!
84.1 pt
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
76.6 pt
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
64.3 pt
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB -3!
61.6 pt
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB -1!
51.8 pt
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
50.7 pt
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
38.9 pt
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
25383 Points +83%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
22457 Points +62%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
21772 Points +57%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
19338 Points +40%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
16746 Points +21%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
16024 Points +16%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
13847 Points
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
13827 Points 0%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
9195 Points -34%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
12209 Points +90%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
10876 Points +70%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
10540 Points +64%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
9097 Points +42%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
7328 Points +14%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
7184 Points +12%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
6414 Points
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
6077 Points -5%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
4044 Points -37%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
5955 Points +122%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
5292 Points +97%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
5185 Points +93%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
4244 Points +58%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
3702 Points +38%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
3158 Points +18%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
3070 Points +14%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
2684 Points
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
1674 Points -38%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
8673 Points +58%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
8673 Points +58%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
7732 Points +41%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
7675 Points +39%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
6131 Points +11%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
5502 Points
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
4863 Points -12%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
3958 Points -28%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
3492 Points -37%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
35715 Points +73%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
31570 Points +53%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
29419 Points +42%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
26413 Points +28%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
23202 Points +12%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
22128 Points +7%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
20696 Points
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
18967 Points -8%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
13759 Points -34%
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
115.8 fps +41%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
110.2 fps +34%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
100.7 fps +22%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
94.3 fps +14%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
82.4 fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
60.3 fps -27%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
55.7 fps -32%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
54.3 fps -34%
Extreme Preset DX11
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
132.5 fps +51%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
124.1 fps +42%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
119.9 fps +37%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
100.9 fps +15%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
87.6 fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
76.1 fps -13%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
64.7 fps -26%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
56.8 fps -35%
Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
106.3 fps +66%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
99.3 fps +55%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
91.2 fps +42%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
77.4 fps +21%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
64.2 fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
57.3 fps -11%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
49.1 fps -24%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
42.1 fps -34%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
89.1 fps +51%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
83.6 fps +41%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
82.7 fps +40%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
70.5 fps +19%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
59.1 fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
50 fps -15%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
42.8 fps -28%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
40 fps -32%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
2586 Samples/s +27%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
2108 Samples/s +4%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
2104 Samples/s +4%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
2030 Samples/s
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
1996 Samples/s -2%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
1856 Samples/s -9%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
1600 Samples/s -21%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
1368 Samples/s -33%
Sala GPUs-only
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
6188 Samples/s +52%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
5655 Samples/s +39%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
5312 Samples/s +31%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
4440 Samples/s +9%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
4084 Samples/s 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
4070 Samples/s
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
3282 Samples/s -19%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
2577 Samples/s -37%
ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
5761 Points +54%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
4903 Points +31%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
4703 Points +26%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
3975 Points +6%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
3740 Points
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
3299 Points -12%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
2538 Points -32%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
2444 Points -35%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
4869 Points +121%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
4043 Points +84%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
3312 Points +51%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
2982 Points +36%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
2478 Points +13%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
2362 Points +7%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
2199 Points
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
1474 Points -33%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
4246 Points +92%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
3532 Points +60%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
2802 Points +27%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
2800 Points +26%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
2327 Points +5%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
2214 Points
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
2169 Points -2%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
1628 Points -26%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
1960 Points +90%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
1810 Points +76%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
1801 Points +75%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
1452 Points +41%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
1140 Points +11%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
1030 Points
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
997 Points -3%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
673 Points -35%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
2349 Points +123%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
2294 Points +118%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
1889 Points +79%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
1531 Points +45%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
1239 Points +18%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
1106 Points +5%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
1054 Points
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
698 Points -34%
1024x600 Normal, Score
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
19184 Points +87%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
16383 Points +60%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
14375 Points +40%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
11791 Points +15%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
11648 Points +14%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
10237 Points
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
9194 Points -10%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
7011 Points -32%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
89.6 fps +107%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
79.2 fps +83%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
70.4 fps +62%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
59.9 fps +38%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
57.6 fps +33%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
55.4 fps +28%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
43.33 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
43.33 fps
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
35.27 fps +444%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
33.5 fps +417%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
24.87 fps +284%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
19.35 fps +199%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
8.55 fps +32%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
8.35 fps +29%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
6.48 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
6.48 fps
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
46.9 fps +119%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
40.97 fps +91%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
35.22 fps +65%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
33.92 fps +58%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
31.75 fps +48%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
21.41 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
21.41 fps
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
18.12 fps -15%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
127.4 fps +49%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
123.2 fps +44%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
86.5 fps +1%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
85.3 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
85.3 fps
AMD Radeon RX 5700
73.3 fps -14%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
66.2 fps -22%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
31.7 fps -63%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
12.72 fps +478%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
11.53 fps +424%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
9.19 fps +318%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
7.89 fps +259%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
5.95 fps +170%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
4.27 fps +94%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
2.2 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
2.2 fps
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
66.9 fps +145%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
60.2 fps +120%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
49.01 fps +79%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
44.45 fps +62%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
41.33 fps +51%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
36.6 fps +34%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
27.36 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
27.36 fps
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
158.8 fps +271%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
135.7 fps +217%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
123.5 fps +188%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
74.8 fps +75%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
65.9 fps +54%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
54.6 fps +27%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
42.85 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
42.85 fps
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
183.6 fps +73%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
173.8 fps +63%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
159 fps +49%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
155.7 fps +46%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
120.3 fps +13%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
107.9 fps +1%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
106.4 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
106.4 fps
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
114.4 fps +88%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
101.8 fps +67%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
83.4 fps +37%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
82.9 fps +36%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
79.9 fps +31%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
77.5 fps +27%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
60.8 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
60.8 fps
Siemens NX (snx-03)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
61.3 fps +428%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
60.5 fps +422%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
44.18 fps +281%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
38.28 fps +230%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
15.26 fps +32%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
14.99 fps +29%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
11.6 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
11.6 fps
Medical (medical-02)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
82.8 fps +199%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
67.5 fps +144%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
49.1 fps +78%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
43.54 fps +57%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
42.08 fps +52%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
27.9 fps +1%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
27.66 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
27.66 fps
Maya (maya-05)
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
247 fps +91%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
220.3 fps +71%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
202.7 fps +57%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
185.2 fps +43%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
151 fps +17%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
143.9 fps +11%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
129.2 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
129.2 fps
Energy (energy-02)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
26.82 fps +831%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
24.55 fps +752%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
11.17 fps +288%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
8.98 fps +212%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
8.1 fps +181%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
7.62 fps +165%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
2.88 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
2.88 fps
Creo (creo-02)
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
169.8 fps +94%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
157 fps +79%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
133.5 fps +53%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
116.7 fps +33%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
90 fps +3%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
87.5 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
87.5 fps
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
80.2 fps -8%
Catia (catia-05)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
242.8 fps +302%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
209.2 fps +246%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
168.9 fps +180%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
153.6 fps +154%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
108.2 fps +79%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
94.3 fps +56%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
60.4 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
60.4 fps
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
184.4 fps +75%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
175.6 fps +66%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
159.4 fps +51%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
157 fps +49%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
120.4 fps +14%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
108.4 fps +3%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
105.5 fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
105.5 fps
SiSoft Sandra 2016
Image Processing
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
919 MPix/s +35%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
912 MPix/s +34%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
775 MPix/s +14%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
737 MPix/s +8%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
681 MPix/s
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
440.6 MPix/s -35%
GP Cryptography (Higher Security AES256+SHA2-512)
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
63.8 GB/s +22%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
52.2 GB/s
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
46.29 GB/s -11%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
29.52 GB/s -43%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
23.8 GB/s -54%
GP Financial Analysis (FP High/Double Precision)
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
137.4 KOPT/s +97%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
99.1 KOPT/s +42%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
73.8 KOPT/s +6%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
69.6 KOPT/s
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
44.82 KOPT/s -36%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
24 KOPT/s -66%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
20.81 KOPT/s -70%
3DMark 05 Standard
53031 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score
43633 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
57895 points
3DMark 11 Performance
19912 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
176879 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
45665 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12629 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
6359 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5985 points
Help

Gaming Benchmarks - A solid 1080p gamer

The Witcher 3: Response times – ultra preset
The Witcher 3: Response times – ultra preset
The Witcher 3: Frame rates – ultra preset
The Witcher 3: Frame rates – ultra preset

The XLR8 Gaming OC also convinced in our gaming tests. The GPU runs out of steam at 1440p and 2160p though, so we would recommend only using it for 1080p gaming. While the GPU is limited in that sense, it outperforms the GTX 1650 to an even greater extent than it does in synthetic benchmarks as our tables below demonstrate.

Our review unit closes the gap to the GTX 1660 Ti too, although please keep in mind that we tested the latter on a slower test system. Conversely, our Polaris generation comparison GPUs struggle to keep pace with the XLR8 Gaming OC. Even the XFX RX 590 falls short of our review unit, which is rather surprising. Only Navi GPUs outperform the XLR8 Gaming OC of our AMD comparison cards, but these are significantly more expensive than PNY's offering.

In short, the XLR8 Gaming OC offers good gaming performance. The card can even handle the latest triple-A games like Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, GRID (2019) or Need for Speed Heat in 1080p. Meanwhile, less resource-intensive titles like FIFA 20 can even be played at 2160p.

We also looked at how the card performs under sustained load by running The Witcher 3 on the ultra preset at 1080p for an hour. As the graph below demonstrates, the built-in cooler keeps the GPU cool enough to maintain peak performance over prolonged periods. Our review unit only fluctuated between 54 and 59 FPS during this test, so you should not notice any performance drops in long gaming sessions. Frame times were nothing of note either.

The Witcher 3: Frame rates – ultra preset

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X: Ø56.4 (54-59)
Forza Horizon 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
149 fps +52%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
138 fps +41%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
118 fps +20%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
110 fps +12%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
98 fps
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
97 fps -1%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
91 fps -7%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
75 fps -23%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
65 fps -34%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
110 (85min - 145max) fps +34%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
99 (75min - 131max) fps +21%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
96 (75min - 127max) fps +17%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
91 (78min - 105max) fps +11%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
84 (59min - 114max) fps +2%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
82 (73min - 93max) fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
74 (67min - 88max) fps -10%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
65 (58min - 79max) fps -21%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
56 (50min - 66max) fps -32%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
94 (86min - 103max) fps +69%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
92 (79min - 99max) fps +66%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
80 (70min - 87max) fps +44%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
79 (67min - 89max) fps +42%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
62 (43min - 74max) fps +12%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
55.5 (50min - 63max) fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
50.8 (42min - 57max) fps -8%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
43 (37min - 47max) fps -23%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
43 (37min - 47max) fps -23%
Farming Simulator 19 - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
119 (99min - 161max) fps +3%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
118 (106min - 156max) fps +2%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
116 (101min - 151max) fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
116 (93min - 186max) fps
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
94 (76min - 121max) fps -19%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
76 (60min - 125max) fps -34%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
69 (44min - 117max) fps -41%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
56.1 (43min - 100max) fps -52%
Darksiders III - 1920x1080 Epic
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
121 (52min - 160max) fps +46%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
108 (63min - 126max) fps +30%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
103 (49min - 123max) fps +24%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
93 (64min - 104max) fps +12%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
88 (60min - 103max) fps +6%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
83 (61min - 94max) fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
68.2 (50min - 76max) fps -18%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
55.8 (48min - 63max) fps -33%
Apex Legends - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:TS AF:16x
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
144 (143min - 145max) fps +30%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
144 (143min - 145max) fps +30%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
142 (136min - 145max) fps +28%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
112 (104min - 126max) fps +1%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
111 (93.5P1) fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
96 (88min - 110max) fps -14%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
77 (71min - 91max) fps -31%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
67 (56min - 78max) fps -40%
Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
97 (69min - 147max) fps +21%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
85 (63min - 134max) fps +6%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
84 (65min - 110max) fps +5%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
83 (60min - 132max) fps +4%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
80 (64min - 96max) fps
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
79 (58min - 120max) fps -1%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
76 (58min - 102max) fps -5%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
66 (49min - 86max) fps -17%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
55 (44min - 67max) fps -31%
Metro Exodus - 1920x1080 Ultra Quality AF:16x
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
61 (36.09min - 86.1max) fps +61%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
58.9 (32min - 92max) fps +55%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
58.6 (32.67min - 85.8max) fps +54%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
42.7 (24min - 66max) fps +12%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
38 (22min - 57max) fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
37.9 (21min - 58max) fps 0%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
31.7 (18min - 49max) fps -17%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
25.4 (15min - 38max) fps -33%
The Division 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
88 (30.2min, 50P1) fps +49%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
85 fps +44%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
78 (14.6min, 42.2P1) fps +32%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
70 fps +19%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
60 fps +2%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
59 fps
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
44 fps -25%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
39 fps -34%
Anno 1800 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
45 (37min - 58max) fps +29%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
40.9 (35min - 53max) fps +17%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
40.3 (30min - 55max) fps +15%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
38.9 (33min - 48max) fps +11%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
35.9 (32min - 41max) fps +3%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
34.9 (32min - 40max) fps
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
26.3 (23min - 29max) fps -25%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
25.1 (23min - 27max) fps -28%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
23.3 (21min - 25max) fps -33%
Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
104 (65.1P1) fps +46%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
103 (94.3P1) fps +45%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
71 (60.9P1) fps 0%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
71 (57.5P1) fps
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
58.8 (52.1P1) fps -17%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
43.7 (38.1P1) fps -38%
F1 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
152 (129min - 171max) fps +85%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
140 (120min - 156max) fps +71%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
124 (107min - 140max) fps +51%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
121 (108min - 136max) fps +48%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
86 (77min - 98max) fps +5%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
82 (71min - 92max) fps
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
72 (65min - 80max) fps -12%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
52 (42min - 64max) fps -37%
Rocket League - 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
244 (206min - 252max) fps +33%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
242 (207min - 252max) fps +32%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
230.2 (192min - 252max) fps +26%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
205 (151min - 228max) fps +12%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
183 (147min - 246max) fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
93 fps
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
77 fps -17%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
57.1 fps -39%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
48.1 fps -48%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
47 fps -49%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
114 fps +58%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X
110 fps +53%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X
96 fps +33%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X
90 fps +25%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
76.7 fps +7%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
72 fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
66 fps -8%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X
55.1 fps -23%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X
44 fps -39%
FIFA 20 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R9 3900X
284 (204.1P1) fps +19%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
282 (208.3P1) fps +18%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R9 3900X
266 (196.1P1) fps +11%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R9 3900X
248 (178.6P1) fps +4%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
239 (175.4P1) fps
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R9 3900X
234 (172.4P1) fps -2%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R9 3900X
184 (140.8P1) fps -23%
Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
83 (72min - 95max) fps +58%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R9 3900X
80 (70min - 91max) fps +52%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R9 3900X
73 (63min - 83max) fps +39%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
52.5 (45min - 60max) fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R9 3900X
48.3 (42min - 56max) fps -8%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R9 3900X
40.2 (34min - 46max) fps -23%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R9 3900X
33.3 (28min - 39max) fps -37%
Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
71.7 fps +46%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R9 3900X
68.7 fps +40%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R9 3900X
66.7 fps +36%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
49 fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R9 3900X
42.1 fps -14%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R9 3900X
35.2 fps -28%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R9 3900X
30.1 fps -39%
Ghost Recon Breakpoint - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
80 (35min - 125max) fps +63%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R9 3900X
71 (24min - 106max) fps +45%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R9 3900X
68 (36min - 104max) fps +39%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
49 (30min - 69max) fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R9 3900X
46 (34min - 67max) fps -6%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R9 3900X
45 (35min - 75max) fps -8%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R9 3900X
8 (4min - 34max) fps -84%
GRID 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
96 (61.3P1) fps +43%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R9 3900X
91 (55.9P1) fps +36%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R9 3900X
90 (59.5P1) fps +34%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
67 (47.2P1) fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R9 3900X
64 (42.7P1) fps -4%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R9 3900X
47.1 (31.8P1) fps -30%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R9 3900X
43.1 (32.9P1) fps -36%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
112 (83.3P1) fps +42%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R9 3900X
109 (82P1) fps +38%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R9 3900X
95 (69.9P1) fps +20%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
79 (62.5P1) fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R9 3900X
76 (54.1P1) fps -4%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R9 3900X
64 (49P1) fps -19%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R9 3900X
51.7 (40P1) fps -35%
Need for Speed Heat - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R9 3900X
92 (76min - 107max) fps +31%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X
88 (74min - 99max) fps +26%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R9 3900X
88 (74min - 103max) fps +26%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X
70 (57min - 78max) fps
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R9 3900X
60 (55min - 67max) fps -14%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R9 3900X
48.4 (38min - 56max) fps -31%
low med. high ultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 282 181 99 55.5 34.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 163.7 152.4 145.9 136.7 85.9
Rocket League (2017) 249 249 183 129 81
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 127 114 93 79
Far Cry 5 (2018) 142 95 87 82 57 29
Strange Brigade (2018) 313 129 105 88.1 63.7 34.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 152 92 80 72 47 23
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) 200 132 123 98 76 50
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 242 190 153 116 80 41.9
Darksiders III (2018) 196 115 96 83 54.5 18.8
Apex Legends (2019) 144 144 114 111 77 43.6
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 132 92 87 80 58 31
Metro Exodus (2019) 118 61 45 38 29 19
The Division 2 (2019) 185 103 82 59 40 21
Anno 1800 (2019) 94 92 69 34.9 23.6 14
Rage 2 (2019) 168 83 71 71 45.3 21.7
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 237.8 98.2 60.6 42 25.8
F1 2019 (2019) 261 142 123 82 64 38
Control (2019) 198 70 52.5 31.6 15.8
Borderlands 3 (2019) 143 91 61 49 34 14
FIFA 20 (2019) 265 262 241 239 202 127
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 114 73 67 49 34 17
GRID 2019 (2019) 160 119 97 67 51.4 31.9
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 159 112 90 79 56.8 31.6
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 111 89 79 70 49.5 23
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 112 90 81 53.1 26.4
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 130 73 49.1 30.9 24.7
Escape from Tarkov (2020) 121 121 93.2 79.2 47.6 23.9
Hunt Showdown (2020) 211 82.1 64.8 39.7 19.8
Doom Eternal (2020) 257 138 121 115 71.7 38.2
Gears Tactics (2020) 297.9 141.7 92 61.9 43 22.8
Valorant (2020) 324.5 306.2 287.1 226.3 125.3
F1 2020 (2020) 292 160 128 89.8 66.1 37.2
Death Stranding (2020) 138 86.7 79.3 77.6 53.3 28.6
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 130 82 67 54 40 21
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) 84.6 49.9 35.8 23.7 18.4 10.4
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 141.5 81.4 68 50.5 38.8 24.4
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 135.9 70.6 64.9 42.7 21.8
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 389 203 172 157 103 57.8
FIFA 21 (2020) 231 227 214 214 187 120
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 114 77.9 65.9 29.4 19.4 12

Emissions - Noisy, but no coil whine

PNY has set the TDP of the XLR8 Gaming OC at 120 W, the same as the GTX 1660 Ti has. Nevertheless, the latter offers better performance per watt because of its higher volume of shader and texture units. Having GDDR6 VRAM instead of GDDR5 helps the GTX 1660 Ti pull away from the GTX 1660 too.

Our test system consumes just under 80 W when idling, a value that increases to 248 W under sustained load. Incidentally, PNY allows the power target (PT) of the GPU to be increased to 107%, which results in a peak TDP of 128.4 W. We confirmed this during our tests, while our test system peaked at 258 W under load too.

We encountered no temperature issues with the XLR8 Gaming OC during our tests. Core temperatures peaked at 76 °C even with its PT set to 107%, although the PCB reached 86 °C. This is still within safe limits, though. Reducing the PT to 100% resulted in temperatures dropping to 80 °C on the back of the PCB too.

Additionally, the GPU fan runs more quietly when at 100% PT, but our review unit always run comparatively loudly. We did not hear any coil whine during our tests, though.

Heat map of the PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC during a stress test (PT 100%)
Heat map of the PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC during a stress test (PT 100%)
Heat map of the PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC during a stress test (PT 100%)
Heat map of the PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC during a stress test (PT 100%)
Heat map of the PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC during a stress test (PT 107%)
Heat map of the PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC during a stress test (PT 107%)
Power consumption of our test system at idle
Power consumption of our test system at idle
Power consumption of our test system during a FurMark PT 100% stress test
Power consumption of our test system during a FurMark PT 100% stress test
Power consumption of our test system during a FurMark PT 107% stress test
Power consumption of our test system during a FurMark PT 107% stress test
Power consumption of our test system while playing The Witcher 3 on the ultra preset
Power consumption of our test system while playing The Witcher 3 on the ultra preset
System information during a FurMark PT 100% stress test
System information during a FurMark PT 100% stress test
System information during a FurMark PT 107% stress test
System information during a FurMark PT 107% stress test
 
 
Power Consumption
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X (Idle: 83.2 W)
376.4 (373min - 382max) Watt * -51%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R9 3900X (Idle: 85.9 W)
358.9 (351min - 370max) Watt * -44%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X (Idle: 69.8 W)
348.7 (341min - 359max) Watt * -40%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
346.9 (326min - 364max) Watt * -40%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R9 3900X (Idle: 86.7 W)
331 (322min - 344max) Watt * -33%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R9 3900X (Idle: 77.9 W)
317.5 (313min, 216P1 - 326max) Watt * -28%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R9 3900X (Idle: 85.5 W)
300.2 (284min - 311max) Watt * -21%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X (82.7 fps, Idle: 77.12 W)
298.2 (293min - 322max) Watt * -20%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X (84.2 fps, Idle: 64.5 W)
295.9 (284min - 304max) Watt * -19%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X (Idle: 74.66 W)
288.8 (284min - 299max) Watt * -16%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X (Idle: 72.61 W)
274 (268min - 300max) Watt * -10%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X (Idle: 79.88 W)
248.6 (240min - 259max) Watt *
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X (Idle: 68.3 W)
235.5 (232min - 269max) Watt * +5%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R9 3900X (Idle: 82.4 W)
203.9 (199min - 215max) Watt * +18%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X (Idle: 64.63 W)
178.9 (176min - 192max) Watt * +28%
1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor)
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R9 3900X (Idle: 85.9 W)
371.7 (360min - 388max) Watt * -50%
XFX AMD Radeon RX 590 OC+ 8 GB
Radeon RX 590, R7 2700X
357.5 (347min - 383max) Watt * -44%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R9 3900X (Idle: 83.2 W)
352.1 (346min - 377max) Watt * -42%
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop), R7 2700X (239 fps, Idle: 69.8 W)
326.6 (313min - 351max) Watt * -32%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R9 3900X (Idle: 85.5 W)
322.8 (309min - 347max) Watt * -30%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R9 3900X (Idle: 86.7 W)
312 (306min - 328max) Watt * -26%
Sapphire NITRO+ RX 570 8 GB
Radeon RX 570, R7 2700X (Idle: 72.61 W)
308.9 (301min - 338max) Watt * -25%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R9 3900X (Idle: 77.9 W)
297.3 (292min - 316max) Watt * -20%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X (Idle: 74.66 W)
295.2 (148min - 331max) Watt * -19%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop), R7 2700X (237 fps, Idle: 77.12 W)
281.4 (275min - 321max) Watt * -14%
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700 (Desktop), R7 2700X (207 fps, Idle: 64.5 W)
280.5 (271min - 312max) Watt * -13%
PNY GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop), R9 3900X (Idle: 79.88 W)
247.8 (242min - 282max) Watt *
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X (Idle: 68.3 W)
233.2 (226min - 250max) Watt * +6%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R9 3900X (Idle: 82.4 W)
202.5 (200min - 213max) Watt * +18%
Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop), R7 2700X (Idle: 64.63 W, Idle: 64.63 W)
183 (178min - 187max) Watt * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Pros

+ powerful enough for 1080p gaming
+ adequate cooler
+ compact enough for small PC builds
+ high boost clock
+ moderate power consumption
+ reasonably priced

Cons

- single fan runs loud under load
- hardly any overclocking potential
- lower performance per watt than the GTX 1660 Ti

Verdict - An affordable and compact alternative for 1080p gaming

The PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC Desktop GPU review
The PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC Desktop GPU review

Anyone who has a budget of around 250 Euros (~$276) for a new graphics card will stumble upon a GeForce GTX 1660 sooner or later. The PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC can handle all modern titles in at least 1080p and at maximum graphics. While the card is capable of playing some games like FIFA 20 at 2160p, the GTX 1660 offers worse performance per watt than the GTX 1660 Ti. This is to be expected though, as the two cards share the same TDP, but the GTX 1660 Ti has the edge in many other specifications.

The PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC costs approximately 225 Euros (~$249) at the time of writing, and it should fit in most compact PC builds. Its 6 GB of VRAM does not hold the card back either, as our review unit held its own against the AMD Radeon RX 570, which has an additional 2 GB of VRAM.

If you are undecided about the XLR8 Gaming OC, then it is worth keeping in mind that the card is not the quietest on the market. We can even hear our review unit whirring away in a closed case, so we would recommend buying a dual-fan version if you are intent on having a quiet build.

The PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC offers excellent value for money. However, it falls short of the performance per watt that the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers.

Overall, we liked the performance that the PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC offers. NVIDIA almost has a free run currently as AMD has not brought any new affordable GPUs to market. While this may change soon, Polaris cards remain the only alternatives to NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 16 series. AMD has its Radeon RX 5700 series, but these are priced in a different league to the GTX 16 series and are designed for 1440p gaming.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 benchmarks (vendor agnostic)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
6.4 pt (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 5871     avg: 6002     median: 6013.5 (17%)     max: 6109 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 5422     avg: 5462     median: 5461.5 (14%)     max: 5502 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 470072     avg: 527165     median: 524782 (59%)     max: 589024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 224717     avg: 239475     median: 240380 (31%)     max: 252423 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 45665     avg: 51483     median: 51727.5 (55%)     max: 56812 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 74505     avg: 79816     median: 80889 (21%)     max: 82980 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 12524     avg: 12869     median: 12883.5 (23%)     max: 13184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 13569     avg: 13992     median: 14055 (16%)     max: 14287 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 276485     avg: 297810     median: 298872 (36%)     max: 317008 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 19912     avg: 21218     median: 21492 (30%)     max: 22250 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 20696     avg: 21074     median: 21131 (18%)     max: 21396 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 57895     avg: 67040     median: 71229 (21%)     max: 71996 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 55116     avg: 61609     median: 64718 (37%)     max: 64993 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 53031     avg: 76129     median: 85619 (94%)     max: 89738 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 43633     avg: 58692     median: 65295 (85%)     max: 67147 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 63.8     avg: 64.5     median: 64.2 (21%)     max: 65.5 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 43.33     avg: 54     median: 49.3 (12%)     max: 69.3 fps
specvp12 snx-02 +
specvp12 showcase-01 +
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 21.41     avg: 28.2     median: 27.1 (7%)     max: 36 fps
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 85.3     avg: 112.1     median: 120 (33%)     max: 131 fps
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 2.2     avg: 4.8     median: 5.8 (5%)     max: 6.31 fps
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 27.36     avg: 38     median: 40.4 (16%)     max: 46.1 fps
specvp12 catia-04 +
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 106.4     avg: 131.1     median: 134 (23%)     max: 153 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 60.8     avg: 78.1     median: 71.5 (19%)     max: 102 fps
specvp13 snx-03 +
specvp13 showcase-02 +
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 27.66     avg: 36.2     median: 40.4 (8%)     max: 40.5 fps
specvp13 maya-05 +
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 2.88     avg: 7.6     median: 9.9 (3%)     max: 9.93 fps
specvp13 creo-02 +
specvp13 catia-05 +
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k +
specvp2020 snx-04 4k +
specvp2020 medical-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
min: 6.12     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (6%)     max: 7.48 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 4k +
specvp2020 energy-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
min: 12.5     avg: 12.5     median: 12.5 (3%)     max: 12.51 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
min: 51.2     avg: 53.2     median: 53.2 (25%)     max: 55.2 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
min: 19.02     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (12%)     max: 19.2 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k +
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
min: 42.91     avg: 44.2     median: 44.2 (18%)     max: 45.5 fps
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.26
log 22. 03:29:50

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:16:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 getting avg benchmarks for device 9965 +0.019s ... 0.02s

#4 got single benchmarks 9965 +0.015s ... 0.036s

#5 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#6 min, max, avg, median took s +0.858s ... 0.893s

#7 return log +0s ... 0.893s

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Ready or Not

Ready or Not

2023
low 1920x1080
138.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
113.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
107.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
63.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
35.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
10.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Finals

The Finals

2023
low 1920x1080
153.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
109.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
95.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
70.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
42  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
16.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
249
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
36  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
21  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
69
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023

2023
low 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Preset 1280x720
120
EA Sports WRC

EA Sports WRC

2023
low 1920x1080
76.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
27.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
12.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset LowAA 1280x720
176.3
Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2

2023
low 1920x1080
37.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
31.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
9.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
59.6
Lords of the Fallen

Lords of the Fallen

2023
low 1920x1080
50.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
40.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
29.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
4.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
81.6
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
209.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
65.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
374.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
74  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
63  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
48  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (Adaptive Quality Off) 1280x720
111
EA Sports FC 24

EA Sports FC 24

2023
low 1920x1080
166.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
156.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
130  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
107.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
77.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
276
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

2023
low 1920x1080
271  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
223  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
132.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
81.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
62.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
31.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
316
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
71.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
56.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
43.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
26.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (FSR off) 1280x720
116.3
Steam Deck 1280x720
126
Lies of P

Lies of P

2023
low 1920x1080
106.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
77.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
68.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
24.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
177.1
Starfield

Starfield

2023
low 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
32.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
23.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
18.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
50.1
low 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
80.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
74.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
54.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
60.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
119.4
low 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
26.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
19.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
12.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 1280x720
55.3
low 1920x1080
82.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
78.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
72.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
62.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
20  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
141.7
low 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
54.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
30.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
99.7
low 1920x1080
59.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
13.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
83.2
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
179.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
159.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
109.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
78.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
57  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset TAA 1280x720
317
Diablo 4

Diablo 4

2023
low 1920x1080
141.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
122.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
107.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
89.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
29.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
256
low 1920x1080
48.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
41  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
10.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
86.5
Dead Island 2

Dead Island 2

2023
low 1920x1080
156.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
135.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
92.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
43.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
265
The Last of Us

The Last of Us

2023
low 1920x1080
59.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
38.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
31.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
18.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
93.7
low 1920x1080
78.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
54.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
49.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
42.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
29.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
11.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1280x720
125.3
low 1920x1080
116.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
96.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
74  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
73.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
52.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
29.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1280x720
201.1
low 1920x1080
67.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
47.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
47.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 1280x720
97.6
low 1920x1080
111.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
83.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
48.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
38.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
14.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
174.9
Returnal

Returnal

2023
low 1920x1080
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
44  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
81
low 1920x1080
78.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
45.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
35.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
24.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
12.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset Low TAA 1280x720
127.4
low 1920x1080
51.7 51.7 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48.4 48.4 ~ 48 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.1 42.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
41.8 41.8 ~ 42 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
27 27 ~ 27 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1280x720
84
84
low 1920x1080
123.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
92.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
78  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
63.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
44.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
23.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset / Off 1280x720
210
low 1920x1080
157.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
89.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
72.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
57.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
34.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
14.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
247
low 1920x1080
92.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
67.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
30.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
12.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (without FSR Upscaling) 1280x720
148.5
Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) + Full Ray-Tracing 1920x1080
8
low 1920x1080
97.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
85.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
53.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
31.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
147.3
low 1920x1080
85.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
74.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
72.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
62.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
17.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Preset 1280x720
124.6
low 1920x1080
85  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
75  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
35  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Basic Quality Preset T2X SMAA 1280x720
130
low 1920x1080
55.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
52.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
25  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
9.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
76.5
low 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
27.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
10  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
95.6
FIFA 23

FIFA 23

2022
low 1920x1080
185.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
174.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
117  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
114.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
83.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
47.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Rendering Quality 1280x720
295
low 1920x1080
89.4 91 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
66.8 68.1 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
54.3 54.9 ~ 55 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32.9 39.9 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
15.1 22 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
5.3 6.8 ~ 6 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
136.8
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
176.4 187 ~ 182 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
156.1 167.6 ~ 162 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
112.1 121.3 ~ 117 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81.3 91.6 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
59.5 65.8 ~ 63 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
32.7 35.6 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset 16xAF TAA 1280x720
299
323
low 1920x1080
216  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
115.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
107.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
68.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
29.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
352
low 1920x1080
84.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
83.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
83.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
82.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
51.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
22.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Settings 1280x720
148.8
Highest Settings + Maximum Ray Tracing 1920x1080
13.9
low 1920x1080
108 117.1 120.4 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.9 92.9 94.3 ~ 91 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.8 61.6 63.4 ~ 62 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.8 47.9 49.1 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
32.3 33 33.1 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
11.9 12 12.9 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset (DX12) 1280x720
202
235
low 1920x1080
69 73.9 ~ 71 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
54.6 61.4 ~ 58 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
46.4 47.9 ~ 47 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
39.1 41.4 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
22.8 24.6 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
9.6 10.1 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
80.3
110.9
Elex 2

Elex 2

2022
low 1920x1080
65.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
46.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
17.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low / Off 1280x720
84.2
low 1920x1080
165.1 168.2 215 ~ 183 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
120.9 129.6 158.8 ~ 136 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
99.9 106 122.9 ~ 110 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
70.6 78.1 88.5 ~ 79 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.4 59.9 65.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
30.2 31.4 37.1 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
221.2
297
low 1920x1080
59.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
59.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
59.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
54.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
41.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
24.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1920x1080
51  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
39.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
32.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
21.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
10.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Additional Benchmarks
Low Quality 1280x720
78.8
low 1920x1080
102  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
95  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Low Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality) 1280x720
205
low 1920x1080
73.3 83.7 85.9 ~ 81 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
60.2 70 70.2 ~ 67 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
47 53.7 54 ~ 52 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
32 36.2 36.3 ~ 35 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
27.5 28.7 29 ~ 28 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
18.3 18.6 18.7 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1280x720
111
121.2
med. 1920x1080
74.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
67.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
69.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
49.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
89.2
low 1280x720
288  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
154  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
68.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
40.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
262
low 1280x720
142  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
79.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
66.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
58.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
42.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
22.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
93.5
low 1280x720
185 201 216 ~ 201 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92 100 106 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82 88 92 ~ 87 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42 42 42 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33 35 36 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22 24 24 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
116
131
low 1280x720
89.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
80.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
62.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
40.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
21.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
92.9
low 1280x720
149  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
20  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
105
low 1280x720
128  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
86
med. 1920x1080
140  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
124  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
113  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
71.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
34.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
199
199
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
153 155.6 158.1 ~ 156 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
85 88.1 88.9 ~ 87 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
75.5 76.5 77 ~ 76 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
64.8 64.9 66 ~ 65 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
12.2 43.3 46 ~ 34 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
1 1 7 ~ 3 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Graphics Quality 1920x1080
99
105.1
med. 1920x1080
92.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
88.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
85.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
60  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
97
New World

New World

2021
low 1280x720
143  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
71.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
65  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
36.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
25.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Video Quality 1920x1080
90.9
Deathloop

Deathloop

2021
low 1280x720
117  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
74.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
60.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
33.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
16.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
95.1
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
327 385 389 ~ 367 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
169 185.4 187.5 ~ 181 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
137 147.7 149 ~ 145 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
95.3 100.2 102 ~ 99 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
72.4 75.4 75.9 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.1 42.2 43.2 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
143  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
125  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
75.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
144
Days Gone

Days Gone

2021
low 1280x720
156  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
90.3 90.3 ~ 90 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
80.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
42.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
23.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
111
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
94.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
47.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
259  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
110  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
99.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
86.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
56  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
27.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Prioritize Performance Preset 1920x1080
177
Outriders

Outriders

2021
low 1280x720
183  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
99.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
80.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
68.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
44.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
30.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
low 1280x720
195  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
110  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
86  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
57  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
97.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
51.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
42.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
36.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
22.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
9.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
62.9
low 1280x720
96  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
58  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
45  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
36  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
110  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
68.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
66.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
39  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
19  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
151  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
91.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
52.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
36.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings + Ultra Ray Tracing 1920x1080
20.5
low 1280x720
110  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
27  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
151  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
78.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
25.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
77.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
65.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
19.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
12  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12) 1920x1080
11.2
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
231  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
227  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
214  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
214  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
187  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
120  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
389  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
203  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
172  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
157  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
103  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
57.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
135.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
42.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
141.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
81.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
68  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
38.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
24.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
212  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
94.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
51.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
40.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
28.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
16.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
84.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
49.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
18.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
10.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
130  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
54  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
138  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
86.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
77.6  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
28.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
292 339 356 ~ 329 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
160 171.5 179.9 ~ 170 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
128 135.1 140.3 ~ 134 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
89.8 93.3 95.9 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
66.1 67 69.1 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
37.2 37.5 37.9 ~ 38 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
324.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
306.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
287.1  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
226.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
125.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
297.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
141.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
61.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
43  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
257  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
138  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
71.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
211  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
82.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
64.8  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
39.7  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
121  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
121  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79.2  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
130  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
49.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
30.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
24.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
81  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
53.1  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
26.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
111  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
89  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
49.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
159  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
112  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
90  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
79  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
56.8  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 1920x1080
56.2
Maximum Settings with Raytracing T2X Filmic SMAA 3840x2160
12.6
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
160  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
119  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
97  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51.4  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
31.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
114  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
73  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
67  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
34  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
17  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
265  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
262  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
241  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
239  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
202  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
127  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
143 219 226 ~ 196 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
91 98.1 99.7 ~ 96 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
61 64.4 65.1 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
49 49 49.3 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
33.6 33.8 34 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14 15 15.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Very Low Overall Quality (DX11) 1920x1080
152.1
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
198  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
70  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
52.5  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
31.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
15.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12) 1920x1080
16.8
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
261  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
142  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
64  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
38  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
237.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
98.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
60.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
42  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
25.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
168  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
71  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
45.3  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
94  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
69  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
34.9  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
23.6  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
14  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
185  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
103  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
82  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
59  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
40  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
132 166 172 ~ 157 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
92 95 98 ~ 95 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
87 89 91 ~ 89 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
80 82 85 ~ 82 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
58 59 60 ~ 59 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
31 31 32 ~ 31 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
118 156.3 165.7 ~ 147 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
61 73.8 76 ~ 70 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
45 54.3 56.1 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38 42.9 44.1 ~ 42 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
29 33.1 33.9 ~ 32 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
19 20 20.2 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
144  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
144  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
114  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
111  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
77  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
43.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
196  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
115  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
96  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
83  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
54.5  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
242  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
190  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
153  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
116  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
80  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
41.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
200  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
132  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
123  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
98  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
76  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
50  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
152 228 233 ~ 204 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
92 93.2 94.1 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
80 81.6 82.4 ~ 81 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
72 73.8 74.4 ~ 73 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
47 48.4 49.3 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
23 24.1 24.3 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Lowest Preset 1920x1080
155.5
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
313 320 334 ~ 322 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
129 131.5 132.7 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
105 109.5 110.1 ~ 108 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
88.1 95 96.1 ~ 93 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
63.7 66.7 67.8 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
34.5 35.6 36 ~ 35 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
142 191 195 ~ 176 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
95 100 102 ~ 99 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
87 92 93 ~ 91 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
82 86 87 ~ 85 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
QHD 2560x1440
57 59 59 ~ 58 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset TAA 1920x1080
116
low 1280x720
127 211 233 ~ 190 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
114 180.5 203 ~ 166 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
93 144.9 154.9 ~ 131 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
79 106.5 109.3 ~ 98 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
157.2 159.8 ~ 159 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
79.7 80.4 ~ 80 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
56.1 56.6 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
41.2 41.4 ~ 41 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
22.6 23.4 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
249  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
249  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
183  fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
129  fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
81  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
249
low 1280x720
163.7 296.4 297.7 ~ 253 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
152.4 257.8 260.5 ~ 224 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
145.9 219.2 222.4 ~ 196 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
136.7 197.2 200.9 ~ 178 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
85.9 86.5 86.8 ~ 86 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
282 296 306 ~ 295 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1366x768
181 186.5 193.2 ~ 187 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
99 101.6 103.1 ~ 101 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
55.5 56.7 58.6 ~ 57 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
4K 3840x2160
34.9 35.4 36.3 ~ 36 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) 3840x2160
23.9
25
Medium Graphics & Postprocessing 1920x1080
121.1
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
188  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
187.5 187.7 ~ 188 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
153.4 157.4 ~ 155 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
74.6 75.6 ~ 75 fps    + Compare
QHD 2560x1440
51.4 51.8 ~ 52 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
49.1 49.3 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
Additional Benchmarks
Highest Settings possible 16xAF 4xMSAA + FXAA 3840x2160
24
24
Normal/Off 4xAF 1920x1080
187.5
187.7
Lowest Settings possible 1920x1080
187.5
187.8
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ready or Not138.8113.7107.663.735.310.9
The Finals153.7109.795.870.14216.3
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora504436272116
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023716547453017
EA Sports WRC76.15550.847.127.812.9
Alan Wake 237.731.729.117.39.2
Lords of the Fallen50.840.729.519.7134.9
Total War Pharaoh209.8144.282.865.943.521.1
Assassin's Creed Mirage746763483519
EA Sports FC 24166.9156.7130107.277.923.8
Counter-Strike 2271223132.581.262.331.3
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty71.956.447.743.126.111.2
Lies of P106.69277.168.333.324.9
Starfield38.432.826.223.518.611.3
Armored Core 610380.974.154.860.518.9
Immortals of Aveum32.126.619.912.6
Atlas Fallen82.478.172.862.141.820
Baldur's Gate 367.754.645.24530.115.7
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart59.649.336.431.921.613.5
F1 23179.9159.5109.378.65729.4
Diablo 4141.5122.3107.889.157.329.1
Star Wars Jedi Survivor48.44138.636.122.210.2
Dead Island 2156.4135.192.367.743.418.2
The Last of Us59.747.138.931.618.9
Resident Evil 4 Remake78.454.249.342.229.511.8
Company of Heroes 3116.996.97473.752.529.2
Sons of the Forest67.251.247.647.133.218.1
Atomic Heart111.483.448.538.428.114.8
Returnal605851443216
Hogwarts Legacy78.95945.535.724.312.8
Dead Space Remake5248424227
The Witcher 3 v4.00123.592.97863.944.223.8
High On Life157.389.972.657.634.814.3
The Callisto Protocol92.867.442.642.730.112.6
Need for Speed Unbound97.785.867.853.731.916.5
Spider-Man Miles Morales85.174.272.262.34117.3
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022857555503521
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection55.152.140.539259.36
A Plague Tale Requiem67.75036.627.3199.97
FIFA 23185.2174.1117114.983.447.2
The Quarry90675536196
F1 22182162117866334
Vampire Bloodhunt216115.7111107.268.429.6
Ghostwire Tokyo84.183.883.182.251.622.3
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands1159162483312
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6715847402410
Elex 265.359.551.846.733.117.4
GRID Legends183136110796033
Elden Ring59.959.859.554.941.824.3
Dying Light 25139.132.121.810.7
Rainbow Six Extraction1029795774721
God of War816752352819
Halo Infinite74.667.76869.649.3
Farming Simulator 222881541149268.340.9
Battlefield 204214279.466.558.642.322.6
Forza Horizon 52019987423523
Call of Duty Vanguard89.880.562.755.840.121.6
Riders Republic1498668594020
Guardians of the Galaxy1288380775428
Back 4 Blood14012411371.234.6
Far Cry 6156877665343
Alan Wake Remastered92.688.285.960
New World14371.16555.436.825.2
Deathloop11774.260.14933.516.8
F1 2021367181145997542
Monster Hunter Stories 214414414312575.1
Days Gone1569080.659.342.123.3
Mass Effect Legendary Edition11411294.647.9
Resident Evil Village25911099.686.65627.8
Outriders18399.580.868.344.830.3
Hitman 319511093865731
Cyberpunk 2077 1.097.651.942.636.622.39.55
Immortals Fenyx Rising965849453621
Yakuza Like a Dragon11068.966.8593919
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War15191.77052.536.82.01
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla1105942372715
Dirt 515178.660.75040.825.7
Watch Dogs Legion11477.965.929.419.412
FIFA 21231227214214187120
Star Wars Squadrons38920317215710357.8
Mafia Definitive Edition135.970.664.942.721.8
Serious Sam 4141.581.46850.538.824.4
Crysis Remastered21294.351.440.828.916.6
Flight Simulator 202084.649.935.823.718.410.4
Horizon Zero Dawn1308267544021
Death Stranding13886.779.377.653.328.6
F1 2020329170134936738
Valorant324.5306.2287.1226.3125.3
Gears Tactics297.9141.79261.94322.8
Doom Eternal25713812111571.738.2
Hunt Showdown21182.164.839.719.8
Escape from Tarkov12112193.279.247.623.9
Red Dead Redemption 21307349.130.924.7
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order112908153.126.4
Need for Speed Heat11189797049.523
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019159112907956.831.6
GRID 2019160119976751.431.9
Ghost Recon Breakpoint1147367493417
FIFA 20265262241239202127
Borderlands 31969664493415
Control1987052.531.615.8
F1 2019261142123826438
Total War: Three Kingdoms237.898.260.64225.8
Rage 216883717145.321.7
Anno 180094926934.923.614
The Division 218510382594021
Far Cry New Dawn1579589825931
Metro Exodus1477052423220
Apex Legends1441441141117743.6
Darksiders III196115968354.518.8
Farming Simulator 192421901531168041.9
Forza Horizon 4200132123987650
Shadow of the Tomb Raider2049381734824
Strange Brigade322131108936635
Far Cry 51769991855830
X-Plane 11.1119016613198
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark15980564123
Rocket League24924918312981
Dota 2 Reborn25322419617886
The Witcher 32951871015736
GTA V188188155755249
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

12
38
67

25
63
31
4
33
65
18
7
50
49
4
28
64
21
5
83
25
5
3

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 22. 03:29:56

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:16:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 before gaming benchmark output +0.001s ... 0.003s

#4 Got 918 rows for game benchmarks. +0.082s ... 0.085s

#5 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.085s

#6 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.08s ... 0.165s

#7 benchmarks composed for output. +5.976s ... 6.141s

#8 return log +0.009s ... 6.15s

static version load dynamic
Loading comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > PNY GeForce GTX 1660 XLR8 Gaming OC Graphics Card Review: A small GPU for compact PCs
Sebastian Bade, 2019-11-19 (Update: 2021-03-12)