Alone in the Dark (2024) in review: Laptop and desktop benchmarks
Test systems
We ran our gaming benchmarks on these devices. Clicking on the various images will take you to the respective producer's website. Further details on the devices' specifications are listed at the end of the article.
Tech
If press and user evaluations are any indication, the 2024 edition of Alone in the Dark does not appear to be a slam dunk in terms of content or an absolute flyer. While the atmosphere, characters, plot, and riddles are all realistic, the fighting sequences and overall horror/survival vibe aren't quite perfect.
Technically, the title is based on the extremely successful Unreal Engine 4, offering more than solid visuals. Although it sometimes takes a while, especially on weaker computers, for the textures to load correctly, the level of detail and sharpness of the environments are otherwise very pleasing. However, we encountered one or two inconsistencies during testing. The fact that the game takes a while to start can still be tolerated. The developers should work on the phenomenon where there are often strange fluctuations in performance between benchmark runs. To obtain a comprehensible GPU ranking, we sometimes had to run measurements twice or three times, with average values then calculated.
There is hardly anything to criticize about the graphics menu. In addition to the picture mode and resolution, you can activate upscaling in the form of FSR or DLSS in the upper area and optionally use DLAA. V-Sync and an FPS lock are also available upon request. There are also 5 presets that affect more than 10 individual settings. The highest level, called Cinematic, which was used for many measurements, is significantly more demanding than Epic, without any major visual differences being recognizable.
Nevertheless, users will be lacking useful comparison graphics and ray tracing, which are features seen in a lot of Ubisoft titles. On the other hand, setting changes are applied without restarting the game.
Benchmark
The greenhouse, which you encounter early after starting the game, serves as a benchmark scene. As demonstrated in the video below, we used the CapFrameX tool to capture a set route in slightly under 20 seconds. A playable frame rate ranges between 30 and 40 frames per second.
Results
FHD (1,920 x 1,080)
The Intel Arc 8 introduces a new and relatively powerful iGPU to our typical test setups. Similar to the Radeon 780M, this entry-level chip supports 1,920 x 1,080 pixels and the High preset. A GeForce RTX 4050 or above is recommended for optimum detail in Full HD.
Alone in the Dark | |
1920x1080 Low Preset 1920x1080 Medium Preset 1920x1080 High Preset 1920x1080 Cinematic Preset | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K | |
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS | |
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H | |
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU, Ultra 7 155H | |
AMD Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS |
QHD (2,560 x 1,440)
For QHD monitors, an upper-mid-range representative would be ideal. Both the GeForce GeForce RTX 4060 and the Radeon RX 7600S can handle the Cinematic preset efficiently.
Alone in the Dark | |
2560x1440 Cinematic Preset | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K | |
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS | |
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H |
UHD (3,840 x 2,160)
Even the absolute best models begin to sweat at 4K resolution. When it comes to notebook GPUs, only the GeForce RTX 4090 currently produces enough frames to display full details on the screen without upscaling. You can start with a GeForce RTX 4070, which includes DLSS or FSR (quality).
Alone in the Dark | |
3840x2160 Cinematic Preset 3840x2160 Cinematic Preset + Quality DLSS 3840x2160 Cinematic Preset + Quality FSR | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K | |
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, i9-13900K | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS | |
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS | |
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H |
Overview
Test system details
Notebook | Graphics card | Processor | RAM |
---|---|---|---|
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @150 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6X) | Intel Core i9-13900H | 2 x 16 GB DDR5 |
Razer Blade 16 Mid 23 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 @175 W TGP (12 GB GDDR6X) | Intel Core i9-13950HX | 2 x 16 GB DDR5 |
XMG Pro 15 E23 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) | Intel Core i9-13900HX | 2 x 16 GB DDR5 |
Razer Blade 14 Mid 23 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | 2 x 8 GB DDR5 |
Medion Erazer Scout E20 | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 @100 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) | Intel Core i7-13700H | 2 x 8 GB DDR5 |
Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | AMD Radeon RX 7600S (8 GB GDDR6) & AMD Radeon 780M | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | 2 x 8 GB DDR5 |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14 | Intel Arc 8 | Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | 2 x 16 GB DDR5 |
Tower PC | Graphics card | Processor | RAM |
---|---|---|---|
Asus ROG Strix Z790-F | Nvidia GeForce RTX 4080 (16 GB GDDR6X) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (20 GB GDDR6) |
Intel Core i9-13900K | 2 x 24 GB DDR5 G.Skill |
4K monitor | Operating system | Nvidia driver | AMD driver | Intel driver |
---|---|---|---|---|
Philips Evnia 42M2N8900 | Windows 11 | 551.86 | 24.3.1 | 101.5379 |