Schenker XMG Core 17 (Tongfang GK7MRFR) in review: Mid-range gaming laptop without hot flashes

Solid. The hardware of the Schenker XMG Core 17 brings all modern computer games smoothly onto the 17.3-inch screen (Full HD, IPS, 144 Hz). The laptop also scores points with moderate heat development, low noise development in everyday use, and room for two SSDs.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Brian Burriston (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), Published 12/23/2020 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

The Schenker XMG Core 17 is a mid-range gaming laptop. The review sample provided to us is powered by a Core i7-10750H processor and a GeForce GTX 1650 Ti graphics core. Alternatively, the laptop is available with a GeForce RTX 2060 Refresh GPU. Competitors include devices like the Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05, the Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54, the MSI GF75 Thin SDR, and the Nexoc GH7 716IG.

Since the 2020 Core 17 is identical in construction to the 2019 model, we won't go further into the case, the connectivity, the input devices, and the speakers. The corresponding information can be found in the review of the Schenker XMG Core 17 (2019).

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake

Processor

Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 75 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1485 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 50 W TDP, GDDR6, 27.21.14.6089 (Nvidia 460.89), Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4-3200, dual-channel mode, two memory slots, both in use

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE HF NV173FHM-N44, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM470

Storage

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB

, 880 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC274 @ Intel Comet Point-H PCH - cAVS

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: mic in, headset out, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 395.7 x 260.8 ( = 1.18 x 15.58 x 10.27 in)

Battery

62.3 Wh, 4100 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 15.2 V

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, USB stick (drivers), some stickers, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.5 kg ( = 88.19 oz / 5.51 pounds), Power Supply: 408 g ( = 14.39 oz / 0.9 pounds)

Price

1 Euro

Links

Schenker homepage
Schenker notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
81.4 %	12/2020	Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	2.5 kg	30 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
81.9 %	10/2020	Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	2.9 kg	26.2 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
83.6 %	10/2020	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.8 kg	25 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
79.8 %	10/2020	MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	2.2 kg	23 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
81.5 %	09/2020	Nexoc GH7 716IG i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	2.5 kg	29.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Size comparison

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Nexoc GH7 716IG Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR DIN A4 ❌

Connectivity

Left side: Slot for a cable lock, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 2.0 (Type-A), microphone input, headphone output

Right side: Memory card reader (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A)

Back: 2x Mini DisplayPort, HDMI, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-C), power supply

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (48.5 - 209, n=91, last 2 years)	105.6 MB/s ∼100% +322%
Nexoc GH7 716IG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	82 MB/s ∼78% +228%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	80 MB/s ∼76% +220%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25 MB/s ∼24% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25 MB/s ∼24%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (72 - 269, n=82, last 2 years)	129.1 MB/s ∼100% +397%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	88 MB/s ∼68% +238%
Nexoc GH7 716IG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	86 MB/s ∼67% +231%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	27 MB/s ∼21% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26 MB/s ∼20%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1340 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
Nexoc GH7 716IG Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1290 MBit/s ∼96% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1230 MBit/s ∼92%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s ∼87% -6%
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1580, n=70, last 2 years)	1128 MBit/s ∼84% -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1050 MBit/s ∼78% -15%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1040 MBit/s ∼78% -15%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	670 MBit/s ∼50% -46%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nexoc GH7 716IG Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1560 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1450 MBit/s ∼93%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1420 MBit/s ∼91% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1390 MBit/s ∼89% -4%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s ∼81% -13%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1180 MBit/s ∼76% -19%
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1700, n=70, last 2 years)	1175 MBit/s ∼75% -19%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	689 MBit/s ∼44% -52%

ColorChecker Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake: 23.82 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 36.35 ∆E

Display - 144 Hz IPS

The brightness (297.8 cd/m²) and contrast (1,086:1) of the matte 17.3-inch display (1920x1080 pixels) are okay. Furthermore, the 144 Hz panel has good response times overall. The display flickers at a frequency of 1,000 Hz at brightness levels of 99% and below.


297 cd/m²	301 cd/m²	294 cd/m²
308 cd/m²	315 cd/m²	294 cd/m²
300 cd/m²	293 cd/m²	278 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE HF NV173FHM-N44

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 315 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 297.8 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 315 cd/m²
Contrast: 1086:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 2.29
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.084

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake BOE HF NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Schenker XMG Core 17 LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 AU Optronics B173HAN04.3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR B173HAN04.9 (AUO978F), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Nexoc GH7 716IG LG Philips LGD0615, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		0%	6%	-2%	-37%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	65.3	64.4 -1%	69.4 6%	62.6 -4%	39.98 -39%	64.6 -1%
sRGB Coverage	92.6	95.6 3%	97.1 5%	94.3 2%	59.9 -35%	95.8 3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.5	65.6 -1%	71.2 7%	64.7 -3%	41.31 -38%	65.7 -1%
Response Times		11%	-149%	783%	-147%	14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2)	14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) 18%	38.4 ?(19.6, 18.8) -118%	16.4 ?(8, 8.4) 7%	38.4 ?(18, 20.4) -118%	15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6) 14%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(5.2, 4.8)	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 4%	28 ?(15.6, 12.4) -180%	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2) -8%	27.6 ?(14.8, 12.8) -176%	8.6 ?(4.8, 3.8) 14%
PWM Frequency	1000 ?(99)			24510 ?(19) 2351%
Screen		9%	1%	32%	-27%	0%
Brightness middle	315	329 4%	326 3%	322 2%	252 -20%	303 -4%
Brightness	298	286 -4%	304 2%	308 3%	253 -15%	277 -7%
Brightness Distribution	88	79 -10%	89 1%	92 5%	92 5%	86 -2%
Black Level *	0.29	0.3 -3%	0.25 14%	0.18 38%	0.23 21%	0.25 14%
Contrast	1086	1097 1%	1304 20%	1789 65%	1096 1%	1212 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.3	2.52 41%	4.42 -3%	1.53 64%	4.24 1%	4.15 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.3	6.9 5%	9.44 -29%	3.14 57%	21.4 -193%	10.52 -44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.29	1.31 43%	1.53 33%	0.74 68%	3.64 -59%	0.9 61%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.3	2.98 31%	5.8 -35%	1.9 56%	2.8 35%	5.38 -25%
Gamma	2.084 ^106%	2.38 ^92%	2.261 ^97%	2.144 ^103%	2.196 ^100%	2.35 ^94%
CCT	7434 ^87%	6738 ^96%	6822 ^95%	6809 ^95%	7027 ^93%	7680 ^85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	66	60 -9%	71 8%	65 -2%	41 -38%	61 -8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	92	95 3%	93 1%	87 -5%	59 -36%	96 4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		7% / 8%	-47% / -17%	271% / 159%	-70% / -44%	5% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Out of the box, the display shows a decent color reproduction. However, with a color deviation of 4.3, the target (Delta E less than 3) is not met. Moreover, the display doesn't suffer from a blue tint. Calibration reduces the color deviation to 2.29 and provides a more balanced representation of the grayscales. The AdobeRGB (66%) and sRGB (92%) color spaces are not completely reproduced.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1000 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19035 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The viewing-angle stable IPS panel can be read from any position. Outdoors, reading the display is possible under cloudy skies or in the shade.

Performance - Sufficient for all application areas

Schenker's 17.3-inch gaming laptop brings every modern game smoothly onto the screen and also cuts a fine figure in all other application areas. Our test device costs about 1,500 Euros (~$1,828). The laptop can be customized in Schenker's online store.

Test conditions

The preinstalled Control Center allows selecting a performance profile ("Balanced", "Enthusiast", "Overboost"). We performed our test under the "Enthusiast" profile and using automatic fan control. We also ran some benchmarks with the "Overboost" and "Balanced" profiles enabled, respectively. The results can be found in the comparison graphs.

Processor

The Core i7-10750H hexa-core processor (Comet Lake) operates at a base speed of 2.6 GHz. Via Turbo, the clock rate can be increased to 4.3 GHz (six cores) and up to 5 GHz (one core). Hyper-Threading (two threads per core) is supported.

The processor executes the CPU tests of the Cinebench R15 benchmark at 3.7 to 4.3 GHz (multithread) and 4.2 to 5 GHz (single-thread). On battery power, the clock rates are 3 to 3.3 GHz (multithread) and 2.5 to 3.9 GHz (single-thread), respectively.

We verify if the CPU Turbo is consistently used when plugged in by running the Cinebench R15 benchmark's multithread test in a continuous loop for at least 30 minutes. Turbo is used. Furthermore, enabling the "Overboost" profile causes an increase in Turbo speeds.

Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1200 (1187.65-1299.17)

Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H; Overboost: Ø1302 (1290.61-1312.42)

Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H; Balanced: Ø967 (956.16-1145.67)

Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø850 (539.07-902.4)

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1290 (1277.75-1322.62)

MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1154 (1143.02-1237.66)

Nexoc GH7 716IG Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1161 (1146.2-1359.85)

Schenker XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1010 (998.28-1099.87)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Overboost)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Balanced)

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1299 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

124 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

209 Points

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=241, last 2 years)	251 Points ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	209 Points ∼83%
Nexoc GH7 716IG Intel Core i7-10750H	204 Points ∼81% -2%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	198 Points ∼79% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (184 - 213, n=45)	196.7 Points ∼78% -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	195 Points ∼78% -7%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H	180 Points ∼72% -14%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	108 Points ∼43% -48%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=240, last 2 years)	2609 Points ∼100% +101%
Nexoc GH7 716IG Intel Core i7-10750H	1360 Points ∼52% +5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	1323 Points ∼51% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	1308 Points ∼50% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	1299 (1187.65^min - 1299^max) Points ∼50%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (804 - 1418, n=50)	1263 Points ∼48% -3%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	1238 (1143.02^min - 1237.66^max) Points ∼47% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Balanced)	1146 Points ∼44% -12%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H	1100 Points ∼42% -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	548 Points ∼21% -58%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	528 Seconds * ∼100% -47%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Balanced)	504 Seconds * ∼95% -41%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43)	389 Seconds * ∼74% -9%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	388 Seconds * ∼73% -8%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	358 Seconds * ∼68%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	351 Seconds * ∼66% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	333 Seconds * ∼63% +7%
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=238, last 2 years)	234 Seconds * ∼44% +35%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=235, last 2 years)	5817 MIPS ∼100% +7%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	5470 MIPS ∼94% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	5438 MIPS ∼93%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Balanced)	5381 MIPS ∼93% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	5190 MIPS ∼89% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43)	5114 MIPS ∼88% -6%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	5076 MIPS ∼87% -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	2945 MIPS ∼51% -46%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=234, last 2 years)	65912 MIPS ∼100% +79%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	37345 MIPS ∼57% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	36771 MIPS ∼56%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43)	33946 MIPS ∼52% -8%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	33456 MIPS ∼51% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	31612 MIPS ∼48% -14%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Balanced)	27352 MIPS ∼41% -26%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	15146 MIPS ∼23% -59%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=237, last 2 years)	646 Points ∼100% +32%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	492 Points ∼76% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	491 Points ∼76%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Balanced)	477 Points ∼74% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43)	473 Points ∼73% -4%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	467 Points ∼72% -5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	463 Points ∼72% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H	441 Points ∼68% -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	312 Points ∼48% -36%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=237, last 2 years)	6145 Points ∼100% +107%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	3180 Points ∼52% +7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	3144 Points ∼51% +6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	2968 Points ∼48%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43)	2848 Points ∼46% -4%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	2801 Points ∼46% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H	2434 Points ∼40% -18%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Balanced)	2088 Points ∼34% -30%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	1397 Points ∼23% -53%

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=233, last 2 years)	1689 Points ∼100% +27%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	1333 Points ∼79%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	1322 Points ∼78% -1%
Nexoc GH7 716IG Intel Core i7-10750H	1307 Points ∼77% -2%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	1301 Points ∼77% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Balanced)	1282 Points ∼76% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43)	1263 Points ∼75% -5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	1262 Points ∼75% -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	703 Points ∼42% -47%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=233, last 2 years)	11605 Points ∼100% +81%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	6451 Points ∼56% +1%
Nexoc GH7 716IG Intel Core i7-10750H	6403 Points ∼55% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	6394 Points ∼55%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	6358 Points ∼55% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	6349 Points ∼55% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43)	6135 Points ∼53% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Balanced)	4775 Points ∼41% -25%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	2783 Points ∼24% -56%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=238, last 2 years)	18.2 fps ∼100% +78%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	11 fps ∼60% +8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	10.4 fps ∼57% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	10.2 fps ∼56%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)	9.61 fps ∼53% -6%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	9.45 fps ∼52% -7%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Balanced)	7.41 fps ∼41% -27%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	6.13 fps ∼34% -40%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	94 s * ∼100% -74%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	54.3 s * ∼58% -0%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	54.1 s * ∼58% -0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	54.1 s * ∼58%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)	53.3 s * ∼57% +1%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=234, last 2 years)	50.8 s * ∼54% +6%
Nexoc GH7 716IG Intel Core i7-10750H	47.5 s * ∼51% +12%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	45.7 s * ∼49% +16%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H	1.088 sec * ∼100% -88%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H	0.615 sec * ∼57% -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.614 sec * ∼56% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)	0.611 sec * ∼56% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Balanced)	0.605 sec * ∼56% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	0.579 sec * ∼53% -0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	0.578 sec * ∼53%
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=234, last 2 years)	0.503 sec * ∼46% +13%

* ... smaller is better

System performance

The system works well and smoothly. The laptop offers enough computing power for all common application areas - gaming, video-editing, image-processing, office tasks, and Internet usage don't pose any problems for the hardware. This is complemented by good results in the PCMark benchmarks.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4136 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5002 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5610 points
PCMark 10 Score		5185 points
Help

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=193, last 2 years)	7268 Points ∼100% +40%
Schenker XMG Core 17 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5657 Points ∼78% +9%
Nexoc GH7 716IG GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5594 Points ∼77% +8%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU	5441 Points ∼75% +5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5185 Points ∼71%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (4837 - 5466, n=3)	5163 Points ∼71% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	5109 Points ∼70% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B	4077 Points ∼56% -21%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (3570 - 6657, n=41, last 2 years)	5107 Points ∼100% +23%
Schenker XMG Core 17 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	4401 Points ∼86% +6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	4291 Points ∼84% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (4090 - 4420, n=3)	4215 Points ∼83% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	4136 Points ∼81%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B	3181 Points ∼62% -23%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4622 - 7085, n=40, last 2 years)	6003 Points ∼100% +7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	5817 Points ∼97% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5697 Points ∼95% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5610 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (5343 - 5610, n=3)	5513 Points ∼92% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B	4265 Points ∼71% -24%

DPC latencies

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B	1688 μs * ∼100% -69%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU	1212 μs * ∼72% -21%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	1000 μs * ∼59%
Nexoc GH7 716IG GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	527 μs * ∼31% +47%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	506 μs * ∼30% +49%

* ... smaller is better

Storage

An NVMe SSD (M.2 2280) from Samsung serves as system drive. It provides 1 TB of storage space and delivers very good transfer rates. In total, the laptop can accommodate two M.2 2280 SSDs (1x NVMe, 1x NVMe/SATA; RAID 0/1).

The laptop would still have room for a 2.5-inch storage medium. Since our test device is equipped with the larger of the two available batteries (46 Wh, 62 Wh), the battery takes up the space designated for the storage device.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3561 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3339 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 621 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 536 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2959 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3009 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 169.5 MB/s

	Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 SK hynix BC511 HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU	Nexoc GH7 716IG Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	Schenker XMG Core 17 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-36%	-15%	-34%	4%	-31%
Write 4K	169.5	134.7 -21%	141.9 -16%	138.8 -18%	201.6 19%	99.3 -41%
Read 4K	51.5	44.84 -13%	48.75 -5%	50.6 -2%	54.8 6%	38.47 -25%
Write Seq	3009	1053 -65%	2734 -9%	1032 -66%	2999 0%	1449 -52%
Read Seq	2959	1241 -58%	1921 -35%	1199 -59%	3023 2%	1237 -58%
Write 4K Q32T1	536	499.8 -7%	422.6 -21%	464.6 -13%	545 2%	364.4 -32%
Read 4K Q32T1	621	518 -17%	509 -18%	550 -11%	636 2%	421.9 -32%
Write Seq Q32T1	3339	1022 -69%	3055 -9%	1216 -64%	3262 -2%	3276 -2%
Read Seq Q32T1	3561	2263 -36%	3257 -9%	2275 -36%	3550 0%	3338 -6%
AS SSD		-50%	-18%	-69%	1%	-34%
Seq Read	2937	1635 -44%	2828 -4%	1976 -33%	3008 2%	2283 -22%
Seq Write	2858	913 -68%	2677 -6%	1057 -63%	2521 -12%	2779 -3%
4K Read	50.3	46.18 -8%	39.94 -21%	45.31 -10%	64.3 28%	29.99 -40%
4K Write	130.6	101.7 -22%	100.9 -23%	119.1 -9%	142.5 9%	99.1 -24%
4K-64 Read	1710	773 -55%	1562 -9%	817 -52%	1664 -3%	1156 -32%
4K-64 Write	2355	745 -68%	1867 -21%	672 -71%	2447 4%	2333 -1%
Access Time Read *	0.037	0.05 -35%		0.156 -322%	0.047 -27%	0.092 -149%
Access Time Write *	0.028	0.037 -32%	0.037 -32%	0.034 -21%	0.026 7%	0.037 -32%
Score Read	2054	983 -52%	1885 -8%	1060 -48%	2029 -1%	1414 -31%
Score Write	2771	938 -66%	2236 -19%	897 -68%	2842 3%	2710 -2%
Score Total	5873	2399 -59%	5076 -14%	2464 -58%	5893 0%	4871 -17%
Copy ISO MB/s	2225	573 -74%	1870 -16%			1394 -37%
Copy Program MB/s	779	344.4 -56%	545 -30%			379.8 -51%
Copy Game MB/s	1590	535 -66%	1083 -32%			976 -39%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-43% / -45%	-17% / -17%	-52% / -54%	3% / 2%	-33% / -33%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics card

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti graphics core (Turing) belongs to the upper GPU mid-range. It's supported by fast GDDR6 memory (4,096 MB). The 3DMark results are at a normal level for the GPU installed here. The "Overboost" profile causes a slight increase in graphics performance. Moreover, the UHD Graphics 630 GPU integrated into the processor is active, and the laptop works with Nvidia's Optimus graphics-switching solution.

3DMark 11 Performance		13280 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		33280 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9057 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3851 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)	36561 Points ∼100% +176%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	20697 Points ∼57% +56%
Nexoc GH7 716IG NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	20530 Points ∼56% +55%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	19893 Points ∼54% +50%
Schenker XMG Core 17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	19156 Points ∼52% +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (12865 - 14415, n=8)	13515 Points ∼37% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	13256 Points ∼36%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H	12726 Points ∼35% -4%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 192520, n=166, last 2 years)	121961 Points ∼100% +81%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	103797 Points ∼85% +54%
Schenker XMG Core 17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	97189 Points ∼80% +44%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	67325 Points ∼55%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H	62268 Points ∼51% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (34971 - 70377, n=7)	59364 Points ∼49% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=239, last 2 years)	27049 Points ∼100% +176%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	16408 Points ∼61% +67%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	14928 Points ∼55% +52%
Schenker XMG Core 17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	14537 Points ∼54% +48%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	10733 Points ∼40% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (9691 - 10733, n=8)	10082 Points ∼37% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	9818 Points ∼36%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H	9423 Points ∼35% -4%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=239, last 2 years)	10737 Points ∼100% +202%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	6219 Points ∼58% +75%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	5530 Points ∼52% +56%
Schenker XMG Core 17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	5464 Points ∼51% +54%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H (Overboost)	3904 Points ∼36% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (3554 - 3904, n=8)	3682 Points ∼34% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	3554 Points ∼33%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H	3455 Points ∼32% -3%

Gaming performance

The Core 17 brings all games in our database smoothly onto the screen. Full HD resolution and medium to high quality settings can usually be selected. Titles that only have low hardware requirements allow more. A current hit like Cyberpunk 2077 requires a reduction of the resolution and/or quality level. The "Overboost" profile doesn't cause an increase in frame rates.

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 217, n=237, last 2 years)	103.4 fps ∼100% +144%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	68.5 (52^min) fps ∼66% +62%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	56.6 (47^min) fps ∼55% +34%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	53.3 fps ∼52% +26%
Nexoc GH7 716IG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	52.8 (44^min) fps ∼51% +25%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	42.3 fps ∼41%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (Overboost)	42.1 fps ∼41% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	40.3 (26^min) fps ∼39% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (34.7 - 42.3, n=8)	38.9 fps ∼38% -8%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (22 - 194.7, n=250, last 2 years)	132.9 fps ∼100% +19%
Nexoc GH7 716IG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	118 (103.2^min) fps ∼89% +5%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	116 (101.7^min) fps ∼87% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	112 (99^min) fps ∼84%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (Overboost)	112 (98.9^min) fps ∼84% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (87.1 - 120, n=8)	109.4 fps ∼82% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (Balanced)	107 (93.8^min) fps ∼81% -4%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 146.4, n=254, last 2 years)	91.9 fps ∼100% +21%
Nexoc GH7 716IG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	80.5 fps ∼88% +6%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	78.4 fps ∼85% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (Overboost)	75.9 fps ∼83% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	75.7 fps ∼82%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (Balanced)	69.6 fps ∼76% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (59.1 - 75.9, n=8)	69.5 fps ∼76% -8%

Horizon Zero Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
Average of class Gaming (41 - 163, n=11, last 2 years)	107.9 fps ∼100% +151%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	62 fps ∼57% +44%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	58 (20^min) fps ∼54% +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (43 - 48, n=4)	44.3 fps ∼41% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	43 (20^min - 111^max) fps ∼40%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (Overboost)	43 (20^min - 97^max) fps ∼40% 0%

Serious Sam 4 - 1920x1080 High (DX12)
Average of class Gaming (48.9 - 109, n=12, last 2 years)	83.1 fps ∼100% +91%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	69.9 (4.75^min, 39.2^P1 - 141^max) fps ∼84% +61%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	67.1 fps ∼81% +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (43.4 - 48.2, n=2)	45.8 fps ∼55% +6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	43.4 (14.2^min, 15.3^P0.1, 24.8^P1 - 96^max) fps ∼52%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	40.6 (13.3^min, 22.9^P1 - 83.3^max) fps ∼49% -6%

Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 High Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming (33 - 131, n=20, last 2 years)	91.6 fps ∼100% +83%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (50 - 53.1, n=2)	51.6 fps ∼56% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	50 (16^min, 26^P0.1, 41^P1 - 60^max) fps ∼55%

Immortals Fenyx Rising - 1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming (50 - 101, n=5, last 2 years)	75.4 fps ∼100% +98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (38 - 46, n=2)	42 fps ∼56% +11%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	38 (22^min - 82^max) fps ∼50%

In order to verify whether the frame rates remain largely constant over a prolonged period of time, we let the game The Witcher 3 run for about 60 minutes at Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings. The character is not moved. A drop in frame rates wasn't found.