Schenker XMG Core 17 (Tongfang GM7MG0R) review: Configurable gaming laptop with a WQHD display

Successful implementation. The powerful hardware of the Schenker XMG Core 17 is able to bring all the current computer games smoothly to the responsive display (WQHD, IPS, 165 Hz, 17.3 inch). The preinstalled Control Center allows you to adjust the performance development of the CPU and GPU.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Mark Riege), Published 06/01/2021 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

With the XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Schenker is adding a gaming laptop of the upper mid-range to its offerings. The test unit provided to us is run by a Core i7-10870H processor and a GeForce RTX-3060 laptop GPU. The competitors include devices such as the MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK, the Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54, and the Medion Erazer Beast X10.

Since the build of the laptop is to a large extent identical to that of its two predecessors, we won't discuss the case, connection equipment, input devices, and speakers, except where there are differences. You can find the corresponding information on these features in our review of the XMG Core 17 (2019).

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)

Processor

Intel Core i7-10870H 8 x 2.2 - 5 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1425 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 130 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 27.21.14.6647, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

, DDR4-3200, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use), max. 64 GB

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM470

Storage

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB

, 2 M.2-2280 slots, NVMe; RAID-0 support, 883 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC274 @ Intel Comet Point-H PCH - cAVS

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: headset out, microphone in, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 30.05 x 395.7 x 260.8 ( = 1.18 x 15.58 x 10.27 in)

Battery

62 Wh, 4100 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, sticker, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.546 kg ( = 89.81 oz / 5.61 pounds), Power Supply: 428 g ( = 15.1 oz / 0.94 pounds)

Price

1814 Euro

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Possible Competitors in the Comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
83.9 %	06/2021	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	30.05 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
83.3 %	02/2021	MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M	2.6 kg	28 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
83.6 %	10/2020	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.8 kg	25 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
84.7 %	11/2020	Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.3 kg	24.6 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Size Comparison

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 DIN A4 ❌

Connections - The Schenker laptop does not offer Thunderbolt

In terms of the connections, something has changed compared to the predecessors: The two Mini-DisplayPort connections were removed, and the USB-C port now supports the USB 3.2 Gen 2 standard (before: USB 3.2 Gen 1) and also DisplayPort via USB-C.

Right side: storage card reader (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type A)

Left side: slot for a cable lock, USB 2.0 (Type A), microphone in, headphones out

Back: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type C; DisplayPort 1.4, G-Sync compatible), HDMI 2.1 (HDCP 2.3), Gigabit Ethernet, power

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 209, n=96, last 2 years)	102.9 MB/s ∼100% +457%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	77 MB/s ∼75% +317%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25 MB/s ∼24% +35%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25 MB/s ∼24% +35%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	18.46 MB/s ∼18%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (26 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)	128.6 MB/s ∼100% +526%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	86 MB/s ∼67% +319%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	27 MB/s ∼21% +31%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26 MB/s ∼20% +27%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	20.54 MB/s ∼16%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1541 (1418^min - 1606^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1340 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1230 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1180 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1580, n=47, last 2 years)	1148 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1010 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	670 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1711 (861^min - 1776^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1480 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1450 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1420 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Average of class Gaming (423 - 1700, n=47, last 2 years)	1234 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1100 MBit/s ∼64% -36%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	689 MBit/s ∼40% -60%

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1682 (861-1776)

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1541 (1418-1606)

Display - 165 Hz WQHD IPS

While the brightness value (332.7 cd/m²) of the matte 17.3-inch display (2560 x 1440 pixels) turns out good, the contrast (974:1) could use some improvement, barely missing the target (> 1000:1). The 165-Hz panel offers quick response times and does not produce any PWM flickering. Alternatively, Schenker also offers the option for an FHD display (IPS, 144 Hz).


323 cd/m²	337 cd/m²	311 cd/m²
330 cd/m²	370 cd/m²	337 cd/m²
319 cd/m²	344 cd/m²	323 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 370 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 332.7 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 370 cd/m²
Contrast: 974:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.41 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 1.19
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.57-6493 Ø6.6
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.287

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AU Optronics AUO978F, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 LG Phillips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake BOE HF NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		-41%	-6%	-4%	-4%	-5%
Display P3 Coverage	68.1	39.55 -42%	62.6 -8%	64.5 -5%	64.4 -5%	65.3 -4%
sRGB Coverage	98.5	59.2 -40%	94.3 -4%	95.6 -3%	95.6 -3%	92.6 -6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.3	40.86 -41%	64.7 -7%	65.6 -5%	65.6 -5%	66.5 -4%
Response Times		-165%	-3%	7%	9%	-3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)	40 ?(19.6, 20.4) -138%	16.4 ?(8, 8.4) 2%	14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) 14%	14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) 14%	17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2) -5%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(4.8, 5.2)	29.2 ?(15.6, 13.6) -192%	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2) -8%	10 ?(5.2, 4.8) -0%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 4%	10 ?(5.2, 4.8) -0%
PWM Frequency			24510 ?(19)			1000 ?(99)
Screen		-46%	27%	-5%	1%	-16%
Brightness middle	370	254 -31%	322 -13%	313 -15%	329 -11%	315 -15%
Brightness	333	254 -24%	308 -8%	297 -11%	286 -14%	298 -11%
Brightness Distribution	84	93 11%	92 10%	88 5%	79 -6%	88 5%
Black Level *	0.38	0.23 39%	0.18 53%	0.27 29%	0.3 21%	0.29 24%
Contrast	974	1104 13%	1789 84%	1159 19%	1097 13%	1086 11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.41	4.12 -71%	1.53 37%	2.96 -23%	2.52 -5%	4.3 -78%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.32	19.66 -169%	3.14 57%	9.83 -34%	6.9 6%	7.3 -0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.19	3.78 -218%	0.74 38%	1.03 13%	1.31 -10%	2.29 -92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.9	3.2 18%	1.9 51%	4.9 -26%	2.98 24%	4.3 -10%
Gamma	2.287 ^96%	2.179 ^101%	2.144 ^103%	2.187 ^101%	2.38 ^92%	2.084 ^106%
CCT	7302 ^89%	6754 ^96%	6809 ^95%	7559 ^86%	6738 ^96%	7434 ^87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	69	41 -41%	65 -6%	66 -4%	60 -13%	66 -4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	59 -37%	87 -6%	89 -4%	95 2%	92 -1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-84% / -60%	6% / 17%	-1% / -3%	2% / 1%	-8% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

In the state of delivery, the display offers a good color reproduction, meeting the target (Delta E < 3) with a color deviation of 2.41. The display does not suffer from a blue tint. Via calibration, you can achieve some improvements, with the color deviation dropping to 1.19 and the Grayscale display becoming more balanced. The AdobeRGB (69%) and sRGB (93%) color spaces are not fully covered.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.8 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19019 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The viewing angles of the IPS panel are stable and the display contents can be read from any position. Outdoors, the display contents can be read if the sun isn't too bright.

Performance - Sufficient for the next few years

The XMG Core 17 is able to bring every current game to the screen smoothly and also strikes a good figure in all the other application areas.

Test Conditions

You can switch between the three performance profiles "Balanced," "Enthusiast," and "Overboost" via the preinstalled Control Center or the profile switching key (next to the power button). For our test, we used the "Enthusiast" profile (PL1/PL2: 60 watts) and the automatic fan control. Several benchmarks were also run with the "Overboost" profile (PL1/PL2: 75 watts) activated. During the battery tests, we used the "Balanced" profile (PL1/PL2: 35 watts).

Processor

The Core i7-10870H octa-core processor (Comet Lake) runs at a basic clock speed of 2.2 GHz. Via Turbo, this can be increased up to a maximum of 4.2 GHz (eight cores) and 5 GHz (single core). Hyperthreading (two threads per core) is supported.

The processor runs through the CPU tests of the Cinebench R15 benchmark at 3 to 3.8 GHz (multi-thread) and 4 to 4.8 GHz (single thread). In battery operation, the CPU operates at clock speeds between 2.6 and 2.9 GHz (multi-thread) and between 2.4 and 4.2 GHz (single thread).

We evaluate whether the CPU Turbo is also used constantly in mains operation by running the multi-thread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark for at least 30 minutes in a constant loop. The Turbo is used at a medium level. The "Overboost" performance profile only causes the clock speed to increase slightly.

Overall, the Core i7 does not fully make use of its capabilities in the multi-thread benchmarks. In order to get more performance from it, the power limits of the CPU would need to be raised, which would be possible via the preinstalled Control Center, where the maximum configurable would be 120 watts (PL1/PL2). We also ran the CB15 loop with this performance setting in order to test this - without running into any problems.

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1367 (1316.83-1382.98)

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H; Overboost: Ø1463 (1432.51-1477.1)

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H; Overboost, PL1/2 120 Watt: Ø1651 (1639.14-1677.08)

MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1926 (1876.79-1982.55)

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1290 (1277.75-1322.62)

Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1347 (1332.27-1364.11)

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1010 (998.28-1099.87)

SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1200 (1187.65-1299.17)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Overboost)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Overboost, PL1/2: 120 watts)

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

196 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1382 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

147.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=245, last 2 years)	256 Points ∼100% +31%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	209 Points ∼82% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (196 - 204, n=11)	199.8 Points ∼78% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	196 Points ∼77% 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	196 Points ∼77%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	195 Points ∼76% -1%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	190 Points ∼74% -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H	180 Points ∼70% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=246, last 2 years)	2737 Points ∼100% +98%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1983 (1876.79^min - 1982.55^max) Points ∼72% +43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, PL1/2 120 Watt)	1677 Points ∼61% +21%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (1336 - 1740, n=14)	1614 Points ∼59% +17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	1477 Points ∼54% +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	1382 Points ∼50%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	1364 Points ∼50% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	1323 Points ∼48% -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	1299 (1187.65^min - 1299^max) Points ∼47% -6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H	1100 Points ∼40% -20%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	358 Seconds * ∼100% -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	351 Seconds * ∼98% -8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	326 Seconds * ∼91%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	322 Seconds * ∼90% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	315 Seconds * ∼88% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (272 - 333, n=12)	298 Seconds * ∼83% +9%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	254 Seconds * ∼71% +22%
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=238, last 2 years)	224 Seconds * ∼63% +31%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=238, last 2 years)	5899 MIPS ∼100% +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	5438 MIPS ∼92% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	5393 MIPS ∼91%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	5297 MIPS ∼90% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (5145 - 5429, n=12)	5293 MIPS ∼90% -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	5191 MIPS ∼88% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	5190 MIPS ∼88% -4%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4686 MIPS ∼79% -13%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=237, last 2 years)	68874 MIPS ∼100% +68%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	52364 MIPS ∼76% +28%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (39581 - 46708, n=12)	44452 MIPS ∼65% +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	44110 MIPS ∼64% +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	40876 MIPS ∼59%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	37082 MIPS ∼54% -9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	36771 MIPS ∼53% -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	31612 MIPS ∼46% -23%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=240, last 2 years)	663 Points ∼100% +39%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	491 Points ∼74% +3%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	485 Points ∼73% +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	476 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (460 - 484, n=12)	474 Points ∼71% 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	471 Points ∼71% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	463 Points ∼70% -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H	441 Points ∼67% -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=240, last 2 years)	6487 Points ∼100% +100%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4497 Points ∼69% +39%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (3027 - 4020, n=12)	3588 Points ∼55% +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	3354 Points ∼52% +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	3244 Points ∼50%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	3144 Points ∼48% -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	2968 Points ∼46% -9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H	2434 Points ∼38% -25%

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=241, last 2 years)	1724 Points ∼100% +36%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	1333 Points ∼77% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	1331 Points ∼77% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (1191 - 1295, n=12)	1273 Points ∼74% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	1268 Points ∼74% 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	1264 Points ∼73%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	1262 Points ∼73% 0%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1201 Points ∼70% -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=241, last 2 years)	12155 Points ∼100% +82%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	8047 Points ∼66% +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (6403 - 7882, n=12)	7482 Points ∼62% +12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	7025 Points ∼58% +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	6688 Points ∼55%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	6652 Points ∼55% -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	6394 Points ∼53% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	6349 Points ∼52% -5%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=241, last 2 years)	19 fps ∼100% +71%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	13.3 fps ∼70% +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (10.7 - 13.5, n=12)	12.2 fps ∼64% +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	11.6 fps ∼61% +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	11.6 fps ∼61% +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	11.1 fps ∼58%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	10.4 fps ∼55% -6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	10.2 fps ∼54% -8%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	59.2 s * ∼100% -6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	56.1 s * ∼95%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	54.3 s * ∼92% +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	54.1 s * ∼91% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (46 - 64.4, n=12)	53.7 s * ∼91% +4%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=237, last 2 years)	49.6 s * ∼84% +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	48.36 s * ∼82% +14%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	46 s * ∼78% +18%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.614 sec * ∼100% -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.593 sec * ∼97% -3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	0.593 sec * ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (0.573 - 0.614, n=12)	0.591 sec * ∼96% -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H	0.578 sec * ∼94% -0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H	0.577 sec * ∼94%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.574 sec * ∼93% +1%
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=238, last 2 years)	0.4918 sec * ∼80% +15%

* ... smaller is better

System Performance

The fast and smoothly running system will also offer sufficient performance for the next few years for demanding application areas such as gaming and video and image processing. The PC-Mark results are good as well.

The working memory (DDR4-3200, 2x 8 GB, max. 64 GB) runs in dual-channel mode.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4073 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5816 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5375 points
PCMark 10 Score		5685 points
Help

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=197, last 2 years)	7385 Points ∼100% +30%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	5911 Points ∼80% +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5685 Points ∼77%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	5685 Points ∼77% 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5657 Points ∼77% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5581 Points ∼76% -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5185 Points ∼70% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	5109 Points ∼69% -10%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12176, n=196, last 2 years)	10571 Points ∼100% +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	9728 Points ∼92% +6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	9555 Points ∼90% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	9209 Points ∼87% 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	9182 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9182 Points ∼87% 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	9096 Points ∼86% -1%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8873 Points ∼84% -3%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)	9559 Points ∼100% +32%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	8057 Points ∼84% +12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	7735 Points ∼81% +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	7557 Points ∼79% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	7415 Points ∼78% +3%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	7318 Points ∼77% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	7217 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	7217 Points ∼75% 0%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=196, last 2 years)	10888 Points ∼100% +45%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8632 Points ∼79% +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	7526 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	7526 Points ∼69% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	6912 Points ∼63% -8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	6530 Points ∼60% -13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5504 Points ∼51% -27%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	4702 Points ∼43% -38%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (3570 - 6657, n=41, last 2 years)	5130 Points ∼100% +26%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	4401 Points ∼86% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4350 Points ∼85% +7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	4291 Points ∼84% +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	4136 Points ∼81% +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	4073 Points ∼79%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	4073 Points ∼79% 0%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4622 - 7085, n=40, last 2 years)	5997 Points ∼100% +12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	5817 Points ∼97% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5792 Points ∼97% +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5697 Points ∼95% +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5610 Points ∼94% +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5375 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	5375 Points ∼90% 0%

DPC Latencies

In our standardized Latency Monitor test (web surfing, 4K video reproduction, Prime95 high load), we were able to observe some conspicuous behavior in terms of the DPC latencies. This means that the system does not appear to be suitable for real-time video and audio processing.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8655 μs * ∼100% -1065%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	1000 μs * ∼12% -35%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	787 μs * ∼9% -6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	743 μs * ∼9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	506 μs * ∼6% +32%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution

An NVMe SSD (M.2-2280) from Samsung serves as the system drive. It offers 1 TB of storage and delivers good transfer rates. The laptop is able to accept a total of two NVMe SSDs, and RAID-0 is supported.

The laptop offers space for two NVMe SSDs.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3522 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3294 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 582 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 511 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2837 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3036 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 145.7 MB/s

	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-31%	-12%	-17%	-29%	4%
Write 4K	145.7	204.7 40%	141.9 -3%	151 4%	99.3 -32%	169.5 16%
Read 4K	51.3	50.4 -2%	48.75 -5%	49.29 -4%	38.47 -25%	51.5 0%
Write Seq	3036	985 -68%	2734 -10%	1109 -63%	1449 -52%	3009 -1%
Read Seq	2837	1193 -58%	1921 -32%	1049 -63%	1237 -56%	2959 4%
Write 4K Q32T1	511	537 5%	422.6 -17%	494.4 -3%	364.4 -29%	536 5%
Read 4K Q32T1	582	300 -48%	509 -13%	569 -2%	421.9 -28%	621 7%
Write Seq Q32T1	3294	982 -70%	3055 -7%	3017 -8%	3276 -1%	3339 1%
Read Seq Q32T1	3522	1985 -44%	3257 -8%	3542 1%	3338 -5%	3561 1%
AS SSD		-43%	-11%	-3%	-20%	11%
Seq Read	2876	251.9 -91%	2828 -2%	2470 -14%	2283 -21%	2937 2%
Seq Write	2803	925 -67%	2677 -4%	2473 -12%	2779 -1%	2858 2%
4K Read	55.3	58.2 5%	39.94 -28%	50.2 -9%	29.99 -46%	50.3 -9%
4K Write	106.9	98 -8%	100.9 -6%	124.4 16%	99.1 -7%	130.6 22%
4K-64 Read	1662	461.4 -72%	1562 -6%	1711 3%	1156 -30%	1710 3%
4K-64 Write	2101	924 -56%	1867 -11%	1848 -12%	2333 11%	2355 12%
Access Time Read *	0.067	0.09 -34%		0.039 42%	0.092 -37%	0.037 45%
Access Time Write *	0.037	0.022 41%	0.037 -0%	0.029 22%	0.037 -0%	0.028 24%
Score Read	2005	545 -73%	1885 -6%	2008 0%	1414 -29%	2054 2%
Score Write	2488	1114 -55%	2236 -10%	2220 -11%	2710 9%	2771 11%
Score Total	5520	1994 -64%	5076 -8%	5257 -5%	4871 -12%	5873 6%
Copy ISO MB/s	2029		1870 -8%	1909 -6%	1394 -31%	2225 10%
Copy Program MB/s	691		545 -21%	588 -15%	379.8 -45%	779 13%
Copy Game MB/s	1513		1083 -28%	975 -36%	976 -35%	1590 5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-37% / -38%	-12% / -11%	-10% / -8%	-25% / -23%	8% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics Card

The GeForce RTX-3060 laptop graphics core represents Nvidia's current entry-level model into the GPU high end. The GPU is able to use fast GDDR6 graphics storage (6144 MB). The UHD Graphics-630 graphics core integrated into the processor is active, and the laptop uses Nvidia's Optimus graphics switching solution. The GeForce GPU can be deactivated in the BIOS.

Laptop manufacturers are able to configure the TGP and with that the maximum available computing performance of a RTX 3000 graphics core fairly freely as long as they stay within the limits defined by Nvidia (Overview of all RTX 3060 laptops including their TGPs). Schenker extends this option to the users, allowing them to freely adjust the TGP up to the maximum of 130 watts (115 watts + 15 watts Dynamic Boost).

However, at a high TGP the performance increase turns out to be limited: Even though the "Overboost" profile (115 watts + 5 watts Dynamic Boost) uses a TGP that is about 26% higher than the "Enthusiast" profile (90 watts + 5 watts Dynamic Boost), the achieved test results are only up to 10% higher. This goes for the GPU tests as well as the gaming benchmarks.

Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost, TGP: 130 watts)

3DMark 11 Performance		21813 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		41707 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		17355 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		7758 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=241, last 2 years)	27594 Points ∼100% +35%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	21937 Points ∼79% +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	21683 Points ∼79% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	21446 Points ∼78% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (16354 - 23109, n=49)	20436 Points ∼74% 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	20381 Points ∼74%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	16498 Points ∼60% -19%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	16408 Points ∼59% -19%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	14537 Points ∼53% -29%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	9818 Points ∼36% -52%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=241, last 2 years)	11018 Points ∼100% +43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	8495 Points ∼77% +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost)	8333 Points ∼76% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6285 - 9235, n=49)	8057 Points ∼73% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	7837 Points ∼71% +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	7716 Points ∼70%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	6219 Points ∼56% -19%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	5555 Points ∼50% -28%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	5464 Points ∼50% -29%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	3554 Points ∼32% -54%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)	37452 Points ∼100% +40%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	27153 Points ∼73% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (13799 - 30772, n=43)	26816 Points ∼72% 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	26790 Points ∼72%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	22720 Points ∼61% -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	20697 Points ∼55% -23%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	19156 Points ∼51% -28%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	13256 Points ∼35% -51%

Gaming Performance

The hardware is able to bring all the current games to the screen smoothly. Generally, you can use the full resolution of the display (2560 x 1440 pixels, WQHD) and high to maximum quality settings while gaming. The FHD resolution would allow for a maximum quality level throughout.

Compared to all the RTX 3060 laptops that we have tested until now, the Core 17 does very well. Generally the differences in the frame rates between the devices do not turn out too large, despite the different TGP configurations. As the results of the Core 17 show, even a significant increase of the TGP value will only lead to a slight increase in the frame rates.

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=235, last 2 years)	106.5 fps ∼100% +34%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	92.5 fps ∼87% +16%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	88.5 (77^min - 102^max) fps ∼83% +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)	85.7 (38.8^min, 41.6^P0.1, 55.9^P1 - 178^max) fps ∼80% +8%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80.3 (76^min - 86^max) fps ∼75% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	79.5 (30.1^min, 37.6^P0.1, 42.6^P1 - 167^max) fps ∼75%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	79.4 (63^min) fps ∼75% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (58.2 - 91.5, n=48)	76.9 fps ∼72% -3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	72.9 (62^min) fps ∼68% -8%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	68.7 (63^min - 74^max) fps ∼65% -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	68.5 (52^min) fps ∼64% -14%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	61 (50^min) fps ∼57% -23%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	53.3 fps ∼50% -33%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	42.3 fps ∼40% -47%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (22 - 220, n=250, last 2 years)	136.1 fps ∼100% +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (90.7 - 154.8, n=49)	125.9 fps ∼93% +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	123 (108.1^min) fps ∼90% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	121 (104.1^min) fps ∼89% +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	118 (102.7^min) fps ∼87%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	113 (97.5^min) fps ∼83% -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	112 (99^min) fps ∼82% -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)	111 (97.6^min) fps ∼82% -6%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	105 (93.1^min) fps ∼77% -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	105 (93^min) fps ∼77% -11%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	90.7 (76.9^min) fps ∼67% -23%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=252, last 2 years)	95.4 fps ∼100% +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (61.9 - 109.3, n=48)	82 fps ∼86% +19%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	78.9 fps ∼83% +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	77.9 fps ∼82% +13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	75.7 fps ∼79% +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)	69.3 fps ∼73% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	68.7 fps ∼72%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	66.2 fps ∼69% -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	64.4 fps ∼68% -6%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	62.2 fps ∼65% -9%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	33.3 fps ∼35% -52%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 162.9, n=144, last 2 years)	90.7 fps ∼100% +52%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	65.4 fps ∼72% +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)	64.6 fps ∼71% +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	59.6 fps ∼66%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (41.1 - 73.7, n=25)	59.5 fps ∼66% 0%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	53.6 fps ∼59% -10%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=234, last 2 years)	102.4 fps ∼100% +28%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	87.2 fps ∼85% +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)	84.7 fps ∼83% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	81.2 fps ∼79% +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	79.9 fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (55 - 100.9, n=42)	79.4 fps ∼78% -1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	72.5 fps ∼71% -9%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	70.3 fps ∼69% -12%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	57.2 fps ∼56% -28%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	51.1 fps ∼50% -36%

Strange Brigade
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (34.8 - 318, n=119, last 2 years)	166.2 fps ∼100% +65%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)	107 (78.6^min, 84.6^P1 - 184^max) fps ∼64% +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	107 (74.1^min, 82.9^P1 - 201^max) fps ∼64% +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	101 (64.3^min, 80.2^P1 - 156^max) fps ∼61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (75.4 - 118.4, n=17)	99.7 fps ∼60% -1%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (13.8 - 421, n=235, last 2 years)	186.7 fps ∼100% +39%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	144 (94.8^min, 106^P1 - 243^max) fps ∼77% +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost)	142 (99.8^min, 108^P1 - 238^max) fps ∼76% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	141 (76.6^min, 107^P1 - 221^max) fps ∼76% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (102.2 - 166.3, n=43)	137.6 fps ∼74% +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	134 (89.3^min, 99.7^P1 - 237^max) fps ∼72%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	124 (84.1^min, 93.4^P1 - 196^max) fps ∼66% -7%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	121 (82.8^min, 89.6^P1 - 197^max) fps ∼65% -10%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (27 - 271, n=29, last 2 years)	153.1 fps ∼100% +61%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	95 fps ∼62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (84 - 95, n=4)	88.8 fps ∼58% -7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	85 (42^min) fps ∼56% -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	84 fps ∼55% -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	79 fps ∼52% -17%
2560x1440 Highest Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (60 - 199, n=25, last 2 years)	132.6 fps ∼100% +101%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	71 fps ∼54% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (66 - 71, n=3)	68.3 fps ∼52% +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	68 (42^min) fps ∼51% +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	66 fps ∼50%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (14 - 218, n=139, last 2 years)	119.1 fps ∼100% +17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	106 (84^min - 134^max) fps ∼89% +4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	102 (80^min - 128^max) fps ∼86%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (80 - 120, n=31)	101.6 fps ∼85% 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)	101 (81^min - 126^max) fps ∼85% -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	98 (75^min - 124^max) fps ∼82% -4%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	97 (78^min - 115^max) fps ∼81% -5%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	91 (65^min - 110^max) fps ∼76% -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	83 fps ∼70% -19%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (14 - 194, n=81, last 2 years)	109.7 fps ∼100% +34%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	86 (74^min - 98^max) fps ∼78% +5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	84 (71^min - 96^max) fps ∼77% +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)	84 (71^min - 95^max) fps ∼77% +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	82 (73^min - 94^max) fps ∼75%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (58 - 92, n=12)	79.8 fps ∼73% -3%

GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=229, last 2 years)	101.4 fps ∼100% +17%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	92.5 (9.14^min, 62.5^P1 - 184^max) fps ∼91% +6%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)	91.6 (20.2^min, 62.5^P1 - 183^max) fps ∼90% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (69.2 - 109.8, n=46)	89.7 fps ∼88% +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	89.4 (19.9^min, 58.8^P1 - 173^max) fps ∼88% +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	86.9 (19.6^min, 58.8^P1 - 169^max) fps ∼86%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	84.5 (4.51^min, 55.6^P1 - 164^max) fps ∼83% -3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	74 (5.27^min, 47.6^P1 - 151^max) fps ∼73% -15%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	69.2 (4.86^min, 47.6^P1 - 137^max) fps ∼68% -20%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (5.61 - 160.6, n=122, last 2 years)	98.1 fps ∼100% +32%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	75.9 (18.2^min, 52.6^P1 - 142^max) fps ∼77% +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)	75.2 (18.1^min, 52.6^P1 - 134^max) fps ∼77% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	74.3 (18.9^min, 50^P1 - 127^max) fps ∼76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (52 - 86.5, n=23)	74.3 fps ∼76% 0%

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	100 pt ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 ^-12! Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	86.9 pt ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 ^-7! Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80.9 pt ∼81%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) ^-5! Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	79 pt ∼79%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) ^-2! Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	77.9 pt ∼78%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) ^-7! AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	74.1 pt ∼74%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	73.8 pt ∼74%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	72.6 pt ∼73%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF ^-6! Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	72.5 pt ∼73%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere ^-6! AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	70.7 pt ∼71%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE ^-5! Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	67.3 pt ∼67%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake ^-10! Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	67.1 pt ∼67%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 ^-10! Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	58.5 pt ∼59%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 ^-11! Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	58 pt ∼58%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK ^-9! AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	54.8 pt ∼55%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=235, last 2 years)	106.5 fps ∼100% +34%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	92.5 fps ∼87% +16%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	88.5 (77^min - 102^max) fps ∼83% +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)	85.7 (38.8^min, 41.6^P0.1, 55.9^P1 - 178^max) fps ∼80% +8%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	80.3 (76^min - 86^max) fps ∼75% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	79.5 (30.1^min, 37.6^P0.1, 42.6^P1 - 167^max) fps ∼75%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	79.4 (63^min) fps ∼75% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (58.2 - 91.5, n=48)	76.9 fps ∼72% -3%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	72.9 (62^min) fps ∼68% -8%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	68.7 (63^min - 74^max) fps ∼65% -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	68.5 (52^min) fps ∼64% -14%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	61 (50^min) fps ∼57% -23%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	53.3 fps ∼50% -33%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	42.3 fps ∼40% -47%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (22 - 220, n=250, last 2 years)	136.1 fps ∼100% +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (90.7 - 154.8, n=49)	125.9 fps ∼93% +7%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	123 (108.1^min) fps ∼90% +4%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	121 (104.1^min) fps ∼89% +3%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	118 (102.7^min) fps ∼87%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	113 (97.5^min) fps ∼83% -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	112 (99^min) fps ∼82% -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)	111 (97.6^min) fps ∼82% -6%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	105 (93.1^min) fps ∼77% -11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	105 (93^min) fps ∼77% -11%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	90.7 (76.9^min) fps ∼67% -23%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=252, last 2 years)	95.4 fps ∼100% +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (61.9 - 109.3, n=48)	82 fps ∼86% +19%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	78.9 fps ∼83% +15%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3060, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	77.9 fps ∼82% +13%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile	75.7 fps ∼79% +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Overboost)	69.3 fps ∼73% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	68.7 fps ∼72%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	66.2 fps ∼69% -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	64.4 fps ∼68% -6%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	62.2 fps ∼65% -9%
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	33.3 fps ∼35% -52%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 162.9, n=144, last 2 years)	90.7 fps ∼100% +52%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	65.4 fps ∼72% +10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)	64.6 fps ∼71% +8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	59.6 fps ∼66%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (41.1 - 73.7, n=25)	59.5 fps ∼66% 0%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	53.6 fps ∼59% -10%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=234, last 2 years)	102.4 fps ∼100% +28%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP: 130 Watt)	87.2 fps ∼85% +9%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost)	84.7 fps ∼83% +6%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	81.2 fps ∼79% +2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	79.9 fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (55 - 100.9, n=42)	79.4 fps ∼78% -1%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)	72.5 fps ∼71% -9%
MSI GF65 Thin 10UE Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (1.3)