Medion Erazer Beast X10 (Tongfang GM7MPHP) in review: Stable, slim, compact gaming laptop with good battery life

Successful. The compact Erazer Beast X10 brings all the latest computer games smoothly onto the 17.3-inch matte display (Full HD, IPS, 144 Hz). The gaming laptop scores points with 32 GB of RAM (dual-channel mode), space for two NVMe SSDs, and good battery life.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), Published 11/27/2020 🇩🇪 🇵🇹 ...

With the Erazer Beast X10, Medion has a compact 17.3-inch gaming laptop in its range that is based on a barebone from Tongfang. The test device provided to us is powered by a Core i7-10750H processor and a GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max Q graphics core. Alternatively, models with the Core i9-10980HK processor and/or the GeForce RTX 2080 Super GPU are available. Competitors include devices like the Schenker XMG Neo 17, the Asus Strix G17 G712LWS, the MSI GS75 10SF, the Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54, and the Razer Blade Pro 17.

Test device courtesy of Medion DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 (Erazer Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-10750H 6 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 120 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1380 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 115 W TDP, GDDR6, 27.21.14.5730 (Nvidia 457.30), Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR4 2666, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Phillips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM470

Storage

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB

, 2x M.2 2280 (NVMe), no RAID 0/1, 863 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC274 @ Intel Comet Point-H PCH - cAVS

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: microphone input, headset combined port, Card Reader: microSD, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 24.6 x 394.8 x 261.8 ( = 0.97 x 15.54 x 10.31 in)

Battery

91.2 Wh, 7900 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 6-cell

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, CyberLink PowerRecover, McAfee LiveSafe (trial), MS Office 365 (trial), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.26 kg ( = 79.72 oz / 4.98 pounds), Power Supply: 490 g ( = 17.28 oz / 1.08 pounds)

Price

2 Euro

Links

Medion homepage
Medion notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.7 %	11/2020	Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.3 kg	24.6 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.8 %	11/2020	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	2.6 kg	27.45 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
83.1 %	10/2020	Asus Strix G17 G712LWS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	2.8 kg	26.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
83.6 %	10/2020	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.8 kg	25 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
83.7 %	07/2020	MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.3 kg	18.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
87.4 %	06/2020	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.7 kg	19.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Case - The X10 features a compact metal case

The demand for gaming laptops that come in a discreet design is growing increasingly. With the Beast X10, the supply has been extended by a further device of this kind. Here, Medion uses a fancy, matte black colored full metal case that wouldn't attract attention in a professional environment. The slim display bezels contribute greatly to the laptop's attractive look. You can reach the inside after removing the bottom cover. The battery is firmly installed.

The laptop shows good workmanship. The gap dimensions are in order, and there's no excess material to be found. Moreover, the device doesn't show any stability deficiencies. The opposite is the case: The X10 offers such a rigid base unit that it's rare for us to find something like it. The lid can be twisted, but the whole situation still remains within the limits. Pressure on the backside of the lid doesn't lead to changes on the image. The hinges hold the lid firmly in position. The maximum aperture angle is about 130 degrees. In addition, opening the lid with one hand is possible.

Within our comparison field, the Erazer is one of the most compact devices. It's only just beaten by the Razer Blade Pro 17. However, it weighs almost 400 grams less than the Blade.

Size comparison

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Asus Strix G17 G712LWS SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 MSI GS75 10SF-609US Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz DIN A4 ❌

Connectivity - Thunderbolt 3 on board

The X10 offers a well-rounded interface selection. The laptop comes with three USB Type-A ports (2x USB 3.1 Gen 1, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2) and one USB Type-C port (Thunderbolt 3). The latter supports DisplayPort via USB-C. Therefore, the laptop has two video outputs together with the HDMI 2.0 connection. The whole package is rounded off with two audio jacks (headphone output, microphone input), a Gigabit Ethernet port, and an opening for a cable lock. A microSD memory card reader is also included.

Right side: Memory card reader (microSD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A)

Left side: Cable lock slot, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A), microphone input, headphone output

Back: Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, power supply

How much memory does the X10 support?

Medion's specifications regarding RAM are unclear. On the Medion website it says: "Max. supported RAM memory: 32 GB". It seems that this doesn't refer to the maximum possible amount of RAM but to the maximum size of the individual memory modules. We have successfully replaced one of the two 16 GB modules with a 32 GB module (see HWiNFO screenshot). As a result, the X10 should support up to 64 GB of RAM.

The Erazer supports more than 32 GB of RAM.

Communication

The WLAN chip (AX201) from Intel supports the 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax WLAN standards and offers Bluetooth 5 functionality. The transmission speeds determined under optimal conditions (no other WLAN devices nearby, short distance between laptop and server PC) are outstanding. A Gigabit controller from Realtek's well-known RTL8168/8111 family is responsible for wired network connections. It performs its tasks smoothly.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1340 MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1283 (1089^min - 1413^max) MBit/s ∼96% +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1270 (1080^min - 1388^max) MBit/s ∼95% +8%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1190 MBit/s ∼89% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1180 MBit/s ∼88%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s ∼87% -2%
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1580, n=39, last 2 years)	1141 MBit/s ∼85% -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1090 MBit/s ∼81% -8%
iperf3 receive AX12
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1480 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1420 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1390 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1280 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming (423 - 1700, n=39, last 2 years)	1230 MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1182 (1085^min - 1338^max) MBit/s ∼80% -20%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1177 (773^min - 1353^max) MBit/s ∼80% -20%

Webcam

The webcam (0.9 MP; max. 1280x720 pixels) is located at the bottom of the display. It doesn't produce convincing images, since it lacks color accuracy. With a deviation of almost 20, the target (Delta E less than 3) is clearly missed.

ColorChecker Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804: 19.69 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 32.41 ∆E

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz

Accessories

The laptop comes with the usual documents: A quick-start guide and warranty information.

Maintenance

You can get to the inside of the laptop quite easily. After removing all screws on the underside of the device, the bottom cover can be detached. A grout finishing tool or a thin spatula can be used to loosen the clamps securing the bottom cover; it sits quite tightly in some places. Afterwards, you have access to the two memory slots (both occupied), the two M.2 2280 slots (one occupied), the WLAN module, the BIOS battery, and the rechargeable battery.

Warranty

Medion grants the Erazer a two-year warranty. Warranty extensions are not available.

Input devices - Chiclet keyboard with RGB backlighting

Keyboard

The X10 has a backlit chiclet keyboard on board; its concave keys offer a short travel and a clear pressure point. The keys sit quite close together (distance: Approx. 2 mm). The main keys are fairly large, measuring about 16 x 16 mm. Good: The keyboard doesn't yield during typing. All in all, Medion delivers a keyboard suitable for everyday use here.

Touchpad

The multi-touch capable ClickPad takes up an area of about 13.2 x 7.4 cm. The smooth surface doesn't hinder the fingers' ability to glide. The pad reacts precisely to input - even in the corners. It offers a short travel and a clear pressure point.

Display - 144 Hz IPS

The matte 17.3-inch display of the Beast X10 has a native resolution of 1920x1080 pixels. Brightness (297.3 cd/m²) and contrast (1,159:1) are at a fairly good level. Positive: The display shows no PWM flickering. Moreover, the response times of the 144 Hz panel are in order.


277 cd/m²	300 cd/m²	297 cd/m²
300 cd/m²	313 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
295 cd/m²	297 cd/m²	297 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Phillips LP173WFG-SPB3

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 313 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 297.3 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 313 cd/m²
Contrast: 1159:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.96 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.187

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 LG Phillips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake BOE HF NE173FHM-NZ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Asus Strix G17 G712LWS LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI GS75 10SF-609US Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		7%	1%	-2%	12%	9%
Display P3 Coverage	64.5	69.4 8%	65.2 1%	62.6 -3%	75.6 17%	72.2 12%
sRGB Coverage	95.6	99.2 4%	96.8 1%	94.3 -1%	99.8 4%	98.5 3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.6	70.9 8%	66.4 1%	64.7 -1%	75.1 14%	73 11%
Response Times		31%	-2%	-11%	50%	33%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2) 25%	14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6) -0%	16.4 ?(8, 8.4) -14%	5 ?(2.2, 2.8) 65%	5.6 ?(2.6, 3) 61%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(5.2, 4.8)	6.4 ?(3, 3.2) 36%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) -4%	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2) -8%	6.6 ?(2.6, 4) 34%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 4%
PWM Frequency				24510 ?(19)
Screen		8%	2%	27%	6%	-21%
Brightness middle	313	327 4%	323 3%	322 3%	299.4 -4%	328 5%
Brightness	297	305 3%	300 1%	308 4%	299 1%	329 11%
Brightness Distribution	88	87 -1%	89 1%	92 5%	84 -5%	78 -11%
Black Level *	0.27	0.32 -19%	0.31 -15%	0.18 33%	0.31 -15%	0.35 -30%
Contrast	1159	1022 -12%	1042 -10%	1789 54%	966 -17%	937 -19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.96	2.16 27%	3.01 -2%	1.53 48%	1.82 39%	4.74 -60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.83	6.14 38%	7.65 22%	3.14 68%	3.91 60%	8.99 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.03	0.89 14%	1 3%	0.74 28%	1.59 -54%	2.12 -106%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.9	3.7 24%	3.8 22%	1.9 61%	2.7 45%	6.8 -39%
Gamma	2.187 ^101%	2.24 ^98%	2.154 ^102%	2.144 ^103%	2.18 ^101%	2.2 ^100%
CCT	7559 ^86%	6799 ^96%	7507 ^87%	6809 ^95%	6837 ^95%	6446 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	66	71 8%	66 0%	65 -2%	67.1 2%	64.8 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	89	93 4%	90 1%	87 -2%	99.8 12%	98.6 11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		15% / 11%	0% / 2%	5% / 17%	23% / 12%	7% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Already out of the box, the display shows a very decent color reproduction. With a Delta E 2000 color deviation of just under 3, the target (Delta E less than 3) is met. In addition, the display doesn't suffer from a blue tint. Calibration provides for improvements: In this way, the color deviation is reduced to 1.03, and the grayscales are displayed in a more balanced way. The AdobeRGB (66%) and sRGB (89%) color spaces aren't fully reproduced.

Medion Erazer Beast X10 vs. AdobeRGB (66%)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18982 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The laptop is equipped with a viewing-angle stable IPS panel. Consequently, the screen can be read from any position. Outdoors, the display can be read when the sun isn't shining too brightly.

Performance - Sufficient for the coming years

With the Erazer Beast X10, Medion has a 17.3-inch gaming laptop in its range that brings every modern game smoothly onto the screen. Our test device will set you back about 2,200 Euros (~$2,631). Other configurations are available.

Test conditions

The preinstalled Gaming Center allows you to monitor the system status, adjust the keyboard backlight, and select a performance profile ("Office Mode", "Game Mode", "Turbo Mode"). We conducted our test under the "Game Mode" and with automatic fan control. The "Turbo Mode" doesn't increase performance compared to the "Game Mode". This might be different with other configuration variants of the X10. Next to the laptop's power button, there's another key that serves to quickly switch between profiles.

	Game Mode	Turbo Mode	Office Mode	Office Mode - Eco
PL1	120 watts	120 watts	100 watts	25 watts
PL2	120 watts	120 watts	100 watts	25 watts

For most users, the "Game Mode" and the "Office Mode", including the manually selectable "Eco" option, should be of interest, since this is a good choice for everyday use (office, Internet). The CPU then works at the same power level as conventional ULV processors. In other words: The computing power decreases, and the fans work much less frequently. Some of the comparison tables in this review contain benchmark results obtained under the "Office Mode (Eco)" profile.

Processor

Medion equips the X10 with a Core i7-10750H hexa-core processor (Comet Lake). The CPU works at a base speed of 2.6 GHz. The clock rate can be increased to 4.3 GHz (six cores) or up to 5 GHz (one core) via Turbo. Hyper-Threading (two threads per core) is supported.

The CPU processes the multithread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark at 4.2 GHz. The single-thread test is executed at 4.2 to 5 GHz. On battery power, the speeds are 2.2 to 2.5 GHz (multithread) and 2.2 to 2.7 GHz (single-thread), respectively.

Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1347 (1332.27-1364.11)

Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H; Office Mode (Eco): Ø732 (717.91-804.34)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1380 (1371.22-1443.31)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H; Overboost: Ø1766 (1751.01-1787.71)

Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1296 (1270.16-1339.9)

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1290 (1277.75-1322.62)

MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1620 (1596.04-1713.21)

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Office Mode - Eco)

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

196 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1364 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

132.9 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=244, last 2 years)	258 Points ∼100% +32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	210 Points ∼81% +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	208 Points ∼81% +6%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	202 Points ∼78% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	200 Points ∼78% +2%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	198 Points ∼77% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (184 - 213, n=45)	196.7 Points ∼76% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	196 Points ∼76%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	195 Points ∼76% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))	184 Points ∼71% -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=245, last 2 years)	2763 Points ∼100% +103%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	1788 Points ∼65% +31%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	1713 (1596.04^min - 1713.21^max) Points ∼62% +26%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	1549 (1352.68^min - 1494.38^max) Points ∼56% +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	1443 Points ∼52% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	1364 Points ∼49%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	1344 Points ∼49% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	1323 Points ∼48% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (804 - 1418, n=50)	1263 Points ∼46% -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))	804 Points ∼29% -41%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))	531 Seconds * ∼100% -65%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43)	389 Seconds * ∼73% -21%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	351 Seconds * ∼66% -9%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	347 Seconds * ∼65% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	324 Seconds * ∼61% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	322 Seconds * ∼61%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	321 Seconds * ∼60% -0%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	280 Seconds * ∼53% +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	258.6 Seconds * ∼49% +20%
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=237, last 2 years)	223 Seconds * ∼42% +31%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=237, last 2 years)	5922 MIPS ∼100% +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	5594 MIPS ∼94% +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	5556 MIPS ∼94% +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	5245 MIPS ∼89% +1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	5232 MIPS ∼88% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	5191 MIPS ∼88%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	5190 MIPS ∼88% 0%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	5118 MIPS ∼86% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43)	5114 MIPS ∼86% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))	5081 MIPS ∼86% -2%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=236, last 2 years)	69569 MIPS ∼100% +88%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	49474 MIPS ∼71% +33%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	48397 MIPS ∼70% +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	44252 MIPS ∼64% +19%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	37082 MIPS ∼53%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	36718 MIPS ∼53% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43)	33946 MIPS ∼49% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	33674 MIPS ∼48% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	31612 MIPS ∼45% -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))	26040 MIPS ∼37% -30%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=239, last 2 years)	667 Points ∼100%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	507 Points ∼76%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	501 Points ∼75%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	494 Points ∼74%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	483 Points ∼72%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	475 Points ∼71%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43)	473 Points ∼71%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	463 Points ∼69%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=239, last 2 years)	6562 Points ∼100%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	4059 Points ∼62%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	3885 Points ∼59%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	3367 Points ∼51%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	3323 Points ∼51%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	3247 Points ∼49%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	3144 Points ∼48%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43)	2848 Points ∼43%

Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=243, last 2 years)	1733 Points ∼100% +30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	1346 Points ∼78% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	1331 Points ∼77%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	1321 Points ∼76% -1%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	1290 Points ∼74% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	1278 Points ∼74% -4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	1271 Points ∼73% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43)	1263 Points ∼73% -5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	1262 Points ∼73% -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=243, last 2 years)	12264 Points ∼100% +84%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	8412 Points ∼69% +26%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	8363 Points ∼68% +26%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	7531 Points ∼61% +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	7373 Points ∼60% +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	6652 Points ∼54%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	6370 Points ∼52% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	6349 Points ∼52% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43)	6135 Points ∼50% -8%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=240, last 2 years)	19.2 fps ∼100% +66%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	14.1 fps ∼73% +22%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	12.8 fps ∼67% +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	11.9 fps ∼62% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	11.6 fps ∼60%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	10.8 fps ∼56% -7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	10.4 fps ∼54% -10%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)	9.61 fps ∼50% -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))	7.11 fps ∼37% -39%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	57.8 s * ∼100% -20%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	55.4 s * ∼96% -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	54.3 s * ∼94% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)	53.3 s * ∼92% -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	51.9 s * ∼90% -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))	50.6 s * ∼88% -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	50.2 s * ∼87% -4%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=235, last 2 years)	49.3 s * ∼85% -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	48.36 s * ∼84%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	41.93 s * ∼73% +13%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.614 sec * ∼100% -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H (Office Mode (Eco))	0.613 sec * ∼100% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)	0.611 sec * ∼100% -3%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	0.609 sec * ∼99% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.593 sec * ∼97%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	0.589 sec * ∼96% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	0.566 sec * ∼92% +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	0.546 sec * ∼89% +8%
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=237, last 2 years)	0.4883 sec * ∼80% +18%

* ... smaller is better

System performance

The system runs well and smoothly. We didn't encounter any problems. Owners of the Beast X10 won't lack system performance - and this is true for the coming years as well. The hardware cuts a fine figure in all common application areas. This is also confirmed by the results in the PCMark benchmarks.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4350 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4277 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5792 points
PCMark 10 Score		5581 points
Help

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=197, last 2 years)	7405 Points ∼100% +33%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	6582 Points ∼89% +18%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	6290 Points ∼85% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (5581 - 6093, n=2)	5837 Points ∼79% +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5747 Points ∼78% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5581 Points ∼75%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5262 Points ∼71% -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	5109 Points ∼69% -8%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	5217 Points ∼100% +20%
Average of class Gaming (3570 - 6657, n=40, last 2 years)	5136 Points ∼98% +18%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	4780 Points ∼92% +10%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	4412 Points ∼85% +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	4405 Points ∼84% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4350 Points ∼83%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	4350 Points ∼83% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	4291 Points ∼82% -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	6317 Points ∼100% +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	6191 Points ∼98% +7%
Average of class Gaming (4622 - 7085, n=39, last 2 years)	6004 Points ∼95% +4%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5832 Points ∼92% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	5817 Points ∼92% 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5803 Points ∼92% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5792 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	5792 Points ∼92% 0%

DPC latencies

In our standardized latency monitor test (web surfing, 4K video playback, high-load Prime95), we could observe issues with the DPC latencies. The system doesn't seem to be suitable for real-time video and audio-editing.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	3226 μs * ∼100% -310%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	1030 μs * ∼32% -31%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	787 μs * ∼24%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	506 μs * ∼16% +36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	450.4 μs * ∼14% +43%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	364 μs * ∼11% +54%

* ... smaller is better

Storage

The system drive is an NVMe SSD (M.2 2280) from Samsung. It provides 1 TB of storage space and delivers very good transfer rates. The laptop still has room for a second NVMe SSD.

The laptop offers space for two NVMe SSDs.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3542 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3017 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 569 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 494.4 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1049 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1109 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 49.29 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 151 MB/s

	Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	MSI GS75 10SF-609US WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Lite-On CA5-8D512	Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		35%	0%	24%	32%	21%	18%
Write 4K	151	158.6 5%	141.1 -7%	141.9 -6%	177.9 18%	119 -21%	139.7 ?(76.2 - 229, n=36) -7%
Read 4K	49.29	53.6 9%	60.9 24%	48.75 -1%	47.42 -4%	51.9 5%	49.9 ?(34.3 - 75.5, n=36) 1%
Write Seq	1109	2671 141%	1681 52%	2734 147%	2707 144%	2258 104%	2036 ?(776 - 2975, n=35) 84%
Read Seq	1049	2130 103%	1602 53%	1921 83%	2369 126%	2283 118%	2014 ?(973 - 2639, n=35) 92%
Write 4K Q32T1	494.4	525 6%	406.6 -18%	422.6 -15%	427.8 -13%	491 -1%	461 ?(268 - 656, n=36) -7%
Read 4K Q32T1	569	609 7%	470.2 -17%	509 -11%	543 -5%	540 -5%	499 ?(289 - 730, n=36) -12%
Write Seq Q32T1	3017	3308 10%	1759 -42%	3055 1%	2703 -10%	2253 -25%	2903 ?(788 - 3033, n=36) -4%
Read Seq Q32T1	3542	3557 0%	1932 -45%	3257 -8%	3387 -4%	3172 -10%	3479 ?(2853 - 3568, n=36) -2%
AS SSD		5%	-46%	-6%	-39%	-82%	-10%
Seq Read	2470	2882 17%	1778 -28%	2828 14%	2327 -6%	2019 -18%	2553 ?(1938 - 3148, n=37) 3%
Seq Write	2473	2764 12%	1478 -40%	2677 8%	2479 0%	1314 -47%	2084 ?(1248 - 2837, n=37) -16%
4K Read	50.2	55.9 11%	49.76 -1%	39.94 -20%	45.46 -9%	46.61 -7%	53.1 ?(44.3 - 68.4, n=37) 6%
4K Write	124.4	129.4 4%	117.9 -5%	100.9 -19%	157.4 27%	90.2 -27%	131.2 ?(87.4 - 208, n=37) 5%
4K-64 Read	1711	1793 5%	591 -65%	1562 -9%	1050 -39%	665 -61%	1477 ?(762 - 2093, n=37) -14%
4K-64 Write	1848	2140 16%	875 -53%	1867 1%	938 -49%	813 -56%	1805 ?(1074 - 2152, n=37) -2%
Access Time Read *	0.039	0.054 -38%	0.082 -110%		0.076 -95%	0.058 -49%	0.04983 ?(0.032 - 0.087, n=36) -28%
Access Time Write *	0.029	0.03 -3%	0.041 -41%	0.037 -28%	0.071 -145%	0.167 -476%	0.04222 ?(0.017 - 0.128, n=37) -46%
Score Read	2008	2137 6%	818 -59%	1885 -6%	1328 -34%	913 -55%	1786 ?(1078 - 2449, n=37) -11%
Score Write	2220	2546 15%	1140 -49%	2236 1%	1343 -40%	1034 -53%	2144 ?(1471 - 2527, n=37) -3%
Score Total	5257	5774 10%	2377 -55%	5076 -3%	3366 -36%	2392 -54%	4826 ?(3309 - 6095, n=37) -8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		20% / 18%	-23% / -27%	9% / 7%	-4% / -9%	-31% / -39%	4% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics card

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max Q graphics core (Turing) is part of the GPU upper class. It's accompanied by fast GDDR6 memory (8,192 MB). The 3DMark results are at a normal level for the GPU used here. "Turbo Mode" doesn't increase graphics performance. The UHD Graphics 630 GPU integrated into the processor is active, and the laptop works with Nvidia's Optimus graphics-switching solution.

It's not mandatory to use Optimus. The laptop's BIOS offers three options: "MSHybrid" (= Optimus), "iGPU Only" (= UHD Graphics 630), "dGPU Only" (= 2070 Super). It's possible to connect the display directly to the GeForce GPU.

Fire Strike (Office Mode, battery power)

Fire Strike (Office Mode - Eco, plugged in)

3DMark 11 Performance		21735 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		40152 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18534 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		7736 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years)	37568 Points ∼100% +38%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	29011 Points ∼77% +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H	28502 Points ∼76% +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	27694 Points ∼74% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	27153 Points ∼72%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (24244 - 28900, n=10)	27104 Points ∼72% 0%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	24066 Points ∼64% -11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	20697 Points ∼55% -24%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	134255 Points ∼100% +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H	131420 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=159, last 2 years)	130951 Points ∼98% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	126845 Points ∼94%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	123700 Points ∼92% -2%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	121539 Points ∼91% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (65295 - 134954, n=7)	117307 Points ∼87% -8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	103797 Points ∼77% -18%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=241, last 2 years)	27748 Points ∼100% +29%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	21532 Points ∼78% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	21446 Points ∼77%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H	21327 Points ∼77% -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	21191 Points ∼76% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (18559 - 21446, n=10)	20277 Points ∼73% -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	18517 Points ∼67% -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	16408 Points ∼59% -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=241, last 2 years)	11061 Points ∼100% +41%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	8267 Points ∼75% +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	8065 Points ∼73% +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H	7840 Points ∼71% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	7837 Points ∼71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (7084 - 7891, n=10)	7445 Points ∼67% -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	7057 Points ∼64% -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	6219 Points ∼56% -21%

Gaming performance

The Beast brings all the latest games at Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings smoothly onto the screen. Higher resolutions can also be supported by connecting an appropriate monitor - but you may have to make some compromises in terms of quality settings. "Turbo Mode" doesn't lead to an increase in frame rates.

Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (22.2 - 304, n=11, last 2 years)	181.4 fps ∼100% +24%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	155.4 fps ∼86% +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	151 fps ∼83% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	146.4 fps ∼81%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (130.2 - 146.4, n=4)	137.2 fps ∼76% -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	124.4 fps ∼69% -15%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=236, last 2 years)	107.1 fps ∼100% +16%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	92.5 fps ∼86%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	90.8 fps ∼85% -2%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	87.8 (68^min) fps ∼82% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	80.9 (75^min - 90^max) fps ∼76% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (62.7 - 92.5, n=10)	75.1 fps ∼70% -19%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	68.5 (52^min) fps ∼64% -26%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	67.5 (61^min - 75^max) fps ∼63% -27%

Horizon Zero Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultimate Quality
Average of class Gaming (108.3 - 163, n=7, last 2 years)	128.8 fps ∼100% +38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	98 (32^min - 175^max) fps ∼76% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	93 (42^min - 164^max) fps ∼72%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	93 fps ∼72% 0%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	77 fps ∼60% -17%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	62 fps ∼48% -33%

Serious Sam 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra (DX12) AA:2xMS
Average of class Gaming (42.5 - 103, n=6, last 2 years)	79.8 fps ∼100% +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	72.5 (15.8^min, 21.9^P0.1, 44.1^P1 - 135^max) fps ∼91% +7%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	71.1 (2.42^min, 32.4^P1 - 130^max) fps ∼89% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	67.7 (8.28^min, 19.1^P0.1, 35.5^P1 - 124^max) fps ∼85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	67.7 fps ∼85% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	59.8 (17.7^min, 33.1^P1 - 118^max) fps ∼75% -12%

Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming (18 - 127, n=19, last 2 years)	77 fps ∼100% +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	59.3 (35.6^min, 39.1^P0.1, 47.1^P1 - 99.5^max) fps ∼77% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	59 (21^min, 26^P0.1, 44^P1 - 95^max) fps ∼77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	59 fps ∼77% 0%

Dirt 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average of class Gaming (44.9 - 117, n=13, last 2 years)	86.1 fps ∼100% +32%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	65.1 (49.9^min, 52.3^P0.1, 55.3^P1 - 88.3^max) fps ∼76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	65.1 fps ∼76% 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	45.5 (35^min, 36.3^P0.1, 37.6^P1 - 59.4^max) fps ∼53% -30%

In order to verify whether the frame rates remain largely constant over a prolonged period of time, we let the game The Witcher 3 run for about 60 minutes at Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings. The character is not moved. A drop in frame rates wasn't found.