Schenker XMG Neo 17 (2020, Tongfang GM7MPHS) Review: Overboost unleashes the Core-i7 processor

Full speed ahead. The Neo 17 brings all the current computer games smoothly to the very responsive 17.3-inch screen (FHD, IPS, 240 Hz). The level of equipment is also right: a mechanical keyboard, 32 GB of working memory (dual-channel mode), an NVMe SSD (1 TB), and a Thunderbolt 3 connection are onboard. However, the battery life does not inspire enthusiasm.

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Brian Burriston (translated by Mark Riege), Published 11/17/2020 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

With the XMG Neo 17, Schenker offers a 17.3-inch gaming notebook that is equipped with powerful hardware. The test unit that was made available to us is run by a Core i7-10875H octa-core processor and a GeForce RTX-2070 Super GPU. The competitors include the Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54, the MSI GL75 10SFR, the Asus Strix G17 G712LWS, and the Aorus 17G XB.

Since the device shares an identical build with its predecessor, we will not discuss the case, connection equipment, input devices, or speakers again, except where there are some differences. You can find the corresponding information in our review of the Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Tongfang GK7CP7S).

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake

Processor

Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1380 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 27.21.14.5638 (Nvidia 456.38), Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR4 3200, dual-channel mode, two memory banks (both in use)

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE HF NE173FHM-NZ1, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM470

Storage

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB

, 2x M.2-2280 (1x NVMe, 1x NVMe/SATA), RAID 0/1, 875 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC274 @ Intel Comet Point-H PCH - cAVS

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: microphone port, combined headset port, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 27.45 x 395.7 x 260.8 ( = 1.08 x 15.58 x 10.27 in)

Battery

62.32 Wh, 4100 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 15.2 V

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: mechanical, Keyboard Light: yes, USB stick with drivers, USB-C-to-DisplayPort adapter, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.6 kg ( = 91.71 oz / 5.73 pounds), Power Supply: 690 g ( = 24.34 oz / 1.52 pounds)

Price

2349 Euro

Links

Schenker homepage
Schenker notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.8 %	11/2020	Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	2.6 kg	27.45 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
83.6 %	10/2020	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.8 kg	25 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
83.5 %	08/2020	MSI GL75 10SFR i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.6 kg	28 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
83.1 %	10/2020	Asus Strix G17 G712LWS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	2.8 kg	26.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.5 %	05/2020	Aorus 17G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.7 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Equipment - Neo 17 now with Thunderbolt 3

In terms of the connections, some things have changed compared to the predecessor model: the two Mini DisplayPorts have been replaced with a Thunderbolt 3 connection (DisplayPort-via-USB-C is supported). According to Schenker, you can connect two monitors (in series/MST) to the TB3 connection. A USB-Type-C-to-DisplayPort adapter is included. In addition, the USB 2.0 connection was upgraded to a USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A) connection.

Size Comparison

Aorus 17G XB Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 MSI GL75 10SFR Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 DIN A4 ❌

Connection Equipment

Left side: cable lock slot, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A), microphone port, audio combo port

Right side: storage card reader (SD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A)

Back: Thunderbolt 3, HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, power

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17G XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	212 MB/s ∼100% +165%
Average of class Gaming (48.5 - 209, n=91, last 2 years)	105.6 MB/s ∼50% +32%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	80 MB/s ∼38%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	79 MB/s ∼37% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	79 MB/s ∼37% -1%
MSI GL75 10SFR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	18 MB/s ∼8% -77%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 17G XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	247 MB/s ∼100% +187%
Average of class Gaming (72 - 269, n=82, last 2 years)	129.1 MB/s ∼52% +50%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	88 MB/s ∼36% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	86 MB/s ∼35% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	86 MB/s ∼35%
MSI GL75 10SFR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	23.7 MB/s ∼10% -72%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1355 (1311^min - 1381^max) MBit/s ∼100% +24%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1340 MBit/s ∼99% +23%
Aorus 17G XB Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1260 MBit/s ∼93% +16%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1190 MBit/s ∼88% +9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s ∼86% +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1160 MBit/s ∼86% +6%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1090 MBit/s ∼80%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	674 MBit/s ∼50% -38%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1420 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1390 MBit/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1370 MBit/s ∼96% -1%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1280 MBit/s ∼90% -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s ∼89% -9%
Aorus 17G XB Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1260 MBit/s ∼89% -9%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1257 (1082^min - 1351^max) MBit/s ∼89% -10%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	663 MBit/s ∼47% -52%

ColorChecker Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake: 14.95 ∆E min: 8.47 - max: 20.89 ∆E

Display - 240 Hz IPS panel

The matte 17.3-inch display of the Neo 17 offers a native resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels. The brightness (305.4 cd/m²) and contrast (1022:1) turn out good. The 240-Hz panel delivers short response times. Another positive point is the lack of any PWM flickering.


318 cd/m²	312 cd/m²	320 cd/m²
304 cd/m²	327 cd/m²	302 cd/m²
286 cd/m²	290 cd/m²	290 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE HF NE173FHM-NZ1

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 327 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 305.4 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 327 cd/m²
Contrast: 1022:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 0.89
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake BOE HF NE173FHM-NZ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Schenker XMG Neo 17 BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 LG LP173WFG-SPB1 (LGD0615), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	MSI GL75 10SFR Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Asus Strix G17 G712LWS LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Aorus 17G XB AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		-6%	-6%	-8%	-6%	-5%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	69.4	65.2 -6%	64.6 -7%	62.6 -10%	63.9 -8%	65.2 -6%	70.6 2%
sRGB Coverage	99.2	92.2 -7%	95.6 -4%	94.3 -5%	96.2 -3%	96.8 -2%	97.2 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.9	66.5 -6%	65.6 -7%	64.7 -9%	66 -7%	66.4 -6%	72.8 3%
Response Times		-81%	-63%	-61%	-26%	-48%	-68%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)	18.8 ?(9.6, 9.2) -74%	15.6 ?(8, 7.6) -44%	16.4 ?(8, 8.4) -52%	12 ?(6, 6) -11%	14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6) -33%	16 ?(7.6, 8.4) -48%
Response Time Black / White *	6.4 ?(3, 3.2)	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -88%	11.6 ?(6, 5.6) -81%	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2) -69%	9 ?(5, 4) -41%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) -63%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -88%
PWM Frequency		971 ?(99)		24510 ?(19)	208 ?(30)
Screen		-5%	-15%	23%	1%	-8%	17%
Brightness middle	327	304 -7%	318 -3%	322 -2%	333 2%	323 -1%	293 -10%
Brightness	305	289 -5%	286 -6%	308 1%	309 1%	300 -2%	285 -7%
Brightness Distribution	87	90 3%	86 -1%	92 6%	86 -1%	89 2%	95 9%
Black Level *	0.32	0.26 19%	0.23 28%	0.18 44%	0.215 33%	0.31 3%	0.24 25%
Contrast	1022	1169 14%	1383 35%	1789 75%	1549 52%	1042 2%	1221 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.16	2.65 -23%	3.89 -80%	1.53 29%	1.98 8%	3.01 -39%	1.27 41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.14	6.11 -0%	10.56 -72%	3.14 49%	4.34 29%	7.65 -25%	2.24 64%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.89	1.5 -69%	1.03 -16%	0.74 17%	2.01 -126%	1 -12%	1.06 -19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.7	2.75 26%	5.3 -43%	1.9 49%	2.97 20%	3.8 -3%	1.34 64%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.46 ^89%	2.46 ^89%	2.144 ^103%	2.41 ^91%	2.154 ^102%	2.38 ^92%
CCT	6799 ^96%	6763 ^96%	7462 ^87%	6809 ^95%	6750 ^96%	7507 ^87%	6542 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	71	60 -15%	60 -15%	65 -8%	61 -14%	66 -7%	73 3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	92 -1%	96 3%	87 -6%	96 3%	90 -3%	94 1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-31% / -15%	-28% / -20%	-15% / 7%	-10% / -4%	-20% / -12%	-17% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.6 ms rise
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19035 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The display shows a good color reproduction. With a color deviation of 2.16, the target of Delta-E smaller than 3 is reached. The display does not suffer from a blue tint. A calibration still brings additional improvements with the color deviation dropping to 0.89 and the grayscale display becoming more balanced. The AdobeRGB (71%) and sRGB (93%) color spaces are not covered completely.

Schenker has equipped the laptop with an IPS panel with stable viewing angles, allowing you to read the screen contents from any angle. Outdoors you can read the display contents when the sunlight is not too bright.

The Neo 17 outdoors (under a completely overcast sky).

Performance - Sufficient for the next few years

With the Neo 17, Schenker offers a 17.3-inch gaming laptop that brings all the current games to the screen smoothly and also strikes a good figure in other application areas. You would have to pay about 2349 Euros (~$2781) for our test unit. The device can be individually configured in the Schenker online shop.

Test Conditions

The preinstalled Control Center provides an overview of the system status and allows adjusting the keyboard illumination as well as choosing a performance profile ("Balanced," "Enthusiast," or "Overboost"). We ran our test with the "Enthusiast" profile and automatic fan control activated. We also ran several benchmarks with the "Overboost" profile activated. You can find the results in the comparison charts.

Processor

The Core i7-10875H octa-core processor (Comet Lake) runs at a basic clock speed of 2.3 GHz, which can be increased via Turbo to 4.3 GHz (eight cores) or up to 5.1 GHz (single core). Hyperthreading (two threads running per core) is supported.

The CPU runs through the multi-thread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark at clock speeds between 2.2 and 4.2 GHz and the single-thread test with between 4 and 5.1 GHz. In battery operation, the speed is between 2.7 and 2.8 GHz (multi-thread) and between 2.4 and 4.2 GHz (single-thread).

We evaluate whether the CPU Turbo is also used constantly in mains operation by running the multi-thread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark for at least 30 minutes in a constant loop. Towards the third run, the results drop slightly but then remain at a constant level. The Turbo is used, and the "Overboost" mode allows increasing the Turbo clock speeds significantly.

Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1380 (1371.22-1443.31)

Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H; Overboost: Ø1766 (1751.01-1787.71)

Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H; Balanced: Ø1069 (1056.27-1244.13)

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1290 (1277.75-1322.62)

MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1084 (1049.24-1191.17)

Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1296 (1270.16-1339.9)

Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1613 (1597.83-1832.68)

Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø991 (962.32-1086.1)

Schenker XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø969 (904.79-1042.12)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Overboost)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Balanced)

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

210 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1443 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

142.1 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=241, last 2 years)	251 Points ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	210 Points ∼84%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	208 Points ∼83% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37)	204 Points ∼81% -3%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	203 Points ∼81% -3%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	202 Points ∼80% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	195 Points ∼78% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	192 Points ∼76% -9%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	191 Points ∼76% -9%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points ∼69% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=240, last 2 years)	2609 Points ∼100% +81%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	1833 (1597.83^min - 1832.68^max) Points ∼70% +27%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	1788 Points ∼69% +24%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38)	1554 Points ∼60% +8%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	1443 Points ∼55%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	1344 Points ∼52% -7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	1323 Points ∼51% -8%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	1191 Points ∼46% -17%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	1086 Points ∼42% -25%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H	1042 Points ∼40% -28%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	365.6 Seconds * ∼100% -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	351 Seconds * ∼96% -9%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	347 Seconds * ∼95% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30)	327 Seconds * ∼89% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	321 Seconds * ∼88%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	290 Seconds * ∼79% +10%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	258.6 Seconds * ∼71% +19%
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=238, last 2 years)	234 Seconds * ∼64% +27%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=235, last 2 years)	5817 MIPS ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	5594 MIPS ∼96%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	5556 MIPS ∼96% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31)	5360 MIPS ∼92% -4%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	5345 MIPS ∼92% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	5190 MIPS ∼89% -7%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	5169 MIPS ∼89% -8%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	5118 MIPS ∼88% -9%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=234, last 2 years)	65912 MIPS ∼100% +49%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	49474 MIPS ∼75% +12%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	46702 MIPS ∼71% +6%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	44252 MIPS ∼67%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (29844 - 49562, n=31)	43117 MIPS ∼65% -3%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	36718 MIPS ∼56% -17%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	35667 MIPS ∼54% -19%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	31612 MIPS ∼48% -29%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=237, last 2 years)	646 Points ∼100% +27%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	507 Points ∼78%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	501 Points ∼78% -1%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	494 Points ∼76% -3%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	486 Points ∼75% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (430 - 524, n=32)	486 Points ∼75% -4%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	480 Points ∼74% -5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	463 Points ∼72% -9%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	434 Points ∼67% -14%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=237, last 2 years)	6145 Points ∼100% +85%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	4059 Points ∼66% +22%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	3823 Points ∼62% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1986 - 4176, n=32)	3455 Points ∼56% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	3323 Points ∼54%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	3247 Points ∼53% -2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	3144 Points ∼51% -5%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	2961 Points ∼48% -11%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 Intel Core i7-9750H	2280 Points ∼37% -31%

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=233, last 2 years)	1689 Points ∼100% +25%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	1346 Points ∼80%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	1321 Points ∼78% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29)	1304 Points ∼77% -3%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	1293 Points ∼77% -4%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	1290 Points ∼76% -4%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	1290 Points ∼76% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	1262 Points ∼75% -6%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=233, last 2 years)	11605 Points ∼100% +57%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	8412 Points ∼72% +14%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	8139 Points ∼70% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29)	7734 Points ∼67% +5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	7373 Points ∼64%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	6370 Points ∼55% -14%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	6349 Points ∼55% -14%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	6317 Points ∼54% -14%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=238, last 2 years)	18.2 fps ∼100% +53%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	14.1 fps ∼77% +18%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	12.8 fps ∼70% +8%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	11.9 fps ∼65%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)	11.7 fps ∼64% -2%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	10.8 fps ∼59% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	10.4 fps ∼57% -13%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	9.99 fps ∼55% -16%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	55.4 s * ∼100% -7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	54.3 s * ∼98% -5%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	53.1 s * ∼96% -2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	51.9 s * ∼94%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=234, last 2 years)	50.8 s * ∼92% +2%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	50.3 s * ∼91% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)	50.3 s * ∼91% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	41.93 s * ∼76% +19%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.614 sec * ∼100% -12%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H	0.609 sec * ∼99% -12%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H	0.585 sec * ∼95% -7%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H	0.583 sec * ∼95% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)	0.582 sec * ∼95% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	0.566 sec * ∼92% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H	0.546 sec * ∼89%
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=234, last 2 years)	0.503 sec * ∼82% +8%

* ... smaller is better

System Performance

The system runs quickly and smoothly, and we did not run into any problems. The PC-Mark results confirm that the laptop offers sufficient computing performance for all the usual application areas.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4405 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		6494 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5803 points
PCMark 10 Score		5747 points
Help

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=193, last 2 years)	7268 Points ∼72% +26%
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6571 Points ∼65% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (5447 - 6364, n=4)	5873 Points ∼58% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5747 Points ∼57%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5454 Points ∼54% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	5411 Points ∼53% -6%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5262 Points ∼52% -8%
MSI GL75 10SFR GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Lite-On CL1-8D512	5179 Points ∼51% -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	5109 Points ∼50% -11%

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (3570 - 6657, n=41, last 2 years)	5107 Points ∼77% +16%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	4412 Points ∼66% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	4405 Points ∼66%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	4291 Points ∼64% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (3561 - 4405, n=2)	3983 Points ∼60% -10%
MSI GL75 10SFR GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Lite-On CL1-8D512	3372 Points ∼51% -23%

DPC Latencies

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6058 μs * ∼100% -1245%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	3226 μs * ∼53% -616%
MSI GL75 10SFR GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Lite-On CL1-8D512	1453 μs * ∼24% -223%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	506 μs * ∼8% -12%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	450.4 μs * ∼7%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution

One of the two M.2-2280 slots (1x NVMe, 1x NVMe/SATA; RAID 0/1) is equipped with a 1-TB NVMe SSD from Samsung, which delivers excellent transfer rates.

While generally, the laptop still offers space for a 2.5-inch storage medium, because our test unit is equipped with the larger of the two available batteries (46 Wh, 62 Wh), the battery is taking up the additional space.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3557 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3308 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 609 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 525 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2130 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2671 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 158.6 MB/s

	Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	Schenker XMG Neo 17 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00	MSI GL75 10SFR Lite-On CL1-8D512	Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	Aorus 17G XB Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB	Average of class Gaming
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-31%	-10%	-28%	-25%	-9%	-2%	30%
Write 4K	158.6	92.7 -42%	141.9 -11%	132.2 -17%	141.1 -11%	123.4 -22%	159.5 ?(92.5 - 238, n=17) 1%	208 ?(50.6 - 363, n=159, last 2 years) 31%
Read 4K	53.6	41.4 -23%	48.75 -9%	45.62 -15%	60.9 14%	45.02 -16%	51.5 ?(40.5 - 76.7, n=17) -4%	70.1 ?(23.7 - 116.8, n=159, last 2 years) 31%
Write Seq	2671	1363 -49%	2734 2%	1511 -43%	1681 -37%	2526 -5%	2660 ?(1197 - 3241, n=17) 0%	3263 ?(93.1 - 9867, n=128, last 2 years) 22%
Read Seq	2130	1259 -41%	1921 -10%	1890 -11%	1602 -25%	2062 -3%	2390 ?(1018 - 3037, n=17) 12%	3225 ?(467 - 7955, n=128, last 2 years) 51%
Write 4K Q32T1	525	289.7 -45%	422.6 -20%	375.9 -28%	406.6 -23%	497.9 -5%	456 ?(289 - 569, n=17) -13%	545 ?(184.6 - 1656, n=158, last 2 years) 4%
Read 4K Q32T1	609	337.5 -45%	509 -16%	525 -14%	470.2 -23%	579 -5%	548 ?(332 - 715, n=17) -10%	719 ?(291 - 6332, n=158, last 2 years) 18%
Write Seq Q32T1	3308	3332 1%	3055 -8%	1505 -55%	1759 -47%	2982 -10%	3300 ?(3227 - 3339, n=17) 0%	4142 ?(436 - 14960, n=159, last 2 years) 25%
Read Seq Q32T1	3557	3477 -2%	3257 -8%	2008 -44%	1932 -46%	3440 -3%	3550 ?(3477 - 3571, n=17) 0%	5611 ?(958 - 18690, n=159, last 2 years) 58%
AS SSD		-7%	-12%	-63%	-42%	-16%	6%	11%
Seq Read	2882	2359 -18%	2828 -2%	1923 -33%	1778 -38%	1791 -38%	2802 ?(2173 - 3002, n=17) -3%	4364 ?(925 - 12763, n=182, last 2 years) 51%
Seq Write	2764	2469 -11%	2677 -3%	1065 -61%	1478 -47%	2193 -21%	2641 ?(2469 - 2858, n=17) -4%	3175 ?(308 - 11316, n=182, last 2 years) 15%
4K Read	55.9	53.5 -4%	39.94 -29%	25.43 -55%	49.76 -11%	50.7 -9%	51 ?(27.9 - 71.1, n=17) -9%	64.7 ?(20 - 108, n=182, last 2 years) 16%
4K Write	129.4	117.6 -9%	100.9 -22%	101.9 -21%	117.9 -9%	116.8 -10%	132.3 ?(86.3 - 188.1, n=17) 2%	190.9 ?(18 - 364, n=182, last 2 years) 48%
4K-64 Read	1793	1579 -12%	1562 -13%	477.9 -73%	591 -67%	1525 -15%	1826 ?(1579 - 2340, n=17) 2%	1876 ?(216 - 3395, n=182, last 2 years) 5%
4K-64 Write	2140	2048 -4%	1867 -13%	563 -74%	875 -59%	1958 -9%	2147 ?(708 - 2512, n=17) 0%	2315 ?(243 - 4381, n=182, last 2 years) 8%
Access Time Read *	0.054	0.048 11%		0.053 2%	0.082 -52%	0.07 -30%	0.04594 ?(0.031 - 0.068, n=17) 15%	0.05452 ?(0.02 - 0.23, n=177, last 2 years) -1%
Access Time Write *	0.03	0.03 -0%	0.037 -23%	0.126 -320%	0.041 -37%	0.032 -7%	0.031 ?(0.02 - 0.054, n=17) -3%	0.05537 ?(0.012 - 0.425, n=182, last 2 years) -85%
Score Read	2137	1869 -13%	1885 -12%	696 -67%	818 -62%	1755 -18%	2157 ?(1846 - 2708, n=17) 1%	2377 ?(389 - 3980, n=182, last 2 years) 11%
Score Write	2546	2413 -5%	2236 -12%	771 -70%	1140 -55%	2294 -10%	2544 ?(1134 - 2923, n=17) 0%	2817 ?(338 - 5157, n=182, last 2 years) 11%
Score Total	5774	5248 -9%	5076 -12%	1785 -69%	2377 -59%	4972 -14%	5797 ?(4450 - 6452, n=17) 0%	6361 ?(910 - 10745, n=182, last 2 years) 10%
Copy ISO MB/s	2189		1870 -15%	1710 -22%	1495 -32%		2124 ?(1710 - 2383, n=11) -3%	2272 ?(201 - 5781, n=143, last 2 years) 4%
Copy Program MB/s	625		545 -13%	465.3 -26%	446 -29%		738 ?(391 - 2694, n=11) 18%	619 ?(43.1 - 1407, n=143, last 2 years) -1%
Copy Game MB/s	936		1083 16%	1042 11%	697 -26%		1588 ?(802 - 5984, n=11) 70%	1450 ?(92.7 - 3532, n=143, last 2 years) 55%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-19% / -17%	-11% / -11%	-46% / -50%	-34% / -36%	-13% / -13%	2% / 3%	21% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Speed Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics Card

The GeForce RTX-2070 Super graphics core (Turing) belongs to the powerful GPU high end, and it is accompanied by fast GDDR6 storage (8192 GB). The 3D-Mark results range at a normal level for the GPU used. The "Overboost" mode leads to an increase in the graphics performance. The UHD Graphics-630 GPU integrated into the processor is active, and the laptop uses Nvidia' s Optimus graphics switching solution.

It is not absolutely necessary to use Optimus. The BIOS of the laptop offers the three options "MSHybrid" (= Optimus), "iGPU Only" (= UHD Graphics 630), and "dGPU Only" (= 2070 Super). So there is an option to connect the display directly to the GeForce GPU.

3DMark 11 Performance		24031 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		46745 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18229 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		7943 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)	36561 Points ∼100% +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (28207 - 31050, n=8)	29416 Points ∼80% +3%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	29011 Points ∼79% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H	28502 Points ∼78%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	27955 Points ∼76% -2%
MSI GL75 10SFR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	26401 Points ∼72% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	25248 Points ∼69% -11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	20697 Points ∼57% -27%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	19513 Points ∼53% -32%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=239, last 2 years)	27049 Points ∼100% +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (18662 - 23042, n=12)	21824 Points ∼81% +2%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	21532 Points ∼80% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H	21327 Points ∼79%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	21004 Points ∼78% -2%
MSI GL75 10SFR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	20444 Points ∼76% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	19800 Points ∼73% -7%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	16408 Points ∼61% -23%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	15398 Points ∼57% -28%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	134954 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H	131420 Points ∼97%
MSI GL75 10SFR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	125884 Points ∼93% -4%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	123700 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 192520, n=166, last 2 years)	121961 Points ∼90% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (75986 - 141778, n=7)	121959 Points ∼90% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	111855 Points ∼83% -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	103797 Points ∼77% -21%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	101947 Points ∼76% -22%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=239, last 2 years)	10737 Points ∼100% +37%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	8267 Points ∼77% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (7840 - 8657, n=12)	8238 Points ∼77% +5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H (Overboost)	7931 Points ∼74% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H	7840 Points ∼73%
MSI GL75 10SFR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	7608 Points ∼71% -3%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	7358 Points ∼69% -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	6219 Points ∼58% -21%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	5660 Points ∼53% -28%

Gaming Performance

The Neo 17 brings all the current games smoothly to the screen in in Full-HD resolution and at maximum quality settings, and the hardware is also able to handle higher resolutions (if you connect the corresponding monitor). The "Overboost" mode does not lead to any increase in the frame rates (see comparison chart).

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 217, n=237, last 2 years)	103.4 fps ∼100% +14%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	90.8 fps ∼88%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	87.8 (68^min) fps ∼85% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (76.3 - 94.6, n=8)	87.3 fps ∼84% -4%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	79.9 fps ∼77% -12%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	73.6 (62^min) fps ∼71% -19%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	73 fps ∼71% -20%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	68.5 (52^min) fps ∼66% -25%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 XNE17M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	56.9 (48^min) fps ∼55% -37%

Serious Sam 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra (DX12) AA:2xMS
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (71.1 - 82.1, n=4)	75.9 fps ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	72.5 (15.8^min, 21.9^P0.1, 44.1^P1 - 135^max) fps ∼96%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	71.1 (2.42^min, 32.4^P1 - 130^max) fps ∼94% -2%
Average of class Gaming (39.1 - 103, n=13, last 2 years)	70.9 fps ∼93% -2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	59.8 (17.7^min, 33.1^P1 - 118^max) fps ∼79% -18%

Mafia Definitive Edition - 1920x1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming (52.7 - 187.9, n=19, last 2 years)	102 fps ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	96.6 fps ∼95%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (92 - 96.6, n=2)	94.3 fps ∼92% -2%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	92 fps ∼90% -5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	67.1 fps ∼66% -31%

Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming (22.2 - 304, n=13, last 2 years)	173.2 fps ∼100% +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (151 - 190.4, n=5)	166 fps ∼96% +10%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	155.4 fps ∼90% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	151 fps ∼87%
MSI GL75 10SFR Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	145.1 fps ∼84% -4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	124.4 fps ∼72% -18%

Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming (18 - 127, n=23, last 2 years)	72.4 fps ∼100% +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (59.3 - 64, n=4)	61.1 fps ∼84% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (Overboost)	60 (31^min, 42^P0.1, 47^P1 - 112^max) fps ∼83% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	59.3 (35.6^min, 39.1^P0.1, 47.1^P1 - 99.5^max) fps ∼82%

Dirt 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average of class Gaming (44.2 - 117, n=24, last 2 years)	78.7 fps ∼100% +73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (45.5 - 68.6, n=3)	59.3 fps ∼75% +30%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	45.5 (35^min, 36.3^P0.1, 37.6^P1 - 59.4^max) fps ∼58%

Flight Simulator 2020 - 1920x1080 Ultra AA:TAA AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (42.7 - 74, n=6, last 2 years)	55.4 fps ∼100% +32%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (Overboost)	43.8 fps ∼79% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	42.1 fps ∼76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (37.8 - 43.8, n=3)	41.2 fps ∼74% -2%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	37.8 fps ∼68% -10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	30.3 fps ∼55% -28%

In order to evaluate whether the frame rates remain mostly constant over long time periods, we run the game "The Witcher 3" for about 60 minutes in Full-HD resolution and at maximum quality settings, without moving the gaming character. We do not notice any drop in the frame rates.