Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900H debut: Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P laptop review

A Razer Blade 17 without the Razer Blade name. Can you really cram both a GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Core i9 CPU into an ultrathin form factor without needing to throttle performance? Surely, there must be some catch. We dig deep into the GM7AG8P barebones to find out what cut corners users can expect, if any.

Intel has finally responded to AMD's impressive mobile Zen 3 H-series with its 12th gen Alder Lake-H platform. Schenker and Uniwill Technology have provided for us one of the first laptops to carry the 12th gen Core i9-12900H based on the GM7AG8P chassis. Schenker have yet to publicly offer this exact configuration as of this writing, but retail options may come at a later date.

Our test unit comes with the aforementioned Core i9 CPU, new GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GPU, DDR5-4800 RAM, and 1440p (QHD) IPS 165 Hz display. This review will focus on performance to show what users can expect out of the new Intel CPU and Nvidia GPU when compared to their respective last generation counterparts.

Please note that the Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P chassis is not the XMG Neo 17 or XMG Pro 17. It may, however, be considered for a future XMG model.

More Schenker reviews:

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 75 W PL2 / Short Burst, 75 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1590 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz ( including 175 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 511.65, MSHybrid
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800, PC5-38400, 40-39-39-76, Quad-Channel
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, Controller: BOE0977, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm earphones, Card Reader: MicroSD
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 394 x 260.8 ( = 0.79 x 15.51 x 10.27 in)
Battery
91 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Control Center, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.264 kg ( = 79.86 oz / 4.99 pounds), Power Supply: 983 g ( = 34.67 oz / 2.17 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.9 %
02/2022
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm17.30"2560x1440
87.4 %
09/2021
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg27.45 mm17.30"2560x1440
89 %
09/2021
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3.2 kg21.4 mm17.30"3840x2160
89.4 %
09/2021
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.2 %
09/2021
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg20 mm17.30"3840x2160
87.8 %
09/2021
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.81 mm17.30"2560x1440

Case — Typical Tongfang

Formerly known as Tongfang, Uniwill Technology utilizes similar materials and designs across many of its gaming laptops and mobile workstations. In this case, the GM7AG8P has a lot in common with the XMG Neo 17 and XMG Pro 17 in terms of features, rigidity, and texture even if their dimensions, appearances, and sizes are slightly different. Overall dimensions are nearly identical to the Razer Blade Pro 17 while weighing 500 grams less mostly due to the lack of a vapor chamber cooler for the GM7AG8P.

(March 1, 2022 update: We incorrectly stated that the chassis was mostly ABS plastic and have revised our caption to read magnesium alloy.)

Chassis is mostly magnesium alloy on the LCD back cover and keyboard deck
Chassis is mostly magnesium alloy on the LCD back cover and keyboard deck
Fingerprints accumulate relatively easily on the matte outer lid and palm rests
Fingerprints accumulate relatively easily on the matte outer lid and palm rests
Hinge rigidity is decent but not as strong as the larger hinges on the Asus ROG or TUF series
Hinge rigidity is decent but not as strong as the larger hinges on the Asus ROG or TUF series
Lid opened to maximum angle (~130 degrees)
Lid opened to maximum angle (~130 degrees)
Dedicated Turbo button for quickly toggling fan speed
Dedicated Turbo button for quickly toggling fan speed
Bottom panel has much more surface variation in contrast to the minimalist Razer Blade Pro 17
Bottom panel has much more surface variation in contrast to the minimalist Razer Blade Pro 17

Size Comparison

395.7 mm / 15.6 inch 260.8 mm / 10.3 inch 27.45 mm / 1.081 inch 2.6 kg5.67 lbs399.23 mm / 15.7 inch 299.49 mm / 11.8 inch 21.4 mm / 0.843 inch 3.2 kg7.09 lbs396 mm / 15.6 inch 259 mm / 10.2 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2.4 kg5.26 lbs395 mm / 15.6 inch 260 mm / 10.2 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.8 kg6.06 lbs394 mm / 15.5 inch 260.8 mm / 10.3 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2.3 kg4.99 lbs393.95 mm / 15.5 inch 260.8 mm / 10.3 inch 19.81 mm / 0.78 inch 2.3 kg4.97 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity — Thunderbolt 4... Sometimes

Port options are essentially identical to the Schenker XMG Neo 17 but with a couple of important differences. The GM7AG8P uses a smaller MicroSD card reader, for example, while Thunderbolt 4 and external G-Sync/Adaptive Sync compatibility will only be enabled when running in MSHybrid mode.

Front: No ports
Front: No ports
Right: MicroSD reader, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen. 1
Right: MicroSD reader, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen. 1
Rear: USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 (5V/3A output), HDMI 2.1, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45, AC adapter
Rear: USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 (5V/3A output), HDMI 2.1, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45, AC adapter
Left: Kensington Lock, USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm mic, 3.5 mm headphones
Left: Kensington Lock, USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm mic, 3.5 mm headphones

SD Card Reader — MicroSD Only

The system integrates a MicroSD reader despite the large 17.3-inch form factor. Additionally, unlike most other MicroSD readers, the one on the GM7AG8P is not spring-loaded and a fully inserted card must also be inserted upside-down. Transfer rates are average as it takes around 15 seconds to move 1 GB of images from our UHS-II test card compared to half that on the latest Razer Blade 17.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
208.9 MB/s +200%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
196 MB/s +181%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
174.7 MB/s +151%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
74.8 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Core i7-11800H
72.1 (72.11min - 72.11max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro V60)
69.7 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
245.4 MB/s +210%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
199 MB/s +151%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
190.1 MB/s +140%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Core i7-11800H
91.2 MB/s +15%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
88.3 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro V60)
79.2 MB/s

Communication

Removable M.2 Intel AX201 WLAN module. We recorded stable performance in both directions when paired to our Netgear RAX200 test router
Removable M.2 Intel AX201 WLAN module. We recorded stable performance in both directions when paired to our Netgear RAX200 test router
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1499 (1390min - 1622max) MBit/s +5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1422 (1091min - 1492max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1239 (1143min - 1322max) MBit/s -13%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1220 (1110min - 1275max) MBit/s -14%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1138 (921min - 1230max) MBit/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
963 (300min - 1245max) MBit/s -32%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1491 (1415min - 1540max) MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1468 (1377min - 1515max) MBit/s
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1416 (1350min - 1459max) MBit/s -4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1328 (642min - 1384max) MBit/s -10%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1242 (1169min - 1337max) MBit/s -15%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
852 (602min - 1058max) MBit/s -42%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1468 (1377-1515)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1422 (1091-1492)

Webcam

Camera quality is poor despite the 2 MP sensor. Images are grainier than expected even by the already low laptop webcam standards.

IR is built-in for Windows Hello support.

ColorChecker
17 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
31 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
10 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P: 12.04 ∆E min: 1.28 - max: 30.98 ∆E

Maintenance

The bottom panel is secured by 10 Philips screws for easy servicing. Users have direct access to both M.2 2280 storage bays, both SODIMM slots, the main batteries, and the WLAN module.

Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
XMG Neo 17 for comparison
XMG Neo 17 for comparison

Accessories and Warranty

There are no extras in the box other than the AC adapter and paperwork. XMG offers two-year warranty as standard.

Input Devices

Keyboard

The GM7AG8P uses traditional membrane-based keys more akin to the XMG Core 17 or XMG Pro 17 rather than the mechanical keys of the XMG Neo 17. Unlike the traditional keys on the XMG Core 17 or XMG Pro 17, however, the keys here are physically larger to be easier to type on. Key feedback is uniform with relatively quiet clatter between all keys, but we do wish that travel and feedback could have been firmer overall.

Touchpad

The clickpad is nearly the same size as the one on the Blade Pro 17 (13.3 x 7.6 cm vs. 13 x 8 cm) but with a firmer and louder click when pressed. Gliding properties are smooth with little to no sticking even when moving the cursor at slower speeds.

Travel is shallow when pressing on the clickpad, but the sharp feedback makes up for it
Travel is shallow when pressing on the clickpad, but the sharp feedback makes up for it
Keys feel slightly shallower and lighter than the keys on the MSI GS series
Keys feel slightly shallower and lighter than the keys on the MSI GS series
Similar key layout as many other Schenker laptops but with larger key caps
Similar key layout as many other Schenker laptops but with larger key caps
Quad-zone RGB lighting comes standard. There is no per-key RGB lighting
Quad-zone RGB lighting comes standard. There is no per-key RGB lighting

Display — Fast and Colorful

Our GM7AG8P test unit is using the exact same BOE0977 display controller and NE173QHM-NY2 IPS panel as found on last year's Schenker XMG Neo 17 GM7TG8S. Thus, the viewing experience and display attributes between these two laptops are very similar including the 1440p native resolution, fast response times, ~1000:1 contrast ratio, 165 Hz refresh rate, and full sRGB coverage. Maximum brightness continues to be just under 400 nits as well.

Backlight bleeding on our particular test unit could be improved upon as shown by our image below. Though some bleeding is to be expected from IPS, our unit would exhibit more than we would like.

Matte panel with no edge-to-edge glass or touchscreen options. A faster 240 Hz option is available
Matte panel with no edge-to-edge glass or touchscreen options. A faster 240 Hz option is available
Narrow side bezels with thicker top and bottom bezels. There is no G-Sync support on the internal display
Narrow side bezels with thicker top and bottom bezels. There is no G-Sync support on the internal display
Moderate-heavy uneven backlight bleeding along the edges and bottom left corner of the panel
Moderate-heavy uneven backlight bleeding along the edges and bottom left corner of the panel
RGB subpixel array. Slight graininess is noticeable only when looking at the screen up close
RGB subpixel array. Slight graininess is noticeable only when looking at the screen up close
374.9
cd/m²
364.5
cd/m²
355
cd/m²
366.3
cd/m²
387.1
cd/m²
359.8
cd/m²
333.4
cd/m²
369.8
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NE173QHM-NY2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 387.1 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 361.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 387.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 1210:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.67
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
BOE0977 (NE173QHM-NY2), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
AU Optronics B173ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
AUO B173ZAN06.1 (AUODE95), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display
-3%
24%
3%
-7%
2%
Display P3 Coverage
68.9
67.1
-3%
88.3
28%
71.7
4%
63
-9%
70.7
3%
sRGB Coverage
97.8
96.3
-2%
100
2%
98.8
1%
94.8
-3%
99.4
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.7
68.6
-3%
100
41%
73.6
4%
65
-8%
71.7
1%
Response Times
16%
14%
54%
47%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.8 ?(8, 6.8)
15.2
-3%
14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
3%
4.2 ?(1.6, 2.6)
72%
8.8 ?(2.8, 6)
41%
15.6 ?(8.4, 7.2)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
13.6 ?(7.6, 6)
8.8
35%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
24%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
35%
6.4 ?(2, 4.4)
53%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
12%
PWM Frequency
Screen
18%
11%
-9%
22%
9%
Brightness middle
387.1
396
2%
438.7
13%
323.3
-16%
474
22%
389.7
1%
Brightness
361
366
1%
435
20%
315
-13%
454
26%
363
1%
Brightness Distribution
86
82
-5%
91
6%
91
6%
88
2%
84
-2%
Black Level *
0.32
0.45
-41%
0.48
-50%
0.33
-3%
0.46
-44%
0.47
-47%
Contrast
1210
880
-27%
914
-24%
980
-19%
1030
-15%
829
-31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.32
1.43
67%
4.34
-0%
4.59
-6%
1.5
65%
1.93
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.58
2.2
74%
7.3
15%
10.82
-26%
5.59
35%
6.84
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.67
1.34
20%
0.72
57%
1.4
16%
0.86
49%
1.31
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.6
1.8
73%
2.4
64%
7.9
-20%
2.8
58%
2.4
64%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.4 92%
2.09 105%
2.28 96%
2.158 102%
2.12 104%
CCT
6114 106%
6489 100%
6413 101%
5941 109%
6597 99%
6658 98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
10% / 13%
16% / 14%
16% / 3%
21% / 19%
5% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3

Grayscale is not well calibrated out of the box with its relatively high average deltaE value of 6.6 due to the warm color temperature of around 6100K. Once calibrated with our X-Rite colorimeter, both grayscale and ColorChecker would improve with final average deltaE values of only 1.1 and 1.67, respectively.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 6.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast degrade only from extreme angles
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast degrade only from extreme angles

Performance — Extreme for the Size

Advanced Optimus (or Optimus 2.0) is not available meaning users will have to switch between discrete GPU and MSHybrid manually via BIOS. Additionally, keep in mind that the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GPU is set to 150 W TGP by default even though the Nvidia Control Panel states that it is capable of reaching up to 175 W. Users will have to manually set the GPU to 175 W via the included Control Center software instead.

Testing Conditions

We set our unit to the default BIOS and Control Center settings prior to running any performance benchmarks below albeit with the Turbo power profile active. We highly recommend users become familiar with Control Center as important features are toggled here.

Processor — Noticeable Gen-to-Gen Improvements

Raw CPU performance is only about 9 percent slower than the Core i9-12900HK as found on the new MSI GE76. When compared to the last generation Core i9-11900H that the Core i9-12900H directly replaces, users can expect a single-thread and multi-thread performance uptick of about 20 percent and 30 percent, respectively. This boost is enough to propel the new Intel CPU above the Ryzen 7 5800H and Ryzen 9 5900HX which are some of the fastest mobile Zen 3 CPUs.

Additional details on the Alder Lake platform can be found on our overview here.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2545 (2524.61-2567.06)
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1746 (1721.47-1773.68)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2064.09-2085.83)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake Intel Core i9-11900K: Ø2057 (2014.3-2361.09)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake Intel Core i9-10900K: Ø2359 (2290.43-2532.77)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS: Ø1835 (1810.86-1981.87)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
86.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
83.6 pt
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
82.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
77.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
73.3 pt
MSI WE76 11UM-456 -1!
Intel Core i9-11980HK
68.8 pt
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
67 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
66.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
66 pt
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
64.2 pt
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
60.9 pt
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
59.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
50.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
49.9 pt
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
43.3 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=244, last 2 years)
18832 Points +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18288 Points +10%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
16587 (14797.9min - 16587.2max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7359 - 19648, n=25)
15301 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
14066 Points -15%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
13387 Points -19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
13012 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12693 Points -23%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12476 Points -25%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12373 Points -25%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
11981 (11268.1min - 11981.1max) Points -28%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
11641 Points -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
8504 Points -49%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
8408 Points -49%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5216 Points -69%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
1920 Points
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1909 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1634 - 1921, n=25)
1822 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=242, last 2 years)
1791 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1619 Points -16%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
1613 Points -16%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1575 Points -18%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1504 Points -22%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
1503 Points -22%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1491 Points -22%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1479 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1429 Points -26%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1305 Points -32%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1225 Points -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
1208 Points -37%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=243, last 2 years)
7152 Points +12%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6849 Points +7%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
6395 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2681 - 7471, n=25)
5761 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
5055 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4925 Points -23%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
4878 Points -24%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4850 Points -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4776 Points -25%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
4456 Points -30%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
4437 Points -31%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
4304 Points -33%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
3244 Points -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
3235 Points -49%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1994 Points -69%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
736 Points
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
734 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (624 - 738, n=25)
705 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=243, last 2 years)
690 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
634 Points -14%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
622 Points -15%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
610 Points -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
581 Points -21%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points -21%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
580 Points -21%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
573 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
560 Points -24%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
506 Points -31%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
476 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
471 Points -36%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=248, last 2 years)
2986 Points +16%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2909 (2660.99min - 2908.88max) Points +13%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
2567 (2524.61min - 2567.06max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1395 - 3077, n=25)
2482 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
2361 Points -8%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
2192 (1955.32min - 2192.14max) Points -15%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
2148 (1832.59min - 2147.65max) Points -16%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2087 (2046.66min - 2087.25max) Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2086 (2064.09min - 2085.83max) Points -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2041 (1981.96min - 2041.34max) Points -20%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
1872 (1711.82min - 1871.52max) Points -27%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1853 (1809.95min - 1853.31max) Points -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
1508 (1385.57min - 1507.73max) Points -41%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1382 Points -46%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
832 (785.79min - 831.69max) Points -68%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
275 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
275 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=247, last 2 years)
265 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (235 - 277, n=26)
262 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
254 Points -8%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
244 Points -11%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
241 Points -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
239 Points -13%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
238 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
233 Points -15%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Points -18%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
222 Points -19%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
209 Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
196 Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
192 Points -30%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
581 Seconds * -206%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
326 Seconds * -72%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
326 Seconds * -72%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
270 Seconds * -42%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
250 Seconds * -32%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
249 Seconds * -31%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
247 Seconds * -30%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
246 Seconds * -29%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
242 Seconds * -27%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (160 - 451, n=25)
229 Seconds * -21%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
227 Seconds * -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=241, last 2 years)
208 Seconds * -9%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
190 Seconds *
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
181 Seconds * +5%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=241, last 2 years)
74398 MIPS +10%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
72836 MIPS +8%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
67423 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34684 - 76677, n=25)
61535 MIPS -9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
59986 MIPS -11%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
59182 MIPS -12%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
57579 MIPS -15%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
55231 MIPS -18%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
53817 MIPS -20%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
53426 MIPS -21%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
53205 MIPS -21%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
49275 MIPS -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
42138 MIPS -38%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
40876 MIPS -39%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
23768 MIPS -65%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
6174 MIPS +5%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6144 MIPS +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=242, last 2 years)
6034 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
5885 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5302 - 6289, n=25)
5835 MIPS -1%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
5726 MIPS -3%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5681 MIPS -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5664 MIPS -4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
5640 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5535 MIPS -6%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5463 MIPS -7%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
5404 MIPS -8%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
5393 MIPS -8%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5380 MIPS -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
5068 MIPS -14%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13648 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=246, last 2 years)
13156 Points +4%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
12710 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=26)
12163 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
10482 Points -18%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
10081 Points -21%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
9856 Points -22%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9294 Points -27%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
9062 Points -29%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8135 Points -36%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7599 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
7353 Points -42%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
6688 Points -47%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5056 Points -60%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1918 Points +5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
1820 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1631 - 1892, n=26)
1797 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=246, last 2 years)
1786 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1777 Points -2%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
1679 Points -8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1632 Points -10%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1569 Points -14%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1538 Points -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1529 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1505 Points -17%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1351 Points -26%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1264 Points -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
1237 Points -32%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=245, last 2 years)
20.5 fps +6%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
19.9 fps +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.4 fps
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8.05 - 22.5, n=25)
17.3 fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
17.1 fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
16 fps -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.8 fps -19%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
15.8 fps -19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
15 fps -23%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.8 fps -24%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
14.3 fps -26%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.6 fps -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
11.1 fps -43%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
11.1 fps -43%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.38 fps -67%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
56.5 s * -27%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
56.1 s * -26%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
51.7 s * -16%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
51.5 s * -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
49.8 s * -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=239, last 2 years)
49.6 s * -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49.3 s * -11%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
49.3 s * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
48.7 s * -10%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
47.7 s * -7%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.4 s * -5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
44.4 s *
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36.8 - 59.8, n=25)
42.7 s * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
40.5 s * +9%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
38.9 s * +12%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE
Intel Core i9-9880H
0.621 sec * -45%
SCHENKER XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.577 sec * -35%
Alienware m17 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.574 sec * -34%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.572 sec * -34%
Acer Aspire 5 A517-52G-79Z5
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.566 sec * -33%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
0.545 sec * -28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.533 sec * -25%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.511 sec * -20%
Gigabyte A7 X1
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.502 sec * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
0.4981 sec * -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4926 sec * -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=242, last 2 years)
0.4753 sec * -11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.506, n=25)
0.4547 sec * -7%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4269 sec *
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4252 sec * -0%
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2567 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
247 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
275 Points
Help
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8540 KRay/s
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39721 Points
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2983 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101357 Points
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9985 Points
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23539 Points
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61517 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1053 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5016 KRay/s
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40529 MPixel/s

System Performance

PCMark scores are some of the highest in our database essentially rivaling the Schenker XMG Ultra 17 equipped with the desktop Core i9-11900K.

PCMark 10 / Score
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
7884 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7883 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7139 - 8083, n=6)
7705 Points -2%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
7511 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
7461 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7212 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6972 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
11266 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
11050 Points +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10854 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10254 - 11178, n=6)
10808 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
10608 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10450 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10226 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9102 - 11186, n=6)
10038 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
9827 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9789 Points
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9564 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9136 Points -7%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
9077 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
8985 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
12511 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
12250 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10900K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
11829 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9847 - 12627, n=6)
11487 Points -8%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB
11245 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10184 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9847 Points -21%
PCMark 10 Score
7883 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62554 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61251 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47304 MB/s -23%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
44180 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65452 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65301 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47698 MB/s -27%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46438 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65518 MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64282 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
47022 MB/s -28%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46176 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.6 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
92.3 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80.3 ns *
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 ns *
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns *
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows minor DPC issues when opening multiple tabs on our homepage. 4K video playback at 60 FPS is smooth but not perfect as we're able to record 14 dropped frames during our minute-long video test.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6767 μs * -948%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4407 μs * -582%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
762 μs * -18%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
646 μs *
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
526 μs * +19%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
395.1 μs * +39%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices — 2x M.2 PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSDs

The 512 GB Samsung PM9A1 drive offers sequential read and writes rates of up to 6900 MB/s and 5000 MB/s, respectively. We're able to reach close to the maximum speeds when running DiskSpd in a loop, but performance would eventually fall off a cliff to "only" 3200 MB/s towards the end of our test as shown by the graph below. The results suggest that the drive is unable to maintain maximum performance for extended periods potentially due to temperature limitations.

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 8
CDM 8
Heat spreader is included for the two SSDs, but they do not appear to be enough to maintain maximum performance indefinitely
Heat spreader is included for the two SSDs, but they do not appear to be enough to maintain maximum performance indefinitely
Up to two PCIe4 x4 SSDs are supported. Our test unit shipped with two drives not in RAID configuration, but users can configure in RAID 0 or 1 if desired
Up to two PCIe4 x4 SSDs are supported. Our test unit shipped with two drives not in RAID configuration, but users can configure in RAID 0 or 1 if desired
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6790 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5012 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 705 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 485.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4425 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4045 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 90.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 226.7 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
91.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
90 pt
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
84.8 pt
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
83.8 pt
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.9 pt
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
52.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4426 (4422.86min - 4426.46max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4251 (4236.46min - 4250.93max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4209 (4177.98min - 4209.4max) MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3980 (3953.55min - 3979.77max) MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3167 (2857.53min - 3167.08max) MB/s -25%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2161 (2137.42min - 2160.91max) MB/s -49%
seq write
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4288 (4263.58min - 4288.05max) MB/s +9%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4283 (4269.53min - 4283.43max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3945 (3883.08min - 3944.74max) MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3840 (3826.15min - 3839.76max) MB/s -3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3834 (3789.52min - 3833.59max) MB/s -3%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2978 (2936.01min - 2977.75max) MB/s -25%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
6684 (5510.27min - 6684.46max) MB/s +62%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6678 (5921.52min - 6678.38max) MB/s +62%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6670 (6036.74min - 6669.78max) MB/s +61%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6653 (6275.76min - 6652.91max) MB/s +61%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6371 (5985.48min - 6371.15max) MB/s +54%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4134 (3437.91min - 4133.91max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5013 (4970.67min - 5012.61max) MB/s +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4999 (4987.66min - 4998.77max) MB/s +3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4949 (4924.12min - 4949.28max) MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4921 (4905.7min - 4920.56max) MB/s +1%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4917 (4616.04min - 4917.19max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4855 (4802.31min - 4855.33max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 read
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
91.7 (91.52min - 91.69max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
90.5 (90.32min - 90.48max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
87.6 (87.01min - 87.6max) MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
59 (58.85min - 58.97max) MB/s -33%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
56.2 (55.28min - 56.2max) MB/s -36%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
51.2 (51.08min - 51.21max) MB/s -42%
4k q1 t1 write
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
232 (230.16min - 231.56max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
227 (226.1min - 227.27max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
227 (226.47min - 227.34max) MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
174 (171.94min - 173.87max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
170 (169.81min - 170.42max) MB/s -25%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
166 (164.47min - 165.73max) MB/s -27%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4180 (4177.07min - 4179.97max) MB/s +22%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4080 (4052.11min - 4079.84max) MB/s +19%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4071 (4064.6min - 4070.6max) MB/s +19%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3423 (3416.77min - 3422.76max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3408 (3395.09min - 3407.81max) MB/s 0%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
724 (719.56min - 724.12max) MB/s -79%
4k q32 t16 write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3545 (3290.66min - 3545.47max) MB/s +22%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3531 (3517.4min - 3531.03max) MB/s +22%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3295 (3221.5min - 3294.97max) MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2975 (2942.71min - 2974.69max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2903 (2888.07min - 2902.85max) MB/s
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
376 (372.82min - 375.8max) MB/s -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8874 Points +6%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8847 Points +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8830 Points +5%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
8404 Points
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7794 Points -7%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4314 Points -49%
Score Read
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3301 Points +9%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3300 Points +9%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3285 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3044 Points +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3019 Points
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1801 Points -40%
Score Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3963 Points +1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3953 Points +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3926 Points 0%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3917 Points
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3252 Points -17%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1737 Points -56%
Seq Read
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5459 MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5408 MB/s -1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5367 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5302 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5223 MB/s -4%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4978 MB/s -9%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3977 MB/s +4%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3965 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3922 MB/s +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3863 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3842 MB/s
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2058 MB/s -46%
4K Read
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
82.2 MB/s +4%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
79.9 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
78.8 MB/s
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
55 MB/s -30%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
52.7 MB/s -33%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
43.4 MB/s -45%
4K Write
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
207.6 MB/s +10%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
194.2 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
188.5 MB/s
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
153.1 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
148.7 MB/s -21%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
146.9 MB/s -22%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2715 MB/s +13%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2692 MB/s +12%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2684 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2439 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2394 MB/s
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1260 MB/s -47%
4K-64 Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3416 MB/s +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3414 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3345 MB/s
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3335 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2652 MB/s -21%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1385 MB/s -59%
Access Time Read
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.046 ms * -12%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.044 ms * -7%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.041 ms *
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
0.039 ms * +5%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.027 ms * +34%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * +46%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.085 ms * -33%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
0.074 ms * -16%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.066 ms * -3%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.064 ms *
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.027 ms * +58%
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.021 ms * +67%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

034068010201360170020402380272030603400374040804420476051005440578061206460Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P: Ø5606 (2290.12-6783.3)

GPU Performance — A Bit Better than the Mobile GeForce RTX 3080

Much like how the desktop GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is about 10 percent faster than the desktop GeForce RTX 3080, the laptop GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is only about 10 percent faster than the laptop GeForce RTX 3080. Expect performance to be most similar to the desktop GeForce RTX 3070 which is a perfect fit for the native QHD 165 Hz display.

Running on MSHybrid mode instead of dGPU mode would result in a 1.2 percent lower Time Spy GPU score (12176 vs. 12020 points) to show that the performance drop when switching to MSHybrid is almost negligible.

When setting the GPU to 175 W via Control Center, our Time Spy graphics score would increase to 12714 points for a performance boost of only 4 to 5 percent.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Port Royal
Port Royal
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
45785 Points +46%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
40910 Points +31%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
31341 Points
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
31096 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6928 - 34439, n=43)
29496 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
28036 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
27228 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
27138 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K
25504 Points -19%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
22391 Points -29%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
14599 Points -53%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
19081 Points +57%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
17467 Points +43%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
13579 Points +12%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
12176 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4921 - 13835, n=43)
11850 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
11099 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K
10938 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10797 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10098 Points -17%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
8479 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
5591 Points -54%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
12074 Points +56%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
10793 Points +39%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
8483 Points +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6613 - 8613, n=17)
7891 Points +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
7741 Points
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
6379 Points -18%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
5166 Points -33%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
12798 Points +66%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
11238 Points +46%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
8191 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6423 - 8462, n=28)
7800 Points +1%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
7721 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K
6633 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
6540 Points -15%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
5092 Points -34%
SCHENKER XMG Focus 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
569 Points -93%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
61244 Points +54%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
47287 Points +19%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
40646 Points +2%
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
39791 Points
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
39651 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13920 - 45841, n=45)
39402 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
37779 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
37405 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17 Comet Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, Intel Core i9-10900K
36838 Points -7%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
29220 Points -27%
3DMark 11 Performance
33697 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
65615 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
26968 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
12364 points
Help

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø112.2 (106-119)
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 186 183 179 125 111
The Witcher 3 (2015) 472.4 368.4 236.3 117.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 186 172 166 159
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 167 155 117
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 160 142 107
Far Cry 5 (2018) 186 160 150 138 120
Strange Brigade (2018) 472 290 231 203 151
Hunt Showdown (2020) 243.2 197.9 167.6 103.6
Doom Eternal (2020) 491.8 321.3 292.4 279 210.6
Gears Tactics (2020) 366.3 270 195.5 136.5 97.1
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 162 141 130 118 98
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 137 128 116 84 64
Dirt 5 (2020) 217.5 167.8 136.8 105.4 85.6
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 166 118 99 85 68
Hitman 3 (2021) 297.5 228.9 211.9 201.8 133.9
F1 2021 (2021) 364 328 271 103 71
Far Cry 6 (2021) 158 131 117 107 88
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) 157 157 157 152 122
Riders Republic (2021) 207 159 133 122 90
Halo Infinite (2021) 260.3 165.7 146.7 137.3 96.3
God of War (2022) 158.5 135.2 110.1 79 64.4

Emissions

System Noise — Unsurprisingly Loud

Like most other gaming laptops, it doesn't take a lot of onscreen activity to get the internal fans spinning. Undemanding actions like web browsing or video streaming would bump fan noise to 30.8 dB(A) against a silent background of 23.1 dB(A). The noise increase is noticeable, but fan RPM adjustments are generally gradual instead of sharp on the GM7AG8P to be more tolerable.

Running higher loads like games would result in noise levels that are very similar to what we observed on the XMG Neo 17 GM7TG8S. Expect fan noise to be in the low-to-mid 50 dB(A) range in such conditions which is a common range for enthusiast gaming laptops. The fans can be so loud that we recommend wearing headphones when playing titles like Fortnite where quieter audio cues are vital to gameplay.

Fan noise profile (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark 06, Orange: Witcher 3, Green: Prime95+FurMark stress)
Fan noise profile (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark 06, Orange: Witcher 3, Green: Prime95+FurMark stress)
Twin 50 to 55 mm fans with five copper heat pipes between them. There is no vapor chamber cooling
Twin 50 to 55 mm fans with five copper heat pipes between them. There is no vapor chamber cooling
The fans are almost active by default when browsing to web or video streaming
The fans are almost active by default when browsing to web or video streaming
Accessible 2x SODIMM DDR5 slots up to 32 GB each
Accessible 2x SODIMM DDR5 slots up to 32 GB each
Liquif metal thermal paste over the CPU. Our unit would exhibit minor electronic noise and so it is never truly silent
Liquif metal thermal paste over the CPU. Our unit would exhibit minor electronic noise and so it is never truly silent

Noise Level

Idle
28.1 / 28.1 / 30.8 dB(A)
Load
39.1 / 52.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.1 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.13629.233.439.42524.326.923.428.232.83131.623.820.522.226.24023.527.819.223.624.55022.82922.223.724.66321.325.825.823.524.28025.124.122.623.92810026.823.819.718.827.112527.423.720.117.628.416030.924.619.913.831.720034.926.82014.834.225037.62824.114.43731539.328.922.315.438.54004030.923.413.239.850040.931.623.312.441.463039.128.82011.638.380038.225.823.28.838.1100041.226.918.59.740.7125041.829.222.89.642.3160042.32917.59.942.4200041.72816.29.941.7250042.828.716.210.443315040.726.116.210.541.1400039.925.614.410.94050003923.913.911.239.3630038.120.314.211.338.2800035.116.613.511.53510000321716.211.631.712500291818.411.527.91600025.715.215.410.524.5SPL52.439.130.823.152.5N8.63.11.40.58.7median 39median 26.1median 18.5median 11.5median 38.3Delta4.93.82.61.84.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise
7%
6%
4%
-2%
6%
off / environment *
23.1
23
-0%
24.9
-8%
24.2
-5%
24
-4%
23.8
-3%
Idle Minimum *
28.1
23
18%
24.9
11%
24.7
12%
24
15%
23.9
15%
Idle Average *
28.1
23
18%
24.9
11%
24.7
12%
25
11%
23.9
15%
Idle Maximum *
30.8
23
25%
29.6
4%
24.7
20%
42
-36%
23.9
22%
Load Average *
39.1
39.5
-1%
31.1
20%
44.3
-13%
46
-18%
38
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52.4
54.5
-4%
49.7
5%
56.3
-7%
48
8%
55.9
-7%
Load Maximum *
52.5
55.09
-5%
54.8
-4%
47.7
9%
48
9%
55.9
-6%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature — Hot Center, Cool Corners

Surface temperatures will always be quite warm toward the center areas of the chassis. When idling on desktop with no other running applications, for example, the keyboard center and the rear of the bottom panel can each be as warm as 40 C. These same areas can warm up to 57 C when running more demanding applications as such as games.

Average surface temperatures are generally cooler than the competing Razer Blade Pro 17 which uses a magnesium alloy chassis instead of ABS plastic. Thus, the palm rests of our GM7AG8P manages to remain cooler and more comfortable than on the Razer when gaming by more than a few degrees C.

Four sets of exhaust vents
Four sets of exhaust vents
AC adapter after an hour of gaming
AC adapter after an hour of gaming
Max. Load
 46.8 °C
116 F
50.2 °C
122 F
38.2 °C
101 F
 
 37.6 °C
100 F
56.8 °C
134 F
28.6 °C
83 F
 
 29.6 °C
85 F
30.2 °C
86 F
28.8 °C
84 F
 
Maximum: 56.8 °C = 134 F
Average: 38.5 °C = 101 F
40 °C
104 F
59.2 °C
139 F
43.2 °C
110 F
30.8 °C
87 F
60.2 °C
140 F
37 °C
99 F
28.4 °C
83 F
33.8 °C
93 F
30.8 °C
87 F
Maximum: 60.2 °C = 140 F
Average: 40.4 °C = 105 F
Power Supply (max.)  43 °C = 109 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 56.8 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.2 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
System idle (top)
System idle (top)
System idle (bottom)
System idle (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Heat
8%
13%
19%
20%
7%
Maximum Upper Side *
56.8
51
10%
58.4
-3%
41
28%
49
14%
54.2
5%
Maximum Bottom *
60.2
62
-3%
49
19%
47.2
22%
57
5%
52.2
13%
Idle Upper Side *
40.2
35
13%
33.6
16%
33.2
17%
28
30%
37.4
7%
Idle Bottom *
43
38
12%
34.6
20%
39
9%
30
30%
41.4
4%

* ... smaller is better

Stress Test

Running Prime95 to stress the CPU would result in a clock rate boost up to the 3.2 to 3.6 GHz range and at a stable core temperature of 80 C. CPU package power would also stabilize at 75 W indefinitely which is the default TDP setting. Users may up the PL1 and PL2 limits up to 120 W each via Control Center if desired.

Running Witcher 3 with the dGPU set to the default 150 W would result in a stable GPU temperature of 76 C and a board power draw of around 150 W according to GPU-Z. If set to 175 W via Control Center, memory clock would increase from 1750 MHz to 1800 MHz while GPU temperature would also increase from 76 C to 86 C. Board power draw would be stable at around 170 W or just shy of the 175 W maximum. Interestingly, GPU clock rates would remain in the 1500 - 1600 MHz range in both 150 W or 175 W TGP modes.

Running on battery power will limit performance by a greater degree than expected. A Time Spy test on dGPU and batteries would return Physics and Graphics scores of just 7150 and 897 points, respectively, compared to 13552 and 12176 points when on mains even with Nvidia Whisper Mode 2.0 and Battery Boost disabled.

System idle
System idle
Witcher 3 stress (150 W TGP mode)
Witcher 3 stress (150 W TGP mode)
Prime95 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
CPU Clock (GHz) GPU Clock (MHz) Average CPU Temperature (°C) Average GPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle -- -- 40 38
Prime95 Stress 3.2 - 3.6 -- 80 58
Prime95 + FurMark Stress 2.5 ~1102 90 85
Witcher 3 Stress (150 W TGP mode) ~1.0 ~1537 73 76

Speakers

Down-firing stereo speakers near front corners
Down-firing stereo speakers near front corners
Pink noise at maximum volume. The speakers are decent in volume but not nearly as loud or as wide in range when compared to the speakers on the MSI GP66
Pink noise at maximum volume. The speakers are decent in volume but not nearly as loud or as wide in range when compared to the speakers on the MSI GP66
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.929.228.9252423.424312320.5234024.219.224.25024.122.224.16322.525.822.5802122.62110020.519.720.512523.320.123.316033.119.933.120043.12043.125049.924.149.931552.522.352.540055.723.455.750059.423.359.463066.22066.280072.123.272.1100068.818.568.8125062.922.862.9160061.917.561.9200063.116.263.1250060.716.260.7315063.616.263.6400068.314.468.3500070.113.970.1630067.914.267.9800060.813.560.81000056.416.256.41250054.718.454.71600062.715.462.7SPL78.230.878.2N41.41.441.4median 60.8median 18.5median 60.8Delta7.12.67.126.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8PApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management

Power Consumption — Demanding Components

Our benchmarks above show a 20 to 30 percent improvement to CPU performance and 10 percent boost to GPU performance over the Core i9-11900H and GeForce RTX 3080, respectively, as found on the Schenker XMG Neo 17 GM7TG8S. Nonetheless, Metrahit measurements show that our GM7AG8P is slightly more power hungry than on the older GM7TG8S when under similar conditions. Running Prime95 in particular consumes about 10 to 15 percent more power on the GM7AG8P meaning that the aforementioned boost to CPU performance doesn't exactly come free. Performance-per-watt with Alder Lake-H is therefore not that much greater when compared to Tiger Lake-H.

We're able to record a temporary maximum draw of 292 W from the large (~18 x 8.5 x 3.5 cm) 280 W AC adapter when running Prime95 and FurMark stress simultaneously. Expect this maximum to be even higher by 20 W or more if manually setting the GPU to 175 W mode. This rate would last about 20 seconds before falling and stabilizing at around 250 W as shown by our screenshot below likely due to thermal limitations.

3DMark 06 power consumption
3DMark 06 power consumption
Witcher 3 at 1080p maximum settings power consumption
Witcher 3 at 1080p maximum settings power consumption
Prime95 stress initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would remain steady with no dips to suggest good Turbo Boost sustainability
Prime95 stress initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would remain steady with no dips to suggest good Turbo Boost sustainability
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to almost 300 W before falling to around 250 W
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike to almost 300 W before falling to around 250 W
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 11.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 29.7 / 33.6 / 35.5 Watt
Load midlight 113.8 / 292 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Power Consumption
18%
9%
11%
29%
28%
Idle Minimum *
29.7
19
36%
10.2
66%
20.9
30%
14
53%
11
63%
Idle Average *
33.6
25
26%
21.2
37%
25.1
25%
19
43%
15.6
54%
Idle Maximum *
35.5
28
21%
48.4
-36%
45
-27%
31
13%
34
4%
Load Average *
113.8
105
8%
118.7
-4%
102
10%
97
15%
81.2
29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
210
223
-6%
249
-19%
189
10%
156
26%
204
3%
Load Maximum *
292
226
23%
262
10%
234.8
20%
231
21%
257.3
12%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270285Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø210 (205-258)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø254 (144-292)

Power Consumption external Monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø142.4 (138-147)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø130.4 (88.7-136)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø194.9 (188-202)
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø206 (202-210)

Battery Life

The integrated battery is relatively large at 91 Wh compared to only 62 W on the XMG Neo 17 with 11th gen Intel. Users can squeeze almost 6 hours of web browsing when on the Balanced profile with MSHybrid active or only 3 hours on discrete GPU mode.

Charging from empty to full with the included AC adapter is much slower than expected at 3 hours. Most Ultrabooks and other gaming laptops can fully recharge in 2 hours or faster. 

Sadly, the system cannot recharge via third-party USB-C adapters unlike on the Razer Blade Pro and most other gaming laptops from Asus or Alienware.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
0h 00min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 32min
SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 91 Wh
SCHENKER XMG NEO 17 GM7TG8S
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 87 Wh
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 91 Wh
Battery Runtime
-19%
-30%
-11%
-8%
8%
Reader / Idle
419
404
592
WiFi v1.3
384
224
-42%
353
-8%
314
-18%
382
-1%
416
8%
Load
92
96
4%
45
-51%
88
-4%
79
-14%
H.264
222

Pros

+ thin-and-light for a GeForce RTX 3080 Ti gaming laptop
+ extensive Control Center performance options
+ fast display response times with no PWM
+ PCIe4 x4 RAID 0/1 support
+ easy serviceability

Cons

- cannot maintain maximum SSD transfer rates for extended periods
- cannot recharge laptop via third-party USB-C adapters
- display could be better calibrated out of the box
- poor webcam quality, no per-key RGB lighting
- large and heavy 280 W AC adapter
- noticeable even backlight bleeding

Verdict — Very High Performance-per-Volume

In review: Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P. Test unit provided by Schenker and Uniwill Technology
In review: Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P. Test unit provided by Schenker and Uniwill Technology

The mobile GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 3080 Ti were introduced to extend the life of the GeForce RTX 3000 series before the inevitable launch of mobile GeForce 4000 series. Until then, however, the mobile RTX 3080 Ti can provide the extra boost in performance that enthusiasts are craving for. Even though the GPU is only marginally faster than the mobile RTX 3080 Ti, it's still impressive to see an ultrathin model like the GM7AG8P outperform a much thicker and heavier alternative like the MSI GE76 10UH with the older RTX 3080.

Perhaps the more noteworthy aspect of the GM7AG8P is its ability to sustain a 150+ W TGP target despite its slim profile and relatively low weight. The Razer Blade Pro and MSI GS76 Stealth, which are both nearly the same size but heavier, ship with only a 95 W to 100 W RTX 3080 TGP target each. Uniwill Technology has managed to fit a more powerful GPU than we initially expected based on our experience with other ultrathin gaming laptops.

The CPU and GPU are some of the fastest for any gaming laptop regardless of size and weight, but the bulky 280 W AC adapter takes away from the otherwise thin and portable design of the laptop.

As for the Core i9-12900H CPU, the performance boost over the Core i9-11900H is more significant than the jump from a mobile RTX 3080 to the mobile RTX 3080 Ti. The gen-to-gen improvement is large enough to comfortably displace the AMD Zen 3 H-series as the top CPU for gaming laptops.

One of the biggest drawbacks to the GM7AG8P is its large 280 W brick that's required to power the demanding processors inside. At nearly a full kilogram, the adapter and associated cables are as heavy as some 15.6-inch Ultrabooks. It's a shame that the system cannot be recharged via USB-C which forces owners to carry the bulky adapter with them when traveling. In contrast, the Asus ROG Zephyrus and Alienware laptops can recharge via travel-friendly third-party USB-C adapters. Expect loud fan noise when gaming as well which is a common trait amongst all gaming laptops in this particular category.

Price and Availability

The Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P is not yet widely available for purchase. Resellers like Schenker and Eluktronics may adopt the chassis at a future date with similar specifications.

SCHENKER Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P - 02/22/2022 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
88%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
67 / 80 → 84%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 92%
Battery
52 / 95 → 55%
Display
85%
Games Performance
100%
Application Performance
98%
Temperature
80 / 95 → 84%
Noise
77 / 90 → 86%
Audio
70%
Camera
43 / 85 → 51%
Average
76%
87%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Intel Core i9-12900H debut: Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P laptop review
Allen Ngo, 2022-02-24 (Update: 2022-03-10)