Notebookcheck Logo

Liquid cooling box runs quieter than expected: Uniwill Technology GM7AG8N laptop review

The coolest gaming laptop. The external water cooler is able to do most of the heavy lifting even when set to its quietest level. It's clunkier for sure, but it's not necessarily any more cumbersome than an external GPU docking station.

After testing the water-cooled 15.6-inch Tongfang GM5AG8W earlier this year from Schenker, we're now ready to test out the water-cooled 17-inch GM7AG8N courtesy of Uniwill Technology/Tongfang. External cooling docks can be considered an extreme solution to the lofty cooling demands of newer mobile CPUs and GPUs. Whereas desktops have the luxury of space, gaming laptops must fit increasingly faster processors into increasingly thinner form factors every year.

Our test unit comes with the 12th gen Core i9-12900H CPU, 175 W GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GPU with MUX, 17-inch 240 Hz 1600p IPS display, and an integrated Cherry MX mechanical keyboard. The model is not yet widely available at the time of publishing.

The Uniwill Technology GM7AG8N competes directly with more traditional 17-inch gaming laptops like the Razer Blade 17, Asus ROG Zephyrus S17, MSI Stealth GS77, or the Gigabyte Aorus 17X. However, the Uniwill is a 16:10 form factor whereas most other 17-inch alternatives are still 16:9. The cooling box is the same as on the Schenker GM5AG8W and so we recommend checking out our existing reviews here and here for more details on how to setup the external cooler.

More Uniwill Technology reviews:

Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 140 W PL2 / Short Burst, 98 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1590 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 175 W TDP, GDDR6, 512.89, MUX and Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, Samsung DDR5-4800, 40-39-39-76, Single-channel
Display
17.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 178 PPI, BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, BOE0A99, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27.6 x 381.7 x 272.8 ( = 1.09 x 15.03 x 10.74 in)
Battery
99 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 1080p30
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo 2W x2, Keyboard: Cherry MX mechanical, Keyboard Light: yes, Liquid cooling box, Control Center, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.749 kg ( = 96.97 oz / 6.06 pounds), Power Supply: 1.057 kg ( = 37.28 oz / 2.33 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.1 %
10/2022
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.7 kg27.6 mm17.00"2560x1600
88.3 %
08/2022
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3.3 kg23 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.7 %
08/2022
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.7 kg30 mm17.30"1920x1080
89.9 %
07/2022
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
87.2 %
04/2022
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.9 kg20.8 mm17.30"2560x1440
90.1 %
07/2021
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"2560x1440

Case — A Huge Fingerprint Magnet

The 17-inch Uniwill Technology GM7AG8N shares similar features to the 15.6-inch GM5AG8W since both support the same external water cooling box. Nonetheless, the two models are very different when it comes to the keyboard deck and bottom plate design. Whereas the GM5AG8W integrates a beveled keyboard with lots of ventilation grilles on the bottom, the GM7AG8N has a chiclet keyboard with redesigned vents. The LED styling is also different between them as the GM7AG8N has an LED bar along the rear while the GM5AG8W has one along the front.

Chassis rigidity is excellent for the base and keyboard deck. Attempting to twist the base or apply pressure on the keyboard center would result in just minimal flexing and no creaking. The hinges and lid are also strong, but they're slightly more flexible than on the Razer Blade 17 series.

The Uniwill is thicker and longer than most other 17-inch gaming laptops while weighing about the same. Its slightly squarer footprint can be attributed to its 16:10 aspect ratio which is uncommon for a gaming laptop of this screen size. Overall weight is thankfully average for the category before accounting for the external cooling box.

  • Laptop weight: 2749 g
  • AC adapter weight: 1057 g
  • External cooling box with water tubes (no water): 1160 g
The matte deck is slightly rubberized meaning it will readily attract fingerprints for an unsightly glossy look over time
The matte deck is slightly rubberized meaning it will readily attract fingerprints for an unsightly glossy look over time
Matte gray color from top to bottom. The rear LED bar can be seen here as well
Matte gray color from top to bottom. The rear LED bar can be seen here as well
Lid opens to a maximum of ~140 degrees
Lid opens to a maximum of ~140 degrees
No fingerprint-enabled power button
No fingerprint-enabled power button
Rear connectors for the water tubes
Rear connectors for the water tubes
The bottom is noticeably thicker along the rear than it is along the front
The bottom is noticeably thicker along the rear than it is along the front

Size Comparison

398 mm / 15.7 inch 258 mm / 10.2 inch 30 mm / 1.181 inch 2.7 kg6.04 lbs397 mm / 15.6 inch 330 mm / 13 inch 23 mm / 0.906 inch 3.3 kg7.28 lbs397.6 mm / 15.7 inch 283.5 mm / 11.2 inch 20.8 mm / 0.819 inch 2.9 kg6.4 lbs395 mm / 15.6 inch 260 mm / 10.2 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.8 kg6.12 lbs394 mm / 15.5 inch 264 mm / 10.4 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.8 kg6.1 lbs381.7 mm / 15 inch 272.8 mm / 10.7 inch 27.6 mm / 1.087 inch 2.7 kg6.06 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity — Thunderbolt 4 Support

Port options and positioning are identical to the 15.6-inch Schenker XMG Neo 15 E22 even though our Uniwill is a larger 17-inch form factor. We would like to see additional USB-C ports in the future as the single port feels limiting.

Front: No ports
Front: No ports
Right: SD card reader, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen. 1
Right: SD card reader, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen. 1
Rear: Water cooler attachment, USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 + DisplayPort 1.4, RJ-45 2.5 Gbps, AC adapter
Rear: Water cooler attachment, USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 + DisplayPort 1.4, RJ-45 2.5 Gbps, AC adapter
Left: Kensington lock, USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm microsphone, 3.5 mm headphones
Left: Kensington lock, USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm microsphone, 3.5 mm headphones

SD Card Reader

Transfer rates with the integrated card reader is only half that of the Asus Zephyrus S17 or Razer Blade 17. This shouldn't be an issue for most users aside from those who rely heavily on transferring large files via SD cards.

Fully inserted SD card protrudes by over half its length to be unsafe for transporting
Fully inserted SD card protrudes by over half its length to be unsafe for transporting
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
183 (181.31min - 182.94max) MB/s ∼100% +127%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
152 MB/s ∼83% +89%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
80.6 MB/s ∼44%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)
72.1 MB/s ∼39% -11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
69.1 (68.5min - 72.99max) MB/s ∼38% -14%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
257 MB/s ∼100% +187%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
89.7 MB/s ∼35%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
88.14 MB/s ∼34% -2%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro V60)
80.2 MB/s ∼31% -11%

Communication

It's a bit disappointing to not see Wi-Fi 6E included considering the high price of the laptop. Nonetheless, Wi-Fi 6 is still more than enough for most users since Wi-Fi 6E is rarely any better in most real-world scenarios.

Removable M.2 WLAN module
Removable M.2 WLAN module
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
986 (735min - 1134max) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
636 (325min - 728max) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1270 (1179min - 1317max) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
698 (529min - 748max) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1755 (1679min - 1765max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1680 (1438min - 1732max) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1691 (1589min - 1731max) MBit/s ∼100% +51%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1672 (864min - 1737max) MBit/s ∼99% +49%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1121 (929min - 1253max) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1648 (1133min - 1711max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1488 (1300min - 1531max) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1610 (1421min - 1675max) MBit/s ∼100% +54%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1043 (801min - 1121max) MBit/s ∼65%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250Tooltip
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1043 (801-1121)
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1120 (929-1253)

Webcam

The 2 MP camera has poor colors even by the already low webcam standards. IR is supported, but there is no privacy shutter.

ColorChecker
17.6 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
22 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box: 15.1 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 32.5 ∆E

Maintenance

The bottom panel pops off easily after removing several Philips screws for straightforward RAM or SSD upgrades. The motherboard has many similarities to the GM5AG8W but with slight changes to the cooling solution as shown by the comparison images below.

Uniwill GM7AG8N
Uniwill GM7AG8N
Schenker XMG Neo GM5AG8W for comparison
Schenker XMG Neo GM5AG8W for comparison

Accessories and Warranty

The external cooling box includes two drain plugs, two water tubes, two water stoppers, and a user's manual in addition to the usual AC adapter.

The standard one-year limited warranty applies if purchased in the US.

Input Devices — Loud And Clicky

Keyboard

The per-key RGB keyboard is different than on the XMG Neo 15 E22 even though the two laptops share the same ports. The Cherry MX keys on our Uniwill offer noticeably deeper travel, crisper feedback, and a much louder clatter than on most other laptops. You'll want to avoid using this laptop in classrooms, conferences, or libraries because of the loud clatter.

An annoying aspect we noticed is that the numpad keys are softer and quieter than the main QWERTY keys and so feedback is not uniform across all keys. It feels awkward typing between words and numbers because feedback is so different between the keys.

Touchpad

The oversized clickpad is even larger than the already large clickpad on the MSI GS77 (15.5 x 10 cm vs. 13.2 x 8.2 cm). Its surface is slightly rubberized for a very smooth glide at medium-to-high speeds with only a bit of sticking at slower speeds.

Feedback when clicking on the clickpad is firmer than on the large XPS 17 clickpad for a more satisfying feel. It's definitely louder, however, but we don't expect this to be a huge issue since the mechanical keys are already quite loud anyway. 

Mechanical keyboard is very loud and very clicky
Mechanical keyboard is very loud and very clicky
Clickpad attracts fingerprints because of its slightly rubberized surface
Clickpad attracts fingerprints because of its slightly rubberized surface
Key feedback is firmer and louder than on most other laptops
Key feedback is firmer and louder than on most other laptops
Numpad keys are softer and not as loud as the main QWERTY keys
Numpad keys are softer and not as loud as the main QWERTY keys

Display — Optimized For 1440p Gaming

The BOE NE170QDM-NZ1 panel on our Uniwill test unit is the first to appear in our database. This G-Sync-compatible IPS panel offers full sRGB coverage, fast response times, good contrast, a fast 240 Hz refresh rate, and a relatively bright 400-nit backlight to be worthy fit for an enthusiast gaming machine. However, most other gaming laptops like the Razer Blade 17 have additional panel options like 4K or OLED both of which are unavailable on the Uniwill .

No edge-to-edge glass or glossy options
No edge-to-edge glass or glossy options
Narrow side bezels
Narrow side bezels
RGB subpixel array is just slightly grainy
RGB subpixel array is just slightly grainy
Minor uneven backlight bleeding on our unit
Minor uneven backlight bleeding on our unit
386.9
cd/m²
377.5
cd/m²
388.1
cd/m²
395.4
cd/m²
392.5
cd/m²
377.6
cd/m²
401.6
cd/m²
392.8
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NE170QDM-NZ1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 414 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 391.8 cd/m² Minimum: 19.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 392.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 872:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.46 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 0.38
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
69.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Sharp SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30
Aorus 17X XES
Sharp SHP1563, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
BOE099D (BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display
2%
1%
23%
21%
19%
Display P3 Coverage
69.1
70.8
2%
70.1
1%
99.4
44%
96.2
39%
94.2
36%
sRGB Coverage
99.7
98.9
-1%
99.9
0%
100
0%
99.7
0%
98.7
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.8
73
5%
71.9
3%
87.3
25%
85.8
23%
84.4
21%
Response Times
63%
59%
44%
-31%
43%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.8 ?(6, 6.8)
3.03 ?(1.28, 1.75)
76%
3.4 ?(1.4, 2)
73%
7.5 ?(2.1, 5.4)
41%
17.6 ?(10, 7.6)
-38%
4.8
62%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
5.28 ?(2.32, 2.96)
49%
5.8 ?(2.5, 3.3)
44%
5.6 ?(1.6, 4)
46%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-23%
8
23%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-55%
-74%
11%
-47%
-62%
Brightness middle
392.5
280
-29%
278
-29%
503
28%
334.8
-15%
322
-18%
Brightness
392
275
-30%
273
-30%
486
24%
305
-22%
288
-27%
Brightness Distribution
91
79
-13%
79
-13%
84
-8%
79
-13%
72
-21%
Black Level *
0.45
0.4
11%
0.26
42%
0.44
2%
0.34
24%
0.3
33%
Contrast
872
700
-20%
1069
23%
1143
31%
985
13%
1073
23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.46
2.1
-44%
3.96
-171%
1.08
26%
4.1
-181%
3.05
-109%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.62
5.83
-26%
10.78
-133%
4.54
2%
7.28
-58%
5.23
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.38
1.58
-316%
1.07
-182%
0.6
-58%
1.92
-405%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.5
3.3
-32%
6.8
-172%
1.3
48%
5.6
-124%
3.11
-24%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.13 103%
2.224 99%
2.151 102%
2.16 102%
2.13 103%
CCT
6614 98%
7060 92%
7651 85%
6541 99%
6314 103%
6553 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
84
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / -26%
-5% / -39%
26% / 18%
-19% / -29%
0% / -30%

* ... smaller is better

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3

The display is already well-calibrated out of the box as shown by our CalMAN results below. Attempting to calibrate it even further with our X-Rite colorimeter would improve average grayscale and color DeltaE values just marginally to 0.4 and 0.38, respectively.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 6.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19466 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is decent if under shade. The 400-nit backlight is brighter than on most other gaming laptops like the Aorus 17X or Asus Zephyrus S17 where 300 nits is common.

Outdoors under overcast
Outdoors under overcast
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under overcast
Outdoors under overcast
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast degrade if viewing from extreme angles
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast degrade if viewing from extreme angles

Performance — Unthrottled

 

Testing Conditions

Unless stated otherwise, all tests and benchmarks below were performed with the external cooling box connected and active. We also made sure to set Windows to Performance, disable Optimus in favor of MUX, and set the Control Center software to "Fan Boost".

The cooling box has three noise level settings: Quieter, Quiet, and Balanced. The naming isn't fooling anyone, however, as these three settings can be translated to Low, Medium, and Loudest. We set our cooling box unit to "Balanced" for the purposes of testing. Keep in mind that the cooling box will not run on battery power.

It's highly recommended that owners become familiar with the preinstalled Control Center software as it is the control hub for the laptop. Everything from performance to lighting, fan controls, and overclocking is controlled here as shown by some screenshots below. Our overclock settings are the default settings of the laptop as shipped.

Processor

CPU performance is better than expected with results that are 15 to 25 percent faster than the average laptop in our database with the same Core i9-12900H. In fact, this Uniwill model is the fastest Core i9-12900H laptop we've tested thus far.

Performance sustainability is also excellent as one would expect from any decent gaming laptop especially from one that is water-cooled.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420Tooltip
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2974 (2936.64-3010.46)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3311 (3259.45-3569.52)
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø1562 (1542.73-1850.99)
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2569 (2512.4-2719.42)
Schenker Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2545 (2524.61-2567.06)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
88.2 pt ∼88%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
78.8 pt ∼79%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
76.1 pt ∼76%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
71.8 pt ∼72%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64.7 pt ∼65%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
63.7 pt ∼64%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
62.5 pt ∼63%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
60.7 pt ∼61%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
59.6 pt ∼60%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
49.6 pt ∼50%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
48.5 pt ∼49%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
8667 Points ∼100% +16%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
7471 Points ∼86%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
7169 Points ∼83% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2922 - 7471, n=19)
5909 Points ∼68% -21%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5549 Points ∼64% -26%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
5383 Points ∼62% -28%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5277 Points ∼61% -29%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
4878 Points ∼56% -35%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
4808 Points ∼55% -36%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
4020 Points ∼46% -46%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
3531 Points ∼41% -53%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
738 Points ∼100% +2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
727 Points ∼99% +1%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
721 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (653 - 738, n=19)
713 Points ∼97% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
689 Points ∼93% -4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
610 Points ∼83% -15%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
605 Points ∼82% -16%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points ∼79% -19%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
572 Points ∼78% -21%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
490 Points ∼66% -32%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
474 Points ∼64% -34%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
22982 Points ∼100% +17%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
19648 (19320.7min - 19648.3max) Points ∼85%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18870 (18654.1min - 18869.7max) Points ∼82% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7647 - 19648, n=19)
15749 Points ∼69% -20%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14152 Points ∼62% -28%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
14011 (13899.7min - 14010.8max) Points ∼61% -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
13934 Points ∼61% -29%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13618 (13498.1min - 13618.3max) Points ∼59% -31%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
13012 Points ∼57% -34%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
10450 (9829.16min - 10450.5max) Points ∼45% -47%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
9071 (8918.34min - 9070.5max) Points ∼39% -54%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1913 Points ∼100% +12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1905 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1698 - 1921, n=19)
1841 Points ∼96% +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1790 Points ∼94% +5%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
1701 Points ∼89%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1575 Points ∼82% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1557 Points ∼81% -8%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
1508 Points ∼79% -11%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1497 Points ∼78% -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
1270 Points ∼66% -25%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
1217 Points ∼64% -28%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
3570 (3259.45min - 3569.52max) Points ∼100% +19%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
3010 (2936.64min - 3010.46max) Points ∼84%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2918 (2849.61min - 2917.79max) Points ∼82% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
2820 (1902.5min - 2820.28max) Points ∼79% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1561 - 3077, n=19)
2562 Points ∼72% -15%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2296 Points ∼64% -24%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2223 (2202.89min - 2222.96max) Points ∼62% -26%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
2165 (2089.97min - 2164.85max) Points ∼61% -28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
2148 (1832.59min - 2147.65max) Points ∼60% -29%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
1715 (1653.3min - 1715.27max) Points ∼48% -43%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
1489 (1469.35min - 1489.04max) Points ∼42% -51%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
278 Points ∼100% +3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
272 Points ∼98% 0%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
271 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (243 - 277, n=20)
265 Points ∼95% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points ∼92% -5%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
248 Points ∼89% -8%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Points ∼86% -11%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
238 Points ∼86% -12%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
225 Points ∼81% -17%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
203 Points ∼73% -25%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
196 Points ∼71% -28%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
302 Seconds * ∼100% -89%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
272 Seconds * ∼90% -70%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
249 Seconds * ∼82% -56%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
247 Seconds * ∼82% -54%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
230 Seconds * ∼76% -44%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
219 Seconds * ∼73% -37%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (160 - 415, n=19)
218 Seconds * ∼72% -36%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
216 Seconds * ∼72% -35%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
173.6 Seconds * ∼57% -9%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
160 Seconds * ∼53%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
147 Seconds * ∼49% +8%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
86234 MIPS ∼100% +31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
69146 MIPS ∼80% +5%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
65896 MIPS ∼76%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64439 MIPS ∼75% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (37614 - 73489, n=19)
62806 MIPS ∼73% -5%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
62023 MIPS ∼72% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
55010 MIPS ∼64% -17%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
54133 MIPS ∼63% -18%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
53205 MIPS ∼62% -19%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
46135 MIPS ∼53% -30%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
45258 MIPS ∼52% -31%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6256 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
5979 MIPS ∼96%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5872 MIPS ∼94% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5302 - 6120, n=19)
5857 MIPS ∼94% -2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5803 MIPS ∼93% -3%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5747 MIPS ∼92% -4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
5640 MIPS ∼90% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
5588 MIPS ∼89% -7%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
5367 MIPS ∼86% -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
5338 MIPS ∼85% -11%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
5208 MIPS ∼83% -13%
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
16250 Points ∼100% +42%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13717 Points ∼84% +20%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
12661 Points ∼78% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=19)
12384 Points ∼76% +9%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
11410 Points ∼70%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10126 Points ∼62% -11%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
9856 Points ∼61% -14%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8732 Points ∼54% -23%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
8134 Points ∼50% -29%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
7756 Points ∼48% -32%
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1923 Points ∼100% +11%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1878 Points ∼98% +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1647 - 1892, n=19)
1824 Points ∼95% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1756 Points ∼91% +1%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
1731 Points ∼90%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1632 Points ∼85% -6%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1590 Points ∼83% -8%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1539 Points ∼80% -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
1315 Points ∼68% -24%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
1266 Points ∼66% -27%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
25.6 fps ∼100% +21%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
21.4 fps ∼84% +1%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
21.2 fps ∼83%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (9.16 - 22.5, n=19)
17.8 fps ∼70% -16%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
17.5 fps ∼68% -17%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
17.2 fps ∼67% -19%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
16.9 fps ∼66% -20%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
15 fps ∼59% -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.1 fps ∼55% -33%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
13.5 fps ∼53% -36%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.1 fps ∼47% -43%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
86.1 s * ∼100% -79%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
56 s * ∼65% -17%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
49.3 s * ∼57% -3%
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
48.8 s * ∼57% -2%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
48 s * ∼56%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.5 s * ∼54% +3%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
45.9 s * ∼53% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
45.3 s * ∼53% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (38 - 59.8, n=19)
43 s * ∼50% +10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
40.7 s * ∼47% +15%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
39 s * ∼45% +19%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
MSI GE76 Raider 10UH
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.589 sec * ∼100% -23%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch)
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.587 sec * ∼100% -22%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.565 sec * ∼96% -18%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.533 sec * ∼90% -11%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G733QSA-XS99
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4964 sec * ∼84% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4808 sec * ∼82% -0%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4795 sec * ∼81%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4614 sec * ∼78% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.5, n=19)
0.447 sec * ∼76% +7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4323 sec * ∼73% +10%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4194 sec * ∼71% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3010 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
219 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
271 Points
Help
Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 pt ∼99%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
79.7 pt ∼80%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
78.3 pt ∼78%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
63 pt ∼63%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62 pt ∼62%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
43.7 pt ∼44%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD -9!
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 pt ∼0%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21797 KRay/s ∼100% +19%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
18289 KRay/s ∼84%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15255 KRay/s ∼70% -17%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (4074 - 18289, n=19)
10420 KRay/s ∼48% -43%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8778 KRay/s ∼40% -52%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5706 KRay/s ∼26% -69%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107354 Points ∼100% +15%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93236 Points ∼87%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
78356 Points ∼73% -16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (22307 - 93236, n=19)
50920 Points ∼47% -45%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39321 Points ∼37% -58%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
28086 Points ∼26% -70%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4945 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4215 MB/s ∼85%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3559 MB/s ∼72% -16%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3102 MB/s ∼63% -26%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1378 - 4215, n=19)
3070 MB/s ∼62% -27%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1933 MB/s ∼39% -54%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110119 Points ∼100%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104457 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103770 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (78668 - 111168, n=19)
102970 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
97836 Points ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
83594 Points ∼76% -24%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12969 Points ∼100% +25%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
10475 Points ∼81% +1%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10407 Points ∼80%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9822 Points ∼76% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5709 - 10407, n=19)
9290 Points ∼72% -11%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7257 Points ∼56% -30%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
52544 Points ∼100% +15%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
45581 Points ∼87%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39016 Points ∼74% -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (11257 - 45581, n=19)
27124 Points ∼52% -40%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23749 Points ∼45% -48%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
15575 Points ∼30% -66%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
179186 MB/s ∼100% +110%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
134645 MB/s ∼75% +58%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95822 MB/s ∼53% +12%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85405 MB/s ∼48%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (31935 - 140758, n=19)
84302 MB/s ∼47% -1%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41612 MB/s ∼23% -51%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1389 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1174 MB/s ∼85%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1068 MB/s ∼77% -9%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
990 MB/s ∼71% -16%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (449 - 1193, n=19)
962 MB/s ∼69% -18%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
585 MB/s ∼42% -50%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s ∼0% -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
11612 KRay/s ∼100% +10%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10511 KRay/s ∼91%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8518 KRay/s ∼73% -19%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2235 - 10511, n=19)
5844 KRay/s ∼50% -44%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5041 KRay/s ∼43% -52%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3181 KRay/s ∼27% -70%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41007 MPixel/s ∼100% +96%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40386 MPixel/s ∼98% +93%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39529 MPixel/s ∼96% +89%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
37573 MPixel/s ∼92% +79%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (20960 - 48269, n=19)
36656 MPixel/s ∼89% +75%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
20960 MPixel/s ∼51%

System Performance

PCMark 10 results are comparable to other laptops with the same CPU and GPU like the Alienware x15 R2 P111F or Razer Blade 17 Early 2022.

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8203 Points ∼100% +5%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7899 Points ∼96% +1%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7818 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7139 - 8083, n=6)
7705 Points ∼94% -1%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7435 Points ∼91% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7245 Points ∼88% -7%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7139 Points ∼87% -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11093 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10254 - 11178, n=6)
10808 Points ∼97% +1%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10729 Points ∼97%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10630 Points ∼96% -1%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10589 Points ∼95% -1%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10369 Points ∼93% -3%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10254 Points ∼92% -4%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10237 Points ∼100% +7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10178 Points ∼99% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9102 - 11186, n=6)
10038 Points ∼98% +5%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9570 Points ∼93%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9527 Points ∼93% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9182 Points ∼90% -4%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9102 Points ∼89% -5%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13270 Points ∼100% +5%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
12627 Points ∼95%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
12342 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9847 - 12627, n=6)
11487 Points ∼87% -9%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11291 Points ∼85% -11%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10578 Points ∼80% -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10573 Points ∼80% -16%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2155 Points ∼100% +27%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2108 Points ∼98% +24%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1696 - 1965, n=3)
1818 Points ∼84% +7%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1792 Points ∼83% +6%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1696 Points ∼79%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2030 Points ∼100% +25%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1978 Points ∼97% +22%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1622 - 1870, n=3)
1746 Points ∼86% +8%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1745 Points ∼86% +8%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1622 Points ∼80%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2304 Points ∼100% +24%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2288 Points ∼99% +23%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1855 - 2135, n=3)
1961 Points ∼85% +6%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1893 Points ∼82% +2%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1855 Points ∼81%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2113 Points ∼100% +42%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1991 Points ∼94% +34%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1643 Points ∼78% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1483 - 1777, n=3)
1634 Points ∼77% +10%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1483 Points ∼70%
PCMark 10 Score
7818 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64030 MB/s ∼100% +86%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
62852 MB/s ∼98% +83%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62024 MB/s ∼97% +80%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60030 MB/s ∼94% +74%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34438 - 74264, n=19)
58557 MB/s ∼91% +70%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
34438 MB/s ∼54%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
68051 MB/s ∼100% +87%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65077 MB/s ∼96% +79%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62684 MB/s ∼92% +72%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62140 MB/s ∼91% +71%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36365 - 74642, n=19)
60786 MB/s ∼89% +67%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36365 MB/s ∼53%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65506 MB/s ∼100% +103%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60014 MB/s ∼92% +86%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
60001 MB/s ∼92% +86%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
58004 MB/s ∼89% +80%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (32276 - 65518, n=19)
57631 MB/s ∼88% +79%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
32276 MB/s ∼49%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93.6 ns * ∼100% -2%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91.9 ns * ∼98%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
88.8 ns * ∼95% +3%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87 ns * ∼93% +5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (91.2 - 118.1, n=18)
83.8 ns * ∼90% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latency

LatencyMon reveals DPC issues when opening multiple browser tabs of our homepage. 4K60 video playback is otherwise perfect with no dropped frames.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2256 μs * ∼100% -61%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1445 μs * ∼64% -3%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1397.6 μs * ∼62%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1115 μs * ∼49% +20%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
388.5 μs * ∼17% +72%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices — 2x M.2 2280 PCIe4 x4 Support

Our test unit comes equipped with the same Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR PCIe4 x4 SSD as found many other high-end gaming laptops like the MSI Titan GT77. However, the drive exhibits performance issues when stressed despite the fact that a heat spreader is included. When running DiskSpd in a loop, read rates would start out very high at ~6500 MB/s before quickly falling to ~1400 MB/s as shown by our graph below. This could be a potential bug with the system.

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS SSD
AS SSD
Up to two internal M.2 2280 PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSDs are supported
Up to two internal M.2 2280 PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSDs are supported
A heat spreader for the two SSDs is attached to the underside of the bottom cover
A heat spreader for the two SSDs is attached to the underside of the bottom cover
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6947 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5058 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 452 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 341.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2936 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2045 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 72.42 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 139.7 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
91.1 pt ∼91%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
88.7 pt ∼89%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
84.4 pt ∼84%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83.4 pt ∼83%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
77.2 pt ∼77%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
62.3 pt ∼62%
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4645 (4634.08min - 4645.19max) MB/s ∼100% +24%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4265 (4201.21min - 4264.91max) MB/s ∼92% +13%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3871 (2700.14min - 3870.94max) MB/s ∼83% +3%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3759 (3739.71min - 3758.94max) MB/s ∼81%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3561 (3468.06min - 3560.96max) MB/s ∼77% -5%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3431 (3308.35min - 3431.42max) MB/s ∼74% -9%
seq write
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4670 (4358.09min - 4669.83max) MB/s ∼100% +56%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4574 (4560.15min - 4574.31max) MB/s ∼98% +52%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4224 (3372.85min - 4224.08max) MB/s ∼90% +41%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4173 (4063.65min - 4172.96max) MB/s ∼89% +39%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3966 (3885.39min - 3966.13max) MB/s ∼85% +32%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3001 (2978.08min - 3000.89max) MB/s ∼64%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7089 (6335.16min - 7089.42max) MB/s ∼100% +9%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6921 (6272.83min - 6920.6max) MB/s ∼98% +7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6722 (987.46min - 6721.79max) MB/s ∼95% +4%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6661 (6277.2min - 6660.66max) MB/s ∼94% +3%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6634 (6182.19min - 6633.5max) MB/s ∼94% +2%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6486 (5824.1min - 6485.86max) MB/s ∼91%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5251 (5213.16min - 5250.64max) MB/s ∼100% +7%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5037 (5025min - 5036.73max) MB/s ∼96% +3%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4963 (4631.73min - 4962.63max) MB/s ∼95% +1%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4939 (4932.28min - 4939.42max) MB/s ∼94% +1%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4907 (4898.38min - 4907max) MB/s ∼93%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4852 (4198.71min - 4852.39max) MB/s ∼92% -1%
4k q1 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
91.2 (91.05min - 91.17max) MB/s ∼100% +28%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
83 (80.56min - 82.99max) MB/s ∼91% +17%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
77 (74.91min - 76.95max) MB/s ∼84% +8%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
74.1 (64.69min - 74.09max) MB/s ∼81% +4%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71 (70.18min - 70.97max) MB/s ∼78%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
69.8 (66.49min - 69.8max) MB/s ∼77% -2%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
319 (315.54min - 318.7max) MB/s ∼100% +119%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
273 (252.96min - 272.53max) MB/s ∼86% +88%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
255 (254.32min - 255.35max) MB/s ∼80% +75%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
241 MB/s ∼76% +66%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
222 (221.38min - 221.87max) MB/s ∼70% +53%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
145.5 (144.22min - 145.49max) MB/s ∼46%
4k q32 t16 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4060 (4051.28min - 4059.64max) MB/s ∼100% +341%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3934 (3812.88min - 3933.78max) MB/s ∼97% +328%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3797 (3780.09min - 3796.62max) MB/s ∼94% +313%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3564 (3554.96min - 3563.6max) MB/s ∼88% +287%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2831 (2643.61min - 2831.48max) MB/s ∼70% +208%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
920 (870.88min - 920.35max) MB/s ∼23%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3570 (3534.41min - 3570.18max) MB/s ∼100% +900%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3504 (3465.89min - 3503.69max) MB/s ∼98% +882%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3437 (3425.9min - 3437.33max) MB/s ∼96% +863%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3129 (3011.94min - 3128.85max) MB/s ∼88% +776%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2665 (2242.61min - 2664.85max) MB/s ∼75% +646%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
357 (330.06min - 357.36max) MB/s ∼10%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9242 Points ∼100% +62%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8492 Points ∼92% +49%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8380 Points ∼91% +47%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7807 Points ∼84% +37%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7400 Points ∼80% +30%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5689 Points ∼62%
Score Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3629 Points ∼100% +143%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3327 Points ∼92% +123%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3161 Points ∼87% +112%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2951 Points ∼81% +98%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2764 Points ∼76% +85%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1493 Points ∼41%
Score Write
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3877 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3631 Points ∼94% +3%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3531 Points ∼91% +1%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3513 Points ∼91%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3397 Points ∼88% -3%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3254 Points ∼84% -7%
Seq Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5715 MB/s ∼100% +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5085 MB/s ∼89% +11%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5061.06 MB/s ∼89% +11%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4923.15 MB/s ∼86% +8%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4682 MB/s ∼82% +3%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4560.87 MB/s ∼80%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4434 MB/s ∼100% +70%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4019 MB/s ∼91% +54%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3797.23 MB/s ∼86% +46%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3764.99 MB/s ∼85% +45%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3218 MB/s ∼73% +24%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2603.3 MB/s ∼59%
4K Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
94.04 MB/s ∼100% +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
80.3 MB/s ∼85% +16%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
77.59 MB/s ∼83% +12%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
69.89 MB/s ∼74% +1%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
69.28 MB/s ∼74%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
66.2 MB/s ∼70% -4%
4K Write
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
256.3 MB/s ∼100% +51%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
217.9 MB/s ∼85% +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
214.7 MB/s ∼84% +27%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
211.73 MB/s ∼83% +25%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
194.44 MB/s ∼76% +15%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
169.2 MB/s ∼66%
4K-64 Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2963 MB/s ∼100% +206%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2751.05 MB/s ∼93% +184%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2573 MB/s ∼87% +166%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2381.4 MB/s ∼80% +146%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2229 MB/s ∼75% +130%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
967.22 MB/s ∼33%
4K-64 Write
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3299 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3083.76 MB/s ∼93%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2972 MB/s ∼90% -4%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2942.87 MB/s ∼89% -5%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2822.91 MB/s ∼86% -8%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2635 MB/s ∼80% -15%
Access Time Read
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.085 ms * ∼100%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.049 ms * ∼58%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.042 ms * ∼49%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.032 ms * ∼38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.018 ms * ∼21%
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0 ms * ∼0%
Access Time Write
Uniwell Technology GM7AG8N Liquid Cooling Box
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.069 ms * ∼100%
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.06 ms * ∼87% +13%
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * ∼30% +70%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.02 ms * ∼29% +71%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.02 ms * ∼29% +71%
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.014 ms * ∼20% +80%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03256509751300162519502275260029253250357539004225455048755200552558506175Tooltip

GPU Performance — Full Fat 175 W TGP GPU

Graphics performance is about 5 to 15 percent faster than the average laptop in our database equipped with the same GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GPU. The GPU is able to run even faster if users decide to overclock it further beyond the manufacturer settings.

Interestingly, graphics performance is not reduced if running the cooling box at its lowest fan level setting. Running Fire Strike at the "Quietest" mode would result in Physics and Graphics scores 31443 and 31311 points, respectively, compared to 30601 and 30959 points when on the "Balanced" cooling box mode. This is especially important as it means you don't have to run the system at its maximum fan settings if you don't intend to overclock the GPU.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Time Spy
Time Spy