Notebookcheck Logo

Schenker XMG Pro 15 (RTX 3080 Ti) laptop review: The Mike Tyson of all-round laptops

Lots of talent - with ifs and buts. Schenker advertises the new XMG Pro 15 with a powerful RTX 3080 Ti as an all-round talent for gamers and workstation users. Powerful hardware meets a new Clevo case, which is intended to improve on the weaknesses of the predecessor. Whether this succeeds is revealed in our detailed review below.

At the beginning of the year, we reviewed the predecessor with the Tiger Lake CPU and RTX 3080. Now Schenker has created a new case and updated the hardware to Alder Lake and RTX 3080 Ti. This time, we are reviewing the variant with a QHD IPS display instead of a 4K OLED screen.

In addition to the predecessor, other 15-inch laptops with similar hardware are used for comparison, including the MSI Raider GE66 12UHS as well as the Razer Blade 15. We also compare the performance with that of the in-house XMG Neo 15 with and without its XMG Oasis liquid cooling system.

XMG Pro 15
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, 155 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 516.59, MUX-Schalter und Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB DDR4-3200
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, BOE09C2 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1), IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, 1024 GB 
, 960 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 2-in-1 audio port plus headset port, Card Reader: microSD reader, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 358 x 240 ( = 0.98 x 14.09 x 9.45 in)
Battery
80 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: Full-HD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet with RGB per key, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.39 kg ( = 84.3 oz / 5.27 pounds), Power Supply: 700 g ( = 24.69 oz / 1.54 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.9 %
07/2022
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg25 mm15.60"2560x1440
84.6 %
01/2022
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2 kg19.8 mm15.60"3840x2160
88.4 %
07/2022
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg26.6 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.4 %
06/2022
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.4 mm15.60"3840x2160
89.1 %
03/2022
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440

Case: Thicker and heavier again

Schenker uses a new case, the Clevo PD50PNT. The display lid and the bottom shell are still made of aluminum, while the display bezel and the top shell are made of plastic. The display lid and base make slight creaking noises under torsion, but still give a sufficiently sturdy impression, especially the base. No uneven gaps were found, and the workmanship is on a good level.

The design is relatively simple and kept in black, which should also appeal to content creators. The XMG logo is barely visible on the lid because it is also dark. The surfaces are a magnet for fingerprints and grease marks.

XMG Pro 15 (left) vs XMG Neo 15 (right)
XMG Pro 15 (left) vs XMG Neo 15 (right)

Interestingly, the new Pro 15 is slightly thicker (~25 mm) and heavier than its direct predecessor (19.8 mm). Width and depth, on the other hand, have remained almost the same, but the weight has increased by around 300 g.

This brings it closer to the XMG Neo 15 (26.6 mm), thus no longer ranking among the very thin devices that attempt to reach the dimensions of a Razer Blade 15 (~17 mm).

Size Comparison

360.2 mm / 14.2 inch 243.5 mm / 9.59 inch 26.6 mm / 1.047 inch 2.3 kg4.98 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 240 mm / 9.45 inch 25 mm / 0.984 inch 2.4 kg5.27 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 267 mm / 10.5 inch 23.4 mm / 0.921 inch 2.4 kg5.37 lbs357.5 mm / 14.1 inch 238 mm / 9.37 inch 19.8 mm / 0.78 inch 2 kg4.4 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 16.99 mm / 0.669 inch 2.1 kg4.64 lbs

Equipment: VR ready and MicroSD

Schenker has reintroduced a card reader, but only in MicroSD format; the predecessor did not have an SD reader. This also changes the distribution of the USB ports: The two USB-A ports are now on the left, while a USB-C port is located on the right in addition to the microSD reader. 

The fingerprint sensor
The fingerprint sensor

Together with a MiniDP on the back, this makes the Pro 15 VR capable.

A fingerprint sensor has been integrated into the upper left corner of the touchpad.

The distribution of the ports is acceptable, but a thick network cable may get in the way of the right mouse hand.

Left: 2x USB-A 3.0, headset, microphone
Left: 2x USB-A 3.0, headset, microphone
Right: MicroSD reader, USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (DisplayPort 1.4, G-SYNC compatible, Power Delivery: no), RJ45/LAN
Right: MicroSD reader, USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (DisplayPort 1.4, G-SYNC compatible, Power Delivery: no), RJ45/LAN
Rear: Power, Thunderbolt 4/USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery: no), HDMI, MiniDP, Kensington
Rear: Power, Thunderbolt 4/USB-C 3.2 Gen2 (DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery: no), HDMI, MiniDP, Kensington

SD Card Reader

The MicroSD reader has a snap-in mechanism so that the card hardly sticks out. However, speeds with our AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 test card are below average. The reader of the Razer Blade is twice as fast.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s ∼100% +116%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.5 - 222, n=85, last 2 years)
115.7 MB/s ∼70% +51%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
100.5 (59.03min - 141.54max) MB/s ∼61% +31%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
78 MB/s ∼47% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
76.5 (59.03min - 141.54max) MB/s ∼46%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s ∼100% +100%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 263, n=74, last 2 years)
139.3 MB/s ∼77% +53%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
90.96 MB/s ∼50%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
83.05 MB/s ∼46% -9%

Communication

The manufacturer has opted for the popular Intel AX201 WiFi module, which does not yet support Wi-Fi 6e, but connects to 5 GHz networks.

The transfer rates of the Pro 15 are consistently in the high range.

The WiFi module sits underneath the SSD
The WiFi module sits underneath the SSD
An unscrewed SSD reveals the AX201
An unscrewed SSD reveals the AX201
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1528 (1341min - 1654max) MBit/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1460 (1142min - 1595max) MBit/s ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (450 - 1603, n=122, last 2 years)
1164 MBit/s ∼76%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1470 (1448min - 1522max) MBit/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1290 (800min - 1659max) MBit/s ∼88%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=122, last 2 years)
1226 MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1714 (1600min - 1749max) MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1668 (829min - 1696max) MBit/s ∼97%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1667 (839min - 1727max) MBit/s ∼97% 0%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (1167 - 1734, n=26)
1567 MBit/s ∼91% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1748, n=32, last 2 years)
1535 MBit/s ∼90% -8%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1640 (827min - 1691max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1617 (831min - 1687max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1592 (1234min - 1729max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (925 - 1715, n=21)
1426 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (740 - 1695, n=27, last 2 years)
1406 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1639 (829-1696)
Razer Blade 15 2022  ; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1470 (1448-1522)
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1613 (827-1691)
Razer Blade 15 2022  ; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1529 (1341-1654)

Webcam

The webcam also gets an upgrade, namely from 720p to 1080p, which is Full HD. We measured acceptable color deviations, but the picture looks a bit grainy (outdoors, shadows) and pale despite Full HD.

ColorChecker
15.3 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
15 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti): 15.56 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 21.66 ∆E

Security

The Pro 15 offers a Kensington port, TPM, and a fingerprint sensor.

The sensor's integration into Windows Hello works reliably, and logging in is very fast.

Accessories and Warranty

The typical Schenker accessories, such as a USB stick with drivers or a mouse pad, are missing from the Pro, which only comes with a CD driver.

Schenker offers a 24-month warranty in Germany.

Maintenance

The aluminum underside is secured by 16 Phillips screws. Not even the Neo with its water ports has so many (14). Fortunately, all screws have the same length, so there is no confusion.

The baseplate can then be removed very easily without any additional tools, and you have access to the battery, the fans, the two M.2 slots and the RAM. Only the WiFi module is hidden, namely underneath the SSD, which is perhaps not so optimal in terms of cooling.

The XMG Pro 15 minus the underside
The XMG Pro 15 minus the underside
The two RAM slots sit on top of each other
The two RAM slots sit on top of each other

Input Devices: Per-key RGB

Keyboard

Instead of the optomechanical keyboard like in the Neo 15, Schenker uses a "normal" chiclet keyboard with RGB backlighting for each key in the Pro 15.

The layout is very tidy. While the keys have a small design, they are well spaced and there is still room for a numpad on the right. 

The power button
The power button
Per-key RGB
Per-key RGB
Normal size arrow keys
Normal size arrow keys

The power button has been installed as an extra key above the keyboard, and the arrow keys are of a normal size. Only the F keys have been halved in height. The lettering is not very large, but easy to read thanks to the clear white.

Typing is uncomplicated and fast, key travel is acceptable, and key feedback is palpable. Stroke noise is moderate.

Keyboard
Keyboard
Halved F keys
Halved F keys

Touchpad

Touchpad
Touchpad

The wide touchpad (~12.1 x 7.3 cm) has good gliding properties; only during very slow movements can it falter slightly. The dedicated mouse buttons of the predecessor are now history, unfortunately. The clicks of the integrated buttons are short, crisp and reliable, and the noise moderate to medium loud.

Display: Good color space coverage

Grainy due to the matte pixel grid
Grainy due to the matte pixel grid
Barely visible screen bleeding
Barely visible screen bleeding

Schenker uses a matte QHD IPS panel (2560 x 1440) from BOE with 165 Hz. Alternatively, the high quality 4K OLED option of the predecessor is again available, as well as a Full HD panel with poorer color space coverage.

The brightness is just under 300 nits due to the less-than-uniform illumination. The contrast ratio could also be a little higher, but it is okay. Overall, the display doesn't deliver top values, but it is well-rounded overall: good response times, acceptable brightness and good color space coverage.

PWM is not used for brightness control. Screen bleeding is extremely minimal and hardly noticeable even in dark environments.

290
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE09C2 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1)
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 320 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 294.1 cd/m² Minimum: 19.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 319 cd/m²
Contrast: 991:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.22 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 4.09
ΔE Greyscale 4.41 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
85.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
BOE09C2 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung ATNA56WR14-0, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
BOE0A67, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
AUO51EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display
-5%
-17%
-3%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
97.5
81.2
-17%
68.2
-30%
80.4
-18%
99.1
2%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
97.7
-2%
97.2
-3%
98.4
-2%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
85.2
89.1
5%
69.4
-19%
94.7
11%
86.8
2%
Response Times
79%
3%
-44%
-21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.2 ?(6.2, 7)
3.2 ?(1.2, 2)
76%
12.4 ?(5.8, 6.6)
6%
18.8 ?(9.2, 9.6)
-42%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-9%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 ?(4.2, 4.6)
1.6 ?(1, 0.6)
82%
8.8 ?(4.6, 4.2)
-0%
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
-45%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-32%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(81)
Screen
294%
35%
13%
21%
Brightness middle
317
443
40%
365
15%
351
11%
286
-10%
Brightness
294
434
48%
335
14%
347
18%
271
-8%
Brightness Distribution
83
94
13%
81
-2%
90
8%
89
7%
Black Level *
0.32
0.02
94%
0.32
-0%
0.35
-9%
0.25
22%
Contrast
991
22150
2135%
1141
15%
1003
1%
1144
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.22
3.73
12%
1.38
67%
2.54
40%
2.74
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.97
8.12
-36%
2.01
66%
8.36
-40%
5.21
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.09
1.22
70%
0.67
84%
2.52
38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.41
2.5
43%
1.36
69%
4.1
7%
1.1
75%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.001 110%
2.48 89%
2.089 105%
2.2 100%
CCT
6733 97%
6522 100%
6412 101%
7036 92%
6408 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
123% / 192%
7% / 19%
-11% / 2%
0% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

The panel in the Pro 15 covers sRGB completely and DCI-P3 at over 97 percent, AdobeRGB at 85 percent. Unlike the Neo, the panel is thus suitable for editing photos and videos.

sRGB
sRGB
DCI-P3
DCI-P3
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB

The display is properly calibrated ex-works; manual calibration hardly changes the average color deviation values.

Grayscale
Grayscale
Saturation
Saturation
ColorChecker
ColorChecker
Grayscale calibrated
Grayscale calibrated
Saturation calibrated
Saturation calibrated
ColorChecker calibrated
ColorChecker calibrated

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.2 ms rise
↘ 4.6 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.2 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19657 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The matte surface eliminates many reflections outdoors. However, due to the rather average brightness and a not-too high contrast, you should stay in the shade and ensure a direct frontal view.

Outside in the shade.
Outside in the shade.
Reflections at extreme viewing angles.
Reflections at extreme viewing angles.

As is typical for IPS, the viewing angle stability is very good. Only under extreme viewing angles do brightness and colors suffer a little.

Performance: High performance, no DDR5

The XMG Pro 15 is aimed at gamers as well as content creators, which is reflected in the sleek design and the strong hardware (i7-12700H and RTX 3080 Ti) on the one hand, and in the QHD display with its good color space coverage on the other hand. A generous 32 GB of RAM also benefits both parties, but this is unfortunately only available in the DDR4 version here, unlike in the Neo.

Testing Conditions

All important performance settings are adjusted in the XMG Control Center; Schenker uses different software here than in the XMG Neo. Manual settings for the offset values or Dynamic Boost are largely absent. Only the fan curve can be adjusted manually.

On the other hand, four performance modes can be selected: Silent, Power Saving, Entertainment and Performance. For the best benchmark results, we carried out our tests in the most powerful mode, which is Performance mode. However, Schenker recommends Entertainment mode, which is intended to be a good compromise between performance and noise.

The main menu of the XMG Control Center
The main menu of the XMG Control Center
The 4 performance profiles
The 4 performance profiles

Processor

An Intel Core i7-12700H is used as the CPU (14 cores, 20 threads). The combined E and P cores roughly clock from 1.8 to 4.7 GHz. The CPU is very powerful and is used in many Intel gaming laptops.

In the Cinebench loop, the performance drops slightly over longer periods of time. Nevertheless, the curve is comparable to that of the MSI Raider GE66 with its i9-12900H, but the same i7-12700H is even faster in the Neo 15.

Cinebench Loop: TDP in Performance mode
Cinebench Loop: TDP in Performance mode
Cinebench Loop: TDP in Entertainment mode
Cinebench Loop: TDP in Entertainment mode
Cinebench Loop: TDP in Battery mode
Cinebench Loop: TDP in Battery mode

The TDP only briefly draws 116 W in the first run, after which it drops and stabilizes at around 80 to 85 W.

In Entertainment mode (instead of performance mode), the TDP briefly extracts 108 W in the first run before also dropping and stabilizing at 45 W with very short initial peaks of 55 to 80 W.

The Pro 15 beats the i7-11800H in the predecessor by around 30%. Overall, CPU performance in the Neo 15 and the MSI Raider is a few percentage points better, but the Pro 15 is still on a very good level, namely slightly above the expected rates.

In Battery mode, the maximum power consumption is only 25 W, and the TDP sometimes drops to 16 W during the Cinebench runs. Performance is correspondingly lower, seeing reductions of around 57% compared to the plugged-in Performance mode.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2453 (2374.03-2671.12)
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1929 (1910.86-2050.14)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2688 (2667.56-2711.13)
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2467 (2423.65-2668.98)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
82.2 pt ∼82%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
81.5 pt ∼82%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
77.1 pt ∼77%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
73.6 pt ∼74%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
73.2 pt ∼73%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
63.2 pt ∼63%
Average of class Gaming
 
61.1 pt ∼61%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
17626 Points ∼100% +11%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
16530 Points ∼94% +4%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
15945 Points ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19250, n=42)
15451 Points ∼88% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points ∼84% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 23482, n=203, last 2 years)
12781 Points ∼73% -20%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12721 Points ∼72% -20%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1855 Points ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1815 Points ∼98%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1808 Points ∼97% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points ∼97% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1825, n=41)
1758 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1936, n=202, last 2 years)
1525 Points ∼82% -16%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1513 Points ∼82% -17%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
6741 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6271 Points ∼93% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5974 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7382, n=42)
5849 Points ∼87% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points ∼85% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 9042, n=227, last 2 years)
4790 Points ∼71% -20%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4756 Points ∼71% -20%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
717 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
697 Points ∼97%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points ∼96% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
690 Points ∼96% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 702, n=42)
676 Points ∼94% -3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
585 Points ∼82% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 745, n=227, last 2 years)
581 Points ∼81% -17%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2711 (2667.56min - 2711.13max) Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2671 (2374.03min - 2671.12max) Points ∼99%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2669 (2423.65min - 2668.98max) Points ∼98% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2903, n=47)
2507 Points ∼92% -6%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points ∼80% -18%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
2050 Points ∼76% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3652, n=230, last 2 years)
2025 Points ∼75% -24%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
267 Points ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points ∼99%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
262 Points ∼98% 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=43)
253 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 282, n=221, last 2 years)
231 Points ∼87% -12%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
225 Points ∼84% -14%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
280 Seconds * ∼100% -42%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
243 Seconds * ∼87% -23%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (171 - 732, n=41)
230 Seconds * ∼82% -17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * ∼81% -15%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
196.8 Seconds * ∼70%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
195.9 Seconds * ∼70% -0%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
177.7 Seconds * ∼63% +10%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
71756 MIPS ∼100% +13%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
69083 MIPS ∼96% +8%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
63702 MIPS ∼89%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS ∼86% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=41)
60063 MIPS ∼84% -6%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
55743 MIPS ∼78% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 88128, n=225, last 2 years)
53001 MIPS ∼74% -17%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5981 MIPS ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5848 MIPS ∼98% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5769 MIPS ∼96%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS ∼96% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5907, n=41)
5603 MIPS ∼94% -3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5521 MIPS ∼92% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=225, last 2 years)
5514 MIPS ∼92% -4%
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13722 Points ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
13161 Points ∼96% +11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points ∼91% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
11804 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=42)
11762 Points ∼86% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
9408 Points ∼69% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 16925, n=219, last 2 years)
9203 Points ∼67% -22%
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1861 Points ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1775 Points ∼95%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points ∼94% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1755 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=42)
1728 Points ∼93% -3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1571 Points ∼84% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1949, n=219, last 2 years)
1523 Points ∼82% -14%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.7 fps ∼100% +13%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.4 fps ∼89% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
18.4 fps ∼89%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps ∼83% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.4, n=43)
16.6 fps ∼80% -10%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.7 fps ∼76% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 26.6, n=229, last 2 years)
14.8 fps ∼71% -20%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (33.6 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
52.2 s * ∼100% -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * ∼99% -5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
49 s * ∼94%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
48.8 s * ∼93% -0%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
48.2 s * ∼92% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 92, n=41)
45.5 s * ∼87% +7%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
36.3 s * ∼70% +26%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.549 sec * ∼100% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=224, last 2 years)
0.546 sec * ∼99% -21%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=41)
0.4749 sec * ∼87% -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * ∼86% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4565 sec * ∼83% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.453 sec * ∼83%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4392 sec * ∼80% +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2671 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
190.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
263 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
92.1 pt ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
 
79.2 pt ∼79%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
76.3 pt ∼76%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
75.6 pt ∼76%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
71.9 pt ∼72%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
70.3 pt ∼70%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67.4 pt ∼67%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
15493 KRay/s ∼100% +80%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 22183, n=185, last 2 years)
11866 KRay/s ∼77% +38%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9159 KRay/s ∼59% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 16445, n=41)
9122 KRay/s ∼59% +6%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8594 KRay/s ∼55%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8538 KRay/s ∼55% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s ∼50% -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
64283 Points ∼100% +62%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=185, last 2 years)
64095 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 82001, n=41)
43297 Points ∼67% +9%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41723 Points ∼65% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39644 Points ∼62%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38656 Points ∼60% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points ∼57% -7%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
4332 MB/s ∼100% +46%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3235 MB/s ∼75% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 5123, n=185, last 2 years)
3023 MB/s ∼70% +2%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2992 MB/s ∼69% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2977 MB/s ∼69%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 3912, n=41)
2893 MB/s ∼67% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s ∼62% -10%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
105314 Points ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98903 Points ∼94%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98058 Points ∼93% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 102833, n=41)
96679 Points ∼92% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points ∼89% -5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
91924 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 132615, n=185, last 2 years)
91718 Points ∼87% -7%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=185, last 2 years)
10129 Points ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9923 Points ∼98% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9787 Points ∼97% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9736 Points ∼96%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9652 Points ∼95% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points ∼91% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9928, n=41)
8979 Points ∼89% -8%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
38524 Points ∼100% +63%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=185, last 2 years)
35082 Points ∼91% +48%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
25690 Points ∼67% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 40117, n=41)
24367 Points ∼63% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23664 Points ∼61%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23070 Points ∼60% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points ∼55% -10%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
145983 MB/s ∼100% +138%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95126 MB/s ∼65% +55%
Average of class Gaming
  (18146 - 183146, n=185, last 2 years)
89039 MB/s ∼61% +45%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 139251, n=41)
78836 MB/s ∼54% +29%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64966 MB/s ∼45% +6%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61255 MB/s ∼42%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s ∼38% -9%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1057 MB/s ∼94%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1056 MB/s ∼94% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=41)
960 MB/s ∼85% -9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s ∼82% -12%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
807 MB/s ∼72% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1408, n=206, last 2 years)
740 MB/s ∼66% -30%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
8393 KRay/s ∼100% +67%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 11913, n=185, last 2 years)
6448 KRay/s ∼77% +28%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5337 KRay/s ∼64% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 8596, n=41)
5152 KRay/s ∼61% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5040 KRay/s ∼60%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4924 KRay/s ∼59% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s ∼50% -17%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s ∼100% +44%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40648 MPixel/s ∼99% +42%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40310 MPixel/s ∼98% +41%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 46643, n=41)
33355 MPixel/s ∼81% +17%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
28540 MPixel/s ∼70%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
26732 MPixel/s ∼65% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 47710, n=185, last 2 years)
26286 MPixel/s ∼64% -8%

System Performance

In PCMark 10, the benchmark values are roughly on par with the expected level, but performance falls sharply in the area of content creation.

PCMark 10 keeps crashing on the Pro 15
PCMark 10 keeps crashing on the Pro 15
The only assessable test run, low value in content creation
The only assessable test run, low value in content creation
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8178 Points ∼100% +19%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points ∼94% +12%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7579 Points ∼93% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6868 - 7579, n=6)
7340 Points ∼90% +7%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6868 Points ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (4477 - 8636, n=181, last 2 years)
6819 Points ∼83% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6673 Points ∼82% -3%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11078 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10758 Points ∼97%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points ∼97% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10586 Points ∼96% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9987 - 10758, n=6)
10414 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (7334 - 11205, n=180, last 2 years)
10025 Points ∼90% -7%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9862 Points ∼89% -8%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10422 Points ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points ∼92% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8944 - 9613, n=6)
9273 Points ∼89% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9124 Points ∼88%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9111 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10932, n=180, last 2 years)
9001 Points ∼86% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8278 Points ∼79% -9%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12857 Points ∼100% +44%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
12249 Points ∼95% +37%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points ∼94% +35%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8956 - 12249, n=6)
11155 Points ∼87% +25%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9881 Points ∼77% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (4716 - 14291, n=180, last 2 years)
9622 Points ∼75% +7%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8956 Points ∼70%
CrossMark / Overall
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1761 - 1861, n=3)
1810 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1808 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2170, n=49, last 2 years)
1788 Points ∼99%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1683 Points ∼93%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=49, last 2 years)
1728 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1645 - 1786, n=3)
1709 Points ∼99%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1696 Points ∼98%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1660 Points ∼96%
CrossMark / Creativity
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2041 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1936 - 2041, n=3)
1994 Points ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2366, n=49, last 2 years)
1886 Points ∼92%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1725 Points ∼85%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=49, last 2 years)
1700 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1633 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1461 - 1868, n=3)
1618 Points ∼95%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1526 Points ∼90%
PCMark 10 Score
6868 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62959 MB/s ∼100% +32%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62646 MB/s ∼100% +31%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s ∼99% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31252 - 77803, n=41)
55188 MB/s ∼88% +15%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
48016 MB/s ∼76% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
47821 MB/s ∼76%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=185, last 2 years)
45888 MB/s ∼73% -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66798 MB/s ∼100% +47%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66478 MB/s ∼100% +46%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s ∼99% +45%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (32677 - 76185, n=41)
59002 MB/s ∼88% +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=185, last 2 years)
49466 MB/s ∼74% +9%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
48045 MB/s ∼72% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
45585 MB/s ∼68%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s ∼100% +50%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65252 MB/s ∼99% +48%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65001 MB/s ∼98% +48%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (30592 - 66475, n=41)
55393 MB/s ∼84% +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 68782, n=185, last 2 years)
47278 MB/s ∼72% +7%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46214 MB/s ∼70% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
44062 MB/s ∼67%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93.7 ns * ∼100%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93.6 ns * ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=41)
66.8 (76.2min - 133.9max) ns * ∼71%
Average of class Gaming
  (76.2 - 122, n=207, last 2 years)
63.1 ns * ∼67%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latency

Browser opening did not cause any problems, but there were issues when loading our website. The determined latency increased when opening multiple tabs and when playing our 4K/60 fps YouTube video. At the very least, the video ran without dropped frames, but the latency is still relatively quite high.

YouTube test
YouTube test
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Drivers
LatencyMon Drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5785 μs * ∼100% -239%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2181.7 μs * ∼38% -28%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1707.9 μs * ∼30%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * ∼24% +20%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1056 μs * ∼18% +38%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

The installed Samsung SSD 980 Pro with 1 TB and PCIe 4.0 ranks 11th in our SSD/HDD best list. It is also quite fast in the Pro 15, but the sustained performance is not constant, which means the performance can be significantly lower. This may indicate a possible cooling problem here, which could also explain the low PCMark10 score.

Right next to the Samsung SSD is another M.2 slot for a secondary storage drive.

Upon enquiry, the manufacturer stated that the review sample was issued by XMG before the internal release of the model series and is said to have an incorrect cooling pad that is not used in the series model. Apparently, however, there is nothing unusual about the cooling pad. The XMG Pro 17 also shows a decrease in the long-term performance of the SSD under testing.

The two SSD slots
The two SSD slots
Wrong cooling pad? Looks fine.
Wrong cooling pad? Looks fine.
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6970.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5187.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 611.39 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 372.73 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 77.03 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 218.06 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1071.21 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1675.99 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
92.1 pt ∼92%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
82.1 pt ∼82%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
 
79.5 pt ∼80%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.1 pt ∼77%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
70.8 pt ∼71%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
66.5 pt ∼67%
Average of class Gaming
 
57.5 pt ∼58%
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s ∼100% +10%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2659 - 4315, n=19)
3885 MB/s ∼94% +4%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3829 (3821.85min - 3829.08max) MB/s ∼93% +3%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3813 (3795.59min - 3813.38max) MB/s ∼93% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3729 (3701.62min - 3728.53max) MB/s ∼91%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3705 (3693.25min - 3705.04max) MB/s ∼90% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (170 - 5544, n=177, last 2 years)
2645 MB/s ∼64% -29%
seq write
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4318 (3897.94min - 4317.86max) MB/s ∼100% +12%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s ∼97% +8%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2839 - 4360, n=19)
3944 MB/s ∼91% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3842 (3807.31min - 3842.06max) MB/s ∼89%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3838 (3792.07min - 3837.66max) MB/s ∼89% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3185 (2997.88min - 3185.36max) MB/s ∼74% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (174 - 7889, n=176, last 2 years)
2858 MB/s ∼66% -26%
seq q8 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6902 (6621.55min - 6902.36max) MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6809 (5948.57min - 6809.45max) MB/s ∼98% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6672 (6155.41min - 6672.09max) MB/s ∼96% -3%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3227 - 6902, n=19)
6469 MB/s ∼93% -6%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5358 (3289.72min - 5358.22max) MB/s ∼77% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 13195, n=177, last 2 years)
4421 MB/s ∼64% -36%
seq q8 t1 write
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4970 (4954.68min - 4969.54max) MB/s ∼100% 0%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4951 (4919.31min - 4950.75max) MB/s ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4951 (4934.17min - 4950.75max) MB/s ∼100%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3184 - 5043, n=19)
4838 MB/s ∼97% -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s ∼95% -4%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4124 (2287.86min - 4123.91max) MB/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 10203, n=177, last 2 years)
3450 MB/s ∼69% -30%
4k q1 t1 read
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
91.1 (88.95min - 91.1max) MB/s ∼100%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
88.3 (86.45min - 88.29max) MB/s ∼97% -3%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (62.7 - 94.3, n=19)
81.7 MB/s ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
74.7 (73.84min - 74.66max) MB/s ∼82% -18%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
62.7 (62.59min - 62.69max) MB/s ∼69% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.53 - 97.4, n=177, last 2 years)
60.2 MB/s ∼66% -34%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
273 (271.29min - 273.19max) MB/s ∼100% +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s ∼94% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
253 (252.33min - 253.48max) MB/s ∼93%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
246 (245.08min - 246.35max) MB/s ∼90% -3%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (152.9 - 279, n=19)
223 MB/s ∼82% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.79 - 421, n=176, last 2 years)