Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarSchenker XMG Pro 15 (Clevo PC50DS) with RTX 3080 in Review: Ultra-Thin and Lightweight High-End All-Rounder
Compared to last year’s Pro 15, the new XMG Pro 15 is a completely different device and much more akin to a refresh of Schenker’s Key 15, Schenker’s blueprint for the Intel-based Pro 15 and the AMD-based Neo 15. Its highlight is the upgrade to Nvidia’s brand-new RTX 3080 generation of GPUs, and the Schenker logo on the lid has been replaced with an XMG logo.
Schenker’s own webstore, bestware.com, allows for a very detailed individualization with the only fixed component being the processor. While our review unit came equipped with an RTX 3080 over the Key 15’s RTX 2080 Super Max-Q you can also select an RTX 3070 instead. Please note that our review unit also came without a valid Windows license. While the operating system was preloaded on the device it will need to be activated with a valid key and license. Schenker will sell you an optional Windows 10 Home license for an additional 100 Euros.
According to the OEM, the Pro 15 is not only a highly portable gaming laptop but also a smart workstation for creative professionals. In other words, a true jack of all trades instead of a pure-bred gaming device.
Our comparison group for this thin performance behemoth consists of its own predecessor, similarly equipped laptops, and laptops with previous generation RTX GPUs.
Working For Notebookcheck
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!
News Writer (AUS/NZL based) - Details here
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 % | 03/2021 | Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.5 % | 09/2020 | Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.3 % | 02/2020 | Schenker XMG Pro 15 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 30 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.8 % | 02/2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
| 86.6 % | 02/2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 20.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
| 87.8 % | 02/2021 | Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 |
Case – Thin and Light despite the Use of Metal
The case makes no attempts of hiding its Key15 lineage. Visually, the Clevo PC50DS is identical to the Key 15’s Clevo PC50DN2. Compared to last year’s much bulkier Pro 15 it is aimed at a much broader audience and thus lacks the usual bling-bling that OEMs use to attract gamers. As a result, the new model would not look out of place in an office environment. The case consists of dark aluminum, save for the display bezels, and is surprisingly lightweight considering its powerful internal hardware.
Thanks to its metal build it is comparatively sturdy. However, due to the thinness of the aluminum used you can still twist and warp it slightly. As expected, the display lid is not as sturdy and stiff as the base, and we would have wished for stronger hinges as well.
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
The Pro 15’s footprint and weight are identical to the Key 15. The previous model was around 500 g (1.1 lbs.) heavier and around 1 cm (0.4 inches) thicker and 2 cm (0.8 inches) deeper. The only competitor capable of keeping up in specs, size, and weight is the Asus ROG Zephyrus G15.
Connectivity – microSD and Thunderbolt 3
Unfortunately, the laptop’s card reader can only take microSD cards. Other ports include four USB ports, HDMI 2.1, miniDP, LAN, and two audio jacks.
Just like on its spiritual predecessor these ports are not only located on the sides but also the rear, which is a big plus as it frees up space on the sides by relocating the often quite beefy display cables to the rear. With that said we would have preferred for the frequently used USB-C port to be located on one of the sides instead.
Communication
Intel’s AX201 provides the device with Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 capabilities. Wi-Fi performance turned out to be a double-edged sword. While transmitting data was very fast and the Pro 15 stormed to the top of its comparison group its RX performance was abysmal resulting in last place. With that said its RX performance was still well above the gaming class average. The ethernet port was upgraded to 2.5 Gbps.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Average of class Gaming (496 - 1645, n=160, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=298) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=298) | |
| Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Webcam
As before the webcam suffers from very high color deviations and is certainly not one of the device’s highlights. There is no dedicated webcam shutter mechanism.
Security
Given that Schenker clearly positions the Pro 15 as an alternative for content creators we would have wished for more than just a TPM 2.0 chip and a Kensington port.
Accessories
Compared to other OEMs Schenker turned out to be quite generous.
In addition to the device itself and a power supply the box also contains a fairly hefty manual, a driver CD, a thumb drive, a velvet cleaning cloth, and a small thermal conductive pad.
Maintenance
The bottom panel is secured by 13 screws of two differing lengths. Once undone the panel can be removed without additional tools. We found it best to start around the ethernet port or at the front right corner.
Once inside you have access to the RAM, the fans, both SSD slots, the Wi-Fi modem, and the battery. All things considered the Pro 15 is fairly well maintainable.
Warranty
By default, the XMG Pro 15 comes with 24 months of warranty that can be optionally extended to a total of 36 months.
During the first six months, Schenker offers expedited repairs within 48 hours including free shipping and a free system check.
Input Devices – Pro 15 with per-key RGB
Keyboard
The input devices seem to have been taken straight out of the Pro 15’s predecessor, which is not necessarily a bad thing. The result is a clean layout with regular sized arrow keys and a narrow numpad along the right-hand side. Key travel is decent, feedback is well pronounced, and the overall level of noise and clatter is moderate.
As before, the keyboard tends to flex slightly when used, which did not cause any major issues during everyday use. Its highlight is without a doubt the 4-stage per-key RGB lighting. Macros for single keys as well as key combinations can be defined in the included Control Center software.
Touchpad
The glass-covered touchpad is very smooth and turned out to be precise even with slow movements of the finger.
The dedicated mouse buttons offer a pleasantly soft accentuation point and are as a result also fairly quiet overall.
Display – XMG Offers Various Options
A total of five display options are available for the Pro 15. Our review unit came equipped with an AU Optronics FHD IPS panel with a refresh rate of 300 Hz.
Other options include three additional FHD displays with a refresh rate of 144 Hz, two made by LG (one of which is X-Rite/Panton-calibrated) and one made by AU Optronics.
The fifth and final option is a 4K UHD Pantone-calibrated OLED panel made by Samsung. It offers a higher brightness (400 nits) and higher color space coverage but a lower refresh rate of just 60 Hz.
Our review unit’s average display brightness was a decent and acceptable 335 nits with a brightness distribution of 89 percent.
We found no evidence of screen bleeding on our review unit.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 327 cd/m²
Contrast: 1486:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.18 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 1
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.83% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.65% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.123
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) AU Optronics AUO7A8C (B156HAN12.0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Panda LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Schenker XMG Pro 15 AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q CMN N156KME-GNA (CMN152A), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS AU Optronics B156ZAN05.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -4% | 21% | 23% | 23% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.2 | 67.24 -3% | 66.67 -4% | 97.25 41% | 89.06 29% | 88.6 28% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.65 | 96.2 -3% | 94.37 -5% | 99.92 0% | 99.91 0% | 99.98 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.83 | 68.67 -3% | 68.1 -4% | 86.17 22% | 99.11 40% | 99.94 41% |
| Response Times | -85% | -195% | -78% | -66% | -171% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3.6 ? | 10 ? -178% | 17.2 ? -378% | 8.8 ? -144% | 8.2 ? -128% | 15.2 ? -322% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 9.2 ? 8% | 11.2 ? -12% | 11.2 ? -12% | 10.4 ? -4% | 12 ? -20% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -76% | -38% | -42% | -47% | -86% | |
| Brightness middle | 327 | 300 -8% | 346 6% | 327 0% | 406 24% | 407.2 25% |
| Brightness | 335 | 281 -16% | 346 3% | 309 -8% | 407 21% | 403 20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 80 -10% | 89 0% | 89 0% | 88 -1% | 90 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.29 -32% | 0.28 -27% | 0.33 -50% | 0.42 -91% | 0.42 -91% |
| Contrast | 1486 | 1034 -30% | 1236 -17% | 991 -33% | 967 -35% | 970 -35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.18 | 5.39 -147% | 4.62 -112% | 4.49 -106% | 4.36 -100% | 7.25 -233% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.24 | 14.35 -238% | 8.93 -111% | 8.42 -99% | 7.55 -78% | 12.51 -195% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 1.73 -73% | 1.58 -58% | 2.27 -127% | 3.63 -263% | 3.62 -262% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 9.8 -277% | 4.95 -90% | 4.2 -62% | 3.1 -19% | 8.1 -212% |
| Gamma | 2.123 104% | 2.019 109% | 2.36 93% | 2.173 101% | 2.36 93% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6815 95% | 8174 80% | 7733 84% | 7014 93% | 6371 102% | 5925 110% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 71 | 69 -3% | 61 -14% | 86 21% | 86.7 22% | 88.1 24% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 92 -1% | 94 1% | 99 6% | 99.9 7% | 100 8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -55% /
-63% | -79% /
-51% | -33% /
-34% | -30% /
-36% | -78% /
-76% |
* ... smaller is better
Both contrast and black point were among the best of its class. While the display was fairly well calibrated by default, we were able to further lower color deviations through manual calibration. Overall, the display was very decent and much better than that of many of the Pro 15’s competitors.
Response times were among the fastest among its peers. The internal display is thus very well suited for fast-paced action games.
With 93 % sRGB and 71 % AdobeRGB color space coverage was decent overall. Like most 4K competitors the optional 4K panel will offer higher color gamut levels.
Thanks to its matte surface and its good maximum brightness of more than 300 nits the powerful all-rounder turned out to be well usable outdoors, at least in in the shade.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20851 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
As expected of an IPS panel viewing angles were fairly wide. With that said we did notice a fair amount of darkening when looked at from the sides that remained consistent with increasing angles.
Performance – RTX 3080 better than RTX 2080 Super?
With its Intel Core i7-10870H, an Nvidia RTX 3080, 16 GB of RAM, and a 1 TB SSD the XMG Pro 15 is without a doubt a high-end gamer. However, with its lightweight and thin design it is also aimed at professionals looking for a workstation. In other words, it should cover every single conceivable use case.
Before running our benchmarks, we enabled the performance mode in Control Center, which increases the TDP threshold for the GPU to 105 W. In the more balanced entertainment mode, the GPU is limited to just 95 W, and even more so in power saver mode. The same applies to the CPU.
Processor
Intel’s Core i7-10870H runs at a base frequency of 2.2 GHz with a turbo boost of up to 5 GHz. It features 8 cores with support for Hyperthreading and can therefore process up to 16 threads simultaneously. Even though it is nominally 100 MHz slower than the Key 15’s Core i7-10875H its Cinebench R15 performance is higher. When compared with the Razer Blade it is initially faster but settles at a similar level in the long run. With that said the AMD CPUs in Asus’s line-up are miles ahead of Intel’s current offerings. Overall, CPU performance was right where we would have expected.
During the first three runs we measured the CPU’s TDP at a constant 104 W. Starting with the fourth iteration, this maximum TDP was only applied for about one second at the very beginning of each run and dropped to around 53 W thereafter.
On battery, CPU performance decreased by around 30 to 40 %, partly because performance mode for the fans is not available on battery.
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Average of class Gaming (108 - 275, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (196 - 204, n=11) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Average of class Gaming (536 - 2909, n=213, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (1336 - 1740, n=14) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Average of class Gaming (179 - 555, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (272 - 333, n=12) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 | |
| 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (5145 - 5429, n=12) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2945 - 6506, n=195, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Average of class Gaming (15146 - 76063, n=195, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (39581 - 46708, n=12) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Average of class Gaming (312 - 734, n=198, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (460 - 484, n=12) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Average of class Gaming (1397 - 6849, n=199, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (3027 - 4020, n=12) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| Geekbench 5.3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Average of class Gaming (703 - 1918, n=189, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (1191 - 1295, n=12) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (6403 - 7882, n=12) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2783 - 13648, n=189, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.13 - 19.9, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (10.7 - 13.5, n=12) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 113, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (46 - 64.4, n=12) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10870H (0.573 - 0.614, n=12) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.4252 - 1.088, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
System performance was on a par with the larger 17-inch Razer Blade Pro 17, around 2-20 % faster than on the Key 15, and much faster than on the previous Pro 15. With that said the differences between the various devices in our comparison group were not overly dramatic by and large.
| PCMark 10 Score | 6333 points | |
Help | ||
DPC Latencies
Thankfully, the Pro 15 turned out to be free of latency issues. LatencyMon found no evidence thereof when opening multiple tabs or playing our usual 4K 60 fps YouTube video.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Schenker’s configurator offers various SSDs by numerous manufacturers with different size options to choose from. Our review unit came equipped with a 1 TB Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus, which can be found on #20 on our SSD/HDD comparison table and can thus be considered a fairly fast SSD overall. Our review unit even managed to outperform our reference unit but was in turn outperformed by the Key 15’s SSD. With that said those differences will be mostly unnoticeable during everyday use.
The secondary slot can be equipped with the same choice of SSDs as the primary. With both slots populated the SSDs can be setup in a RAID 0 or RAID 1 array.
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | Schenker XMG Pro 15 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 4% | -11% | -6% | 30% | -18% | -6% | |
| Write 4K | 160.9 | 193 20% | 120.6 -25% | 156.4 -3% | 229.7 43% | 123.5 -23% | 160 ? -1% |
| Read 4K | 54 | 54.27 1% | 46.13 -15% | 66.69 24% | 47.13 -13% | 45.96 -15% | 51.5 ? -5% |
| Write Seq | 2944 | 2988 1% | 2900 -1% | 2318 -21% | 4455 51% | 1861 -37% | 2660 ? -10% |
| Read Seq | 2781 | 2633 -5% | 2929 5% | 2151 -23% | 2933 5% | 1584 -43% | 2390 ? -14% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 495.2 | 540 9% | 372.2 -25% | 525 6% | 597.3 21% | 466.4 -6% | 456 ? -8% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 593.2 | 619.9 5% | 422.2 -29% | 452.1 -24% | 387 -35% | 565.5 -5% | 548 ? -8% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3283 | 3284 0% | 3245 -1% | 3055 -7% | 5623 71% | 2981 -9% | 3300 ? 1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3549 | 3564 0% | 3565 0% | 3607 2% | 7042 98% | 3260 -8% | 3550 ? 0% |
| AS SSD | -12% | -5% | -22% | -23% | -55% | -10% | |
| Seq Read | 2959 | 2927.84 -1% | 2975.48 1% | 2949.59 0% | 3009.86 2% | 2068.48 -30% | 2802 ? -5% |
| Seq Write | 2521 | 2732.73 8% | 2596.92 3% | 1600.23 -37% | 3115.99 24% | 2046.62 -19% | 2641 ? 5% |
| 4K Read | 50.88 | 51.64 1% | 62.25 22% | 53.56 5% | 49.58 -3% | 47.85 -6% | 51 ? 0% |
| 4K Write | 141.06 | 129.81 -8% | 150.9 7% | 126.8 -10% | 184.98 31% | 87.38 -38% | 132 ? -6% |
| 4K-64 Read | 2110.42 | 1838.12 -13% | 1507.95 -29% | 1429.48 -32% | 1400.82 -34% | 1932.35 -8% | 1826 ? -13% |
| 4K-64 Write | 2329.04 | 2291.26 -2% | 2238.89 -4% | 2177.16 -7% | 1426.32 -39% | 2016.74 -13% | 2147 ? -8% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.034 | 0.062 -82% | 0.038 -12% | 0.064 -88% | 0.037 -9% | 0.055 -62% | 0.0459 ? -35% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.026 | 0.029 -12% | 0.025 4% | 0.029 -12% | 0.061 -135% | 0.128 -392% | 0.031 ? -19% |
| Score Read | 2457 | 2183 -11% | 1868 -24% | 1778 -28% | 1751 -29% | 2187 -11% | 2157 ? -12% |
| Score Write | 2722 | 2694 -1% | 2649 -3% | 2464 -9% | 1923 -29% | 2309 -15% | 2544 ? -7% |
| Score Total | 6412 | 5984 -7% | 5463 -15% | 5090 -21% | 4580 -29% | 5612 -12% | 5797 ? -10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-5% | -8% /
-7% | -14% /
-15% | 4% /
-0% | -37% /
-40% | -8% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Sustained read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
The laptop is equipped with an integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 as well as a dedicated Nvidia Geforce RTX 3080 GPU, and with Advanced Optimus (DDS) Nvidia has finally found a way to support both Optimus and G-Sync simultaneously. However, only one of the five displays (LG) offers G-Sync support, so our review unit was limited to Optimus support only. Our review unit’s GPU is the most powerful dedicated GPU currently available for use in laptops. However, Nvidia gives OEMs a very wide window of adjustment for the chip’s TGP. The Pro 15’s TGP was configured at 90 W plus 15 W Dynamic Boost 2.0 in performance mode, aka a maximum of 105 W. Nvidia’s specified maximum for the RTX 3080 is a much higher 150+ W.
When running 3DMark the new Pro 15 was around 20 % faster than the Key 15. In most tests, the 100 W Razer Blade performed similarly while the 130 W Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 was more often than not slightly faster.
GPU performance plummeted dramatically on battery. Running 3DMark 11 on battery yielded an 86 % lower score than before.
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (31288 - 43744, n=36) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Average of class Gaming (1925 - 45050, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 26729 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 50523 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19982 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9937 points | |
Help | ||
Gaming Performance
When running our gaming benchmarks, the Pro 15’s GPU was between 4 to 8 % slower than the average RTX 3080-equipped laptop. The RTX 2080 Super-equipped Key 15 was at eye level most of the time, and both Asus laptops were noticeably faster.
Nevertheless, overall gaming performance was very high and impressive considering the laptop’s thin design. Even current games will run smoothly at around 100 FPS in FHD on maximum details.
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (149 - 242, n=30) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| Average of class Gaming (42.1 - 247, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (85.1 - 123, n=38) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Average of class Gaming (24.3 - 126, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (79.4 - 160, n=11) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18 - 160, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (76.6 - 151, n=11) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
| Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Early 2021, RTX 3080) | |
| Schenker Key 15 Comet Lake | |
| Average of class Gaming (29 - 151, n=75, last 2 years) | |
When running our Witcher 3 loop the framerate dropped slightly by around 8 % over time, and the device almost passed but ultimately failed our Fire Strike Ultra stress test with around 95.8 %.
| low | med. | high | ultra | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 320.7 |