Notebookcheck Logo

Asus TUF Gaming F17 Laptop Review: Good 3D Performance & Battery Life Meet a Dim Display

Maximum performance. After two years Asus finally updates the series' case and adds an Alder Lake CPU with DDR5 RAM and RTX GPU, in our case an RTX 3060 with a full 140 W TGP. And while this might sound very promising we need to keep in mind that not all that glitters is gold, and the TUF Gaming F17 has a few flaws that we uncovered in our review. Update: Contrary to what was stated initially, there are no issues with the chassis

Following last year’s minor update Asus opted for a major overhaul for their affordable 17-inch gaming laptop this year. The result is a newly designed and updated case, an Intel Alder Lake CPU with DDR5 RAM support, and a total of four GPU options including our review unit’s GTX 3060.

In addition to its immediate 11th gen predecessor we included a number of 17-inch gaming notebooks in our comparison group, including the Lenovo Legion 5 17, the MSI GE76 Raider (same CPU), the MSI Katana GF76 (same GPU with 11th gen CPU), and the Schenker XMG Core 17 (10th gen CPU).

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W (TUF Gaming F17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 111 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6144 MB, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 511.79, MUX Switch
Memory
16384 MB 
, 2x 8GB DDR5-4800 (2.400 MHz), up to 32 GB
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, 1024 GB 
, 865 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset jack
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 394 x 264 ( = 0.98 x 15.51 x 10.39 in)
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720P HD camera
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo Speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.515 kg ( = 88.71 oz / 5.54 pounds), Power Supply: 725 g ( = 25.57 oz / 1.6 pounds)
Price
1750 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.1 %
04/2022
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
82.8 %
06/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.2 %
02/2022
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3.1 kg24.3 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.5 %
01/2022
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
80.4 %
06/2021
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg25.2 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.9 %
06/2021
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg30.05 mm17.30"2560x1440

Case – Metal Lid, Plastic Base

Steampunk design?
Steampunk design?
"Physical" notch
"Physical" notch
LED display
LED display

The updated design comes in similar colors to its predecessor. The previously very prominent TUF logo has been removed and replaced with a much smaller protruding imprint in the middle of the metal display lid. The “fake screw” adorned corners remained unchanged.

At the top we find a sort of protruding physical notch housing the camera and microphones that serves as latch for opening the display lid. There is no way to open the laptop with just one hand; both hands are required.

With the display lid closed a small star-like LED panel displays the laptop’s current status, for example whether it is currently charging or whether it has been placed in airplane mode.

Another difference can be found with the display lid open. The base, made of sturdy plastic, is no longer adorned with “stylish” gradients but completely level and thus flat. Accordingly, the keyboard is no longer recessed into the top case.

The fan vents are no longer positioned along the entire width of the device but have gotten much smaller and are now located on the right side.

When it comes to thickness Asus’s official specs of 22.9 mm are deceiving. It may only be that thick at its thinnest point, however more than 50 % of its surface are raised by another 2-3 mm resulting in a real-world thickness closer to 25 mm.

In terms of footprint the new design is slightly narrower than its predecessor by a few millimeters, and it was able to shave off around 200 g (7 oz) of weight.

Most of its (admittedly older) competitors are larger, except for the slightly thinner yet significantly heavier Lenovo Legion.

Size Comparison

395.7 mm / 15.6 inch 260.8 mm / 10.3 inch 30.05 mm / 1.183 inch 2.5 kg5.61 lbs399 mm / 15.7 inch 269 mm / 10.6 inch 26 mm / 1.024 inch 2.7 kg5.84 lbs399 mm / 15.7 inch 290 mm / 11.4 inch 24.3 mm / 0.957 inch 3.1 kg6.76 lbs398 mm / 15.7 inch 273 mm / 10.7 inch 25.2 mm / 0.992 inch 2.7 kg5.99 lbs397 mm / 15.6 inch 284 mm / 11.2 inch 26 mm / 1.024 inch 3 kg6.65 lbs394 mm / 15.5 inch 264 mm / 10.4 inch 25 mm / 0.984 inch 2.5 kg5.54 lbs

Connectivity – Thunderbolt 4; Poor Wi-Fi

The ports have remained largely identical to its predecessor with the notable exception of one USB-A port that has been turned into a USB-C port resulting in a total of two USB-C ports one of which is connected to a Thunderbolt 4 controller.

In addition, all ports were moved slightly forward given that the rear sides are equipped with additional fan vents. Right-handers will be pleased to hear that the right side of the device is only equipped with a single USB port while left-handers are likely to take issue with this positioning. We also found the device’s headphone jack to be too close to the USB-A port. Otherwise, port spacing was okay overall.

Left: Power, LAN, HDMI 2.0b, Thunderbolt 4, USB-C 3.2 Gen 2, USB-A 3.0, audio jack
Left: Power, LAN, HDMI 2.0b, Thunderbolt 4, USB-C 3.2 Gen 2, USB-A 3.0, audio jack
Right: Kensington, USB-A 3.0
Right: Kensington, USB-A 3.0
Rear: Fan vents
Rear: Fan vents

Communication

Wired communications are handled by the CPU’s integrated controller that was first introduced back in 2015. Accordingly, it only supports speeds of up to 1 Gbps. In comparison, many modern network controllers support speeds of 2.5 Gbps and more.

Wireless communications are handled by the very common Intel AX201 adapter. Unfortunately, the F17’s implementation thereof turned out to be particularly slow with transfer speeds only about half as fast as on its competitors. This was already the case on its predecessor, and we are disappointed to see it has not been addressed and improved.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1541 (1418min - 1606max) MBit/s ∼100% +242%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1394 (758min - 1577max) MBit/s ∼90% +210%
MSI GE76 Raider
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1257 (650min - 1337max) MBit/s ∼82% +179%
Average of class Gaming
  (450 - 1603, n=152, last 2 years)
1167 MBit/s ∼76% +159%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=322)
1162 MBit/s ∼75% +158%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
892 (836min - 935max) MBit/s ∼58% +98%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
 
582 (312min - 680max) MBit/s ∼38% +29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
450 (211min - 459max) MBit/s ∼29%
iperf3 receive AX12
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1711 (861min - 1776max) MBit/s ∼100% +304%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1302 (718min - 1672max) MBit/s ∼76% +208%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=322)
1261 MBit/s ∼74% +198%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=152, last 2 years)
1237 MBit/s ∼72% +192%
MSI GE76 Raider
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1137 (588min - 1235max) MBit/s ∼66% +169%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
650 (595min - 706max) MBit/s ∼38% +54%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
 
569 (350min - 709max) MBit/s ∼33% +35%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
423 MBit/s ∼25%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12: Ø422 (403-429)
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (595-706)
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1682 (861-1776)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø441 (211-459)
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø892 (836-935)
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1541 (1418-1606)

Webcam

The F17 is equipped with a common 720p webcam with poor colors and a very poor overall image quality.

ColorChecker
14.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W: 16.32 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 23.26 ∆E

Security

The F17 features a Kensington lock as well as a TPM 2.0. Other security features, such as for example a fingerprint reader, are not available.

Accessories & Warranty

As is common for the F17’s price range there are no additional accessories to be found in the box other than a 240 W power supply.

European customers get a 24 month limited warranty while US customers are once again left to be content with just 12 months.

Warranty set to last until 2024
Warranty set to last until 2024

Maintenance

Three different lengths
Three different lengths

The bottom cover is held in place by 12 easily visible Phillips screws. Unfortunately, they come in three different lengths, so you need to keep track of which screw goes where.

Prying off the bottom cover turned out to be a relatively simple experience. With the cover removed, you have access to the fans, the battery, the SSD, and the RAM. The latter two are protected by a black plastic cover secured by tape, in addition to which the SSD is also covered in some sort of metal foil to improve heat dissipation. A secondary M.2 slot for an additional SSD is available.

Bottom plate removed
Bottom plate removed
2 populated RAM slots
2 populated RAM slots
SSD
SSD
Secondary SSD slot
Secondary SSD slot

The new model looks quite different on the inside compared to the FX706. It is notable for the additional heat pipes, larger speakers, repositioned SSDs and more.

Current model
Current model
Pre-(pre-)decessor
Pre-(pre-)decessor

Input Devices – Small Keys

Keyboard

The keyboard layout remains largely identical, with a numpad that is very narrow for a 17-inch notebook. The cursor keys are still only half the size of regular keys; up/down keys take the space of one regular-sized key.

New are the four extra function keys at the top left ,above the keyboard, used for turning volume up and down, muting, and launching the Armory Crate software. As before the power button is a dedicated and separate entity in the top right corner, and as is common on gaming notebooks the WASD keys have a separate translucent white color that contrasts very sharply with the rest of the keyboard.

The keyboard is backlit with a three-stage RGB backlight that cannot be customized per key but only per zone.

Key travel remains relatively short, with an significant yet somewhat softer feedback than on its predecessor. Overall, the keyboard feels very pleasant to type on with moderate noise emissions.

Current keyboard
Current keyboard
Pre-(pre-)decessor
Pre-(pre-)decessor
Dedicated power button
Dedicated power button
WASD keys
WASD keys

Touchpad

Touchpad
Touchpad

The touchpad no longer features dedicated buttons but is now a bit larger than before (ca. 13 x 7.7 cm / 5.1 x 3 inches). Its surface is pleasantly smooth and only ever so slightly sticky with very slow movements. We also uncovered the presence of a small dead spot in the bottom right corner.

The integrated buttons work fine without any issues and with moderate noise emissions.

Display – Dim and not truly made for gaming

Matte subpixel array
Matte subpixel array
Visible backlight bleeding
Visible backlight bleeding

The only display this Asus ships with is a FHD IPS 144 Hz panel made by AU Optronics.

The panel is well-known and has been out there for quite a while, and given its low brightness of just 268 nits, slow response times of 30-40 ms, and ow color space coverage of 60 % sRGB and around 41 % AdobeRGB, we are used to seeing it be used in the more affordable laptops such as the MSI GF75 Thin.

On the plus side its black level is fairly low due to the low overall brightness, making its contrast ratio comparatively high. Illumination development is decent at 89 %.

And while the panel does not suffer from PWM flickering it does suffer from a minor but still noticeable backlight bleeding along its edges.

59.7 percent sRGB
59.7 percent sRGB
41.5 percent AdobeRGB
41.5 percent AdobeRGB
261
cd/m²
256
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D)
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 287 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 268.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Contrast: 1688:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 5.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.24 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
41.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
AU Optronics AUI8294 (B173HAN04.9), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
LEN173FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GE76 Raider
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display
0%
62%
57%
-1%
67%
Display P3 Coverage
40.2
40.1
0%
64.8
61%
63.1
57%
39.8
-1%
68.1
69%
sRGB Coverage
59.7
60
1%
97.2
63%
94
57%
59.5
0%
98.5
65%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
41.5
41.4
0%
66.7
61%
65.2
57%
41.12
-1%
69.3
67%
Response Times
21%
66%
77%
9%
62%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.2 ?(18.2, 21)
32.4
17%
15 ?(7, 8)
62%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
86%
36.8 ?(17.2, 19.6)
6%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
57%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 ?(15.4, 14.2)
22.4
24%
9 ?(5, 4)
70%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
68%
26 ?(13.6, 12.4)
12%
10 ?(4.8, 5.2)
66%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-5%
21%
24%
-15%
4%
Brightness middle
287
266
-7%
323
13%
290
1%
260
-9%
370
29%
Brightness
268
264
-1%
305
14%
290
8%
251
-6%
333
24%
Brightness Distribution
89
79
-11%
89
0%
96
8%
85
-4%
84
-6%
Black Level *
0.17
0.32
-88%
0.25
-47%
0.23
-35%
0.26
-53%
0.38
-124%
Contrast
1688
831
-51%
1292
-23%
1261
-25%
1000
-41%
974
-42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.1
3.97
22%
1.87
63%
1.59
69%
3.9
24%
2.41
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.72
8.93
-2%
4.84
44%
3.17
64%
20.64
-137%
7.32
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
5.1
3.5
31%
0.92
82%
0.87
83%
3.71
27%
1.19
77%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.24
1.8
58%
2.57
39%
2.5
41%
1.6
62%
3.9
8%
Gamma
2.44 90%
2.31 95%
2.42 91%
2.253 98%
2.068 106%
2.287 96%
CCT
6008 108%
6754 96%
7012 93%
6640 98%
6511 100%
7302 89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
41.4
69
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60
93
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / -1%
50% / 36%
53% / 39%
-2% / -9%
44% / 26%

* ... smaller is better

Calibrating the display panel manually barely improved its image quality. While grayscale accuracy was improved slightly we found no improvements to the color accuracy at all.

Grayscale
Grayscale
Saturation
Saturation
ColorChecker
ColorChecker
Grayscale calibrated
Grayscale calibrated
Saturation calibrated
Saturation calibrated
ColorChecker calibrated
ColorChecker calibrated

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.4 ms rise
↘ 14.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.2 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21805 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Outdoor usability was very limited due to the low brightness. The image is simply too dark to be readable and usable in bright environments.

For an IPS panel we found this AU Optronics panel to offer comparatively poor viewing angles, with noticeable drops in brightness at extreme angles rendering this already dim display even dimmer and less usable.

Performance – Maximum 3D Performance

The combination of Intel Core i7-12700H and Nvidia Geforce RTX 3060 paired with 16 GB of DDR5 RAM should be powerful enough for all tasks and challenges, including modern games which apart from maybe a few exceptions should run perfectly smooth in maximum details in native FHD resolution.

While the processor is identical for all SKUs the GPU is not, and Asus offers a choice between four different GPUs: RTX 3050, RTX 3050 Ti, RTX 3060, and RTX 3070.

 

Test Conditions

In order to achieve the best results possible, we set the performance profile to “Turbo” via the included Armory Crate software.

Given that many options can only be configured using Asus’s own software, users will essentially have no choice but to use it. Keep in mind that some manufacturers use their software to collect user activity data.

Armoury Crate
Armoury Crate

Processor

From 111 W to 45 W during the 1st and 2nd run
From 111 W to 45 W during the 1st and 2nd run
From 79 to 45 W from the 3rd run and beyond
From 79 to 45 W from the 3rd run and beyond

The Intel Core i7-12700H is a member of Intel’s current Alder Lake family and features a total of 14 cores (6 x P-cores, 8 x E-cores) for a total of 20 threads. Its integrated Intel Xe Graphics GPU features 96 EUs and runs at up to 1.4 GHz.

During our 30-minute CineBench loop our i7-12700H started out at a level comparable to the MSI GE76 Raider’s Core i9-12900HK but then quickly dropped to a level more fitting to last gen’s i9-11900H. This becomes very apparent when looking at the CPU’s TDP. During the first two runs the CPU’s power consumption peaks at 111 W for a few seconds before it is reduced to 45 W. Starting with the third iteration the peak is recorded at a much lower 75-80 W which are then reduced very quickly to just 45 W.

In other words: short-term burst performance is around 30 % faster than on its predecessor while long-term sustained performance is not.

On battery, performance dropped from 2,820 (first run) and 1,925 (second run and beyond) to just 1,768 points. This performance decrease is noticeable but still relatively minor.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1955 (1902.5-2820.28)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø1874 (1698.44-2029.22)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
87.5 pt ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
76.4 pt ∼76%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
70.7 pt ∼71%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
64.9 pt ∼65%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
60.4 pt ∼60%
Average of class Gaming
 
60.1 pt ∼60%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
56.7 pt ∼57%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
49.3 pt ∼49%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18288 Points ∼100% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19250, n=30)
16179 Points ∼88% +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
13934 Points ∼76%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 19282, n=173, last 2 years)
12293 Points ∼67% -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
11567 Points ∼63% -17%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
11080 Points ∼61% -20%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
10416 Points ∼57% -25%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
8408 Points ∼46% -40%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1909 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1790 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1825, n=29)
1747 Points ∼92% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
1574 Points ∼82% -12%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1497 Points ∼78% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1920, n=172, last 2 years)
1490 Points ∼78% -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1366 Points ∼72% -24%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1225 Points ∼64% -32%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6849 Points ∼100% +42%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7382, n=29)
6045 Points ∼88% +26%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
4808 Points ∼70%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
4403 Points ∼64% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 7382, n=230, last 2 years)
4402 Points ∼64% -8%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
4214 Points ∼62% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
4059 Points ∼59% -16%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
3244 Points ∼47% -33%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
734 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
689 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 702, n=29)
672 Points ∼92% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
600 Points ∼82% -13%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
579 Points ∼79% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 740, n=230, last 2 years)
553 Points ∼75% -20%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
535 Points ∼73% -22%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
476 Points ∼65% -31%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2909 (2660.99min - 2908.88max) Points ∼100% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
2820 (1902.5min - 2820.28max) Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2903, n=31)
2545 Points ∼87% -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
2029 Points ∼70% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3077, n=239, last 2 years)
1857 Points ∼64% -34%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1823 (1645.14min - 1822.57max) Points ∼63% -35%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1723 Points ∼59% -39%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1382 Points ∼48% -51%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
275 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=29)
252 Points ∼92% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points ∼88% -6%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Points ∼82% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
223 Points ∼81% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 277, n=229, last 2 years)
221 Points ∼80% -14%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
196 Points ∼71% -24%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
326 Seconds * ∼100% -32%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
299.7 Seconds * ∼92% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (168 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)
296 Seconds * ∼91% -20%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
284 Seconds * ∼87% -15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
247 Seconds * ∼76%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
242 Seconds * ∼74% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (171 - 732, n=28)
227 Seconds * ∼70% +8%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
181 Seconds * ∼56% +27%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
72836 MIPS ∼100% +32%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=28)
61274 MIPS ∼84% +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
55010 MIPS ∼76%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
50441 MIPS ∼69% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 83533, n=229, last 2 years)
49801 MIPS ∼68% -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
45428 MIPS ∼62% -17%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
45311 MIPS ∼62% -18%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
40876 MIPS ∼56% -26%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6144 MIPS ∼100% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
5870 MIPS ∼96% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
5588 MIPS ∼91%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5863, n=28)
5571 MIPS ∼91% 0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
5511 MIPS ∼90% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=229, last 2 years)
5409 MIPS ∼88% -3%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
5393 MIPS ∼88% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
5369 MIPS ∼87% -4%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13648 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
12661 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=29)
11733 Points ∼86% -7%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
8470 Points ∼62% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 14294, n=222, last 2 years)
8421 Points ∼62% -33%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
7725 Points ∼57% -39%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
6688 Points ∼49% -47%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
6641 Points ∼49% -48%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1918 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1756 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=29)
1723 Points ∼90% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
1576 Points ∼82% -10%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1568 Points ∼82% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1933, n=222, last 2 years)
1448 Points ∼75% -18%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1417 Points ∼74% -19%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
1264 Points ∼66% -28%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
19.9 fps ∼100% +41%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.4, n=30)
17.1 fps ∼86% +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
14.9 fps ∼75% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.1 fps ∼71%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 22.5, n=231, last 2 years)
13.9 fps ∼70% -1%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.3 fps ∼67% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
13.2 fps ∼66% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
11.1 fps ∼56% -21%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
86.1 s * ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
56.1 s * ∼65% +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)
53.4 s * ∼62% +38%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
53.3 s * ∼62% +38%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
49.2 s * ∼57% +43%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
45.8 s * ∼53% +47%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 92, n=28)
45.7 s * ∼53% +47%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
38.9 s * ∼45% +55%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.577 sec * ∼100% -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=227, last 2 years)
0.565 sec * ∼98% -22%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.559 sec * ∼97% -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
0.533 sec * ∼92% -16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.529 sec * ∼92% -15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.448 - 1.052, n=28)
0.4796 sec * ∼83% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4614 sec * ∼80%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4252 sec * ∼74% +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2820 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
257 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
194 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
Performance Rating
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86.1 pt ∼86%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84.5 pt ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
 
81.1 pt ∼81%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
75.5 pt ∼76%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66.7 pt ∼67%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
65.1 pt ∼65%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM -9!
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 pt ∼0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 pt ∼0%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
12636 KRay/s ∼100% +86%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 19199, n=184, last 2 years)
11310 KRay/s ∼90% +66%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
10072 KRay/s ∼80% +48%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9065 KRay/s ∼72% +33%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 9576, n=28)
8067 KRay/s ∼64% +19%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6797 KRay/s ∼54%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78250 Points ∼100% +142%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=184, last 2 years)
61343 Points ∼78% +89%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52336 Points ∼67% +62%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40570 Points ∼52% +25%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 41744, n=28)
37079 Points ∼47% +15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32381 Points ∼41%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3178 MB/s ∼100% +36%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 3442, n=28)
2854 MB/s ∼90% +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 4851, n=184, last 2 years)
2839 MB/s ∼89% +22%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2675 MB/s ∼84% +15%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2543 MB/s ∼80% +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2331 MB/s ∼73%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106414 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99296 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 99917, n=28)
96767 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 132615, n=184, last 2 years)
89292 Points ∼84% -10%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
76986 Points ∼72% -22%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
72108 Points ∼68% -27%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10237 Points ∼100% +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=184, last 2 years)
9886 Points ∼97% +19%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9157 Points ∼89% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9928, n=28)
9130 Points ∼89% +10%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8862 Points ∼87% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8317 Points ∼81%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
43274 Points ∼100% +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=184, last 2 years)
33417 Points ∼77% +77%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
25823 Points ∼60% +37%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
24693 Points ∼57% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 27390, n=28)
22329 Points ∼52% +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
18863 Points ∼44%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
100062 MB/s ∼100% +102%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
98939 MB/s ∼99% +100%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 166300, n=184, last 2 years)
76982 MB/s ∼77% +56%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 102398, n=28)
76649 MB/s ∼77% +55%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49493 MB/s ∼49%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
34383 MB/s ∼34% -31%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1085 MB/s ∼100% +38%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=28)
989 MB/s ∼91% +26%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
787 MB/s ∼73%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1209, n=205, last 2 years)
691 MB/s ∼64% -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
649 MB/s ∼60% -18%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
609 MB/s ∼56% -23%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s ∼0% -100%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s ∼0% -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6505 KRay/s ∼100% +66%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 10472, n=184, last 2 years)
6135 KRay/s ∼94% +57%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
5481 KRay/s ∼84% +40%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5239 KRay/s ∼81% +34%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 5760, n=28)
4683 KRay/s ∼72% +20%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3917 KRay/s ∼60%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40000 MPixel/s ∼100% +22%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 46643, n=28)
32978 MPixel/s ∼82% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32915 MPixel/s ∼82%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 46643, n=184, last 2 years)
24619 MPixel/s ∼62% -25%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
20568 MPixel/s ∼51% -38%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
16101 MPixel/s ∼40% -51%

System Performance

In PCMark 10 the F17 performed much worse than we would have expected at 6-15 % below average for comparable systems. It is able to outperform its own predecessor only in the Digital Content Creation but performs much slower overall. We were able to reproduce these results by running the test a second time.

Subjectively speaking the system performed very smoothly and without any noticeable hiccups.

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8007 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (5986 - 7531, n=5)
7082 Points ∼88% +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6901 Points ∼86% +15%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
6615 Points ∼83% +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8186, n=190, last 2 years)
6545 Points ∼82% +9%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
6505 Points ∼81% +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5986 Points ∼75%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5685 Points ∼71% -5%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10688 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10602 Points ∼99% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (9289 - 11053, n=5)
10380 Points ∼97% +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=189, last 2 years)
9859 Points ∼92% +6%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
9695 Points ∼91% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
9639 Points ∼90% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9289 Points ∼87%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9182 Points ∼86% -1%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10100 Points ∼100% +64%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9071 Points ∼90% +47%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
9027 Points ∼89% +47%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8874 Points ∼88% +44%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10638, n=189, last 2 years)
8737 Points ∼87% +42%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6161 - 9602, n=5)
8715 Points ∼86% +41%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7217 Points ∼71% +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6161 Points ∼61%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12905 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (10118 - 11672, n=5)
10721 Points ∼83% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10175 Points ∼79%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9274 Points ∼72% -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
9026 Points ∼70% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13098, n=189, last 2 years)
8955 Points ∼69% -12%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8684 Points ∼67% -15%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7526 Points ∼58% -26%
CrossMark / Overall
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1649 - 1910, n=3)
1814 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2108, n=32, last 2 years)
1741 Points ∼96% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1649 Points ∼91%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1337 Points ∼74% -19%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1536 - 1797, n=3)
1697 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=32, last 2 years)
1692 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1536 Points ∼91%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1370 Points ∼81% -11%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1963 - 2084, n=3)
2040 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1963 Points ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2165, n=32, last 2 years)
1823 Points ∼89% -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1372 Points ∼67% -30%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=32, last 2 years)
1671 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (1210 - 1798, n=3)
1571 Points ∼94% +30%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1210 Points ∼72%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1148 Points ∼69% -5%
PCMark 10 Score
5986 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62554 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31252 - 77803, n=28)
55319 MB/s ∼88% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52925 MB/s ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=184, last 2 years)
43187 MB/s ∼69% -18%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
38867 MB/s ∼62% -27%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36548 MB/s ∼58% -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65452 MB/s ∼100% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62745 MB/s ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (32677 - 76185, n=28)
58768 MB/s ∼90% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=184, last 2 years)
46944 MB/s ∼72% -25%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
44282 MB/s ∼68% -29%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
40016 MB/s ∼61% -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64282 MB/s ∼100% +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
57728 MB/s ∼90%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (30592 - 66475, n=28)
55276 MB/s ∼86% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 66256, n=184, last 2 years)
45040 MB/s ∼70% -22%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
40678 MB/s ∼63% -30%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36998 MB/s ∼58% -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.6 ns * ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
78.5 ns * ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (0 - 122, n=208, last 2 years)
60.3 ns * ∼65%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0 - 122, n=29)
58.7 ns * ∼63%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
56.6 ns * ∼61%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies

Unfortunately, we found significant DPC latencies when launching the Edge browser already. On a positive note, these did not get any worse from that point on regardless of what test we ran. This means that our 4K/60 FPS YouTube video test did not run very well, with a total of 14 dropped frames. Our main suspect for this behavior is the NT kernel driver.

YouTube test video
YouTube test video
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Drivers
LatencyMon Drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4527 μs * ∼100% -95%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2319 μs * ∼51%
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1642 μs * ∼36% +29%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1564 μs * ∼35% +33%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1399 μs * ∼31% +40%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
743 μs * ∼16% +68%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Our review unit was equipped with a 1 TB SK Hynix PCIe 3 SSD, which can be found on 44th place in our SSD/HDD top list. The same SSD was already installed in the F17’s predecessor. It performs well overall but is incapable of keeping up with the Samsung SSDs found in the XMG Core or MSI Raider.

Sustained read performance turned out to be rather inconsistent and fluctuated after a short while. This may be one of the reasons for its overall below average PCMark performance.

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3364 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3042 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 514 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 445.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 25.64 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.9 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1665 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2024 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
94.7 pt ∼95%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
61.8 pt ∼62%
Average of class Gaming
 
59.4 pt ∼59%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
56.3 pt ∼56%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
55.8 pt ∼56%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
 
54.3 pt ∼54%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
43.9 pt ∼44%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
25.5 pt ∼26%
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2529 (2450.31min - 2528.54max) MB/s ∼100% +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (170 - 5544, n=186, last 2 years)
2377 MB/s ∼94% +34%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2183 (2113.09min - 2182.51max) MB/s ∼86% +23%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2144 (2055.42min - 2144.01max) MB/s ∼85% +20%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1780 - 2383, n=18)
2071 MB/s ∼82% +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1956 (1938.61min - 1956.43max) MB/s ∼77% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s ∼70%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s ∼70% 0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1061 (106.95min - 1061.13max) MB/s ∼42% -40%
seq write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3923 (3818.83min - 3922.64max) MB/s ∼100% +48%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s ∼67%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s ∼67% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (174 - 7889, n=185, last 2 years)
2584 MB/s ∼66% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2425 (2355.41min - 2424.54max) MB/s ∼62% -8%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1886 - 2909, n=18)
2343 MB/s ∼60% -11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2095 (2074.34min - 2094.85max) MB/s ∼53% -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1604 (1586.29min - 1604.11max) MB/s ∼41% -39%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
978 (971.82min - 978.46max) MB/s ∼25% -63%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6722 (5765.49min - 6722max) MB/s ∼100% +91%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 13195, n=186, last 2 years)
3929 MB/s ∼58% +12%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (3515 - 3607, n=18)
3565 MB/s ∼53% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3542 (3289.1min - 3542.3max) MB/s ∼53% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s ∼52%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s ∼52% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3468 (3143.21min - 3467.64max) MB/s ∼52% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
2646 (2421.6min - 2645.77max) MB/s ∼39% -25%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1985 (1757.88min - 1984.76max) MB/s ∼30% -44%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4999 (4978.75min - 4998.98max) MB/s ∼100% +66%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3302 (3294.84min - 3301.55max) MB/s ∼66% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 10203, n=186, last 2 years)
3110 MB/s ∼62% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3091 (2656.88min - 3090.57max) MB/s ∼62% +3%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (2869 - 3098, n=18)
3014 MB/s ∼60% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s ∼60%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s ∼60% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1597 (1579.16min - 1597.4max) MB/s ∼32% -47%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
979 (974.28min - 979.37max) MB/s ∼20% -67%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
89.8 (89.42min - 89.75max) MB/s ∼100% +175%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
68.6 (68.41min - 68.6max) MB/s ∼76% +110%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (32.6 - 70.5, n=18)
56.9 MB/s ∼63% +75%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.53 - 97.4, n=186, last 2 years)
56.1 MB/s ∼62% +72%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
47.4 (47.27min - 47.41max) MB/s ∼53% +45%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
47.3 (42.61min - 47.31max) MB/s ∼53% +45%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s ∼36%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s ∼36% 0%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
32.4 (32.28min - 32.44max) MB/s ∼36% -1%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
275 (273.95min - 275.11max) MB/s ∼100% +27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s ∼79%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s ∼79% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
173 (172.14min - 172.83max) MB/s ∼63% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.79 - 421, n=185, last 2 years)
171.3 MB/s ∼62% -21%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (81.2 - 216, n=18)
153.8 MB/s ∼56% -29%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
144 (143.24min - 143.97max) MB/s ∼52% -33%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
136 (136.06min - 136.26max) MB/s ∼49% -37%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
112 (108.3min - 111.94max) MB/s ∼41% -48%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4073 (4064.94min - 4073.47max) MB/s ∼100% +84%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s ∼54%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s ∼54% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
1888 (1886.26min - 1887.59max) MB/s ∼46% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.1 - 4198, n=185, last 2 years)
1779 MB/s ∼44% -20%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (628 - 2217, n=18)
1337 MB/s ∼33% -40%
Lenovo Legion 5 17ACH6H-82JY0003GE
Samsung PM991a MZALQ512HBLU
1079 (1063.35min - 1079.33max) MB/s ∼26% -51%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
751 (741.76min - 751.2max) MB/s ∼18% -66%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
310 (293.77min - 309.72max) MB/s ∼8% -86%
4k q32 t16 write
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
2668 (2644.15min - 2667.88max) MB/s ∼100% +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2307 (2258.85min - 2307.29max) MB/s ∼86%