Notebookcheck Logo

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N

HFM001TD3JX013N

The SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N is a fasts PCIe SSD in M.2 2280 form factor. It was first seen in the Asus G15 gaming laptop and achieved a very good performance in it.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced01.02.2021

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
25.9 pt (32%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.772 -97%
...
Derlar FP3 NVMe M.2 SSD PCIe Gen 3.0X4 1 TB
25.4 -2%
ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB
25.7 -1%
Kston K765-1TB
25.7 -1%
Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ
25.8 0%
Lexar 1024GB LNM6A1X001T-HNNNG
25.8 0%
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
25.8 0%
ADATA XPG Gammix S50 1TB
25.8 0%
SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X113N
25.9 0%
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
25.9 0%
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
25.9
Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPETJ1T24MGE2QDQ
26 0%
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB
26 0%
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
26.1 1%
Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ
26.2 1%
SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X112N
26.2 1%
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK1T0QFM
26.2 1%
Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G
26.2 1%
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4
26.3 2%
Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ
26.4 2%
...
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB
81.6 215%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 858     avg: 1349     median: 1338.5 (22%)     max: 1855 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 372.8     avg: 665     median: 712 (26%)     max: 964 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 1277     avg: 1908     median: 1943.6 (18%)     max: 2649 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 3615     avg: 4797     median: 4943 (36%)     max: 6117 Points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 1638     avg: 2258     median: 2393 (33%)     max: 2660 Points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1221     avg: 1706     median: 1675 (35%)     max: 2291 Points
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.028     avg: 0.1     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.109 ms
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.028     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.093 ms
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 1342     avg: 1939     median: 2069 (35%)     max: 2216 MB/s
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 872.52     avg: 1369     median: 1334 (37%)     max: 1923 MB/s
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 59     avg: 127.3     median: 129.7 (25%)     max: 184.8 MB/s
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 28.83     avg: 53     median: 55.2 (18%)     max: 66.9 MB/s
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 1243     avg: 1917     median: 1619 (14%)     max: 2969 MB/s
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 2635     avg: 2839     median: 2881 (23%)     max: 3133 MB/s
+ 15 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Write
507 MB/s (50%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Read
387.9 MB/s (30%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Write
151 MB/s (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Read
62.9 MB/s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Write
1768 MB/s (33%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Read
1440 MB/s (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Write
2286 MB/s (38%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Read
2065 MB/s (40%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 115.9     avg: 155.8     median: 151.6 (14%)     max: 217.7 MB/s
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 25.64     avg: 57     median: 57.9 (2%)     max: 73.2 MB/s
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 1916     avg: 3943     median: 2305 (12%)     max: 18545 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 1991     avg: 2180     median: 2152.5 (26%)     max: 2492 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 381.6     avg: 452     median: 445.3 (15%)     max: 525 MB/s
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 346     avg: 446.8     median: 452.1 (7%)     max: 524 MB/s
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 1390     avg: 2859     median: 2998 (20%)     max: 3166 MB/s
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 3219     avg: 3515     median: 3552 (19%)     max: 3607 MB/s
+ 13 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
min: 484.5     avg: 791     median: 508 (10%)     max: 1665 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
min: 1276     avg: 1649     median: 1647 (25%)     max: 2024 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark 8 - PCMark 8 Storage v2
5018 Points (98%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 81.2     avg: 153.8     median: 151.5 (35%)     max: 216 MB/s
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 32.6     avg: 56.9     median: 61.3 (18%)     max: 70.5 MB/s
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 394     avg: 883     median: 505.5 (10%)     max: 2341 MB/s
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 628     avg: 1337     median: 1354.5 (22%)     max: 2217 MB/s
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 1886     avg: 2343     median: 2301 (25%)     max: 2909 MB/s
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 1780     avg: 2071     median: 2043.5 (29%)     max: 2383 MB/s
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 2869     avg: 3014     median: 3010 (21%)     max: 3098 MB/s
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 3515     avg: 3565     median: 3558.5 (22%)     max: 3607 MB/s
+ 18 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 2315     avg: 3253     median: 3510 (22%)     max: 3592 MB/s
+ 17 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
010020030040050060070080090010001100120013001400150016001700180019002000210022002300240025002600270028002900300031003200330034003500Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.29
log 24. 00:50:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Mar 2025 16:16:36 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3619 +0.021s ... 0.027s

#7 got single benchmarks 3619 +0.04s ... 0.067s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.225s ... 1.291s

#10 return log +0.001s ... 1.292s

Notebook reviews with SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N

Intel Arc A370M debut: Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD 2-in-1 review

Intel Arc A370M debut: Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD 2-in-1 review

The Zenbook Flip 15 is back with 12th gen Intel Core H CPUs and the new Intel Arc A370M GPU to replace last year's Core U options and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q...
Intel Core i7-12700H | Intel Arc A370M | 15.60" | 1.8 kg
Asus TUF Gaming F17 Laptop Review: Good 3D Performance and Battery Life Meets Poor Build Quality and Dim Display

Asus TUF Gaming F17 Laptop Review: Good 3D Performance and Battery Life Meets Poor Build Quality and Dim Display

After two years Asus finally updates the series' case and adds an Alder Lake CPU with DDR5 RAM and RTX GPU, in our case an RTX 3060 with a full 140 W TGP. And w...
Intel Core i7-12700H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 2.5 kg
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM laptop review: Peak GeForce RTX 3060 performance

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM laptop review: Peak GeForce RTX 3060 performance

Aside from the obvious CPU update to 12th gen Alder Lake-H, the FX507 carries significant changes over last year's FX506 both inside and out. Performance hunter...
Intel Core i7-12700H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 2.1 kg
LG Gram 15 (2021)

Review of the LG Gram 15Z90P: 1.1-kg (~2.4-lb) 15-inch laptop

After seeing the 14-, 16- and 17-inch LG Grams, we were almost surprised to see the 15-inch model. The weight is the main feature here as well: 1.1 kg (~2.4 lb)...
Intel Core i7-1165G7 | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | 15.60" | 1.1 kg
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X pre-production unit review: Performance, endurance and mighty OLED display

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X pre-production unit review: Performance, endurance and mighty OLED display

A 400 cd/m² bright OLED display as well as strong hardware from Nvidia and AMD make the 16-inch Vivobook an attractive laptop together with the valuable aluminu...
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 16.10" | 1.9 kg

Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E: Intel Core i7-1165G7 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Asus Zenbook 14X OLED pre-production unit review: That's some punchy colors!

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » Asus TUF Gaming A15 with Ryzen 7 in review: Entry-level gaming laptop with AMD CPU

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM Laptop Review: AMD Still Rules The 14-inch Gaming Space

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM: Intel Core i9-11900H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » Asus TUF Gaming F17 laptop review: Good gaming device with RTX 3060 but average display despite 144 Hz

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM: Intel Core i7-11800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Laptop Review: No Extras, Just Performance

Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA: Intel Core i7-1165G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  Review » Asus ZenBook 13 laptop review: Core i7-1165G7 versus Ryzen 7 5800U. Which one is the better ZenBook?

Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S: AMD Ryzen 7 5800U AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), 13.30", 1.2 kg
  Review » Asus ZenBook 13 Review - A compact 13-inch laptop with a fast Ryzen 7 5800U and OLED display

Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  Review » Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR laptop review: AMD and Nvidia combined

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR: Intel Core i7-11370H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » Asus TUF Dash F15 Laptop: Ampere with one foot on the brake

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 laptop review: Eye-catcher

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM: Intel Core i7-12700H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 16.10", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM: Intel Core i7-11800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM: Intel Core i9-11900H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM

Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E: Intel Core i7-1165G7 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E

Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA: AMD Ryzen 7 5700U AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), 13.30", 1.1 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA

Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA: Intel Core i7-1165G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA

Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S: AMD Ryzen 7 5800U AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), 13.30", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Asus ZenBook 13 UM325S

Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR: Intel Core i7-11370H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q

Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD: Intel Core i7-12700H Intel Arc A370M, 15.60", 1.8 kg
   » Asus Zenbook Flip 15 Q539ZD OLED display is 40 percent dimmer than what the manufacturer is advertising

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM: Intel Core i7-12700H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.1 kg
   » That awkward moment when a GeForce RTX 3060 laptop can outperform some GeForce RTX 3070 laptops

Asus Zenbook 14X UX5400E: Intel Core i7-1165G7 NVIDIA GeForce MX450, 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Asus Zenbook 14X OLED: Vibrant display, weak long-term performance

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
   » Asus TUF Gaming A15: Budget gaming laptop with AMD processor

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » Specs on specs: the ultimate Asus Zephyrus G14 vs. Razer Blade 14 comparison table

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM: Intel Core i9-11900H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 2.7 kg
   » Asus TUF Gaming F17 laptop reviewed: Tiger Lake and RTX 3060 in new case

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM: Intel Core i7-11800H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.3 kg
   » Tiger Lake-H has put Intel back on track in its fight against AMD's Zen series

Asus ZenBook 13 UX325EA: Intel Core i7-1165G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 13.30", 1.2 kg
   » ZenBook 13 in review: Is it better to go with Ryzen or with Intel Core? There are good arguments for both.

Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q: AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
   » Sexy Beast: Asus ROG Zephyrus G15

Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR: Intel Core i7-11370H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
   » Falling short: Asus TUF Dash F15

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-02- 1)