Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X pre-production unit review: Performance, endurance and mighty OLED display

Large laptop with filigree details A 400 cd/m² bright OLED display as well as strong hardware from Nvidia and AMD make the 16-inch Vivobook an attractive laptop together with the valuable aluminum casing. However, the tested pre-production device could only almost show a production-ready performance in the test.
Marc Herter, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

With a very good OLED display, Harman Kardon sound, and a lot of computing power, the Asus Vivobook Pro 16x should primarily appeal to media designers and content creators. A Microsoft Surface Dial integrated into the touchpad underlines this aspect. The laptop, which we were allowed to test as a pre-production device, shows a well-thought-out design and high performance readiness. The dark aluminum case looks both stable and elegant.

At the heart of the multimedia laptop is the fast AMD Ryzen R9-5900HX together with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti. Thus, the laptop has enough graphics performance for many games and video editing programs.

The competition for the Asus Vivobook Pro comes from all areas of our database, because the laptop is very powerful for a multimedia notebook. Thus, the Vivobook Pro can also keep up with the entry-level class of current gaming laptops and some workstations.

As a further preview of the latest Asus devices, the Review of the Asus Zenbook 14X is available.

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4096 MB, Memory: 5500 MHz, 50 W TDP, yes
Memory
32768 MB 
, soldered
Display
16.10 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 281 PPI, Samsung ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Soundcard
AMD Raven/Renoir/VanGogh/Cezanne - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Multi Headset, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 358 x 258 ( = 0.75 x 14.09 x 10.16 in)
Battery
96 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0.9 MP
Additional features
Keyboard: Inseltastatur, Keyboard Light: yes
Weight
1.911 kg ( = 67.41 oz / 4.21 pounds), Power Supply: 460 g ( = 16.23 oz / 1.01 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
12/2021
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg19 mm16.10"3840x2400
87.3 %
08/2021
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2160
86.5 %
10/2021
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
R7 5800H, Vega 8 R5000
2 kg17.8 mm16.00"2520x1680
85.6 %
03/2021
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg20 mm15.60"3840x2160
86 %
08/2021
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
i5-11300H, GeForce MX450
1.9 kg18.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
08/2021
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160

Case - anodized aluminum and little plastic

A lot of dark gray to black anodized aluminum with a few accents of black plastic determine the exterior of the Asus Vivobook. Although the laptop is not really thin, the device looks less bulky thanks to a Swiss edge. Small design elements, such as embossments on the display hinge, also liven things up.

The matte aluminum with its smooth surface is always pleasantly cool to the touch. Except for the somewhat flexible display, the laptop looks very stable and hardly shows any manufacturing problems. The somewhat uneven gaps on the underside are not untypical for a pre-production device.

The display can be opened up to an angle of 160° with one hand. A keyboard with gray and red color accents as well as the large touchpad can be seen underneath.

The Asus Vivobook is relatively slim for a 16-inch laptop of the given performance class. Weight and thickness are in the same range as the competition.

Size comparison

358 mm / 14.1 inch 258 mm / 10.2 inch 19 mm / 0.748 inch 1.9 kg4.21 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 250 mm / 9.84 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2.2 kg4.92 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 251 mm / 9.88 inch 18.4 mm / 0.724 inch 1.9 kg4.19 lbs354 mm / 13.9 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 1.9 kg4.29 lbs351 mm / 13.8 inch 254.9 mm / 10 inch 17.8 mm / 0.701 inch 2 kg4.39 lbs345 mm / 13.6 inch 230 mm / 9.06 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 1.9 kg4.27 lbs

Equipment - without Thunderbolt, the Vivobook offers little connectivity

The notebook does not offer many connectivity options with its four USB ports (one of them USB Type-C). PowerDelivery and Thunderbolt 4 are not available here. The HDMI port is the only option for connecting an external display via cable.

3.5 mm headset, microSD, USB Type C 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI, USB Type A 3.2 Gen 2, power supply
3.5 mm headset, microSD, USB Type C 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI, USB Type A 3.2 Gen 2, power supply
2 x USB Type A 3.2 Gen 2
2 x USB Type A 3.2 Gen 2

SDCardreader

The microSD card reader is quite slow with a transfer rate of 38 MB/s. The AV PRO microSD with 128 GB used in the test usually delivers much faster data transfer rates.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
224 MB/s ∼100% +502%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s ∼87% +422%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.1 - 226, n=59, last 2 years)
80 MB/s ∼36% +115%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
73.8 MB/s ∼33% +98%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
37.2 MB/s ∼17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
213 MB/s ∼100% +461%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
202.8 MB/s ∼95% +434%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
90.6 MB/s ∼43% +138%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
88.6 MB/s ∼42% +133%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.2 - 217, n=58, last 2 years)
86.4 MB/s ∼41% +127%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
  (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
38 MB/s ∼18%

Communication

An Intel AX200 module is responsible for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 in the Asus Vivobook. However, the otherwise very fast WLAN module is below its potential in the test device's transmission speeds. Positioning the antenna is often particularly difficult in laptops with a metal casing.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1419 (1169min - 1609max) MBit/s ∼100% +55%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1367 (960min - 1479max) MBit/s ∼96% +49%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=127)
1104 MBit/s ∼78% +21%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1090 MBit/s ∼77% +19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (277 - 1497, n=81, last 2 years)
1035 MBit/s ∼73% +13%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
915 (458min - 960max) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1363 (1311min - 1453max) MBit/s ∼100% +110%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1339 (1289min - 1364max) MBit/s ∼98% +106%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1684, n=128)
1191 MBit/s ∼87% +84%
Average of class Multimedia
  (137 - 1684, n=81, last 2 years)
1138 MBit/s ∼83% +75%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1080 MBit/s ∼79% +66%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
649 (613min - 666max) MBit/s ∼48%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø649 (613-666)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø899 (458-960)

Webcam

The 0.9 MP webcam of the all-round laptop shows a typical image quality for laptops. A mechanical shutter protects against unwanted glances through the camera here. The microphone and webcam can also be disabled via a function key on the keyboard. Small orange LEDs indicate the state of both.

ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
25 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
21 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE: 20.01 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 26.41 ∆E

Security

The Asus Vivobook has up-to-date security features like SecureBoot and TPM 2.0 thanks to the AMD Ryzen R9. Windows Update reports full compatibility with Windows 11.

A fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button can be used as an authentication method for logging in.

Accessories

Apart from an appropriate power supply unit, our pre-production device did not come with any other accessories.

Maintenance

After removing the 11 TX5 screws, the lower casing cover can be removed with a suction cup. The WLAN module and the M.2-2280 SSD can be replaced. The two fans can also be easily cleaned in the process. The working memory, on the other hand, is soldered.

Warranty

Our pre-production device is excluded from any warranty. Normally, Asus offers devices with a warranty of 24 months.

Input devices - The Asus Dial delivers features for creatives

Keyboard

The full keyboard of the Asus Vivobook has a normal size with its 16 mm keys. It is easy to work with a pleasantly high typing resistance and a noticeable haptic feedback. The keyboard is quiet and easy to use even in the dark thanks to the backlight. Function keys for turning the microphone and camera on and off as well as for the screenshot menu and the MyAsus app round out the keyboard's functionality.

Touchpad

The 13 × 8.5 cm (5.1 x 3.4 in) ClickPad convinces with its responsiveness and smooth surface. An additional control element can be accessed with a swipe from the upper right corner. The Asus Dial allows controlling screen brightness, volume and other settings as well as launching applications. The Asus Dial can also be used in some Adobe programs. Alternatively, the Asus Dial can also be configured like the Microsoft Surface Dial.

Display - WQUXGA and OLED at 60 Hz result in a very good picture

Pixel grid of the OLED panel
Pixel grid of the OLED panel

With 400 cd/m², the OLED display in Asus' Vivobook delivers a very bright and colorful picture with 3840 × 2400 pixels in a 16:10 format. Calculated to the 16.1-inch size, this results in a pixel density of 281 ppi. Individual pixels are thus difficult to recognize. The maximum frame rate of 60 FPS might be too low for the intended use as a laptop for media designers. There are no halos or poorly illuminated areas on the OLED screen. The measurements also reveal a very good illumination.

396
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung ATNA60YV02-0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 402 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 396 cd/m² Minimum: 5.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 392 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 1.85
ΔE Greyscale 1.77 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
96.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
Samsung ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.10
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
SDC4145, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
BOE TV160DKT-NH0, , 2520x1680, 16.00
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
Display
-1%
-25%
1%
-17%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
99.8
99.9
0%
63.1
-37%
99.9
0%
74
-26%
99.9
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
94.9
-5%
100
0%
98.7
-1%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
96.9
95.3
-2%
65.1
-33%
98.5
2%
74.5
-23%
98.1
1%
Response Times
87%
-1590%
97%
-425%
-40%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
2.4 ?(1, 1.4)
-20%
41.2 ?(19.2, 22)
-1960%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
-20%
13 ?(6, 7)
-550%
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
-80%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3)
-20%
26.4 ?(14, 12.4)
-1220%
1.8 ?(1, 0.8)
10%
8 ?(4, 4)
-300%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
-40%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(80)
240.4 ?(52)
301%
240 ?(79)
300%
59.5 ?(99)
-1%
Screen
-67%
-1%
-26%
-30%
-11%
Brightness middle
392
379.6
-3%
357
-9%
442
13%
356
-9%
362
-8%
Brightness
396
380
-4%
349
-12%
452
14%
322
-19%
367
-7%
Brightness Distribution
98
95
-3%
93
-5%
95
-3%
80
-18%
97
-1%
Black Level *
0.21
0.05
0.27
0.06
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.74
5.15
-196%
1.6
8%
2.69
-55%
2.4
-38%
2.1
-21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.18
7.79
-145%
3.9
-23%
8.27
-160%
4.42
-39%
4.1
-29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.85
3.1
-68%
0.6
68%
2.59
-40%
2.5
-35%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.77
2.6
-47%
2.4
-36%
0.9
49%
2.81
-59%
1.4
21%
Gamma
2.22 99%
1.99 111%
2.14 103%
2.172 101%
2.4 92%
2.18 101%
CCT
6483 100%
6166 105%
6728 97%
6434 101%
6294 103%
6608 98%
Contrast
1700
8840
1319
6033
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
99
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / -16%
-539% / -272%
24% / 8%
-157% / -98%
-17% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

The infinite contrast ratio of OLED displays never fails to impress. At the same time, Adobe, P3 and sRGB color spaces are covered by almost 100%. With an average color deviation of only ΔΕ1.74 ex-factory, the display is very well calibrated. The color profile we created can only improve the representation of the grayscale, but the color reproduction deteriorates slightly in the process.

Calman colors
Calman colors
Calman colors calibrated
Calman colors calibrated
Calman grayscale
Calman grayscale
Calman grayscale calibrated
Calman grayscale calibrated
Calman saturation
Calman saturation
Calman saturation calibrated
Calman saturation calibrated
Asus Vivobook vs. sRGB color space
Asus Vivobook vs. sRGB color space
Asus Vivobook vs. Adobe color space
Asus Vivobook vs. Adobe color space
Asus Vivobook vs. DisplayP3
Asus Vivobook vs. DisplayP3
 
 
 

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

The flickering found in the test is due to the display technology used. In OLED displays, the image is typically updated line by line. In the process, a narrow area of the image is briefly turned off. Depending on the brightness setting, more or wider stripes also go dark. However, flickering is somewhat easier on the eyes than PWM-controlled backlighting because the entire display does not go dark in the process.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz ≤ 80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21941 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Typical for OLED displays, the screen of the Asus Vivobook is easy to read from all directions. However, slight rainbow effects occur at acute viewing angles. The glossy display surface makes outdoor use with the notebook difficult despite the high display brightness. Reflections and refractions make reading the display impossible at the wrong viewing angle.

Outdoor use Asus Vivobook Pro
Outdoor use Asus Vivobook Pro
Outdoor use Asus Vivobook Pro
Outdoor use Asus Vivobook Pro
Viewing angle assembly Asus Vivobook Pro
Viewing angle assembly Asus Vivobook Pro
 

Software - MyAsus keeps asking for registration

Two programs are preinstalled on the Asus Vivobook, which can be used to set settings for various hardware components. In the ProArt Creator Hub, you can primarily adjust the color reproduction, the function of the Asus Dial and the performance control.

The MyAsus app, which can also be accessed via one of the function keys, offers a lot of settings. There, settings for the screen, the speakers, battery, the power control and much more can be set. However, the app always requires a log-in with an Asus account or a link via Facebook or Google. Therefore, we did not use the MyAsus app in the rest of the test.

Performance - The Ryzen R9 on 54 watts is convincing

With AMD Ryzen R9-5900HX, 32 GB DDR5 RAM and the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti, the motherboard of our test device is well equipped. A 1 TB NVMe SSD is available as main storage. Other configurations with Ryzen R5 and R7 as well as with 8 and 16 GB of working memory are also known, but not yet confirmed.

Test conditions

The tested Asus Vivobook Pro is a pre-production model. Not all drivers are fully developed yet. During the test period, individual drivers were updated again and again. Asus only provided a functioning performance control for our test device shortly before the end of the test period via an update of the ProArt Creator Hub. The benchmarks were thus all repeated with the Full Speed Mode setting.

Thus, 4 different options are available for the performance control. In the selected mode, the fans permanently rotate at full speed. This setting is particularly suitable for stable performance during longer load phases.

HWinfo
HWinfo
GPU-Z AMD iGPU
GPU-Z AMD iGPU
GPU-Z NVidia dGPU
GPU-Z NVidia dGPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Work memory
CPU-Z Work memory
CPU-Z memory slots
CPU-Z memory slots
CPU-Z Nvidia dGPU
CPU-Z Nvidia dGPU
CPU-Z AMD iGPU
CPU-Z AMD iGPU
CPU-Z benchmark
CPU-Z benchmark

Processor

As one of the most powerful mobile processors currently available, the AMD Ryzen R9-5900HX is especially used in larger laptops. The SoC also features an AMD Radeon on-board graphics chip. Thanks to the sufficiently dimensioned cooling, the eight-core processor can permanently operate with a bit more than 54 watts of power (PL1). Thus, the CineBench loop shows very constant high performances. During short-term loads, the processor clock increases up to 4.3 GHz at 65 watts. The strong R9 clearly passes the rivals in most multi-core processor benchmarks. Only the Huawei MateBook 16 AMD can keep up well despite the weaker AMD Ryzen R7.

However, Intel's Core processors are still clearly ahead of AMD's top cores in the single-core benchmarks.

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; Settings: Full Speed Mode: Ø2037 (2029.74-2050.23)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; Settings Performance Mode: Ø1945 (1916.35-2019.28)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1806 (1765.46-1841.11)
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1995 (1980.49-2009.14)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1490 (1455.29-1701.11)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6 Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø954 (921.15-990.11)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (6622 - 14363, n=28)
12524 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12309 Points ∼98%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12031 Points ∼96% -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
12166 (11410min - 12166.4max) Points ∼97% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
10531 Points ∼84% -14%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10336 Points ∼83% -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
9633 Points ∼77% -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3121 - 18373, n=82, last 2 years)
7643 Points ∼61% -38%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
6465 Points ∼52% -47%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1569 Points ∼100% +5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1498 Points ∼95% 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1495 Points ∼95%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1451 Points ∼92% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1218 - 1499, n=27)
1470 Points ∼94% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1431 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (819 - 1940, n=76, last 2 years)
1365 Points ∼87% -9%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1338 Points ∼85% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1234 Points ∼79% -17%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (2242 - 5476, n=28)
4841 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4792 Points ∼99%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4662 Points ∼96% -3%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
4660 Points ∼96% -3%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
3993 Points ∼82% -17%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
3848 Points ∼79% -20%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
3543 Points ∼73% -26%
Average of class Multimedia
  (849 - 7040, n=100, last 2 years)
2716 Points ∼56% -43%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
2382 Points ∼49% -50%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
610 Points ∼100% +6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points ∼95% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
576 Points ∼94%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
573 Points ∼94% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (471 - 584, n=27)
572 Points ∼94% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
548 Points ∼90% -5%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
518 Points ∼85% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (316 - 739, n=100, last 2 years)
508 Points ∼83% -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
482 Points ∼79% -16%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2050 (2029.74min - 2050.23max) Points ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2019 (1916.35min - 2019.28max) Points ∼98% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1076 - 2267, n=27)
2048 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2024 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2010 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2009 (1980.49min - 2009.14max) Points ∼98% -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1841 (1765.46min - 1841.11max) Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1701 (1455.29min - 1701.11max) Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (345 - 2786, n=113, last 2 years)
1208 Points ∼59% -41%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
990 Points ∼48% -52%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
242 Points ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Points ∼99% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (197 - 243, n=23)
238 Points ∼98% -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
236 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points ∼96% -4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 279, n=96, last 2 years)
201 Points ∼83% -17%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
200 Points ∼83% -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
176 Points ∼73% -27%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
542 Seconds * ∼100% -112%
Average of class Multimedia
  (183.3 - 1250, n=98, last 2 years)
488 Seconds * ∼90% -91%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
308 Seconds * ∼57% -20%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
298 Seconds * ∼55% -16%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
256 Seconds * ∼47%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
249 Seconds * ∼46% +3%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
254 Seconds * ∼47% +1%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
254 Seconds * ∼47% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (219 - 442, n=27)
250 Seconds * ∼46% +2%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58576 MIPS ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
56729 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (36011 - 62503, n=27)
57344 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53767 MIPS ∼92% -8%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
50050 MIPS ∼85% -15%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
43601 MIPS ∼74% -26%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
42570 MIPS ∼73% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9829 - 72912, n=97, last 2 years)
31794 MIPS ∼54% -46%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
25353 MIPS ∼43% -57%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5865 MIPS ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5826 MIPS ∼99% -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
5773 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (4791 - 5905, n=27)
5700 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5593 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
5427 MIPS ∼93% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
5294 MIPS ∼90% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2898 - 6186, n=97, last 2 years)
4988 MIPS ∼85% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4947 MIPS ∼84% -16%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8479 Points ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8355 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
8164 Points ∼96% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (5057 - 9294, n=25)
8130 Points ∼96% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
7716 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7641 Points ∼90% -10%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
7286 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2042 - 13925, n=98, last 2 years)
6226 Points ∼73% -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
4905 Points ∼58% -42%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1702 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1553 Points ∼91%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1542 Points ∼91% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1540 Points ∼90% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1271 - 1561, n=25)
1513 Points ∼89% -3%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1480 Points ∼87% -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
1447 Points ∼85% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (843 - 1887, n=98, last 2 years)
1389 Points ∼82% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1295 Points ∼76% -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.5 fps ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.9 fps ∼96% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (8.26 - 17.1, n=27)
15.2 fps ∼98% -2%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
14.5 fps ∼94% -6%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.4 fps ∼93% -7%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.4 fps ∼80% -20%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
11.7 fps ∼75% -25%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 21, n=97, last 2 years)
8.67 fps ∼56% -44%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
7.08 fps ∼46% -54%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
64.4 s * ∼100% -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30.2 - 99.2, n=95, last 2 years)
54.2 s * ∼84% -2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
53.2 s * ∼83%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
50.4 s * ∼78% +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (44.1 - 87.4, n=27)
53.2 s * ∼83% -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
52.4 s * ∼81% +2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
49.6 s * ∼77% +7%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
48.6 s * ∼75% +9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * ∼74% +11%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.4155 - 1.002, n=98, last 2 years)
0.611 sec * ∼100% -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.604 sec * ∼99% -22%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.573 sec * ∼94% -15%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.567 sec * ∼93% -14%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
0.551 sec * ∼90% -11%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.517 sec * ∼85% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (0.48 - 0.599, n=27)
0.507 sec * ∼83% -2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4965 sec * ∼81%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4851 sec * ∼79% +2%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2050 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
166 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
242 Points
Help
Log analysis Cinebench loop: performance drops after unplugging the power cord
Log analysis Cinebench loop: performance drops after unplugging the power cord

When the laptop is supplied with power from battery, the processor is still allowed to work with about 45 watts. Thus, the processor clock drops from about 3.6 to 3.4 GHz in the 10-minute Cinebench R23 loop.

System performance

The Vivobook Pro is a very fast laptop. In the PCMark 10 benchmark, the computer delivers very high scores. As the second in the comparison field with overall very powerful contenders, Asus' laptop can deliver more than satisfactory results. Our pre-production unit initially had problems with the performance management and some drivers, which made the system seem sluggish, but Asus has meanwhile made considerable improvements with some updates. The laptop runs smoothly and largely without dropouts on the latest version.

PCMark 10 / Score
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
6751 Points ∼100% +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6592 - 6687, n=2)
6640 Points ∼98% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6592 Points ∼98%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6442 Points ∼95% -2%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8 R5000, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6365 Points ∼94% -3%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
6019 Points ∼89% -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5333 Points ∼79% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3528 - 7816, n=82, last 2 years)
5248 Points ∼78% -20%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8 R5000, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
10690 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10491 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10348 - 10491, n=2)
10420 Points ∼97% -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
9915 Points ∼93% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
9490 Points ∼89% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7628 - 10945, n=82, last 2 years)
9333 Points ∼87% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9185 Points ∼86% -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8931 Points ∼84% -15%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8 R5000, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
9729 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9665 Points ∼99%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9614 - 9665, n=2)
9640 Points ∼99% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8554 Points ∼88% -11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
8461 Points ∼87% -12%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
8344 Points ∼86% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7916 Points ∼81% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5457 - 10050, n=82, last 2 years)
7643 Points ∼79% -21%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
9952 Points ∼100% +30%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8663 Points ∼87% +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7667 - 8158, n=2)
7913 Points ∼80% +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
7667 Points ∼77%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
7475 Points ∼75% -3%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8 R5000, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6730 Points ∼68% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2679 - 11777, n=82, last 2 years)
5632 Points ∼57% -27%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5388 Points ∼54% -30%
PCMark 10 Score
6592 points
Help

DPC latencies

In the test with LatencyMon, there were brief problems with the interaction of different drivers. Even with the latest updates from Asus, not all problems have been solved yet. Very high short-term fluctuations in the observed latencies are the result.

Such a jerk occurred during the playback of the 4k60 YouTube test video. The result was 35 skipped frames in one piece. A picture that stands still for a bit more than half a second is clearly noticeable.

LatencyMon Main Tab
LatencyMon Main Tab
LatencyMon Drivers
LatencyMon Drivers
Youtube playback
Youtube playback
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
4336 μs * ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2029 μs * ∼47% +53%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
1914 μs * ∼44% +56%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
1508 μs * ∼35% +65%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
GeForce MX450, i5-11300H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
629 μs * ∼15% +85%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Vega 8 R5000, R7 5800H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
454.3 μs * ∼10% +90%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

Even though the measurement results of AS SSD and CrystalDiskMark 6.0 are a bit apart, SK Hynix's M.2 NVMe SSD is very fast when transferring larger files. The rest of the scores in access times and transfer of smaller files are in the mediocre of the laptops in the comparison. With one TB of storage, there is enough space for smaller video projects.

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
Lite-On CA5-8D512
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-3%
15%
1%
26%
-2%
10%
Write 4K
129.9
110.5
-15%
129.3
0%
126
-3%
203
56%
109.3
-16%
157.3 ?(115.9 - 218, n=12)
21%
Read 4K
47.02
51.8
10%
54.3
15%
44.94
-4%
52.3
11%
53.9
15%
57.1 ?(25.6 - 73.2, n=12)
21%
Write Seq
2071
2763
2138
1991
4154 ?(1916 - 18545, n=9)
Read Seq
2505
1671
1974
1759
2171 ?(1991 - 2492, n=9)
Write 4K Q32T1
510
429.8
-16%
446.6
-12%
451.6
-11%
640
25%
499.8
-2%
458 ?(390 - 525, n=12)
-10%
Read 4K Q32T1
442
418.3
-5%
564
28%
552
25%
707
60%
438.8
-1%
449 ?(346 - 524, n=12)
2%
Write Seq Q32T1
2784
3060
10%
2210
-21%
3060
10%
2973
7%
2835
2%
2864 ?(1390 - 3166, n=12)
3%
Read Seq Q32T1
3601
3539
-2%
3418
-5%
3192
-11%
3559
-1%
3235
-10%
3512 ?(3219 - 3607, n=12)
-2%
Write 4K Q8T8
527
1254
138%
791 ?(485 - 1665, n=4)
50%
Read 4K Q8T8
1776
1388
-22%
1649 ?(1276 - 2024, n=4)
-7%
AS SSD
13%
-2%
7%
17%
-21%
10%
Seq Read
2913
2953
1%
2955
1%
2331
-20%
2541
-13%
1362
-53%
2834 ?(2635 - 3133, n=14)
-3%
Seq Write
1806
1691
-6%
2080
15%
2312
28%
2555
41%
1440
-20%
1919 ?(1243 - 2969, n=14)
6%
4K Read
47.67
43.98
-8%
51.1
7%
39.13
-18%
56
17%
38.43
-19%
52.7 ?(28.8 - 66.9, n=14)
11%
4K Write
101.5
105.4
4%
127.5
26%
98.1
-3%
129.6
28%
121.4
20%
126.8 ?(59 - 184.8, n=14)
25%
4K-64 Read
1382
1065
-23%
1321
-4%
1663
20%
1633
18%
370.5
-73%
1404 ?(1011 - 1923, n=14)
2%
4K-64 Write
2164
1957
-10%
1103
-49%
2138
-1%
1863
-14%
1054
-51%
1930 ?(1342 - 2216, n=14)
-11%
Access Time Read *
0.044
0.04
9%
0.034
23%
0.099
-125%
0.077
-75%
0.042
5%
0.04764 ?(0.028 - 0.093, n=14)
-8%
Access Time Write *
0.109
0.105
4%
0.031
72%
0.038
65%
0.029
73%
0.135
-24%
0.05114 ?(0.028 - 0.109, n=14)
53%
Score Read
1720
1404
-18%
1668
-3%
1935
13%
1944
13%
545
-68%
1740 ?(1330 - 2291, n=14)
1%
Score Write
2446
2232
-9%
1439
-41%
2468
1%
2248
-8%
1319
-46%
2248 ?(1638 - 2660, n=14)
-8%
Score Total
4995
4297
-14%
3922
-21%
5388
8%
5192
4%
2160
-57%
4839 ?(3615 - 6117, n=14)
-3%
Copy ISO MB/s
2649
2474
-7%
1480
-44%
2903
10%
2246
-15%
1406
-47%
1908 ?(1277 - 2649, n=9)
-28%
Copy Program MB/s
372.8
1074
188%
377.6
1%
686
84%
861
131%
844
126%
697 ?(373 - 964, n=9)
87%
Copy Game MB/s
1126
1929
71%
1045
-7%
1594
42%
1552
38%
1353
20%
1375 ?(858 - 1855, n=9)
22%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / 8%
7% / 4%
4% / 6%
22% / 20%
-12% / -15%
10% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3601 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2784 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 442 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 510 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.02 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 129.9 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 527 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1776 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics card

The Asus Vivobook Pro is equipped with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti as the dGPU. The 3050 Ti is powerful enough to play current games at high detail levels in Full HD resolution. However, the second smallest graphics card from Nvidia's RTX 3000 series reaches its limits at higher resolutions. Nvidia allows configuring the maximum power consumption between 35 and 80 watts for the 3050 Ti. In the Asus Vivobook Pro, the graphics card operates with a maximum of 50 watts.

To improve energy efficiency, a smaller AMD Radeon graphics supports on the R9 APU. It reliably processes smaller tasks. Only when higher demands are placed on the graphics in games or applications does the Nvidia graphics chip seamlessly switch on.

The results of the benchmarks with 3DMark and 3DMark11 show the maximum performance chosen by Asus very well. The graphics card in the Asus computer operates slightly faster than the 3050 Ti in the Dell XPS 15 but is below the average of the 3050's in our Benchmark table.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
31866 Points ∼100% +96%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
28908 Points ∼91% +77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13939 - 20905, n=17)
18191 Points ∼57% +12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
16296 Points ∼51%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
15387 Points ∼48% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1365 - 33856, n=84, last 2 years)
11348 Points ∼36% -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
9580 Points ∼30% -41%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
6117 Points ∼19% -62%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (35820 - 91513, n=15)
63714 Points ∼100% +60%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
63674 Points ∼100% +60%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
48479 Points ∼76% +22%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
45531 Points ∼71% +14%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
39886 Points ∼63%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6498 - 87836, n=66, last 2 years)
36339 Points ∼57% -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
33806 Points ∼53% -15%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
29795 Points ∼47% -25%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
23674 Points ∼100% +130%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
21399 Points ∼90% +108%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10288 - 14815, n=17)
13220 Points ∼56% +28%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
12119 Points ∼51% +18%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
10288 Points ∼43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (920 - 25285, n=89, last 2 years)
8027 Points ∼34% -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
5573 Points ∼24% -46%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
3734 Points ∼16% -64%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
9323 Points ∼100% +96%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
7909 Points ∼85% +67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4041 - 6122, n=18)
5277 Points ∼57% +11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4747 Points ∼51%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
4591 Points ∼49% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (301 - 9746, n=83, last 2 years)
2949 Points ∼32% -38%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i5-11300H
2300 Points ∼25% -52%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1186 Points ∼13% -75%
3DMark 11 Performance
16066 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
41830 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30802 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9720 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
5016 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5126 points
Help

The graphics performance also drops on battery power, but not as significantly as in some other laptops. With almost eleven thousand points in 3DMark 11, the laptop retains more than 60% of the performance with an external power source.

3DMark 11 battery
3DMark 11 battery
3DMark 11 network
3DMark 11 network

Gaming performance

The Asus Vivobook Pro shows the performance readiness of an entry-level gaming laptop in the gaming benchmarks. Games in Full HD are no obstacle for the notebook even with current titles and high detail levels. However, as soon as you want to use the full resolution of the OLED panel, the multimedia notebook reaches its limits in current titles.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
168 (129min - 191max) fps ∼100% +140%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
154.2 (135min - 171max) fps ∼92% +120%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (70 - 104.2, n=17)
91.5 fps ∼54% +31%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
91 fps ∼54% +30%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
70 fps ∼42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9 - 177, n=78, last 2 years)
54.7 fps ∼33% -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
42.8 (12.2min, 16.6P0.1, 29.7P1 - 169max) fps ∼25% -39%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
22 fps ∼13% -69%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
92.1 (67min) fps ∼100% +92%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
81.5 (72min - 87max) fps ∼88% +70%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
48 fps ∼52%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (34.3 - 58.4, n=21)
47.7 fps ∼52% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
43.7 (32min, 34P1 - 48max) fps ∼47% -9%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37.1 (33min, 35P1 - 46max) fps ∼40% -23%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
36.2 (31min, 32P1 - 46max) fps ∼39% -25%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
34.3 (30min, 31P1 - 42max) fps ∼37% -29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5 - 98.2, n=83, last 2 years)
33.9 fps ∼37% -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
24.3 (12.1min, 14.5P0.1, 19.1P1 - 111max) fps ∼26% -49%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
14.6 (13min, 14P1 - 16max) fps ∼16% -70%
F1 2021
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
131 (106min, 97P1 - 146max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (72 - 150, n=10)
124.3 fps ∼95% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
123 (104min, 86P1 - 136max) fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.9 - 236, n=14, last 2 years)
92.6 fps ∼71% -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
57.7 (41min, 40P1 - 67max) fps ∼44% -56%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
40.3 (32min, 32P1 - 46max) fps ∼31% -69%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
105 (85min, 61P1 - 120max) fps ∼100% 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
105 (93min, 79P1 - 118max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68 - 131, n=10)
103.2 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (26 - 196, n=12, last 2 years)
84.4 fps ∼80% -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
46.9 (37min, 34P1 - 54max) fps ∼45% -55%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
30.9 (26min, 25P1 - 33max) fps ∼29% -71%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (20.2 - 107, n=11, last 2 years)
57.1 fps ∼100% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44.4 - 69, n=10)
53.4 fps ∼94% +2%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
52.8 (45min, 44P1 - 59max) fps ∼92% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
52.3 fps ∼92%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
21.4 (16min, 16P1 - 24max) fps ∼37% -59%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 84, n=4, last 2 years)
48.6 fps ∼100% +31%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37.4 (32min, 31P1 - 42max) fps ∼77% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.9 - 43.1, n=4)
37.1 fps ∼76% 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37 (30min, 30P1 - 42max) fps ∼76%
GTA V
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
172 (6.33min, 125P1 - 314max) fps ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
166 (5min, 100P1 - 392max) fps ∼97%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (88.4 - 180, n=14)
159.5 fps ∼93%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
154 (5.16min, 90.9P1 - 291max) fps ∼90%
Average of class Multimedia
  (33.1 - 185, n=38, last 2 years)
127.2 fps ∼74%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
103 (18.8min, 66.7P1 - 174max) fps ∼60%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
171 (4.86min, 125P1 - 334max) fps ∼100% +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
169 (5.09min, 111P1 - 283max) fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (158 - 178, n=11)
167.3 fps ∼98% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
135 (5.64min, 76.9P1 - 280max) fps ∼79% -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (48.4 - 182, n=29, last 2 years)
125.5 fps ∼73% -26%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
153 (3.86min, 83.3P1 - 295max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (62.2 - 149, n=16)
118.7 fps ∼78%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
110 (13.5min, 50P1 - 231max) fps ∼72%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.2 - 179, n=40, last 2 years)
78 fps ∼51%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
68.3 (24.7min, 45.5P1 - 145max) fps ∼45%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
26.3 (6.93min, 18.9P1 - 126max) fps ∼17%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135.8 (95.1min) fps ∼100% +4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
131 (115.3min) fps ∼96%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
125 (109.8min) fps ∼92% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
124 (107.1min) fps ∼91% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (78.8 - 154, n=18)
122.5 fps ∼90% -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
121 (100.3min) fps ∼89% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
104 (91.9min) fps ∼77% -21%
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.8 - 168, n=94, last 2 years)
86.5 fps ∼64% -34%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
53.7 (49min) fps ∼40% -59%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
126 (111.1min) fps ∼100%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
119 (103.2min) fps ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
117 (100.7min) fps ∼93% -7%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
116.3 (90.8min) fps ∼92% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (73.7 - 145, n=18)
115.6 fps ∼92% -8%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
109 (92.1min) fps ∼87% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
95.5 (80.2min) fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13.4 - 160, n=94, last 2 years)
80.8 fps ∼64% -36%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
50.8 (47.1min) fps ∼40% -60%
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
98.8 (86min) fps ∼100% +82%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
93.1 (67.6min) fps ∼94% +71%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.1 - 119, n=26, last 2 years)
64.3 fps ∼65% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (53.7 - 76.6, n=4)
64 fps ∼65% +18%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
54.4 (50.8min) fps ∼55%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
53.7 (50.1min) fps ∼54% -1%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
112 fps ∼100% +90%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
104 fps ∼93% +77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (51.5 - 106, n=15)
71.5 fps ∼64% +22%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
58.8 fps ∼53%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
51.6 fps ∼46% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.87 - 112, n=48, last 2 years)
41.9 fps ∼37% -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
33 fps ∼29% -44%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
18.1 fps ∼16% -69%
1920x1080 High Quality
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
87.6 fps ∼100% +104%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
78.5 fps ∼90% +83%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (37.4 - 106, n=15)
53.1 fps ∼61% +23%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
43 fps ∼49%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
37.4 fps ∼43% -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.79 - 90.9, n=51, last 2 years)
33.1 fps ∼38% -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
21.2 fps ∼24% -51%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
12.1 fps ∼14% -72%
2560x1440 High Quality
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
65.7 fps ∼100% +113%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61.3 fps ∼93% +98%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.17 - 65.7, n=17, last 2 years)
41.6 fps ∼63% +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (26.8 - 53.1, n=5)
35.7 fps ∼54% +16%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
30.9 fps ∼47%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
26.8 fps ∼41% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
13.5 fps ∼21% -56%
3840x2160 High Quality
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
40.9 fps ∼100% +146%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
36.2 fps ∼89% +118%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.8 - 41.8, n=13, last 2 years)
28.5 fps ∼70% +72%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (16.6 - 21.4, n=2)
19 fps ∼46% +14%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
16.6 fps ∼41%
Dirt 5
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (58.9 - 84.3, n=5)
73.3 fps ∼100% +17%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62.6 (29.9min, 41.4P0.1, 51.7P1 - 107.9max) fps ∼85%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13.9 - 66, n=12, last 2 years)
31.2 fps ∼43% -50%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
25.8 (14.9min, 16.3P0.1, 21P1 - 34.2max) fps ∼35% -59%
1920x1080 High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (51.2 - 69.1, n=5)
61.5 fps ∼100% +20%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
51.2 (29.3min, 37P0.1, 40.6P1 - 70.4max) fps ∼83%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.6 - 51.2, n=10, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼40% -52%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
16.3 (9.6min, 12.3P0.1, 12.8P1 - 22.1max) fps ∼27% -68%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (40.5 - 54.3, n=5)
49.3 fps ∼100% +22%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
40.5 (28.9min, 32.3P0.1, 33.8P1 - 51.6max) fps ∼82%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.3 - 40.5, n=9, last 2 years)
19.9 fps ∼40% -51%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
11.4 (8.8min, 9.1P0.1, 9.5P1 - 15.1max) fps ∼23% -72%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
224 (73.7min, 176P1 - 365max) fps ∼100% +90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (100 - 140.1, n=16)
125.9 fps ∼56% +7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
118 (86.8min, 98.7P1 - 182max) fps ∼53%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
117 fps ∼52% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12 - 224, n=45, last 2 years)
80.6 fps ∼36% -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
53.2 (44.2min, 46.6P1 - 68.5max) fps ∼24% -55%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
33 fps ∼15% -72%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
183 (77.1min, 132P1 - 322max) fps ∼100% +92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (79.2 - 114.5, n=15)
102.4 fps ∼56% +8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X-M7600QE
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
95.2 (64.7min, 71.6P1 - 151max) fps ∼52%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
94 fps ∼51% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11 - 183, n=45, last 2 years)
64.1 fps ∼35% -33%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16IHU6
Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
46.7 (38.7min, 39.3P1 - 62.7max) fps ∼26% -51%
Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000)
29 fps ∼16% -70%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU