Notebookcheck Logo

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM laptop review: Peak GeForce RTX 3060 performance

140 W TGP GeForce RTX 3060. Aside from the obvious CPU update to 12th gen Alder Lake-H, the FX507 carries significant changes over last year's FX506 both inside and out. Performance hunters will especially appreciate the high TGP target relative to other gaming laptops of similar size.

Asus has refreshed its TUF Gaming F15 series for 2022 now that the Intel 12th gen CPU series is widely available. Instead of a simple CPU swap, however, the manufacturer has updated significant aspects of last year's FX506 chassis in order to create the FX507. This review will go over all the key differences between the 2021 FX506 and 2022 FX507 as well as what performance levels users can expect from the FX507.

Our configuration in review comes with the Alder Lake-H Core i7-12700H CPU, GeForce RTX 3060 GPU, 300 Hz 1080p IPS panel, and 90 Wh battery for approximately $1500 USD retail. Other SKUs with slower display refresh rates, smaller 56 Wh battery, and slower CPU options may be available. Note that even though the FX507 comes with the same GeForce RTX 3060 GPU as on the older FX506, the GPU in the newer model targets a much higher TGP to squeeze out more performance (140 W vs. 95 W).

Competitors to the FX507 include other midrange 15.6-inch thin-and-light gaming laptops like the Razer Blade 15 Base Model, MSI GP66, Acer Predator Triton, or the Gigabyte Aorus 5 series.

More Asus reviews:

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM (TUF Gaming F15 FX507 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6144 MB, Core: 1605 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 140 W TDP, GDDR6, 511.79, Optimus, MUX
Memory
16384 MB 
, SK Hynix, DDR5-4800, 2400 MHz, Dual-Channel, 40-39-39-76
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, TL156VDXP0101, IPS, glossy: no, 300 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24.95 x 354.9 x 251.9 ( = 0.98 x 13.97 x 9.92 in)
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Armoury Crate, MyAsus, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.077 kg ( = 73.26 oz / 4.58 pounds), Power Supply: 656 g ( = 23.14 oz / 1.45 pounds)
Price
1500 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.2 %
03/2022
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg24.95 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.9 %
06/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.4 %
02/2021
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2 kg20 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.3 %
07/2021
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"2560x1440
82.9 %
09/2020
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.1 kg19 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.4 %
06/2021
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.5 mm15.60"3840x2160

Case — Smaller and Lighter

The FX507 may look identical to the FX506 at first glance, but there are actually numerous small changes. The corners, for example, are sharper than before while the faux-brushed glossy palm rests are now a flatter matte texture. Most of the bumps and alternating textures on the FX506 have been removed for a cleaner and more minimalistic look. Chassis materials appear to be otherwise the same as last year's model for a similar level of rigidity.

Asus has managed to cut down both the size and weight of the FX507 when compared to its FX506 predecessor. The newer model is slightly shorter (354.9 mm vs. 359.8 mm), slightly narrower (251.9 mm x 256 mm), and a fair bit lighter (2.1 kg vs. 2.3 kg) to be just as light as the thinner Zephyrus S15 design.

Smooth matte palm rests, keyboard, and clickpad attract fingerprints like no tomorrow
Smooth matte palm rests, keyboard, and clickpad attract fingerprints like no tomorrow
Lid opened to maximum angle (~145 degrees)
Lid opened to maximum angle (~145 degrees)
Hinges are small and not as strong as the hinges on the ROG Strix or Scar series
Hinges are small and not as strong as the hinges on the ROG Strix or Scar series
The stylized metal outer lid is a signature look for the TUF series
The stylized metal outer lid is a signature look for the TUF series
The four LEDs near the center are arranged in a new clover-like formation
The four LEDs near the center are arranged in a new clover-like formation
Bottom panel is stylized with more corners and accents than on most other laptops
Bottom panel is stylized with more corners and accents than on most other laptops

Size Comparison

359 mm / 14.1 inch 256 mm / 10.1 inch 24.9 mm / 0.98 inch 2.3 kg5 lbs359.8 mm / 14.2 inch 249.2 mm / 9.81 inch 21.5 mm / 0.846 inch 2.4 kg5.29 lbs354 mm / 13.9 inch 259 mm / 10.2 inch 27.2 mm / 1.071 inch 2.3 kg5.1 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 252 mm / 9.92 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2 kg4.51 lbs354.9 mm / 14 inch 251.9 mm / 9.92 inch 24.95 mm / 0.982 inch 2.1 kg4.58 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 252 mm / 9.92 inch 19 mm / 0.748 inch 2.1 kg4.61 lbs

Connectivity — One More USB-C Port

Port options have changed slightly from the FX506. More specifically, the FX507 has dropped one USB-A port for a second USB-C port. All other ports are otherwise identical.

Keep in mind that the laptop must be on MSHybrid mode if connecting any Thunderbolt 4 devices. This is a limitation to all laptops running on 12th gen Alder Lake-H CPUs thus far.

Front: No ports
Front: No ports
Right: USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1
Right: USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1
Rear: No ports
Rear: No ports
Left: AC adapter, RJ-45, HDMI 2.0b, 1x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 + DisplayPort 1.4, 1x USB-C w/ DisplayPort 1.4, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1
Left: AC adapter, RJ-45, HDMI 2.0b, 1x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 + DisplayPort 1.4, 1x USB-C w/ DisplayPort 1.4, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1

Communication

The Intel AX201 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 connectivity and Bluetooth 5.2. We experienced no issues when paired to our Netgear RAX200 test router. The WLAN module is positioned underneath the M.2 2280 SSD slot
The Intel AX201 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 connectivity and Bluetooth 5.2. We experienced no issues when paired to our Netgear RAX200 test router. The WLAN module is positioned underneath the M.2 2280 SSD slot
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1394 (497min - 1498max) MBit/s ∼100% +33%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1310 MBit/s ∼94% +25%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1045 (936min - 1115max) MBit/s ∼75%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
973 MBit/s ∼70% -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
787 (675min - 851max) MBit/s ∼56% -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
MediaTek MT7921
631 (581min - 693max) MBit/s ∼45% -40%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1445 (1383min - 1538max) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1420 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1330 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1285 (728min - 1461max) MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
MediaTek MT7921
878 (827min - 896max) MBit/s ∼61% -39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
MediaTek MT7921
852 (831min - 887max) MBit/s ∼59% -41%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1383-1538)
; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1045 (936-1115)

Webcam

Camera quality is poor from the 720p webcam. There is no privacy shutter or Windows Hello support, either.

ColorChecker
11.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
11 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
12 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM: 10.96 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 17.26 ∆E

Maintenance

The bottom panel is relatively easy to remove with a Philips screwdriver and flat edge. The internals have been revamped as shown by the comparison images below, but the 2x SODIMM slots, 2x M.2 SSD slots, and removable WLAN module remains.

Asus FX507ZM
Asus FX507ZM
Asus FX506HM for comparison. Note the fewer copper heat pipes when compared to the FX507
Asus FX506HM for comparison. Note the fewer copper heat pipes when compared to the FX507

Accessories and Warranty

There are no extras in the box other than the usual AC adapter and paperwork. The typical one-year manufacturer warranty applies.

Input Devices — Different But Not Necessarily Better

Keyboard

Asus has revised the keyboard layout when compared to the FX506. Some of the auxiliary keys are now in their own row near the top left while the arrow keys are now slightly longer in length. The font on each key is also darker and grayer which unfortunately makes it more difficult to read.

Both key feedback and the single-zone RGB backlight remain identical year-over-year. We find the keys to the lighter and softer side when compared to the keys on the Eurocom RX315 while being very close to the keyboards on most Zephyrus S models.

Touchpad

The FX507 has dropped the dedicated mouse buttons on the FX506 for a larger clickpad surface area (13 x 7.8 cm vs. 10.6 x 8.0 cm). Gliding is smooth at all speeds with very little sticking, but feedback is weak and somewhat spongy when inputting clicks. Drag-and-drag actions are therefore not as comfortable as on the older FX506.

New keyboard layout
New keyboard layout
Clickpad is larger but spongier than the one of the FX506
Clickpad is larger but spongier than the one of the FX506
The darker key font contrast poorly with the black key caps
The darker key font contrast poorly with the black key caps
The numpad and arrow keys are smaller than the main QWERTY keys
The numpad and arrow keys are smaller than the main QWERTY keys

Display — 300 Hz with Adaptive Sync

Asus has upgraded the 240 Hz Sharp LQ156M1JW26 IPS panel on the older FX516PR for a faster 300 Hz Sharp TL156VDXP0101 IPS panel on the FX507. Aside from the higher refresh rate, the newer panel also provides faster gray-gray response times and a brighter backlight while maintaining roughly the same contrast ratio and gamut as on the FX516PR.

We're happy to see that Asus has dropped the horrid Chi Mei panel on the FX506 which had significantly inferior colors and response times.

No edge-to-edge glass options. Bottom "chin" bezel remains thick
No edge-to-edge glass options. Bottom "chin" bezel remains thick
Very narrow bezels on three sides
Very narrow bezels on three sides
Picture is only slightly grainier than a glossy alternative
Picture is only slightly grainier than a glossy alternative
Moderate uneven backlight bleeding along the left edge and corners of the display
Moderate uneven backlight bleeding along the left edge and corners of the display
330.3
cd/m²
351.4
cd/m²
331.8
cd/m²
338.9
cd/m²
353.7
cd/m²
351.4
cd/m²
315.6
cd/m²
344.6
cd/m²
346.3
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
TL156VDXP0101
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 353.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 340.4 cd/m² Minimum: 8.18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 353.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1040:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 0.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
68.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
TL156VDXP0101, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
LQ156M1JW26 (SHP1532), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
SDC4143, OLED + IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Display
-36%
0%
25%
4%
33%
Display P3 Coverage
66.4
41.9
-37%
66.9
1%
97.6
47%
69.7
5%
99.9
50%
sRGB Coverage
97
62.9
-35%
98.1
1%
99.9
3%
99.7
3%
100
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68.5
43.3
-37%
67.9
-1%
85.3
25%
71.1
4%
99.7
46%
Response Times
-238%
-46%
-74%
-63%
69%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
5.6 ?(3.2, 2.4)
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
-407%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-114%
14 ?(7.2, 6.8)
-150%
14 ?(6.8, 7.2)
-150%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
57%
Response Time Black / White *
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
21.6 ?(11.6, 10)
-69%
10 ?(5.6, 4.4)
22%
12.4 ?(7.2, 5.2)
3%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
25%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
81%
PWM Frequency
23580 ?(30)
59.5 ?(81)
Screen
-144%
-27%
-70%
-29%
-87%
Brightness middle
353.7
268.3
-24%
286
-19%
304.3
-14%
283
-20%
345
-2%
Brightness
340
257
-24%
275
-19%
286
-16%
289
-15%
332
-2%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
91
2%
76
-15%
90
1%
87
-2%
Black Level *
0.34
0.34
-0%
0.25
26%
0.33
3%
0.24
29%
Contrast
1040
789
-24%
1144
10%
922
-11%
1179
13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.74
5.05
-190%
2.43
-40%
2.76
-59%
2.26
-30%
3.3
-90%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.63
15.43
-325%
6.33
-74%
5.57
-53%
5.64
-55%
7.2
-98%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.5
3.21
-542%
0.83
-66%
2.38
-376%
1.11
-122%
2.6
-420%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
5.5
-162%
3.5
-67%
4
-90%
3.4
-62%
2
5%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.35 94%
2.32 95%
2.14 103%
2.228 99%
2.01 109%
CCT
6257 104%
7392 88%
7145 91%
6844 95%
7249 90%
6566 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
68
71
89.2
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
93
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-139% / -134%
-24% / -24%
-40% / -50%
-29% / -27%
5% / -31%

* ... smaller is better

There are no significant color space changes between the FX506 and FX507. Asus does not offer any AdobeRGB or DCI-P3 coverage options for its FX507 series unlike on the Razer Blade 15 series or professional ZenBook series.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3

The display is well-calibrated out of the box with average grayscale and color deltaE values of only 2.1 and 1.74, respectively. Calibrating the display even further ourselves with an X-Rite colorimeter would improve deltaE even more to less than 1 each.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.2 ms rise
↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21805 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Wide IPS viewing angles. Contrast and colors degrade only if viewing from extreme angles
Wide IPS viewing angles. Contrast and colors degrade only if viewing from extreme angles
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade

Performance — The Intel 12th Gen Difference

 
 

Testing Conditions

Our unit was set to Turbo mode and discrete GPU mode via the pre-installed Armoury Crate profile prior to running any performance benchmarks below. It's recommended that owners become familiar with this software as it serves as the hub for monitoring performance, toggling auxiliary features, and switching between performance profiles. Most notably, users can switch between MSHybrid or MUX graphics modes directly through the software. The previous FX506 model did not have a MUX switch.

Advanced Optimus is not supported meaning a soft reboot is required when switching between discrete or Optimus graphics. For Adaptive Sync to work on the internal display, users must run on MSHybrid mode as dGPU MUX mode does not support Adaptive Sync. G-Sync and FreeSync can be enabled on a supported external monitor regardless of GPU mode so long as it is connected via USB-C DisplayPort and not HDMI.

CPU TDP and GPU TGP targets will vary depending on the Armoury Crate power profile as detailed by the table below. Thus, owners must run the system in Turbo or Manual modes to get the most power out of the FX507.

Power Profile Silent Performance Turbo Manual 
Target CPU PL1 45 W70 W 90 W 100 W 
Target CPU PL2  60 W105 W 115 W 135 W 
Target GPU TGP<115 W (WhisperMode 2.0 on) 100 W + 15 W 115 W + 25 W 115 W + 25 W 
Target Max TDP+TGP25 W + <100 W (WhisperMode 2.0 on) 35 W + 100 W 45 W + 115 W 45 W + 115 W 
Target dB(A) (Manufacturer Provided)<35 dB(A) 40 dB(A) 48 dB(A) 52 dB(A)


Processor

CPU performance is excellent and exactly where we expect it to be relative to other laptops with the exact same CPU. When compared to the Core i7-11800H on last year's FX506, the Core i7-12700H can offer roughly 17 percent and 30 percent faster single-thread and multi-thread performance, respectively. Overall performance is essentially on par with the more expensive Core i9-12900H while being ahead of the Core i7-12800H as found on the Razer Blade 15.

Turbo Boost sustainability is good as our initial score of 2735 points would only drop by a few percentage points when running CineBench R15 xT in a loop.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2656 (2614.89-2735.42)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2372 (2349.62-2449.33)
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2624 (2577.65-2843.74)
Eurocom RX315 NH57AF1 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1697 (1672.94-1779.91)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2055.92-2084.96)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
9630 Points ∼100% +43%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
6754 Points ∼70%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
6594 Points ∼68% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7382, n=29)
6045 Points ∼63% -10%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points ∼60% -15%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5182 Points ∼54% -23%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4913 Points ∼51% -27%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4529 Points ∼47% -33%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3993 Points ∼41% -41%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
3582 Points ∼37% -47%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
2975 Points ∼31% -56%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
2410 Points ∼25% -64%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
777 Points ∼100% +14%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
730 Points ∼94% +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points ∼89% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
680 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 702, n=29)
672 Points ∼86% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points ∼75% -14%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
577 Points ∼74% -15%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
558 Points ∼72% -18%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
531 Points ∼68% -22%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
479 Points ∼62% -30%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
451 Points ∼58% -34%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
421 Points ∼54% -38%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
25245 Points ∼100% +43%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
17713 (16651.9min - 17712.9max) Points ∼70%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
16812 (15129.6min - 16812.1max) Points ∼67% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19250, n=30)
16179 Points ∼64% -9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points ∼59% -16%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
13445 (12565.7min - 13444.6max) Points ∼53% -24%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12663 Points ∼50% -29%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
11746 Points ∼47% -34%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
10947 Points ∼43% -38%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
9166 Points ∼36% -48%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
7953 Points ∼32% -55%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
2011 Points ∼100% +14%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1887 Points ∼94% +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points ∼89% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
1771 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1825, n=29)
1747 Points ∼87% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
1509 Points ∼75% -15%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1449 Points ∼72% -18%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1427 Points ∼71% -19%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1343 Points ∼67% -24%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1228 Points ∼61% -31%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
1172 Points ∼58% -34%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
3473 Points ∼100% +27%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
2735 (2614.89min - 2735.42max) Points ∼79%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2903, n=31)
2545 Points ∼73% -7%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
2449 (2349.62min - 2449.33max) Points ∼71% -10%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points ∼63% -20%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
2095 (1963.38min - 2095.12max) Points ∼60% -23%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2093 (2068.68min - 2093.36max) Points ∼60% -23%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2085 (2055.92min - 2084.96max) Points ∼60% -24%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1755 (1601.67min - 1755.16max) Points ∼51% -36%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1522 Points ∼44% -44%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1466 Points ∼42% -46%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1435 Points ∼41% -48%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
1327 Points ∼38% -51%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1156 (1010.13min - 1155.97max) Points ∼33% -58%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
292 Points ∼100% +15%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
273 Points ∼93% +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points ∼88% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
253 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=29)
252 Points ∼86% 0%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
239 Points ∼82% -6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
230 Points ∼79% -9%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points ∼78% -9%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
223 Points ∼76% -12%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
198 Points ∼68% -22%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
189 Points ∼65% -25%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points ∼60% -31%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
450 Seconds * ∼100% -147%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
355 Seconds * ∼79% -95%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
332 Seconds * ∼74% -82%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
280 Seconds * ∼62% -54%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
244 Seconds * ∼54% -34%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
241 Seconds * ∼54% -32%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
235 Seconds * ∼52% -29%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (171 - 732, n=28)
227 Seconds * ∼50% -25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * ∼50% -24%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
197 Seconds * ∼44% -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
182 Seconds * ∼40%
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
128.3 Seconds * ∼29% +30%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
96960 MIPS ∼100% +44%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
67160 MIPS ∼69%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
66678 MIPS ∼69% -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS ∼64% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=28)
61274 MIPS ∼63% -9%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58752 MIPS ∼61% -13%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
58467 MIPS ∼60% -13%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
51046 MIPS ∼53% -24%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48534 MIPS ∼50% -28%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
43065 MIPS ∼44% -36%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
36926 MIPS ∼38% -45%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
33899 MIPS ∼35% -50%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
6580 MIPS ∼100% +22%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
6071 MIPS ∼92% +13%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5737 MIPS ∼87% +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS ∼87% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5659 MIPS ∼86% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5590 MIPS ∼85% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5863, n=28)
5571 MIPS ∼85% +4%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
5439 MIPS ∼83% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
5381 MIPS ∼82%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5313 MIPS ∼81% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
4969 MIPS ∼76% -8%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
4622 MIPS ∼70% -14%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
17698 Points ∼100% +43%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points ∼70% +1%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
12382 Points ∼70% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
12358 Points ∼70%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=29)
11733 Points ∼66% -5%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8689 Points ∼49% -30%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8389 Points ∼47% -32%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7850 Points ∼44% -36%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
6364 Points ∼36% -49%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
6210 Points ∼35% -50%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
6068 Points ∼34% -51%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
1969 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1883 Points ∼96% +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points ∼89% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
1751 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=29)
1723 Points ∼88% -2%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1561 Points ∼79% -11%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1501 Points ∼76% -14%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1429 Points ∼73% -18%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1299 Points ∼66% -26%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
1218 Points ∼62% -30%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1141 Points ∼58% -35%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
29 fps ∼100% +41%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.5 fps ∼71%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.8 fps ∼68% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps ∼59% -16%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.4, n=30)
17.1 fps ∼59% -17%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.6 fps ∼54% -24%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.6 fps ∼54% -24%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.6 fps ∼54% -24%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13.2 fps ∼46% -36%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
11.5 fps ∼40% -44%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.2 fps ∼35% -50%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
9.1 fps ∼31% -56%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
89 s * ∼100% -78%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
53.6 s * ∼60% -7%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53.5 s * ∼60% -7%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.9 s * ∼59% -6%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * ∼58% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
49.9 s * ∼56%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 92, n=28)
45.7 s * ∼51% +8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
44.9 s * ∼50% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.5 s * ∼50% +11%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
40.3 s * ∼45% +19%
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
38.1 s * ∼43% +24%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.664 sec * ∼100% -43%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-786B
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.635 sec * ∼96% -36%
Alienware m15 R4 RTX 3080
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.592 sec * ∼89% -27%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * ∼84% -19%
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
0.533 sec * ∼80% -15%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.512 sec * ∼77% -10%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4969 sec * ∼75% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.448 - 1.052, n=28)
0.4796 sec * ∼72% -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * ∼71% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4655 sec * ∼70%
MSI Vector GP66 12UGS
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4218 sec * ∼64% +9%
Corsair One i300
Intel Core i9-12900K
0.3946 sec * ∼59% +15%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2735 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
202 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
253 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
94.8 pt ∼95%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
74.3 pt ∼74%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
73.6 pt ∼74%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
67.6 pt ∼68%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
66.2 pt ∼66%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
49.2 pt ∼49%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 pt ∼0%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
15150 KRay/s ∼100% +60%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
14175 KRay/s ∼94% +49%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
12191 KRay/s ∼80% +29%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9486 KRay/s ∼63%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8079 KRay/s ∼53% -15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 9576, n=28)
8067 KRay/s ∼53% -15%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
100744 Points ∼100% +143%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
71105 Points ∼71% +72%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
57869 Points ∼57% +40%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41434 Points ∼41%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 41744, n=28)
37079 Points ∼37% -11%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
33690 Points ∼33% -19%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3412 MB/s ∼100% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3288 MB/s ∼96%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
3234 MB/s ∼95% -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2906 MB/s ∼85% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 3442, n=28)
2854 MB/s ∼84% -13%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2297 MB/s ∼67% -30%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
102329 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99267 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 99917, n=28)
96767 Points ∼95% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
92064 Points ∼90% -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
87172 Points ∼85% -12%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
52350 Points ∼51% -47%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
12610 Points ∼100% +28%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
10084 Points ∼80% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9852 Points ∼78%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
9634 Points ∼76% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9928, n=28)
9130 Points ∼72% -7%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
5025 Points ∼40% -49%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
55702 Points ∼100% +111%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
36732 Points ∼66% +39%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
29497 Points ∼53% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26379 Points ∼47%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 27390, n=28)
22329 Points ∼40% -15%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
20095 Points ∼36% -24%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
132655 MB/s ∼100% +99%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
76865 MB/s ∼58% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 102398, n=28)
76649 MB/s ∼58% +15%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66712 MB/s ∼50%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
39078 MB/s ∼29% -41%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
36416 MB/s ∼27% -45%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1164 MB/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=28)
989 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
841 MB/s ∼72% -28%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
739 MB/s ∼63% -37%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
709 MB/s ∼61% -39%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
419 MB/s ∼36% -64%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s ∼0% -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
8644 KRay/s ∼100% +58%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
7542 KRay/s ∼87% +37%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
6546 KRay/s ∼76% +19%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
5486 KRay/s ∼63%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 5760, n=28)
4683 KRay/s ∼54% -15%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
4463 KRay/s ∼52% -19%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
33509 MPixel/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 46643, n=28)
32978 MPixel/s ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
25533 MPixel/s ∼76% -24%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
22717 MPixel/s ∼68% -32%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
21992 MPixel/s ∼66% -34%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
20101 MPixel/s ∼60% -40%

System Performance

PCMark 10 results are essentially identical to the FX506 meaning that day-to-day activities won't necessarily feel any faster despite the CPU and GPU upgrades. The Digital Content Creation subtest is noticeably higher, however, likely due to the faster GPU clock rates over the older RTX 3060.

PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
7426 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
7201 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (5986 - 7531, n=5)
7082 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6865 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6088 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5660 Points ∼76% -24%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5447 Points ∼73% -27%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10522 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10499 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (9289 - 11053, n=5)
10380 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10218 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9498 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9378 Points ∼89% -11%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8963 Points ∼85% -15%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10066 Points ∼100% +11%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9298 Points ∼92% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9070 Points ∼90%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8859 Points ∼88% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6161 - 9602, n=5)
8715 Points ∼87% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8485 Points ∼84% -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7012 Points ∼70% -23%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
11672 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (10118 - 11672, n=5)
10721 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
9852 Points ∼84% -16%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9423 Points ∼81% -19%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7831 Points ∼67% -33%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
7023 Points ∼60% -40%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5442 Points ∼47% -53%
PCMark 10 Score
7426 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31252 - 77803, n=28)
55319 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
53661 MB/s ∼97%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
43318 MB/s ∼78% -19%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
38281 MB/s ∼69% -29%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
34742 MB/s ∼63% -35%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
32035 MB/s ∼58% -40%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
59205 MB/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (32677 - 76185, n=28)
58768 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
45841 MB/s ∼77% -23%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
41326 MB/s ∼70% -30%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
39746 MB/s ∼67% -33%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
37556 MB/s ∼63% -37%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
58758 MB/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (30592 - 66475, n=28)
55276 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46062 MB/s ∼78% -22%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
43674 MB/s ∼74% -26%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
39860 MB/s ∼68% -32%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
36920 MB/s ∼63% -37%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Core i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
103 ns * ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
85.3 ns * ∼83%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
61.5 ns * ∼60%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0 - 122, n=29)
58.7 ns * ∼57%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
55.3 ns * ∼54%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latency

LatencyMon reveals DPC issues when opening multiple browser tabs of our homepage. 4K video playback at 60 FPS is otherwise smooth and with no dropped frames.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7107 μs * ∼100% -888%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1431 μs * ∼20% -99%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1380 μs * ∼19% -92%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1122 μs * ∼16% -56%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
995 μs * ∼14% -38%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
719 μs * ∼10%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices — Up To Two M.2 PCIe4 x4 Drives

Our unit ships with the same SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N PCIe3 x4 NVMe SSD as on last year's model. However, do keep in mind that the FX507 supports PCIe4 x4 SSDs meaning end-users can install even faster drives if desired. Performance sustainability may be limited since there is no heat spreader atop of the two M.2 slots.

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 8
CDM 8
Occupied M.2 2280 slot
Occupied M.2 2280 slot
Unoccupied secondary M.2 2280 slot
Unoccupied secondary M.2 2280 slot
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3553 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3011 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 524 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 408.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2492 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2844 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 70.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 217.7 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
95 pt ∼95%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
 
75.5 pt ∼76%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
74.6 pt ∼75%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
67.9 pt ∼68%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
60.8 pt ∼61%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
60.4 pt ∼60%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
37.1 pt ∼37%
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2383 (2361.29min - 2382.94max) MB/s ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2178 (2156.08min - 2177.89max) MB/s ∼91% -9%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2139 (2119.8min - 2138.89max) MB/s ∼90% -10%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1780 - 2383, n=18)
2071 MB/s ∼87% -13%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2011 (1988.53min - 2011.34max) MB/s ∼84% -16%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1800 (1790.74min - 1800.37max) MB/s ∼76% -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1160 (560.08min - 1160.14max) MB/s ∼49% -51%
seq write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2894 (2651.7min - 2893.78max) MB/s ∼100%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1886 - 2909, n=18)
2343 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2124 (2096.94min - 2124.36max) MB/s ∼73% -27%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2084 (2056.68min - 2083.94max) MB/s ∼72% -28%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2045 (2040.32min - 2045.35max) MB/s ∼71% -29%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1886 (1861.48min - 1886.39max) MB/s ∼65% -35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1156 (590.64min - 1155.74max) MB/s ∼40% -60%
seq q8 t1 read
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (3515 - 3607, n=18)
3565 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3554 (3284.35min - 3554.02max) MB/s ∼100%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3546 (2955.48min - 3545.86max) MB/s ∼99% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3539 (3185.08min - 3539.15max) MB/s ∼99% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3429 (3042.13min - 3429.05max) MB/s ∼96% -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2936 (2784.48min - 2936.01max) MB/s ∼82% -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1741 (791.56min - 1740.72max) MB/s ∼49% -51%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3055 (3038.77min - 3055.13max) MB/s ∼100% +6%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (2869 - 3098, n=18)
3014 MB/s ∼99% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3008 (2757.96min - 3007.74max) MB/s ∼98% +5%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3007 (2834.92min - 3006.55max) MB/s ∼98% +5%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2971 (2871.97min - 2970.97max) MB/s ∼97% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2869 (2667.88min - 2869.19max) MB/s ∼94%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1185 (657.19min - 1184.83max) MB/s ∼39% -59%
4k q1 t1 read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
69.4 (68.09min - 69.4max) MB/s ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
65.9 (65.76min - 65.93max) MB/s ∼95% -5%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (32.6 - 70.5, n=18)
56.9 MB/s ∼82% -18%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
44.3 (43.74min - 44.26max) MB/s ∼64% -36%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
43.8 (42.89min - 43.76max) MB/s ∼63% -37%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
43.6 (43.42min - 43.62max) MB/s ∼63% -37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
23.3 (23.23min - 23.32max) MB/s ∼34% -66%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
211 (210.13min - 210.73max) MB/s ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
169 (168.56min - 169.29max) MB/s ∼80% -20%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (81.2 - 216, n=18)
153.8 MB/s ∼73% -27%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
138 (137.2min - 137.78max) MB/s ∼65% -35%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
124 (122.95min - 124.14max) MB/s ∼59% -41%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
105 (104.84min - 105.22max) MB/s ∼50% -50%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
92.1 (88.26min - 92.08max) MB/s ∼44% -56%
4k q32 t16 read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2217 (2210.73min - 2217.07max) MB/s ∼100%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (628 - 2217, n=18)
1337 MB/s ∼60% -40%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
778 (773.96min - 777.56max) MB/s ∼35% -65%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
725 (711.04min - 724.91max) MB/s ∼33% -67%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
598 (576.48min - 598.01max) MB/s ∼27% -73%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
544 (534.67min - 543.92max) MB/s ∼25% -75%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439 (211.56min - 439max) MB/s ∼20% -80%
4k q32 t16 write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2314 (2299.73min - 2313.93max) MB/s ∼100%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (394 - 2341, n=18)
883 MB/s ∼38% -62%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
618 (524.5min - 618max) MB/s ∼27% -73%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
419 (388.98min - 418.91max) MB/s ∼18% -82%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
416 (408.24min - 415.63max) MB/s ∼18% -82%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
392 (381.24min - 391.52max) MB/s ∼17% -83%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
305 (285.51min - 305max) MB/s ∼13% -87%
AS SSD
Score Total
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6117 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
4881 Points ∼80% -20%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
4869 Points ∼80% -20%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (3615 - 6117, n=15)
4797 Points ∼78% -22%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
4105 Points ∼67% -33%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4092 Points ∼67% -33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1814 Points ∼30% -70%
Score Read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2291 Points ∼100%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1221 - 2291, n=15)
1706 Points ∼74% -26%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1597 Points ∼70% -30%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1516 Points ∼66% -34%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1301 Points ∼57% -43%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1292 Points ∼56% -44%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
637 Points ∼28% -72%
Score Write
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3011 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2660 Points ∼88%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2508 Points ∼83% -6%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1638 - 2660, n=15)
2258 Points ∼75% -15%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2151 Points ∼71% -19%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1869 Points ∼62% -30%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
882 Points ∼29% -67%
Seq Read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3013 MB/s ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2873 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (2635 - 3133, n=15)
2839 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2714 MB/s ∼90% -10%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2671 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1938 MB/s ∼64% -36%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1757 MB/s ∼58% -42%
Seq Write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2768 MB/s ∼100%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1243 - 2969, n=15)
1917 MB/s ∼69% -31%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1619 MB/s ∼58% -42%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1501 MB/s ∼54% -46%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1248 MB/s ∼45% -55%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1071 MB/s ∼39% -61%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
928 MB/s ∼34% -66%
4K Read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
66.9 MB/s ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
57.5 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (28.8 - 66.9, n=15)
53 MB/s ∼79% -21%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
47.35 MB/s ∼71% -29%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
42.83 MB/s ∼64% -36%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
39.65 MB/s ∼59% -41%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
22.07 MB/s ∼33% -67%
4K Write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
184.8 MB/s ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
149.6 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (59 - 184.8, n=15)
127.3 MB/s ∼69% -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
124.2 MB/s ∼67% -33%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
120.5 MB/s ∼65% -35%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
93.7 MB/s ∼51% -49%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
69 MB/s ∼37% -63%
4K-64 Read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1923 MB/s ∼100%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (873 - 1923, n=15)
1369 MB/s ∼71% -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1252 MB/s ∼65% -35%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1209 MB/s ∼63% -37%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1060 MB/s ∼55% -45%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
978 MB/s ∼51% -49%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439.4 MB/s ∼23% -77%
4K-64 Write
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2797 MB/s ∼100% +27%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2198 MB/s ∼79%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2196 MB/s ∼79% 0%
Average SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
  (1342 - 2216, n=15)