Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo 15 OLED Laptop Review: Perfect for Content Creators?

More performance than most workstations. The new ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 is once again equipped with a secondary display, which is a great addition for content creators. Thanks to the very high performance, however, the laptop is also interesting for other user groups and even surpasses many mobile workstations.
Andreas Osthoff 👁 (translated by Andreas Osthoff), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

We are already familiar with the principle of two displays from Asus for a couple of years now and the new ZenBook Pro Duo 15 improves many details. We review the model UX582 LR with a 4K OLED display, Core i7 processor, 32 GB RAM, a 1 TB SSD, and the fast graphics card GeForce RTX 3070. Thanks to the secondary screen, the laptop is obviously very interesting for editing pictures/videos because you can use tools or folders on the lower screen. However, you could also classify it as a mobile workstation if you do not need a professional GPU with certified drivers. Some major manufacturers like HP also started offering their workstations with regular GeForce GPUs in case yo do not need a more expensive Quadro model.

If you do not need the high performance and prefer a more compact laptop with a secondary screen instead, you should have a look at the 14-inch ZenBook Duo 14 UX482.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 (ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10870H 8 x 2.2 - 5 GHz, 107 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8192 MB, Core: 1463 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 110 W TDP + 25 W Dynamic Boost, 466.27, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2933, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Capacitive, SDC4143, OLED + IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM470
Storage
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, 890 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Stereo
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21.5 x 359.8 x 249.2 ( = 0.85 x 14.17 x 9.81 in)
Battery
92 Wh, 5810 mAh Lithium-Ion, 8 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p + IR
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 240W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.4 kg ( = 84.66 oz / 5.29 pounds), Power Supply: 712 g ( = 25.12 oz / 1.57 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85.4 %
06/2021
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.5 mm15.60"3840x2160
90.6 %
03/2021
HP ZBook Studio G7
i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
2 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2160
90.2 %
01/2021
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
2.4 kg25.9 mm15.60"3840x2160
85.6 %
03/2021
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg20 mm15.60"3840x2160
85.4 %
04/2021
Alienware m15 R4
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm15.60"1920x1080

Case - Asus implements an additional hinge

Looking at it from the outside, the new model of the ZenBook Pro Duo has not changed lot. The design with the angles, colors and materials is pretty much identical to the predecessor. We like the look of the laptop and it also appears to be thinner than it really is thanks to the tapered base unit. The lid with the characteristic concentric circles is once again very prone to fingerprints.

The hinge mechanism for the secondary display is very solid.
The hinge mechanism for the secondary display is very solid.

The biggest new feature is the additional hinge mechanism for the secondary display, so it is now slightly tilted towards the user. This happen automatically; at a certain opening angle of the lid (around 70 degrees), the secondary display is slightly raised (9.5 degrees). The mechanism looks a bit fragile on pictures, but it turns out to be very solid and sturdy. The overall stability of the chassis is very good in general and there are no creaking noises.

The second display is raised when...
The second display is raised when...
...the lid passes a certain angle.
...the lid passes a certain angle.

The position of the fan opening changed a bit. There are still two large openings at the sides, but instead of the upper edge of the secondary screen, there are now fan exhausts at the rear of the base unit itself. A maintenance hatch is not included, but the bottom panel can be removed quite easily (more on that later).

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Compared to the old model, the chassis dimensions changed slightly; the new UX582 is a bit deeper, but also a bit thinner in return. Its weight of 2.4 kg is comparable to full-fledged workstations like the HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 or the gaming laptop Alienware m15 R4, but the footprint is comparatively compact.

Size Comparison

359 mm / 14.1 inch 246 mm / 9.69 inch 24 mm / 0.945 inch 2.5 kg5.51 lbs357 mm / 14.1 inch 242.5 mm / 9.55 inch 25.9 mm / 1.02 inch 2.4 kg5.37 lbs359.8 mm / 14.2 inch 249.2 mm / 9.81 inch 21.5 mm / 0.846 inch 2.4 kg5.29 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 276 mm / 10.9 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2.3 kg5.07 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 250 mm / 9.84 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2.2 kg4.92 lbs354 mm / 13.9 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 2 kg4.31 lbs

Connectivity - Asus with 2x Thunderbolt 3

All the ports are distributed across the sides, but there is not that much space due to the large fan exhausts. Compared to the old model, Asus removed the regular USB-A port on the left and added a second USB-C connector on the right side. This means all the USB ports are on the right side and the position is not ideal, either. All in all, there are not that many ports considering the size of the chassis. Charging via USB-C is not supported and the repeated lack of a card reader surprises us (the smaller ZenBook Duo 14 has a card reader).

Right side: 2x USB-C w /Thunderbolt 3, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1
Right side: 2x USB-C w /Thunderbolt 3, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1
Left side: Power, HDMI 2.1, 3.5 mm Stereo
Left side: Power, HDMI 2.1, 3.5 mm Stereo

Communication

The Wi-Fi module is now onboard.
The Wi-Fi module is now onboard.

Asus replaced the Intel AX200 module from the previous model with the newer AX201 module and it is now soldered to the mainboard, so it is no longer replaceable. The transfer rates in our standardized test with the router Netgear Nighthawk RAX 120 are very good and we did not notice any connection issues, neither with the router from Netgear, nor the Fritz!Box 7590.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w
1540 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1394 (497min - 1498max) MBit/s ∼91%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1312 (682min - 1432max) MBit/s ∼85% -6%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=270)
1157 MBit/s ∼75% -17%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1090 MBit/s ∼71% -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (52 - 1563, n=80, last 2 years)
1004 MBit/s ∼65% -28%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
843 (792min - 896max) MBit/s ∼55% -40%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
624 (614min - 632max) MBit/s ∼41% -55%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w
1720 MBit/s ∼100% +34%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1553 (1260min - 1648max) MBit/s ∼90% +21%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1285 (728min - 1461max) MBit/s ∼75%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=270)
1247 MBit/s ∼73% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 1548, n=80, last 2 years)
1081 MBit/s ∼63% -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1080 MBit/s ∼63% -16%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
876 (448min - 896max) MBit/s ∼51% -32%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
685 (607min - 721max) MBit/s ∼40% -47%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501321129913371283138312521190118411981080115712461294125711381335137914411376143814291398143614121373146114101409902728132112991337128313831252119011841198108011571246129412571138133513791441137614381429139814361412137314611410140990272849713581385134513601480148514791498148614711489147314431443132614811439145714041329131313641373127112801411140913551407Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1285 (728-1461)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1377 (497-1498)

Webcam

ColorChecker
22.1 ∆E
22 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2: 15.61 ∆E min: 2.54 - max: 23.18 ∆E

Maintenance

The bottom panel is secured by multiple Philips screws, but the three screws in the center are covered with a small glued pad. There is not much to do once you are inside, because almost all components (including RAM) are soldered onto the mainboard and you can only clean the fan or replace the M.2-SSD.

Internal layout
Internal layout

Input Devices - ZenBook with 1,4 mm key travel

In addition to the touchscreens, you can obviously also use the keyboard and the touchpad for inputs, and they are identical to the predecessor. The typing experience is very comfortable and the key travel is not too shallow at 1.4 mm. The keyboard is illuminated and easy to use in darker environments. Due to the lack of a palm rest, you will need more space on the desk to type comfortable. This might be an issue when room is limited (on the train, for example), but the ZenBook Pro Duo 15 is not the most portable device in the first place.

The touchpad on the right side is easy to use and inputs are executed reliably, but it is very narrow, so you have to lift and reposition your fingers quite often. You can also use the touchpad as a numpad.

Input devices
Input devices
Keyboard illumination and numpad
Keyboard illumination and numpad

Display - 4K OLED Touchscreen from Samsung

Subpixel array
Subpixel array

The 4K touchscreen is once again provided by Samsung, but the panel ID has changed. As per usual for OLEDs, we can detect PWM at 60 Hz when the brightness is at 81% or lower. If you have problems with PWM flickering (probably also on smartphones) you have to expect limitations.

The subjective picture quality is very good thanks to the excellent contrast ratio and images look very crisp. The fast response times are another advantage of the OLED screen and there is no backlight bleeding, either.

Asus implements a tool called OLED Care with several to ensure that static images are not shown to long and do not burn in into display. In addition to shifting pixels, it can also automatically fade out the Windows task bar.

326
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
345
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
SDC4143
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 354 cd/m² Average: 331.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 345 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 2.6
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
89.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.91% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.01
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
SDC4143, OLED + IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
HP ZBook Studio G7
LGD0661, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
LG Philips LGD0661, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Alienware m15 R4
LG Philips LGD066E, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Display
-5%
-6%
-0%
-20%
-29%
Display P3 Coverage
99.91
98.21
-2%
95.55
-4%
99.92
0%
69.38
-31%
63.52
-36%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.92
0%
99.79
0%
100
0%
99
-1%
81.03
-19%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
99.65
86.51
-13%
84.47
-15%
98.53
-1%
70.5
-29%
67.3
-32%
Response Times
-1859%
-1817%
109%
-263%
101%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
56.4 ?(27.6, 28.8)
-2250%
56 ?(27.6, 28.4)
-2233%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
-0%
7.4 ?(2, 5.2)
-208%
2.2 ?(1, 1.2)
8%
Response Time Black / White *
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
37.6 ?(19.6, 18)
-1467%
36 ?(20.4, 15.6)
-1400%
1.8 ?(1, 0.8)
25%
10 ?(4.4, 5.6)
-317%
2.6 ?(1, 1.6)
-8%
PWM Frequency
59.52 ?(81)
240 ?(79)
303%
240.4 ?(52)
304%
Screen
46%
8%
16%
12%
-16%
Brightness middle
345
723
110%
672.8
95%
442
28%
333
-3%
359.7
4%
Brightness
332
707
113%
674
103%
452
36%
303
-9%
366
10%
Brightness Distribution
87
92
6%
89
2%
95
9%
86
-1%
94
8%
Black Level *
0.35
0.5
0.05
0.29
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.3
1.4
58%
3.48
-5%
2.69
18%
1.8
45%
5.14
-56%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.2
2.9
60%
9.44
-31%
8.27
-15%
4.49
38%
7.77
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.6
0.5
81%
3.03
-17%
2.59
-0%
1.13
57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
2
-0%
3.1
-55%
0.9
55%
1.9
5%
2.7
-35%
Gamma
2.01 109%
2.14 103%
2.04 108%
2.172 101%
2.265 97%
2 110%
CCT
6566 99%
6484 100%
6380 102%
6434 101%
6840 95%
6220 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
89.2
77.3
-13%
75.2
-16%
99
11%
71
-20%
61.8
-31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99.9
0%
100
0%
100
0%
93
-7%
81.3
-19%
Contrast
2066
1346
8840
1148
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-606% / -237%
-605% / -255%
42% / 31%
-90% / -34%
19% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

Asus advertises a brightness of 440 cd/m², but our test unit only manages a maximum brightness of 348 cd/m². The picture impression is still very good, which is mainly a result of the extremely high contrast ratio since the black value is 0. The brightness is not reduced on battery power if you disable the adaptive brightness in Intel’s graphics drivers.

CalMAN Grayscale (target color space P3)
CalMAN Grayscale (target color space P3)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps (target color space P3)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps (target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (target color space P3)
CalMAN Grayscale calibrated (target color space P3)
CalMAN Grayscale calibrated (target color space P3)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps calibrated (target color space P3)
CalMAN Saturation Sweeps calibrated (target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated (target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker calibrated (target color space P3)

The calibration out of the box is not bad and there is no color cast, but some colors deviate from the target value (<3), and we cannot completely correct this with our own calibration (CalMAN & X-Rite i1 Pro 2), either. This means the panel is not perfect for picture or video editing, even though the P3 color space is covered completely. We would have also liked to see an additional color profile if you want to edit sRGB images. Mobile workstations with 4K panels usually have an advantage in this respect.

vs. sRGB: 100% (Argyll 3D comparison)
vs. sRGB: 100% (Argyll 3D comparison)
vs. AdobeRGB: 89.2% (Argyll 3D comparison)
vs. AdobeRGB: 89.2% (Argyll 3D comparison)
vs. P3: 99.5% (CalMAN 2D comparison)
vs. P3: 99.5% (CalMAN 2D comparison)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 59.52 Hz ≤ 81 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 59.52 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 81 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 59.52 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17043 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

The OLED touchscreen is very glossy, and you should avoid reflections from light sources or bright surfaces both indoors and outdoors. You can still see the display contents pretty comfortably on bright days thanks to the high contrast ratio. The viewing angle stability is very good, but we can once again notice color shifts from extreme angles, which are typical for OLED panels. However, we do not think this will be an issue in practice.

In the sun
In the sun
In the sun
In the sun
Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

ScreenPad Plus - Matte IPS Touchscreen

The secondary display is also useful for benchmarks.
The secondary display is also useful for benchmarks.

Asus calls the additional display ScreenPad Plus. The horizontal resolution is, similar to the main display, 3840 pixels, but only 1100 pixels vertically. It is an IPS screen, but the subjective picture quality is noticeably worse compared to the OLED screen. This is mainly caused by the thick matte layer, which results in a very grainy picture. It is fine for tool bars, Windows folders or checking mails, but the panel is hardly suited for media playback.

If you can really utilize the additional display obviously depends on your usage scenarios, but Asus certainly did a good job in terms of implementation. You can move folders or apps manually to the lower screen, but there is also a button above the touchpad where you can comfortable switch the active window between the screens. There is another button to quickly activate/deactivate the ScreenPad.

There is a tool bar at the left side of the ScreenPad with settings for the brightness and additional apps like a numeric keypad, hand-writing recognition (including pen support) or Spotify, for example.

Performance - ZenBook Pro Duo with additional Performance mode Leistungsmodus

The ZenBook Pro Duo offers two different performance settings, which can be selected via Asus app or comfortably with a button on the keyboard. The Asus app also includes a diagram that illustrates the differences, but we noticed that the graphics performance is also affected.

Standard mode
Standard mode
Performance mode
Performance mode

We performed all the following measurements and benchmarks with the performance mode, but we will also have a look at the differences in some sections. We included the TDP values for the components in the following table.

Standard Performance
CPU 80/46 Watts 107/70 Watts
GPU 85 Watts 110 Watts
combined load 40W CPU & 80W GPU 68W CPU & 90W GPU

Processor - Core i7-10870H

The processor is a fats Core i7-10870H from Intel (Comet lake) with 8 cores and a maximum clock of 5 GHz for one core or up to 4.2 GHz for eight active cores, respectively. Please see our tech section for more information on this particular CPU. The performance utilization is very good thanks to the increased TDP limits, and the i7 can even keep up with the Core i9 models from the competition.

090180270360450540630720810900990108011701260135014401530162017101622.321559.091583.281586.171585.161576.421579.161586.171593.051551.591587.111585.231566.721583.221577.411581.221564.821563.911584.221592.11585.161562.931586.171589.131565.81564.21512.521465.421391.641450.171451.011338.21332.841381.641499.71450.481356.711339.091339.321458.421408.31323.671343.591334.711339.091336.851325.031338.691330.541343.141726.441647.181619.831608.751592.611574.81599.681591.531578.781598.471597.571588.691581.651593.561597.381597.571583.661599.621579.651604.431592.611592.551582.721596.621590.581628.271577.61590.011578.411581.281591.791586.731570.661573.071573.941576.61583.971566.911579.591571.651569.861580.471583.971566.481561.521562.191558.851580.781566.421578.781562.991569.31571.221563.051567.091571.831578.531560.311567.891580.721577.911581.41566.351571.961570.781573.191567.581577.471570.231552.671554.121559.941562.51572.331566.351047.231058.431070.691080.031081.021079.391084.451088.611083.481086.721078.811083.161076.921076.171084.921086.191065.811083.751081.841085.981078.551074.551078.341082.91082.221080.611075.791079.041078.781078.021081.961078.951083.481080.671082.61082.131079.11088.671075.11074.661077.851082.871088.491082.661081.081071.211075.851077.731079.911081.141701.111559.331468.591473.681455.291478.421484.781480.991473.681473.681473.681492.591489.151495.221484.781491.761480.931473.681474.551463.591479.671477.921482.21461.081479.181591.411606.361600.381556.61577.721602.371571.891581.591591.471588.51569.921576.731580.591558.481552.81539.761564.211545.361580.651556.61546.311550.931516.071501.781554.671689.971626.351569.181573.071570.041556.781526.781527.31549.731575.491568.811570.781573.941576.351571.41573.321567.461573.3815741571.41574.871572.641571.831567.341571.41572.081572.821573.321576.231576.171573.51573.691567.951571.281570.721575.981572.141572.331565.991572.571570.781572.141571.961566.051574.371570.411567.891578.281577.541567.89Tooltip
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 Intel Core i7-10870H; Performance Mode: Ø1580 (1551.59-1622.32)
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2 Intel Core i7-10870H; Standard Mode: Ø1390 (1323.67-1564.2)
HP ZBook Studio G7 Intel Core i9-10885H: Ø1601 (1574.8-1726.44)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Intel Xeon W-10885M: Ø1573 (1552.67-1628.27)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Intel Xeon W-10885M: Ø1079 (1047.23-1088.67)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1490 (1455.29-1701.11)
Alienware m15 R4 Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1567 (1501.78-1606.36)
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1573 (1526.78-1689.97)

The analysis of the CPU data during the Cinebench R15 Multi loop illustrates that the TDP values stabilize at the intended values (70 or 46W) after a short while and are sometimes even higher. This is a great result and you can just use the standard mode in everyday situations because the performance is not that much lower. We notice a performance deficit of roughly 20% on battery power (TDP is limited to 49W in both performance modes).

CPU data Cinebench R15 Multi loop (Red: Performance, Green: Standard)
CPU data Cinebench R15 Multi loop (Red: Performance, Green: Standard)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (980 - 1556, n=48, last 2 years)
1328 Points ∼100% +8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1300 Points ∼98% +5%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
1295 Points ∼98% +5%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
1235 Points ∼93%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1234 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1177 - 1253, n=12)
1223 Points ∼92% -1%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
10095 Points ∼100%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
10074 Points ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
9633 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (8250 - 10450, n=12)
9594 Points ∼95% -5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
6893 (6336.38min - 6892.81max) Points ∼68% -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2725 - 13205, n=54, last 2 years)
6604 Points ∼65% -35%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
513 Points ∼100% +8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
502 Points ∼98% +5%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
499 Points ∼97% +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (311 - 601, n=93, last 2 years)
486 Points ∼95% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
482 Points ∼94% +1%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
477 Points ∼93% 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
476 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (460 - 484, n=12)
474 Points ∼92% 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK
446 Points ∼87% -6%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3915 Points ∼100% +3%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
3835 Points ∼98% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
2727 Points ∼70% -28%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
3806 Points ∼97%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
3762 Points ∼96% -1%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK
3705 Points ∼95% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (3027 - 4020, n=12)
3588 Points ∼92% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
3543 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (727 - 5128, n=93, last 2 years)
2292 Points ∼59% -40%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
212 Points ∼100% +7%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
211 Points ∼100% +6%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
209 Points ∼99% +5%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
202 Points ∼95% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
200 Points ∼94% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (196 - 204, n=11)
200 Points ∼94% +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
199 Points ∼94%
Average of class Multimedia
  (126 - 240, n=91, last 2 years)
191 Points ∼90% -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK
190 Points ∼90% -5%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
1726 (1574.8min - 1726.44max) Points ∼100% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1701 (1455.29min - 1701.11max) Points ∼99% +5%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1641 Points ∼95% +1%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1628 (1552.67min - 1628.27max) Points ∼94% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1089 (1047.23min - 1088.67max) Points ∼63% -33%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
1622 (1551.59min - 1622.32max) Points ∼94%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
1564 (1325min - 1564max) Points ∼91% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1336 - 1740, n=14)
1614 Points ∼94% 0%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1606 (1501.78min - 1606.36max) Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (334 - 2154, n=104, last 2 years)
1011 Points ∼59% -38%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (233 - 1439, n=80, last 2 years)
548 Seconds * ∼100% -93%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
412 Seconds * ∼75% -45%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
308 Seconds * ∼56% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (272 - 333, n=12)
298 Seconds * ∼54% -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
284 Seconds * ∼52%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
283 Seconds * ∼52% -0%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
279 Seconds * ∼51% +2%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
5703 MIPS ∼100% +11%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
5668 MIPS ∼99% +10%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5437 MIPS ∼95% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
5294 MIPS ∼93% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (5145 - 5429, n=12)
5293 MIPS ∼93% +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
5145 MIPS ∼90%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3406 - 5777, n=79, last 2 years)
4928 MIPS ∼86% -4%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48838 MIPS ∼100% +9%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
44771 MIPS ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (39581 - 46708, n=12)
44452 MIPS ∼91% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
43601 MIPS ∼89% -3%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
42993 MIPS ∼88% -4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
36204 MIPS ∼74% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8984 - 59653, n=79, last 2 years)
28470 MIPS ∼58% -36%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
1376 Points ∼100% +8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1340 Points ∼97% +5%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1316 Points ∼96% +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (813 - 1645, n=76, last 2 years)
1314 Points ∼95% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
1295 Points ∼94% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1191 - 1295, n=12)
1273 Points ∼93% 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
1272 Points ∼92%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7789 Points ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
7716 Points ∼99% +1%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
7693 Points ∼99% +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
7602 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (6403 - 7882, n=12)
7482 Points ∼96% -2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
6948 Points ∼89% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1604 - 9050, n=76, last 2 years)
5267 Points ∼68% -31%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13.1 fps ∼100% +5%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
12.5 fps ∼95% 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
12.5 fps ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (10.7 - 13.5, n=12)
12.2 fps ∼93% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
11.7 fps ∼89% -6%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
8.89 fps ∼68% -29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 15.9, n=77, last 2 years)
7.63 fps ∼58% -39%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
64.4 s * ∼100% -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
60.6 s * ∼94%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
59.6 s * ∼93% +2%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
58.1 s * ∼90% +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.5 - 99.2, n=79, last 2 years)
54.7 s * ∼85% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (46 - 64.4, n=12)
53.7 s * ∼83% +11%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
49.3 s * ∼77% +19%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.4998 - 1.002, n=79, last 2 years)
0.628 sec * ∼100% -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.614 sec * ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (0.573 - 0.614, n=12)
0.591 sec * ∼94% +4%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.578 sec * ∼92% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.573 sec * ∼91% +7%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H
0.564 sec * ∼90% +8%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M
0.551 sec * ∼88% +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1564 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
126 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
199 Points
Help

System Performance

As expected, the system performance of the ZenBook Pro Duo is very high and it is just a very responsive device, which is confirmed by the high scores in the synthetic benchmark tests.

PCMark 10
Score
Alienware m15 R4
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
6640 Points ∼100% +17%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6442 Points ∼97% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (5660 - 6630, n=8)
6230 Points ∼94% +10%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5733 Points ∼86% +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5660 Points ∼85%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5654 Points ∼85% 0%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
5324 Points ∼80% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3028 - 6725, n=85, last 2 years)
4872 Points ∼73% -14%
Essentials
Alienware m15 R4
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
9577 Points ∼100% +7%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9530 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9524 Points ∼99% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9185 Points ∼96% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (8609 - 9518, n=8)
9120 Points ∼95% +2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6441 - 10539, n=84, last 2 years)
9044 Points ∼94% +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8963 Points ∼94%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
8704 Points ∼91% -3%
Productivity
Alienware m15 R4
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
8605 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7012 - 8741, n=8)
8032 Points ∼93% +15%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7916 Points ∼92% +13%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7485 Points ∼87% +7%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7384 Points ∼86% +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5448 - 9662, n=84, last 2 years)
7316 Points ∼85% +4%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
7080 Points ∼82% +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7012 Points ∼81%
Digital Content Creation
Alienware m15 R4
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
9643 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7831 - 10130, n=8)
8816 Points ∼91% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8663 Points ∼90% +11%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7831 Points ∼81%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7269 Points ∼75% -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6880 Points ∼71% -12%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
6646 Points ∼69% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2148 - 9415, n=84, last 2 years)
4860 Points ∼50% -38%
PCMark 10 Score
5660 points
Help

DPC Latency

Our standardized latency test (web browsing, 4K video, CPU load) shows no limitations for test device, which means it has an advantage over the other competitors. We only noticed a couple of dropped frames during the playback of a 4K YouTube video (10 out of 3683).

LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Drivers
LatencyMon Drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP ZBook Studio G7
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
5474.8 μs * ∼100% -450%
Alienware m15 R4
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-10980HK, Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
4199.3 μs * ∼77% -322%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3260.4 μs * ∼60% -228%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2029 μs * ∼37% -104%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
995.2 μs * ∼18%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

The M.2 2280 SSD can be replaced.
The M.2 2280 SSD can be replaced.

The M.2-2280-SSD is attached via PCIe-3.0 x4 and not the latest (and faster) PCIe 4.0 interface. Our test unit is equipped with a 1 TB (890 GB usable space) NVMe-SSD from Samsung (PM981a) that manages good transfer rates and there is no reason to change the drive. More SSD benchmarks are available here.

Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
HP ZBook Studio G7
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Alienware m15 R4
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
18%
34%
35%
41%
9%
32%
Write 4K
102.85
95.54
-7%
114.1
11%
126.04
23%
93.68
-9%
104
1%
140 ?(76.2 - 229, n=35)
36%
Read 4K
51.89
48.99
-6%
57.18
10%
44.94
-13%
48.1
-7%
41.12
-21%
49.9 ?(34.3 - 75.5, n=35)
-4%
Write Seq
1625.29
2001.28
23%
2580
59%
2763.28
70%
2785
71%
1898
17%
2011 ?(776 - 2975, n=34)
24%
Read Seq
1719.75
1600.15
-7%
2527
47%
1671.41
-3%
2598
51%
1618
-6%
1999 ?(973 - 2639, n=34)
16%
Write 4K Q32T1
313.35
410.24
31%
480.2
53%
451.63
44%
481.9
54%
408.7
30%
462 ?(268 - 656, n=35)
47%
Read 4K Q32T1
329.41
394.7
20%
387.6
18%
551.91
68%
520.9
58%
358.5
9%
497 ?(289 - 730, n=35)
51%
Write Seq Q32T1
1603.6
3147.8
96%
2996
87%
3059.7
91%
3362
110%
2397
49%
2900 ?(788 - 3033, n=35)
81%
Read Seq Q32T1
3321
3226.8
-3%
2853
-14%
3191.5
-4%
3200
-4%
3158
-5%
3477 ?(2853 - 3568, n=35)
5%
AS SSD
-16%
-10%
16%
2%
-12%
13%
Seq Read
1938
2548
31%
2127.46
10%
2331
20%
2658.01
37%
1408.99
-27%
2529 ?(1938 - 3066, n=35)
30%
Seq Write
1248
1312
5%
1295.71
4%
2312
85%
2768.84
122%
1316.23
5%
2051 ?(1248 - 2837, n=35)
64%
4K Read
47.35
45.38
-4%
54.84
16%
39.13
-17%
46.07
-3%
44.99
-5%
53.2 ?(44.3 - 68.4, n=35)
12%
4K Write
93.7
83.04
-11%
110.83
18%
98.12
5%
87.16
-7%
93.04
-1%
131 ?(87.4 - 208, n=35)
40%
4K-64 Read
1059.8
934.65
-12%
1419.72
34%
1662.54
57%
1372.43
29%
1092.42
3%
1458 ?(762 - 2093, n=35)
38%
4K-64 Write
1932.35
2314.13
20%
2012.49
4%
2138.19
11%
1247.32
-35%
1809.77
-6%
1797 ?(1074 - 2152, n=35)
-7%
Access Time Read *
0.061
0.057
7%
0.046
25%
0.099
-62%
0.052
15%
0.041
33%
0.0491 ?(0.032 - 0.087, n=34)
20%
Access Time Write *
0.04
0.098
-145%
0.099
-148%
0.038
5%
0.098
-145%
0.118
-195%
0.0431 ?(0.017 - 0.128, n=35)
-8%
Score Read
1301
1235
-5%
1687
30%
1935
49%
1684
29%
1278
-2%
1764 ?(1078 - 2449, n=35)
36%
Score Write
2151
2528
18%
2253
5%
2468
15%
1611
-25%
2034
-5%
2133 ?(1471 - 2527, n=35)
-1%
Score Total
4092
4342
6%
4770
17%
5388
32%
4166
2%
3970
-3%
4782 ?(3309 - 6095, n=35)
17%
Copy ISO MB/s
2840.81
3141.98
11%
2779.26
-2%
2903
2%
2111.62
-26%
2090 ?(901 - 2932, n=22)
-26%
Copy Program MB/s
613.22
126.06
-79%
123.31
-80%
686
12%
874.26
43%
508 ?(119 - 803, n=22)
-17%
Copy Game MB/s
1390.76
477.36
-66%
440.8
-68%
1594
15%
1676.98
21%
1141 ?(372 - 1830, n=22)
-18%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / -4%
12% / 6%
26% / 23%
22% / 18%
-2% / -4%
23% / 20%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3321 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1603.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 329.41 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 313.35 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1719.75 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1625.29 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.89 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 102.85 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

015030045060075090010501200135015001650180019502100225024002550270028502570.692589.212602.182647.392652.422666.022674.812682.352684.862691.972692.812693.442695.952699.32701.762706.832710.182710.782716.462726.32728.62730.912732.372739.272752.882817.552840.362842.042842.672853.762859.412860.882861.082861.142863.62864.082867.362869.882874.692876.362878.672881.62884.532885.572890.182906.022906.52911.942912.572933.29Tooltip
: Ø2781 (2570.69-2933.29)

GPU Performance - RTX 3070 with 110W Dynamic Boost

GPU-Z Intel UHD Graphics
GPU-Z Intel UHD Graphics
GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070

Simple workloads are handled by the efficient UHD Graphics of the processor, but the dedicated Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 will automatically take over when you need more power. The standard mode has a TGP of 85W and 110W (up to 1463 MHz) in performance mode. The graphics performance of the previous model with the RTX 2060 is easily surpassed (+40-60% depending on the test) and the performance is stable during longer workloads. Running on battery will limit the TGP to 55W, so the graphics performance drops by around 50%.

The RTX 3070 also performs well in professional benchmarks. Quadro GPUs with special drivers still have advantages in some areas, but the RTX 3070 can even beat the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q of the HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 in some scenarios.

Standard Performance
TGP 85 Watts 110 Watts
GPU clock up to 1155 MHz up to 1463 MHz
Time Spy GPU 7518 points 9060 points
Time Spy Stress Test 96.3% 98.4%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Alienware m15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-10980HK
37287 Points ∼100% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (20039 - 38275, n=32)
32932 Points ∼88% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
31866 Points ∼85% 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
31788 Points ∼85%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
26369 Points ∼71% -17%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
19666 Points ∼53% -38%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
17523 Points ∼47% -45%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1365 - 31866, n=83, last 2 years)
9394 Points ∼25% -70%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Alienware m15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-10980HK
27977 Points ∼100% +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (16628 - 29128, n=31)
24415 Points ∼87% +15%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
23674 Points ∼85% +12%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
21178 Points ∼76%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
19759 Points ∼71% -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
14768 Points ∼53% -30%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
13617 Points ∼49% -36%
Average of class Multimedia
  (920 - 23674, n=91, last 2 years)
6724 Points ∼24% -68%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Alienware m15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-10980HK
11019 Points ∼100% +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (6059 - 11019, n=32)
9388 Points ∼85% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
9323 Points ∼85% +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
9060 Points ∼82%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
7443 Points ∼68% -18%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i9-9980HK
5738 Points ∼52% -37%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
5048 Points ∼46% -44%
Average of class Multimedia
  (300 - 9323, n=80, last 2 years)
2370 Points ∼22% -74%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
142.63 fps ∼100% +81%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
126.69 fps ∼89% +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (78.8 - 92.3, n=3)
87.6 fps ∼61% +11%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
78.8 fps ∼55%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.7 - 92.3, n=7, last 2 years)
66.4 fps ∼47% -16%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
285.08 fps ∼100% +1408%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
195.8 fps ∼69% +936%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.76 - 157, n=7, last 2 years)
38.9 fps ∼14% +106%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
18.9 fps ∼7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (17.4 - 18.9, n=3)
18.4 fps ∼6% -3%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (100 - 114, n=3)
107 fps ∼100% +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
106 fps ∼99%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
95.67 fps ∼89% -10%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
71.53 fps ∼67% -33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21.7 - 106, n=7, last 2 years)
57.2 fps ∼53% -46%
Medical (medical-02)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
90.77 fps ∼100% +51%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
69.54 fps ∼77% +15%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
60.3 fps ∼66%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (56.8 - 60.7, n=3)
59.3 fps ∼65% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.47 - 60.3, n=7, last 2 years)
29.9 fps ∼33% -50%
Maya (maya-05)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (186 - 232, n=3)
206 fps ∼100% +11%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
200.49 fps ∼97% +8%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
186 fps ∼90%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
160.77 fps ∼78% -14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (40.4 - 210, n=7, last 2 years)
120 fps ∼58% -35%
Energy (energy-02)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
39.92 fps ∼100% +76%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
27.08 fps ∼68% +19%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
22.7 fps ∼57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (21.2 - 22.7, n=3)
22.2 fps ∼56% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.02 - 22.7, n=7, last 2 years)
11.5 fps ∼29% -49%
Creo (creo-02)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
223.14 fps ∼100% +56%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
168.28 fps ∼75% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (143 - 169, n=3)
156 fps ∼70% +9%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
143 fps ∼64%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.38 - 170, n=7, last 2 years)
81.3 fps ∼36% -43%
Catia (catia-05)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
225.34 fps ∼100% +79%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
194.77 fps ∼86% +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (126 - 133, n=3)
129 fps ∼57% +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
126 fps ∼56%
Average of class Multimedia
  (61 - 132, n=7, last 2 years)
104 fps ∼46% -17%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
176.8 fps ∼100% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (151 - 193, n=3)
174 fps ∼98% +15%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
151 fps ∼85%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
134.63 fps ∼76% -11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (37.9 - 177, n=7, last 2 years)
90.8 fps ∼51% -40%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (130 - 176, n=2)
153 fps ∼100% +18%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
130 fps ∼85%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
130 fps ∼85% 0%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
93.8 fps ∼61% -28%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
184 fps ∼100% +884%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
18.7 fps ∼10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
18.7 fps ∼10% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (17 - 18.7, n=2)
17.9 fps ∼10% -4%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
33.9 fps ∼100% +21%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
28 fps ∼83%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (27.9 - 28, n=2)
28 fps ∼83% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
28 fps ∼83% 0%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (184 - 268, n=2)
226 fps ∼100% +23%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
184 fps ∼81%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
184 fps ∼81% 0%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
177 fps ∼78% -4%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
29.3 fps ∼100% +29%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
22.8 fps ∼78%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
22.8 fps ∼78% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (22.5 - 22.8, n=2)
22.6 fps ∼77% -1%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
101 fps ∼100% +40%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
72.1 fps ∼71%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
72.1 fps ∼71% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (64.2 - 72.1, n=2)
68.2 fps ∼68% -5%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
56.4 fps ∼100% +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
55 fps ∼98%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
55 fps ∼98% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (54.9 - 55, n=2)
54.9 fps ∼97% 0%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (74.2 - 97.2, n=2)
85.7 fps ∼100% +15%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
74.2 fps ∼87%
Average of class Multimedia
  (last 2 years)
74.2 fps ∼87% 0%
HP ZBook Studio G7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
65.5 fps ∼76% -12%
3DMark 11 Performance
25359 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18568 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8963 points
Help

Gaming Performance

The ZenBook Pro Duo 15 with the RTX 3070 and the fast OLED screen is also a great choice for gaming. Many titles can be played at the maximum settings in the native 4K resolution, only very demanding titles will require reduced details or resolutions. The performance will drop a bit if you do not use the Performance Mode, but the fan noise will be a bit quieter in return. As you can see in the chart below, the gaming performance is stable in both performance modes.

Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
70.5 fps ∼100% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (52.9 - 84.3, n=8)
70.4 fps ∼100% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (50 - 70.5, n=11)
62 fps ∼88% 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61.8 fps ∼88%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (48.9 - 58, n=6)
55 fps ∼78% -11%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
36 fps ∼51% -42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4.1 - 61.8, n=6, last 2 years)
25.9 fps ∼37% -58%
The Witcher 3
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (62.2 - 82.2, n=7)
74.2 fps ∼100% +12%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
66 fps ∼89%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
62.9 (50min - 69max) fps ∼85% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (40.3 - 71.9, n=6)
59.4 fps ∼80% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
59.3 fps ∼80% -10%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
55.4 (52min - 60max) fps ∼75% -16%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
41.3 fps ∼56% -37%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
34 fps ∼46% -48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 66, n=13, last 2 years)
30.8 fps ∼42% -53%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (87.7 - 123, n=32)
106 fps ∼100% +28%
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
101 (76min) fps ∼95% +22%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
92.1 (67min) fps ∼87% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (73.5 - 109, n=34)
92 fps ∼87% +11%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
82.8 (79min, 79P1 - 87max) fps ∼78%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
73.5 (67min, 70P1 - 78max) fps ∼69% -11%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
79.5 (76min - 85max) fps ∼75% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (62.8 - 88.5, n=21)
74.4 fps ∼70% -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
57.2 fps ∼54% -31%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
52.1 (49min, 50P1 - 55max) fps ∼49% -37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5 - 92.1, n=75, last 2 years)
30.1 fps ∼28% -64%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (151 - 242, n=25)
193 fps ∼100% +14%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
170 fps ∼88%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
168 (129min - 191max) fps ∼87% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (122 - 207, n=22)
164 fps ∼85% -4%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
149.8 (141min - 158max) fps ∼78% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (128 - 155, n=16)
140 fps ∼73% -18%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX581GV
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
112.8 fps ∼58% -34%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
97 fps ∼50% -43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9 - 170, n=70, last 2 years)
51.4 fps ∼27% -70%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Alienware m15 R4
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
130 (112.7min) fps ∼100% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (103 - 156, n=33)
127 fps ∼98% +6%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
125 (110min) fps ∼96% +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
120 (101.5min) fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (103 - 140, n=33)
118 fps ∼91% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
117 (100.7min) fps ∼90% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (90.7 - 144, n=20)
116 fps ∼89% -3%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
112 (97.2min) fps ∼86% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (13.4 - 144, n=83, last 2 years)
77.4 fps ∼60% -35%
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (99.9 - 128, n=7)
111 fps ∼100% +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (79.3 - 114, n=8)
102 fps ∼92% +29%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
98.8 (86min) fps ∼89% +25%
HP ZBook Fury 15 G7
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
96.7 (83.8min) fps ∼87% +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (91.4 - 94.9, n=2)
93.2 fps ∼84% +18%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
79.3 (67.1min) fps ∼71%
HP ZBook Studio G7
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
71.6 (63.4min) fps ∼65% -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (20.1 - 102, n=19, last 2 years)
57.5 fps ∼52% -27%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (151 - 219, n=25)
188 fps ∼100% +23%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XC
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
161 (75.5min, 117P1 - 283max) fps ∼86% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (105 - 194, n=24)
160 fps ∼85% +5%
Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 LR-1BH2
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
153 (35.8min, 116P1 - 309max) fps ∼81%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (113 - 144, n=16)
130 fps ∼69% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 161, n=22, last 2 years)
61.5 fps ∼33% -60%
3840x2160 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (72.1 - 91.7, n=6)
</