Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM Laptop Review: AMD Still Rules The 14-inch Gaming Space

Zen 3 Cezanne and Nvidia Ampere upgrade. The Zephyrus G14 was the only game in town when it launched early last year, but times have changed. Some aspects of the system still hold up well while others are already starting to age when compared to the new 14-inch Razer Blade 14.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer - Details here

Asus introduced its Zephyrus G14 laptop early last year which made headlines for its small 14-inch form factor, 8-core AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS CPU, and GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Turing graphics. The then-new Zen 2 CPU would allow the G14 to outperform many larger 15.6-inch and 17.3-inch gaming laptops including those with 10th gen Core i9 CPUs.

For 2021, Asus has refreshed its Zephyrus G14 model to run on the newer Zen 3 Ryzen 9 5900HS Cezanne CPU and RTX 3060 Ampere GPU instead. The display and outer lid have also gotten new options to improve the visual experience. Our specific 144 Hz FHD configuration can be found online for $1500 to 1750 USD while the 120 Hz QHD option can be found for up to $2000.

Although the original Zephyrus G14 launched with no direct competitors in its size class, this 2021 version must now face off against the formidable Razer Blade 14. This review will therefore reference the Razer laptop and other larger gaming laptops for comparison purposes.

More Asus reviews: 

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM (ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS 8 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU - 6144 MB, Core: 1382 MHz, Memory: 1530 MHz, 80 W TDP + 20 W Dynamic Boost, GDDR6, 471.11, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, LM140LF-1F02, IPS, Adaptive Sync, NCP005E, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Soundcard
AMD Raven/Renoir/Van Gogh/Cezanne/Rembrandt - HD Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5mm
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 324 x 222 ( = 0.78 x 12.76 x 8.74 in)
Battery
76 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Armoury Crate, Radeon software, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.68 kg ( = 59.26 oz / 3.7 pounds), Power Supply: 545 g ( = 19.22 oz / 1.2 pounds)
Price
1700 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
06/2021
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1.7 kg19.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
84 %
03/2020
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
R9 4900HS, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
1.6 kg17.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
88 %
06/2021
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.8 mm14.00"2560x1440
87 %
02/2021
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
i5-1135G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
1.6 kg17.9 mm14.00"1920x1200
84 %
01/2021
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
1.3 kg16.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
83 %
08/2020
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
2 kg19 mm15.60"3840x2160

Case — Same Look With Some Shinier Trims

The mostly matte chassis remains the same as the 2020 model except for a couple of minor superficial changes: the Zephyrus font along the rear edge and the glossy logo near the corner of the outer lid are now more reflective and slightly purple, respectively. The small holes or perforations on the outer lid are also now reflective for a subtle rainbow effect. Dimensions and rigidity are otherwise untouched as is the optional Anime Matrix LED lighting feature.

For the enthusiasts keeping track, the Razer Blade 14 is both smaller and thinner than the Asus while weighing about 100 g more. The Zephyrus G14 is an older design, after all. 

The Anime Matrix configuration is 2 mm thicker than the configuration without the feature since the outer lid must be able to hold the mini LEDs. Though unique, it's easy to forget that Anime Matrix exists since owners will almost always be looking at the screen and not its other side.

The lid will raise the base at a slight angle to aid in ergonomics and cooling
The lid will raise the base at a slight angle to aid in ergonomics and cooling
Hinge rigidity doesn't feel any better or worse than on the Blade 14, but the lid itself feels sturdier here
Hinge rigidity doesn't feel any better or worse than on the Blade 14, but the lid itself feels sturdier here
The glossy logo near the corner of the outer lid is more purple than on last year's model
The glossy logo near the corner of the outer lid is more purple than on last year's model
The perforations on the outer lid are an easy way to distinguish the Zephyrus G14 from other laptops
The perforations on the outer lid are an easy way to distinguish the Zephyrus G14 from other laptops
More curves, corners, and small design nuances than on the smoother Blade 14
More curves, corners, and small design nuances than on the smoother Blade 14
Lid opened to maximum angle (~145 degrees)
Lid opened to maximum angle (~145 degrees)
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
358 mm / 14.1 inch 237 mm / 9.33 inch 19 mm / 0.748 inch 2 kg4.5 lbs324 mm / 12.8 inch 222 mm / 8.74 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 1.7 kg3.7 lbs324 mm / 12.8 inch 222 mm / 8.74 inch 17.9 mm / 0.705 inch 1.6 kg3.53 lbs319.7 mm / 12.6 inch 220 mm / 8.66 inch 16.8 mm / 0.661 inch 1.8 kg3.9 lbs319 mm / 12.6 inch 199 mm / 7.83 inch 16.9 mm / 0.665 inch 1.3 kg2.84 lbs313.1 mm / 12.3 inch 224 mm / 8.82 inch 17.9 mm / 0.705 inch 1.6 kg3.59 lbs

Connectivity — No Thunderbolt Compatibility

Port options and positioning haven't changed from the original G14. Thunderbolt remains elusive due to the AMD CPU, but at least the left USB-C port supports display-out, Power Delivery, and G-Sync.

Many of the ports are closer to the front edge than on most other notebooks where cables can get in the way.

Front: No ports
Front: No ports
Right: USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2 (no DP, PD, or G-Sync), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, Kensington lock
Right: USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2 (no DP, PD, or G-Sync), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, Kensington lock
Rear: No ports
Rear: No ports
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0b, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2 (w/ DP, PD, and G-Sync), 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0b, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2 (w/ DP, PD, and G-Sync), 3.5 mm combo audio

Communication

An Intel AX200 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 connectivity. Transfer rates are consistent over time for reliable performance.

Asus likes to hide the M.2 WLAN module underneath the M.2 SSDs
Asus likes to hide the M.2 WLAN module underneath the M.2 SSDs
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1645 (1401min - 1773max) MBit/s ∼100% +64%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1365 (1309min - 1394max) MBit/s ∼83% +36%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1260 (579min - 1376max) MBit/s ∼77% +26%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1192 (526min - 1384max) MBit/s ∼72% +19%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1183 (575min - 1294max) MBit/s ∼72% +18%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1002 (735min - 1087max) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1416 (1229min - 1441max) MBit/s ∼100% +21%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 (782min - 1528max) MBit/s ∼99% +19%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1336 (1246min - 1419max) MBit/s ∼94% +14%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1242 (1133min - 1283max) MBit/s ∼88% +6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1174 (1002min - 1406max) MBit/s ∼83%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1079 (989min - 1182max) MBit/s ∼76% -8%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140011541154101811141136107410021146115911521183115510881095105410891083119012151184114712551301119511711177140613821321140211541154101811141136107410021146115911521183115510881095105410891083119012151184114712551301119511711177140613821321140210129987359831003100410159951050984105210571087102210121036987102710701048100710011037104810339651011961974844Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1173 (1002-1406)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1002 (735-1087)

Maintenance

The bottom panel is easily removable with just a Philips screwdriver. Upgrade options may be limited, but at least RAM is expandable unlike on the Razer Blade 14.

Asus has changed the orientation of at least one heat pipe when compared to the 2020 GA401
Asus has changed the orientation of at least one heat pipe when compared to the 2020 GA401

Accessories and Warranty

There are no extras in the box outside of the AC adapter and paperwork. The usual one-year limited manufacturer warranty applies.

Input Devices — Excellent Key Feedback

Keyboard

Key size and feedback remain the same as on last year's model. We prefer the typing experience on the G14 over the Blade 14 as its keys have both deeper travel and stronger feedback. On the flip side, the keyboard here supports only single-zone white backlighting compared to the per-key RGB lighting of the Razer.

The layout of some secondary functions have changed year-over-year. For example, the brightness controls for the keyboard backlight have been moved to the top row while a new "Aura" key for toggling the backlight has replaced the fast forward key.

Touchpad

The Precision clickpad is smaller than the one of the Blade 14 (10.5 x 6 cm vs. 11.1 x 7.6 cm). Cursor control is still smooth and with just a bit of sticking when gliding at slow speeds while the integrated mouse keys remain shallow and with not enough feedback.

Slight changes to the layout of some secondary keys when compared to the 2020 model
Slight changes to the layout of some secondary keys when compared to the 2020 model
Gray clickpad surface
Gray clickpad surface
Deeper travel and stronger feedback than most 14-inch Ultrabooks
Deeper travel and stronger feedback than most 14-inch Ultrabooks
Super-small arrow keys feel cramped
Super-small arrow keys feel cramped

Display — Smooth 144 Hz With Good Colors

Whereas the 2020 Zephyrus G14 uses a 120 Hz CEC PA LM140LF-1F01 IPS panel, our 2021 model uses a 144 Hz CEC PA LM140LF-1F02 IPS panel. Both appear to be essentially identical in color coverage and brightness according to our tests while other characteristics like response times and contrast ratios may be slightly better and worse, respectively, on the newer panel. It's a midrange to high-end panel overall even though it can't come close to the colors or response times of many 15.6-inch or 17.3-inch gaming-ready displays.

Note that Asus offers a higher resolution 1440p display option with full DCI-P3 coverage but a lower 120 Hz native refresh rate. The Blade 14 offers a similar 1440p panel as well albeit with an even higher 165 Hz native refresh rate.

FreeSync is enabled by default on the main display while G-Sync is supported for compatible external monitors.

Bottom "chin" bezel is thick relative to the other three edges
Bottom "chin" bezel is thick relative to the other three edges
Narrow bezels on three of the four sides. The system still lacks a webcam
Narrow bezels on three of the four sides. The system still lacks a webcam
Slight uneven backlight bleeding along the edges and corners
Slight uneven backlight bleeding along the edges and corners
Matte panel is just slightly grainy when compared to a typical glossy panel
Matte panel is just slightly grainy when compared to a typical glossy panel
313.1
cd/m²
318.4
cd/m²
305.4
cd/m²
307.2
cd/m²
329.4
cd/m²
310.3
cd/m²
295.8
cd/m²
323.1
cd/m²
299.6
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LM140LF-1F02
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 329.4 cd/m² Average: 311.4 cd/m² Minimum: 16.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 329.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 845:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.01 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 3.89
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
67.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
LM140LF-1F02, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
CEC PA LM140LF-1F01, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
TL140BDXP02-2, IPS, 14.00, 2560x1440
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
AU Optronics AUOF392, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1200
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Au Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Samsung SDC4145, AMOLED, 15.60, 3840x2160
Display
-1%
26%
11%
-7%
29%
Display P3 Coverage
68.1
66.54
-2%
97.2
43%
77.11
13%
60.88
-11%
88.48
30%
sRGB Coverage
92.4
92.04
0%
99.9
8%
99.81
8%
90.37
-2%
99.99
8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.7
67.22
-1%
85.4
26%
76.66
13%
62.25
-8%
99.92
48%
Response Times
-27%
57%
-73%
-7%
94%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34.4 (15.6, 18.8)
43.6 (21.2, 22.4)
-27%
16.4 (8, 8.4)
52%
61.2 (30, 31.2)
-78%
39 (20, 19)
-13%
0.8 (0.4, 0.4)
98%
Response Time Black / White *
27.6 (16.4, 11.2)
34.8 (20.4, 14.4)
-26%
10.8 (5.6, 5.2)
61%
46 (24, 22)
-67%
28 (17, 11)
-1%
2.7 (1.3, 1.4)
90%
PWM Frequency
242.7 (44)
Screen
21%
20%
34%
-6%
1%
Brightness middle
329.4
322.2
-2%
331.1
1%
412
25%
323
-2%
374.3
14%
Brightness
311
302
-3%
318
2%
392
26%
313
1%
379
22%
Brightness Distribution
90
87
-3%
91
1%
81
-10%
80
-11%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.26
33%
0.36
8%
0.32
18%
0.36
8%
Contrast
845
1239
47%
920
9%
1288
52%
897
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.01
2.43
39%
2.25
44%
1.88
53%
4.86
-21%
5.47
-36%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.21
5.07
38%
4.62
44%
3.06
63%
7.52
8%
8.22
-0%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.89
2.29
41%
1.96
50%
3.64
6%
4.61
-19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.2
3.3
-3%
1.7
47%
2.2
31%
4.83
-51%
2.3
28%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.22 99%
2.3 96%
2.1 105%
2.64 83%
2.09 105%
CCT
7070 92%
6902 94%
6751 96%
6650 98%
7405 88%
6340 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
68.7
57.5
87.8
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.9
99.8
90.3
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / 9%
34% / 27%
-9% / 14%
-7% / -7%
41% / 24%

* ... smaller is better

Color space covers >90 percent of sRGB to be more than enough for gaming and just barely passable for digital artists. Again, the WQHD option offers full DCI-P3 coverage for users who demand the deeper colors.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Asus claims a pre-calibrated display which our independent X-Rite colorimeter measurements can confirm. Average grayscale and color DeltaE values would barely change after attempting to calibrate the panel ourselves. Color temperature is a bit too cool, however, and so users may want to adjust it further.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15366 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is decent when under shade but otherwise subpar on bright days as the backlight isn't as bright as most dedicated Ultrabooks like the Dell XPS or MacBook. Viewing angles are excellent which is to be expected from an IPS panel.

Outdoors on an overcast day
Outdoors on an overcast day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on an overcast day
Outdoors on an overcast day

Performance — 35 W AMD Zen 3 CPU With 60 W to 80 W RTX GPU

Asus is doubling down on AMD again by going with its latest Zen 3 Ryzen 9 5900HS CPU instead of an Intel Tiger Lake-H part. This particular processor directly replaces the Ryzen 9 4900HS on last year's Zephyrus G14. The Blade 14 and even smaller ROG Flow X13 are using the slightly different unlocked Ryzen 9 5900HX and 5980HS instead, respectively.

GPU options appear to be fixed at the GeForce RTX 3060 with resizable BAR and no 3070 or 3080 options. The maximum TGP (including Dynamic Boost) is only 80 W compared to 100 W or more on laptops like the Blade 14 or Aorus 17 meaning performance will be slightly slower on our Zephyrus G14. The Max-Q moniker may be gone, but its legacy remains when dealing with these small form factor gaming laptops.

RAM is soldered at 8 GB or 16 GB of DDR4-3200 depending on the SKU with one SODIMM expansion slot.

Our unit was set to Turbo mode via Armoury Crate prior to running any performance benchmarks below for the highest possible scores. Owners should become accustomed with the Armoury Crate software as key features like fan control, lighting, and performance are all toggled here.

Asus has confirmed with us that the system utilizes liquid metal thermal paste for the CPU.

 

Processor

Raw processor performance is essentially on par with the new 11th gen Tiger Lake-H Core i7-11800H that only just became widely available. This includes single-core benchmarks as well which is where AMD would normally falter. Users are truly getting the processor performance of a 15.6-inch or 17.3-inch gaming laptop in a small 14-inch form factor with the Zephyrus G14.

The gen-to-gen performance gains over the Ryzen 9 4900HS are about 10 to 20 percent. The 4900HS was already top-of-the-line when it launched early last year and so we weren't expecting huge improvements with the Ryzen 9 5900HS.

Any differences between the 5900HS and 5900HX are extremely minor as they are each limited by the overarching cooling solution of the laptop.

010521031542052563073584094510501155126013651470157516801785189019952094.682088.012093.582095.452090.32092.822089.212098.422092.822094.352083.552091.392084.742093.142089.212088.882090.742083.982091.52086.482090.082087.462086.162081.62084.962084.852083.442089.752083.552087.92090.522088.452088.882088.662084.742087.252081.172087.362082.682084.532082.682080.522084.22082.032079.332089.432087.92091.282080.32081.711850.911824.571821.9918041801.481780.151743.761641.971611.991630.461591.981629.391622.191625.291625.291640.891630.461624.31635.791637.81638.811627.411636.731631.521631.521630.461632.521639.811636.731636.731630.461632.591630.461634.651627.341630.461635.661636.731638.811631.521634.591633.591630.461628.41630.461633.591627.341633.591629.391630.462009.652044.892051.492051.182051.812048.552055.392054.552054.442054.552052.862051.812057.612053.282056.342051.392048.452053.072052.972048.242048.242050.132056.132052.862051.492060.792052.762051.492056.032050.972056.342055.392056.242055.922050.232052.762056.452051.282051.182051.072056.242052.972054.652056.242056.032055.822053.182051.62053.392057.51919.27921.89919.86920.11922.85913.99891.54921.13913.03910.93908.43908.08908.12910.27919.77920.98922.89923.28917.24922.85918.67918.67923.77920.28918.74924.06919.41919.94921.04920.77918.97921918.59924.3920.98923.04916.61921.68920.49920.26920.37921.02920.15921.87921.62919.9921.87924.6923.23922.72095.122011.162009.651997.12025.521980.11977.072020.711989.361994.221987.782022.352011.261993.922003.411990.842000.31987.782004.912004.911997.11978.531997.11978.531986.291980.11963.381993.921997.12000.31998.71983.141998.72008.032015.931978.921987.782017.551964.931964.932001.72019.182004.911974.041998.71980.22012.781995.512000.31981.672094.682088.012093.582095.452090.32092.822089.212098.422092.822094.352083.552091.392084.742093.142089.212088.882090.742083.982091.52086.482090.082087.462086.162081.62084.962084.852083.442089.752083.552087.92090.522088.452088.882088.662084.742087.252081.172087.362082.682084.532082.682080.522084.22082.032079.332089.432087.92091.282080.32081.711850.911824.571821.9918041801.481780.151743.761641.971611.991630.461591.981629.391622.191625.291625.291640.891630.461624.31635.791637.81638.811627.411636.731631.521631.521630.461632.521639.811636.731636.731630.461632.591630.461634.651627.341630.461635.661636.731638.811631.521634.591633.591630.461628.41630.461633.591627.341633.591629.391630.462009.652044.892051.492051.182051.812048.552055.392054.552054.442054.552052.862051.812057.612053.282056.342051.392048.452053.072052.972048.242048.242050.132056.132052.862051.492060.792052.762051.492056.032050.972056.342055.392056.242055.922050.232052.762056.452051.282051.182051.072056.242052.972054.652056.242056.032055.822053.182051.62053.392057.51919.27921.89919.86920.11922.85913.99891.54921.13913.03910.93908.43908.08908.12910.27919.77920.98922.89923.28917.24922.85918.67918.67923.77920.28918.74924.06919.41919.94921.04920.77918.97921918.59924.3920.98923.04916.61921.68920.49920.26920.37921.02920.15921.87921.62919.9921.87924.6923.23922.72095.122011.162009.651997.12025.521980.11977.072020.711989.361994.221987.782022.352011.261993.922003.411990.842000.31987.782004.912004.911997.11978.531997.11978.531986.291980.11963.381993.921997.12000.31998.71983.141998.72008.032015.931978.921987.782017.551964.931964.932001.72019.182004.911974.041998.71980.22012.781995.512000.31981.672094.682088.012093.582095.452090.32092.822089.212098.422092.822094.352083.552091.392084.742093.142089.212088.882090.742083.982091.52086.482090.082087.462086.162081.62084.962084.852083.442089.752083.552087.92090.522088.452088.882088.662084.742087.252081.172087.362082.682084.532082.682080.522084.22082.032079.332089.432087.92091.282080.32081.711850.911824.571821.9918041801.481780.151743.761641.971611.991630.461591.981629.391622.191625.291625.291640.891630.461624.31635.791637.81638.811627.411636.731631.521631.521630.461632.521639.811636.731636.731630.461632.591630.461634.651627.341630.461635.661636.731638.811631.521634.591633.591630.461628.41630.461633.591627.341633.591629.391630.462009.652044.892051.492051.182051.812048.552055.392054.552054.442054.552052.862051.812057.612053.282056.342051.392048.452053.072052.972048.242048.242050.132056.132052.862051.492060.792052.762051.492056.032050.972056.342055.392056.242055.922050.232052.762056.452051.282051.182051.072056.242052.972054.652056.242056.032055.822053.182051.62053.392057.51919.27921.89919.86920.11922.85913.99891.54921.13913.03910.93908.43908.08908.12910.27919.77920.98922.89923.28917.24922.85918.67918.67923.77920.28918.74924.06919.41919.94921.04920.77918.97921918.59924.3920.98923.04916.61921.68920.49920.26920.37921.02920.15921.87921.62919.9921.87924.6923.23922.72095.122011.162009.651997.12025.521980.11977.072020.711989.361994.221987.782022.352011.261993.922003.411990.842000.31987.782004.912004.911997.11978.531997.11978.531986.291980.11963.381993.921997.12000.31998.71983.141998.72008.032015.931978.921987.782017.551964.931964.932001.72019.182004.911974.041998.71980.22012.781995.512000.31981.67Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø2088 (2079.33-2098.42)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1655 (1591.98-1850.91)
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø2052 (2009.65-2060.79)
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr Intel Core i5-1135G7; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø919 (891.54-924.6)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1997 (1963.38-2095.12)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5182 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
5058 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (4733 - 5058, n=2)
4896 Points ∼94% -3%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4876 Points ∼94% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
4403 Points ∼85% -13%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points ∼83% -15%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
3076 Points ∼59% -39%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
2382 Points ∼46% -53%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1452 Points ∼28% -71%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
600 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points ∼97% +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
568 Points ∼95%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (560 - 568, n=2)
564 Points ∼94% -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
548 Points ∼91% -4%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
503 Points ∼84% -11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points ∼83% -13%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
471 Points ∼79% -17%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
431 Points ∼72% -24%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
13445 (12565.7min - 13444.6max) Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
13158 (12786.6min - 13158max) Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (12333 - 13158, n=2)
12746 Points ∼95% -3%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12652 (12516min - 12651.7max) Points ∼94% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
11567 Points ∼86% -12%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
6136 (5867.5min - 6136.37max) Points ∼46% -53%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4266 Points ∼32% -68%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
1574 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
1509 Points ∼96% +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (1457 - 1483, n=2)
1470 Points ∼93% +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
1457 Points ∼93%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1337 Points ∼85% -8%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1218 Points ∼77% -16%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
2098 (2079.33min - 2098.42max) Points ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
2095 (1963.38min - 2095.12max) Points ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2061 (2009.65min - 2060.79max) Points ∼98% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (2020 - 2098, n=2)
2059 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
2029 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points ∼89% -11%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
1293 (1270.12min - 1293.49max) Points ∼62% -38%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
925 (891.54min - 924.6max) Points ∼44% -56%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
747 Points ∼36% -64%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
235 Points ∼98%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points ∼95% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (211 - 235, n=2)
223 Points ∼93% -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
210 Points ∼87% -11%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
198 Points ∼82% -16%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
197 Points ∼82% -16%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
197 Points ∼82% -16%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points ∼80% -18%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
692 Seconds * ∼100% -197%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
499 Seconds * ∼72% -114%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
352 Seconds * ∼51% -51%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * ∼43% -27%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
251 Seconds * ∼36% -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
242 Seconds * ∼35% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (233 - 249, n=2)
241 Seconds * ∼35% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
235 Seconds * ∼34% -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
233 Seconds * ∼34%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
5870 MIPS ∼100% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
5659 MIPS ∼96% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (5637 - 5669, n=2)
5653 MIPS ∼96% 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
5637 MIPS ∼96%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5209 MIPS ∼89% -8%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4791 MIPS ∼82% -15%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4694 MIPS ∼80% -17%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS ∼79% -18%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
4505 MIPS ∼77% -20%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (55697 - 59680, n=2)
57689 MIPS ∼100% +4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
55697 MIPS ∼97%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52370 MIPS ∼91% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
51046 MIPS ∼88% -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
50441 MIPS ∼87% -9%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS ∼84% -13%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
31820 MIPS ∼55% -43%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
24188 MIPS ∼42% -57%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
21119 MIPS ∼37% -62%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
1576 Points ∼100%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1530 Points ∼97%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
 
1410 Points ∼89%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
1406 Points ∼89%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
1275 Points ∼81%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1218 Points ∼77%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
 
7910 Points ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
7725 Points ∼98%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
7675 Points ∼97%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
6335 Points ∼80%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5310 Points ∼67%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
4695 Points ∼59%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.6 fps ∼100% +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
15.3 fps ∼98%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.3 fps ∼98% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
14.9 fps ∼96% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (13.8 - 15.3, n=2)
14.6 fps ∼94% -5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.193 fps ∼78% -20%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.3 fps ∼66% -33%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
7.6 fps ∼49% -50%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.38 fps ∼34% -65%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58.9 s * ∼100% -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
54.2 s * ∼92% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (51.9 - 54.9, n=2)
53.4 s * ∼91% -3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
51.9 s * ∼88%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
49.6 s * ∼84% +4%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
47.9 s * ∼81% +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
45.8 s * ∼78% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.5 s * ∼76% +14%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Intel Core i5-1135G7
0.634 sec * ∼100% -24%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.61 sec * ∼96% -20%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.599 sec * ∼94% -17%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.571 sec * ∼90% -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * ∼88% -9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.529 sec * ∼83% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
  (0.51 - 0.538, n=2)
0.524 sec * ∼83% -3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
0.51 sec * ∼80%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2098 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
143 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
235 Points
Help

System Performance

PCMark 10 results are ever-so-slightly below that of the Blade 14 in Digital Content Creation due to the faster RTX 3070 GPU in the Razer system. Scores are otherwise very close to one another to be consistently higher than on last year's Zephyrus G14.

PCMark 10 / Score
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6967 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6773 Points ∼97%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
6773 Points ∼97% 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5751 Points ∼83% -15%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
5553 Points ∼80% -18%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5410 Points ∼78% -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5150 Points ∼74% -24%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10418 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
10418 Points ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10413 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
9920 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
9359 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9079 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
9036 Points ∼87% -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9394 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
9394 Points ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9381 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
8386 Points ∼89% -11%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
8342 Points ∼89% -11%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
7767 Points ∼83% -17%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7606 Points ∼81% -19%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9395 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
8615 Points ∼92%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
 
8615 Points ∼92% 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
6843 Points ∼73% -21%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
6395 Points ∼68% -26%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5701 Points ∼61% -34%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4870 Points ∼52% -43%
PCMark 10 Score
6773 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows heavy DPC latency issues when opening multiple browser tabs on our homepage. 4K video playback is otherwise smooth and with no dropped frames. CPU and GPU utilization would each sit in the single-digit range only.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5541.7 μs * ∼100%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
5214.4 μs * ∼94% +6%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3239 μs * ∼58% +42%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
2840.6 μs * ∼51% +49%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
392.6 μs * ∼7% +93%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
370.7 μs * ∼7% +93%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices — Just One M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 2280 Option

Instead of an Intel 660p like on last year's model, Asus has upgraded to the SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N which is able to offer significantly faster read rates approaching 3600 MB/s. Write rates are also faster even though they don't quite match the popular Samsung PM981a.

The internal M.2 slot does not fully support PCIe 4 SSDs that are becoming increasingly common on newer Intel laptops.

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS SSD
AS SSD
Accessible M.2 2280 slot
Accessible M.2 2280 slot
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
AS SSD
-28%
10%
-20%
9%
Seq Read
2922.68
1278.25
-56%
3066.19
5%
2127.26
-27%
2861.17
-2%
Seq Write
1801.06
1624.46
-10%
2805.31
56%
1426.85
-21%
2837.42
58%
4K Read
50.01
57.77
16%
49.8
0%
52.46
5%
60.27
21%
4K Write
109.03
163.01
50%
119.68
10%
122.9
13%
164.18
51%
4K-64 Read
1400.02
581.92
-58%
2092.8
49%
947.31
-32%
1598.14
14%
4K-64 Write
2216.14
849.01
-62%
2009.36
-9%
1598.44
-28%
1572.1
-29%
Access Time Read *
0.04
0.036
10%
0.046
-15%
0.072
-80%
0.046
-15%
Access Time Write *
0.102
0.112
-10%
0.086
16%
0.09
12%
0.021
79%
Score Read
1742
768
-56%
2449
41%
1212
-30%
1945
12%
Score Write
2505
1174
-53%
2410
-4%
1864
-26%
2020
-19%
Score Total
5088
2372
-53%
6095
20%
3674
-28%
4966
-2%
Copy ISO MB/s
2076.16
1660.01
-20%
1799.37
-13%
1605.34
-23%
2413.8
16%
Copy Program MB/s
878.5
443.52
-50%
750.12
-15%
847.37
-4%
574.69
-35%
Copy Game MB/s
1854.56
1162.09
-37%
1829.84
-1%
1632.3
-12%
1407.96
-24%

* ... smaller is better

SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3601 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2998 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 458.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 519.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2154 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2412 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 54.38 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 131.9 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0180360540720900108012601440162018001980216023402520270028803060324034202264.923572.6935753575.853576.93577.323577.743577.933577.933578.553578.9735793579.213579.393579.393580.863581.693582.113582.363582.533582.563582.743582.743582.953583.163583.163583.373583.583583.6135843584.033584.23584.243584.453584.663585.083585.293585.293585.463585.53585.673586.133586.133586.33586.33587.813588.393589.073589.283589.9Tooltip
: Ø3556 (2264.92-3589.9)

GPU Performance

Graphics performance with our Zephyrus G14 is almost 10 percent slower than the average laptop in our database equipped with the same RTX 3060 GPU. This deficit would remain true even when running the system on Turbo or maximum fan mode. Running the laptop in Performance mode instead of Turbo mode would result in a graphics dip of about 3 to 4 percent.

The slightly lower 3DMark scores translate to slightly slower frame rates during real-world gameplay. Performance in more demanding games like GTA V, Final Fantasy XV, or Witcher 3 would be behind the average RTX 3060 laptop by a few percentage points. Frame rates are nonetheless steady and without any unusual dips or micro-stuttering over time.

Users can still expect 15 to 30 percent faster graphics performance over the RTX 2060 Max-Q despite the below-average scores from our 60+ W RTX 3060.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Port Royal
Port Royal
Fire Strike (Performance mode)
Fire Strike (Performance mode)
Fire Strike (Turbo mode)
Fire Strike (Turbo mode)
Time Spy (Turbo mode)
Time Spy (Turbo mode)
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
23373 Points ∼100% +27%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
21111 Points ∼90% +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (16956 - 22460, n=19)
19998 Points ∼86% +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
19737 Points ∼84% +7%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
18436 Points ∼79%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS
15650 Points ∼67% -15%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H
15578 Points ∼67% -16%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7
8131 Points ∼35% -56%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
4371 Points ∼19% -76%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
9768 Points ∼100% +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6475 - 8844, n=19)
7800 Points ∼80% +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
7677 Points ∼79% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
7582 Points ∼78% +5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
7234 Points ∼74%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H
5914 Points ∼61% -18%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS
5850 Points ∼60% -19%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7
2982 Points ∼31% -59%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
1682 Points ∼17% -77%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
9649 Points ∼100% +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
7848 Points ∼81% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (6529 - 8863, n=19)
7816 Points ∼81% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
7778 Points ∼81% +6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
7371 Points ∼76%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS
6171 Points ∼64% -16%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H
6052 Points ∼63% -18%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7
3168 Points ∼33% -57%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
1827 Points ∼19% -75%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
33833 Points ∼100% +53%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
27898 Points ∼82% +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (22063 - 30200, n=17)
26067 Points ∼77% +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
25793 Points ∼76% +17%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
22063 Points ∼65%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS
21105 Points ∼62% -4%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H
20572 Points ∼61% -7%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7
11055 Points ∼33% -50%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
6524 Points ∼19% -70%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
15770 Points ∼100% +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
15274 Points ∼97% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (10227 - 17479, n=16)
14548 Points ∼92% +2%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
14231 Points ∼90% 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
14204 Points ∼90%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS
13533 Points ∼86% -5%
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H
13033 Points ∼83% -8%
HP Envy 14-eb0010nr
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, i5-1135G7
10250 Points ∼65% -28%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX435EG
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7
6572 Points ∼42% -54%
3DMark 11 Performance
19586 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
44342 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17223 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7371 points
Help
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 199, n=19)
178 fps ∼100% +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (151 - 158, n=2)
155 fps ∼87% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 195, n=17)
154 fps ∼87% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (124 - 161, n=14)
144 fps ∼81% +4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
139 fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (121 - 137, n=4)
130 fps ∼73% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (98.4 - 144, n=4)
118 fps ∼66% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (54.8 - 82.3, n=3)
68 fps ∼38% -51%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (113 - 154, n=20)
136 fps ∼100% +53%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (67 - 142, n=18)
111 fps ∼82% +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (100 - 106, n=3)
103 fps ∼76% +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (88.4 - 112, n=14)
99.7 fps ∼73% +12%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
88.7 fps ∼65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (74 - 89.2, n=5)
82.3 fps ∼61% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (78.1 - 87.6, n=5)
81.5 fps ∼60% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (47.7 - 51.2, n=4)
49.6 fps ∼36% -44%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (85.4 - 115, n=23)
103 fps ∼100% +49%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (62 - 103, n=23)
85.5 fps ∼83% +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (77 - 80.6, n=3)
78.6 fps ∼76% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (67.4 - 87.2, n=15)
76.4 fps ∼74% +11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.9 fps ∼67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (52 - 67.5, n=7)
61.8 fps ∼60% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (55.4 - 63.9, n=5)
59 fps ∼57% -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (33.6 - 37.2, n=4)
35.5 fps ∼34% -48%
GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 186, n=23)
181 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 185, n=18)
177 fps ∼98% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 182, n=17)
176 fps ∼97% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (163 - 179, n=3)
173 fps ∼96% +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
172 (6.76min, 111P1 - 279max) fps ∼95%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (153 - 178, n=4)
171 fps ∼94% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (153 - 168, n=5)
160 fps ∼88% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (99.1 - 178, n=5)
132 fps ∼73% -23%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (173 - 186, n=22)
180 fps ∼100% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (174 - 179, n=2)
177 fps ∼98% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (150 - 185, n=17)
174 fps ∼97% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (168 - 175, n=4)
173 fps ∼96% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (156 - 180, n=14)
171 fps ∼95% +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
167 (6.03min, 100P1 - 298max) fps ∼93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (124 - 163, n=3)
148 fps ∼82% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (95.3 - 175, n=3)
145 fps ∼81% -13%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (160 - 182, n=23)
173 fps ∼100% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (167 - 173, n=2)
170 fps ∼98% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (138 - 181, n=18)
166 fps ∼96% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (146 - 175, n=14)
165 fps ∼95% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (159 - 169, n=4)
165 fps ∼95% +3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
160 (5.95min, 100P1 - 279max) fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (113 - 155, n=3)
138 fps ∼80% -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (87.8 - 167, n=3)
138 fps ∼80% -14%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 176, n=24)
161 fps ∼100% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (111 - 173, n=18)
148 fps ∼92% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (120 - 160, n=17)
146 fps ∼91% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (127 - 160, n=3)
145 fps ∼90% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (124 - 140, n=5)
135 fps ∼84% +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
134 (6.62min, 90.9P1 - 259max) fps ∼83%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (94.5 - 127, n=5)
114 fps ∼71% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (67.7 - 102, n=5)
79.5 fps ∼49% -41%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (84 - 112, n=25)
97.9 fps ∼100% +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (72.6 - 108, n=22)
87.5 fps ∼89% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (69.2 - 92.5, n=17)
83.2 fps ∼85% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (71.4 - 87, n=3)
80.1 fps ∼82% +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
79.6 (8.68min, 55.6P1 - 143max) fps ∼81%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (68.1 - 76, n=5)
72.8 fps ∼74% -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (60 - 70.8, n=5)
65.3 fps ∼67% -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (38.1 - 51.1, n=5)
42.6 fps ∼44% -46%
Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (133 - 183, n=32)
157 fps ∼100% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (127 - 173, n=28)
147 fps ∼94% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (123 - 180, n=19)
145 fps ∼92% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (130 - 153, n=9)
144 fps ∼92% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (109 - 150, n=11)
136 fps ∼87% +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
133 (112.9min) fps ∼85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (104 - 149, n=18)
133 fps ∼85% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (75.8 - 148, n=18)
123 fps ∼78% -8%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (82.7 - 170, n=32)
142 fps ∼100% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (116 - 167, n=19)
134 fps ∼94% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (116 - 156, n=28)
134 fps ∼94% +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
132 (117.1min) fps ∼93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (121 - 140, n=9)
131 fps ∼92% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (110 - 135, n=11)
127 fps ∼89% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (94.7 - 135, n=18)
122 fps ∼86% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
  (69.1 - 136, n=18)
111 fps ∼78% -16%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (113 - 161, n=32)
135 fps ∼100% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (107 - 149, n=29)
125 fps ∼93% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
  (106 - 152, n=19)
122 fps ∼90% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (104 - 131, n=9)
122 fps ∼90% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (103 - 130, n=11)
120 fps ∼89% +4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU