Corsair One i300 desktop PC tames Core i9-12900K and RTX 3080 Ti in a 12-Liter case
Corsair has been selling the One series since 2018, packing current gaming hardware in a compact case that includes water cooling. We already saw in the Corsair One i160 that this system works.
At this-year's CES, Corsair announced an update for the Corsair One that is equipped with the current Alder Lake series, which has now regained the performance crown as the fastest gaming CPU. In addition to the Intel Core i9-12900K, Corsair also includes an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. Both components provide an excellent basis for 4K gaming without compromises. After our initial tests, we were also able to confirm this, even though the manufacturer still keeps the Intel Core i9-12900K somewhat on a leash. More on this later in the test. In terms of the powerful components, there are also ample 64 GB of working memory and a lightning-fast 2-TB SSD including the professional version of Windows 11.
Corsair asks for 5100 Euros (~$5724) for the system as equipped in our test. If you are content with 32 GB of working memory and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080, you have to pay exactly 1000 Euros (~$1122) less.
Case
Visually, the case of the Corsair One i300 can hardly be distinguished from the Corsair One i160, and in terms of the choice of materials, the manufacturer also kept the same concept with all the surfaces made of metal that offers a high-quality impression not only in terms of the looks. The haptics also give an impression of always having a very high-quality product in your hands. The black, modest design is marked by two RGB light bars in front, which can be adjusted according to your preferences using the iCUE software. The workmanship is topnotch, and we did not see any faults. The design of the insides offers space for two independent water-cooling systems for CPU and GPU.
Despite its compactness, the small PC brings 7.5 kg to the scale. You wouldn't expect this at first glance, but this also confirms the materials used, since in such a small case, everything possible needs to be used to transfer the heat created.
Equipment - The most current
In the One i300, Corsair uses a conventional Mini-ITX mainboard from MSI. To be exact, Corsair uses the MSI MEG Z690I Unify in our test unit. With this, the desktop PC is also well-equipped with external connections. There are a total of 8 USB ports in the back, two of which also support Thunderbolt 4. The front houses an additional 3 USB ports. The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti itself also adds 3x DisplayPort and one HDMI connection.
In terms of network connections, the user can choose either WLAN at the most current standard or Ethernet (2.5G).
Communication
The Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 module built into the main board is the most current available, so you can also use Wi-Fi 6G networks. Using our current test router, which also supports the newest standard, the Corsair One i300 delivers fast and stable transfer rates in our WLAN test.
Note: Since our test unit was unfortunately sent to us without the original WLAN antennas, we performed this test using alternative antennas. We are currently unable to say whether the transfer rates are even slightly better when using the original antennas.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (1003 - 1501, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (1178 - 1623, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ301ZE | |
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=231) | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Average of class Desktop (801 - 1478, n=4, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=231) | |
Average of class Desktop (629 - 1618, n=3, last 2 years) |
Maintenance
In case the performance of the Corsair One i300 is insufficient or the storage solution turns out too small, you can also upgrade the computer. However, you should be careful, since the space inside is very limited. The desktop PC can be opened easily. The top case cover with the 140-mm fan is quickly removed and the side covers are only attached with two screws. But then the hoses of the AiOs will hinder a quick replacement of the components. While you can still access the working memory fairly easily, things look more difficult if you want to get to the storage solution. For this reason, we would have liked another option in the available configurations, since there is a total of three M.2 slots on the mainboard. However, the system is already well-equipped with 2 TB of storage.
Performance
Looking purely in terms of the components used, the Corsair One i300 offers very fast processors for gaming with the Intel Core i9-12900K and the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. Currently, the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is Nvidia's second fastest graphics card, remaining only a few percentage points behind the GeForce RTX 3090. Although that might also have fit into the case if you only consider the physical size, the cooling of the VRAM chips probably led Corsair to "only" use a GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. The slightly weaker model of the Corsair One i300 is equipped with a GeForce RTX 3080, which might be the more reasonable choice because of its lower purchase price.
Processor
The Corsair One i300 is equipped with Intel's fastest processor that is currently available for gaming. To be exact, Corsair uses the Intel Core i9-12900K based on a Z690 board from MSI. We were already able to see in advance what performance can be delivered by the new flagship from Intel. For additional details concerning the Intel Core i9-12900K, we refer to this page. However, there is a small limitation in the Corsair One i300 in terms of the maximum power consumption. PL1 and also PL2 are limited to the values of 165 and 175 watts respectively, which means that the processor is slightly throttled under load. Without this limitation, the Intel Core i9-12900K should be able to consume up to 241 watts. On the other hand, this option can be modified in the BIOS. But this would then also result in a higher noise volume and higher temperatures.
In the benchmark we are running, the Intel Core i9-12900K does very well, even if it is unable to use its full performance under load. The performance increase compared to the Corsair One i160 is immense. In the overall rating, the current system offers 48% more performance.
For additional comparisons and benchmarks, we refer you to our CPU comparison chart.
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Average of class Desktop | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K -6! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (25245 - 27005, n=2) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average of class Desktop (277 - 38314, n=17, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-11900K |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (1998 - 2011, n=2) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average of class Desktop (1595 - 2211, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-10900K |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (9630 - 10240, n=2) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average of class Desktop (2024 - 14891, n=14, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (766 - 777, n=2) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average of class Desktop (451 - 870, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average of class Desktop (831 - 6236, n=19, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (3473 - 4102, n=3) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Desktop (233 - 346, n=19, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (286 - 292, n=3) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Intel Core i9-9900K | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
Average of class Desktop (82 - 564, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (121.1 - 128.3, n=2) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Average of class Desktop (24351 - 158242, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (96960 - 97671, n=2) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Desktop (5262 - 8211, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (6571 - 6580, n=2) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (17698 - 17854, n=2) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Average of class Desktop (4734 - 24033, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-11900K |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Desktop (1649 - 2507, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (1969 - 2042, n=2) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-10900K |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (29 - 30, n=2) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average of class Desktop (6.92 - 44, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Average of class Desktop (33.6 - 83.9, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (38.1 - 40.6, n=2) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Intel Core i9-10900K | |
Intel Core i9-11900K | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (0.3946 - 0.4216, n=2) | |
Average of class Desktop (0.3414 - 0.53, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Desktop | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Desktop (6011 - 62786, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (12739 - 13345, n=3) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average of class Desktop (27835 - 264044, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (58406 - 59419, n=3) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Desktop (1909 - 10362, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (4796 - 5127, n=3) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average of class Desktop (46554 - 205588, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (112066 - 112694, n=3) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average of class Desktop (4656 - 32855, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (14590 - 14664, n=3) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average of class Desktop (16325 - 138291, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (35801 - 39323, n=3) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Desktop (66023 - 379659, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (94062 - 140055, n=3) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (1537 - 1608, n=3) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average of class Desktop (347 - 2441, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Desktop (3442 - 33821, n=13, last 2 years) | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (7586 - 8283, n=3) | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
Intel Core i9-12900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900K (33311 - 49236, n=3) | |
Average of class Desktop (25669 - 54037, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Intel Core i9-11900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, NVIDIA Titan RTX |
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
We take a look at the system under constant load using the Cinebench-R15 Multi loop. In this way, we can determine whether the cooling system is powerful enough to cool the processor effectively. In the Corsair One i300, the work of the AiO is very reliable, and the result remains constant even after 50 runs. However, the slightly lower TDP of the Intel Core i9-12900K is clearly noticeable here. If you let the Core i9-12900K run free from the limitations, it can achieve almost 500 points more.
System Performance
During our testing period, the whole system ran very fast. This is also reflected in the system benchmarks. In the PCMark 10 tests, the Corsair One i300 takes the lead in all the individual tests. Only in the render tests, the Corsair One i300 isn't quite able to keep up due to the graphics card. The Nvidia Titan RTX of the comparison systems is the better choice here, which is due to the closeness to the quad series.
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
Room GPUs-only | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K | |
Sala GPUs-only | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Intel Core i9-12900K | |
Intel Core i9-9900K |
PCMark 10 Score | 8897 points | |
Help |
Storage Solution
In our test unit, Corsair uses a fast NVMe SSD with 2 TB of storage. With this, users will get sufficient storage space to install several games without any trouble. In the test, the Samsung SSD was able to impress us with very high transfer rates. There is no additional conventional hard drive as was still the case in the Corsair One i160. The system can also be expanded with additional M.2 SSDs. However, if you want to add them, you should have some tinkering experience, since the space inside the case is very limited.
Unfortunately, the compact case does not offer space for any other storage modules.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | |
Average of class Desktop | |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | |
Intel Beast Canyon NUC | |
Corsair One i160 -8! | |
Zotac Magnus One (ECM73070C) |