Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC512HFJD

PM9E1 MZVLC512HFJD

The Samsung MZVLC512HFJD is a 512-GB PM9E1 series SSD. PM9E1 drives debuted in H2 2024 as PCIe 5 NVMe storage available in a variety of flavors, like the 2-TB MZVLC2T0HBLD or the 1-TB MZVLC1T0HFLU.

Performance

For an upper-mid-range product, let alone a premium one, the 22 by 80 drive delivers fairly unimpressive sequential read and write rates of 5.32 GB/s and 3.46 GB/s (tested using AS SSD in December 2025). The 1-TB sister model isn't a whole lot faster, but the 2-TB one is.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity512 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced04.10.2024
LinkSamsung PM9E1 MZVLC512HFJD

Benchmarks

AS SSD - Copy Game
1934.9 MB/s (32%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
791.2 MB/s (29%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
2722.5 MB/s (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
4902 Points (30%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
2990 Points (41%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
1314 Points (21%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
0 ms (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
0.1 ms (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
2481 MB/s (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
713 MB/s (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
163.1 MB/s (32%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
68.5 MB/s (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
3457 MB/s (31%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
5322 MB/s (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
128.2 MB/s (29%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
68.2 MB/s (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
377 MB/s (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
747 MB/s (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
3541 MB/s (35%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
3959 MB/s (52%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
5570 MB/s (38%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
7136 MB/s (44%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
7106 MB/s (44%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
010020030040050060070080090010001100120013001400150016001700180019002000210022002300240025002600270028002900300031003200330034003500360037003800390040004100420043004400450046004700480049005000510052005300540055005600570058005900600061006200630064006500660067006800690070007100Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 18. 23:25:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 14 Dec 2025 00:24:59 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.797s ... 0.798s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.798s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4343 +0.002s ... 0.8s

#7 got single benchmarks 4343 +0.004s ... 0.804s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.804s

#9 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.811s

#10 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.044s ... 0.855s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.04s ... 0.895s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.037s ... 0.932s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.041s ... 0.972s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.038s ... 1.011s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.039s ... 1.049s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.034s ... 1.083s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.038s ... 1.121s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.037s ... 1.159s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.042s ... 1.2s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.039s ... 1.239s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.039s ... 1.279s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.04s ... 1.319s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.034s ... 1.353s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.024s ... 1.377s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 1.397s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 1.417s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 1.438s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.019s ... 1.457s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.019s ... 1.476s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.018s ... 1.494s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.019s ... 1.513s

#32 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 1.532s

#33 return log +0.001s ... 1.533s

No reviews found for this CPU (yet).

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-12-18)