Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

990 Pro 2 TB

The Samsung 990 PRO PCIe 4.0 SSD 2TB MZVL72T0HDLB is a high-end solid-state drive that offers exceptional speed and performance in the M.2 2280 form factor. With support for PCIe 4.0, it takes advantage of the latest technology to deliver fast speeds.

This SSD provides a significant speed boost compared to its predecessor, the 980 PRO. It boasts impressive random read and write speeds, with up to 1400K/1550K IOPS (input/output operations per second), making it 40% and 55% faster, respectively, than the 980 PRO. Additionally, its sequential read and write speeds can reach up to 7450/6900 MB/s, approaching the maximum performance capabilities of PCIe 4.0.

The Samsung 990 PRO is designed to shine in various demanding tasks such as gaming, video editing, 3D editing, data analysis, and more. Its exceptional speed ensures smooth and responsive performance.

With its high capacity of 2TB, this SSD offers ample storage space for your files, games, and applications.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity2048 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced29.05.2023

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
34.7 pt (39%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.719 -98%
...
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X162N
33.9 -2%
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162
33.9 -2%
Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV1T02
33.9 -2%
WDC PC SN810 1TB
34.3 -1%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
34.3 -1%
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
34.3 -1%
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
34.5 -1%
1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0)
34.5 -1%
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
34.6 0%
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
34.7
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
34.7 0%
WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-1T00
34.9 1%
Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0
35 1%
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
35.3 2%
SK Hynix HFS002TEJ9X162N
36.1 4%
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
36.2 4%
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
36.3 5%
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
36.4 5%
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
36.5 5%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5
88.1 154%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 1771.82     avg: 2436     median: 2107.1 (35%)     max: 3429.48 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 949.91     avg: 1111     median: 1137.6 (42%)     max: 1245.13 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 2504.54     avg: 3813     median: 3154.7 (12%)     max: 5780.64 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 6169     avg: 7545     median: 6632 (41%)     max: 10745 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 4177     avg: 4394     median: 4331.5 (60%)     max: 4734 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1345     avg: 2103     median: 1542.5 (25%)     max: 3980 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.013     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.02 ms
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.017     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.052 ms
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 3540     avg: 3729     median: 3730.6 (63%)     max: 3914.78 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 711     avg: 1515     median: 977.6 (19%)     max: 3395.18 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 192.8     avg: 231.7     median: 213.3 (42%)     max: 307.45 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 64.2     avg: 74.8     median: 78.2 (25%)     max: 78.73 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 3714     avg: 4328     median: 4239.1 (37%)     max: 5118.67 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 4336     avg: 5121     median: 5300.3 (42%)     max: 5548 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 118.2     avg: 195.8     median: 168.4 (15%)     max: 328.4 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 55.8     avg: 74.5     median: 80.1 (2%)     max: 82.14 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 4239     avg: 4700     median: 4699.5 (25%)     max: 5160 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 3384     avg: 3415     median: 3415 (41%)     max: 3446 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 463     avg: 589     median: 518.9 (11%)     max: 853.3 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 459     avg: 602     median: 492.5 (7%)     max: 962.4 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 6795     avg: 6877     median: 6880.5 (46%)     max: 6953 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 7060     avg: 7109     median: 7124.5 (38%)     max: 7127 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
min: 388     avg: 491.5     median: 491.5 (10%)     max: 595 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
min: 798     avg: 1005     median: 1004.5 (15%)     max: 1211 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 111.3     avg: 195.1     median: 158.5 (36%)     max: 352 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 59.7     avg: 71     median: 71.9 (21%)     max: 80.7 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 464     avg: 1589     median: 511 (8%)     max: 4869 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 1009     avg: 2206     median: 1040.5 (13%)     max: 5735 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 3727     avg: 4255     median: 4097 (40%)     max: 5099 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2985     avg: 3258     median: 3298.5 (43%)     max: 3449 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 6801     avg: 6873     median: 6871.5 (47%)     max: 6947 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 5761     avg: 6455     median: 6477.5 (40%)     max: 7102 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 5739     avg: 6353     median: 6300.5 (39%)     max: 7072 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900200021002200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400350036003700380039004000410042004300440045004600470048004900500051005200530054005500560057005800590060006100620063006400650066006700680069007000Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 08. 13:10:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 03 Nov 2025 23:29:02 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4004 +0.018s ... 0.024s

#7 got single benchmarks 4004 +0.014s ... 0.037s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.903s ... 0.94s

#10 return log +0.001s ... 0.941s

Notebook reviews with Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

XMG Core 16 M25 review - AMD gaming laptop with 300 Hz display and RTX 5070

XMG Core 16 M25 review - AMD gaming laptop with 300 Hz display and RTX 5070

The XMG Core 16 M25 is a mid-range gaming laptop that could easily pass as an office device. Its 300 Hz display is driven by an AMD Zen 5 processor and the new ...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.1 kg
German competitor to the Legion 5: XMG Core 15 (M25) gaming laptop review

German competitor to the Legion 5: XMG Core 15 (M25) gaming laptop review

Similar to its predecessor, Schenker Technologies pairs an AMD processor with an Nvidia dedicated graphics card in the XMG Core 15 M25. Our review shows how thi...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | 15.30" | 1.9 kg
Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) review - Compact AMD subnotebook now with Ryzen 8000 and brighter display

Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) review - Compact AMD subnotebook now with Ryzen 8000 and brighter display

The Schenker VIA 14 Pro has been updated and now comes with the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and a brighter IPS display. The manufacturer has also taken the criticism of ...
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | AMD Radeon 780M | 14.00" | 1.4 kg
Schenker Key 17 Pro (Early 23) review: 4k gaming notebook with Core i9 and RTX 4090

Schenker Key 17 Pro (Early 23) review: 4k gaming notebook with Core i9 and RTX 4090

This 17.3-inch Schenker laptop is one of the most powerful of its kind on the market right now. Featuring a Core i9-13900HX and an RTX 4090 Laptop, the device i...
Intel Core i9-13900HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 3.4 kg

Schenker XMG Core 16 M25: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » XMG's Core 16 M25 AMD is a good all-rounder for gaming and work

   » Who offers the better RTX 5070 gaming laptop for €2,200? - XMG Core 16 vs. Asus TUF Gaming A16

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-08- 8)