Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

990 Pro 2 TB

The Samsung 990 PRO PCIe 4.0 SSD 2TB MZVL72T0HDLB is a high-end solid-state drive that offers exceptional speed and performance in the M.2 2280 form factor. With support for PCIe 4.0, it takes advantage of the latest technology to deliver fast speeds.

This SSD provides a significant speed boost compared to its predecessor, the 980 PRO. It boasts impressive random read and write speeds, with up to 1400K/1550K IOPS (input/output operations per second), making it 40% and 55% faster, respectively, than the 980 PRO. Additionally, its sequential read and write speeds can reach up to 7450/6900 MB/s, approaching the maximum performance capabilities of PCIe 4.0.

The Samsung 990 PRO is designed to shine in various demanding tasks such as gaming, video editing, 3D editing, data analysis, and more. Its exceptional speed ensures smooth and responsive performance.

With its high capacity of 2TB, this SSD offers ample storage space for your files, games, and applications.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity2048 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced29.05.2023

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
49.7 pt (56%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.687 -99%
...
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
45.9 -8%
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
46.1 -7%
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
46.2 -7%
SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X186N
46.2 -7%
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
46.6 -6%
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E
47.1 -5%
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
47.2 -5%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
47.6 -4%
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
47.8 -4%
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
49.7
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G
50.9 2%
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
51.1 3%
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
51.1 3%
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus 2TB
51.3 3%
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
51.3 3%
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
51.9 4%
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
56.6 14%
SK Hynix PC811 HFS002TEM9X152N
57.8 16%
3x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB (RAID 0)
59 19%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 8TB
88.2 77%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 664.71     avg: 2066     median: 2107.1 (35%)     max: 3429.48 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 929.56     avg: 1044     median: 957 (36%)     max: 1245.13 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 2504.54     avg: 3505     median: 3154.7 (12%)     max: 5780.64 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 6169     avg: 8368     median: 8475 (52%)     max: 10745 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 4071     avg: 4430     median: 4469 (62%)     max: 4734 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1345     avg: 2616     median: 2516 (40%)     max: 3980 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.013     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.021 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.017     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.052 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 3307     avg: 3729     median: 3892 (66%)     max: 3990.23 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 711     avg: 2013     median: 1881 (37%)     max: 3395.18 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 175     avg: 221.4     median: 211 (41%)     max: 307.45 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 64.2     avg: 75.7     median: 77.8 (25%)     max: 81.9 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 3714     avg: 4793     median: 5118.7 (45%)     max: 5590 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 4336     avg: 5276     median: 5508.1 (43%)     max: 5548 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 118.2     avg: 213.4     median: 222.8 (20%)     max: 328.4 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 55.8     avg: 79     median: 80.3 (2%)     max: 92.9 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 4239     avg: 5087     median: 5160 (28%)     max: 5862 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 3228     avg: 3353     median: 3384 (38%)     max: 3446 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 447.4     avg: 570     median: 519.7 (11%)     max: 853.3 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 459     avg: 636     median: 589.4 (9%)     max: 962.4 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 6795     avg: 6907     median: 6938 (46%)     max: 6958 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 7060     avg: 7136     median: 7124 (38%)     max: 7288 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
min: 388     avg: 1882     median: 1902 (38%)     max: 3335 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
min: 798     avg: 2302     median: 2386.5 (36%)     max: 3638 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 111.3     avg: 214.5     median: 216 (50%)     max: 352 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 59.7     avg: 77.2     median: 78.5 (23%)     max: 89.2 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 464     avg: 2728     median: 3494 (52%)     max: 4869 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 1009     avg: 3703     median: 5619 (69%)     max: 5739 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 3727     avg: 4909     median: 5099 (49%)     max: 5884 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2985     avg: 3612     median: 3449 (41%)     max: 4258 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 6801     avg: 6911     median: 6947 (48%)     max: 6969 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 5761     avg: 6395     median: 6355 (39%)     max: 7390 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 5732     avg: 6336     median: 6298 (39%)     max: 7444 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
010020030040050060070080090010001100120013001400150016001700180019002000210022002300240025002600270028002900300031003200330034003500360037003800390040004100420043004400450046004700480049005000510052005300540055005600570058005900600061006200630064006500660067006800690070007100720073007400Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 22. 16:45:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Mar 2026 04:00:04 +0100 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4004 +0.036s ... 0.044s

#7 got single benchmarks 4004 +0.021s ... 0.065s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +4.326s ... 4.391s

#10 return log +0.126s ... 4.518s

Notebook reviews with Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

XMG Apex 17 M25 on the desk

XMG Apex 17 review: RTX 5060 laptop with Ryzen 9 9955HX even outruns some RTX 5070 rivals

With the Apex 17 (Clevo V370FNNW-MG), XMG sticks to its formula: maximum performance, no frills. A Ryzen 9 9955HX meets a fully unleashed RTX 5060 — all starting at €1,899. But is raw performance alone enough to compete with other RTX 5060 machines and even some RTX 5070 laptops?
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 17.3", 2.8 kg
XMG Evo 15 (M25) laptop review - A good Windows alternative to the MacBook Air 15?

XMG Evo 15 (M25) laptop review - A good Windows alternative to the MacBook Air 15?

The XMG Evo 15 is a slim 15-inch laptop featuring Intel Arrow Lake, a bright matte IPS display, and solid overall features. It is a capable all-rounder with no major weaknesses and is available with either an Intel or an AMD processor. Update: SSD & SD-Express performance
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, 15.3", 1.8 kg
Challenge to the Lenovo Legion: XMG Core 16 VE (M25) gaming laptop review

Challenge to the Lenovo Legion: XMG Core 16 VE (M25) gaming laptop review

The XMG Core 16 VE aims to compete not only with budget gaming laptops, but also with premium models such as the Lenovo Legion 7. Read our review to find out whether it succeeds.
AMD Ryzen 7 255, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 16", 2.1 kg
XMG Core 16 M25 review - AMD gaming laptop with 300 Hz display and RTX 5070

XMG Core 16 M25 review - AMD gaming laptop with 300 Hz display and RTX 5070

The XMG Core 16 M25 is a mid-range gaming laptop that could easily pass as an office device. Its 300 Hz display is driven by an AMD Zen 5 processor and the new GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, and it supports up to 128 GB of RAM.
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16", 2.1 kg
German competitor to the Legion 5: XMG Core 15 (M25) gaming laptop review

German competitor to the Legion 5: XMG Core 15 (M25) gaming laptop review

Similar to its predecessor, Schenker Technologies pairs an AMD processor with an Nvidia dedicated graphics card in the XMG Core 15 M25. Our review shows how this 15-inch gaming laptop stacks up against global competitors such as Lenovo.
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.3", 1.9 kg

Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24): AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) review - Compact AMD subnotebook now with Ryzen 8000 and brighter display

Schenker Key 17 Pro (Early 23): Intel Core i9-13900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 17.30", 3.4 kg
  Review » Schenker Key 17 Pro (Early 23) review: 4k gaming notebook with Core i9 and RTX 4090

Schenker XMG Apex 17 M25: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 17.30", 2.8 kg
   » Content creator hidden gem? QHD display in the XMG Apex 17 delivers extremely accurate colors after calibration

   » RTX 5060 laptop runs 60% quieter in Entertainment Mode with only 12% performance loss: XMG Apex 17 tested

   » XMG Apex 17 gets significantly more expensive: fastest RTX 5060 laptop now starts above €2,000

   » CPU king in gaming laptops: XMG Apex 17 with Ryzen 9 9955HX beats all RTX 5060 and RTX 5070 rivals

   » RTX 5060 beats RTX 5070: XMG Apex 17 surprises with unexpectedly strong gaming performance

Schenker XMG Core 16 M25: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 16.00", 2.1 kg
   » XMG's Core 16 M25 AMD is a good all-rounder for gaming and work

   » Who offers the better RTX 5070 gaming laptop for €2,200? - XMG Core 16 vs. Asus TUF Gaming A16

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-08- 8)