Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) review - Compact AMD subnotebook now with Ryzen 8000 and brighter display
Schenker has updated its compact AMD subnotebook VIA 14 Pro and compared to the old model (we tested the Linux version - Tuxedo Pulse 14), a new processor, a brighter display, and a new coating for the case, which should be less susceptible to dirt.
The base price for the Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) is €1,099 with a three-year warranty (without operating system). For this, it comes standard with the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 32 GB RAM, a 500 GB SSD, and the matte 2.8K IPS panel as standard. Our test configuration is configured with the 2 TB version of the Samsung 990 Pro and the Windows pre-installation, which raises the price to €1,275.
In this article, we will focus on the differences to the old model, the brighter display, and, of course, the performance and the effects on emissions. Comprehensive information on the case, features, and input devices can be found in our review of the Tuxedo Pulse 14.
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.1 % | v8 | 07/2024 | SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
83.5 % | v8 | 06/2024 | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 17.08 mm | 14.20" | 2880x1920 | |
85.5 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.6 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.1 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
89 % | v7 (old) | 01/2024 | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. Further information can be found here.
Differences to the predecessor
Basically, nothing has changed on the casing. One point of criticism from us when testing the Tuxedo Pulse 14 was the very sensitive surfaces, on which fingerprints and dirt were quickly visible and cleaning was also not easy. To counteract this problem, a new coating is now being used to reduce fingerprints. The result is also slightly better, but fingerprints are still better and you will have to clean the case often. We would still like to see an additional silver-colored version.
We noticed the green status LED of the webcam on the Tuxedo Pulse 14, which also led to a slight green shimmer in the pictures. The Via 14 Pro, on the other hand, uses a white LED, which is also not noticeable in the pictures. However, the image quality of the 720p webcam remains poor overall.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) |
Networking | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Display - IPS panel is now brighter
The VIA 14 Pro still relies on a matt IPS panel with a resolution of 2,880 x 1,800 pixels in 16:10 format and a frequency of 120 Hz. It is the same panel ID as the Tuxedo Pulse 14, but the brightness has been increased. Schenker specifies 400 cd/m², but our test device clearly exceeds this specification with an average of 467 cd/m². This also makes it over 100 cd/m² brighter than the Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3. The black level is a good 0.29 cd/m², which results in a very good contrast ratio of around 1,600:1.
The subjective image impression of the panel is decent overall and bright areas still appear slightly grainy, and there are also slight halos. PWM is not used and the response times are inconspicuous, but not particularly fast.
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 466 cd/m²
Contrast: 1607:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
72.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 1% | 21% | 27% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.1 | 72.42 3% | 70.3 0% | 98.6 41% | 99.9 43% | 71.1 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.7 | 99.79 2% | 99.7 2% | 99.9 2% | 100 2% | 98.7 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.3 | 73.94 2% | 72.1 0% | 87.3 21% | 98.9 37% | 73.2 1% |
Response Times | 24% | 3% | 95% | 97% | -29% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.1 ? | 7 ? 77% | 32.7 ? -5% | 1.31 ? 96% | 0.61 ? 98% | 37.9 ? -22% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17.1 ? | 22 ? -29% | 15.2 ? 11% | 1.2 ? 93% | 0.67 ? 96% | 23.1 ? -35% |
PWM Frequency | 238 ? | 480 ? | 240 ? | |||
Screen | 181% | 13% | 320% | -5% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 466 | 373 -20% | 418 -10% | 387 -17% | 411 -12% | 340 -27% |
Brightness | 467 | 377 -19% | 408 -13% | 386 -17% | 414 -11% | 338 -28% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 94 0% | 90 -4% | 98 4% | 99 5% | 84 -11% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.015 95% | 0.3 -3% | 0.01 97% | 0.16 45% | |
Contrast | 1607 | 24867 1447% | 1393 -13% | 38700 2308% | 2125 32% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.47 41% | 1.6 36% | 1 60% | 2.8 -12% | 1.7 32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.1 | 2.49 59% | 2.5 59% | 2.4 61% | 5.5 10% | 3 51% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 1.78 -37% | 1.1 15% | 2.2 -69% | 1.3 -0% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 1.7 59% | 2 51% | 1.4 66% | 1.8 56% | 2.9 29% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.179 101% | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 7386 88% | 6556 99% | 6851 95% | 6466 101% | 6319 103% | 6729 97% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 69% /
120% | 6% /
9% | 145% /
217% | 40% /
20% | -5% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
We measured the panel with the professional CalMAN software and ex-works the panel has a visible blue cast in conjunction with a color temperature that is too cool, although this has a positive effect on the maximum brightness. However, the display of the colors is already okay. With our calibration (profile is available for free download above), we can significantly improve the display, but the maximum brightness drops to around 425 cd/m². Together with the full sRGB coverage, the notebook is also suitable for editing images/videos.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 10.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.9 ms rise | |
↘ 16.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17365 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Apart from direct sunlight, the matte panel can also be used outdoors on bright days. The viewing angle stability of the IPS screen is good.
Performance - AMD Ryzen 8000 and 32 GB RAM
Test conditions
The VIA 14 Pro (M24) is the first notebook from Schenker without a Command Center; instead, the energy profiles can be switched via the F3 key. The active energy profile is then briefly displayed on the screen. A total of three profiles are available: Quiet, Balanced, and Performance. We have summarized the corresponding TDP values and performance data in the following table. We have carried out the following benchmarks and measurements with the Performance profile.
Energy profile | CPU TDP | CB R23 Multi | Time Spy Graphics | max. Fan volume |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quiet | 25 -> 15 watts | 10,593 points | 2,492 points | 30.6 dB(A) |
Balanced | 45 -> 35 watts | 15,250 points | 2,877 points | 36.2 dB(A) |
Power | 54 watts | 16,330 points | 2,915 points | 43.6 dB(A) |
Processor - Ryzen 7 8845HS
The processor was changed from the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS to the Ryzen 7 8845HS, which still uses 8 Zen4 cores (16 threads) with a maximum clock speed of 5.1 GHz. Unsurprisingly, the performance is therefore also comparable and all comparison devices are very close together overall. The performance is very good in both the multi-core and single-core tests and there are no bottlenecks here, even with demanding tasks. In battery mode, the maximum consumption is limited to 35 watts, which is why the multi-core performance is 12% lower.
Further CPU benchmarks can be found here.
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (15889 - 18037, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 21058, n=59, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1111 - 2001, n=59, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (6231 - 7026, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2234 - 8233, n=55, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (677 - 698, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (408 - 790, n=55, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2537 - 2908, n=6) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (953 - 3345, n=61, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (151.5 - 307, n=56, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (163 - 597, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64759 - 74664, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (26799 - 75402, n=52, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4341 - 6403, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=10) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6796 - 15059, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2540 - 2698, n=8) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2003 - 3130, n=43, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11754 - 12726, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5688 - 14608, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=7) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1426 - 2350, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=6) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6.2 - 21.3, n=54, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.5 - 77, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 98.5, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 0.77, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4336 - 0.4935, n=6) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (25916 - 29544, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4588 - 32888, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (107613 - 125873, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (20465 - 123315, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4627 - 5180, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1238 - 5287, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (114899 - 124695, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (47816 - 115682, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14876 - 15519, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1518 - 18418, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (57671 - 67367, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11546 - 65433, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (67393 - 172642, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (24950 - 161430, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (406 - 1379, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (13875 - 15911, n=6) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1459 - 17495, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (38580 - 41668, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14337 - 53954, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
System performance
The results in the system benchmarks are good overall and the VIA 14 Pro was always a responsive companion in everyday use. Although the RAM cannot be upgraded, 32 GB is already installed as standard, which should be sufficient for the vast majority of users for years to come.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (7120 - 7641, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4528 - 7646, n=48, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10685 - 11570, n=4) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9143 - 11331, n=48, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9787 - 10482, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10449, n=48, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9367 - 10009, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4220 - 10983, n=48, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1779 - 1939, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1027 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1716 - 1872, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (980 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1942 - 2040, n=4) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1102 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1523 - 1849, n=4) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (958 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=4) | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (225 - 448, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 266, n=4) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (176.4 - 325, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 707, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 531, n=4) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7120 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (67615 - 69523, n=6) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 96791, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 122210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (85464 - 93239, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 107658, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (85.6 - 107.1, n=6) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
In our standardized latency test (surfing the Internet, 4K YouTube playback, CPU load), the test device with the current BIOS version shows no limitations. Although one driver fails slightly, the important interrupt-to-process latency value is very low.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 | |
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
The VIA 14 Pro offers two fast PCIe 4.0 slots for M.2 2280 SSDs. A 500 GB SSD is installed in the basic configuration, but our test device contains the 2 TB version of the Samsung 990 Pro (surcharge 138 euros). The 990 Pro achieves high transfer rates and the performance remains completely stable even under prolonged load. After the initial start-up, the user has 1.76 TB at their disposal. Further SSD benchmarks can be found here.