Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) review - Compact AMD subnotebook now with Ryzen 8000 and brighter display

Name: SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24)
Brand: SCHENKER

Many ports and good maintenance options.

The Schenker VIA 14 Pro has been updated and now comes with the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and a brighter IPS display. The manufacturer has also taken the criticism of the dirt-prone casing to heart and now uses a different coating. The extensive connectivity and the two slots for M.2 SSDs have been retained.

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Anton Avdyushkin (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/12/2024 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...

AMD AI Laptop Ultrabook Windows Zen 4

Schenker has updated its compact AMD subnotebook VIA 14 Pro and compared to the old model (we tested the Linux version - Tuxedo Pulse 14), a new processor, a brighter display, and a new coating for the case, which should be less susceptible to dirt.

The base price for the Schenker VIA 14 Pro (M24) is €1,099 with a three-year warranty (without operating system). For this, it comes standard with the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, 32 GB RAM, a 500 GB SSD, and the matte 2.8K IPS panel as standard. Our test configuration is configured with the 2 TB version of the Samsung 990 Pro and the Windows pre-installation, which raises the price to €1,275.

In this article, we will focus on the differences to the old model, the brighter display, and, of course, the performance and the effects on emissions. Comprehensive information on the case, features, and input devices can be found in our review of the Tuxedo Pulse 14.

Test device courtesy of Schenker Technologies

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

VIA 14 Pro (M24) Performance 54W

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, 54 W PL2 / Short Burst, 54 W PL1 / Sustained, Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 780M, Core: 2700 MHz, RAM: 1067 MHz, Adrenalin 24.5.1

Memory

32 GB

, LPDDR5x-6400, Dual-Channel. onboard

Display

14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, glossy: no, 120 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB, 2048 GB

, 1802 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: microSD

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18.5 x 313.5 x 222 ( = 0.73 x 12.34 x 8.74 in)

Battery

60 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: HD + IR
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 100W PSU, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

1.4 kg ( = 49.38 oz / 3.09 pounds), Power Supply: 260 g ( = 9.17 oz / 0.57 pounds)

Price

1275 Euro

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.1 %	v8	07 / 2024	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1.4 kg	18.5 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
83.5 %	v8	06 / 2024	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.3 kg	17.08 mm	14.20"	2880x1920
85.5 %	v8	07 / 2024	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1.4 kg	15.9 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
88.6 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05 / 2024	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	1.2 kg	14.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1200
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	03 / 2024	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1.5 kg	16 mm	14.00"	2880x1800
89 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	01 / 2024	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1.4 kg	18 mm	14.00"	2880x1800

Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. Further information can be found here.

Differences to the predecessor

Even the new coating cannot completely prevent fingerprints.

Basically, nothing has changed on the casing. One point of criticism from us when testing the Tuxedo Pulse 14 was the very sensitive surfaces, on which fingerprints and dirt were quickly visible and cleaning was also not easy. To counteract this problem, a new coating is now being used to reduce fingerprints. The result is also slightly better, but fingerprints are still better and you will have to clean the case often. We would still like to see an additional silver-colored version.

We noticed the green status LED of the webcam on the Tuxedo Pulse 14, which also led to a slight green shimmer in the pictures. The Via 14 Pro, on the other hand, uses a white LED, which is also not noticeable in the pictures. However, the image quality of the 720p webcam remains poor overall.

Size comparison

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA DIN A4 ❌

Left: USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT mode 1.4a, Power Delivery), HDMI 2.0b, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 GBit/s), USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort ALT mode 1.4a)

Right: Kensington Lock (Nano Saver), microSD reader, USB-A 3.2 Gen.1 (5 Gbit/s), 3.5 mm audio

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	76.2 MB/s +314%
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=15, last 2 years)	53.6 MB/s +191%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.5 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	18.4 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	90.8 MB/s +304%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=15, last 2 years)	69.7 MB/s +210%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	23.6 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	22.5 MB/s

Networking
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1257 (min: 1208) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1625 (min: 1557) MBit/s ∼95%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	968 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	951 (min: 782) MBit/s ∼56%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1416 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1667 (min: 1606) MBit/s ∼97%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1737 (min: 1638) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1712 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 MediaTek RZ616
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1746 (min: 1647) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1706 (min: 1678) MBit/s ∼100%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 MediaTek RZ608
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	943 (min: 884) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	949 (min: 932) MBit/s ∼55%

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1257 (1208-1302)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1625 (1557-1675)

ColorChecker SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24): 14.94 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.35 ∆E

Display - IPS panel is now brighter

The VIA 14 Pro still relies on a matt IPS panel with a resolution of 2,880 x 1,800 pixels in 16:10 format and a frequency of 120 Hz. It is the same panel ID as the Tuxedo Pulse 14, but the brightness has been increased. Schenker specifies 400 cd/m², but our test device clearly exceeds this specification with an average of 467 cd/m². This also makes it over 100 cd/m² brighter than the Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3. The black level is a good 0.29 cd/m², which results in a very good contrast ratio of around 1,600:1.

The subjective image impression of the panel is decent overall and bright areas still appear slightly grainy, and there are also slight halos. PWM is not used and the response times are inconspicuous, but not particularly fast.


474 cd/m²	478 cd/m²	483 cd/m²
462 cd/m²	466 cd/m²	469 cd/m²
452 cd/m²	467 cd/m²	454 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

TL140ADXP24-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 483 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 467.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 466 cd/m²
Contrast: 1607:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
72.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T EDO0142, OLED, 2880x1920, 14.2"	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14"	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"
Display		2%	1%	21%	27%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	70.1	72.42 3%	70.3 0%	98.6 41%	99.9 43%	71.1 1%
sRGB Coverage	97.7	99.79 2%	99.7 2%	99.9 2%	100 2%	98.7 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	72.3	73.94 2%	72.1 0%	87.3 21%	98.9 37%	73.2 1%
Response Times		24%	3%	95%	97%	-29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	31.1 ?(14.9, 16.2)	7 ?(3.5, 3.5) 77%	32.7 ?(14.8, 17.9) -5%	1.31 ?(0.69, 0.62) 96%	0.61 ?(0.31, 0.3) 98%	37.9 ?(17.4, 20.5) -22%
Response Time Black / White *	17.1 ?(7, 10.1)	22 ?(18.5, 3.5) -29%	15.2 ?(5.1, 10.1) 11%	1.2 ?(0.61, 0.59) 93%	0.67 ?(0.34, 0.33) 96%	23.1 ?(11.4, 11.7) -35%
PWM Frequency		238 ?(100)		480 ?(99)	240 ?(99)
PWM Amplitude *		57
Screen		181%	13%	320%	-5%	14%
Brightness middle	466	373 -20%	418 -10%	387 -17%	411 -12%	340 -27%
Brightness	467	377 -19%	408 -13%	386 -17%	414 -11%	338 -28%
Brightness Distribution	94	94 0%	90 -4%	98 4%	99 5%	84 -11%
Black Level *	0.29	0.015 95%	0.3 -3%	0.01 97%		0.16 45%
Contrast	1607	24867 1447%	1393 -13%	38700 2308%		2125 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	1.47 41%	1.6 36%	1 60%	2.8 -12%	1.7 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.1	2.49 59%	2.5 59%	2.4 61%	5.5 10%	3 51%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.3	1.78 -37%	1.1 15%		2.2 -69%	1.3 -0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.1	1.7 59%	2 51%	1.4 66%	1.8 56%	2.9 29%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.179 ^101%	2.14 ^103%	2.24 ^98%	2.21 ^100%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	7386 ^88%	6556 ^99%	6851 ^95%	6466 ^101%	6319 ^103%	6729 ^97%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		69% / 120%	6% / 9%	145% / 217%	40% / 20%	-5% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

We measured the panel with the professional CalMAN software and ex-works the panel has a visible blue cast in conjunction with a color temperature that is too cool, although this has a positive effect on the maximum brightness. However, the display of the colors is already okay. With our calibration (profile is available for free download above), we can significantly improve the display, but the maximum brightness drops to around 425 cd/m². Together with the full sRGB coverage, the notebook is also suitable for editing images/videos.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
17.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.9 ms rise
31.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Outdoors (bright day, no direct sunlight)

Apart from direct sunlight, the matte panel can also be used outdoors on bright days. The viewing angle stability of the IPS screen is good.

Performance - AMD Ryzen 8000 and 32 GB RAM

Test conditions

The VIA 14 Pro (M24) is the first notebook from Schenker without a Command Center; instead, the energy profiles can be switched via the F3 key. The active energy profile is then briefly displayed on the screen. A total of three profiles are available: Quiet, Balanced, and Performance. We have summarized the corresponding TDP values and performance data in the following table. We have carried out the following benchmarks and measurements with the Performance profile.

Energy profile	CPU TDP	CB R23 Multi	Time Spy Graphics	max. Fan volume
Quiet	25 -> 15 watts	10,593 points	2,492 points	30.6 dB(A)
Balanced	45 -> 35 watts	15,250 points	2,877 points	36.2 dB(A)
Power	54 watts	16,330 points	2,915 points	43.6 dB(A)

Processor - Ryzen 7 8845HS

The processor was changed from the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS to the Ryzen 7 8845HS, which still uses 8 Zen4 cores (16 threads) with a maximum clock speed of 5.1 GHz. Unsurprisingly, the performance is therefore also comparable and all comparison devices are very close together overall. The performance is very good in both the multi-core and single-core tests and there are no bottlenecks here, even with demanding tasks. In battery mode, the maximum consumption is limited to 35 watts, which is why the multi-core performance is 12% lower.

Further CPU benchmarks can be found here.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2543 (2508.31-2568.38)

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2224 (2132.08-2595.21)

Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2436 (2302.42-2731.12)

Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS: Ø2166 (2149.96-2176.16)

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS: Ø2535 (2513.19-2555.42)

Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2424 (2389.2-2482.31)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	85.6 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	84.9 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	84.1 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	83.2 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	81.4 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	80.5 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	78.3 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	68.5 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17077 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	16387 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14895 - 18037, n=13)	16165 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	16145 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	15889 Points -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	15515 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	13888 Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=74, last 2 years)	11766 Points -28%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1776 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1774 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1755 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1623 - 1783, n=13)	1751 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1746 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1742 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1716 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=74, last 2 years)	1691 Points -5%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6575 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6424 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5808 - 7026, n=13)	6317 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	6251 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6231 Points -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6061 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	5414 Points -16%
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=69, last 2 years)	4572 Points -29%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	690 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (673 - 698, n=13)	686 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	685 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	679 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	678 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	677 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	674 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=69, last 2 years)	642 Points -6%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2731 (2302.42^min - 2731.12^max) Points +6%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2595 (2132.08^min - 2595.21^max) Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2568 (2508.31^min - 2568.38^max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2342 - 2908, n=13)	2563 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2555 (2513.19^min - 2555.42^max) Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2482 (2389.2^min - 2482.31^max) Points -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2176 (2149.96^min - 2176.16^max) Points -15%
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=74, last 2 years)	1967 Points -23%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	280 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	277 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (269 - 283, n=13)	276 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	274 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	268 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	258 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=70, last 2 years)	254 Points -8%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	250 Points -10%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=71, last 2 years)	374 Seconds * -91%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	226 Seconds * -15%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	218 Seconds * -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	216 Seconds * -10%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	208 Seconds * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (179 - 216, n=13)	201 Seconds * -3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	196 Seconds *
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	193 Seconds * +2%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (62669 - 74664, n=13)	68390 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	68354 MIPS
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	67444 MIPS -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	66807 MIPS -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	65072 MIPS -5%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	61780 MIPS -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	61047 MIPS -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=65, last 2 years)	47117 MIPS -31%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6403 MIPS +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (5197 - 6714, n=13)	6319 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6278 MIPS
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	6274 MIPS 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	6205 MIPS -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=67, last 2 years)	5482 MIPS -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5372 MIPS -14%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	5245 MIPS -16%

Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13417 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12940 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12700 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11073 - 14014, n=18)	12854 Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	12796 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12643 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	12578 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 17489, n=75, last 2 years)	11793 Points -9%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	11279 Points -13%

Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (2510 - 2698, n=16)	2624 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2612 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2555 Points -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2604 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3820, n=70, last 2 years)	2581 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2552 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2540 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2372 Points -9%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	2369 Points -9%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13137 Points +12%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12189 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (11256 - 12726, n=15)	11906 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11802 Points 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11780 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	11754 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=66, last 2 years)	10305 Points -12%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	9897 Points -16%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1965 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1945 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	1942 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (1765 - 2004, n=15)	1931 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	1875 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=66, last 2 years)	1836 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1754 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	1750 Points -11%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	20.7 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (18.6 - 22.7, n=13)	20.1 fps -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	19.5 fps -6%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	19.4 fps -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	18.6 fps -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	17.3 fps -16%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	17 fps -18%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=68, last 2 years)	13 fps -37%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	79.2 s * -78%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=66, last 2 years)	54.5 s * -22%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (44.4 - 77, n=13)	50.7 s * -14%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	50.4 s * -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	47.8 s * -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	47.1 s * -6%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	44.5 s *
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	43.9 s * +1%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=68, last 2 years)	0.526 sec * -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.478 sec * -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	0.4753 sec * -1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4716 sec *
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	0.4521 sec * +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (0.4304 - 0.4935, n=13)	0.4511 sec * +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4477 sec * +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	0.4464 sec * +5%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

277 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2568 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

176.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.9 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

6424 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

685 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1774 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

16387 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

912 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

102 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	93.5 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	92.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	91.8 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	86.8 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76.1 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69.5 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	67.8 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	56.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	26362 KRay/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	25961 KRay/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (23708 - 29544, n=13)	25884 KRay/s -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	24712 KRay/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	22269 KRay/s -16%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	14196 KRay/s -46%
Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=68, last 2 years)	13219 KRay/s -50%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	13188 KRay/s -50%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	110027 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (99659 - 125873, n=13)	109195 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	107613 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	103755 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	93550 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	75664 Points -30%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	69098 Points -36%
Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=68, last 2 years)	59743 Points -44%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4732 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (4332 - 5180, n=13)	4712 MB/s 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	4646 MB/s -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	4627 MB/s -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	4132 MB/s -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3507 MB/s -26%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	3348 MB/s -29%
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=68, last 2 years)	2939 MB/s -38%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (109458 - 124695, n=13)	116365 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	115682 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	114899 Points -1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	114236 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	99874 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	89759 Points -22%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	82364 Points -29%
Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=68, last 2 years)	73422 Points -37%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	15226 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	14941 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (14062 - 15519, n=13)	14891 Points -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	14385 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	13731 Points -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9873 Points -35%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	9291 Points -39%
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=68, last 2 years)	7431 Points -51%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	58765 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (53436 - 67367, n=13)	58327 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	57671 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	55540 Points -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	49687 Points -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	37090 Points -36%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	33802 Points -41%
Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=68, last 2 years)	31183 Points -46%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	161430 MB/s +87%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	124284 MB/s +44%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (64515 - 172642, n=13)	93411 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	86256 MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76247 MB/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	73336 MB/s -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	67393 MB/s -22%
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=68, last 2 years)	56901 MB/s -34%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1085 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	1058 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	1021 MB/s -3%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	1005 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (627 - 1080, n=13)	992 MB/s -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=68, last 2 years)	742 MB/s -30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	627 MB/s -41%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	468 MB/s -56%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13999 KRay/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	13896 KRay/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (12361 - 15911, n=13)	13784 KRay/s -2%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	13100 KRay/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	11637 KRay/s -17%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	7521 KRay/s -46%
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=68, last 2 years)	7009 KRay/s -50%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	6835 KRay/s -51%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	51390 MPixel/s +33%
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=68, last 2 years)	42709 MPixel/s +11%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	40779 MPixel/s +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (33192 - 41668, n=13)	39182 MPixel/s +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	39002 MPixel/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	38837 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	38580 MPixel/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	35861 MPixel/s -7%

System performance

The results in the system benchmarks are good overall and the VIA 14 Pro was always a responsive companion in everyday use. Although the RAM cannot be upgraded, 32 GB is already installed as standard, which should be sufficient for the vast majority of users for years to come.

PCMark 10 / Score
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	7428 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (6993 - 7641, n=8)	7279 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	7216 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7157 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	7120 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	7045 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	7028 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=57, last 2 years)	6588 Points -7%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	11168 Points +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	10946 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (10286 - 11570, n=8)	10924 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	10894 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	10855 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10732 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	10685 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11406, n=57, last 2 years)	10495 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10449 Points +7%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	10279 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9742 - 10482, n=8)	10117 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	9969 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	9787 Points
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	8837 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	8804 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=57, last 2 years)	8698 Points -11%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	9823 Points +5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	9812 Points +5%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	9691 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (9009 - 10009, n=8)	9476 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	9423 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	9367 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8873 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=57, last 2 years)	8591 Points -8%

CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1852 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1840 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1810 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1633 - 1939, n=8)	1781 Points 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1779 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1698 Points -5%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1694 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=67, last 2 years)	1602 Points -10%

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1784 Points +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1770 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1745 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1716 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1562 - 1872, n=8)	1711 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1658 Points -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1598 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=67, last 2 years)	1533 Points -11%

CrossMark / Creativity
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1999 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1978 Points +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1942 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1734 - 2052, n=8)	1930 Points -1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1925 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1909 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1842 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=67, last 2 years)	1778 Points -8%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1721 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1703 Points +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1612 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (1437 - 1849, n=8)	1582 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1523 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1428 Points -6%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	1377 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=67, last 2 years)	1349 Points -11%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	440 Points +43%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	324 Points +5%
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 482, n=66, last 2 years)	316 Points +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	308 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (295 - 334, n=8)	306 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	295 Points -4%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	278 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	276 Points -10%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	319 Points +30%
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=67, last 2 years)	265 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (245 - 314, n=8)	263 Points +7%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	254 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	248 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	247 Points +1%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	247 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	245 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	544 ms * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M (501 - 664, n=8)	540 ms * -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	531 ms * -3%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	530 ms * -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	518 ms * -0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	516 ms *
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	508 ms * +2%
Average of class Subnotebook (265 - 1104, n=75, last 2 years)	504 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		7120 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	93396 MB/s +35%
Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=68, last 2 years)	77154 MB/s +12%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	76766 MB/s +11%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	76483 MB/s +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	69522 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	69160 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	67660 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (61459 - 71873, n=13)	67525 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	84853 MB/s +70%
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=68, last 2 years)	73444 MB/s +47%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	70384 MB/s +41%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (49866 - 61976, n=13)	58665 MB/s +18%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	58321 MB/s +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	50572 MB/s +1%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	49971 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	49866 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	107658 MB/s +15%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	93323 MB/s 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	93239 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	93229 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (68425 - 93239, n=13)	85823 MB/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=68, last 2 years)	80595 MB/s -14%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	67847 MB/s -27%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	58692 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	187.8 ns * -75%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core	139.4 ns * -30%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, Radeon 780M	114.5 ns * -7%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	107.1 ns *
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M	106 ns * +1%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=67, last 2 years)	104.1 ns * +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, Radeon 780M	101.8 ns * +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (82.5 - 117, n=13)	96.5 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

In our standardized latency test (surfing the Internet, 4K YouTube playback, CPU load), the test device with the current BIOS version shows no limitations. Although one driver fails slightly, the important interrupt-to-process latency value is very low.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	1219.5 μs * -156%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1102.5 μs * -131%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	1045.4 μs * -119%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	848.9 μs * -78%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	476.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

The VIA 14 Pro offers two fast PCIe 4.0 slots for M.2 2280 SSDs. A 500 GB SSD is installed in the basic configuration, but our test device contains the 2 TB version of the Samsung 990 Pro (surcharge 138 euros). The 990 Pro achieves high transfer rates and the performance remains completely stable even under prolonged load. After the initial start-up, the user has 1.76 TB at their disposal. Further SSD benchmarks can be found here.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7124 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6890 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 459 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 463 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 118.2 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 388 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1211 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	89.7 pt
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	87.6 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	71.2 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	70.9 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	69.6 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	53.6 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	45.1 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	44.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4269 (4234.28^min - 4269.44^max) MB/s +29%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4057 (4023.18^min - 4057.01^max) MB/s +22%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3322 (3294.63^min - 3322.45^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3300 (3279.05^min - 3299.87^max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (2985 - 3322, n=2)	3154 MB/s -5%
Average of class Subnotebook (688 - 4852, n=67, last 2 years)	2967 MB/s -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2498 (2465.72^min - 2497.5^max) MB/s -25%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2379 (2365.59^min - 2378.73^max) MB/s -28%
seq write
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4695 (4542.57^min - 4694.68^max) MB/s +13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4138 - 5099, n=2)	4619 MB/s +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4317 (4288.28^min - 4317.37^max) MB/s +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4138 (4046.54^min - 4137.79^max) MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3660 (3614.13^min - 3659.97^max) MB/s -12%
Average of class Subnotebook (102.8 - 5344, n=67, last 2 years)	2936 MB/s -29%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2604 (2525.41^min - 2604.03^max) MB/s -37%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2211 (2136.92^min - 2210.59^max) MB/s -47%
seq q8 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	6844 (6027.53^min - 6843.85^max) MB/s +19%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (5761 - 7102, n=2)	6432 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	5761 (5244.77^min - 5760.67^max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (694 - 13544, n=67, last 2 years)	5376 MB/s -7%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	5251 (4849.66^min - 5251.27^max) MB/s -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4911 (4608.27^min - 4910.87^max) MB/s -15%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4504 (3696.49^min - 4504.05^max) MB/s -22%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3857 (3120.3^min - 3857.29^max) MB/s -33%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	6810 (6778.41^min - 6809.87^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (6801 - 6810, n=2)	6806 MB/s 0%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4955 (4919.92^min - 4955.1^max) MB/s -27%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4676 (4556.48^min - 4675.9^max) MB/s -31%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4467 (4437.85^min - 4466.6^max) MB/s -34%
Average of class Subnotebook (107 - 9702, n=67, last 2 years)	4297 MB/s -37%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3105 (3076.1^min - 3105.46^max) MB/s -54%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2871 (2734.06^min - 2871.34^max) MB/s -58%
4k q1 t1 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	82.2 (81.81^min - 82.16^max) MB/s +22%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	77.8 (73.1^min - 77.81^max) MB/s +16%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (67.3 - 80.7, n=2)	74 MB/s +10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	67.3 (66.81^min - 67.29^max) MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	62.2 (61.77^min - 62.19^max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (19.9 - 95.2, n=67, last 2 years)	60.7 MB/s -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	58.8 (58.1^min - 58.81^max) MB/s -13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	34.6 (34.41^min - 34.64^max) MB/s -49%
4k q1 t1 write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (159.4 - 352, n=2)	256 MB/s +61%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	245 (242.81^min - 244.56^max) MB/s +54%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	221 (220.34^min - 221.44^max) MB/s +39%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	205 (203.95^min - 205.23^max) MB/s +29%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	159.4 (155.73^min - 159.37^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	157.7 (151.37^min - 157.68^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 360, n=67, last 2 years)	156.7 MB/s -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	112.5 (111.01^min - 112.51^max) MB/s -29%
4k q32 t16 read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4286 (4274.43^min - 4286.07^max) MB/s +313%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3460 (3433.29^min - 3460.15^max) MB/s +234%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (1037 - 5735, n=2)	3386 MB/s +227%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	3048 (2829.43^min - 3047.69^max) MB/s +194%
Average of class Subnotebook (207 - 4286, n=67, last 2 years)	1232 MB/s +19%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1037 (1017.69^min - 1037.34^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	909 (848.35^min - 908.51^max) MB/s -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	850 (824.69^min - 850.28^max) MB/s -18%
4k q32 t16 write
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4189 (4136.14^min - 4188.97^max) MB/s +769%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3266 (3227.93^min - 3265.61^max) MB/s +578%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	2980 (2752.98^min - 2980.38^max) MB/s +518%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (482 - 4869, n=2)	2676 MB/s +455%
Average of class Subnotebook (115.9 - 5007, n=67, last 2 years)	898 MB/s +86%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	482 (476.35^min - 481.55^max) MB/s
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	435 (416.7^min - 435.33^max) MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	375 (355.65^min - 375.1^max) MB/s -22%

AS SSD
Score Total
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	8892 Points +36%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (6556 - 10745, n=2)	8651 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	7325 Points +12%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	6556 Points
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4927 Points -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (515 - 9875, n=66, last 2 years)	4364 Points -33%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3819 Points -42%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3408 Points -48%
Score Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3307 Points +138%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2782 Points +100%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (1391 - 3980, n=2)	2686 Points +93%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1784 Points +28%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	1391 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (246 - 4048, n=66, last 2 years)	1387 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1217 Points -13%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1195 Points -14%
Score Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4469 - 4734, n=2)	4602 Points +3%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4469 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3972 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	3203 Points -28%
Average of class Subnotebook (153 - 4469, n=66, last 2 years)	2326 Points -48%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	2223 Points -50%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	2070 Points -54%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1632 Points -63%
Seq Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	5525 MB/s +27%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (4336 - 5066, n=2)	4701 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	4336 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	4310 MB/s -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (448 - 8075, n=66, last 2 years)	4237 MB/s -2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4109 MB/s -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3675 MB/s -15%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	3304 MB/s -24%
Seq Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (3714 - 5119, n=2)	4416 MB/s +19%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	4104 MB/s +11%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	4004 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3714 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2791 MB/s -25%
Average of class Subnotebook (99 - 5120, n=66, last 2 years)	2786 MB/s -25%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2172 MB/s -42%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1828 MB/s -51%
4K Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	72.3 MB/s +13%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (64.2 - 77.8, n=2)	71 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	64.2 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (19.8 - 96.2, n=66, last 2 years)	59.8 MB/s -7%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	58.5 MB/s -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	57.8 MB/s -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51 MB/s -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	49.9 MB/s -22%
4K Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (192.8 - 307, n=2)	250 MB/s +30%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	192.8 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	180.6 MB/s -6%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	177.1 MB/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (37.4 - 251, n=66, last 2 years)	175.9 MB/s -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	173.1 MB/s -10%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	167.9 MB/s -13%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	161 MB/s -16%
4K-64 Read
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	2682 MB/s +200%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2301 MB/s +158%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (893 - 3395, n=2)	2144 MB/s +140%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1315 MB/s +47%
Average of class Subnotebook (181.8 - 3417, n=66, last 2 years)	904 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	893 MB/s
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	806 MB/s -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	798 MB/s -11%
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (3905 - 3915, n=2)	3910 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	3905 MB/s
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	3410 MB/s -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	2743 MB/s -30%
Average of class Subnotebook (105.9 - 3905, n=66, last 2 years)	1868 MB/s -52%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	1719 MB/s -56%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	1639 MB/s -58%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1238 MB/s -68%
Access Time Read
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	0.058 ms * -190%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.02 - 0.167, n=66, last 2 years)	0.05564 ms * -178%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (0.02 - 0.052, n=2)	0.036 ms * -80%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.027 ms * -35%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	0.024 ms * -20%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.023 ms * -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	0.022 ms * -10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	0.02 ms *
Access Time Write
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 YMTC PC300-1TB	0.11 ms * -450%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	0.108 ms * -440%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.1 ms * -400%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.017 - 0.352, n=66, last 2 years)	0.06688 ms * -234%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0	0.025 ms * -25%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	0.022 ms * -10%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	0.02 ms *
Average Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB (0.013 - 0.02, n=2)	0.0165 ms * +17%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5739 (4853.38-5771.79)

Graphics card

The Ryzen 8000 series still relies on the familiar Radeon 780M, which benefits from the dual-channel configuration of the RAM. The iGPU is very suitable for everyday use and gaming is also possible, although you often have to be satisfied with low details in current titles. In the synthetic benchmarks, the new Intel Arc Graphics iGPU (with 8 Xe cores) can slightly outperform the 780M, but gaming performance is on par.

The graphics performance remains completely stable even under prolonged load, and our Cyberpunk 2077 test (30 minutes) also shows no loss of performance. In battery mode, however, the GPU performance is minimally reduced (~11%). Further GPU benchmarks are available in our technology section.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 6.4

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	95.3 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	93 pt
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	90 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	87.7 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	85.9 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	84.5 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M	82.2 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	74.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13734 Points
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13524 Points -2%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	13321 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	13316 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	12999 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (7868 - 14274, n=64)	12470 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	12375 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook (995 - 16296, n=66, last 2 years)	9654 Points -30%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	9548 Points +14%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	8538 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	8513 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	8441 Points +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8438 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	8345 Points
Average AMD Radeon 780M (4550 - 8904, n=66)	7752 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=69, last 2 years)	7227 Points -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3671 Points +26%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	3411 Points +17%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	3027 Points +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2915 Points
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	2876 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	2847 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (804 - 4501, n=68, last 2 years)	2783 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (1496 - 3196, n=66)	2716 Points -7%

Geekbench 6.4 - GPU OpenCL
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	34669 Points +12%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	31025 Points +1%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	30818 Points
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	27410 Points -11%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	29233 Points -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (15316 - 33077, n=61)	28704 Points -7%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	28473 Points -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (9516 - 52427, n=69, last 2 years)	26855 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	26058 Points -15%

3DMark 11 Performance		13077 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		7731 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		3234 points
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score		2788 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom CPU | v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=71, last 2 years)	544 Seconds * -73%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	385 Seconds * -23%
Average AMD Radeon 780M (300 - 664, n=62)	372 Seconds * -18%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS	369 Seconds * -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	352 Seconds * -12%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	341 Seconds * -9%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	336 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS	314 Seconds *

Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel
Average of class Subnotebook (210 - 368, n=7, last 2 years)	258 Seconds *
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H	223 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	93.6 pt
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	92.5 pt
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	88.3 pt
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	87.6 pt
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	87.2 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	78.4 pt
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T ^-1! Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	72.4 pt

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.2 (3.56^min, 19.2^P1) fps +4%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.1 (3.98^min, 18.9^P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	26.1 (3.05^min, 18.2^P1) fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	25.7 (2.69^min, 16.4^P1) fps -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=65, last 2 years)	20.7 fps -21%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	20.6 (2.88^min, 15.9^P1) fps -21%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31.6 fps +10%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	29.4 fps +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.8 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	28.4 fps -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	27.6 fps -4%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	26.5 fps -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=71, last 2 years)	24.6 fps -15%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	58 fps +18%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49.6 (35.6^min, 39^P1) fps +1%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 fps 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	49 fps
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	48.9 (6.3^min, 16.2^P1) fps 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	48.1 (10.9^min, 15.3^P1) fps -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=68, last 2 years)	42.8 fps -13%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	85.1 (75.2^min) fps +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	76.8 (67.2^min) fps +2%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	75.1 (65.6^min) fps
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	75 (63.4^min) fps 0%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	74 (46.7^min) fps -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=73, last 2 years)	64.8 fps -14%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	35.2 (33.9^min) fps -53%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	39.5 fps +28%
Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	35.4 fps +15%
Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=62, last 2 years)	34.8 fps +13%
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	32.3 fps +5%
Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	31.7 fps +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	31 fps 0%
SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	30.9 fps

Cyberpunk 2077 FPS chart

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M: Ø21.6 (19.5-22)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	147.5	133.8	64.1	26.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	122.9	102.7	84.1	75.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	75.6	38.2	28.8		20.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	53	38.1	30.9
Strange Brigade (2018)	155	66	57	49
F1 23 (2023)	85.9	76.7	53	11.6
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)	40.1	31.5	25.8	25.4
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023)	41.5	32.2	25.8	22.4
F1 24 (2024)	85.9	71.9	51.4	11.1

Emissions & Energy

Noise emissions

The cooling of the VIA 14 Pro uses two fans and the volume depends largely on the selected energy profile. In idle mode and simple tasks, the device remains mostly silent even in performance mode. Under higher load, however, the two fans are clearly noticeable and a maximum of 43.6 dB(A) is not particularly quiet. The results in the other energy profiles are listed in the following table. The fans remain deactivated for a very long time, especially in the Quiet profile. There were no other electronic noises in our test device.

Energy profile	3DMark 06	Cyberpunk 2077	Stress test
Quiet	Fan off	28.8 dB(A)	30.6 dB(A)
Balanced	36.2 dB(A)	36.2 dB(A)	36.2 dB(A)
Power	36.2 dB(A)	43.6 dB(A)	43.6 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle		25.7 / 25.7 / 25.7 dB(A)
Load		36.2 / 43.6 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.7 dB(A)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
Noise		1%	3%	2%	1%	9%
off / environment *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Minimum *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Average *	25.7	25.11 2%	23.8 7%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	23.5 9%
Idle Maximum *	25.7	27.2 -6%	27.1 -5%	25.1 2%	23.9 7%	25.1 2%
Load Average *	36.2	31.3 14%	34.9 4%	35.9 1%	44.3 -22%	32.4 10%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	43.6		43.7 -0%
Load Maximum *	43.6	46.61 -7%	43.7 -0%	42.2 3%	44.3 -2%	37.3 14%
Witcher 3 ultra *				39.3	41.3	34.9

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

The casing of the VIA 14 Pro barely heats up in idle mode and during light tasks, but this changes under load. On the underside, we measured almost 50 °C in the middle area both during gaming and in the stress test, which is why you should not place the device on your thighs in such a scenario. The keyboard area also gets noticeably warm at up to 43 °C, but there are no limitations here. In the stress test, the processor operates at a constant 54 watts.

On the negative side, we noticed the 100-watt power supply, which differs slightly from the Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 power supply. Although the laptop's total consumption during the stress test is around 92 watts and therefore not yet at the power supply's limit, temperatures of just under 60 °C are definitely too high.

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


44.1 °C 111 F	44.6 °C 112 F	43.2 °C 110 F
41.7 °C 107 F	43.6 °C 110 F	40.1 °C 104 F
31.9 °C 89 F	33 °C 91 F	32.8 °C 91 F

Maximum: 44.6 °C = 112 F
Average: 39.4 °C = 103 F


44.6 °C 112 F	50.9 °C 124 F	42.2 °C 108 F
39.3 °C 103 F	50 °C 122 F	34.4 °C 94 F
34.3 °C 94 F	35.5 °C 96 F	32.6 °C 91 F

Maximum: 50.9 °C = 124 F
Average: 40.4 °C = 105 F

Power Supply (max.) 59.5 °C = 139 F | Room Temperature 22.4 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


26.3 °C 79 F	26.5 °C 80 F	26.3 °C 79 F
25.7 °C 78 F	26.2 °C 79 F	26 °C 79 F
25.2 °C 77 F	25.5 °C 78 F	25.3 °C 78 F

Maximum: 26.5 °C = 80 F
Average: 25.9 °C = 79 F


26.1 °C 79 F	26.3 °C 79 F	25.8 °C 78 F
25.7 °C 78 F	26.3 °C 79 F	25.3 °C 78 F
25.6 °C 78 F	25.6 °C 78 F	25.5 °C 78 F

Maximum: 26.3 °C = 79 F
Average: 25.8 °C = 78 F

Power Supply (max.) 28.7 °C = 84 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Cyberpunk


42.3 °C 108 F	42.9 °C 109 F	41.4 °C 107 F
38.1 °C 101 F	42.8 °C 109 F	38.2 °C 101 F
32.3 °C 90 F	33.8 °C 93 F	30.7 °C 87 F

Maximum: 42.9 °C = 109 F
Average: 38.1 °C = 101 F


43.1 °C 110 F	49.5 °C 121 F	38.6 °C 101 F
37.2 °C 99 F	48.3 °C 119 F	33.2 °C 92 F
32.4 °C 90 F	33.5 °C 92 F	31.5 °C 89 F

Maximum: 49.5 °C = 121 F
Average: 38.6 °C = 101 F

Power Supply (max.) 57.8 °C = 136 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.9 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-5.6 °C / -10 F).

Surface temperatures stress test (top side)

Surface temperatures stress test (underside)

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
Heat		-6%	-2%	2%	11%	7%
Maximum Upper Side *	44.6	45.2 -1%	43.7 2%	43.1 3%	39.6 11%	41.5 7%
Maximum Bottom *	50.9	49.2 3%	49.4 3%	50.2 1%	38.6 24%	45.7 10%
Idle Upper Side *	26.5	29.6 -12%	27.7 -5%	25.8 3%	24.8 6%	24.7 7%
Idle Bottom *	26.3	30.2 -15%	28.6 -9%	26.4 -0%	25.3 4%	24.9 5%

* ... smaller is better

Speaker

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power consumption

The higher panel brightness is not negatively noticeable compared to the Tuxedo Pulse 14 and the maximum consumption of 94 watts is also slightly lower. All in all, there are no surprises here and the supplied 100 watt power supply is sufficiently dimensioned. However, the consumption when switched off has still not improved and 0.8 watts is a little high.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.8 / 0.86 Watt
Idle	4.8 / 8.7 / 9.2 Watt
Load	63.2 / 94.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA Radeon 780M, R7 8840HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
Power Consumption		11%	2%	27%	5%	-8%
Idle Minimum *	4.8	4.4 8%	4.4 8%	3.6 25%	5.3 -10%	5.6 -17%
Idle Average *	8.7	5.6 36%	9.2 -6%	6.6 24%	7.2 17%	9.2 -6%
Idle Maximum *	9.2	12.5 -36%	9.6 -4%	7.4 20%	7.5 18%	9.7 -5%
Load Average *	63.2	52.1 18%	62.6 1%	47.1 25%	65.6 -4%	65.2 -3%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra *	81.3		71.5 12%
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor *	80.2		71.9 10%
Load Maximum *	94.5	67.3 29%	101.7 -8%	54.3 43%	89.6 5%	101 -7%
Witcher 3 ultra *		46.7		47.4	73	70

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø91.9 (88.9-94.5)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.24 (6.23-10.7)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø81.3 (78.4-83.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø81.1 (78.4-83.8)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.7 (80-81.3)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø31.3 (28.2-39)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø80.6 (78.6-82.8)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø68.1 (56.6-72.3)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.14 (6.7-11.7)

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24); Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø80.2 (78.5-83.1)

Battery life

The battery runtimes in conjunction with the 60 Wh battery are not bad in themselves, but the VIA 14 Pro is beaten by the competition. The frequency only has a minimal influence on the battery runtimes, which can also be seen in the following table. The brightness of 150 cd/m² for the WLAN and video test corresponds to 32% of the maximum brightness on the test device.

Frequency	WLAN test 150 cd/m²	WLAN test maximum brightness
60 Hz	9:31 hours	6:16 hours
120 Hz	9:28 hours	6:06 hours

A full charge with the device switched on takes 141 minutes. 80% of the capacity is available again after around 55 minutes.

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		9h 31min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		6h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 12min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 04min

	SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh	Huawei MateBook 14 FLMH-W7611T Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 70 Wh	Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 80 Wh	Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M, 75 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh	Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		118%	73%	66%	55%	6%	60%
H.264	612		1251 104%	1046 71%	1031 68%	595 -3%	967 ?(527 - 1425, n=32, last 2 years) 58%
WiFi v1.3	571	758 33%	888 56%	774 36%	710 24%	620 9%	760 ?(389 - 1585, n=71, last 2 years) 33%
Load	64	194 203%	101 58%	123 92%	110 72%	72 13%	121.3 ?(52 - 228, n=48, last 2 years) 90%

Pros

+ very high system performance

+ good 120 Hz IPS display without PWM

+ 32 GB RAM as standard

+ 2x PCIe-4.0-x4 for up to 8 TB storage

+ comfortable keyboard

+ good variety of connections

Cons

- no USB 4.0

- slow microSD card reader

- Case sensitive to fingerprints

- poor 720p webcam

- RAM soldered

- high power supply temperatures

Verdict - Schenker VIA 14 Pro now with a brighter display

In review: Schenker Via 14 Pro (M24). Test device provided by: Schenker Germany

With the VIA 14 Pro, Schenker has a fast and compact 14-inch device on offer, which, in addition to the powerful Ryzen processor and the standard RAM configuration of 32 GB, is characterized above all by the good expansion options (2x M.2-2280). There is also a sufficient number of ports available, even if you have to do without modern standards such as USB 4.0. However, the microSD card reader is very slow and the weak 720p webcam is no longer up to date. Despite the new surface, fingerprints are still a problem.

The new Ryzen processor offers plenty of performance and the fast Radeon 780M GPU, but there is no advantage over the old Ryzen 7 7840HS in the predecessor model. The big upgrade for the 2024 model year is the IPS screen, which is now significantly brighter. The manufacturer's specification increases from 300 to 400 cd/m², with our test device even reaching an average of just under 470 cd/m². After calibration, the picture quality is also very good.

The Schenker VIA Pro 14 is a fast 14-inch notebook and now offers a brighter IPS screen, which is very suitable for productive activities. The price-performance ratio is decent, but there are some areas where you have to make sacrifices (no USB 4.0, weak webcam, slow card reader).

Compared to the competition, the VIA 14 Pro scores particularly well with its 32 GB RAM and two SSD slots, which is a rarity for 14-inch models. However, some of the competition offers OLED panels and also has advantages in terms of battery life. Tuxedo now also offers the identical Pulse 14 Gen4 with Linux from €1,230.

Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. Further information can be found here.

SCHENKER VIA 14 Pro (M24) - 07/12/2024 v8
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

85 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

88%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

60 / 74 → 81%

Weight

70 / 20-77 → 88%

Battery

87%

Display

85%

Games Performance

53 / 75 → 70%

Application Performance

86 / 92 → 93%

Temperature

81%

Noise

85%

Audio

70 / 91 → 77%

Camera

23 / 75 → 31%

Average

62%

85%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
0%

Power Use
76.9%

Repairability
90%

Software Updates
22.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 39.9%

Schenker Key 14 review - 100 W RTX 4060 in a compact multimedia laptop 12/20/2024

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Read all 2 comments / answer

Loading Comments

Comment on this article

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1791 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

I grew up with modern consumer electronics and my first computer was a Commodore C64, which encouraged my interest in building my own systems. I started working as a review editor for Notebookcheck during my dual studies at Siemens. Currently, I am mainly responsible for dealing with business laptops and mobile workstations. It’s a great experience to be able to review the latest devices and technologies and then compare them with each other.

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 538344 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

My main responsibility as an editorial assistant is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from other publications and channels. In addition, my daily breakfast is Notebookcheck's long list of new content, which I comb through to select the most interesting topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch."

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!