Notebookcheck Logo

Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G

Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G

The 1000G Kingston FURY Renegade PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD is a fast high end solid disk drive with the part number SFYRS1000G. It is specified with a maximum read write of 7,300 MB/s and write of 6,000 MB/s. It is available with a heatsink or a low-profile heat spreader and rated as "PS5 ready".

TypeNVMe
SizeM.2-2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
ControllerPhison PS5018-E18, 8 Kanäle
Announced18.10.2022
LinkKingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
45.5 pt (52%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.719 -98%
...
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
43 -5%
Phison PS5021-E21 512GB
43.1 -5%
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014
43.8 -4%
SSSTC CA6-8D2048
43.9 -4%
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
43.9 -4%
Crucial P3 Plus CT2000P3PSSD8
44.1 -3%
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB
44.5 -2%
SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X186N
44.8 -2%
Acer N7000 2 TB
45.1 -1%
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
45.5
Lexar SSD NM7A1 2TB
45.7 0%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
45.8 1%
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1032
45.9 1%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
46 1%
SSSTC CA6-8D512
46.1 1%
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
46.2 2%
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
46.4 2%
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
46.8 3%
321JN1024GB-TX01
47 3%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5
88.1 94%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 2408.21     avg: 2488     median: 2487.5 (42%)     max: 2566.79 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 1083.35     avg: 1120     median: 1119.6 (42%)     max: 1155.93 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 588.84     avg: 2648     median: 2647.9 (24%)     max: 4706.94 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 8146     avg: 8205     median: 8204.5 (50%)     max: 8263 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 5482     avg: 5574     median: 5573.5 (77%)     max: 5665 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1792     avg: 1831     median: 1830.5 (29%)     max: 1869 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.013     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.017 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.024     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.104 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 4653     avg: 4869     median: 4869.1 (82%)     max: 5085.1 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 854     avg: 1001     median: 1001.1 (20%)     max: 1148.16 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 225     avg: 248.6     median: 248.6 (48%)     max: 272.11 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 66.4     avg: 72.1     median: 72.1 (23%)     max: 77.71 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 3081     avg: 4560     median: 4560 (40%)     max: 6039 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 5664     avg: 7574     median: 7574 (59%)     max: 9484 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Write
506 MB/s (47%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Read
622 MB/s (48%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Write
191.2 MB/s (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Read
85.2 MB/s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Write
3305 MB/s (37%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Read
2798 MB/s (59%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Write
4251 MB/s (41%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Read
4130 MB/s (51%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 118.6     avg: 148.1     median: 148.1 (13%)     max: 177.5 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 63.5     avg: 69.3     median: 69.3 (2%)     max: 75.1 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
4029 MB/s (22%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
3844 MB/s (46%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 403     avg: 494.2     median: 494.2 (10%)     max: 585.3 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 324     avg: 507     median: 506.7 (7%)     max: 689.3 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 6107     avg: 6344     median: 6343.5 (42%)     max: 6580 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 7079.6     avg: 8291     median: 8290.8 (44%)     max: 9502 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
min: 294     avg: 420.6     median: 420.6 (8%)     max: 547.2 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
min: 862     avg: 1030     median: 1029.8 (15%)     max: 1197.5 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 170.3     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (42%)     max: 192 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 69.8     avg: 78.2     median: 78.2 (23%)     max: 86.5 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 538     avg: 578     median: 578 (9%)     max: 618 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 1112     avg: 1144     median: 1144 (14%)     max: 1176 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 4256     avg: 4924     median: 4924 (49%)     max: 5592 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 3912     avg: 5471     median: 5470.5 (71%)     max: 7029 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 6135     avg: 8468     median: 8467.5 (58%)     max: 10800 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 7116     avg: 10715     median: 10714.5 (67%)     max: 14313 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 6568     avg: 10421     median: 10421 (64%)     max: 14274 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400250026002700280029003000310032003300340035003600370038003900400041004200430044004500460047004800490050005100520053005400550056005700580059006000610062006300640065006600670068006900700071007200730074007500760077007800790080008100820083008400850086008700880089009000910092009300940095009600970098009900Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 28. 04:23:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 24 Sep 2025 22:34:20 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3911 +0.017s ... 0.024s

#7 got single benchmarks 3911 +0.008s ... 0.032s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.199s ... 1.231s

#10 return log +0.001s ... 1.232s

Notebook reviews with Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and RTX 5090 Laptop for maximum gaming performance - XMG Neo 16 A25 review

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D and RTX 5090 Laptop for maximum gaming performance - XMG Neo 16 A25 review

XMG is also offering its high-end gaming laptop with AMD processors this year. We are testing the Neo 16 A25, equipped with the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D processor, GeFo...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | 16.00" | 2.9 kg
Intel NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon

Intel NUC 13 Extreme Raptor Canyon mini PC with Core i9-13900K and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in review

Intel's NUC Extreme series has been updated to the latest 13th gen. Raptor Lake processors. Compared to its predecessor, a lot has changed in terms of the exter...
Intel Core i9-13900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 A25 5090: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2.9 kg
   » Intel is beaten - AMD's Ryzen 9 9955HX3D with 3D V-Cache is the best choice for gaming

Intel NUC13 Raptor Canyon: Intel Core i9-13900K NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
   » Intel NUC 13 Extreme barebones PC with Core i5-13600K and room for dedicated GPU discounted below $500

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2022-12-16)