Notebookcheck Logo

Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8

CT1000P3PSSD8

The Crucial P3 Plus NVMe SSD 1TB is a mid range GEN4 PCIe SSD. It uses a Phison controller and Micron flash. It is rated at up to 5.000 MB/s sequential read and 3.600 MB/s sequential write.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced06.07.2023

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
37.3 pt (43%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.709 -98%
...
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
35 -6%
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
35.1 -6%
SK Hynix HFS002TEJ9X162N
35.7 -4%
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
36 -3%
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
36.2 -3%
SK Hynix Gold P31 1TB SHGP31-1000GM-2
36.2 -3%
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G
37.2 0%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
37.2 0%
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
37.3 0%
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
37.3
Micron 2400 MTFDKCD1T0QFM
37.4 0%
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
37.5 1%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
37.9 2%
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
38 2%
Kioxia KXG70ZNV512G
38.1 2%
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
38.1 2%
Lenovo UMIS RPETJ1T24MHP2QDQ
38.2 2%
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
38.5 3%
Micron 2550 MTFDKBA512TGE
39.1 5%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5
87.4 134%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 286.9     avg: 1639     median: 1653.7 (28%)     max: 2239.59 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 261.4     avg: 679     median: 717.4 (27%)     max: 898.61 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 1094.72     avg: 2311     median: 2236.1 (20%)     max: 3581.4 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 2617     avg: 5253     median: 4784 (29%)     max: 10021 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 800     avg: 2473     median: 2549 (35%)     max: 4371 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1108     avg: 1862     median: 1606 (26%)     max: 3741 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.017     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.095 ms
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.047     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.094 ms
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 331.93     avg: 1972     median: 1986.4 (34%)     max: 3731 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 664.76     avg: 1414     median: 1211.1 (24%)     max: 3220 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 77.9     avg: 195.9     median: 215 (42%)     max: 286.17 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 37.69     avg: 57.8     median: 51.2 (16%)     max: 89.3 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 1679.72     avg: 3052     median: 3093.8 (27%)     max: 4255.31 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 3157.87     avg: 3894     median: 3885.4 (30%)     max: 4330.36 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Write
min: 327.9     avg: 331.7     median: 331.7 (31%)     max: 335.5 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Read
min: 574.4     avg: 603     median: 603 (47%)     max: 631.6 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Write
min: 131.2     avg: 154.7     median: 154.7 (5%)     max: 178.1 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Read
min: 44.51     avg: 52.8     median: 52.8 (1%)     max: 61.03 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Write
min: 1487     avg: 2879     median: 2878.5 (32%)     max: 4270 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Read
min: 2055     avg: 2066     median: 2065.5 (43%)     max: 2076 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Write
min: 3655     avg: 4071     median: 4071 (39%)     max: 4487 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Read
min: 2810     avg: 2897     median: 2897 (36%)     max: 2984 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 120.1     avg: 235.3     median: 255.3 (23%)     max: 311.5 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 46.9     avg: 63.3     median: 63.1 (2%)     max: 85.15 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 1793     avg: 3202     median: 3253 (18%)     max: 4637 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 2123     avg: 2733     median: 2776.5 (33%)     max: 3176 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 335.4     avg: 397     median: 386.9 (13%)     max: 516.2 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 497.8     avg: 671     median: 691.9 (11%)     max: 749.9 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 1899     avg: 3324     median: 3576 (24%)     max: 4762.1 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 3667     avg: 5003     median: 5173 (28%)     max: 5659 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
min: 1803     avg: 2011     median: 2011 (40%)     max: 2219 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
min: 1516.1     avg: 1943     median: 1943 (29%)     max: 2369.8 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 91     avg: 233.6     median: 260.5 (60%)     max: 343 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 6.85     avg: 56.5     median: 53.8 (16%)     max: 82.5 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 1066     avg: 2480     median: 2117 (34%)     max: 4288 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 696     avg: 2508     median: 2795.5 (34%)     max: 3197 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 1873     avg: 3424     median: 3497.5 (35%)     max: 4619 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2127     avg: 2695     median: 2729 (36%)     max: 3108 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 739     avg: 3147     median: 3395 (23%)     max: 4754 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 3673     avg: 4885     median: 5109 (32%)     max: 5213 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 3663     avg: 4829     median: 5039.5 (31%)     max: 5188 MB/s
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900200021002200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400350036003700380039004000410042004300440045004600470048004900500051005200Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 31. 04:09:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 26 Jul 2025 20:41:40 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.01s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4020 +0.028s ... 0.039s

#7 got single benchmarks 4020 +0.035s ... 0.073s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.547s ... 1.62s

#10 return log +0.003s ... 1.623s

Notebook reviews with Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8

GMK NucBox K11 mini PC review: Strong performance-per-dollar with AMD Zen 4

GMK NucBox K11 mini PC review: Strong performance-per-dollar with AMD Zen 4

Older Zen 4 CPUs are becoming quite the bargain especially when compared to Intel alternatives. The NucBox K11 is one of the least expensive AMD mini PCs with O...
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS | AMD Radeon 780M | 630 g
GMKtec EVO-X1 mini PC review: New boxy design with Oculink and Ryzen AI 9

GMKtec EVO-X1 mini PC review: New boxy design with Oculink and Ryzen AI 9

GMK is debuting an interesting chassis design with both AMD Zen 5 and Oculink support. It's an attractive look fit for professional settings, but the RGB LEDs c...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 595 g
Minisforum EliteMini AI370 review: The mini PC sets new standards with an AMD Zen 5 Strix Point APU

Minisforum EliteMini AI370 review: The mini PC sets new standards with an AMD Zen 5 Strix Point APU

The Minisforum EliteMini AI370 brings high-end performance inside a compact case and is aimed at users requiring high computing power in a small space. However,...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 472 g
Beelink SER9 review: AMD Zen 5 makes this mini PC faster than ever

Beelink SER9 review: AMD Zen 5 makes this mini PC faster than ever

Beelink is upping the ante in the mini PC space by incorporating AMD's latest Ryzen 9 CPU before most other competitors. The price has also risen accordingly, h...
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | AMD Radeon 890M | 814 g
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station mini PC review: More affordable than expected

Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station mini PC review: More affordable than expected

Mini PC eGPU docking stations were both uncommon and pricey just a few years ago, but the Beelink EX dock is one of the least expensive options thus far without...
Intel Core i9-12900H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | 1.3 kg

Beelink SER8: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SER8 PC review: Mac Mini-inspired design with an AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

Aoostar GEM12: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.7 kg
  Review » Aoostar GEM12 Mini-PC review: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS with 32 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD and OCuLink interface

Beelink SER5: AMD Ryzen 5 5560U AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), 0.4 kg
  Review » Ryzen 5 5560U performance debut: Beelink SER5 mini PC review

Beelink SER7: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.6 kg
  Review » Beelink SER7 mini PC review: Ryzen 7 7840HS with vapor chamber cooling

Beelink GTR7 7840HS: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.9 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS performance debut: Beelink GTR7 mini PC review

GMK NucBox K11: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.6 kg
   » Sleek GMKtec K11 mini PC with AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS and 32GB DDR5 gets big price cut

Beelink SER8: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.8 kg
   » Beelink Mini PC SER8 with AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS and Radeon 780M iGPU gets sizeable Amazon discount

Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station: Intel Core i9-12900H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 1.3 kg
   » Beelink makes EX mini PC eGPU dock free for anyone to build with open-source documentation

   » Beelink makes EX mini PC eGPU dock free for anyone to build with open-source documentation

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-07- 6)