Notebookcheck Logo

Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8

CT1000P3PSSD8

The Crucial P3 Plus NVMe SSD 1TB is a mid range GEN4 PCIe SSD. It uses a Phison controller and Micron flash. It is rated at up to 5.000 MB/s sequential read and 3.600 MB/s sequential write.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced06.07.2023

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
36.5 pt (41%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.719 -98%
...
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
34.6 -5%
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
34.7 -5%
WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-1T00
34.9 -4%
Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0
35.1 -4%
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
35.3 -3%
SK Hynix HFS002TEJ9X162N
36.1 -1%
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
36.2 -1%
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
36.3 -1%
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
36.4 0%
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
36.5
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
37.2 2%
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
37.6 3%
Micron 2400 MTFDKCD1T0QFM
37.7 3%
TeamGroup T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T
37.7 3%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
38.2 5%
Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
38.3 5%
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
38.4 5%
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
38.4 5%
Kioxia KXG70ZNV512G
38.5 5%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5
88.1 141%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 286.9     avg: 1550     median: 1638.9 (27%)     max: 2337.45 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 261.4     avg: 716     median: 747.2 (28%)     max: 1035.9 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 1094.72     avg: 2387     median: 2339.9 (9%)     max: 3581.4 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 2617     avg: 5588     median: 4784 (29%)     max: 10559 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 800     avg: 2672     median: 2549 (35%)     max: 4770 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1095     avg: 1954     median: 1606 (26%)     max: 3834 Points
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.017     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.097 ms
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.047     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.125 ms
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 331.93     avg: 2167     median: 1986.4 (34%)     max: 4103 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 653.44     avg: 1499     median: 1211.1 (24%)     max: 3321 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 77.9     avg: 203.4     median: 212.3 (41%)     max: 286.17 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 37.69     avg: 61.7     median: 55.9 (18%)     max: 89.3 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 1648.2     avg: 3018     median: 3093.8 (27%)     max: 4255.31 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 3157.87     avg: 3932     median: 3885.8 (30%)     max: 4330.36 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Write
min: 327.9     avg: 462.3     median: 335.5 (31%)     max: 723.6 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Read
min: 574.4     avg: 677     median: 631.6 (49%)     max: 824.8 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Write
min: 131.2     avg: 185.5     median: 178.1 (6%)     max: 247.1 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Read
min: 44.51     avg: 60     median: 61 (1%)     max: 74.37 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Write
min: 1487     avg: 2853     median: 2803 (31%)     max: 4270 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Read
min: 2055     avg: 2125     median: 2076 (44%)     max: 2245 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Write
min: 3655     avg: 4223     median: 4487 (43%)     max: 4528 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Read
min: 2810     avg: 3021     median: 2984 (37%)     max: 3268 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 120.1     avg: 243     median: 262.6 (24%)     max: 311.5 MB/s
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 46.9     avg: 65.1     median: 64.4 (2%)     max: 85.15 MB/s
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 1793     avg: 3208     median: 3253 (18%)     max: 4637 MB/s
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 2098     avg: 2715     median: 2744.5 (33%)     max: 3176 MB/s
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 335.4     avg: 424.4     median: 396.1 (8%)     max: 749.7 MB/s
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 497.8     avg: 666     median: 671.9 (10%)     max: 827.4 MB/s
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 1808     avg: 3237     median: 3569.5 (24%)     max: 4762.1 MB/s
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 3667     avg: 5007     median: 5112.5 (27%)     max: 5659 MB/s
+ 14 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
min: 1803     avg: 2290     median: 2219 (45%)     max: 2848.3 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
min: 1516.1     avg: 1912     median: 1851.1 (28%)     max: 2369.8 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 91     avg: 242.8     median: 258 (59%)     max: 343 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 6.85     avg: 57.6     median: 53.8 (16%)     max: 82.5 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 1066     avg: 2370     median: 1991 (32%)     max: 4288 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 696     avg: 2187     median: 2773 (34%)     max: 3560 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 1808     avg: 3278     median: 3283.5 (32%)     max: 4619 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2076     avg: 2576     median: 2649.5 (35%)     max: 3108 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 739     avg: 3066     median: 3033 (21%)     max: 4754 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 3673     avg: 4929     median: 5063.5 (31%)     max: 5213 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 3663     avg: 4800     median: 4857 (30%)     max: 5188 MB/s
+ 16 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900200021002200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400350036003700380039004000410042004300440045004600470048004900500051005200Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 13. 00:24:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:15:53 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4020 +0.023s ... 0.029s

#7 got single benchmarks 4020 +0.085s ... 0.114s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.114s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +1.453s ... 1.566s

#10 return log +0.002s ... 1.569s

Notebook reviews with Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8

GMK NucBox K12 mini PC review: Bigger, but not necessarily faster

GMK NucBox K12 mini PC review: Bigger, but not necessarily faster

While better than the NucBox K11 that came before it, the larger NucBox K12 doesn't offer much over its predecessor beyond just a few extra ports. Thankfully, p...
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 | AMD Radeon 780M | 938 g
Peladn HA-4

Powerful mini PC for the money? Peladn HA-4 challenges Geekom, Minisforum and co. - the efficiency miracle with Ryzen 7 7840HS review

The Peladn HA-4 is a powerful yet compact mini PC with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS processor, 8 Zen4 cores and integrated Radeon 780M graphics. Thanks to fast DDR5 R...
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS | AMD Radeon 780M | 965 g
GMKtec EVO-X2

One of the best mini PCs of 2025 - AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Radeon 8060S reviewed with top performance in the GMKtec EVO-X2

The GMKtec EVO-X2 combines high-end performance in the smallest of spaces: equipped with the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, a whopping 64 GB of RAM and the Radeon RX 80...
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | AMD Radeon 8060S | 1.6 kg
Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 mini PC review: The regular non-Pro version is faster

Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 mini PC review: The regular non-Pro version is faster

The SER9 and SER9 Pro are some of Beelink's best mini PCs in terms of price and performance. However, don't be fooled by the "Pro" naming as the regular SER9 is...
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 | AMD Radeon 780M | 812 g
GMKtec EVO-T1

High-end mini PC – GMKtec EVO-T1 review with Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 80W TDP, 64 GB RAM, and eGPU option

GMKtec presents the EVO-T1, a visually elegant yet powerful mini PC based on the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H. The manufacturer promises high performance and versati...
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | Intel Arc Graphics 140T | 946 g

Beelink SEi13 Pro: Intel Core i9-13900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SEi13 Pro review: Compact Mac Mini design with strong Intel CPU but limited graphics

GMK NucBox K11: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.6 kg
  Review » GMK NucBox K11 mini PC review: Strong performance-per-dollar with AMD Zen 4

GMK EVO-X1: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, 0.6 kg
  Review » GMKtec EVO-X1 mini PC review: New boxy design with Oculink and Ryzen AI 9

Minisforum EliteMini AI370: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, 0.5 kg
  Review » Minisforum EliteMini AI370 review: The mini PC sets new standards with an AMD Zen 5 Strix Point APU

Beelink SER9: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Radeon 890M, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SER9 review: AMD Zen 5 makes this mini PC faster than ever

Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station: Intel Core i9-12900H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 1.3 kg
  Review » Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station mini PC review: More affordable than expected

Beelink SER8: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.8 kg
  Review » Beelink SER8 PC review: Mac Mini-inspired design with an AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

Aoostar GEM12: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.7 kg
  Review » Aoostar GEM12 Mini-PC review: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS with 32 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD and OCuLink interface

Beelink SER5: AMD Ryzen 5 5560U AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), 0.4 kg
  Review » Ryzen 5 5560U performance debut: Beelink SER5 mini PC review

Beelink SER7: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.6 kg
  Review » Beelink SER7 mini PC review: Ryzen 7 7840HS with vapor chamber cooling

Beelink GTR7 7840HS: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.9 kg
  Review » AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS performance debut: Beelink GTR7 mini PC review

GMK NucBox K12: AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 AMD Radeon 780M, 0.9 kg
   » GMK NucBox K12 design has a small but annoying flaw

   » New Ryzen 7 H 255 performs almost identically to the 3-year old Ryzen 7 7840HS

Peladn HA-4, R7 7840HS: AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS AMD Radeon 780M, 1 kg
   » Stylish Ryzen 7 mini PC reviewed - Peladn HA-4 scores with top efficiency and RGB lighting

Beelink SER9 Pro: AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 AMD Radeon 780M, 0.8 kg
   » Ryzen 7 H 255 is a rebadged Ryzen 7 8845HS in first benchmarks

GMK EVO-T1: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H Intel Arc Graphics 140T, 0.9 kg
   » GMKtec EVO-T1 review: Mini PC with Intel Core Ultra 9 for AI models, LLMs and gaming via OCuLink

Beelink SEi13 Pro: Intel Core i9-13900HK Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 0.8 kg
   » Beelink SEi13 uses the exact same CPU as the GTi13 Ultra but in a smaller and leaner package

GMK NucBox K11: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.6 kg
   » Sleek GMKtec K11 mini PC with AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS and 32GB DDR5 gets big price cut

Beelink SER8: AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS AMD Radeon 780M, 0.8 kg
   » Beelink Mini PC SER8 with AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS and Radeon 780M iGPU gets sizeable Amazon discount

Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station: Intel Core i9-12900H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 1.3 kg
   » Beelink makes EX mini PC eGPU dock free for anyone to build with open-source documentation

   » Beelink makes EX mini PC eGPU dock free for anyone to build with open-source documentation

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-07- 6)