Notebookcheck Logo

Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8

P5 Plus 1TB

The Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 is a fast NVMe SSD in the M.2 2280 form factor. It is certified to work with the Playstation 5 and uses Micron Advanced 3D NAND. The read speeds are specified with up to 6600 MB/s, writes at up to 5000 MB/s (both sequential).

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced23.03.2023

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
39.6 pt (45%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.687 -98%
...
Kingston OM3PGP41024P-A0
37.7 -5%
Phison E31 2 TB
38.1 -4%
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
38.5 -3%
Wodposit WPBSN4M8-1TGP
38.6 -3%
Fikwot FN955
38.8 -2%
BIWIN CE980Y28900-1TB
39 -2%
SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X179N GL
39.1 -1%
TeamGroup T-Create CLASSIC PCIe 4.0 DL
39.6 0%
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV1T02
39.6 0%
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
39.6
Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0
39.7 0%
Western Digital PC SN8000S SDEPNRK-1T00
39.9 1%
Acer N7000 1 TB
40.1 1%
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
40.2 2%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
40.4 2%
Phison PS5021-E21 512GB
40.4 2%
Micron 3500 MTFDKBA512TGD
40.5 2%
Lexar NM790 2TB
41.1 4%
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
41.1 4%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 8TB
88.2 123%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 2201.56     avg: 2572     median: 2572.5 (43%)     max: 2943.42 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 906.25     avg: 1058     median: 1058.2 (39%)     max: 1210.23 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 3417.67     avg: 4147     median: 4146.5 (15%)     max: 4875.34 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 5751     avg: 6687     median: 6631 (41%)     max: 7410 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 2602     avg: 2944     median: 3007 (42%)     max: 3294 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1890     avg: 2492     median: 2593 (41%)     max: 2718 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.023     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.058 ms
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.03     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.085 ms
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 2078     avg: 2420     median: 2546.6 (43%)     max: 2695.61 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 1358     avg: 2024     median: 2156.5 (42%)     max: 2254.37 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 149.1     avg: 173.2     median: 169.4 (33%)     max: 203.8 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 49.34     avg: 59.1     median: 58.8 (19%)     max: 74.57 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 2496     avg: 3507     median: 3942.4 (35%)     max: 4286.27 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 3333.37     avg: 4055     median: 3889 (30%)     max: 4887.18 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
271.3 MB/s (25%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
70.1 MB/s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
4265 MB/s (23%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
2503 MB/s (28%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
342.9 MB/s (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
619 MB/s (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
4752 MB/s (32%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
5203 MB/s (28%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 119.3     avg: 218.3     median: 201 (46%)     max: 366 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 49.8     avg: 63.7     median: 63.2 (18%)     max: 87.3 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 601     avg: 2302     median: 2659 (39%)     max: 2932 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 1350     avg: 2446     median: 2835 (35%)     max: 3228 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 2991     avg: 4016     median: 4251 (41%)     max: 4624 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2945     avg: 3397     median: 3396 (40%)     max: 3972 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 4562     avg: 4827     median: 4907 (34%)     max: 5004 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 5202     avg: 6318     median: 6551 (41%)     max: 6677 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 5076     avg: 5967     median: 6442 (40%)     max: 6581 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400250026002700280029003000310032003300340035003600370038003900400041004200430044004500460047004800490050005100520053005400550056005700580059006000610062006300640065006600Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Amazon Logo
  • $210.00
    Crucial T500 PCIe Gen4 NVMe 1TB SSD, Up to 7,300MB/s, TLC NAND, Laptop & Desktop (PC) Compatible, for Creatives and Gamers, Solid State Drive, Includes 1Mo Adobe CC – CT1000T500SSD8
  • $199.99
    Crucial P3 Plus PCIe Gen4 NVMe 1TB SSD, Up to 5,000MB/s Read, Laptop & Desktop (PC) Compatible, Solid State Drive – CT1000P3SSD8
  • $194.99
    Crucial T705 PCIe Gen5 NVMe 1TB SSD, Up to 13,600MB/s, TLC NAND, Intel & Ryzen Compatible, for Hardcore Gaming & High-Speed Storage, Solid State Drive, Includes 1Mo Adobe CC – CT1000T705SSD3
  • $164.36
    Crucial P310 2280 1TB PCIe Gen4 NVMe Gaming PS5 SSD with Heatsink, Up to 7,100MB/s, PlayStation5, Laptop & Desktop (PC) Compatible, Solid State Drive - CT1000P310SSD5-01
  • $168.59
    Crucial E100 1TB M.2 NVMe PCIe Gen4 Internal SSD, Up to 5,000MB/s, Laptop & Desktop Compatible - CT1000E100SSD8

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 18. 16:04:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 14 Mar 2026 03:44:58 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3971 +0.027s ... 0.034s

#7 got single benchmarks 3971 +0.012s ... 0.047s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +4.187s ... 4.234s

#10 return log +0.338s ... 4.572s

Notebook reviews with Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8

Beelink GTI13 Ultra mini PC review: A Mac Mini alternative with Intel Core i9

Beelink GTI13 Ultra mini PC review: A Mac Mini alternative with Intel Core i9

For $600, the GTI13 Ultra is incredible bang for the buck as it comes standard with 32 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, Intel 13th gen CPU, integrated microphone, speakers, and more that most mini PCs lack in this price range.
Intel Core i9-13900HK, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 1.3 kg
XMG Focus 15 in review

Schenker XMG Focus 15 (E23) budget gaming laptop review: A lot of performance at a lesser price than the Pro 15

If you can do without a metal case and a full RGB keyboard, you do not necessarily have to go for the expensive XMG Pro 15. In our test, the XMG Focus 15 is just as performant and only has to take a back seat in few aspects. In return, the base price of the Focus 15 is about €400 less than that of the Pro 15 for practically similar performance.
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.6", 2.4 kg
Schenker XMG Pro 15 E23 (PD50SND-G) gaming laptop reviewed: Here's to work-play balance!

Schenker XMG Pro 15 E23 (PD50SND-G) gaming laptop reviewed: Here's to work-play balance!

A solid and understated design paired with computational power. This is the figure the XMG Pro 15 E23 cuts in our review. Whether as a laptop for content creators or gamers, the XMG Pro 15 impresses with powerful Nvidia graphics and a wonderful QHD display which covers the P3 color space.
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.6", 2.4 kg
Schenker XMG Focus 17 (E23) in review: Gaming laptop with RTX 4070 doesn't skimp on performance

Schenker XMG Focus 17 (E23) in review: Gaming laptop with RTX 4070 doesn't skimp on performance

The Focus 17 wants to convince with its core competencies alone. And those read quite impressive: An i9-13900HX with 32 threads, a 240 Hz panel, and the RTX 4070 promise a high speed even in current games without sacrificing details. On the other hand, our review will show where savings have been made.
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 17.3", 2.9 kg

Schenker XMG Focus 15 (E23): Intel Core i9-13900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2.4 kg
  External Review » Schenker XMG Focus 15 (E23)

Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23: Intel Core i9-13900HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.5 kg
  External Review » Schenker XMG Neo 16 E23

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-03-23)