Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW 980 Pro MZ-V8P500BW

The Samsung SSD 980 PRO 500GB MZ-V8P500BW is a fast high end PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 2280 SSD. It uses the Samsung Elpis controller with 8 channels, 1 GB LPDDR4 cache, SLC-Cache and 3D-NAND TLC memory modules from Samsung (V-NAND v6). Samsung specifies the drive with 6900 MB/s read and 5000 MB/s write (SLC cached, 1100 MB/s TLC). The power consumption is between 0.035W (idle) 7.4 W.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity500 GB
InterfaceNVMe
ControllerSamsung Elpis S4LV003
Announced30.08.2020

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
69.6 pt (82%)
64 GB eMMC Flash -96%
...
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G -27%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB -27%
Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162 -24%
Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162 -24%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB -24%
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0) -22%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB -20%
SK Hynix Gold P31 1TB SHGP31-1000GM-2 -17%
Corsair MP600 -16%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ 0%
SSSTC CA6-8D1024 4%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 12%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW 13%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB 14%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR 16%
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E 21%
0%
100%
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 1494.32     avg: 1707     median: 1810.3 (30%)     max: 1817.3 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 648.78     avg: 854     median: 883 (33%)     max: 1030.23 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 1674.94     avg: 1936     median: 2030.2 (55%)     max: 2103.58 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 4036     avg: 5890     median: 6364.5 (70%)     max: 6793 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 1923     avg: 2468     median: 2558 (58%)     max: 2832 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1439     avg: 2313     median: 2569.5 (72%)     max: 2673 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.021     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.193 ms
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.039     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.075 ms
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 1732.85     avg: 2071     median: 2153.8 (56%)     max: 2242.9 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 1143.26     avg: 1841     median: 1968.7 (67%)     max: 2282.6 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 63.53     avg: 138     median: 140.3 (1%)     max: 206.11 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 39.24     avg: 59     median: 61.8 (23%)     max: 73.2 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 1264.91     avg: 2592     median: 2583.6 (53%)     max: 3937.18 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 2561.55     avg: 4129     median: 4212.2 (73%)     max: 5529.13 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 67.31     avg: 191     median: 225.3 (20%)     max: 244.6 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 38.32     avg: 69.1     median: 78.8 (2%)     max: 80.39 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 1985     avg: 3528     median: 4016.2 (22%)     max: 4094 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 2049     avg: 3543     median: 4012.5 (75%)     max: 4099 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 432.3     avg: 583     median: 592.5 (35%)     max: 715.3 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 452.4     avg: 636     median: 653.9 (41%)     max: 783.4 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 3423     avg: 4666     median: 5071 (90%)     max: 5100 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 3123     avg: 5902     median: 6800.9 (76%)     max: 6884 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 60.6     avg: 148     median: 151.6 (46%)     max: 228 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 41.8     avg: 64     median: 67.3 (24%)     max: 79.6 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 502     avg: 1804     median: 2038 (48%)     max: 2636 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 1146     avg: 2409     median: 2687 (64%)     max: 3117 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 1887     avg: 3369     median: 3770.5 (76%)     max: 4048 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2068     avg: 3457     median: 3836 (83%)     max: 4089 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 3400     avg: 4498     median: 4856.5 (81%)     max: 4877 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 3415     avg: 5936     median: 6767.5 (95%)     max: 6794 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 3362     avg: 5366     median: 5661.5 (83%)     max: 6778 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400250026002700280029003000310032003300340035003600370038003900400041004200430044004500460047004800490050005100520053005400550056005700580059006000610062006300640065006600670068002996.953343.913345.383347.473352.33353.143353.563354.813359.853360.063360.273360.483360.93361.323361.523361.733362.363362.573363.623363.833364.043364.043364.463364.883364.883364.883365.723365.723366.353366.563366.983367.583367.613368.863369.053371.563374.113374.363381.243382.713384.173384.593386.423387.533391.723392.353392.353392.563399.693407.661209.321209.731210.7818732230.682457.564271.334289.744614.364839.774840.194844.384845.434845.844847.14847.944852.754855.474855.684856.944856.944857.154857.984858.614858.824859.034859.244859.874860.084860.914861.124863.435202.96068.356638.056661.496678.036688.496714.2467276735.376743.966750.446751.496759.236768.446772.426775.776783.36791.054890.564895.594896.774897.064898.234899.164899.374899.484899.94900.944904.034908.885636.416257.066280.186349.226697.736699.616699.776702.56704.836706.296706.716707.746715.286715.296716.546717.576718.416719.876722.846727.426727.456734.166744.376745.496746.336746.476746.816748.486750.16750.366751.366752.416753.086753.56753.886755.986756.186756.816107.276783.096784.146784.146785.196786.446786.446786.446786.866787.076787.286787.496787.76787.916788.336788.746789.166789.166789.376789.796790.216790.426790.426791.056791.056791.056791.266791.266791.476792.726793.566793.566794.196794.46794.616794.616795.026795.656796.286796.76796.76797.336797.546798.376798.796799.846801.066801.096801.36802.35Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.17
log 21. 21:55:14

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 17 Oct 2021 22:43:07 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#5 getting avg benchmarks for device 3591 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#6 got single benchmarks 3591 +0.011s ... 0.02s

#7 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#8 min, max, avg, median took s +0.443s ... 0.463s

#9 return log +0.012s ... 0.475s

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Notebook reviews with Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW

Intel NUC11PAQi7: Intel Core i7-1165G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 0.6 kg
  Review » Intel NUC11PAQi7 Panther Canyon Mini PC Review: Tiger Lake Done Right

Intel NUC11PHKi7C: Intel Core i7-1165G7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 1.4 kg
  Review » Kaby Lake-G Is History: Intel Phantom Canyon NUC11PHKi7C Review

Schenker VIA 14 Late 2020: Intel Core i5-1135G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, 14.00", 1.1 kg
  Review » Schenker VIA 14 laptop in review: Lightweight magnesium ultrabook with extremely long battery life

Schenker XMG Core 14: Intel Core i5-1135G7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Schenker XMG Core 14 (Clevo NV40MB) laptop review: baby gamer

Intel NUC11PAQi7: Intel Core i7-1165G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 0.6 kg
   » The fastest Core i7-1165G7 PC available is now over two times faster than the slowest Core i7-1165G7 laptop

Intel NUC11PHKi7C: Intel Core i7-1165G7 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 1.4 kg
   » 100 W Core i7-8809G vs. 28 W Core i7-1165G7: Can Tiger Lake outperform the exotic Intel-AMD chipset?

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Laptop harddisks (HDD, SSD) benchmarks > Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW SSD Benchmarks
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-12-19)