Notebookcheck Logo

Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T

C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T

The Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T is a mid-range PCIe SSD running with a Phison P55027-E27-61 controller.

SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced06.08.2025

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
39.1 pt (45%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.717 -98%
...
Western Digital SN740 SDDPTQE-2T00
37.8 -3%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
38.1 -3%
Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
38.2 -2%
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
38.3 -2%
Intel Optane 905P 480GB 2.5
38.3 -2%
Kioxia KXG70ZNV512G
38.4 -2%
Lenovo UMIS RPETJ1T24MHP2QDQ
38.5 -2%
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
38.7 -1%
Lexar NQ7A1
38.7 -1%
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T
39.1
Micron 2550 MTFDKBA512TGE
39.3 1%
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
39.3 1%
ADATA XPG Gammix S70 1TB
39.3 1%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW
39.4 1%
Phison E31 2 TB
39.5 1%
Micron 2600 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QHK
39.6 1%
Wodposit WPBSN4M8-1TGP
39.9 2%
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BTW
40.1 3%
Fikwot FN955
40.3 3%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4TB
87.8 125%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
2132 MB/s (36%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
881 MB/s (33%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
2401 MB/s (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 3390     avg: 4727     median: 4983 (31%)     max: 5809 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 1693     avg: 2566     median: 2555 (35%)     max: 3451 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1169     avg: 1492     median: 1636 (26%)     max: 1672 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.015     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.063 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.053     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.126 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 1194.34     avg: 2095     median: 2068.4 (35%)     max: 3023.1 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 600.82     avg: 962     median: 1123.4 (22%)     max: 1160.79 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 142.34     avg: 197.2     median: 197.9 (39%)     max: 251.38 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 46.19     avg: 51.3     median: 49.1 (16%)     max: 58.66 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 2297.25     avg: 2737     median: 2348.4 (21%)     max: 3566.81 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 4523.34     avg: 4790     median: 4658.9 (37%)     max: 5187.83 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 136.8     avg: 172.6     median: 182.5 (16%)     max: 198.5 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 57.67     avg: 61     median: 62.4 (2%)     max: 62.89 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 2560     avg: 3652     median: 4171 (22%)     max: 4226 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 2999     avg: 3139     median: 3111 (35%)     max: 3307 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 387.4     avg: 609     median: 704 (15%)     max: 736.8 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 455.8     avg: 500     median: 497.8 (7%)     max: 547.5 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 5409     avg: 5517     median: 5465 (37%)     max: 5678 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 5830     avg: 6208     median: 5863 (31%)     max: 6930 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 121.9     avg: 165.4     median: 179.1 (41%)     max: 195.2 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 55.1     avg: 61.4     median: 61.6 (18%)     max: 67.5 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 426     avg: 2029     median: 2348 (35%)     max: 3313 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 745     avg: 1847     median: 2354 (29%)     max: 2442 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 2665     avg: 3815     median: 4251 (41%)     max: 4529 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2751     avg: 3020     median: 2952 (35%)     max: 3357 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 5415     avg: 5638     median: 5471 (38%)     max: 6027 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 5833     avg: 6237     median: 5846 (36%)     max: 7031 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 5543     avg: 5720     median: 5801 (36%)     max: 5817 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900200021002200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400350036003700380039004000410042004300440045004600470048004900500051005200530054005500560057005800590060006100620063006400650066006700680069007000Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 10. 08:41:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 08 Apr 2026 05:07:06 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4302 +0.024s ... 0.031s

#7 got single benchmarks 4302 +0.01s ... 0.041s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +3.62s ... 3.661s

#10 return log +0.126s ... 3.788s

Notebook reviews with Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T

Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 review: Can a German budget gaming laptop compete with the big players?

Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 review: Can a German budget gaming laptop compete with the big players?

With the Erazer Deputy 15 P1, Medion aims to challenge the competition in the affordable gaming-laptop segment. In addition to a powerful Core 7 CPU, the 15-inch laptop comes equipped with a GeForce RTX 5060. Can this "German" laptop hold its own against international rivals?
Intel Core 7 250H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.6", 2.2 kg
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 with RTX 5050 in review

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 Review: Evaluating the RTX 5050 Laptop's worth as a lower mid-range GPU

The Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 is the first notebook based on the GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop to land in our editorial office. Our review tests the RTX 5050 Laptop to find out how the new lower mid-range Blackwell GPU performs against the RTX 5060 and RTX 5070, and what the 17-incher is generally capable of.
Intel Core 5 210H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 17.3", 2.7 kg
Dynabook Portege Z40L-N laptop review: Lighter than you might expect

Dynabook Portege Z40L-N laptop review: Lighter than you might expect

The Portege Z40L-N is several hundred grams lighter than many well-known 14-inch subnotebooks while still offering the latest Intel Lunar Lake processors and relatively easy serviceability.
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 14", 961 g

Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761: Intel Core 7 250H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Medion Erazer Deputy 15 P1 MD62761

Dynabook Portege Z40L-N: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 14.00", 1 kg
  External Review » Dynabook Portege Z40L-N

   » Dynabook Portege Z40L-N exhibits similar SSD throttling issues as its predecessor

   » Dynabook Portege Z40L-N is one of the lightest 14-inch laptops available with some hidden drawbacks

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-08- 6)