Notebookcheck Logo

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

The Kioxia KXG80ZNV1T02 is a fast PCIe Gen4x4 NVMe SSD of the XG8 series. It uses 112-Layer-3-D-TLC flash memory (3 bits per cell) from Kioxia and a SLC-cache for high short term read and write speeds.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced25.08.2023

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
47.1 pt (66%)
64 GB eMMC Flash
2.32 -95%
...
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014
44.6 -5%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
44.7 -5%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
45.3 -4%
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
46.1 -2%
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
46.3 -2%
ADATA XPG Gammix S70 1TB
46.3 -2%
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
46.4 -1%
Kioxia KXG70ZNV512G
46.5 -1%
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBK1T0TFK
46.7 -1%
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
47.1
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 500GB MZ-V8P500BW
48.1 2%
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
48.3 3%
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
48.5 3%
Phison PS5021-E21 512GB
48.6 3%
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
48.8 4%
Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8
49.4 5%
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV1T02
50.5 7%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
51.1 8%
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
51.4 9%
...
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
71.7 52%
0%
100%
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 2650.15     avg: 2762     median: 2755.4 (46%)     max: 2881.21 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 1041.54     avg: 1140     median: 1151.2 (43%)     max: 1227.21 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 3655.28     avg: 3953     median: 4012.9 (36%)     max: 4190.66 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 4988     avg: 6483     median: 6367 (59%)     max: 8209 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 2771     avg: 2898     median: 2858 (50%)     max: 3106 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1480     avg: 2420     median: 2399 (9%)     max: 3403 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.02     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.068 ms
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.037     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.111 ms
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 2082.65     avg: 2297     median: 2349.3 (46%)     max: 2408.06 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 892.37     avg: 1800     median: 1771.6 (52%)     max: 2765.55 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 184.27     avg: 195     median: 193.2 (53%)     max: 209.28 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 60.31     avg: 61     median: 61 (19%)     max: 61.69 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 2831.66     avg: 4060     median: 4138.2 (48%)     max: 5132.02 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 5265.97     avg: 5589     median: 5627.3 (56%)     max: 5836.76 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 141.6     avg: 183.2     median: 183.1 (17%)     max: 225.1 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 58.47     avg: 64.1     median: 65.1 (2%)     max: 67.64 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 3539     avg: 4614     median: 5120 (28%)     max: 5182 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 2536     avg: 3677     median: 4233 (51%)     max: 4261 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 424.8     avg: 512     median: 498.7 (16%)     max: 625.7 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 463.2     avg: 600     median: 602.6 (10%)     max: 730.4 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 5395     avg: 5548     median: 5534.5 (49%)     max: 5727 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 6961     avg: 6995     median: 6991 (55%)     max: 7035 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
471 MB/s (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
959 MB/s (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 142.3     avg: 182.6     median: 184.6 (43%)     max: 219 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 56.6     avg: 63.8     median: 64.5 (19%)     max: 69.6 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 488     avg: 1560     median: 1561.5 (32%)     max: 2627 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 1003     avg: 2416     median: 2415 (41%)     max: 3829 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 3641     avg: 4305     median: 4342 (54%)     max: 4893 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2735     avg: 3302     median: 3409.5 (60%)     max: 3654 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 5355     avg: 5445     median: 5437.5 (49%)     max: 5549 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 6169     avg: 6416     median: 6309 (48%)     max: 6876 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 5244     avg: 6169     median: 6388 (49%)     max: 6656 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900200021002200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400350036003700380039004000410042004300440045004600470048004900500051005200530054005500560057005800590060006100620063006400650066006700Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.26
log 01. 02:54:52

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:38:25 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.007s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#5 getting avg benchmarks for device 4043 +0.014s ... 0.021s

#6 got single benchmarks 4043 +0.014s ... 0.035s

#7 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#8 min, max, avg, median took s +0.72s ... 0.755s

#9 return log +0.011s ... 0.766s

Notebook reviews with Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02

AMD Radeon RX 7900M performance debut: Alienware m18 R1 laptop review

AMD Radeon RX 7900M performance debut: Alienware m18 R1 laptop review

AMD knocked it out of the park with its Ryzen series of mobile CPUs, but there's no question that its discrete mobile GPUs have been falling behind. The Radeon ...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | AMD Radeon RX 7900M | 18.00" | 3.9 kg
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 Review - Multimedia Convertible with faster components

Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 Review - Multimedia Convertible with faster components

Microsoft’s Surface Laptop Studio is a pretty unique product and the second generation gets much faster components as well as more ports, but the foldable displ...
Intel Core i7-13700H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 14.40" | 2 kg
HP Victus 16 laptop review: Full HD gamer with RTX 4070

HP Victus 16 laptop review: Full HD gamer with RTX 4070

The Victus 16 costs slightly less than an Omen 16 with comparable hardware. Read on to find out whether or which cost-saving measures come to the fore. Our test...
Intel Core i7-13700H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 16.10" | 2.4 kg
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX performance debut: Alienware m16 R1 laptop review

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX performance debut: Alienware m16 R1 laptop review

The Alienware m16 R1 includes everything but the kitchen sink. You'll have to choose carefully, however, as some configurations may be less buggy than others.
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 3.1 kg

HP Victus 16-r0077ng: Intel Core i7-13700H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.10", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP Victus 16-r0077ng

Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060: Intel Core i7-13700H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.40", 2 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060

Alienware m16 R1 AMD: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 3.1 kg
  External Review » Alienware m16 R1 AMD

Alienware m18 R1 AMD: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX AMD Radeon RX 7900M, 18.00", 3.9 kg
   » Radeon RX 7900M Alienware m18 R1 bugs addressed via display driver workaround

Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2 RTX 4060: Intel Core i7-13700H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 14.40", 2 kg
   » Microsoft's new Surface Laptops are expensive, but the products are not good enough

HP Victus 16-r0077ng: Intel Core i7-13700H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.10", 2.4 kg
   » Affordable HP Victus 15 gaming laptop records massive 33% discount at Best Buy

Please share our article, every link counts!