Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 

Lite-On CA5-8D512

Lite-On CA5-8D512 CA5-8D512

The Lite-On CA5-8D512 ist a fast PCIe SSD in M.2 2280 format. It is manufactured by the Solid State Storage Technology Corp (SSSTC) and features 3D TLC NAND flash memory. It is specified with up to 3,300 MB/s read and 2,100 MB/s write (maybe for the 1TB version only) and uses PCIe NVMe Gen 3x4.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2
Capacity512 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced19.05.2020

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
41.8 pt (50%)
SanDisk DF4128 -92%
...
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ -4%
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 -3%
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) -3%
HP EX900 Pro 1 TB -3%
Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD -2%
BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB -2%
SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N -1%
ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB 0%
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N 0%
Lite-On CA5-8D512
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 1%
Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD 1%
Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G 1%
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB 2%
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G 3%
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G (RAID 0) 5%
2x Micron 2300 512 GB (RAID 0) 6%
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB2T0HMLB 8%
Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02 8%
...
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB 102%
0%
100%
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 505.2     avg: 1514     median: 1271.9 (21%)     max: 3007 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 441.8     avg: 774     median: 650.2 (24%)     max: 1353 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 1265     avg: 1834     median: 1797.8 (49%)     max: 2474.39 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 2392     avg: 2863     median: 3007 (33%)     max: 3059 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 1034     avg: 1271     median: 1328 (30%)     max: 1353 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 913     avg: 1072     median: 1105 (31%)     max: 1206 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.028     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.167 ms
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.046     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.058 ms
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 812.64     avg: 1009     median: 1041.3 (27%)     max: 1125.32 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 664.71     avg: 795     median: 855.6 (29%)     max: 858.92 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 90.18     avg: 115     median: 119 (1%)     max: 147.65 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 46.61     avg: 50.3     median: 49.3 (19%)     max: 56.58 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 810.46     avg: 1462     median: 1314.3 (30%)     max: 2090.14 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 2019.26     avg: 2263     median: 2124.9 (37%)     max: 2933.05 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 114.1     avg: 134     median: 119 (11%)     max: 161.8 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 51.87     avg: 55.3     median: 53.6 (1%)     max: 60.59 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 1743     avg: 2135     median: 2219 (46%)     max: 2258 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 2092     avg: 2305     median: 2283 (42%)     max: 2473 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 394.8     avg: 478     median: 491 (29%)     max: 514.9 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 372.6     avg: 518     median: 539.7 (34%)     max: 585.6 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 2176     avg: 2214     median: 2205 (39%)     max: 2253 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 3171     avg: 3254     median: 3204 (36%)     max: 3372 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 105     avg: 131     median: 123 (37%)     max: 173 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 48     avg: 53.6     median: 52.2 (19%)     max: 62.5 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 398     avg: 1053     median: 1223 (29%)     max: 1252 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 907     avg: 1428     median: 1557 (37%)     max: 1562 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 1787     avg: 2146     median: 2240 (49%)     max: 2248 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2120     avg: 2297     median: 2231 (48%)     max: 2587 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 2206     avg: 2236     median: 2232 (37%)     max: 2267 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 3128     avg: 3219     median: 3166 (45%)     max: 3400 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 2853     avg: 3099     median: 3044 (45%)     max: 3356 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900200021002200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400161.48161.9162.01182.41628.441705.042056.62220.082431.022538.232579.922873.853238.193239.053241.573242.833243.463244.53246.63247.233248.283249.113249.113249.963251.423252.473253.113254.793255.23255.23255.23255.213255.413260.233260.443262.753264.033264.613265.933267.363268.413270.33277.693280.213288.543293.033293.373294.53296.933300.392139.12244.582248.782250.452255.072272.052278.773045.063063.13066.673082.393089.523093.933094.773098.333098.333102.953103.783105.673105.883106.33107.563108.613110.083110.293110.923111.753112.593113.643115.323118.053119.093119.933122.663122.873123.293123.923126.013126.223128.953132.313142.793143.213149.713164.813175.33202.773203.43209.693218.922836.42976.913005.013005.433008.573009.23009.833012.143015.913017.593019.93022.213022.213028.53029.343032.483033.953035.843036.893040.243041.923042.763042.973047.793049.053052.23053.453054.293054.293054.713059.123059.953060.793063.13065.413065.623071.913072.753072.963073.383074.013075.473076.313081.143083.233083.653084.913084.913091.833096.862210.193261.073263.173263.383263.593263.593263.83264.013264.013264.433264.643264.643264.853264.853265.063265.063265.063265.273265.273265.273265.273265.273265.273265.483265.483265.693265.693265.693265.693265.693265.893266.13266.313266.313266.523266.523266.523266.733266.733266.733266.943266.943266.943267.363267.363267.573267.783267.993267.993268.22576.773333.263333.473333.473333.473333.683333.683334.093334.093334.093334.513334.723335.143335.353335.353336.613338.073338.283338.493338.73338.73338.73351.053356.073368.843369.053401.493401.913403.163403.793404.213404.423404.423404.423404.843405.053405.053405.263405.673405.673405.673405.883406.093406.33406.33406.33406.33406.933407.143407.14Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 23. 21:52:47

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 19 Jul 2021 20:50:39 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#5 getting avg benchmarks for device 3471 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#6 got single benchmarks 3471 +0.01s ... 0.02s

#7 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#8 min, max, avg, median took s +0.465s ... 0.486s

#9 return log +0.011s ... 0.496s

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Notebook reviews with Lite-On CA5-8D512

Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U NVIDIA GeForce MX350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Huawei MateBook 14 2020 laptop review: 3:2 clamshell convinces both with Intel and AMD CPUs

Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00: Intel Core i5-10210U Intel UHD Graphics 620, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 laptop review: Comet Lake update doesn't add much

Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328: Intel Core i7-10750H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  Review » 2020 Razer Blade 15 Base Model Laptop Review: The 10th Gen Intel Comet Lake-H Update

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz: Intel Core i7-10875H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » 2020 Razer Blade Pro 17 Review: Do you Really Need a 300 Hz Laptop?

Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K: Intel Core i7-1065G7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  Review » 2020 Razer Blade Stealth GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Laptop Review: Like the 2019 Version, But Done Right

Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U NVIDIA GeForce MX350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz: Intel Core i7-10875H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz

Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U NVIDIA GeForce MX350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Outdated Comet Lake CPU in the Huawei MateBook 14 is only convincing when it comes to battery life

Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00: Intel Core i5-10210U Intel UHD Graphics 620, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Lenovo's new ThinkPads T14 & T15 without working Turbo Boost

   » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 with Intel CPU runs very hot in the test

Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328: Intel Core i7-10750H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 15.60", 2.1 kg
   » Here are all the differences between the 2019 and 2020 Razer Blade 15 models in one table

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz: Intel Core i7-10875H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 17.30", 2.7 kg
   » In an embarrassment for Nvidia, the cheaper GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q can outperform some GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q laptops

   » After testing over two dozen gaming laptops with the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, the 2020 Razer Blade Pro 17 comes out to be the fastest of them all

Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K: Intel Core i7-1065G7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 13.30", 1.5 kg
   » The 2019 Razer Blade Stealth series was a huge mess. The 2020 series puts it back on track

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Laptop harddisks (HDD, SSD) benchmarks > Lite-On CA5-8D512 SSD Benchmarks
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-05-19)