Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Lite-On CA5-8D512

Lite-On CA5-8D512 CA5-8D512

The Lite-On CA5-8D512 ist a fast PCIe SSD in M.2 2280 format. It is manufactured by the Solid State Storage Technology Corp (SSSTC) and features 3D TLC NAND flash memory. It is specified with up to 3,300 MB/s read and 2,100 MB/s write (maybe for the 1TB version only) and uses PCIe NVMe Gen 3x4.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2
Capacity512 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced19.05.2020

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
40.3 pt (48%)
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 505.2     avg: 1420     median: 1044.9 (17%)     max: 3007 MB/s
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 377.61     avg: 695     median: 621.7 (23%)     max: 1353 MB/s
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 2392     avg: 3040     median: 3022 (33%)     max: 3922 Points
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 1034     avg: 1299     median: 1339.5 (30%)     max: 1439 Points
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 913     avg: 1171     median: 1113 (31%)     max: 1668 Points
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.028     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.167 ms
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.034     avg: 0     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.058 ms
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 812.64     avg: 1025     median: 1070.2 (28%)     max: 1125.32 MB/s
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 664.71     avg: 883     median: 855.9 (29%)     max: 1321.07 MB/s
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 90.18     avg: 117     median: 119.1 (1%)     max: 147.65 MB/s
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 46.61     avg: 50.4     median: 50.2 (19%)     max: 56.58 MB/s
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 810.46     avg: 1565     median: 1660.3 (32%)     max: 2090.14 MB/s
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 2019.26     avg: 2379     median: 2172.2 (38%)     max: 2955 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 114.1     avg: 134     median: 124.1 (11%)     max: 161.8 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 51.87     avg: 55.1     median: 53.9 (1%)     max: 60.59 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 1743     avg: 2135     median: 2219 (12%)     max: 2258 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 2092     avg: 2305     median: 2283 (42%)     max: 2473 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 394.8     avg: 473     median: 483.5 (18%)     max: 514.9 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 372.6     avg: 526     median: 551.8 (23%)     max: 585.6 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 2176     avg: 2214     median: 2207.7 (38%)     max: 2253 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 3171     avg: 3282     median: 3278 (36%)     max: 3418.2 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
1254 MB/s (47%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
1388 MB/s (49%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 105     avg: 131     median: 129 (39%)     max: 173 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 48     avg: 53.6     median: 52.8 (19%)     max: 62.5 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 907     avg: 1452     median: 1558 (37%)     max: 1568 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 2206     avg: 2234     median: 2229 (37%)     max: 2267 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 3128     avg: 3231     median: 3206.5 (45%)     max: 3400 MB/s
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 2853     avg: 3133     median: 3144.5 (45%)     max: 3356 MB/s
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.17
log 28. 08:10:09

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 26 Nov 2021 22:39:50 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#5 getting avg benchmarks for device 3471 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#6 got single benchmarks 3471 +0.014s ... 0.024s

#7 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#8 min, max, avg, median took s +0.43s ... 0.454s

#9 return log +0.013s ... 0.466s

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Notebook reviews with Lite-On CA5-8D512

Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U NVIDIA GeForce MX350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Huawei MateBook 14 2020 laptop review: 3:2 clamshell convinces both with Intel and AMD CPUs

Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), 16.00", 2 kg
  Review » Huawei MateBook 16 AMD Review - Multimedia laptop impresses with its Ryzen 7 CPU

Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00: Intel Core i5-10210U Intel UHD Graphics 620, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 laptop review: Comet Lake update doesn't add much

Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328: Intel Core i7-10750H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 15.60", 2.1 kg
  Review » 2020 Razer Blade 15 Base Model Laptop Review: The 10th Gen Intel Comet Lake-H Update

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz: Intel Core i7-10875H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  Review » 2020 Razer Blade Pro 17 Review: Do you Really Need a 300 Hz Laptop?

Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED: Intel Core i7-1165G7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  Review » Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 in review: Mobile gamer with OLED panel

Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K: Intel Core i7-1065G7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 13.30", 1.5 kg
  Review » 2020 Razer Blade Stealth GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q Laptop Review: Like the 2019 Version, But Done Right

Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U NVIDIA GeForce MX350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel

Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 16, R7 5800H

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz: Intel Core i7-10875H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz

Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel: Intel Core i7-10510U NVIDIA GeForce MX350, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Outdated Comet Lake CPU in the Huawei MateBook 14 is only convincing when it comes to battery life

Huawei MateBook 16 R7 5800H: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), 16.00", 2 kg
   » The Huawei MateBook 16 AMD offers a lot of power and has an excellent price-to-performance ratio

Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20S1S06B00: Intel Core i5-10210U Intel UHD Graphics 620, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Lenovo's new ThinkPads T14 & T15 without working Turbo Boost

   » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 with Intel CPU runs very hot in the test

Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328: Intel Core i7-10750H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 15.60", 2.1 kg
   » Here are all the differences between the 2019 and 2020 Razer Blade 15 models in one table

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz: Intel Core i7-10875H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 17.30", 2.7 kg
   » In an embarrassment for Nvidia, the cheaper GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q can outperform some GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q laptops

   » After testing over two dozen gaming laptops with the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, the 2020 Razer Blade Pro 17 comes out to be the fastest of them all

Razer Blade Stealth Core i7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4K: Intel Core i7-1065G7 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 13.30", 1.5 kg
   » The 2019 Razer Blade Stealth series was a huge mess. The 2020 series puts it back on track

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Laptop harddisks (HDD, SSD) benchmarks > Lite-On CA5-8D512 SSD Benchmarks
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-05-19)