2020 Razer Blade Pro 17 Review: Do you Really Need a 300 Hz Laptop?

Fast display for a fast laptop. It's the first 17.3-inch gaming laptop to offer refresh rate options greater than 240 Hz. Unless if you're a super enthusiast, however, it's gonna be hard to tell the difference between 300 Hz and last year's 240 Hz panel.

Allen Ngo 👁, Published 06/27/2020 🇮🇹 🇪🇸 ...

Razer recently refreshed their 17.3-inch Blade Pro 17 series for 2020 with 10th gen Core i7 processors, optional GeForce Super Max-Q GPUs, more display options, and a longer Shift key. Our unit here is the least expensive configuration of the latest model that's notable for its 300 Hz display as opposed to "only" 240 Hz on last year's model.

Other than the processor, display, and slight keyboard differences, the 2020 Blade Pro 17 shares essentially the same features and design as the 2019 Blade Pro 17. Thus, we recommend checking out our existing review on the 2019 model to learn more about the chassis, ports, and other physical features of the laptop.

Direct competitors to the Blade Pro 17 include other high-end ultra-thin 17.3-inch gaming laptops like the MSI GS75, Asus Zephyrus S GX701, Dell Alienware m17 R2, or the Eluktronics RP-17.

More Razer reviews:

The 2020 Blade Pro 17 series (Image source: Razer)

Test device courtesy of Razerzone.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Blade Pro 17 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1420 MHz, Memory: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 442.53, Manual

Memory

16 GB

, Samsung DDR4-3200, 21-21-21-47, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, SHP14D8, glossy: no, 300 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM470

Storage

Lite-On CA5-8D512, 512 GB

Soundcard

Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

5 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 5 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD reader (UHS-III)

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 395 x 260 ( = 0.78 x 15.55 x 10.24 in)

Battery

70 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Razer Synapse, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.718 kg ( = 95.87 oz / 5.99 pounds), Power Supply: 784 g ( = 27.65 oz / 1.73 pounds)

Price

2600 USD

Links

Razer homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.4 %	06/2020	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.7 kg	19.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
81.2 %	12/2019	Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.7 kg	18.7 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
82.9 %	06/2019	MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.3 kg	18.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
84.2 %	02/2020	Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.6 kg	20.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.5 %	05/2020	Aorus 17G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.7 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Case

Aorus 17G XB Alienware m17 R2 P41E Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17G XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	212 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	208.5 MB/s ∼98%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	198.5 MB/s ∼94% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	181.3 MB/s ∼86% -13%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	181 MB/s ∼85% -13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 17G XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	247 MB/s ∼100% +19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	208.3 MB/s ∼84%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	204 MB/s ∼83% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	198 MB/s ∼80% -5%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	197.9 MB/s ∼80% -5%

Communication

The Intel AX201 comes standard for Bluetooth 5.1 and Wi-Fi 6 connectivity. We experienced no issues when connected to our Netgear RAX200 test router.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1283 (1089^min - 1413^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Aorus 17G XB Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1260 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	880 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	623 (577^min - 656^max) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	496 (459^min - 531^max) MBit/s ∼39% -61%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Bravo 17 A4DDR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1520 MBit/s ∼100% +29%
Aorus 17G XB Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1260 MBit/s ∼83% +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1182 (1085^min - 1338^max) MBit/s ∼78%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	638 (625^min - 645^max) MBit/s ∼42% -46%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	634 (621^min - 646^max) MBit/s ∼42% -46%

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1182 (1085-1338)

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1283 (1089-1413)

Webcam

ColorChecker Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz: 8.71 ∆E min: 1.66 - max: 21.72 ∆E

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz

Maintenance

Easy access to RAM and storage with a T5 Torx screwdriver

Input Devices

Keyboard feedback remains identical to the 2019 model. Secondary symbols may not be lit depending on region

Shift key is now longer at the expense of smaller Up and Down arrow keys

Display

The new 1080p 300 Hz display is a distinguishing factor separating the 2020 Blade Pro 17 from earlier versions. The laptop is the first in our database to come with the Sharp LQ173M1JW02 IPS panel compared to "only" 240 Hz on the Blade 15 or Gigabyte Aero 17. Users who prefer last year's 4K UHD 120 Hz panel instead still have that option on the 2020 series.

The 1080p300 panel has some advantages and disadvantages when compared to the aforementioned glossy 4K120 panel other than the obvious resolution and refresh rate differences. Though brightness is almost the same between them, the 4K panel offers a slightly higher contrast ratio with much wider color coverage for deeper and more accurate colors than our 300 Hz panel. In turn, the 300 Hz panel has faster black-white and gray-gray response times to limit ghosting.

Users can quickly switch between 60 Hz, 240 Hz, or 300 Hz refresh rates via Razer Synapse. Needless to say, the 300 Hz refresh rate feels silky smooth even though the visual experience doesn't feel all that much better than 240 Hz during day-to-day workloads.

Once you become accustomed to 120 Hz or faster monitors, it's hard going back to 60 Hz

Side bezels are much narrower than the top and bottom bezels

Minor uneven backlight bleeding along the corners and bottom edge

Matte panel exhibits very little graininess, but it's still not going to be as crisp as the glossy 4K option


368.4 cd/m²	356.9 cd/m²	367 cd/m²
323.2 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	332 cd/m²
287.1 cd/m²	293.1 cd/m²	308.3 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Sharp LQ173M1JW02

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 368.4 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 329.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 78 %
Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²
Contrast: 937:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.74 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 2.12
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080	Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR AU Optronics B173HAN05.1, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080	MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080	Alienware m17 R2 P41E Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080	Aorus 17G XB AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080	Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 17.30, 3840x2160
Display		-2%	-10%	-1%	-1%	18%
Display P3 Coverage	72.2	70 -3%	62.6 -13%	70.8 -2%	70.6 -2%	84.8 17%
sRGB Coverage	98.5	96.6 -2%	93.5 -5%	98.5 0%	97.2 -1%	99.9 1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	73	72.3 -1%	64.7 -11%	72.2 -1%	72.8 0%	98.6 35%
Response Times		11%	-17%	-110%	-106%	-90%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	5.6 ?(2.6, 3)	5.6 ?(2.4, 3.2) -0%	7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4) -29%	17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4) -207%	16 ?(7.6, 8.4) -186%	15.2 ?(8.4, 6.8) -171%
Response Time Black / White *	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)	7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2) 21%	10 ?(5.2, 4.8) -4%	10.8 ?(6, 4.8) -13%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -25%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) -8%
PWM Frequency			25510 ?(17)	26320 ?(25)
Screen		23%	31%	32%	31%	3%
Brightness middle	328	288 -12%	366 12%	384.2 17%	293 -11%	346.7 6%
Brightness	329	276 -16%	343 4%	357 9%	285 -13%	332 1%
Brightness Distribution	78	93 19%	91 17%	90 15%	95 22%	91 17%
Black Level *	0.35	0.24 31%	0.29 17%	0.29 17%	0.24 31%	0.27 23%
Contrast	937	1200 28%	1262 35%	1325 41%	1221 30%	1284 37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.74	1.92 59%	1.51 68%	1.35 72%	1.27 73%	5.62 -19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.99	4.57 49%	3.22 64%	3.45 62%	2.24 75%	9.36 -4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.12	1.14 46%	0.71 67%	1.42 33%	1.06 50%	3.81 -80%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.8	3.08 55%	1.93 72%	1.2 82%	1.34 80%	5.5 19%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.42 ^91%	2.38 ^92%	2.23 ^99%	2.38 ^92%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6446 ^101%	7055 ^92%	6881 ^94%	6580 ^99%	6542 ^99%	6175 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	64.8	65 0%	60 -7%	65.5 1%	73 13%	87.2 35%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	98.6	96 -3%	94 -5%	98.5 0%	94 -5%	100 1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		11% / 17%	1% / 18%	-26% / 8%	-25% / 8%	-23% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

Color space is narrower than on the 4K UHD 120 Hz option. Users can expect full sRGB coverage here as opposed to full AdobeRGB on the 4K alternative. We suspect that this is because there are no widely available 15.6-inch 300 Hz panels in the market at the moment that also have full AdobeRGB coverage.

The display could have been better calibrated out of the box. Color temperature is slightly too warm and the average grayscale DeltaE of 6.8 is relatively high for a flagship laptop such as this. Calibrating the panel ourselves addresses the issues for a more color-accurate display.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.6 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18988 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility isn't noticeably better or worse than on the 2019 model or most other gaming laptops for that matter. The ~300 nit display wasn't designed to be overcome such bright ambient lighting regardless of the matte overlay.

Performance

All 2020 options come standard with the 10th gen octa-core Core i7-10875H to succeed last year's 9th gen hexa-core Core i7-9750H. Unlike most other gaming laptops, Razer does not offer the hexa-core Core i7-10750H. Core i9 isn't available here as well, but that is not something we would recommend for thin-and-light gaming laptops based on what we've seen on the MSI GS66.

RAM has been upgraded from DDR4-2667 to DDR4-2933. Two accessible SODIMM slots allow for up to 64 GB.

Nvidia Optimus is not included, but users can manually switch between the integrated and discrete GPUs via the Razer Synapse software. A reboot will be required each time. Manual graphics switching usually implies G-Sync support, but that is not available here.

Annoyingly, Razer Synapse will always be stuck on its login screen if booting up the system with wireless disabled. You'll have to re-enable wireless and then completely restart Synapse to get past the login screen.

Synapse window for controlling fans, power profile, display refresh rate, and graphics switching

Processor

CPU performance is slightly slower than the average Core i7-10875H processor in our database. Even so, raw multi-thread performance is about 45 percent faster than on last year's Blade Pro 17 with the Core i7-9750H. This won't translate to 45 percent faster frame rates, of course, but content creators will almost certainly benefit more from the additional cores. It's too bad that Razer doesn't offer any Ryzen 7 4800H options as AMD has been putting a lot of pressure on Intel with its impressive Ryzen series thus far.

When running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread in a loop, the initial high score of 1494 points would dip to 1360 points by the second loop to represent a performance drop of about 9 percent.

See our dedicated page on the Core i7-10875H for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)

Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1773 (1724.58-1815.79)

Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1572 (1548.11-1671.4)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.4: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	4288 Points ∼100% +27%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	4136 Points ∼96% +23%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4132 Points ∼96% +23%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3843 Points ∼90% +14%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	3712 Points ∼87% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1986 - 4176, n=32)	3455 Points ∼81% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	3367 Points ∼79%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	3224 Points ∼75% -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	2888 Points ∼67% -14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H	2328 Points ∼54% -31%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	1906 Points ∼44% -43%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	495 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (430 - 524, n=32)	486 Points ∼98% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	483 Points ∼98%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	478 Points ∼97% -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	478 Points ∼97% -1%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	477 Points ∼96% -1%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	476 Points ∼96% -1%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	441 Points ∼89% -9%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	437 Points ∼88% -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H	431 Points ∼87% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	428 Points ∼86% -11%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	1863 Points ∼100% +20%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1816 (1724.58^min - 1815.79^max) Points ∼97% +17%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	1754 Points ∼94% +13%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	1721 Points ∼92% +11%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1708 (1581.15^min - 1708.45^max) Points ∼92% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38)	1554 Points ∼83% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	1549 (1352.68^min - 1494.38^max) Points ∼83%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1398 (1313.46^min - 1397.77^max) Points ∼75% -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	1308 Points ∼70% -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H	1094 Points ∼59% -29%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	839 (755.39^min - 839.42^max) Points ∼45% -46%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	206 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37)	204 Points ∼99% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	200 Points ∼97%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	195.8 Points ∼95% -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	195 Points ∼95% -2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	193 Points ∼94% -3%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	189 Points ∼92% -5%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	189 Points ∼92% -5%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	180 Points ∼87% -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	178 Points ∼86% -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H	175 Points ∼85% -12%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	555 Seconds * ∼100% -71%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	379.1 Seconds * ∼68% -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	345 Seconds * ∼62% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30)	327 Seconds * ∼59% -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	324 Seconds * ∼58%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	297 Seconds * ∼54% +8%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	293 Seconds * ∼53% +10%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	278 Seconds * ∼50% +14%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	271 Seconds * ∼49% +16%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5463 MIPS ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31)	5360 MIPS ∼98% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	5245 MIPS ∼96%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	5086 MIPS ∼93% -3%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	4924 MIPS ∼90% -6%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4717 MIPS ∼86% -10%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	4662 MIPS ∼85% -11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	4634 MIPS ∼85% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	4471 MIPS ∼82% -15%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	48837 MIPS ∼100% +45%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	48577 MIPS ∼99% +44%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	46976 MIPS ∼96% +40%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	46591 MIPS ∼95% +38%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (29844 - 49562, n=31)	43117 MIPS ∼88% +28%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	36693 MIPS ∼75% +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	33674 MIPS ∼69%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	32386 MIPS ∼66% -4%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	22139 MIPS ∼45% -34%

Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1352 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29)	1304 Points ∼96% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	1278 Points ∼95%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	1227 Points ∼91% -4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	1218 Points ∼90% -5%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1189 Points ∼88% -7%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	1143 Points ∼85% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	1108 Points ∼82% -13%

Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	8104 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	7782 Points ∼96% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29)	7734 Points ∼95% +3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	7675 Points ∼95% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	7531 Points ∼93%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	6317 Points ∼78% -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	5260 Points ∼65% -30%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	4032 Points ∼50% -46%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	13 fps ∼100%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	12.2 fps ∼94%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	12.19 fps ∼94%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	11.86 fps ∼91%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)	11.7 fps ∼90%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	9.41 fps ∼72%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	9.27 fps ∼71%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	6.34 fps ∼49%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	64.1 s * ∼100% -11%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	61.4 s * ∼96% -6%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	58.9 s * ∼92% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	57.8 s * ∼90%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	53.4 s * ∼83% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)	50.3 s * ∼78% +13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	50.2 s * ∼78% +13%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR Intel Core i5-10300H	0.676 sec * ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H	0.626 sec * ∼93%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT AMD Ryzen 5 4600H	0.626 sec * ∼93%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.596 sec * ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)	0.582 sec * ∼86%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.564 sec * ∼83%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1549 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

166 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

200 Points

Help

... in comparison

System Performance

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6571 Points ∼62% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	6290 Points ∼60%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6202 Points ∼59% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6049 Points ∼57% -4%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	5804 Points ∼55% -8%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	5502 Points ∼52% -13%
Essentials
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	10239 Points ∼49% +4%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	9933 Points ∼48% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9927 Points ∼48% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	9831 Points ∼47%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	9501 Points ∼46% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9405 Points ∼45% -4%
Productivity
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	8253 Points ∼65% +3%
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	8237 Points ∼65% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	8028 Points ∼64%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7654 Points ∼61% -5%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	7622 Points ∼60% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7357 Points ∼58% -8%
Digital Content Creation
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	9128 Points ∼44% +7%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8862 Points ∼43% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	8560 Points ∼42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8344 Points ∼41% -3%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	7330 Points ∼36% -14%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	5514 Points ∼27% -36%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5319 Points ∼80% +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	5217 Points ∼78%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	4461 Points ∼67% -14%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	4384 Points ∼66% -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4255 Points ∼64% -18%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6593 Points ∼93% +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	6317 Points ∼89%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	5818 Points ∼82% -8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	5716 Points ∼80% -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4755 Points ∼67% -25%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5217 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6317 points
PCMark 10 Score		6290 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening multiple tabs on our homepage, but the latency isn't as bad as what we recorded on some other gaming laptops from Asus or MSI. 4K video playback on YouTube remains smooth with no dropped frames.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	8852 μs * ∼100% -759%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G	2952 μs * ∼33% -187%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	2841 μs * ∼32% -176%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	1030 μs * ∼12%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Almost all Razer laptops comes with either a Samsung or Lite-On SSD, but it's difficult to know exactly which one of the two you might be getting. Our particular unit comes equipped with the 512 GB Lite-On CA5-8D512 NVMe drive for generally slower performance than the Samsung SSD PM981a. Unless if you're a content creator working with numerous small files, however, then you're probably not going to notice the difference.

Empty secondary M.2 2280 bay for expansion

	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Lite-On CA5-8D512	MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)	Alienware m17 R2 P41E 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	Aorus 17G XB Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD		41%	26%	68%	54%
Seq Read	2019	2855 41%	1938 -4%	1791 -11%	1881 -7%
Seq Write	1314	2687 104%	2094 59%	2193 67%	2354 79%
4K Read	46.61	30.31 -35%	25.88 -44%	50.7 9%	43.42 -7%
4K Write	90.2	96.3 7%	100.8 12%	116.8 29%	104.1 15%
4K-64 Read	665	1460 120%	1217 83%	1525 129%	1805 171%
4K-64 Write	813	1224 51%	1137 40%	1958 141%	1775 118%
Access Time Read *	0.058	0.054 7%	0.051 12%	0.07 -21%	0.049 16%
Access Time Write *	0.167	0.038 77%	0.107 36%	0.032 81%	0.106 37%
Score Read	913	1776 95%	1437 57%	1755 92%	2037 123%
Score Write	1034	1589 54%	1447 40%	2294 122%	2115 105%
Score Total	2392	4259 78%	3624 52%	4972 108%	5215 118%
Copy ISO MB/s	1715	2226 30%	1926 12%		1877 9%
Copy Program MB/s	622	426.4 -31%	626 1%		539 -13%
Copy Game MB/s	1506	1152 -24%	1533 2%		1368 -9%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		4%	-3%	5%	-10%
Write 4K	119	95.5 -20%	110.6 -7%	123.4 4%	121.7 2%
Read 4K	51.9	42.59 -18%	41.46 -20%	45.02 -13%	43.81 -16%
Write Seq	2258	2851 26%	2378 5%	2526 12%	1276 -43%
Read Seq	2283	2696 18%	2114 -7%	2062 -10%	1183 -48%
Write 4K Q32T1	491	402.6 -18%	445.4 -9%	497.9 1%	527 7%
Read 4K Q32T1	540	443.9 -18%	509 -6%	579 7%	592 10%
Write Seq Q32T1	2253	3420 52%	2735 21%	2982 32%	2379 6%
Read Seq Q32T1	3172	3514 11%	3206 1%	3440 8%	3213 1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		23% / 28%	12% / 15%	37% / 41%	22% / 31%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Lite-On CA5-8D512

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3172 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2253 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 540 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 491 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2283 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2258 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 51.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 119 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU Performance

We noted in the past that the performance differences between the older Max-Q and newer Super Max-Q GeForce GPUs can be so narrow that certain laptops with older Max-Q GPUs could sometimes outperform their newer Super Max-Q counterparts. In this case, the RTX 2070 Max-Q in our Razer is able to consistently outscore the newer RTX 2070 Super Max-Q in the Aorus 17G and even the RTX 2080 Super Max-Q in the MSI GS66. Razer offers an RTX 2080 Super Max-Q option as well, but don't feel like you'll be missing much if you decide to "settle" with the RTX 2070 Max-Q.

See our dedicated page on the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q for more technical information and gaming benchmarks.

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	25497 Points ∼100% +20%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	23032 Points ∼90% +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	21191 Points ∼83%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	21004 Points ∼82% -1%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	20117 Points ∼79% -5%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	19338 Points ∼76% -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	19230 Points ∼75% -9%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	18807 Points ∼74% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (11563 - 21191, n=31)	17489 Points ∼69% -17%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	14753 Points ∼58% -30%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	12038 Points ∼47% -43%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H	9621 Points ∼38% -55%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	9854 Points ∼100% +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	8844 Points ∼90% +10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	8065 Points ∼82%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7732 Points ∼78% -4%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	7618 Points ∼77% -6%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	7358 Points ∼75% -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	7294 Points ∼74% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (5948 - 8065, n=28)	6745 Points ∼68% -16%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	6312 Points ∼64% -22%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5335 Points ∼54% -34%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	3749 Points ∼38% -54%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H	3461 Points ∼35% -57%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	10012 Points ∼100% +22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	8460 Points ∼84% +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	8236 Points ∼82%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7878 Points ∼79% -4%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	7633 Points ∼76% -7%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	7475 Points ∼75% -9%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	7261 Points ∼73% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (5989 - 8236, n=28)	6746 Points ∼67% -18%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	6610 Points ∼66% -20%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5406 Points ∼54% -34%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	3751 Points ∼37% -54%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H	3554 Points ∼35% -57%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	34846 Points ∼100% +26%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	30910 Points ∼89% +12%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	27955 Points ∼80% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	27694 Points ∼79%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	26855 Points ∼77% -3%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	26413 Points ∼76% -5%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	25706 Points ∼74% -7%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	24465 Points ∼70% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (14723 - 27694, n=31)	22548 Points ∼65% -19%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	19329 Points ∼55% -30%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	15145 Points ∼43% -45%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H	13168 Points ∼38% -52%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS	18934 Points ∼100% +22%
Aorus 17G XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	16266 Points ∼86% +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	15564 Points ∼82%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13742 Points ∼73% -12%
MSI GS66 10SGS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H	13592 Points ∼72% -13%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H	13126 Points ∼69% -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (9107 - 17603, n=30)	12665 Points ∼67% -19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	12170 Points ∼64% -22%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	11416 Points ∼60% -27%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	10270 Points ∼54% -34%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H	8969 Points ∼47% -42%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7358 Points ∼39% -53%

3DMark 11 Performance		23306 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		48701 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18543 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		8236 points
Help

... in comparison

The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Aorus 17 YA Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	95.4 (80^min) fps ∼100% +18%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	85.1 (71^min) fps ∼89% +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	81 (72^min - 91^max) fps ∼85% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	80.9 (75^min - 90^max) fps ∼85%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	74.3 fps ∼78% -8%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	73.6 (62^min) fps ∼77% -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (56 - 83.8, n=31)	66.3 fps ∼69% -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	63 fps ∼66% -22%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	55.6 (53^min - 60^max) fps ∼58% -31%
EVGA SC15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	39.6 fps ∼42% -51%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	37.4 fps ∼39% -54%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	161 (133^min) fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	151.4 (144^min - 166^max) fps ∼94%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	145 (127^min - 163^max) fps ∼90% -4%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	142.7 fps ∼89% -6%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	142 (118^min) fps ∼88% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (86.5 - 151.4, n=22)	121 fps ∼75% -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	108.9 fps ∼68% -28%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	103 (98^min - 108^max) fps ∼64% -32%
EVGA SC15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	66 fps ∼41% -56%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	66 fps ∼41% -56%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Aorus 17 YA Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	133.8 (117.2^min) fps ∼100% +6%
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	129 (112.4^min) fps ∼96% +2%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile	126 (109.6^min) fps ∼94% 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	126 (108.2^min) fps ∼94%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	119.6 (103.2^min) fps ∼89% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (105.8 - 126, n=13)	119.2 fps ∼89% -5%
EVGA SC15 Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	117.9 fps ∼88% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	116.8 (99^min) fps ∼87% -7%
MSI GS66 10SGS Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	116 (101.2^min) fps ∼87% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3i 15IMH05 Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile	107.5 (90.7^min) fps ∼80% -15%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	104 (91^min) fps ∼78% -17%