Notebookcheck Logo

TeamGroup T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T

T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T

The TM8FFE004T is a T-Force G50-series TeamGroup SSD with a 4 TB capacity. Launched in November 2023, this 22 by 80 and NVMe-protocol data storage solution promises a lack of throttling (which our tests do not confirm) due to advanced passive cooling, as well as solid MTBF and TBW values of 3,000,000 and 2,600, respectively.

This PCIe 4 x4 SSD has no DRAM cache, meaning it will most likely slow down as most of its capacity gets filled with files.

Performance

TeamGroup promises sequential read approaching 5 GB/s, as well as 4.5 GB/s writes. AS SSD 2 believes the drive gets quite close to those values at 4.36 and 4.64 GB/s, respectively.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity4000 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced21.11.2023
LinkTeamGroup T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T

Benchmarks

AS SSD - Copy Game
2200.4 MB/s (37%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
1276.3 MB/s (47%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
2948 MB/s (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
6850 Points (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
2857 Points (40%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
2631 Points (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
0.1 ms (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
0.1 ms (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
2243.2 MB/s (38%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
2131.3 MB/s (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
150.1 MB/s (29%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
64 MB/s (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
4638.9 MB/s (41%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
4357.1 MB/s (34%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
237.7 MB/s (21%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
81.5 MB/s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
5126 MB/s (28%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
3535 MB/s (42%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
486.6 MB/s (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
639.6 MB/s (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
5122 MB/s (34%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
5227 MB/s (28%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
214 MB/s (49%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
79.9 MB/s (23%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
3775 MB/s (60%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
3153 MB/s (39%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
5091 MB/s (50%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
3481 MB/s (45%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
5133 MB/s (35%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
5264 MB/s (33%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
4646 MB/s (28%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900200021002200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400350036003700380039004000410042004300440045004600470048004900500051005200Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.34
log 28. 12:35:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Oct 2025 00:05:30 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4328 +0.002s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 4328 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#9 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.021s

#10 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.042s ... 0.063s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.043s ... 0.106s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.04s ... 0.146s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.042s ... 0.189s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.044s ... 0.233s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.047s ... 0.28s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.055s ... 0.336s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.048s ... 0.383s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.046s ... 0.43s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.039s ... 0.469s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.05s ... 0.519s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.04s ... 0.559s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.043s ... 0.602s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.044s ... 0.646s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.026s ... 0.672s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.022s ... 0.694s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.019s ... 0.713s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.02s ... 0.732s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.022s ... 0.754s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.023s ... 0.777s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.024s ... 0.8s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.022s ... 0.822s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.843s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.864s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.019s ... 0.883s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.018s ... 0.901s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.922s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.024s ... 0.946s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.019s ... 0.965s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.986s

#40 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 1.007s

#41 return log +0.002s ... 1.009s

Notebook reviews with TeamGroup T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T

HP Omen 17z gaming laptop review: Hot performer with cool temperatures

HP Omen 17z gaming laptop review: Hot performer with cool temperatures

The design may not be new, but its balanced specifications and relatively cool core temperatures when gaming give the Omen 17z a leg up against other midrange g...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | 17.30" | 2.9 kg

HP Omen 17z-db100: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 17.30", 2.9 kg
   » HP Omen 17 with AMD Zen 5 is only slightly faster than last year's Zen 4 options

   » 2025 HP Omen 17 with AMD Zen 5 runs cooler and quieter than the average gaming laptop

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-10-28)